Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Microstructure of Spark Plasma-Sintered Silicon Nitride Ceramics

  • O. A. Lukianova1,
  • V. Yu. Novikov1,
  • A. A. Parkhomenko2Email author,
  • V. V. Sirota1 and
  • V. V. Krasilnikov1
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:293

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2067-z

Received: 3 January 2017

Accepted: 11 April 2017

Published: 24 April 2017

Abstract

The microstructure and phase composition of the high-content Al2O3-Y2O3-doped spark plasma-sintered silicon nitride were investigated. Fully dense silicon nitride ceramics with a typical α-Si3N4 equiaxed structure with average grain size from 200 to 530 nm, high elastic modulus of 288 GPa, and high hardness of 2038 HV were spark plasma sintered (SPSed) at 1550 °C. Silicon nitride with elongated β-Si3N4 grains, higher hardness of 1800 HV, density of 3.25 g/cm3, and Young’s modulus 300 GPa SPSed at 1650 °C was also reviewed.

Keywords

Silicon nitrideSpark plasma sinteringMicrostructureHardness

Background

Silicon nitride and SiAlON ceramics are promising engineering and structural ceramics due to their benefit combination of mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. Silicon nitride ceramics can be successfully used for a wide range of applications where metals and polymers fail. For the manufacture of dense Si3N4, such sintering additives as aluminum oxide, yttrium oxide, or magnesium oxide are generally added to the original powder.

The most well-known commercial methods of Si3N4 production are a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and spark plasma sintering (SPS). SPS which is one of the most innovative and promising methods of producing silicon nitride means sintering and sinter-bonding at low temperatures and short periods by charging the intervals between powder particles with electrical energy and effectively applying a high-temperature spark plasma. SPS systems offer many advantages over conventional systems using hot press (HP) sintering, HIP, or atmospheric furnaces, including ease of operation and accurate control of sintering energy as well as high sintering speed, high reproducibility, safety, and reliability. It is well known that an important role is played by the type of structure obtained by SPS. For instance, Peng have shown that using conventional hot pressing Y- and Yb-stabilized monophasic α-SiAlONs with stoichiometric composition retains the equiaxed morphology even at very high temperatures [1]. Peng also note that conditions suitable for elongated grain growth have never been established in such systems because of the lack of the formation and subsequent decomposition of intermediate phases during sintering. It should also be noted that the elongated morphology formation of structure is strongly controlled by such factors as a temperature and/or an extra liquid. However, there are two main points. First of all, in the absence of nitrogen overpressure, the silicon nitride dissociation begins above 1900 °C, and secondly, a large amount of liquid which later becomes the glass phase may reduce high-temperature properties of silicon nitride [1]. The spark plasma sintering is a modified method of hot pressing. SPS means a direct transmission of electric current directly through the mold and the pressed workpiece, and not through the external heater in comparison with the HP. Fast heating and short cycle times are achieved by a pulsed electric current and a so-called spark plasma effect.

In particular, these ceramics have high strength and relatively high fracture toughness, good wear resistance, and high oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance. Silicon nitride is being considered for a wide variety of structural application, such as the gas turbine engine, the next-generation power devices, turbocharger rotors, and diesel engine components [26].

The goal of this paper is to consider features of the microstructure and properties of the produced silicon nitride ceramics with a high content of yttrium and aluminum oxides. Spark plasma-sintered silicon nitride Al2O3-and-Y2O3-doped ceramics were selected as a material for the present investigation. The article refers also to free sintered silicon nitride Al2O3-Y2O3-doped ceramics.

