Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Structure and Electronic Properties of Transition Metal Doped Kaolinite Nanoclay

Nanoscale Research Letters201712:411

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2188-4

  • Received: 15 May 2017
  • Accepted: 5 June 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

In this work, a series of transition metal (Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) doped kaolinite nanoclays were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The influence of metal doping on geometric structure and electronic structure of kaolinite was analyzed. The ferromagnetic (FM), antiferromagnetic (AFM), and nonmagnetic (NM) states of transition metal (TM) doped kaolinite structures were studied. The crystal volume, lattice parameters, bond length, charge, and spin were calculated by dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D2). The results indicated that Cr3+ and Fe3+ dopants showed more stable under AFM state, while Mn3+ preferred both AFM and FM states, and Co3+ dopant preferred NM state. Also, the transition metal doping could induce lattice volume expansion and some dopant states in the band gap.

Keywords

  • Kaolinite nanoclay
  • Transition metal
  • Doping
  • Electronic structure
  • Dispersion-corrected density functional theory

Background

Kaolin-group nanoclay minerals, as a result of hydrothermal alteration and/or weathering processes, have unique physical properties because of their layered structure, small grain size, and most importantly the hydrated surface with plenty of hydroxyl groups. It has attracted the attention of researchers in materials chemistry, environmental chemistry, and mineral physics [111]. Kaolinite, one of the most abundant nanoclay minerals on Earth, has been wildly used in plastics, catalysis, and the cement industry. Further functionalization of kaolinite as novel support materials has attracted more and more attentions in various fields. Kaolinite can simply serve as support materials to mix with other nanoparticles to form phase change materials for solar energy utility [4, 5] or coated with doped oxide to form conductive powders for applications in conductive fields [9, 12]. The hybridization of kaolinite with functional nanoparticles was found to enhance the photocatalytic activity of Pd–ZnO and the luminescence properties of CdS through a synergistic effect [6, 7]. The surface properties of kaolinite were modified by anchoring some functional groups at the surface [13, 14] or by acid activation pretreatment for further improvement [2].

The structures and energetics of kaolin-group minerals have been extensively investigated experimentally [1517] and theoretically [1822]. Theoretical study of heavy metal adsorption on the kaolinite surface were studied for Cd, Cu, Hg, and Ni(II) adsorption [23], in which adsorption ability of kaolinite clay for ions were found in the order of Ni > Cu > Cd > Hg(II). The adsorption and diffusion of Pb(II) [24, 25] and uranyl [26] on the kaolinite (001) surface were studied [2426], and the adsorption behavior in aqueous system was also reported later [27, 28]. The influence of Mg, Ca, and Fe doping on kaolinite surface, and the subsequent adsorption and penetration of H2O into the interlayer were studied [29]. The adsorption energies of H2O on doped kaolinites (001) were found less than undoped surface. The electronic structure of kaolinite with and without intrinsic defects has been studied by the standard density functional theory (DFT) functionals and hybrid functionals [30]. However, not until recently have the structure evolutions during the dehydroxylation, dealumination, and silica condensation process of kaolinite are modeled by DFT calculations [1, 31, 32]. The removal of Al in kaolin-group materials greatly altered the geometry and electronic properties of these layer materials and improved their support effect [1, 2].

Metal doping, as a well-known method to modify the structure and properties of compounds, has been theoretically studied for Al2O3 [33], TiO2 [34], MOF [35], and other solids [36]. To explore the changes in structure and properties of kaolinite nanoclay upon transition metal (TM) doping would be interesting for this layered clay material. In this work, a series of Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co doped kaolinite nanoclay were studied by DFT calculations and focused on the influence of metal doping on geometric structure and electronic structure of kaolinite nanoclay. The possible ferromagnetic (FM), antiferromagnetic (AFM), and nonmagnetic (NM) states of these transition metal doped kaolinite structures were studied. The lattice parameters, bond length, charge, and spin were optimized and calculated by dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D2).

