Open Access

A Novel Polar Copolymer Design as a Multi-Functional Binder for Strong Affinity of Polysulfides in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:195

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-1948-5

Received: 12 February 2017

Accepted: 22 February 2017

Published: 16 March 2017

Abstract

High energy density, low cost and environmental friendliness are the advantages of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery which is regarded as a promising device for electrochemical energy storage systems. As one of the important ingredients in Li-S battery, the binder greatly affects the battery performance. However, the conventional binder has some drawbacks such as poor capability of absorbing hydrophilic lithium polysulfides, resulting in severe capacity decay. In this work, we reported a multi-functional polar binder (AHP) by polymerization of hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) with ethylenediamine (EDA) bearing a large amount of amino groups, which were successfully used in electrode preparation with commercial sulfur powder cathodes. The abundant amide groups of the binder endow the cathode with multidimensional chemical bonding interaction with sulfur species within the cathode to inhibit the shuttling effect of polysulfides, while the suitable ductility to buffer volume change. Utilizing these advantageous features, composite C/S cathodes based the binder displayed excellent capacity retention at 0.5 C, 1 C, 1.5 C, and 3 C over 200 cycles. Accompany with commercial binder, AHP may act as an alternative feedstock to open a promising approach for sulfur cathodes in rechargeable lithium battery to achieve commercial application.

Background

The lithium-sulfur (Li-S) rechargeable battery cells offering a theoretical cathode specific capacity of 1675 mAh g−1, which is five times higher than those commercial lithium ion batteries (LiCoO2 and LiFePO4), have been applied in a variety of the most promising energy storage devices to address the increasing energy storage demands for various technological applications [13]. Unfortunately, despite its considerable advantages, its practical use has been frustrated by several problems [46]. (1) The sulfur is low electron conductivity (5 × 10−30 S cm−1 at 25 °C), which generally causes low utilization of active materials. (2) Large variation in volume occurs during charge-discharge cycling, corrode cathode where they are not recycled on charge. (3) “Shuttle effect”, another major problem caused by the high dissolution of the discharge/charge, intermediates in organic electrolytes. Polysulfides dissolve into the electrolyte and penetrate through the separator to the lithium metal anode and then they are reduced to solid precipitates (Li2S), leading to quick capacity decay with the loss of active materials and an additional problem of low Coulombic efficiency in a rechargeable Li-S battery [710]. Although various approaches have been employed to overcome this problem [1114], such as N-doped materials [1517], carbon-based materials [18], conductive polymers [19, 20], metal oxides [2123], and transition metal disulfides [24]. None have proven commercially viable due to its high cost and not suitable for large scale manufacturing.

The binder is an important ingredient in Li-S battery, it functions to bond and keep the active materials in the electrode, to ensure well electrical contact between the active materials and conductive carbon, as well as to link the active materials with the current collector [2428]. In particular, the recent investigations on silicon anodes have revealed that ideal binder should not only able to adhesion strength and ductility with inexhaustible tolerance of large volume change and still physically and/or chemically trap capacity to attain high initial reversible capacity and excellent cycle ability. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is widely used as a conventional binder for Li-S batteries [28]. However, due to the linear-molecular structure, PVDF just play a role of physical adhesion, enabling the mechanical linkage of the active materials with additives, the function will fade with time when there is no bonding between those polymers and the carbon substrate, resulting in the vexed problem that polysulfide dissolved in the aprotic electrolyte. Therefore, new functional binder is the urgent needs to make up for the deficiencies of PVDF. Thus it can be seen crosslink structured binder for further improvement in the cycle life is constructed with the increased number of active sites between polysulfides and binder. Recent investigations shown that functional materials endued with amine groups have been viewed as an ideal hunter to absorb polar lithium sulfides and nonpolar carbon surface, which effectively prevents loss of active mass during cycles [29, 30].

Hence, in this paper, we introduced a multi-functional AHP binder with plenty amide groups as an efficient binder for Li-S batteries. Strong interactions between discharge products polysulfides are created throughout the cathode by the unique amide/amino crosslink structures of designed binder to buffer the shuttle effect of sulfur cathodes. Unlike conventional polymeric binders (PVDF), obvious superiority of our design is the binder with interconnected polar structure to form a stable electrode, and exhibit ductile architecture, resulting in a marked improvement of conventional C/S cathode in cycle life. It is noteworthy that the presented strategy is not engineered in any specialized manner, thus making the process commercially viable.