Methods

The starting Si3N4 powder was α-rich Si3N4 (Stark, Grade M11). Oxide-sintering additives were Y2O3 (Stark, Grade, 2 μm) and nanosized Al2O3 (A16 SG, 600 nm). Table 1 shows the initial ratio of the components. To assure a thorough homogeneity, the vibratory disc milling (Retsch RS-200) containing powder mixtures had also been performed for 20 min. The SPS process was carried out in a vacuum in a spark plasma-sintering apparatus, Dr. Sinter 2050 (Sumitomo Coal Mining Co. Ltd., Japan). The precursor powders were loaded in a cylindrical carbon die with an inner diameter of 20 mm. The samples were heated by passing a pulsed DC current through the pressurized die, i.e., using the die also as a heating source. The final sintering temperature was 1550 and 1650 °C with a 10-min holding time. The temperature was controlled by an optical pyrometer focused on the surface of the die. A pressure of 50 MPa was maintained throughout the sintering cycle.
Table 1

Chemical composition of the starting materials

Si3N4, wt%

Al2O3 wt%

Y2O3 wt%

Holding time, min

85

9

6

10

The phase composition of the sintered samples was determined by the X-ray diffraction method (XRD, diffractometer Rigaku Ultima IV; Cu Kα emission (radiation), Ni filter). A scan rate of 10 °C/min was used to record the diffraction patterns in 2θ range between 10 and 80 °C. XRD analyses were carried out using a Rigaku Ultima IV automated diffractometer. The sintered material was analyzed in the solid form.

For the Vickers indentations, the samples of approximately 60 mm-20 mm-30 mm in size were polished with diamond paste on a standard metallographic wheel, using 6- and 3-μm diamond pastes. Vickers indentations were made at 30-N loads using an automatic microhardness analysis system DM-8 and a loading time of 15 s. The indentation sizes were measured immediately after unloading. A total of 25 perfect indentations were made at each load with the Vickers indenter.

The microstructure was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Structural characterization was performed using a Quanta 600 FEG (FEI company, Hillsboro, OR) scanning electron microscope. Since the silicon nitride material under investigation was non-conducting, it was necessary to coat it with a thin layer of carbon to prevent surface charging during examination.

Density of the samples was determined by a helium pycnometer (Micromeritics AccuPyc 1340). The indentation module (Young’s modulus) was measured using an automated Shimadzu DUH-211/DUH-211S.

Results and Discussion

On the one hand, one of the most important advantages of ceramics is their low weight. But on the other hand, it is obvious that the high density and low porosity are key factors for many structural applications. For both sets of samples, the lack of porosity has been found (Table 2). The density of the described samples SPSed at 1550 °C was 3.21 g/cm3 by helium pycnometry, and it was 3.25 g/cm3 for samples SPSed at 1650 °C. All specimens were sintered to nearly full density (Table 2). It is obvious that the density of ceramics depends on porosity and on the pore size. Thus, ceramics produced by SPS and HIP methods have the highest density close to the theoretical one [6]. Belmonte et al. described silicon nitride ceramics obtained by SPS with a density of 3.08 g/cm3 sintered at 1500 °C and ceramics with a density of 3.23 g/cm3 sintered at 1600 °C and also ceramics sintered at 1650 °C with a density of 3.23 g/cm3, respectively [2]. Balázsi et al. described carbon nanotube-reinforced silicon nitride composites obtained by SPS with the density from 3.17 to 3.24 g/cm3 [7]. Hayashi et al. described ceramic material obtained by sintering in a graphite resistance furnace at 1900 °C for 2 to 48 h under a nitrogen pressure of 0.9 MPa with a density ranged from 3.20 to 3.26 g/cm3 with MgSiN2 as an additive and with a density ranged from 3.22 to 3.30 g/cm3 with MgO as an additive [4].
Table 2

Physical properties

SPS temperature, °C

ρ, g/cm3

Porosity

1550

3.21

1650

3.25

The hardness of silicon nitride ceramics is high and linearly depends on the strength properties. Figure 1a, b illustrates two typical Vickers fingerprints. An indentation load has been chosen experimentally. The hardness of the obtained material was 2038 HV for ceramics SPSed at 1550 °C and 1800 HV for ceramics SPSed at 1650 °C (Table 3). For instance, the microhardness of the Si3N4 composite with 3 wt% CNT was 12 GPa (1224 HV) [8]. Silicon nitride ceramics a priori have high hardness especially for ceramics produced by such methods as HP, HIP, SN and SPS [9, 10]. It is also known that the hardness of α-Si3N4 is higher than the hardness of β-Si3N4 [1]. Balázsi et al. described the carbon nanotube-reinforced silicon nitride composites obtained by SPS with a microhardness from 1660 to 2010 HV [8].
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Vickers fingerprints of the SPSed Si3N4 with Al2O3-Y2O3 at a 1550 °C and b 1650 °C