Methods

All calculations were performed with the program CASTEP (Cambridge Sequential Total Energy Package) code [37], based on first-principle DFT. Generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the exchange-correlation potential by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) was used for the calculations [38]. Grimme’s DFT-D2 dispersion corrections were included to account for Van der Waals dispersion interactions [39]. An energy cutoff of 500 eV was applied using the ultrasoft pseudo-potential plane-wave formalism [40]. The Monkhorst–Pack [41] grid with 2 × 2 × 3 k-point mesh was used for geometrical relaxation and electronic structure calculations. The self-consistent total energy in the ground state was effectively obtained by the density-mixing scheme [42]. For the geometry optimizations, the convergence threshold for self-consistent field (SCF) tolerance was set to 1.0 × 10−6 eV/atom, all forces on the atoms were converged to less than 0.03 eV/Å, the total stress tensor was reduced to the order of 0.05 GPa, and the maximum ionic displacement was within 0.001 Å. The elements investigated in valence states were O(2s22p4), Al(3s23p1), Cr(3s23p63d54s1), Mn(3d54s2), Fe(3d64s2), and Co(3d74s2). Uspcc pseudo-potentials were used for Mn, Fe, and Co, and usp pseudo-potentials for the rest of the elements. The cell parameters and atomic coordination were fully relaxed during the geometry optimization using a Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) minimization algorithm. The crystal symmetry was removed by imposing different initial magnetic moments on TM ions so that the electronic ground state could adopt lower symmetry.

Results and Discussion

The initial kaolinite structure was taken for our previous work [1]. Figure 1 shows the relaxed 2 × 2 × 1 crystal structure of kaolinite (4 kaolinite units). The kaolinite layer structure, Al2Si2O5(OH)4, is composed by an octahedral Al–O sheet and a tetrahedral Si–O sheet, connected by apical O atom (Oa). The Si–O tetrahedron is constructed by one central Si atom and four surrounding O atom, in which one is the Oa atom and the other three are the basal O atoms (Ob). The Al–O octahedron is constructed by one central Al and six surrounding O, in which two are Oa atom and the other four are O atoms (in OH groups) shared with other Al–O octahedron. Besides, these OH groups can be divided into two kinds: the inter-layer OH (OHinter) at the surface of the layer structure and the inner OH (OHinner) inside the layer structure between the Al sheet and the Si sheet. Hence, there are two kinds of Si–O bonds, Si–Oa and Si–Ob (black dot line), and three kinds of Al–O bonds, Al–Ointer (red dot line), Al–Oinner (green dot line), and Al–O (black dot line) in kaolinite bulk structure.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Top (up) and side (down) views of kaolinite. The Si–Oa (black), Si–Ob (black), M–OHinter (red), M–OHinner (green), and M–O (blue) bonds are indicated by dot lines

The dispersion energy always plays a major role in the structure stabilization of clay mineral due to the interaction between the layers [21, 43]. Among the several hybrid functionals, PBE-D2 [21], B3LYP [22], B3LYP-D [18], and RPBE-D2 [18, 21], which was used to obtain the experimental lattice structure of kaolinite [44, 45], PBE-D2 functional was found both accurate and less time consuming. The overestimation of PBE functional for bond lengths are overcome by dispersion correction compared to experimental results, as briefly reported previously [1]. In order to distinguish the effect of TM doping on the structure of kaolinite, here, we first revisit the lattice structure and the optimized bond distances between central cations (Si and Al) and oxygen atoms, Oa, Ob, and OHinn.

