Open Access

The Effect of Sulphate Anions on the Ultrafine Titania Nucleation

  • Volodymyr O. Kotsyubynsky1Email author,
  • Ivan F. Myronyuk1,
  • Volodymyr L. Chelyadyn2,
  • Andriy B. Hrubiak3,
  • Volodymyr V. Moklyak3 and
  • Sofia V. Fedorchenko1
Nanoscale Research Letters201712:369

Received: 14 December 2016

Accepted: 15 May 2017

Published: 23 May 2017


The phenomenological model of sulphate anions effect on the nanodispersed titania synthesis during hydrolysis of titanium tetrachloride was studied. It was proposed that both chelating and bridging bidentate complexes formation between sulphate anions and octahedrally coordinated [Ti(OH)h(OH2)6−h](4−h)+ mononers is the determinative factor for anatase phase nucleation.


Hydrolysis Polycondensation Nucleation Anatase Sulphate anions


Ultrafine TiO2 has wide range of highly promising applications in many different fields—from the environmental oriented photocatalytic system, such as degradation of hazardous organic compounds [1], waste water cleaning [2], direct decomposition of NO x , SO x and air purification [3] to novel fields of industry—sensor materials [4] and solar cells [5]. Phase composition, particle size and surface state are the most important characteristics that determine catalytic reactivity, photosensitivity and adsorption properties of TiO2. For example, the decrease of particle size of titania leads to the rapid increase of catalytic activity [6]. At the same time, the photocatalytic properties of titania are very sensitive to phase composition of TiO2 polymorphs such as anatase, brookite and rutile [7].

Choice of titania synthesis method with the control of its physical and chemical parameters is crucially important determinants of resulted compositions. The preparation of nanosized TiO2 is possible by sol-gel [8], chemical precipitation [9], microemulsion [8] and hydrothermal [10] methods. The sol-gel method is the most flexible technique for nanosized oxide preparation. The variations of primary precursor types, hydrolysis conditions, temperature and pH of the reaction medium allow the control of nanoparticle nucleation and growth. The sol-gel method of titania obtained is typically based on the reactions of titanium alkoxides Ti(OR)n hydrolysis. The change of these expensive chemicals to the cheaper precursor such as TiCl4 is very promising for a large scale manufacture of nanosized TiO2. A promising advantage of TiCl4 application is the possibility of polycondensation reactions controlled by additive ions with the use of the predicted nucleation of the specified phase of titania.

The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of SO4 2− anions on the oligomer polycondensation and oxide network formation during titania nucleation for the sol-gel process based on TiCl4 hydrolysis.


Titanium tetrachloride TiCl4 (Merck, 99.9%; specific density 1.73 g/cm3 at 20 °C) was cooled to 0 °C and hydrochloric acid (36.0% aqueous solution) was added with further hydrogen chloride evaporation. The TiCl4 to hydrochloric acid ratio was 2:1. Aqueous solution of sodium hydrocarbonate was added dropwise to sol of titanium oxychloride TiOCl2 to get pH of 5.0–5.5 under vigorous stirring. Gel formation was observed during all pH increasing process. The suspension of nanoparticles was kept at 80 °C for 3 h with the further washed with distilled water to remove Na+ and Cl ions. Precipitated TiO2 was dried at the 150 °C, and obtained xerogel was marked as S1. The S2 material synthesis process was carried out likewise, but crystalline-dried Na2SO4 was added directly to titanium tetrachloride on the stage of TiCl4 hydrolysis.

Diffraction patterns were obtained with the diffractometer DRON-4-07 equipped with an X-ray tube BSV28 (Cu Kα radiation, 40 kV, 30 mA), a Bragg-Brentano geometry-type and a Ni Kβ-filter. A qualitative analysis was carried out with the use of ICSD structural models. The structural models for anatase and rutile were based on the ICSD #92363 and ICSD #24780, respectively. Copper powder annealed in vacuum (850–900 °C for 4 h) with an average grain size of about 50 μm was used as a reference sample to determinate instrumental peak broadening. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) for a diffraction peak of this reference sample at the 2θ = 43.38° was 0.129°; therefore, it made it possible to distinguish anatase and brookite phases. The size of the coherently scattering domains was calculated by the Scherrer equation: \( D=\frac{K\lambda}{\beta cos\theta} \), with K is the Scherrer constant (K = 0.9), λ is the wavelength (0.154 nm), β the FWHM (in radians), and θ is the peak angular position. We used the combination of Gauss and Cauchy (dominated) functions as a profile shape.