Methods

Synthesis of the AHP Binder

Ethylenediamine (EDA), hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Aladdin and used as received. The novel AHP binder was prepared by a copolymerize process using EDA (10 mmol) and HDI (5 mmol) in DMF solvent with high-speed magnetic stirring for 4 h at 60 °C. Then the product was uniformly dispersed in DMF solution with a mass ratio of 1 mg per 10 uL solvent.

Characterization

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Axis Ultra Dld, Japan) was used for elemental analysis and chemical bonding information after synthesis of EDA and HDI. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the surface topography of S cathodes with different binder before and after cycle.

Preparation of S@AHP Cathodes and Electrochemical Measurements

Bulk sulfur (Alfa Aesar, 043766) and acetylene black (Hefei Kejing Materials Technology Co., Ltd) with a mass ratio of 6:4 was ball milled for 60 min at 300 rpm. The obtained mixture was then heated at 210 °C for 12 h to encapsulate sulfur in the acetylene black. After cooling to room temperature, the C/S composite was obtained. Then the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, SDT 2960, USA) was performed on an SDT 2960, TA Instruments to confirm the mass of sulfur. Typically, the preparation of electrodes and battery assembly were that the electrodes from the C/S composite were prepared by making slurry of C/S and AHP binder in a mass ratio of 8.5:1.5 in DMF solvent, respectively. The slurry was then casted on the surface of Al foil and dried under vacuum at 60 °C overnight. Electrodes contained approximately 0.5 mg of sulfur per square centimeter, and 30 uL electrolyte was used in a coin cell. For comparison, C/S cathodes with various binders were prepared using PVDF and PTFE (both from Hefei Ke Jing Materials Technology Co., Ltd) instead of AHP by similar route.

The electrolyte was 1 M LiTFSI dissolved in a mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (1:1 v/v) with 1wt% lithium nitrate (LiNO3) as additive. Cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box, and the electrochemical test of discharge-charge properties and cyclic voltammetric were tested on the CT2001A cell test instrument (Wuhan LAND Electronic Co., Ltd) and CHI660E (Shanghai Chenhua instrument Co., Ltd) electrochemical workstation, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the design concept and synthesis schematic of the polar AHP binder that the linear HDI, acting as a bridge, grafts with EDA by the undiscriminating reactions between amine groups in EDA and isocyanates, resulting in (or forming) a much active site structure of AHP. Upon polymerization, the AHP structure incorporating a series of amide groups enable the binder to attain strong binding energy with polysulfides [31]. Comparing with commercial binders (such as PVDF, PTFE, Fig. 1b), significant advantages were introduced to the novel binder for Li-S battery. Polar group of amide was incorporated to strong anchor Li2Sn species, which is thought to have a strong affinity to lithium polysulfides, effectively keeping them within the cathode region and thus improving the electrochemical stability of the Li-S battery [3235].
Fig. 1

a Synthesis scheme of AHP copolymerize EDA with HDI in DMF solution. b Commercial binders of PVDF and PTFE. c Schematic illustration of different binder evolution during cycling

To better understand the effect of the mechanical and chemical characteristics among electrode components, the binding structural viewpoint of S with AHP and commercial linear binders (such as PVDF, PTFE) are expected to be different (Fig. 1c). During the discharge process (Li insertion), owing to the formation of insulating Li2S on the carbon matrix, linear PVDF or PTFE are forced to mechanical stretch or moved by the expanded polysulfides. The volume density of Li2S (1.67 g/cm3) is much lower than that of S (2.03 g/cm3), which would cause a volume expansion of the S cathode of 22% compared to their initial state during the whole discharge process. Upon charging (Li desertion) in the same cycle, the polysulfides shrink back to their original state; the linear binders, however, cannot fully follow the shrinkage of polysulfides, thus leading to an inevitably contact loss of electroactive materials from the carbon matrix, coupled with polysulfides dissolution, result in inferior performance of most sulfur-carbon composites. This issue becomes more prominent over extended cycling. On the contrary, AHP have plentiful amide side groups physically/chemically entangled to grasp polysulfides, leading to reinforced binding ability with polysulfides via hydrogen bonding [29, 30]. Thus, in this polymeric AHP binder provides multidimensional noncovalent interactions with the polysulfides surfaces through the amide groups. These interactions not only allow the AHP binder to accommodate the massive volume expansion of S cathodes during discharge process but also keep the polysulfides-binder interactions even during charge process.

The AHP binder was covalently cross-linked after the undiscriminating reactions of EDA with HDI. Therefore, to observe the possible mechanism of the discovered reaction between bio-inspired EDA and HDI, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey scanning spectra were utilized to prove the possible chemical characterization of the covalently binder, as presented in Fig. 2. Definitely, deconvolution of the N 1s signal reveals peaks for both amine (399.3 eV) and amide (400.1 eV) groups can be found, undoubtedly emerges from AHP binder, indicating that EDA has taken part in the reaction with HDI. It is to imply that after reaction, the amino groups were also retained and form polar amide groups. Besides, the C 1s signal can be well resolved corresponding to C–N amide bond at 288.4 eV and C–NH2 bond at 285.7 eV. Furthermore, the C=O (531.2 eV) 1s peak was observed (or collected) in the wide O 1s spectra. All of the results have provided hard evidence that the polymerization with EDA and HDI had occurred to formamide groups, which are benefitted to capture polysulfides.
Fig. 2

XPS scanning spectra for a AHP binder and b, c, d high-resolution C 1s , N 1s, and O 1s spectrum of AHP, respectively

In order to explore the electrochemical performance of S electrodes with the AHP binder, a series of electrochemical tests were carried out. CR2025 type coin cells were fabricated using lithium foil as the counter electrode. Figure 3a shows cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the C/S/AHP composite cathode at a scan rate of 0.01 mV S−1 between 1.5 and 3 V (vs Li/Li+). According to the multiple reaction mechanism between S and Li, two cathodic peaks are clearly observed: one is located at ~2.30 V attributing to the transformation of S8 to long-chain Li2Sn (4 ≤ n ≤ 8), and the other at ~2.05 V was ascribed to the further reduction of S to form low-order Li2Sn (n < 4), and finally Li2S. Anodic peaks are caused by the decomposition of Li2S and corresponding to the reverse process of the transformation of sulfur species to Li2Sn. Consistent with the CV analysis above, Fig. 3b shows the typical two-plateau charge/discharge profile of the C/S/AHP composite cathode at a current rate of 0.5 C, which could be assigned to the formation of long-chain polysulfides (high plateau) and short-chain polysulfides (low flat plateau), which was typical charge/discharge profile of Li-S cells.
Fig. 3

Electrochemical measurement of AHP binder. a The CV curve of S@AHP electrodes at a scan rate of 0.01 mV S−1 between 1.5–3.0 V. b (Dis) charge voltage profiles at 0.5 C (1C = 1672 mA/g). c, d The comparison performance between S@AHP, S@PTFE, and S@PVDF at a rate of 1 C, and the retention over 100 cycles. e Long-term cycling performance of S@AHP cathodes between 1.7–2.8 V with cycling performance and Coulombic efficiency at different current rates (0.5 C, 1 C, 1.5 C, and 3 C)

Long-term cycling and well stability is the first goal of a commercial battery, the electrochemical stability of the C/S/AHP composite cathode was investigated by testing under 1 C for 100 cycles, compared with similar electrodes using PTFE and PVDF as binders. The cycle life, discharge capacity, and Coulombic efficiency of electrode with AHP as binder were significantly better than those with PTFE and PVDF. As shown in Fig. 3c, after 100 cycles, the capacity of AHP binder stabilizes at 628 mAh g−1 with 81.2% retention (Fig. 3d) at 1 C. It is shown, in our work, the capacities of the conventional PTFE and PVDF binders drop very fast. The discharge capacity of S@PTFE started at capacity of 728 mAh g−1 but degraded severely to 395 mAh g−1 after the same number of cycles, which corresponds to 54.3% capacity retention, and the PVDF binder dropped more severely with 47.3% capacity retention. The S@AHP electrode exhibits the best cycling performance compared with common binders in Li-S batteries when the commercial sulfur powder is taken as active material. The stable cycling performance and high Coulombic efficiency (99%) imply that the AHP binder is benefit to confine polysulfides in the eletrode. Over 200 cycles, the reversible capacities of the C/S@AHP electrode at different rates of 0.5 C, 1 C, 1.5 C and 3 C also show excellent stability (Fig. 3e). Apparently, the enhanced reversibilityof AHP binders contribute a lot to cyclic performance of S electrode a possible mechanism is that the plentiful amide groups could efficiently inhibit the leakage of polysulfide during cycling. The much improved performance of the C/S@AHP electrode was due to the fact that the polar amino group of the binder provides the strong affinity to absorb lithium polysulfide intermediates, resulting in enhanced cycling performance [29, 30].

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements of AHP and PVDF binder were conducted within the frequency range between 0.1 Hz and 1 MHz. The Nyquist plot, presented in Fig. 4a, is composed of a depressed semicircle at high frequencies that corresponds to the solution resistance (Rs) and the interfacial charge transfer resistance (Rct), which is related to the electrochemical activities of the composites [3436]. The short, inclined line in the low-frequency region is associated with a semi-infinite Warburg diffusion process (W) of soluble lithium polysulfide in the electrolyte. According to the quantitative analysis (Fig. 4b), the changes between S@AHP cathode and S@PVDF cathode in Rs are not significant. In contrast, the variation of Rct is strongly associated with charge transfer of cathodes [3638]. This results are benefited to the excellent adhesion of AHP binder that strong and multidentate interactions with active materials were created that can effective promotion contact between S and the carbon matrix and is conducive to the charge transfer, resulting in a marked improvement of maintaining good electrical conduction for charge transfer by accommodating the S cathode.
Fig. 4

a AC impedance spectroscopy data of a lithium cell with the AHP and PVDF composite cathodes, (b) the resistance of AHP and PVDF binders according to the AC impedance spectroscopy

To further investigate the mechanical stability of C/S electrodes, C/S eletrodes were prepared with 15% AHP and PVDF as binder, respectively. The surface morphologies of different electrodes were characterized by SEM and shown in Fig. 5. Before cycling, no significant differences between the sulfur electrodes with different binders were observed, the active sulfur composite and acetylene black can be clearly distinguished in each electrode, indicating the AHP binder can effective bond the active materials. Differently, AHP binder presents an example of a more uniformly coated electrode in Fig. 5c. In particular, binder “bridges” emerge of the AHP binder between the adjacent C/S materials can be observed, indicating that the AHP binder has sufficient capacity to connect the active materials. In addition, the coated film has a strong adhesion to the Al foil. No materials peel off during the subsequent operations in which the electrode is bended and folded repeatedly. After 50 deep galvanostatic discharge at 0.5 C, Both S@AHP and S@PVDF cathodes exhibited uniform morphology distributions (Fig. 5b, d) as well as similar SEI formation filling the void space after the lithiation. The difference between the samples, however, became evident after 50 cycles such that S@AHP still preserved the uniform morphology distribution to a large extent (Fig. 5d), whereas S@PVDF clearly showed micrometer scale cracks (Fig. 5b, red oval) over the entire area of the film, indicating the AHP binder is better at preserving the original film morphology utilizing its superior multidimensional binding capability based on active site of amide groups [39]. These results clearly demonstrate that the polar AHP binder has capacity to maintain the electrical and mechanical integrity of S based cathodes upon deep galvanostatic cycling.
Fig. 5

SEM images of fresh electrodes: a S@PVDF, c S@AHP and of the electrodes after 50 cycles: b S@PVDF, d S@AHP electrodes

Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully developed a polar binder with plenty amide groups as multidimensional bonding site for high-performance Li-S cells, making substantial progress in improving electrochemical properties and therefore resolving the chronic insufficient cycle lives of S cathode. We demonstrate the lots of amide functional groups of the AHP binder with high binding strength construct effectual trap the sulfur species and subsequently confine them within the cathode and inhibit the shuttling effect, while the excellent mechanical properties of the S@AHP cathode with suitable flexible to buffer the volume change of sulfur. When AHP was applied to assemble cells with commercial sulfur and acetlene black have been cycled, they could show the stable capacity retention at different rates of cycles. As a result, we believe the synthesis of this polymeric polymer will arouse the battery community’s interest in fabricating long life Li-S cells and provide a novel method for synthesis new materials for Li ion batteries.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB931702), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91421110), and Sichuan Provincial Fund for Distinguished Young Academic and Technology Leaders (2014JQ0011). Y. J., W. C., and T. L. contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ Contributions