As shown in Table 1, for kaolinite, the calculated unit cell volume optimized using dispersion-corrected PBE-D2 functional is close to the experimental value, which gives significantly lowered relative error (0.4%) compared to PBE functional (3.4%). For lattice vectors a and b, the relative error using PBE-D2 (0.4%) is much lower than PBE (1.1%). And, under dispersion corrections of PBE-D2, the layer distance (vector c) of kaolinite is decreased by 0.17 Å (2%). Notably, the lattice angles after dispersion correction are very close to experimental results, especially for α. As for bond length distributions in kaolinite, although PBE-D2 gives little improvement for Si–Oa, Al–OHinner, and Al–O bonds compared with experimental results, a huge improvement is made for Al–OHinter bond at Al–O surface (which is important for surface chemistry) and slight improvement for Si–Ob bond at Si–O surface. Notably, for Al–OHinter bond, the dispersion correction from PBE-D2 seems to accurately describe the bonding environment at outmost layer of the Al–O surface, which is strongly influenced by the dispersion force from the Si–O surface of another kaolinite layer that lies above. Another point to mention here is that there are actually two splitted Al–O bonds (Fig. 1, blue dot line) with significantly different bond lengths of about 1.95 and 2.00 Å [45], which shows the lattice distortion of the Al–O octahedron originated from the lattice mismatch between Si–O sheet and Al–O sheet. As a major error in the calculation of kaolinite structure compared to experimental results, these Al–O bonds are overestimated by both PBE and PBE-D2, with similar averaged bond length (Table 1). PBE-D2 gives two Al–O bonds of approximately 1.96 and 2.04 Å, with the second one overestimated by 0.04 Å (Fig. 2, blue dot line).
Table 1

Calculated and experimental unit cell parameters (Å) and averaged bond lengths (Å) of kaolinite and the most stable TM–kaolinite structure with AFM, FM, and NM states. The M–O bond represents the Al–O bond for kaolinite or the TM–O bond for TM–kaolinite. The average charge and spin of M atoms are also given

 

Kaolinite

Cr–kaolinite

Mn–kaolinite

Fe–kaolinite

Co–kaolinite

NM

AFM

FM

AFM

FM

AFM

FM

NM

PBE

PBE-D2

Exp [45]

PBE-D2

V (Å3)

340.99

328.47

329.91

338.22

339.59

349.70

354.59

347.71

348.32

323.96

a (Å)

5.209

5.177

5.154

5.224

5.238

5.242

5.319

5.291

5.282

5.126

b (Å)

9.042

8.981

8.942

9.068

9.092

9.234

9.249

9.183

9.173

8.894

c (Å)

7.483

7.308

7.401

7.374

7.368

7.41

7.44

7.407

7.437

7.314

α (deg)

91.78

91.69

91.69

90.89

90.89

88.28

91.17

91.6

91.46

90.44

β (deg)

104.30

104.69

104.61

104.45

104.55

102.64

104.31

104.87

104.76

103.73

γ (deg)

89.81

89.82

89.82

89.87

89.84

88.76

89.77

89.92

89.88

89.83

Si–Ob

1.634

1.630

1.620

1.637

1.639

1.650

1.655

1.651

1.648

1.627

Si–Oa

1.610

1.605

1.610

1.601

1.604

1.596

1.602

1.600

1.602

1.610

M–O

2.004

2.000

1.971

2.061

2.058

2.214

2.117

2.100

2.098

1.999

M–OHinner

1.937

1.941

1.921

2.020

2.014

2.050

2.038

2.042

2.048

1.956

M–OHinter

1.867

1.859

1.857

1.943

1.948

1.962

1.977

1.954

1.969

1.922

O–H

0.974

0.977

 

0.983

0.983

0.987

0.986

0.985

0.984

0.987

Charge

1.84

1.84

 

1.25

1.26

1.21

1.24

1.37

1.37

1.08

Spin

0.00

0.00

 

3.06

3.08

3.80

3.84

4.02

4.06

0.00

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The bond distribution of Cr–, Mn–, Fe–, and Co–kaolinite. Multi-magnetic states are given for each TM–kaolinite. The averaged different types of O–H (black), Si–Oa (black), Si–Ob (black), M–OHinter (red), M–OHinner (green), and M–O (blue) bonds in kaolinite are indicated by dot lines. The M–OHinter (red), M–OHinner (green), and M–O (blue) bonds in Cr–kaolinite (AFM), Mn–kaolinite (FM), Fe–kaolinite (AFM), and Co–kaolinite (NM) are indicated by solid lines

