Diameter Tuning of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 Nanowires Using Chemical Vapor Deposition Technique
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 20 October 2016
Accepted: 11 February 2017
Published: 9 March 2017
Diameter tuning of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires using chemical vapor deposition technique have been investigated under various experimental conditions. Diameter of root grown \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires having monoclinic crystal structure is tuned by varying separation distance between metal source and substrate. Effect of gas flow rate and mixer ratio on the morphology and diameter of nanowires has been studied. Nanowire diameter depends on growth temperature, and it is independent of catalyst nanoparticle size at higher growth temperature (850–900 °C) as compared to lower growth temperature (800 °C). These nanowires show changes in structural strain value with change in diameter. Band-gap of nanowires increases with decrease in the diameter.
KeywordsGallium oxide Nanowire Diameter Band-gap Chemical vapor deposition
In the past decade, wide band-gap semiconductor nanowires have received extensive research interest due to their potential device applications [1–10]. Recently, beta gallium oxide (β-Ga2O3) with its one dimensional morphology is emerging as one of the potential semiconductor oxide nanomaterial. It has shown promising device applications including high-temperature gas sensors, UV photodetectors, high power field effect transistors (FET), and photonic switches [2, 3, 9–15]. β-Ga2O3 exhibits advantageous properties including large band-gap with Eg ~ 4.7–4.9 eV at room temperature (RT), high breakdown field of 8 MVcm−1, and outstanding thermal and chemical stability at high temperatures [11, 16–19]. It has stable β-phase, which exhibits monoclinic crystal structure .
Several applications of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanostructures have been explored [3, 9, 10]. To grow, thermal chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is the most accepted and widely used technique [14, 20, 21]. It is attractive due to high deposition rate, capability of producing highly dense and pure materials, reproducibility of synthesis, and ability to control the morphology of nanostructures by controlling process parameters. For nanowire growth, vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) or vapor-solid (VS) process are well established growth mechanisms . The β-Ga2O3 nanostructures including nanowires, nanosheets, nanobelts, and nanorods grown by CVD have been shown in number of reports [12, 20, 23, 24]. Nanowires as building blocks of nanodevices allow tuning of fundamental optical and electronic properties of devices by tuning nanowire diameter. Further, high aspect-ratio nanowires with different diameters are advantageous for catalytic functionalities and sensors due to large surface to volume ratio. Recently, Reddy et al.  have shown high photocatalytic activity of β-Ga2O3 nanorods under UV irradiation. Kumar et al.  have shown the catalytic activity of thermosensitive Ga2O3 nanorods. Li et al.  have demonstrated high performance of bridged Ga2O3 nanowires for solar-blind photodetection. Ling et al.  demonstrate pH sensor based on Ga2O3 nanowires and suggested possibilities for improvement in performance of pH sensors by nanowire dimensions related sensing capabilities. Conduction properties of nanowire depend on its diameter. Nanowires with diameter smaller than the depletion layer width existing due to surface state charges are completely depleted whereas nanowires with larger diameter have a conducting channel . Wie et al.  have studied diameter-dependent band-gap alteration in strained ZnO nanowires. Therefore, diameter tuning of Ga2O3 nanowire using experimental conditions is highly desirable to tune the nanodevice properties. In this work, diameter tuning of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires by CVD technique using various experimental conditions have been investigated. The dependence of nanowire diameter on separation distances between metal source and substrate has been studied. Various growth temperatures with different Au nanoparticles were explored to tune the diameter of nanowires. The nanowires with different diameters have been further investigated using XRD, Raman, and UV-vis techniques.
\( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires have been grown on Au nanoparticles coated sapphire substrate using CVD technique where Au nanoparticles serve as catalyst. The colloidal solutions of Au nanoparticles of sizes 50 nm (with concentrations ~3.4 × 1010 particles/mL) and 20 nm (with concentrations ~6.8 × 1011 particles/mL) were purchased from Ted Pella Inc. Au nanoparticles from colloidal solution were dispersed on sapphire substrate using two-step spin-coating method (3000 rpm for 60 s followed by 9000 rpm for 30 s) and then annealed at 200 °C in the presence of argon flow (50 mL/min). Gallium metal (purity 99.999% from Sigma Aldrich) and substrate are kept in same temperature zone. Oxygen and argon gases were used to grow \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires. Nanowire growth has been studied systematically using various growth temperatures, different Ar/O2 total flow rates, different flow rate ratios, and different separation distances between source metal and substrate under pressure of 2.5 Torr.
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images were recorded at RT with electron beam energy of 5 and 10 keV using Raith e-line plus system. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using Rigaku having CuKα radiation. Raman analyses were performed at RT in backscattering configuration using an excitation wavelength of 514 nm using Horiba-LabRAM HR Evolution instrument. UV-vis spectrophotometer from Perkin Elmer (Model Lambda 1050) has been used for reflectance measurements.
Results and Discussion
where ρ, u, and μ are mass density, flow density, and viscosity, and ρu/μ is called the Reynolds number. For deposition process, reactant gases must diffuse through varying boundary layer thickness ∆ l shown by Eq. (2) toward downstream to reach the deposition surface (Fig. 3). It shows that the deposition process on wafer surface depends on S d value. It is well known that reactant species are consumed going downstream in CVD process [31, 34, 35]. Purushothaman and Jeganathan  have shown that gallium vapor pressure during growth decreases with increase in S d value. Menzel et al.  have also studied the decrease in metal vapor concentration with S d for nanowire growth using thermal CVD. Consequently, the concentration of reactant species is depleted with increase in S d value. Therefore, diameter of Ga2O3 nanowires is reduced due to increase in ∆ l and depletion of reactant species with increase in S d .
It is noted that catalyst droplets on tip of nanowires have not been present as shown by circles in inset of Fig. 2b, c. However, clusters were noticed in the root of nanowires. Dotted circle in inset of Fig. 2d shows the cluster (~600 nm) in nanowire root. This indicates the preferential nanowire nucleation follow root growth. Nanowire nucleation within catalyst depends on material-catalyst phase diagram, interfacial parameters, and contact angle of catalyst-nucleus and nucleus-substrate . The noted large size of root cluster is due to supersaturation in catalyst alloy induced by metal vapor pressure at high temperature . Adatom diffusion and direct nucleation of vapors play the crucial role in this root mediated Ga2O3 nanowires growth. These results show that diameter of root grown Ga2O3 nanowires can be tuned using S d and it decreases with increase in S d value under CVD process.
Modes with A u and B u symmetry are infrared active and modes with A g and B g symmetry are Raman active. Raman modes under non-resonant conditions depend on crystal orientation and polarization configurations specified by selection rules [41, 42]. On the basis of Raman study, unit cell of β-Ga2O3 consists of two formula unit cells as octahedral (Ga2O6) and tetrahedral (GaO4) [43, 44]. Low energy phonon modes (100–300 cm−1) correspond to the liberation and translation of tetrahedra-octahedra chains, moderate energy phonon modes (300–500 cm−1) correspond to deformation of Ga2O6 octahedra, and high energy phonon modes (600–800 cm−1) correspond to stretching and bending of GaO4 tetrahedra. In our previous report, Raman measurements from β-Ga2O3 nanowires and bulk single crystal have been reported . In the present case, the Raman peaks are in general agreement with the peaks reported for nanowires in , but we have observed further small shift as the nanowire diameter changes. For example, phonon mode at position 114.6 cm−1 for D1 shifts to the position 115.2 cm−1 for D2 and D3, while strongest phonon mode at position 202.3 cm−1 for D1 and D2 shifts to the position 201.2 cm−1 for D3. Similarly, phonon mode at position 652.9 cm−1 for D1 shifts to the position 654.3 cm−1 for D2 and 654.8 cm−1 for D3. While phonon mode at position 769.9 cm−1 for D1 shifts to the position 767.3 cm−1 for D3. It is reported that blue shift in the phonon modes is due to internal strain in the nanowires and red shift is due to the presence of defects in nanowires, such as O vacancies which cause abnormality in the Ga–O bond vibration [44, 46]. These small-shifted Raman positions in different nanowire diameters indicate variation in strain level as calculated from XRD measurements besides defects.
