Open Access

Fabrication and Gas-Sensing Properties of Ni-Silicide/Si Nanowires

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:182

Received: 2 December 2016

Accepted: 24 February 2017

Published: 9 March 2017


Ni-silicide/Si nanowires were fabricated by atomic force microscope nano-oxidation on silicon-on-insulator substrates, selective wet etching, and reactive deposition epitaxy. Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire and Ni-silicide/Si heterostructure multi-stacked nanowire were formed by low- and high-coverage depositions of Ni, respectively. The Ni-silicide/Si Schottky junction and Ni-silicide region were attributed high- and low-resistance parts of nanowire, respectively, causing the resistance of the Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire and the Ni-silicide/Si heterostructure multi-stacked nanowire to be a little higher and much lower than that of Si nanowire. An O2 sensing device was formed from a nanowire that was mounted on Pt electrodes. When the nanowires exposed to O2, the increase in current in the Ni-silicide/Si heterostructure multi-stacked nanowire was much larger than that in the other nanowires. The Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire device had the highest sensitivity. The phenomenon can be explained by the formation of a Schottky junction at the Ni-silicide/Si interface in these two types of Ni-Silicide/Si nanowire and the formation of a hole channel at the silicon nanowire/native oxide interface after exposing the nanowires to O2.


Nanowire Sensor Si Silicide Schottky barrier Scanning probe lithography


Semiconductor nanowires (NWs) are ideal components of sensing devices because of their high surface-to-volume ratio [14].

Gas sensors that are based on Si nanostructures are emerging as very powerful because they are readily compatible with existing semiconductor processing technologies. In previous studies, Si nanostructures have been used to detect different gas molecules (such as NH3, NO, H2, O2, and NO2) [5]. The gas-sensing SiNW-based devices consist of both vertically standing [68] and in-plane-orientated SiNWs [915]. In-plane-orientated SiNW-based devices are more easily integrated into multifunction devices than are vertically standing SiNW-based ones. In-plane-orientated SiNW-based devices can be fabricated using two well-known methods. In the first, nanowires are grown by bottom-up fabrication or etching methods and then transferred onto a substrate; contact pads are then fabricated [911]. The second method is a top-down method in which large-scale patterns are formed on a substrate and the lateral dimensions reduced to the nanoscale by nanoimprinting [1214] or electron-beam lithography [15]; this method has the advantages of both reproducibility and reliability. In this work, the nanowires were fabricated by atomic force lithography and selective wet etching on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer, before the contact pads were fabricated.

With respect to in-plane-orientated nanowire-based devices, the sensing performance of metal oxide semiconductor nanowire is enhanced by functionalization with metal or semiconductor nanoparticles, because of the formation of nanosized Schottky or p-n junctions, which forms electron depletion regions within the nanowire, shrinking the effective conduction channel and effectively manipulating the local charge carrier concentration [1618].

Silicide/Si heterostructures are widely used for source/drain contacts and the low-resistivity interconnects of conventional silicon devices. They have been incorporated into Si nanowires. Nickel silicide/silicon contacts in silicon nanowires are Schottky junctions [19, 20] and can be used to fabricate multifunctional devices [21, 22].

In this work, a Ni-silicide nanocrystal was used to functionalize the Si nanowires, and the O2 sensing performance of the Si nanowires with Ni-silicide nanocrystals was compared with that of those without.


Figure 1 shows the process by which Ni-silicide nanocrystal-functionalized silicon nanowires are fabricated. SOI wafers that were fabricated by the Smart-Cut process were used. A p-type silicon top layer with a thickness of 55 nm and a resistance of about 0.12 Ω cm was insulated from the bulk silicon substrate by a 150-nm-thick buried oxide. The silicon layers were cleaned by a standard RCA process [23] and, then, dipped in a dilute HF solution before being nano-oxidized by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Nano-oxidation was performed using a commercial AFM (Solver PRO-M, NT-MDT) that was operated in the tapping mode using PtIr-coated silicon tips (under a constant force of about 3.3 N/m, at a resonance frequency of about 88 kHz). The Si nanowires were formed by immersing the nano-oxidized samples in the 20 wt% KOH solution at 50 °C for 40 s. The samples were dipped in a dilute HF solution to remove the native oxide layer on the surface of Si nanowires and immediately loaded into an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) mini-e-beam deposition chamber with a base pressure about 5 × 10−10 torr. Next, Ni films were deposited with the deposition rate of 0.01 Å/s at 400 °C. The deposition pressure was approximately 1 × 10−9 torr. Thereafter, the sample temperature was held at 400 °C for 1 h. The unreactive Ni atoms were removed using HNO3 solution. Al/Ti electrodes were fabricated using shadow mask on the substrate, and the two ends of the nanowire were fixed by the deposition of Pt using a focused ion beam. Finally, the formed devices were annealed at 300 °C for 30 s.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagrams of sample preparation. a Cleaned SOI substrate. b AFM oxidation. c Selected etching by KOH solution. d Selected etching by HF solution. e Ni deposition at elevated temperature. f Unreactive Ni atom removing by HNO3 solution