The transition metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) doped kaolinites were constructed by replacing Al atom with Cr, Mn, Fe, or Co atom. Only the equivalent substitution of Al3+ ion with TM3+ ion was considered since nonequivalent substitution of TM ions with chemical state other than +3 will cause additional vacancies or impurities for charge balance. From structure point of view, PBE and PBE-D2 functionals of TM–kaolinite give similar structure difference as observed for kaolinite. Considering that PBE-D2 functional describes better for lattice vectors and bond lengths of the two basal surfaces of kaolinite, following discussion on TM–kaolinite, mainly depended on the results obtained by PBE-D2 functional. The lattice parameters, bond length, charge, and spin of TM doped kaolinite and their magnetic states were summarized in Table 1. The energy differences (per TM atom) between AFM and FM states for Cr–kaolinite, Mn–kaolinite, and Fe–kaolinite are 0.022, −0.006, and 0.094 eV, respectively. Since Co–kaolinite structure is only stable at a nonmagnetic state, only NM structure of Co–kaolinite is shown.

The unit cell volumes of TM–kaolinite are expanded compared to kaolinite, with a trend of Mn–kaolinite > Fe–kaolinite >> Cr–kaolinite >> kaolinite > Co–kaolinite. The cell expansions are mainly caused by the longer M–O bonds compared to Al–O bonds, leading to the major expansion in lattice vectors a and b. Meanwhile, the Si–Ob bonds at the Si–O sheet are elongated simultaneously, and the crystal lattice angles of α and β are distorted accordingly. The cell volume of Mn–kaolinite with FM state is increased by 1.4% compared to AFM state, while in contrast little influence of magnetic ordering on cell volumes is found for Cr–kaolinite and Fe–kaolinite. The magnetic moments of Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co are close to that in TM doped Al2O3 [33], while the Mulliken charge are slightly higher which implies stronger reactivity.

The bond length distributions of TM–kaolinite are analyzed in Fig. 2, with different types of Si–O and M–O bonds in TM–kaolinite indicated by solid lines for each doping element. Overall speaking, there is an increase of the bond lengths of M–O and Si–Ob after TM doping, and meanwhile there is a reorganization of the bond distribution of the splitted M–O bonds for M–OHinter (red), M–OHinner (green), and M–O (blue) bonds. Notably, the splitted Al–O bonds (blue dot line) disappeared after Cr and Co doping. Furthermore, the bond length distributions are highly dependent on the magnetic ordering for Mn atoms but are only slightly influenced for Cr and Fe atoms.

The PDOS results for Cr3+(d3), Mn3+(d4), Fe3+(d5), and Co3+(d6) and the corresponding charge density distributions are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. According to the Jahn–Teller theorem, any degenerate electronic system will spontaneously distort in such a way as to remove the degeneracy [46], which is affected by the surrounding bonding environment [47]. For TM3+ doping in octahedral Al site of kaolinite with plenty of hydroxyl groups, the five d-shell orbitals of TM3+ will split into a triplet t2g state and a doublet eg state under Oh symmetry. The electrons in the triplet state are localized in the middle region between the ligands and further hybridized with the nearest O states. Those in the doublet state point directly at the ligands and thus lie higher in energy than the t2g electrons. Generally, the presence of electrons in the eg orbitals tends to destabilize the octahedral bonding, and the degeneracy is removed by lengthening the bonds opposite the filled orbital and shortening the bonds opposite the empty orbital. The d–d transition of TM3+(Oh) species is always from the occupied t2g orbitals (dxy, dyz, and dzx) to unoccupied eg orbital (dx2-y2 or dz2, depending on their occupancy). The orbital splitting between eg orbitals and t2g orbitals of Cr3+(d3), Mn3+(d4), Fe3+ (d5), and Co3+ (d6) in TM–kaolinite is similar with that in Al2O3 and TiO2 [33, 48, 49], but the splitting energies between 3d orbitals are slightly larger than in their own oxides (Fig. 3), possibly due to the hybridization with the surrounding hydroxyl groups.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Total density of states (DOS) and atom-projected density of states (PDOS) of the most stable states for TM doped kaolinite are given. The highest occupied 3d orbitals (yellow) and the first (brown) and second (purple) lowest unoccupied 3d orbitals around Fermi level are pointed by colored arrows

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Partial charge density of TM 3d orbitals in TM–kaolinite, corresponding to the states pointed by arrows in PDOS results. The isosurface levels are 0.02 e/Å3

The difference of splitting energies between FM and AFM states of Mn–kaolinite is small, and the distributions of density of states are similar except the spin directions are different. Hence, for simplicity, only the results for AFM state are shown. For the high-spin Mn3+(d4) ion in Mn–kaolinite with AFM state, only one of the two eg orbitals is occupied at the valence band maximum (VBM) (Fig. 3, yellow arrow). The occupation of dz2 orbital which is lower in energy gives a strong repulsion on the bonding electrons of the two ligands along the z axis and elongates the M–O bonding in that direction. This effect is the well-known Jahn–Teller effect. The states at the bottom of the conduction band minimum (CBM) are composed by the lowest unoccupied dz2 orbital (brown arrow) and the higher dx2y2 orbital (purple arrow) of Mn3+(d4). For Cr3+(d3), Fe3+ (d5), and Co3+ (d6) doped case, where the t2g and eg orbitals are occupied evenly, the influence of Jahn–Teller distortion effect is small, which only caused slight deviation of the M–O bonds in TM–kaolinite (Fig. 2). Such modification of structure and electronic properties by TM doping might improve the application of kaolin in the field of catalysis [50, 51], CO capture [52, 53], drug loading [54], and energy storage [5557]. And, it can also be applied to other minerals, such as montmorillonite [50, 58], perlite [55], and talc [59] to alter their electronic properties.

Conclusions

The influence of transition metal (Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) doping on geometric structure and electronic structure of kaolinite nanoclay are investigated by DFT calculations. The crystal volume, lattice parameters, bond length, charge and spin, and possible magnetic states are calculated and studied. The Cr3+ and Fe3+ dopants show more stable under AFM state, Mn3+ prefer FM state, and Co3+ dopants prefer NM state. The transition metal doping induces lattice volume expansion and some reorganization of the M–O bond distributions. Meanwhile, the TM dopants introduce some 3d states with larger splitting energies in the band gap of kaolinite.

Abbreviations

AFM: 

Antiferromagnetic

BFGS: 

Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno

CASTEP: 

Cambridge Sequential Total Energy Package

CBM: 

Conduction band minimum

DFT: 

Density functional theory

DFT-D2: 

Dispersion-corrected density functional theory

FM: 

Ferromagnetic

GGA: 

Generalized gradient approximation

NM: 

Nonmagnetic

PBE: 

Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof

SCF: 

Self-consistent field

TM: 

Transition metal

VBM: 

Valence band maximum

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Fund for distinguished Young Scholars (51225403), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Central South University (ZLXD2017005), the National “Ten Thousand Talents Program” in China, the Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Project (2016RS2004, 2015TP1006), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Central South University (201507). Computing resources were provided by High Performance Computing Centre of Central South University and the National Supercomputing Centre of China in Shenzhen.

Authors’ Contributions

HY conceived the project and wrote the final paper. LF carried out the calculations and wrote the initial drafts of the work. LF and HY analyzed the data, discussed the results, and commented on the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Mineral Materials, School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China
(2)
Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
(3)
Hunan Key Lab of Mineral Materials and Application, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

References

  1. Fu L, Yang H, Tang A, Hu Y (2017) Engineering a tubular mesoporous silica nanocontainer with well-preserved clay shell from natural halloysite. Nano Res DOI:10.1007/s12274-017-1482-x.
  2. Liu S, Yan Z, Fu L, Yang H (2017) Hierarchical nano-activated silica nanosheets for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 167:140–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ouyang J, Guo B, Fu L et al (2016) Radical guided selective loading of silver nanoparticles at interior lumen and out surface of halloysite nanotubes. Mater Des 110:169–178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Li C, Fu L, Ouyang J et al (2015) Kaolinite stabilized paraffin composite phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Appl Clay Sci 115:212–220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Long M, Zhang Y, Shu Z, Tang A, Ouyang J, Yang H (2017) Fe2O3 nanoparticles anchored on 2D kaolinite with enhanced antibacterial activity. Chem Commun 53:6255–6258Google Scholar
  6. Li X, Fu L, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) Microwave-assisted synthesis and interfacial features of CdS/kaolinite nanocomposite. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 443:72–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li X, Yang H (2014) Pd hybridizing ZnO/kaolinite nanocomposites: synthesis, microstructure, and enhanced photocatalytic property. Appl Clay Sci 100:43–49View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu P, Yang H (2013) Insight into the physicochemical aspects of kaolins with different morphologies. Appl Clay Sci 74:58–65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu P, Yang H (2013) Polypropylene filled with kaolinite-based conductive powders. Appl Clay Sci 83–84:122–128View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Welch MD, Montgomery W, Balan E, Lerch P (2011) Insights into the high-pressure behavior of kaolinite from infrared spectroscopy and quantum-mechanical calculations. Phys Chem Miner 39:143–151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaef HT, Glezakou V-A, Owen AT et al (2014) Surface condensation of CO2 onto kaolinite. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:142–145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu P, Yang H, Ouyang J (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Sb–SnO2/kaolinites nanoparticles. Appl Clay Sci 55:151–157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang Y, Xie Y, Tang A et al (2014) Precious-metal nanoparticles anchored onto functionalized halloysite nanotubes. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:5507–5514View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin J, Fu L, Yang H, Ouyang J (2015) Carbon hybridized halloysite nanotubes for high-performance hydrogen storage capacities. Sci Rep 5:12429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston CT (2010) Probing the nanoscale architecture of clay minerals. Clay Miner 45:245–279View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Balan E, Calas G, Bish DL (2014) Kaolin-group minerals: from hydrogen-bonded layers to environmental recorders. Elements 10:183–188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. De Ligny D, Navrotsky A (1999) Energetics of kaolin polymorphs. Am Mineral 84:506–516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ugliengo P, Zicovich-Wilson CM, Tosoni S, Civalleri B (2009) Role of dispersive interactions in layered materials: a periodic B3LYP and B3LYP-D* study of Mg(OH)2, Ca(OH)2 and kaolinite. J Mater Chem 19:2564–2572View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. White CE, Provis JL, Riley DP et al (2009) What is the structure of kaolinite? Reconciling theory and experiment. J Phys Chem B 113:6756–6765View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. White CE, Kearley GJ, Provis JL, Riley DP (2013) Structure of kaolinite and influence of stacking faults: reconciling theory and experiment using inelastic neutron scattering analysis. J Chem Phys 138:194501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tunega D, Bucko T, Zaoui A et al (2012) Assessment of ten DFT methods in predicting structures of sheet silicates: importance of dispersion corrections. J Chem Phys 137:114105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tosoni S, Doll K, Ugliengo P (2006) Hydrogen bond in layered materials: structural and vibrational properties of kaolinite by a periodic B3LYP approach. Chem Mater 18:2135–2143View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhao J, He MC (2014) Theoretical study of heavy metal Cd, Cu, Hg, and Ni(II) adsorption on the kaolinite (0 0 1) surface. Appl Surf Sci 317:718–723View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. He M-C, Zhao J, Wang S-X (2013) Adsorption and diffusion of Pb(II) on the kaolinite (001) surface: a density-functional theory study. Appl Clay Sci 85:74–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Huang Y, Pan Z et al (2015) Theoretical investigation of lead vapor adsorption on kaolinite surfaces with DFT calculations. J Hazard Mater 295:43–54View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kremleva A, Krüger S, Rösch N (2008) Density functional model studies of uranyl adsorption on (001) surfaces of kaolinite. Langmuir 24:9515–9524View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Martorell B, Kremleva A, Krüger S, Rösch N (2010) Density functional model study of uranyl adsorption on the solvated (001) surface of kaolinite. J Phys Chem C 114:13287–13294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Xia S, Yu L (2015) Adsorption of Pb(II) on the kaolinite(001) surface in aqueous system: a DFT approach. Appl Surf Sci 339:28–35View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. He M-C, Zhao J (2012) Effects of Mg, Ca, and Fe(II) doping on the kaolinite (001) surface with H2O adsorption. Clays Clay Miner 60:330–337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Nisar J, Århammar C, Jämstorp E, Ahuja R (2011) Optical gap and native point defects in kaolinite studied by the GGA-PBE, HSE functional, and GW approaches. Phys Rev B 84:075120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sperinck S, Raiteri P, Marks N, Wright K (2011) Dehydroxylation of kaolinite to metakaolin—a molecular dynamics study. J Mater Chem 21:2118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. White CE, Provis JL, Proffen T et al (2010) Density functional modeling of the local structure of kaolinite subjected to thermal dehydroxylation. J Phys Chem A 114:4988–4996View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fu L, Yang H, Hu Y et al (2017) Tailoring mesoporous γ-Al2O3 properties by transition metal doping: a combined experimental and computational Study. Chem Mater 29:1338–1349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen X, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev 107:2891–2959View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Koh HS, Rana MK, Hwang J, Siegel DJ (2013) Thermodynamic screening of metal-substituted MOFs for carbon capture. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:4573–4581View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. McFarland EW, Metiu H (2013) Catalysis by doped oxides. Chem Rev 113:4391–4427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Segall MD, Lindan PJD, Probert MJ et al (2002) First-principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J Phys Condens Matter 14:2717–2744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787–1799View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanderbilt D (1990) Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys Rev B 41:7892–7895View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–5192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 54:11169–11186View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng K, Fu L, Ouyang J, Yang H (2016) Emerging parallel dual 2D composites: natural clay mineral hybridizing MoS2 and interfacial structure. Adv Funct Mater 26:2666–2675View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Bish DL (1993) Rietveld refinement of the kaolinite structure at 1.5 K. Clays Clay Miner 41:738–744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Neder RB, Burghammer IM, Grasl TH et al (1999) Refinement of the kaolinite structure from single-crystal synchrotron data. Clays Clay Miner 47:487–494View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ulrich M, M U (1993) Inorganic structural chemistry. John Wiley \& Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  47. Dunitz JD, Orgel LE (1957) Electronic properties of transition-metal oxides-II: cation distribution amongst octahedral and tetrahedral sites. J Phys Chem Solids 3:318–323View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Janisch R, Gopal P, Spaldin NA (2005) Transition metal-doped TiO2 and ZnO—present status of the field. J Phys Condens Matter 17:R657–R689View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng H, Li J, Li S-S, Xia J-B (2008) First-principles study of the electronic structures and magnetic properties of 3d transition metal-doped anatase TiO2. J Phys Condens Matter 20:125207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng K, Fu L, Yang H et al (2017) Hierarchical MoS2 intercalated clay hybrid nanosheets with enhanced catalytic activity. Nano Res 10:570–583View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Li X, Ouyang J, Zhou Y, Yang H (2015) Assembling strategy to synthesize palladium modified kaolin nanocomposites with different morphologies. Sci Rep 5:13763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Niu M, Yang H, Zhang X et al (2016) Amine-impregnated mesoporous silica nanotube as an emerging nanocomposite for CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:17312–17320View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Niu M, Li X, Ouyang J, Yang H (2016) Lithium orthosilicate with halloysite as silicon source for high temperature CO2 capture. RSC Adv 6:44106–44112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Li X, Qian Y, Ouyang J et al (2016) Chitosan modified halloysite nanotubes as emerging porous microspheres for drug carrier. Appl Clay Sci 126:306–312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Peng K, Zhang J, Yang H, Ouyang J (2015) Acid-hybridized expanded perlite as a composite phase-change material in wallboards. RSC Adv 5:66134–66140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu S, Yang H (2015) Composite of coal-series kaolinite and capric–lauric acid as form-stable phase-change material. Energy Technol 3:77–83View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu S, Yang H (2016) Porous ceramic stabilized phase change materials for thermal energy storage. RSC Adv 6:48033–48042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Peng K, Fu L, Li X et al (2017) Stearic acid modified montmorillonite as emerging microcapsules for thermal energy storage. Appl Clay Sci 138:100–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ding W, Ouyang J, Yang H (2016) Synthesis and characterization of nesquehonite (MgCO3·3H2O) powders from natural talc. Powder Technol 292:169–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement