Skip to main content

Embedded Si/Graphene Composite Fabricated by Magnesium-Thermal Reduction as Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries


Embedded Si/graphene composite was fabricated by a novel method, which was in situ generated SiO2 particles on graphene sheets followed by magnesium-thermal reduction. The tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and flake graphite was used as original materials. On the one hand, the unique structure of as-obtained composite accommodated the large volume change to some extent. Simultaneously, it enhanced electronic conductivity during Li-ion insertion/extraction. The MR-Si/G composite is used as the anode material for lithium ion batteries, which shows high reversible capacity and ascendant cycling stability reach to 950 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 50 mA·g−1 after 60 cycles. These may be conducive to the further advancement of Si-based composite anode design.


Anode material plays a significant role in the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Recently, most people think that the promising candidate for anode material are the silicon-based materials [1,2,3]. The main reason is that it has high theoretical capacity of 4200 mAh g−1 (about 10 times for the commercial graphite anode, 372 mAh g−1). In addition, there is abundant silicon in nature, and lithium insertion potential is relatively low (< 0.5 V vs. Li/Li+) [4,5,6].Unfortunately, there are limits to the commercialization of silicon-based anode materials. The reason why is that volumetric expansion of the Si electrode by over 400% can cause a series of problems such as electrode pulverization, poor cycling stability, and seriously irreversible capacity recession [7, 8]. Therefore, to solve the issue of volume expansion, lots of means have been proposed that include obtaining the nano-scale silicon particles, and preparing the silicon-based composites [9, 10]. For composites, the most efficient methods is dispersing the nano-scale silicon into the carbon matrix, where the carbon matrix functioned as buffer system and electroactive material [11]. Xuejiao Feng et al. prepared nano/μ-structured Si/CNT particles via a combination of spray drying and magnesium-thermal reduction with use nano-particles SiO2 as both a template and silicon precursor [12]. It exhibited a capacity larger than 2100 mAh g−1 at current density 1 A g−1, and the capacity retention after 100 cycles was 95.5%.

Recently, graphene, an original kind of carbon material, has aroused great concerns in the field of materials science. It has a unique structure with a single-layer sheet-like structure composed of carbon atoms [13]. Demonstrably, it is very promising to prepare some graphene-based materials with remarkable property due to the superior electrical conductivity and high surface [14]. Huachao Tao et al. designed a self-supporting Si/ RGO nano-composite films. The result indicated that the composite had admirable electrochemical performance [15].

In our work, we designed a novel method to synthesize high-capacity magnesium-thermal reduced Si/graphene (MR-Si/G) composite, which used the tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and graphene oxide (GO) as the starting materials, and was in situ generated SiO2 particles on graphene sheets followed by magnesium thermal reduction. Compared with the previous preparation method, the synthesis of materials in this experiment is relatively simple. At the same time, silicon and graphene are relatively evenly mixed by in-situ generated SiO2 particles on graphene. Embedded structure of the composite accommodated the large volume change, displayed high specific capacity and cycle stability, and increased the electronic conductivity. Another, the raw materials are cheap. All of these may be conducive to the further advancement of Si-based composite anode design.


Graphite oxide (GO) was obtained from flake graphite according to the modified Hummers method in literature [16]. Dispersing graphite oxide in deionized water to obtain 1 mg/ml aqueous solution. Then, take 30 ml anhydrous ethanol and 0.17 g cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) blended by sonication for 10 min, then add 30 ml above graphite oxide aqueous solution and vigorous stirring to obtained mixture, followed by adding a specific amount tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and magnetic stirring 10 min, finally the ammonium hydroxide was used to adjust PH to 10, then continually stirring 2 h. Lastly, the mixture was sealed with the Teflon-lined autoclaves at 180 °C for 10 h. The resulting compound was suction filtration and dried in vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h.

This step is to prepare the Si/G complex by magnesium thermal reduction. Firstly, the above composite was heated at 550 °C for 3 h at 5 °C/min in an argon atmosphere, and then cool it to room temperature. The weight ratio of as-sample and magnesium powder was 1:1 in an agate mortar and grinding 30 min. Then, the mixture was placed in a tube furnace and heated at 800 °C for 4 h in an argon atmosphere. Finally, the as-composite was soaked by 1 M HCl for 10 h then filtered and dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 8 h. This product is MR-Si/G composite.

The X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max 2500PC) was used to characterize the phase composition of the materials. The morphology and structure of the products were evaluated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, SUPRA55), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100). Raman spectra and the FTIR Spectra were measured on RM2000 Raman Spectrometer (Renishaw, British) and the NICOLET 560 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer, respectively. The content of Si in the composite was measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, NETZSCH TG 209F1 Libra), it was from room temperature to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under air.

To test the electrochemical performance, which was carried out in two-electrode 2032 coin-type cells, the active material (MR-Si/graphene), conductive additive (Super-P), and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as binder were intermingled at weight ratio of 80:10:10, which was used as the working electrode. The mixture slurry was prepared by using deionized water as a solvent, then equably pasted on pure copper foil current collector via doctor blade processing, followed by drying under vacuum at 105 °C for 12 h. All the cells were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox (ZKX2, Nanjing University Instrument Factory). The metallic lithium foil was used as the counter electrode. The electrolyte was a solution of 1.0 M LiPF6, which dispersed in mixture of EC: DMC: EMC (1:1:1 by volume). The cells were tested in the potential range from 0.01 V to 3 V (vs. Li+/Li) by CT2001A Land battery testing system.

Results and Discussion

The MR-Si/graphene composite manufactured by in-situ generated SiO2 particles on graphene sheets followed by magnesium thermal reduction. Figure 1 illustrates the schematic diagram of the manufacture MR-Si/G complex. The SiO2 nano-particles were synthesized by modified Stöber process [17]. Subsequently, hydrothermal method was used to in-situ generate the SiO2/graphite oxide, the final composite was synthesized by magnesium-thermal reduction.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of the preparation procedures for MR-Si/G

Figure 2 reveals the XRD pattern of Si, MR-Si/G and GO corresponding to (a), (b), and (d), respectively. Figure 2c is a composite material that has not been acid-treated. The reflection peak at 2ϴ = 10.9° is graphite oxide. The main diffraction peaks at 2ϴ =28.5°, 47.6° and 56.5° corresponding to the planes of (111), (220), and (311) typical of Si, which are distinctly observed in MR-Si/G compound and pure silicon. Compared the pure Si to the MR-Si/G composite in the XRD pattern, which indicated that add the graphite oxide without changing the structure of the compounds. However, the peak of graphite oxide in composite disappears, the reason why it may be restored into the graphene. In addition, the magnesium-thermal reduction is a key factor to successfully synthesize the novel compounds. Simultaneously, if Mg is excessive, there will be some side reaction. The reactions are as follows:

$$ 2\mathrm{Mg}+\mathrm{Si}\mathrm{O}2\to 2\mathrm{Mg}\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{Si} $$
$$ 4\mathrm{Mg}+\mathrm{SiO}2\to 2\mathrm{MgO}+\mathrm{Mg}2\mathrm{Si} $$
Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD profiles of graphite oxide, pure silicon, MR-Si/G composite

Compared Fig. 2b–c, magnesium and other by-products are removed by acid treatment.

From the Raman diagram in Fig. 3, MR-Si/G composite, the peaks at approximately 516 cm−1(this peak is absent in the SiO2/GO) is in accordance with the spectrum of Si nano-particle [18], manifesting that the silicon appeared after the magnesium thermal reduction. This result is consistent with the XRD. All the three curves, which the peaks at 1330 cm−1 and 1585 cm−1 consistent with the D band and the G band, respectively. The G-peak is the feature of the graphite, representing the carbon of the sp2 structure. The D-peak can be ascribed to the existence of a defective hexagonal graphite structure. The ID/IG is the most important parameter, which was related to the graphitization degree of the carbonaceous material and the defect density in the graphene-based material [19]. Although it has been reported that the degree of ordering of graphene after thermal reduction is increased, the ID/IG intensity ratios of MR-Si/G composite has increased, which maybe the presence of Si nanoparticles that increases the disorder of the material [20]. After calculation, the ID/IG ratio of GO is approximately 0.93 and the ID / IG ratio of MR-Si / G is about 1.19. In order to further study the changes in chemical structure, we conducted FTIR to analyze the functional groups of sample. Figure 4 shows the FITR spectra of GO, pure Si, and MR-Si/G composite. For the Si and MR-Si/G composite, the peaks at about 468 cm−1, 816 cm−1, and 1087 cm−1 are corresponding to the O-Si-O bending vibration, symmetric elastic vibration of Si-O-Si and Si-O-Si asymmetric elastic vibration, respectively. The presence of these functional groups is conducive to the formation of a stable structure. And the broad peaks at 3427 cm−1 are related to the O-H stretching vibration.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Raman spectra for graphite oxide, SiO2/GO and MR-Si/G composite

Fig. 4
figure 4

FITR spectra of the GO, pure Si, and MR-Si/G composite

The morphology of all prepared materials was studied by SEM and TEM (Fig. 5). Figure 5a, c, e show the SEM images of the graphene, pure Silicon, and MR-Si/G composite, respectively. And the corresponding TEM images is Fig. 5b, d, f, respectively. We could see the morphology of graphene has many pleats and wrinkles, and the surface is relatively flat and smooth (Fig. 5a). TEM results are also matched (Fig. 5b). The nano-scale silicon particles are clearly seen to be spherical and dispersed evenly, but there is a ball-crushing phenomenon (Fig. 5c). The Si nano-particle size is about 500 nm in diameter. In the FE-SEM (Fig. 5e) and TEM images (Fig. 5f) of MR-Si/G composite, Si nano-particles distributed uniformly on the graphene and they are well embedded into graphene sheets. Comparing Fig. 5d with f, we can see that graphene layers exist at the edges of the composites.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a, c, e shows the SEM images of the graphene, pure Silicon, and MR-Si/G composite, respectively. b, d, f is the corresponding TEM images, respectively

The content of the Si in the MR-Si/G composite carried by the TGA measurements, which was implemented from ambient temperature to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in the air. As shown in Fig. 6, the start reaction temperature of the composite material is about 450 °C, and the oxidation reaction of the graphene oxide is completed at 600 °C. The weight loss of the composite represents the content of graphene, that is to say, the content of silicon in the complex also can be determined. From the picture, the weight percentages of Si is calculated to be about 70%. And in the complex, the curve increased above 600 °C, mainly due to the reaction of silicon with oxygen in the air to produce silica.

Fig. 6
figure 6

TGA curves of MR-Si/G composite and pure Si

Figure 7a, b depicts the first three times discharge-charge profiles of the pure Si and the MR-Si/G composite electrode, respectively. The current density is 50 mA·g−1 and voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V vs Li/Li+. For the pure Si, the initial discharge capacity is 3279 mAh·g−1, while the first charge capacity is only 2391 mAh·g−1(Fig. 7a).

Fig. 7
figure 7

(a) The third charge and discharge curves of pure Si (b) The third charge and discharge curves of MR-Si/G composite (c) Cycling performance of MR-Si/G composite compared with pure Si (d) Cycling performance of MR-Si/G composite at various rates

For the MR-Si/G composite, the initial discharge capacity and charge capacity is 1570 and 1178 mAh·g−1, respectively (Fig. 7)b, and revealing coulombic efficiency of 75.5%. The large irreversible capacity may be put down to a solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed on the electrode surface. The initial discharge curve demonstrates a long discharge flat curve with a plateau below 0.15 V. It can be attributed to the delithiation process from amorphous LixSi phase [21]. As the number of cycles increase, the capacity continued to decline, but the decay rate is slower relative to pure silicon.

Figure 7c shows the cycle performance and the coulombic efficiency of the MR-Si/G composite compared to the pure Si at a current density of 50 mA·g−1 after 60 cycles. For the pure Si, the cycle performance is highly bad at the first 10 cycles, which the discharge capacity quickly dropped from 3279 to 528 mAh·g−1. After 60 cycles, the capacity was reduced to about 125 mAh·g−1. At the same times, the MR-Si/G compound has superior cycling properties, which the discharge capacity is 1570 mAh·g−1 and the reversible capacity is about 1055 mAh·g−1 in the initial 10 cycles. And the coulombic efficiency is achieved 99% and kept steady in a subsequent loop. It is noted that the specific capacity of complexes has been maintained at about 950 mAh·g−1 after 60 cycles. The results indicate that the graphene layers act as a significant role in the cycling performance of the compound electrode, which due to stabilizes the structure of the electrode and increases the electric conductivity. The rate capability of the MR-Si/G composite at different current densities is displayed in Fig. 6d. It is noted that the specific capacity of 1087,915,753 and 671 mAh·g−1 correspond to at the current densities of 50, 100, 200, 500 mA·g−1, respectively. In an addition, the capacity value is only 950 mAh·g−1 as the current density back to 50 mA·g−1.

Figure 8 shows the cyclic voltammetry of MR-Si-G composite from 0.01 V to 1.5 V at a scan rate of 0. 1 mV s−1. In the first cycle, the peak at 0.75 V during the cathodic sweep relates with the formation of SEI layer, which disappears in the next cycle. It matches the composite discharge curve (Fig. 7b). The peak at 0.16 V are related with the alloying reaction of Si and Li during the lithiation. Two anodic peaks at 0.31 and 0.50 V were observed during the delithiation, which could be attributed to the reaction between amorphous LixSi and amorphous silicon.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cyclic voltammetry of MR-Si-G composite from 0.01 V to 1.5 V at a scan rate of 0. 1 mV s−1

Figure 9 shows the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the MR-Si/G and the pure Si. The downwardly diverging semicircle appearing in the high frequency region is related to the SEI impedance layer, and the oblique lines appearing in the low frequency region are related to the diffusion process of the lithium ions in the composite. In the figure, the impedance of MR-Si/G is lower than that of pure Si, indicating that the graphene significantly improves the conductivity of composite. The reason why is that not only the graphene has good conductivity, but also it can inhibit the cycle of SEI membrane changes, so as to promote the transfer of charge in the battery.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the MR-Si/G and the pure Si


Embedded Si/graphene nano-composite was successfully synthesized via combined with the hydrothermal process and Mg-assisted reduction. The Si nano-particles were fabricated by the magnesium-thermal reduction of amorphous silica nanoparticle, which were uniformly adhered on the graphene. The unique structure of the composite eases the volume expansion and manifests excellent electrochemical properties. The MR-Si/G composites exhibited high reversible capacity, which can be up to 950 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 50 mA·g−1 after 60 cycles. The methodology employed in this study produced a promising unique MR-Si/G composite, which for the next generation of high-capacity lithium-ion battery anode material, provides a reliable basis.


  1. Qiu DF, Bu G, Zhao B, Lin ZX (2015) Mesoporous silicon microspheres fabricated via in situ magnesiothermic reduction of silicon oxide as a high-performance anode material for lithium–ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 19:935–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tao HC, Yang XL, Zhang LL, Ni SB (2014) Chemically activated graphene/porous Si@SiOx composite as anode for lithium ion batteries. Mater Chem Phys 147:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen DY, Mei X, Ji G, Lu MH, Xie JP, Lu JM, Lee JY (2012) Reversible lithium-ion storage in silver-treated nanoscale hollow porous silicon particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:2409–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang S, Shen LF, Tong ZK, Zheng H, Zhang F, Zhang XG (2015) Si nanoparticles encapsulated in elastic hollow carbon fibres for Li-ion battery anodes with high structural stability. Nano 7:7409–7014

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YM, Ahn J, SH Y, Chung DY, Lee KJ, Lee JK, Sung YE (2015) Titanium silicide coated porous silicon nanospheres as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 151:256–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Favors Z, Wang W, Bay HH, Mutlu Z, Ahmed K, Liu C, Ozkan M, Ozkan CS (2014) Scalable synthesis of Nano-silicon from beach sand for long cycle life Li-ion batteries. Sci Rep 4:5623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Q, Yin LW, Ma JY, Li ZQ, Zhang ZW, Chen AL, Li CX (2015) Mesoporous silicon/carbon hybrids with ordered pore channel retention and tunable carbon incorporated content as high performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy 85:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Wu P, Shi HM, Lou FJ, Tang YW, Zhou TG, Zhou YM, TH L (2014) Porous Si spheres encapsulated in carbon shells with enhanced anodic performance in lithium-ion batteries. Mater Res Bull 55:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gua M, He Y, Zheng JM, Wang CM (2015) Nanoscale silicon as anode for Li-ion batteries: the fundamentals, promises, and challenges. Nano Energy 17:366–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen YF, Du N, Zhang H, Yang DR (2015) Facile synthesis of uniform MWCNT@Si nanocomposites as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 622:966–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Q, Yin LW, Gao XP (2015) Reduction chemical reaction synthesized scalable 3D porous silicon/carbon hybrid architectures as anode materials for lithium ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical performance. RSC Adv 5:35598–35607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng XJ, Yang J, Bie YT, Wang JL, Nuli YN, Lu W (2014) Nano/micro-structured Si/CNT/C composite from nano-SiO2 for high power lithium ion batteries. Nano 6:12532–12539

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peres NMR (2009) The electronic properties of graphene and its bilayer. Vacuum 83:1248–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao HC, Fan LZ, Mei YF, XH Q (2011) Self-supporting Si/reduced Graphene oxide nanocomposite films as anode for lithium ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 13:1332–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen J, Yao BW, Li C, Shi GQ (2013) An improved hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon 64:225–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gholami T, Salavati-Niasari M, Bazarganipour M, Noori N (2013) Synthesis and characterization of spherical silica nanoparticles by modified Stoer process assisted by organic ligand. Superlattices Microst 61:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He DF, Bai FJ, Li LX, Shen LM, Kung HH, Bao NZ (2015) Fabrication of sandwich-structured Si nanoparticles-graphene nanocomposites for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 169:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. YJ D, Zhu GN, Wang K, Wang YG, Wang CX, Xia YY (2013) Si/graphene composite prepared by magnesium thermal reduction of SiO2 as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 36:107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu SM, Zhu CL, Ma J, Meng Q, Guo ZP, ZY Y, Lu T, Li Y, Zhang D, Laud WM (2013) Controlled fabrication of Si nanoparticles on graphene sheets for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 3:6141–6146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Jiang YZ, Li YD, Li BB, Li ZH, Niu CM (2015) Preparation of nanographite sheets supported Si nanoparticles by in situ reduction of fumed SiO2 with magnesium for lithium ion battery. J Power Sources 281:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The study supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304077 and 51374175); the Science and Technology Department of Science and Technology of Project in Jiangsu Province (BY2014037-31); the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (No.LAPS15001); the Privileged Development Program of Jiangsu High Education on New Energy Material Science and Engineering, and the Material Corrosion and Protection Key Lab oratory of Sichuan Province (2014CL15) are acknowledged.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YR conceived and designed the experiments. JZ and BY performed the experiments. JZ and BY analyzed the data. JD and WC contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. LZ wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yurong Ren.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Ren, Y., Yang, B. et al. Embedded Si/Graphene Composite Fabricated by Magnesium-Thermal Reduction as Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanoscale Res Lett 12, 627 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Embedded Si/graphene composite
  • Magnesium-thermal reduction
  • Anode material