JY and CW draft the manuscript. CW and LTY make the contribution on directing the experiments and data analysis. DLP, CB, and WCY have taken part in the acquisition and interpretation of the data. XJ formulates the idea of investigation and is the corresponding author of the work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Applied and Chemical Engineering, Xichang College
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
(3)
Institute of Microelectronics of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Wu H, Yu G, Pan L, Liu N, McDowell MT, Bao Z, Cui Y (2013) Stable Li-ion battery anodes by in-situ polymerization of onducting hydrogel to conformally coat silicon nanoparticles. Nat Commun 4:1–6Google Scholar
  2. Tarascon JM, Armand M (2001) Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414:359–367View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Arico AS, Bruce P, Scrosati B, Tarascon J-M, van Schalkwijk W (2005) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat Mater 4:366–377View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Koo B, Kim H, Cho Y, Lee KT, Choi NS, Cho J (2012) A highly cross‐linked polymeric binder for high-performance silicon negative electrodes in lithium Ion batteries. Angew Chem 51:8762–8767View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen S, Bao P, Huang X, Sun B, Wang G (2014) Hierarchical 3D mesoporous silicon@graphene nanoarchitectures for lithium ion batteries with superior performance. Nano Res 7:85–94View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Xu R, Lu J, Amine K (2015) Progress in mechanistic understanding and characterization techniques of Li‐S batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mikhaylik YV, Akridge JR (2004) Polysulfide shuttle study in the Li/S battery system. J Electrochem Soc 151:A1969–A1976View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Marmorstein D, Yu TH, Striebel KA, Mclarnon FR, Hou J, Cairns EJ (2000) Electrochemical performance of lithium/sulfur cells with three different polymer electrolytes. J Power Sources 89:219–226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu Y, Rahm E, Holze R (2003) Carbon anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 114:228–236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. He G, Ji XL, Nazar LF (2011) High “C” rate Li-S cathodes: sulfur imbibed bimodal porous carbons. Energy Environ Sci 4:2878–2883View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Salem HA, Babu G, Rao CV, Arava LMR (2016) Electrocatalytic polysulfide traps for controlling redox shuttle process of Li–S batteries. J Am Chem Soc 137:11542–11545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yuan Z, Peng HJ, Hou TZ, Huang JQ, Chen CM, Wang DW, Cheng XB, Wei F, Zhang Q (2016) Powering lithium–sulfur battery performance by propelling polysulfide redox at sulfiphilic hosts. Nano Lett 16:519–527View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Balach J, Jaumann T, MuHlenhoff S, Eckert J, Giebeler L (2016) Enhanced polysulphide redox reaction using a RuO2 nanoparticle-decorated mesoporous carbon as functional separator coating for advanced lithium-sulphur batteries. Chem Commun 52:8134–8137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Peng HJ, Zhang ZW, Huang JQ, Zhang G, Xie J, Xu WT, Shi JL, Chen X, Cheng XB, Zhang Q (2016) A cooperative interface for highly efficient lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 28:9551–9558View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Qiu YC, Rong GL, Yang J, Li GZ, Ma S, Wang XL, Pan ZH, Hou Y, Liu MN, Ye FM, Li WF, Seh ZW, Tao XY, Yao HB, Liu N, Zhang RF, Zhou GM, Wang JP, Fan SS, Cui Y, Zhang YG (2015) Safety‐reinforced poly(propylene carbonate)‐based All‐solid‐state polymer electrolyte for ambient‐temperature solid polymer lithium batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1501369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Song JX, Gordin ML, Xu T, Chen S, Yu ZX, Sohn H, Lu J, Ren Y, Duan YH, Wang DH (2015) Strong lithium polysulfide chemisorption on electroactive sites of nitrogen‐doped carbon composites for high‐performance lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:4399–4403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhou G, Zhao Y, Manthiram A (2015) Dual‐confined flexible sulfur cathodes encapsulated in nitrogen‐doped double‐shelled hollow carbon spheres and wrapped with graphene for Li–S batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1402263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhou G, Pei S, Li L, Wang DW, Wang S, Huang K, Yin LC, Li F, Cheng HM (2014) A graphene-pure-sulfur sandwich structure for ultrafast, long-life lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 26:625–631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Yin LC, Wang JL, Lin FJ, Yang J, Nuli Y (2012) Polyacrylonitrile/graphene composite as a precursor to a sulfur-based cathode material for high-rate rechargeable Li–S batteries. Energy Environ Sci 5:6966–6972View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Li WY, Zhang QF, Zheng GY, Seh ZW, Yao H, Cui Y (2013) Understanding the role of different conductive polymers in improving the nanostructured sulfur cathode performance. Nano Lett 13:5534–5540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazouzi D, Lestriez B, Roue L, Guyomard D (2009) Silicon composite electrode with high capacity and long cycle life. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 12:A215–A218View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wei SZ, Li W, Cha JJ, Zheng G, Yang Y, Mcdowell MT, Hsu PC, Cui Y (2013) Sulphur-TiO2 yolk-shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium-sulphur batteries. Nature Commun 4:1331View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang X, Garsuch A, Nazar LF (2015) Sulfur cathodes based on conductive nanosheets for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:3979–3983View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lei T, Chen W, Huang J, Yan C, Sun H, Wang C, Zhang W, Li Y, Xiong J (2017) Multi-functional layered WS2 nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1601843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen W, Qian T, Xiong J, Xu N, Liu X, Liu J, Zhou J, Shen X, Yang T, Chen Y, Yan C (2017) A new type of multifunctional polar binder: toward practical application of high energy lithium sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 1605160 doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605160
  26. Li G, Ling M, Ye Y, Li Z, Guo J, Yao Y, Zhu J, Lin Z, Zhang S (2015) Acacia Senegal–inspired bifunctional binder for longevity of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500878View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang J, Yao Z, Monroe CW, Yang J, Nuli Y (2013) Carbonyl- β -cyclodextrin as a novel binder for sulfur composite cathodes in rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv Funct Mater 23:1194–1201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yuan JK, Dang ZM, Yao SH, Zha JW, Zhou T, Li ST, Bai J (2010) Fabrication and dielectric properties of advanced high permittivity polyaniline/poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanohybrid films with high energy storage density. J Mater Chem 20:2441–2447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Dong Y, Li H, Zhao Z, Wu HB, Hao C, Liu S, Qiu J, Lou XW (2014) Enhancing lithium-sulphur battery performance by strongly binding the discharge products on amino-functionalized reduced graphene oxide. Nature Commun 5:5002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma L, Zhuang HL, Wei S, Hendrickson KE, Kim MS, Cohn G, Hennig RG, Archer LA (2015) Enhanced Li–S batteries using amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes in the cathode. ACS Nano 10:1050–1059View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim H, Han B, Choo J, Cho J (2008) Three-dimensional porous silicon particles for use in high-performance lithium secondary batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:10151–10154View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Q, Wang Y, Seh ZW, Fu Z, Zhang R, Cui Y (2015) Understanding the anchoring effect of Two-dimensional layered materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 15:3780–3786View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang H, Sencadas V, Gao G, Gao H, Du A, Liu H, Guo Z (2016) Strong affinity of polysulfide intermediates to multi-functional binder for practical application in lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 26:722–728View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hu YS, Demir-Cakan R, Titirici MM, Muller JO, Schlogl R, Antonietti M, Maier J (2008) Superior storage performance of a Si@SiOx/C nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:1645–1649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Du C (2011) Facile fabrication of a nanoporous silicon electrode with superior stability for lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:1037–1042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Chen R, Zhao T, Lu J, Wu F, Li L, Chen J, Tan G, Ye Y, Amine K (2013) Graphene-based three-dimensional hierarchical sandwich-type architecture for high-performance Li/S batteries. Nano Lett 13:4642–4649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim KJ, Jeong G, Kim JH, Jo YN, Hwang U, Kang S, Woo T, Kim YJ (2012) One-step synthesis of a sulfur-impregnated graphene cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:6796–6804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ahn W, Kim KB, Jung KN, Shin KH, Jin CS (2012) Synthesis and electrochemical properties of a sulfur-multi walled carbon nanotubes composite as a cathode material for lithium sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 202:394–399View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhi WS, Wang H, Hsu PC, Zhang Q, Li W, Zheng G (2014) Facile synthesis of li s–polypyrrole composite structures for high-performance li-s cathodes. Energy Environ Sci 7:672–676View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017