Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Fabrication, Characterization, and Biological Activity of Avermectin Nano-delivery Systems with Different Particle Sizes

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2405-1

Received: 19 September 2017

Accepted: 6 December 2017

Published: 9 January 2018

Abstract

Nano-delivery systems for the active ingredients of pesticides can improve the utilization rates of pesticides and prolong their control effects. This is due to the nanocarrier envelope and controlled release function. However, particles containing active ingredients in controlled release pesticide formulations are generally large and have wide size distributions. There have been limited studies about the effect of particle size on the controlled release properties and biological activities of pesticide delivery systems. In the current study, avermectin (Av) nano-delivery systems were constructed with different particle sizes and their performances were evaluated. The Av release rate in the nano-delivery system could be effectively controlled by changing the particle size. The biological activity increased with decreasing particle size. These results suggest that Av nano-delivery systems can significantly improve the controllable release, photostability, and biological activity, which will improve efficiency and reduce pesticide residues.

Keywords

AvermectinNano-delivery systemControlled releaseBiological activity

Background

Pesticides are important for controlling plant diseases and insect pests and to safeguard national food security. Most conventional pesticide formulations are open systems, which have problems such as poor dispersion, degradation of active ingredients, and droplet drift. Active ingredients in pesticides have loss rates of up to 70–90%. This occurs as a consequence of field spraying owing to biodegradation, chemical degradation, photolysis, evaporation, surface runoff, and percolating ground water, all of which raise concerns for food safety and the environment [1, 2]. Improving the application and delivery of pesticides has therefore become an important research topic [35].

In recent years, the development of nanotechnology and nanomaterials has provided a new approach for improving the efficiency of pesticide application [615]. Nanoparticle formulations of pesticides have been proposed to produce a better spatial distribution of pesticides on leaf surfaces, owing to nanoparticles’ small size and large surface area, which provides better efficiency [1619]. Nano-delivery systems for pesticides involve entrapping the active ingredients of pesticides inside polymeric nanomaterials, to allow the slow and controlled release of active ingredients on target crops [2022]. Among different polymers, polylactic acid (PLA) has been extensively used as nanoparticle carriers in controlled release nano-delivery systems for many bioactive molecules due to its non-toxic, good bioavailability and biocompatibility, and approval by the Food and Drug Administration for human use [23, 24]. There are limited study about PLA as carrier materials in the field of pesticide. PLA is a very promising coating material to encapsulate pesticide due to its environmental friendliness, low cost, and easy scale-up.

Nano-delivery systems for pesticides also provide enlarged contact areas among the target pest and pesticide particles [25, 26].

Avermectin (Av) is a highly efficient, broad-spectrum, and safe biopesticide that can control a variety of agricultural pests. Av degrades easily owing to photo oxidation. Av also has a short half-life in water, which affects pest control in field applications. The coefficient of organic carbon adsorption for Av is high. This means that Av does not readily migrate in soil because it tightly binds with organic matter, which affects its pest control in soil. Much effort has focused on protecting the biological activity of Av by microencapsulation technologies [27, 28]. However, the size of Av-containing microcapsules is difficult to control. They are generally large, with sizes of approximately 1–5 μm, and have wide size distributions [29, 30]. Poor dispersion and uniformity, as well as large sizes, are not conducive to improving pesticide adhesion on the surface of leaves or increasing the permeability in harmful insects. Limited investigations have been conducted on the synthesis and biological activity of pesticide nano-delivery systems for Av with different sizes [3134]. Constructing nano-delivery systems for Av by nanomaterial encapsulation can significantly improve its photostability, reduce its soil adsorption or other adverse factors, and improve the control effect of the pesticide. In addition, Av nano-delivery systems also have better penetration and allow for slower and more controlled release of active ingredients on target crops, compared with conventional microcapsules.

The present study aimed to prepare various particle sizes of Av nano-delivery systems by emulsion polymerization using PLA and characterize their performance as a safe and biodegradable carrier. We investigated the effect of particle size on the release properties and biological activity of the Av nano-delivery system [3539]. The concentrations of the active substance and its precursors, and the characteristics of the emulsion system are the primary factors for establishing the size distribution of the final Av nano-delivery system. The Av nano-delivery system showed good particle dispersion with controlled particle size, high Av loading, effective size-control and sustained release properties, and good ultraviolet (UV) shielding and stability.

Experimental

Materials

PLA and Av were provided by Nature Works, and Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Inner Mongolia, P. R. China), respectively. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), 87–90% hydrolyzed with an average Mw of 30,000–70,000, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Shanghai Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). Gelatin was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). The dialysis membranes were purchased from Beijing Tianan Technology Co., Ltd. (People’s Republic of China). Other chemical reagents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). Water used in all experiments was of Milli-Q grade (18.2 MΩ cm, TOC ≤ 4 ppb) and was obtained from a Milli-Q Advantage A10 system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA).

Preparation of Avermectin Nano-delivery System

The Av nano-delivery system was prepared via an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion method combined with an ultrasonic and shearing physical emulsification process. Briefly, PLA and Av were dissolved in methylene chloride as the oil phase. For the water phase, gelatin was dissolved in water at 40 °C, which was then mixed with PVA aqueous solution. Then, the oil phase was dripped slowly into a large volume of the water phase under high shear emulsification (FA25, FLUKO, Ruhr-gebiet, Germany), to prepare a coarse emulsion. The coarse emulsion was then uniformly dispersed by ultrasonic emulsification (JY 92-IIN, SCIENTZ, Ningbo, People’s Republic of China). The uniform emulsion was then solidified under magnetic stirring overnight (RW20, IKA, Staufen, Germany). The hardened Av nano-delivery system was collected via centrifugation and was washed three times with deionized water. Products were collected by centrifugation and then freeze-dried (FD-81, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan) to yield a free-flowing powder. The dried powder was stored at 4 °C until use.

