- Nano Express
- Open Access
Modeling the Effects of Nanopatterned Surfaces on Wetting States of Droplets
© The Author(s). 2017
- Received: 31 March 2017
- Accepted: 16 April 2017
- Published: 26 April 2017
An analytic thermodynamic model has been established to quantitatively investigate the wetting states of droplets on nanopatterned surfaces. Based on the calculations for the free energies of droplets with the Wenzel state and the Cassie-Baxter state, it is found that the size and shape of nanostructured surfaces play crucial roles in wetting states. In detail, for nanohole-patterned surfaces, the deep and thin nanoholes lead to the Cassie-Baxter state, and contrarily, the shallow and thick nanoholes result in the Wenzel state. However, the droplets have the Wenzel state on the patterned surfaces with small height and radii nanopillars and have the Cassie-Baxter state when the height and radii of nanopillars are large. Furthermore, the intuitive phase diagrams of the wetting states of the droplet in the space of surface geometrical parameters are obtained. The theoretical results are in good agreement with the experimental observations and reveal physical mechanisms involved in the effects of nanopatterned surfaces on wetting states, which implies that these studies may provide useful guidance to the conscious design of patterned surfaces to control the wetting states of droplets.
- Nanopatterned superhydrophobic surface
- Thermodynamic method
- Wetting state
- Free energy
Hydrophobic materials can be turned into superhydrophobic ones if their surfaces are decorated with micro- or nanocorrugations. Superhydrophobic surfaces have attracted much interest in both fundamental research and industry. This is mainly due to their unique wetting properties and promising technologic application, e.g., in coating, slef-cleaning, and ultra liquid repellent [1–8]. In reality, the superhydrophobicity of lotus leaves is owing to their own hierarchical pillared structure; more specifically, a solid surface can be significantly enhanced by the presence of nano- or micro-scale pillars . On the other hand, the superhydrophobicity also can be influenced by the coulomb repulsion at nanometer-sized contact . A water droplet sitting on a micro-structure surface generally fully wets the substrate topography or is suspended atop the surface topography without penetration, namely, either is the Wenzel (W)  state or Cassie-Baxter (CB)  state.
Understanding the mechanism of the wetting transition between the W and CB states on nanodecorated surfaces is of essential importance for the design and fabrication of nanostructured surfaces. Much effort has been devoted to this issue in recent years in experiments [13–15] and theories [16–20]. Experimentally, Martines et al.  investigated the hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and sliding behavior of water droplets on nanoasperities of controlled dimensions and found that the droplet is in the CB state on the pillared surface with large radii and height, but the droplet is in the W state when the pillar radii and height are small. He et al.  fabricated a series of micro-rod surfaces with different geometric parameters to study the relationship between micro-rod geometry and wetting state transition and found the similar phenomenon with that observed by Martines et al. Theoretically, based on energy balance, Patankar  studied how the surface roughness impacts the wetting state transition of a droplet from a higher energy of the CB state to a lower energy of the W state. Bhushan and Jung  demonstrated that hierarchical roughness can result in different superhydrophobic states due to the effects of multiscale roughness on the droplet wetting. In addition, for a pillar-patterned surface, Extrand  and Wang and Chen  respectively proposed some theoretical criterions to predict wetting states of droplets according the surface geometrical morphology. In spite of much progress in experiments and theories, the effects of the nanopatterned surfaces on wetting states of droplets have not been well understood and there are some fundamental issues in the wetting phenomena on nanopatterned surfaces. For example, the specific relations between the wetting states and geometrical morphology of the patterned surface are unclear, especially for the nano- and micro-holed surfaces. An intuitive phase diagram of wetting states of a droplet in the space of surface geometrical parameters is eagerly expected.
In order to address these problems, in this paper, we took two typical nanodecorated surfaces as an example, i.e., periodic nanohole-patterned surface and nanopillar-patterned surface, respectively. By calculating the free energy difference between the W and CB states, the dependence of wetting behaviors on the periodic nanopatterned geometrical parameters is studied. In detail, we found that for nanohole-patterned surfaces, they tend to be in Cassie-Baxter state as the hole is higher and thinner and tend to be in the Wenzel state as the hole is shorter and thicker. However, for nanopillar-patterned surfaces, the short and thin nanoholes lead to the Wenzel state, and contrarily, the long and thick nanoholes result in the Cassie-Baxter state. In addition, we discussed in detail the intrinsic mechanism of the wetting states of droplets on different patterned surfaces. Furthermore, the intuitive phase diagrams of wetting states of the droplet on different patterned surfaces are obtained. In this way, the phase diagrams offer a simple method to evaluate the wetting states of droplets on nanopatterned surfaces.
Analytical Model of Nanohole-Patterned Surface
With the aim of investigating the influence of geometrical morphology parameters of nanohole-patterned surfaces on wetting states, the free energy of the W and CB states are calculated according to Eqs. (5) and (10). Furthermore, in order to obtain a phase diagram of wetting states of a water droplet on a nanohole-patterned surface, the free energy difference between the W and CB states are calculated. Here, we define the free energy difference between the W and CB states as ΔE = E W − E CB. Thus, by combining Eqs. (5) and (10), the free energy difference can be obtained as ΔE h = E W-h − E CB-h for a nanohole-patterned analytical model. When ΔE h > 0, i.e., E CB-h < E W-h, it indicates that the CB state will be the final equilibrium state. When ΔE h < 0, it implies that the W state is more stable. Accordingly, when ΔE h = 0 the boundary of the phase diagram of wetting states is attained to separate the Wenzel state and the Cassie-Baxter state.
Analytical Model of Nanopillar-Patterned Surface
to better understand the effects of nanopillar-patterned surface factors on droplet wetting behaviors and obtain a certain phase diagram of wetting states of a water droplet on a nanopillar-patterned surface. A similar strategy as the previous section is applied to investigate the intrinsic mechanism of wetting states on a nanopillar-patterned surface in this part. By combining Eqs. (17) and (18), the free energy difference is given by ∆E p = E W-p − E CB-p. When ∆E p > 0, it represents CB state. When ∆E p < 0, it represents the W state. According to ∆E p = 0, the boundary of the phase diagram of wetting states is obtained to separate the Wenzel state and the Cassie-Baxter state as well.
Here, we consider that the droplets’ volumes have the same value and are constant. The contact angles θ W and θ CB are expressed by cosθ W = rcosθ 0 and cosθ CB = fcosθ 0 − (1 − f), respectively, where r and f are the respective Wenzel roughness factor and Cassie-Baxter roughness factor. It is notable that there might be energy barriers when the transition between the CB and W states happens and the lower energy state will occur as long as the energy barriers are overcome. However, the energy barriers are usually rather low; in some instances, the energy barriers can be overcome with the help of sufficient conditions such as vibration, enough pressure, and extra field. Accordingly, we consider that the lower energy state is more stable in our analytical models.
Wetting States on the Nanohole-Patterned Surface
In summation, the theoretical results are in good agreement with the experimental observations. Figure 4b displays a phase diagram of the W and CB states of a water droplet on a nanohole-patterned surface, which can clarify the interrelated effects of the radius and the height of the nanohole on wetting states. The phase diagram clearly shows the relationship between the geometrical morphology parameters of a nanopatterned surface and the wetting states. Therefore, Fig. 4b is an explicit wetting state phase diagram for the nanohole-patterned analytical model and is applicable for predicting the initial wetting state under the circumstance of a water droplet sitting on different sizes of nanohole-patterned surfaces.
Wetting States on Nanopillar-Patterned Surface
Finally, to further validate our analytical model, we compare our model predictions with several relevant experimental studies of the wetting properties of water droplets on pillar-patterned silicon surfaces. Martines et al.  experimentally investigated the hydrophobicity behavior of water droplets on nanoasperities with fixed center-to-center pitch d p = 300 nm and various pillar diameters and heights. They observed that the droplet is in the CB state when the pillar radii and height are 78 and 286 nm, respectively (the red dot in Fig. 5a), and the droplet is in the W state when the pillar radii and height are 73.5 and 239 nm, respectively (the black dot in Fig. 5a), which are located in the corresponding regions that were theoretically predicted. Next, we use the experimental data in micro-scale to confirm our model. Fürstner and co-workers  studied the wetting and self-cleaning properties of water droplets on three types of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces with different micro-structure geometries. The experimental results reported that the wetting model is the W state when the geometric parameters are r p = 0.5 μm, h p = 1.0 μm, and d p = 2.0 μm (the black dot in Fig. 5b) and the wetting model is the CB state when the geometric parameters are r p = 0.5 μm, h p = 2.0 μm, and d p = 2.0 μm (the red dot in Fig. 5b). They also found that as r p = 0.5 μm, d p = 5.0 μm, and h p = 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 μm (the black dots in Fig. 5c, respectively), the wetting models are the W state. In the end, we compare the theoretical results with the experimental results measured by Jopp et al.  for water droplets on micro-texture structured surfaces when the pillar height and spacing distance are 250 and 110 μm, respectively; the water droplets are in the W state when the pillar radius is 30, 40, 50, and 60 μm (the black dots in Fig. 5d, respectively). The theoretical results predicted by our model are in excellent agreement with those results observed by experiments. Moreover, the model results can qualitatively explain some experiment results. For instance, He et al. [14, 15] found that increasing the height and decreasing the space of micro-rods may result in the Cassie-Baxter wetting state, while decreasing the height and increasing the space may result in the Wenzel wetting state. The comparison between the related experiment data and the prediction of the theoretical model in this paper are well matched, and the theoretical results’ variation tendency agrees well with the experimental results, which validate our theoretical model.
The above discussions suggest that the droplet wetting behaviors on a nanopillar surface are determined by the surface geometric structure, including nanopillar radius, height, and spacing between the nanopillars. Figure 5a shows a phase diagram of the wetting states on the nanopillar-patterned surface, and it explicitly expresses the relationship between the geometry of the nanopillar-patterned surface and the corresponding wetting state. Therefore, with the help of the wetting state phase diagram, it would be very easy to obtain the initial equilibrium wetting state when a droplet is sitting on a nanopatterned surface by knowing the size of the surface nanostructure.
In conclusion, we applied the thermodynamic method to study the wetting states of a water droplet on the two typical nanopatterned surfaces. We calculated the free energy difference between the W and CB states. Analyzing the free energy difference, we found that the wetting states of water droplets on nanopatterned surfaces are sensitive to the geometrical morphology and the intrinsic mechanism of wetting states which depends on the periodic nanopatterned geometrical parameters is elucidated in detail. To systematically understand the dependence of wetting states on the geometrical parameters of nanopatterned surfaces, two phase diagrams of the W and CB states for water droplets on nanopatterned surfaces are given, which would be quite useful in predicting the initial wetting state. The theoretical results agree well with the reported experimental results; we hope that the results can provide some useful guidance to the design and fabrication of nanopatterned surfaces with certain wetting characteristics. In this work, we focused on the phase diagrams of water droplets on the nanohole and nanopillar-patterned surfaces with a periodic square lattice distribution. Nonetheless, the thermodynamic method is general, and it can be applied to other nanopatterned surfaces and obtain the corresponding phase diagrams as well.
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11104084 and 11574080) and Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control (Hunan Normal University).
All the authors participated in the discussion of the results and in the writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Lafuma A, Quere D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mate 2(7):457–460View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blossey R (2003) Self-cleaning surfaces virtual realities. Nat Mate 2(5):301–306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Shi F, Niu J, Jiang Y, Wang Z (2008) Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application. J Mater Chem 18(6):621–633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2009) Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: non-adhesion, energy, green engineering. Curr Opin in Colloid Interface Sci 14(4):270–280View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan YY, Gao N, Barthlott W (2011) Mimicking natural superhydrophobic surfaces and grasping the wetting process: a review on recent progress in preparing superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 169(2):80–105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Prog in Mater Sci 56(1):1–108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee JY, Han J, Lee J, Ji S, Yeo JS (2015) Hierarchical nanoflowers on nanograss structure for a non-wettable surface and a sers substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- JN C, Zhang Z, Ouyang XL, Jiang PX (2016) Dropwise evaporative cooling of heated surfaces with various wettability characteristics obtained by nanostructure modifications. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verplanck N, Coffinier Y, Thomy V, Boukherroub R (2007) Wettability switching techniques on superhydrophobic surfaces. Nanoscale Res Lett 2:577–596View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun CQ, Sun Y, Ni Y, Zhang X, Pan J, Wang X-H, Zhou J, Li L-T, Zheng W, Yu S, Pan LK, Sun Z (2009) Coulomb repulsion at the nanometer-sized contact: a force driving superhydrophobicity, superfluidity, superlubricity, and supersolidity. J Phys Chem C 113(46):20009–20019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28(8):988–994View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cassie BD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surface. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martines E, Seunarine K, Morgan H, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Riehle MO (2005) Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. Nano Lett 5(10):2097–2103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Y, Jiang C, Wang S, Yin H, Yuan W (2013) Control wetting state transition by micro-rod geometry. Appl Surf Sci 285:682–687View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Y, Jiang C, Wang S, Ma Z, Tian W, Yuan W (2014) Tailoring anisotropic wettability using micro-pillar geometry. Colloids Interface Sci Commun 2:19–23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ren W (2014) Wetting transition on patterned surfaces: transition states and energy barriers. Langmuir 30(10):2879–2885View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amabili M, Lisi E, Giacomello A, Casciola CM (2016) Wetting and cavitation pathways on nanodecorated surfaces. Soft Matter 12(12):3046–3055View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patankar NA (2004) Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 20(17):7097–7102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu T, Sun W, Sun X, Ai H (2010) Thermodynamic analysis of the effect of the hierarchical architecture of a superhydrophobic surface on a condensed drop state. Langmuir 26(18):14835–14841View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Extrand CW (2016) Remodeling of super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 32(34):8608–8612View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhushan B, Jung YC (2008) Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20(22):225010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Extrand CW (2004) Criteria for ultralyophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20(12):5013–5018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Chen D (2008) Criteria for entrapped gas under a drop on an ultrahydrophobic surface. Langmuir 24(18):10174–10180View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang CX, Yang GW (2005) Thermodynamics of metastable phase nucleation at the nanoscale. Mater Sci Eng R 49(6):157–202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu QX, Zhu YJ, Yang GW, Yang QB (2008) Nucleation thermodynamics inside micro/nanocavity. J Mater Sci Technol 24(2):183–186Google Scholar
- Wang N, Cai Y, Zhang RQ (2008) Growth of nanowires. Mater Sci Eng R 60(1–6):1–51Google Scholar
- Xiong SY, Qi WH, Huang BY, Wang MP, Cheng YJ, Li YJ (2011) Size and shape dependent surface free energy of metallic nanoparticles. J Comput Theor Nanosci 8(12):2477–2481View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dorrer C, Rühe J (2006) Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. Langmuir 22(18):7652–7657View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun CQ (2007) Size dependence of nanostructures: impact of bond order deficiency. Prog Solid State Chem 35(1):1–159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sui M, Pandey P, Li M-Y, Zhang Q, Kunwar S, Lee J (2017) Au-assisted fabrication of nano-holes on c-plane sapphire via thermal treatment guided by au nanoparticles as catalysts. Appl Surf Sci 393:23–29View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang G, Wang CX, Yang GW (2009) Surface energy of nanostructural materials with negative curvature and related size effects. Chem Rev 109(9):4221–4247View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Y, Chen WF, Yu WB, Ouyang G, Yang GW (2013) Anomalous interface adhesion of graphene membranes. Sci Rep 3:2660View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang Y, Zhang X, Ma Z, Zhou Y, Zheng W, Zhou J, Sun CQ (2015) Hydrogen-bond relaxation dynamics: resolving mysteries of water ice. Coord Chem Rev 285:109–165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Checco A, Ocko BM, Rahman A, Black CT, Tasinkevych M, Giacomello A, Dietrich S (2014) Collapse and reversibility of the superhydrophobic state on nanotextured surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 112(21):216101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Checco A, Hofmann T, DiMasi E, Black CT, Ocko BM (2010) Morphology of air nanobubbles trapped at hydrophobic nanopatterned surfaces. Nano Lett 10(4):1354–1358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bico J, Marzolin C, Quéré D (1999) Pearl drops. Europhys Lett 47(2):220–226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jopp J, Grüll H, Yerushalmi-Rozen R (2004) Wetting behavior of water droplets on hydrophobic microtextures of comparable size. Langmuir 20(23):10015–10019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fürstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Walzel P (2005) Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 21(3):956–961View ArticleGoogle Scholar