For O2 sensing experiments, nanowire device was placed in a vacuum furnace tube with the base pressure of 1 × 10−3 torr, in which the flux of the gases could be controlled. The sensitivity (S) was calculated as ΔI/I 0, where ΔI is the change in current that is induced by exposure of the device to the target gas atmosphere and I 0 is the initial current.

Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the control parameters for a periodic DC pulse (exposure time, t on, release time, t off, and oxidation voltage, V ox). The oxidation frequency, f, is defined as (t on + t off)−1. The exposure time is fixed at 1 ms, and various oxidation frequencies are used with different release times. Figure 3 shows the oxide lines that are written on the SOI substrate in the Si < 110 > direction with various oxidation frequencies at a sample voltage of 40 V and a scan speed of 0.1 μm/s. The temperature is room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Samples were put in a dry box, and the relative humidity is controlled at 45 ± 1%.
Fig. 2

Nomenclature for an AFM oxidation voltage pulse

Fig. 3

AFM image of the oxide lines that are written on the SOI substrate with various oxidation frequencies at a sample voltage of 40 V and a scan speed of 0.1 μm/s

Figure 4 plots the line profiles of the oxide lines indicating that when oxide frequency ≤1 Hz, the fluctuation in the height of the oxide line was periodic because the oxide protrusions were separated from each other by the application of periodic DC pulse power. The periodic fluctuation in the height of oxide line was not obvious at oxide frequency ≥2 Hz, indicating that the oxide protrusions overlapped. The relation between the roughness of the oxide line vs. oxide frequency, as shown in Fig. 5, shows that when frequency ≥3.98 Hz, the roughness was lower than when the oxide frequency = 2 Hz because a continuous uniform oxide line formed. Figure 6 plots the relationships between the height, width, and aspect ratio of oxide lines and the frequency of the DC pulse power. The height and width of the oxide line increased with the frequency.
Fig. 4

The image brightness profiles along the (a) aa′, (b) bb′, (c) cc′, (d) dd′, (e) ee′, (f) ff′, (g) gg′, (h) hh′, and (i) ii′ are shown in Fig. 3, in which the average height of the substrate is 0 nm, for the oxide lines written with 0.39, 1, 2, 3.98, 9.9, 13, 19, 47, and 90 Hz, respectively

Fig. 5

Roughness of oxide lines with various oxide frequencies (≥2 Hz). The roughness of the oxide lines is the roughness average, Ra, of the line profiles in Fig. 4ci

Fig. 6

The a height, b width, and c aspect ratio of the oxide line written with various oxide frequencies (≥3.98 Hz). Note: a is the average magnitude of the height of line profiles shown in Fig. 4di

Selective etching was performed by immersing the nano-oxidized sample in KOH solution. Since the ideal etching ratio of Si{100}:Si{111}:SiO2 is 450:1.125:1, a Si nanowire with {111}-plane sidewalls can be obtained [24, 25]. In this work, although the etching rate of the SPM oxide (SiO x ) is higher than that of the thermal oxide (SiO2), it is still much lower than that of the Si{100}. In order to form a continuous Si wire, a high enough oxide line is required [26]. In this work, the etching time of the 55-nm-thick Si layer was about 40 s using 20 wt% KOH solution at 50 °C. The height of oxide line must exceed 2 nm. A continuous Si wire was obtained by 40 s of selective etching, as shown in Fig. 7a. Thus, frequency ≥19 Hz was selected.
Fig. 7