Table 3

Mechanical properties

Sintering temperature, °C

E IT, GPa

Hardness, HV

1550

288

2038

1650

300

1800

The microhardness 16.6 GPa and the elastic modulus 285 GPa of the carbon nanotube-reinforced Si3N4 with 4 wt% Al2O3 and 6 wt% Y2O3 were significantly lower than without it [3].

The indentation modulus of the investigated material SPSed at 1550 °C was 288 GPa and 300 GPa for the material sintered at 1650 °C (Table 3). Load–displacement curves are shown in Fig. 2. Usually, the indentation modulus has the same value as Young’s modulus. For comparison, Young’s modulus for the same free sintered material was 240 GPa by resonance tests and 244 GPa by indentation modulus [11].
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Load–displacement curves

Young’s modulus of the HIPed silicon nitride was 320 GPa while Young’s modulus of the sintered silicon nitride was 290 GPa [2]. In our previous article, we described the silicon nitride pressureless sintered with Young’s modulus of 214 GPa [11]. Young’s modulus of spark plasma-sintered carbon nanotube-reinforced silicon nitride composites with 4 wt% Al2O3 and 6 wt% Y2O3 ranged from 286 to 326 GPa, and the shear modulus ranged from 115 to 130 GPa depending on the content of the multiwall carbon nanotubes [7].

Balázsi et al. described the HPed silicon nitride with low Young’s modulus of 150 GPa and low density compared with the density and Young’s modulus of the spark plasma-sintered silicon nitride [7, 8].

Shimada et al. described the high-temperature dependence of Young’s modulus with 3 wt% MgO fabricated by pressureless sintering in a nitrogen gas silicon nitride at 1750 °C. Young’s modulus decreased from 370 to 330 GPa with an increasing temperature up to 800 °C [12].

It is obvious that the phase composition clearly depend on such sintering parameters as the temperature of the sintering and the holding time on the one hand and the type and amount of the sintering agents on the other hand. Shen et al. described the Si3N4 ceramics SPSed at 1600 °C (holding time from 0 to 5 min) and sintered at 1700 °C. The α-Si3N4 and β-silicon nitride for pure α-Si3N4 powder without additives was observed. β-Si3N4 and β-SiAlON were observed at 1700 °C without holding time for initial β-SiAlON composition with AlN and Al2O3 additives. α-Si3N4 were observed after 5-min sintering at 1700 °C with high content of Yb2O3. However, β-silicon nitride and glass phase were observed at 1600 and 1700 °C without holding. Only β-Si3N4 and glass phase were observed after 5 min sintering at 1700 °C [13]. Perera et al. described the Si3N4/SiC composites SPSed at 1500 °C with a phase composition consisting of α-Si3N4 and β-Si3N4 and open porosity of 24%. Increase of the sintering temperature from 1650 to 1900 °C leads to increase of the β-phase content and decrease of the α-phase content [6]. Corral et al. described single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT–Si3N4) nanocomposites processed using 1-, 2-, and 6-vol.% SWNTs and SPS [3].

Balázsi et al. showed a similar comparison with the described material with 10 wt% Al2O3 and Y2O3 oxide additives. A single-phase β-SiAlON nanoceramic Si5AlON7 has been prepared by high-energy mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering at 1550 °C for 5 min. An amorphous Si–C–N powder was used to obtain polycrystalline Si3N4/SiC ceramic composites. Optimal temperature for sintering was 1600 °C, and the primary phases were β-Si3N4 and β-SiC with approximately equal proportions of the two phases, along with minor phases such as silicon oxynitride, yttrium silicate, and some free carbon [8].

