Table 6 Performance comparison with different electrocatalysts base on Pd in GOR in alkaline media with the scan rate of 50 mVs−1
Catalyst | Fuel | Metal catalyst loading (wt%) | Concentration NaOH (M) | Temp (°C) | Current density (mAcm−2) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pt/CCE Pd/CCE Au/CCE | Glycerol (0.5 M) | 20 wt% | 0.01–4.0 M | 25–80 | 46.8 mAcm−2 51.8 mAcm−2 58.0 mAcm-2 | [9] |
PdmAu/C, Au/C and Pd/C | Ethanol (0.5 M) | 20 wt% | 2.0 M | 25 | 10.6 mA μg−1 | [14] |
Pd–Au | Methanol (1.0 M) | 60 wt% | 0.5 M | 25 | 1.30 mA cm−2 | [27] |
Pd/C, PdAu/C 50:50, PdSn/C 50:50, PdAuSn/C 50:40:10 and PdAuSn/C 50:10:40 | Glycerol (1.0 M) | – | 1.0 M | 25 | 70 mAcm−2 | [10] |
PdAg (1:1) /C PdAg (3:1) / C PdAu (1:1)/C PdAu (3:1)/C | Glycerol (0.5 M) | – | 1.0 M | 25 | 13.83 mA/cm2 | [28] |
Pd-Au NRs | Ethanol (1.0 M) | – | 0.1 M | 25 | 26.58 mAcm−2 | [29] |
PdAu /VGCNF | Glycerol (0.5 M) | 20 wt% | 1.0 M | 25 | 86.26 mAcm−2 | Before Optimization |
PdAu /VGCNF | Glycerol (0.5 M) | 12 wt% | 5.24 M | 60 | 158.34 mAcm−2 | After Optimization |