SEM images of a Si nanowire and Si nanowires after reacting with Ni atoms that deposited with the Ni/Si atomic ratio of b 1/80 and c 1/8 at 400 °C

Then, Ni-silicide nanocrystals were formed on Si nanowires by reactive epitaxy to deposit Ni atoms at 400 °C with various Ni/Si atomic ratios. The Ni/Si atomic ratio was estimated based on only Ni film on top of the Si nanowire reacting with Si [26]. Figure 7b, c shows SEM images of Si nanowires after their reaction with Ni atoms with Ni/Si atomic ratios of 1/80 and 1/8, respectively. A nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire (NMSiNW) was formed when the Ni/Si atomic ratio was 1/80, as shown in Fig. 7b. The size of Ni-silicide nanocrystals was smaller than 100 nm. When the Ni/Si atomic ratio was increased to 1/8, the size of the Ni-silicide crystals were increased, forming Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire (MSHNW), as shown in Fig. 7c.

Three devices that were based on Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire, Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire, and Si nanowire were carried out in a vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 1 × 10−3 torr. The current was measured using a bias voltage of 10 V. When the temperature was increased to 250 °C, the current increased gradually, reaching a stable value after about 1 h of holding at that temperature. This phenomenon indicates that when the nanowire was in air, water condensed on its surface revealing in turn that the p-type Si nanowire exhibited high resistance [27]. When the nanowire was placed in the vacuum and heated, the water that condensed on its surface was desorbed. Thus, the resistance of the nanowire decreased, causing the current to increase. After 1 h, all of the water was desorbed and the current reached a stable value.

The resistances of Si nanowire, Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire, and Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire at 250 °C in vacuum were 2 × 1010, 2.5 × 1010, and 3.3 × 109 Ω, respectively. The resistances of the Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire and Ni-silicide multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire were a little higher and much lower than that of the Si nanowire, for the following reason. Since the Ni-silicide grew into Si nanowire, two factors affect the resistance of that nanowire. One is the formation of Ni-silicide/Si interface with a Schottky characteristic, which can increase the resistance of nanowire. Furthermore, the formation of the nanoscopic depletion region in the Schottky junction reduces the cross-sectional area for carrier transmission in the Si region, increasing the resistance of nanowire. The other factor is that nanowire contains a low resistance Ni-silicide phase. Since the resistivity of Ni-silicide is much lower than that of Si, according to the resistivity-mixture rule, the resistance of the nanowire can be reduced. Thus, in the Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire, the former factor has a greater effect on the resistance of nanowire than the latter factor. However, the amount of the Ni-silicide phase in the multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire is much more than that in the Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire. The latter factor dominates.

Figure 8 shows that as the duration of exposure to oxygen, the measured current increased rapidly at first and then slowly until reaching a stable value. Similarly, when the oxygen was pumped out, the current recovered rapidly at first and then slowly. The increase and recovery of the current at two rates are attributed to a native oxide (SiO x , x < 2) on the nanowire surface. When oxygen was injected in vacuum chamber, O adsorbed on the native oxide surface at first, the current increased rapidly, and, then, O diffused into the native oxide layer, causing the current to increase slowly. Similarly, fast desorption of O on the native oxide surface and its diffusion out from the native oxide layer caused the fast and then slow recovery of current, respectively, when the oxygen was pumped out of the chamber.
Fig. 8

a Current and b sensitivity of the oxygen detection recorded at 250 °C for the Si nanowire (SiNW), Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire (NMSiNW), and Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire (MSHNW)

A schematic description of the sensing mechanism of three types of nanowire-based O2 sensors is depicted in Fig. 9. The increase in current in the wire can be attributed to the absorption of oxygen species on the nanowire, resulting in a net negative charge on its surface as a molecular gate. Thus, holes aggregated at the silicon nanowire/native-oxide interface and formed a hole channel, effectively reducing its resistance. However, an increase in the hole concentration reduces the energy barrier at Ni-silicide/Si interface. Thus, the increase in current that is achieved using Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire was greater than those achieved using Si nanowire. When the Ni/Si ratio to 1/8 was further increased, forming Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire, the change in current further increased, as shown in Table 1. The initial current in Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire was much larger than that in nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire. That is a probable reason for the sensitivity drop (Fig. 8b) by using from nanocrystal-modified Si NW to Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire.
Fig. 9