Infrared spectra were recorded with Thermo-Nicolet Nexus 670 FTIR spectrometer in the 4000–400 cm−1 region. The TiO2/KBr mixture after vibrating milling was pressed into pellets and measured in the transmission mode.

The morphology of sample powders was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with a 100-kV microscope JEOL JEM-100CX II. The microscopic copper grid covered by a thin transparent carbon film was used as a specimen support for TEM researches.

Results and Discussion

The presence of sodium sulphate in the reaction medium significantly affected the phase composition of the obtained materials (Fig. 1). The material synthesized in the absence of Na2SO4 additive (S1) was a mixture of anatase and rutile with the relative phase contents of 65 ± 4 and 35 ± 5 wt %, respectively. The average size of the coherently scattering domains (CSD) was about 14 nm for anatase and 9 nm for rutile, so both phases are good crystallized. Meanwhile, the part of the material is close to amorphous state as the presence of the halo on XRD pattern for 2θ = 16–32o is evident. According to synthesis conditions, the formation of non-titania phase is unlikely to occur. As a result, the material consists of separated regions with different crystallinity degrees. The specific surface area of S1 sample was about 152 m2 g−1. The material S2 was close to amorphous ultrafine titania with clear structural features of anatase. The halo on XRD pattern is also observed in this case but it is relatively narrowed and shifted to larger 2θ values. The average size of CSD was about 4–5 nm (the analysis is complicated by low crystallinity of the material). The specific surface area for S2 sample was increased to 328 m2 g−1.
Fig. 1

XRD patterns of S1 and S2 materials

TEM images of S1 sample (Fig. 2a) do not allow to make clear conclusions about its morphology but the observed agglomerates consisted of the lamellar-like primary particles with the sizes of 10–15 nm. Furthermore, there is no evidence of crystalline area boundaries (Fig. 2b). The S2 sample had bubble-like morphology of the agglomerates (Fig. 2c, d). HR TEM showed high crystallinity of some grains of this material (Fig. 3) with the interplanar distances of 0.34–0.37 nm. The obtained interplanar spacing corresponds to the (101) plane of anatase (0.352 nm). This indicates that the preferred growth direction of CSD (crystallites) is [010] crystallography axis. This result led to conclusions that the anatase nanocrystals with oxygenated surfaces have developed facets in the 〈010〉 direction [11].
Fig. 2

TEM images of the samples S1 (a, b) and S2 (c, d)

Fig. 3

HR TEM images of S2 material with the fringes from {101} planes

More information about synthesized materials was obtained by FTIR spectroscopy. The broad absorption area around 3400 cm−1 indicates the presence of chemisorbed OH-groups on the surface of titania particles (ν-OH modes) (Fig. 4) [12]. The shift of the ν-OH bands from typical 3700–3600 to about 3400 cm−1 can be caused by the presence of hydrogen bonding [13]. The band around 1600 cm−1 demonstrates the presence of molecularly adsorbed water (δ-H2O modes) [14]. The higher crystallinity degree for S1 sample causes the formation of relatively more distinct absorption bands in the titania characteristic area (400–700 cm−1) [15].
Fig. 4

FTIR spectra of S1 and S2 materials

The additional absorbance band on the FTIR patterns for S2 materials at 1139 and 1060 cm−1 corresponds to chemisorbed SO4 2− ions [16]. A sharp low intensity band 1384 cm−1 is typical for the metal oxides modified by sulphate ion bands and assigned to S=O stretching frequency. Meanwhile, S=O–H coordination is unlikely because the absorption band will shift in low-frequency area up to 1325 cm−1 in this case. There are two different variants of SO4 2− immobilization on the titania surface—a chelating bidentate complex formation with coordination to one metal ion through two oxygens or bridged bidentate complex formation using bonding through two metal ions; both complexes belong to C2v point group. Bridged bidentate SO4 2− anions coordinated to Ti4+ have characteristic stretching frequencies in the 930–1200 cm−1 range, and major absorption peak at 1148 cm−1 is attributed to asymmetric stretching vibrations [17]. The bands in the 1300–900 cm−1 region were observed for SO4 2−/TiO2 system, and the peaks at 1217, 1134, 1044, and 980 cm−1 were identified in [18] as characteristic frequencies of a bridge bidentate SO4 2− coordinated to metals. According to [19], bridged bidentate complex has four absorption bands at 1195–1160, 1110–1105, 1035–1030 and 990–960 cm−1, which are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching frequencies of the S=O and S–O bonds.

The conclusion about energetic favorability of chelating complex formation where SO4 2− anions are coordinated to Ti atoms through two oxygen was made on the base of sulphated titania investigation with the use of DFT calculation [20]. The formation of chelate sulphate complex corresponds to skeletal FTIR band at 1201 cm−1 [21] as chelating bidentate complex has four bands at 1240–1230, 1125–1090, 1035–995 and 960–940 cm−1 which are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching frequencies of S=O and S–O bands [19].

Deconvolution of the 1200–1000 cm−1 region of S2 material FTIR spectra revealed the presence of four bands at 1182, 1140, 1086 and 1060 cm−1. The absorption band at 1086 cm−1 is quite close to that of the chelating bidentate complex. Two bands of chelating and bridging bidentate complexes overlap each other so band at 1182 cm−1 can correspond to both types of complexes. The bands at 1060 and 1140 cm−1 imply that bridged bidentate complex is formed on the surface of the S2 sample.

We can suggest the following model of SO4 2− impact on titania nucleation at the stage of olation interaction between primary hydrocomplexes taking into account the results shown in [22]. The hydrolysis of TiCl4 leads to [Ti(OH2)6]4+ formation where Ti4+ ions are in the octahedral coordination with the next transformation to [Ti(OH)h(OH2)6−h](4−h)+ monomers as a result of deprotonation. The hydrolysis ratio h is a function of pH and is determined by partial charge theory [23]. In these monomers, OH groups have thermodynamic advantages of the location in the octahedron equatorial planes, and H2O molecules primarily occupy the “vertex” position [24]. The products of hydrolysis are [Ti(OH)(OH2)5]3+ and [Ti(OH)2(OH2)4]2+ monomers when pH of reaction medium is close to 1. At pH = 3, the [Ti(OH)2(OH2)4]2+ and [Ti(OH)3(OH2)3]+ complexes coexist in solution. At pH = 4, the hydrolysis leads to the formation of the [Ti(OH)3(OH2)3]+ complexes, and in the range of pH = 6–8, the [Ti(OH)4(OH2)2]0 monomers are formed. The possibility of the titania polymorph formation is defined by the spatial organization of [Ti(OH)h(OH2)6−h](4−h)+ primary monomers. [Ti(OH)4(OH2)2]0 monomers (in which OH groups occupy octahedron equatorial planes and H2O molecules are in the vertexes) form in neutral or alkaline mediums [20, 25]. Dimers are formed as a result of olation reaction between two primary monomers for which the octahedron coordination has a common edge outside the octahedron equatorial plane. After further polycondensation, the zigzag-like or spiral chain of [Tin(OH)4n(OH2)2]0 polyhedrons are formed and the conditions for the anatase phase nucleation are created. The [TimnOmn(OH)2mn(OH2)2m]0 polymer is formed resulting from m linear structures of [Tin(OH)4n(OH2)2]0 olation interaction. The nucleation of anatase phase is the result of octahedral merger by lateral planes of faces [26]. At the same time, the hydronium ions of the reaction medium interact with hydroxyl groups in the octahedron equatorial plane. If the hydronium ion concentration in the reaction medium increases, [Ti(OH)h(OH2)6−h](4−h)+ monomers will form under h < 2 condition. Olation interaction between them leads to the polymer chain formation where monomers are linked by joint edges in octahedron equatorial planes, thus defining the precondition for rutile phase nucleation [25].

The presence of SO4 2− ions in the reaction medium at pH about 5.5 will cause both Ti(SO4)(OH)2(H2O)2 chelating and Ti2(SO4)(OH)6(OH2)2 bridging bidentate complexes formation (Fig. 5). There are two different pathways of olation interaction between these complexes. Two monomers connect with each other or by sharing apical edges (chelating complexes influence) or in equatorial plane (bridging bidentate complexes influence) with the dehydrating of water molecule. At the next stage in both cases, the formation of skewed zigzag-like tetranuclear titanium complexes with the dehydrating of two water molecules takes place and the nucleation of anatase structure starts.
Fig. 5

Proposed mechanisms of anatase phase nucleation with the formation of chelating and bridging bidentate SO4 2− complexes


The effect of SO4 2− anions on the titania nucleation during hydrolysis of titanium tetrachloride was studied. We concluded that the nucleation process is mainly controlled by pH of the reaction medium and SO4 2− anion presence. Sulphate anions form both chelating Ti(SO4)(OH)2(H2O)2 and bridging bidentate Ti2(SO4)(OH)6(OH2)2 complexes at the stage of titanium tetrachloride hydrolysis. We suggested the model with two pathways of olation interaction between titano-sulphate complexes when SO4 2- ligands stimulate screw polymer chains formation and the nucleation of TiO2 anatase phase.



The study was supported by Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, research project No. 0116U007437.

Authors’ Contributions

VOK offered the general concept of the effect of SO4 2− sulphate anions on the ultrafine titania nucleation and also was involved in drafting the manuscript and interpretation of obtained results. IFM gave the idea of such nanocomposite to be created and also is a corresponding author. VLCh participated in the HR TEM and FTIR data analysis. ABH carried out the experimental procedures and interpretation of the data obtained and drafted the manuscript. VVM and SVF took part in the interpretation of the obtained data. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Information

VOK is a Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor at Department of Materials Science, Physical and Technical Faculty at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. IFM is a Doctor of Chemistry, Head of the Department of Organic and Analytical Chemistry, Natural Sciences Faculty at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. VLCh is a researcher of Institute of Materials Science I.M. Frantsevich, National Academy of Science of Ukraine. ABH and VVM are researchers of Institute of Metal Physics National Academy of Science of Ukraine. SVF is a researcher of Natural Sciences Faculty at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
Institute of Materials Science I.M. Frantsevich
Institute of Metal Physics, National Academy of Science


  1. Yamashita H, Harada M, Misaka J, Takeuchi M, Neppolian B, Anpo M (2003) Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds diluted in water using visible light-responsive metal ion-implanted TiO2 catalysts: Fe ion-implanted TiO2. Catal Today 84(3):191–196View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kazuhito H, Irie H, Fujishima A (2005) TiO2 photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects. Jpn J Appl Phys 44(12):8269–8285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrios AG, Pierre P (2005) State of the art and perspectives on materials and applications of photocatalysis over TiO2. J Appl Electrochem 35(7):655–663View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao SJ, Li CM, Zang JF, Cui XQ, Qiao Y, Guo J (2008) New nanostructured TiO2 for direct electrochemistry and glucose sensor applications. Adv Funct Mater 18(4):591–599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. O’regan B, Grfitzeli M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized. Nature 353(6346):737–740View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Xu N, Shi Z, Fan Y, Dong J, Shi J, Hu MZC (1999) Effects of particle size of TiO2 on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in aqueous suspensions. Ind Eng Chem Res 38(2):373–379View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Testino A, Bellobono IR, Buscaglia V, Canevali C, D'Arienzo M, Polizzi S, Morazzoni F (2007) Optimizing the photocatalytic properties of hydrothermal TiO2 by the control of phase composition and particle morphology. A systematic approach. J Am Chem Soc 129(12):3564–3575View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Macwan DP, Dave PN, Chaturvedi S (2011) A review on nano-TiO2 sol–gel type syntheses and its applications. J Mat Sci 46(11):3669–3686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta SM, Tripathi M (2012) A review on the synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by solution route. Cent Eur J Chem 10(2):279–294Google Scholar
  10. Yin H, Wada Y, Kitamura T, Kambe S, Murasawa S, Mori H, Yanagida S (2001) Hydrothermal synthesis of nanosized anatase and rutile TiO2 using amorphous phase TiO2. J Mater Chem 11(6):1694–1703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnard AS, Curtiss LA (2005) Prediction of TiO2 nanoparticle phase and shape transitions controlled by surface chemistry. Nano Lett 5(7):1261–1266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sivakumar S, Pillai PK, Mukundan P, Warrier KGK (2002) Sol–gel synthesis of nanosized anatase from titanyl sulfate. Mater Lett 57(2):330–335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutierrez-Alejandre A, Gonzalez-Cruz M, Trombetta M, Busca G, Ramirez J (1998) Characterization of alumina–titania mixed oxide supports: Part II: Al2O3-based supports. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 23(5):265–275View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Karuppuchamy S, Jeong JM (2006) Synthesis of nano-particles of TiO2 by simple aqueous route. J Oleo Sci 55(5):263–266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Djaoued Y, Robichaud J, Bruning R (2005) The effect of polyethylene glycol on the crystallization and phase transitions of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Mater Sci-Pol 23(1):15–27Google Scholar
  16. Yamaguchi T, Jin T, Ishida T, Tanabe K (1987) Structural identification of acid sites of sulfur-promoted solid super acid and construction of its structure on silica support. Mater Chem Phys 17(1-2):3–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Raj KJA, Viswanathan B (2009) Single-step synthesis and structural study of mesoporous sulfated titania nanopowder by a controlled hydrolysis process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1(11):2462–2469View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhu ML, Liu YQ, Yan RY, Wang H, Li ZX, Lu XM (2011) Glycolysis of polyethylene terephthalate catalyzed by solid superacid. Adv Mater Res 233:512–518View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li X, Huang W (2009) Synthesis of biodiesel from rap oil over sulfated titania-based solid superacid catalysts. Energy Sources 31(18):1666–1672View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Raj K, Shanmugam R, Mahalakshmi R, Viswanathan B (2010) XPS and IR spectral studies on the structure of phosphate and sulphate modified titania: a combined DFT and experimental study. Indian J Chem Sect A Inorg Phys Theor Anal 49(1):9–17Google Scholar
  21. Zhao H, Bennici S, Shen J, Auroux A (2010) Nature of surface sites of catalysts and reactivity in selective oxidation of methanol to dimethoxymethane. J Catal 272(1):176–189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotsyubynsky VO, Myronyuk IF, Myronyuk LI, Chelyadyn VL, Mizilevska MH, Hrubiak AB, Tadeush OK, Nizamutdinov FM (2016) The effect of pH on the nucleation of titania by hydrolysis of TiCl4. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 47(2-3):288–294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Henry M, Jolivet JP, Livage J. Aqueous chemistry of metal cations: hydrolysis, condensation and complexation. In: Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Applications of Sol-Gel Glasses. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1992. p. 153-206.Google Scholar
  24. Kumar SG, Rao KK (2014) Polymorphic phase transition among the titania crystal structures using a solution-based approach: from precursor chemistry to nucleation process. Nanoscale 6(20):11574–11632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zheng Y, Erwei S, Wenjun L, Zhizhan C, Weizhuo Z, Xingfang H (2002) The formation of titania polymorphs under hydrothermal condition. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci 45(2):120–129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen B, Beach JA, Maurya D, Moore RB, Priya S (2014) Fabrication of black hierarchical TiO2 nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 4(56):29443–29449View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017