Peng also show that aluminum-and-yttrium-doped spark plasma-sintered silicon nitride ceramics had a 59% un-reacted α-Si3N4, 13% β-SiAlON, and 28% α-SiAlON [1]. The described ceramic sample that had α-Si3N4 (76%) as a major phase and β-Si3N4 (24%) as a minor phase for ceramics was SPSed at 1550 °C, and conversely, the ceramic sample that had β-Si3N4 (72%) as a major phase and α-Si3N4 (28%) as a minor phase for ceramics was sintered at 1650 °C (Fig. 3 and Table 4). The quantitative phase composition of the produced ceramics and such characteristics as the crystal lattice parameters and the space symmetry group are given in Table 4. Balázsi et al. investigated samples SPSed for 3 min at 1500 °C and 50 MPa with main lines of α-Si3N4 and small additions of β-Si3N4 and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWNT)–Si3N4 samples sintered by SPS for 5 min at 1500 °C and 100 MPa which showed main lines of α- and β-Si3N4. The sample sintered by SPS for 5 min at 1650 °C and 50 MPa demonstrated main lines of α-Si3N4 and β-Si3N4. The MWNT-doped Si3N4 sintered by SPS for 3 min at 1650 °C and 50 MPa was characterized by main lines of α-Si3N4 and small additions of β-Si3N4 [7]. The content of the α-Si3N4 phase changes from 76 to 6% depending on the sintering temperature of 1500 to 1650 °C, respectively [2].
Figure 3
Fig. 3

The X-ray analysis of the fabricated ceramics

Table 4

XRD and characteristics of the obtained phases

  

The lattice constant, Å

Phase, %

a

c

1550

1650

β-Si3N4

P63 (173)

7.629

2.927

24

72

α-Si3N4

P31c (159)

7.753

5.624

76

28

The fully dense compacts obtained at 1550 °C consist of nearly equiaxed grains of sub-micron size. The typical α-Si3N4 ultrafine equiaxed hexagonal grained microstructures formed after SPS at 1550 °C. The average grain size is changed from 200 to 530 nm. By contrast, randomly selected ultrafine equiaxed and elongated β-grain microstructures developed by sintering at 1650 °C are fairly uniform. The glass phase at the grain boundaries and the lack of porosity were also observed for the both investigated ceramics (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Microstructure of Si3N4 SPSed at a 1550 °C and b 1650 °C

A grain-coarsening process (Fig. 4a in comparison to Fig. 4b), which can be directly attributed to thermally activated fast-growing process governed by dynamic Ostwald ripening, is observed. The grain growth is accompanied by α-β Si3N4 transformation in the sintering processes (Fig. 4). However, the influence of additives on the microstructure of similar material obtained by free sintering was described in our earlier work [1417]. The negative effect of magnesium oxide on the structure of pressureless sintered ceramics was also shown earlier [17].

Conclusions

In keeping with the results summarized above, the silicon nitride ceramic with a high content of sintering additives was produced by spark plasma sintering at 1550 and 1650 °C. The microstructure, phase composition, and mechanical and elastic properties of the produced ceramics were investigated. Proposed technology can be potentially applied in various fields of technology and industry in production of structural ceramics based on silicon nitride. By selecting appropriate compositions and sintering parameters, fully dense ceramics with tailored microstructures can be obtained, which consist of either submicron-sized grains with equiaxed morphology or well-facetted grains with elongated morphology. This opens up new possibilities for further materials development. It has been demonstrated that SPS is an efficient technique to implement this concept.

The results can be summarized as follows:
  1. 1.

    The density of the obtained material was in the narrow range from 3.21 to 3.25 g/cm3.

     
  2. 2.

    The hardness of the produced ceramics was 2038 HV for SPS at 1550 °C and 1800 HV for SPS at 1650 °C. The indentation modulus was 288 GPa for ceramics SPSed at 1550 °C and 300 GPa for material SPSed at 1650 °C.

     
  3. 3.

    The described ceramics SPSed at 1550 °C had α-Si3N4 as a major phase, and conversely, ceramics SPSed at 1650 °C had β-Si3N4 as a major phase.

     

Abbreviations

CNT: 

Carbon nanotubes

HIP: 

Hot isostatic pressing

HP: 

Hot pressing

MWNT: 

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

RFBR: 

Russian Foundation for Basic Research

SEM: 

Scanning electron microscopy

SN: 

Sintering

SPS: 

Spark plasma sintering

SWNT: 

Single-walled carbon nanotubes

XRD: 

X-ray diffraction

Declarations

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project no. 16-32-00430 мoл_a.

Authors’ Contributions

OAL performed the measurements and drafted the manuscript. AAP and VVK discussed the results. VVS and VYuN helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia
(2)
Institute of Solid State Physics, Materials Science and Technologies, NAS of Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine

References

  1. Peng H (2004) Spark plasma sintering of Si3N4-based ceramics: sintering mechanism-tailoring microstructure-evaluating proper: doctoral dissertation: S-10691. Department of Inorganic Chemistry Stockholm University, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  2. Belmonte M, González-Julián J, Miranzo P, Osendi MI (2010) Spark plasma sintering: a powerful tool to develop new silicon nitride-based materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 30:2937–2946View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Corral EL, Wang H, Garay J, Munir Z, Barrera EV (2011) Effect of single-walled carbon nanotubes on thermal and electrical properties of silicon nitride processed using spark plasma sintering. J Eur Ceram Soc 31:391–400View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hayashi H, Hirao K, Toriyama M, Kanzaki S (2001) MgSiN2 addition as a means of increasing the thermal conductivity of silicon nitride. J Am Ceram Soc 84:3060–62View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosneara AH, Bhuyan AH (2012) Structural and electrical properties of reaction bonded silicon nitride ceramics. Open Cer Sci Jour 2:1–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Perera DS, Tokita M, Moricca S (1998) Comparative study of fabrication of Si3N4/SiC composites by spark plasma sintering and hot isostatic pressing. J Eur Ceram Soc 18:401–404View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Balázsi Cs, Shen Z, Kónya Z, Kasztovszky Zs,Wéber F, Vértesy Z,  Biró LP, Kiricsi I, Arató P (2005) Processing of carbon nanotube reinforced silicon nitride composites by spark plasma sintering. Comp Sci and Tech 65:727–733Google Scholar
  8. Balázsi C, Tapasztó O, Károly Z, Kun P, Balázsi K, Szépvölgyi J (2013) Structural and mechanical properties of milled si3n4/cnts composites by spark plasma sintering method. Mat Sci For 729:31–36Google Scholar
  9. Munz D, Fett T (1999) Ceramics: mechanical properties, failure behavior, materials selection. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jansen M (2002) High Performance Non-Oxide Ceramics II. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. Lukianova O (2015) Mechanical and elastic properties of new silicon nitride ceramics produced by cold isostatic pressing and free sintering. Ceramurg Int 41:13716–13720View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shimada M, Matsushitas M, Kuratan H, Kamoto T, Tsukuma M, Ukidate T (1984) Temperature-dependence of Young modulus and internal-friction in alumina, silicon-nitride, and partially stabilized zirconia ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2:23–24Google Scholar
  13. Shen Z, Nygren M (2011) Kinetic aspects of superfast consolidation of silicon nitride based ceramics by spark plasma sintering. J Mater Chem 11:204–207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Krasil’nikov VV, Sirota VV, Ivanov AS, Kozlova LN, Luk’yanova OA, Ivanisenko VV (2014) Investigation of the structure of Si3N4-based ceramic with Al2O3 and Y2O3 additives. Glas Ceram 1:17–19Google Scholar
  15. Sirota V, Krasilnikov V, Lukianova O (2013) Fabrication of the ceramics based on silicon nitride by free sintering and cold isostatic pressing. NANOCON 2013—conference proceedings, 5th international conference., pp 248–251Google Scholar
  16. Lukianova OA, Krasilnikov VV, Parkhomenko AA, Sirota VV (2016) Microstructure and phase composition of cold isostatically pressed and pressureless sintered silicon nitride. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:148View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sirota V, Lukianova O, Krasilnikov V, Selemenev V, Dokalov V (2016) Microstructural and physical properties of magnesium oxide-doped silicon nitride ceramics. Results in Physics 6:82–83View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement