Sequentially Vapor-Grown Hybrid Perovskite for Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 4 September 2017
Accepted: 5 December 2017
Published: 11 January 2018
High-quality and reproducible perovskite layer fabrication routes are essential for the implementation of efficient planar solar cells. Here, we introduce a sequential vapor-processing route based on physical vacuum evaporation of a PbCl2 layer followed by chemical reaction with methyl-ammonium iodide vapor. The demonstrated vapor-grown perovskite layers show compact, pinhole-free, and uniform microstructure with the average grain size of ~ 320 nm. Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells are fabricated using TiO2 and spiro-OMeTAD charge transporting layers in regular n-i-p form. The devices exhibit the best efficiency of 11.5% with small deviation indicating the high uniformity and reproducibility of the perovskite layers formed by this route.
Hybrid perovskite materials are the most competitive candidates as light absorber of next-generation photovoltaic era with their unique features including intense optical absorption, direct and tunable band gap, high carrier mobility, long charge diffusion length, shallow defect levels with few mid-gap states, and wide tunability on its composition according to metal halide framework and inserted organic species [1–8]. They have been employed in two types of architectures such as mesoscopic nanostructured and simple planar structured. The preparation of high-quality pinhole-free perovskite layers for simplified planar architecture requires substantial effort. Various methods have been used to prepare perovskite layers, such as anti-solvent dripping, sequential dip coating, dual-source vacuum evaporation, and vapor-assisted growth [9–16]. Vacuum deposition presents highly uniform layer formation over the entire substrate area, with thickness control ability. Furthermore, vapor-assisted crystallization is known to reproducibly provide densely packed microstructure through controlled chemical reaction speed via diffusion of organic material [17–26].
Here, we report a novel sequential vapor-processing route by CH3NH3I (MAI)-vapor diffusion into vacuum-deposited PbCl2 layers, resulting in fully covered and highly uniform perovskite layers. Planar n-i-p heterojunction perovskite solar cells are successfully demonstrated by employing TiO2 and 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis-(n,n-di-4-methoxyphenylamino)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) charge transporting layers. Champion cells achieve power conversion efficiencies (PCE) up to 11.5%. Our results show that this route is feasible to fabricate uniform and reproducible perovskite layers in a controlled way.
Devices were fabricated on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass substrates. The substrates were sequentially cleaned in an ultrasonic bath by acetone, methanol, isopropanol, and deionized water and then exposed to ultraviolet-ozone for 15 min. For electron transporting layers, 450 and 600 mM titanium diisopropoxidebis(acetylacetonate) in n-butanol (75 wt% in isopropanol) were double-coated at 2500 rpm for 20 s and annealed at 500 °C for 30 min in air to form compact TiO2 layers. The TiO2-coated substrates were placed in a vacuum chamber, and PbCl2 was evaporated to a rate of 1 Å/s for ~ 16 min at room temperature. Methyl-ammonium iodide (MAI) vapor treatments were carried out in a drying vacuum oven using MAI powder spread around the PbCl2-coated substrates. Subsequently, the as-prepared black samples were washed with isopropanol for the removal of the MAI residue and then annealed at 100 °C for 1 h. For hole transport layers, precursor solutions were prepared by mixing spiro-OMeTAD in chlorobenzene with tert-butylpyridine and lithium bis(trifluoromethylsyfonyl)imide salt in acetonitrile. The solutions were spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 40 s, and then the coated samples were kept in air overnight for oxidation. Finally, device fabrication was completed by thermal evaporation of Au electrodes.
The crystal structure was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV: RIGAKU), and the morphology of the perovskite layer was observed by a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4300: HITACHI). The optical absorbance data were obtained using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1601PC: Shimadzu). The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of the perovskite solar cell devices were recorded with a solar simulator (94021A: Newport) under AM 1.5G (100 mW/cm2) irradiation. During the measurements, the solar cell devices were masked with an aperture area of 0.09 cm2.
Results and Discussion
Photovoltaic parameters of the perovskite solar cells with various perovskite thicknesses
16.30 ± 0.08
0.89 ± 0.02
0.72 ± 0.01
10.40 ± 0.02
17.57 ± 0.12
0.91 ± 0.01
0.67 ± 0.02
10.68 ± 0.39
18.33 ± 0.09
0.91 ± 0.01
0.67 ± 0.02
11.24 ± 0.34
18.73 ± 0.24
0.89 ± 0.02
0.61 ± 0.02
10.23 ± 0.46
19.90 ± 0.01
0.81 ± 0.01
0.59 ± 0.02
9.58 ± 0.27
We reported a novel fabrication route through the physical vacuum deposition of PbCl2 layers and the following MAI vaporization-assisted perovskite growth. The optical absorption and XRD spectra verified the formation of highly crystalline and pure perovskite layers. High quality, compact, and pinhole-free perovskite layers were confirmed with the average grain size of ~ 320 nm. The regular type planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells were fabricated by employing TiO2 and spiro-OMeTAD as electron and hole transporting layers, respectively. The champion cell showed the best efficiency of 11.5% with a small deviation, which means the good reproducibility and uniformity of the perovskite layers produced by this vapor-processing route. As a future work, it is necessary to further develop perovskite layer quality with optimizing device structure to improve the efficiency and reduce the hysteresis behavior while maintaining the benefits of the synthetic route.
This research was supported by the Leading Human Resource Training Program of Regional Neo Industry (2016H1D5A1910305) and Basic Science Research Program (2017R1D1A1A02017758) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). The present research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook University in 2017.
WGC carried out the overall experiments. WGC and FPG wrote the manuscript. SN and CGP helped with the experiments. DWK improved the manuscript. TM supervised this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Baikie T, Fang Y, Kadro JM, Schreyer M, Wei F, Mhaisalkar SG, Graetzel M, White TJ (2013) J Mater Chem A 1:5628View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung HS, Park N-G (2015) Small 11:10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yin W-J, Shi T, Yan Y (2014) Adv Mater 26:4653View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rehman AU, Lee SH, Lee SH (2015) Electron Mater Lett 11:295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xing G, Mathews N, Sun S, Lim SS, Lam YM, Graetzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Sum TC (2013) Science 342:344View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitzi DB, Chem J (2001) Soc Dalton Trans 0:1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park N-G (2015) Mater Today 18:65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- X. Tong, F. Lin, J. Wu, Z. M. Wang, Adv Sci 3, 1500201 (2016)Google Scholar
- J.-H. Im, H.-S. Kim, N.-G. Park, APL Mater 2, 081510 (2014)Google Scholar
- Shin GS, Choi WG, Na S, Ryu SO, Moon T (2017) Electron Mater Lett 13:72View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee B, Lee S, Cho D, Kim J, Hwang T, Kim KH, Hong S, Moon T, Park B (2016) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:30985View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Momblona C, Malinkiewicz O, Roldán-Carmona C, Soriano A, Gil-Escrig L, Bandiello E, Scheepers M, Edri E, Bolink HJ (2014) APL Mater 2:081504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan P, Gu D, Liang GX, Luo JT, Chen JL, Zheng ZH, Zhang DP (2016) Sci Rep 6:29910View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CW, Kang HW, Hsiao SY, Yang PF, Chiang KM, Lin HW (2014) Adv Mater 26:6647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leyden MR, Lee MV, Raga SR, Qi Y (2015) J Mater Chem A 3:16097View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Q, Zhou H, Hong Z, Luo S, Duan H-S, Wang H-H, Liu Y, Li G, Yang Y (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:622View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu M, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ (2013) Nature 501:395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo PF, Liu ZF, Wei X, Yuan CC, Cheng JG, Lu YW (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:2708View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Du T, Wang N, Chen HJ, Lin H, He HC (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:3382View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gujar TP, Thelakkat M (2016) Energy Technol 4:449View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Shi C, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Xiao G, Wang R (2016) Opt Mater 60:230View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Q, Zhou H, Song T-B, Luo S, Hong Z, Duan H-S, Dou L, Liu Y, Yang Y (2014) Nano Lett 14:4158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin S-P, Chang S-K, Lee H-C, Guo P-T, Thiyagu S, Lin C-F (2017) IEEE J Photovolt 7:184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu C, Fan J, Zhang X, Shen Y, Yang L, Mai Y (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:9066View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang B, Lee JS (2017) Adv Mater 29:1701048Google Scholar
- Costa JCS, Azevedo J, LMNBF Santos, A Mendes (2017) J Phys Chem C 121:2080Google Scholar
- Conings B, Babayigit A, Klug MT, Bai S, Gauquelin N, Sakai N, Wang JT-W, Verbeeck J, Boyen H-G, Snaith HJ (2016) Adv Mater 28:10701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao D, Yu Y, Wang C, Liao W, Shrestha N, Grice CR, Cimaroli AJ, Guan L, Ellingson RJ, Zhu K, Zhao X, Xiong R-G, Yan Y (2017) Nat Energy 2:17018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liang PW, Liao CY, Chueh CC, Zuo F, Williams ST, Xin XK, Lin JJ, Jen AKY (2014) Adv Mater 26:3748View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quarti C, Mosconi E, Ball JM, D'Innocenzo V, Tao C, Pathak S, Petrozza A, Snaith HJ, De Angelis F (2016) Energy Environ Sci 9:155View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu N, Shi C, Ying C, Zhang J, Wang M (2015) Appl Surf Sci 357:2372View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Ono LK, Leyden MR, Kato Y, Raga SR, Lee MV, Qi Y (2015) J Mater Chem A 3:14631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vincent BR, Robertson KN, Cameron TS, Knop O (1986) Can J Chem 65:1042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poglitsch A, Weber D (1987) J Phys Chem Lett 87:6373Google Scholar
- Noh JH, Im SH, Heo JH, Mandal TN, Seok SI (2013) Nano Lett 13:1764View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakamiya A, Endo M, Sasamori T, Tokitoh N, Ogomi Y, Hayase S, Murata Y (2014) Chem Lett 43:711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hao F, Stoumpos CC, Liu Z, Chang RPH, Kanatzidis MG (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:16411View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leguy AMA, Hu Y, Campoy-Quiles M, Alonso MI, Weber OJ, Azarhoosh P, van Schilfgaarde M, Weller MT, Bein T, Nelson J, Docampo P, Barnes PRF (2015) Chem Mater 27:3397View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christians JA, Herrera PAM, Kamat PV (2015) J Am Chem Soc 137:1530View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imler GH, Li X, Xu B, Dobereiner GE, Dai H-L, Rao Y, Wayland BB (2015) Chem Commun 51:11290View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, Siempelkamp BD, Liu D, Kelly TL (2015) ACS Nano 9:1955View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Askar AM, Bernard GM, Wiltshire B, Shankar K, Michaelis VK (2017) J Phys Chem C 121:1013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou H, Chen Q, Li G, Luo S, Song TB, Duan HS, Hong Z, You J, Liu Y, Yang Y (2014) Science 345:542View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dualeh A, Tétreault N, Moehl T, Gao P, Nazeeruddin MK, Graetzel M (2014) Adv Funct Mater 24:3250View ArticleGoogle Scholar