Schematic diagram of the working principle of different nanowire devices before and after being exposed to O2. a Si nanowire. b Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire. c Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire

Table 1

The change in current (∆I) and sensitivity (S) of Si nanowire (SiNW), Ni-silicide nanocrystal modified Si nanowire (NMSiNW), and Ni-silicide/Si multi-stacked heterostructure nanowire (MSHNW) devices exposed to 750 ppm O2


I (A)



0.9 × 10−9



1.4 × 10−9



7.5 × 10−9


However, the sensitivity of the nanowires may be influenced when exposed in O2 that mix with water. Previous reports show that the resistance of Si nanowire change when Si nanowire was operated in ambient air with various relative humidity [27] or with various pH values [28]. Furthermore, the influence decreases with the increase of temperature [27]. In this work, O2 sensing is operated at 250 °C. Therefore, we infer that the influence of H2O on the sensitivity when operating in 250 °C may be slighter than that when operating in room temperature.


Si nanowires were fabricated by AFM nano-oxidation on silicon-on-insulator substrates and selective wet etching. Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire and Ni-silicide/Si heterostructure multi-stacked nanowire were formed by depositing Ni with Ni/Si atomic ratio of 1/80 and 1/8, respectively, at 400 °C on Si nanowires. Since the Ni-silicide grew into Si nanowire, the Ni-silicide/Si Schottky junction and Ni-silicide region were attributed high- and low-resistance parts of nanowire, respectively, causing the resistance of the Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire and the Ni-silicide/Si heterostructure multi-stacked nanowire to be a little higher and much lower than that of the Si nanowire. An O2 sensing device was formed from a nanowire that was mounted on Pt electrodes. The change in current in Ni-silicide/Si nanowire increases with the amount of Ni-silicide nanocrystal in the Si nanowire after the exposure of the nanowire to O2. The Ni-silicide nanocrystal-modified Si nanowire device had the highest sensitivity. The phenomenon can be explained by the formation of a Schottky junction at the Ni-silicide/Si interface in the Ni-Silicide/Si nanowires and the formation of a hole channel at the silicon nanowire/native oxide interface after exposing nanowires to O2.

To the author’s knowledge, no prior work has been reported on the gas-sensing properties of Ni-silicide/Si nanowires. More work is required to guarantee selectivity, long-time reliability, and stability in the Ni-silicide/Si nanowires.



We thank Prof. Ping-Hung Yeh (Tamkang Univ., Dept. Phys., Taiwan) for fruitful discussions.


This work was supported financially by funding from the Republic of China Ministry of Science and Technology Grants 105-2221-E-005-024-

Authors’ Contributions

HFH was involved in the design, data analyzing, and manuscript writing. CAC and SWL carried out the nanowire formation experiments. CAC and CKT performed the gas-sensing property measurements. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chung Hsing University


  1. Yu P, Wu J, Liu S, Xiong J, Jagadish C, Wang ZM (2016) Design and fabrication of silicon nanowires towards efficient solar cells. Nano Today 11:704–737View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen X, Wong Cell KY, Yuan CA, Zhang G (2013) Nanowire-based gas sensors. Sen Actuators B 177:178–195View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Huan XJ, Choi YK (2007) Chemical sensors based on nanostructured materials. Sens Actuators B 122:659–671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Niranjan RS, Yang Y, Margit Z (2010) Nanowire-based sensors. Small 6:1705–1722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Serdar O, Gole JL (2007) The potential of porous silicon gas sensors. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 11:92–100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Peng KQ, Wang X, Lee ST (2009) Gas sensing properties of single crystalline porous silicon nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 95:243112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Noh JS, Kim H, Kim BS, Lee E, Cho HH, Lee W (2011) High-performance vertical hydrogen sensors using Pd-coated rough Si nanowires. J Mater Chem 21:15935–15939View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Naama S, Hadjersi T, Keffous A, Nezzal G (2015) CO2 gas sensor based on silicon nanowires modified with metal nanoparticles. Mater Sci Semi Process 38:367–372View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mcalpine CM, Ahmad H, Wang D, Heath JR (2007) Highly ordered nanowire arrays on plastic substrates for ultrasensitive flexible chemical sensors. Nature Mater 6:379–384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen ZH, Jie JS, Luo LB, Wang H, Lee CS, Lee ST (2007) Applications of silicon nanowires functionalized with palladium nanoparticles in hydrogen sensors. Nanotechnology 18:345502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Skucha K, Fan Z, Jeon K, Javey A, Boser B (2010) Palladium/silicon nanowire Schottky barrier-based hydrogen sensors. Sen Actuators B 145:232–238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wana J, Shao-Ren Deng SR, Yang R, Shu Z, Lu BR, Xie SQ, Chen Y, Huq E, Liu R, Qu XP (2009) Silicon nanowire sensor for gas detection fabricated by nanoimprint on SU8/SiO2/PMMA trilayer. Microelectron Eng 86:1238–1242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao C, Deng SR, Wana J, Lu BR, Liu R, Huq E, Xin-Ping Qu XP, Chen Y (2010) 22 nm silicon nanowire gas sensor fabricated by trilayer nanoimprint and wet etching. Microelectron Eng 87:927–930View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao C, Xu ZC, Deng SR, Wana J, Chen Y, Liu R, Huq E, Qu XP (2011) Silicon nanowires by combined nanoimprint and angle deposition for gas sensing applications microelectron. Eng 88:2100–2104Google Scholar
  15. Yun J, Jin CY, Ahn JH, Jeon S, Park I (2013) A self-heated silicon nanowire array: selective surface modification with catalytic nanoparticles by nanoscale Joule heating and its gas sensing applications. Nanoscale 5:6851–6856View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolmakov A, Klenov DO, Lilach Y, Stemmer S, Moskovits M (2005) Enhanced gas sensing by individual SnO2 nanowires and nanobelts functionalized with Pd catalyst particles. Nano Lett 5:667–673View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Qian LH, Wanga K, Lia Y, Fang HT, Lua QH, Ma XL (2006) CO sensor based on Au-decorated SnO2 nanobelt. Mater Chem Phys 100:82–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mashock M, Yu K, Cui S, Mao S, Lu G, Chen J (2012) Modulating gas sensing properties of CuO nanowires through creation of discrete nanosized p-n junctions on their surfaces. Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4192–4199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Woodruff SM, Dellas NS, Liu BZ, Eichfeld SM, Mayer TS, Redwing JM, Mohney SE (2008) Nickel and nickel silicide Schottky barrier contacts to n-type silicon nanowires. J Vac Sci Technol B 26:1592–1596View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong SH, Kang MG, Kim BS, Kim DS, Ahn JH, Whang D, Sull SH, Hwang SW (2001) Electrical characteristics of nickel silicide–silicon heterojunction in suspended silicon nanowires. Solid-State Electro 56:130–134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mongillo M, Spathis P, Katsaros G, Gentile P, De Franceschi S (2012) Multifunctional devices and logic gates with undoped silicon nanowires. Nano Lett 12:3074–3079View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Glassner S, Zeiner C, Periwal P, Baron T, Bertagnolli E, Lugstein A (2014) Multimode silicon nanowire transistors. Nano Lett 14:6699–6703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kern W, Puotinen DA (1970) Cleaning solutions based on hydrogen. RCA Rev 31:187–206Google Scholar
  24. Seidel H, Csepregi L, Heuberger A, Baumgartel H (1990) Anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon in alkaline solutions: I. Orientation dependence and behavior of passivation layers. J Electrochem Soc 137:3612–3626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bassous E (1978) Fabrecation of novel three-dimensional microstructures by the anisotropic etching of (100) and (110) silion. IEEE Trans Electron Devices ED-25:1178–1184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen TH, Hsu HF, Wu HY (2012) Formation of Ni-silicide nanowires on slicon-on-insulator substrates by atomic force microscope lithography and solid phase reaction. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 1:P90–P93View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsueh HT, Hsueh TJ, Chang SJ, Hung FY, Weng WY, Hsu CL, Dai BT (2011) Si nanowire-based humidity sensors prepared on glass substrate. IEEE Sens J 11:3036–3041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yuan GD, Zhou YB, Guo CS, Zhang WJ, Tang YB, Li YQ, Chen ZH, He ZB, Zhang XJ, Wang PF, Bello I, Zhang RQ, Lee CS, Lee ST (2010) Tunable electrical properties of silicon nanowires via surface-ambient chemistry. ACS Nano 4:3045–3052View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017