In conclusions, growth of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowires with different diameters has been explored under various experimental conditions using CVD technique. Diameter of \( \beta \)-Ga2O3 nanowire grown by catalyst alloy-mediated root growth can be tuned by adjusting growth conditions. The separation distance between metal source and substrate controls the nanowire diameter on the basis of boundary layer thickness and reactant vapor species. Nanowire diameter decreases with increase in the separation distance. Higher gas flow rate induces larger diameter; however, nanowire morphology gets deteriorated. Diameter of nanowires depends on growth temperature and catalyst nanoparticles size. Diameter of nanowire grown at higher temperature (850–900 °C) does not depend on catalyst nanoparticle size. The smaller diameter of nanowire (<50 nm) can be obtained using lower growth temperature (800 °C) and smaller catalyst nanoparticles size (20 nm). Ga2O3 nanowires exhibit \( \beta \)-phase with monoclinic crystal structure. XRD and Raman measurements indicate the changes in structural strain with nanowire diameter. Band-gap of these nanowires depends on its diameter, and it increases from 4.70 to 4.80 eV with decrease in nanowire diameter from several hundreds of nanometers to few hundreds of nanometers.
Authors acknowledge the Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India and Nanomission: Department of Science and Technology (DST), India (Project No. Sr/NM/NS-1106/2012 (G)) for the partial financial support for this work. One of the authors (Mukesh Kumar) is thankful to Indian Institute of Technology Delhi for providing research fellowship.
This study is funded by the Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, India.
All authors (Mukesh Kumar, Vikram Kumar, R. Singh) give their efforts for the research outcomes. MK performed the experiments under the supervision of authors VK and RS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Chen H, Liu H, Zhang Z, Hu K, Fang X (2016) Nanostructured photodetectors: from ultraviolet to terahertz. Adv Mater 28:403–433View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao B, Wang F, Chen H, Wang Y, Jiang M, Fang X, Zhao D (2015) Solar-blind avalanche photodetector based on single ZnO-Ga2O3 core-shell microwire. Nano Lett 15:3988–3993View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- L´opez I, Castaldini A, Cavallini A, Nogales E, M´endez B, Piqueras J (2014) β-Ga2O3 nanowires for an ultraviolet light selective frequency photodetector. J Phys D Appl Phys 47:415101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng L, Hu L, Fang X (2013) Low-dimensional nanostructure ultraviolet photodetectors. Adv Mater 25:5321–5328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hochbaum AI, Yang P (2010) Semiconductor nanowires for energy conversion. Chem Rev 110:527–46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan R, Gargas D, Yang P (2009) Nanowire photonics. Nat Photon 3:569–76View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Wang ZJ, Weinberg G, Meng XM, Willinger MG (2015) In situ scanning electron microscopy observation of growth kinetics and catalyst splitting in vapor-liquid-solid growth of nanowires. Adv Funct Mater 25:5979–5987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fang XS, Ye CH, Zhang LD, Wang YH, Wu YC (2005) Temperature-controlled catalytic growth of ZnS nanostructures by the evaporation of ZnS nanopowder. Adv Funct Mater 15:63–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Auer E, Liao MY, Fang XS, Zhai TY, Gautam UK, Lugstein A, Koide Y, Bando Y, Golberg D (2011) Deep-ultraviolet solar-blind photoconductivity of individual gallium oxide nanobelts. Nanoscale 3:1120–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh CH, Chou LJ, Lin GR, Bando Y, Golberg D (2008) Nanophotonic switch: gold-in-Ga2O3 peapod nanowires. Nano Lett 8:3081–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S (2014) Development of gallium oxide power devices. Phys Status Solidi A 211:21–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Singh R (2013) Nanofunctional gallium oxide (Ga2O3) nanowires/nanostructures and their applications in nanodevices. Phys Status Solidi RRL 7:781–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mazeina L, Perkins FK, Bermudez VM, Arnold SP, Prokes SM (2010) Functionalized Ga2O3 nanowires as active material in room temperature capacitance-based gas sensors. Langmuir 26:13722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold P, Prokes SM, Perkins FK, Zaghloul ME (2009) Design and performance of a simple, room-temperature Ga2O3 nanowire gas sensor. Appl Phys Lett 95:103102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phumying S, Labauyai S, Chareonboon W, Phokha S, Maensiri S (2015) Optical properties of β-Ga2O3 nanorods synthesized by a simple and cost-effective method using egg white solution. Jpn J Appl Phys 54:06FJ13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tippins HH (1965) Optical absorption and photoconductivity in the band edge of β-Ga2O3. Phys Rev 140:A316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hajnal Z, Miro J, Kiss G, Reti F, Deak P, Herndon RC, Kuperberg JM (1999) Role of oxygen vacancy defect states in the n-type conduction of β-Ga2O3. J Appl Phys 86:3792View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levin I, Brandon D (1998) Metastable alumina polymorphs: crystal structures and transition sequences. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1995–2012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geller S (1960) Crystal structure of β-Ga2O3. J Chem Phys 33:676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Tessarek C, Christiansen S, Singh R (2014) A comparative study of β-Ga2O3 nanowires grown on different substrates using CVD technique. J Alloy Compd 587:812–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson MC, Aloni S, McCready DE, Bourret-Courchesne ED (2006) Controlled vapor-liquid-solid growth of indium, gallium, and tin oxide nanowires via chemical vapor transport. Cryst. Growth Des 6:1936–41View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wagner RS, Ellis WC (1964) Vapor-liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl Phys Lett 4:89–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Kumar V, Singh T, Hahnel A, Singh R (2014) The effect of deposition time on the structural and optical properties of β-Ga2O3 nanowires grown using CVD technique. J Nanopart Res 16:2189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auer E, Lugstein A, Loffler S, Hyun YJ, Brezna W, Bertagnolli E, Pongratz P (2009) Ultrafast VLS growth of epitaxial beta- Ga(2)O(3) nanowires. Nanotechnology 20:434017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reddy LS, Ko YH, Yu JS (2015) Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic property of β-Ga2O3 nanorods. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar VB, Mishra RK, Pulidindi IN, Porat Z, John HTL, Gedanken A (2016) Preparation and catalytic activity of thermosensitive Ga2O3 nanorods. Energy Fuels 30:7419–7427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Tokizono T, Liao M, Zhong M, Koide Y, Yamada I, Delaunay JJ (2010) Efficient assembly of bridged β-Ga2O3 nanowires for solar-blind photodetection. Adv Funct Mater 20:3972–3978View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ling WY, Chang SP, Chang SJ, Weng WY, Lin YH (2015) A novel pH sensor using extended-gate field-effect transistors with Ga2O3 nanowires fabricated on SiO2/Si template. Sci of Adv Mat 7:478Google Scholar
- Calarco R, Stoica T, Brandt O, Geelhaar L (2011) Surface-induced effects in GaN nanowires. J Mater Res 26:2157–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei B, Zheng K, Ji Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Han X (2012) Size-dependent bandgap modulation of ZnO nanowires by tensile strain. Nano Lett 12:4595–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plummer JD, Deal MD, Griffin PB (2009) Silicon VLSI technology: fundamentals, practice and modeling (Indian edition)., pp 512–530, Dorling Kindersley India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, licensees by Pearson Education IncGoogle Scholar
- Mohammadi V, Boer WB, Nanver LK (2012) An analytical kinetic model for chemical-vapor deposition of pureB layers from diborane. J Appl Phys 112:113501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pierson HO (1999) Handbook of chemical vapor deposition (CVD): principles, technology, and applications (second edition). Noyes publications, William Andrew Publishing, LLC, Norwich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Purushothaman V, Jeganathan K (2013) Structural evolution and growth mechanism of self-assembled wurtzite gallium nitride (GaN) nanostructures by chemical vapor deposition. J Phys Chem C 117:7348–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menzel A, Goldberg R, Burshtein G, Lumelsky V, Subannajui K, Zacharias M, Lifshitz Y (2012) Controlled synthesis of ZnO nanostructures: the role of source and substrate temperatures. J Phys Chem C 116:5524–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue X (2008) Nanowire research progress; Chapter 11. Nova Science publishers, Inc, ISBN 978-1-60456-406-8Google Scholar
- Kodambaka S, Tersoff J, Reuter MC, Ross FM (2006) Diameter-independent kinetics in the vapor-liquid-solid growth of Si nanowires. Phys Rev Lett 96:096105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kar A, Low KB, Oye M, Stroscio MA, Dutta M, Nicholls A, Meyyappan M (2011) Investigation of nucleation mechanism and tapering observed in ZnO nanowire growth by carbothermal reduction technique. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(3):1–9Google Scholar
- Seo D, Lee J, Kim SW, Kim I, Na J, Hong MH, Choi HJ (2015) Structural modulation of silicon nanowires by combining a high gas flow rate with metal catalysts. Nanoscale Res Lett 10(190):1–7Google Scholar
- Mula G, Adelmann C, Moehl S, Oullier J, Daudin B (2001) Surfactant effect of gallium during molecular-beam epitaxy of GaN on AlN (0001). Phys Rev B 64:195406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kranert C, Sturm C, Grund RS, Grundmann M (2016) Raman tensor elements of β-Ga2O3. Sci Rep 6:35964View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ureña F, Olsen SH, Raskin JP (2013) Raman measurements of uniaxial strain in silicon nanostructures. J Appl Phys 114:144507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dohy D, Lucazeau G, Revcolevschi A (1982) Raman spectra and valence force field of single-crystalline β-Ga2O3. J Solid State Chem 45:180–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao R, Rao AM, Xu B, Dong J, Sharma S, Sunkara MK (2005) Blueshifted Raman scattering and its correlation with the  growth direction in gallium oxide nanowires. J Appl Phys 98:094312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Sarau G, Tessarek C, Bashouti MY, Hähnel A, Christiansen S, Singh R (2014) Study of iron-catalysed growth of β-Ga2O3 nanowires and their detailed characterization using TEM, Raman and cathodoluminescence techniques. J Phys D Appl Phys 47:435101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dai L, Chen XL, Zhang XN, Jin AZ, Zhou T, Hu BQ, Zhang Z (2002) Growth and optical characterization of Ga2O3 nanobelts and nanosheets. J App Phys 92:1062View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morales AE, Mora ES, Pal U (2007) Use of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for optical characterization of un-supported nanostructures. Rev Mex Fis S53:18–22Google Scholar
- Orita M, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H (2000) Deep-ultraviolet transparent conductive β-Ga2O3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 77:4166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He H, Orlando R, Blanco MA, Pandey R, Amzallag E, Baraille I, Rérat M (2006) First-principles study of the structural, electronic, and optical properties of Ga2O3 in its monoclinic and hexagonal phases. Phys Rev B 74:195123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kou L, Li C, Zhang ZY, Chen CF, Guo WL (2010) Charge carrier separation induced by intrinsic surface strain in pristine ZnO nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 97:053104View ArticleGoogle Scholar