Characterization of Nano-delivery Systems

The morphology of each Av nano-delivery system was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6700 F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. SEM samples were deposited dropwise onto the surface of a silicon slice. The droplet was allowed to dry at room temperature and was then coated with a thin layer of platinum using a sputter coater (EM ACE600, Leica, Vienna, Austria), to prevent charging during SEM observation. The sizes of particles in the Av nano-delivery systems were measured at 25 °C by laser scatter using a zetasizer (Zetasizer NanoZS90; Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).

Determination of Avermectin Loading in the Nano-delivery Systems

The amount of Av in the nano-delivery system was measured at a wavelength of 245 nm, using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer (TU901, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). In detail, the Av-loaded specimens were weighed out and dissolved in chloroform overnight, after which the solution was dried via reduced-pressure distillation. Methanol was then added to dissolve the Av from the dried precipitate. Finally, the mixture was filtered to yield a clear solution that was analyzed by UV-vis spectrophotometry.

Controlled Release of Avermectin from the Nano-delivery Systems

The release profiles of Av from the nano-delivery systems of different sizes were investigated as follows. Av nano-delivery samples of each size were suspended in 10 mL of ethanol/water mixture (1:1, v/v). The suspension was then transferred to a dialysis bag, which was sealed in a brown flask with 90 mL of ethanol/water mixture (1:1, v/v) as the release medium. The flask was incubated in an incubator shaker at 300 rpm at room temperature. After defined time intervals, 5.0 mL of solution was removed and replaced with 5.0 mL of fresh solvent. The release rate of Av from the nano-delivery sample was calculated by measuring the concentrations of Av dissolved in the release medium at different intervals and was used to evaluate the sustained release property. The concentration of Av was measured using a UV-vis spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 245 nm. Technical abamectin (TC, technical grade active ingredient) was used as controls.

Photolysis Behavior of Avermectin in the Nano-delivery System

The photolytic behavior of Av in the nano-delivery system was evaluated with the commercial Av WDG as a control. The samples were dissolved in methanol/water (1:1, v/v) and divided equally into culture dishes, and the resulting samples were irradiated for a desired duration at 25 °C under an UV lamp (500 W), which had a maximum intensity at a wavelength of 365 nm. At specified time intervals (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h), the culture dish was taken out of the reactor and the Av concentration of samples was analyzed.

Stability Tests

The stability of the Av nano-delivery system was tested according to CIPAC MT 46 and GB/T 19136–2003. Samples were packed in glass tubes and stored at 0 ± 2 °C for 7 days and 54 ± 2 °C for 14 days. Changes in the amount of Av in the nano-delivery system were then studied.

Bioassays

Bioassays of the Av nano-delivery system of different sizes were conducted using the leaf-dip method. Samples were diluted with Triton X-100 aqueous solution at different Av concentrations. Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) leaves were immersed in the diluted Av suspension, then dried at room temperature, and attached to a Petri dish. Aphid larvae were introduced into each dish, and the treated aphids were cultured in an incubator at 25 °C and 75% relative humidity. Four replications were conducted to compare with the control test. Mortality was assessed at 48 h after treatment. Concentration-mortality data were analyzed using DPS v12.01 statistical software. The median lethal concentrations (LC50) and their 95% confidence limits were calculated. Commercial WDG was used as a control.

Results and Discussion

Construction and Characterization of the Avermectin Nano-delivery System

The Av nano-delivery systems were constructed according to the procedure shown in Fig. 1. During the process, the water and oil phases were prepared according to the method mentioned above. The oil phase was emulsified in a water phase (oil-in-water emulsion) by high shear emulsification, to prepare a coarse emulsion. The course emulsion was then uniformly dispersed by ultrasonic emulsification. This was followed by stirring, evaporation, and centrifugation of the resulting nanoparticles. The particle size of a delivery system is one of the most important factors affecting the release properties and biological activity of the pesticide. As shown in Fig. 2, Av nano-delivery systems with particle sizes ranging from 344 to 827 nm were constructed by controlling the synthesis parameters. Particle size is an important parameter for the controlled release properties of pesticides. The particle size of the Av nano-delivery systems could be controlled by changing the PVA/gelatin concentration ratio. Various Av nano-delivery systems were prepared with sizes ranging from 344 to 827 nm and Av contents ranging from 33.4 to 57.5% (33.4, 44.9, 45.2, and 57.5%), as shown in Fig. 3. All the Av products had smooth surfaces and spherical particle morphologies.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Schematic showing the preparation of the Av nano-delivery system

Figure 2
Fig. 2

SEM images (ad) and size distributions (e) of Av nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Amounts of Av in Av nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes

Avermectin Release from the Nano-delivery System In Vitro

In recent years, the development of pesticide-release systems has transitioned toward accurate and quantitative release, in contrast to earlier slow and qualitative release systems. To achieve controllable release, the release profiles of the Av nano-delivery systems with various particle sizes were systematically investigated. Figure 4 shows the percentage release of Av from the nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes after the same time interval. The technical Av had a fast release rate and was almost completely released after 25 h. Pesticide lasting validity period needs the sustained release of pesticides to maintain efficacy for a long time. Compared to burst release of the technical abamectin, all the prepared nano-delivery systems released Av at relatively slow speeds and maintained sustained release for longer periods. Av release profiles from the nano-delivery systems consisted of a burst release followed by a gradual release over the 240-h time frame of the experiment. As the delivery system size decreased from 827 to 344 nm, the cumulative release increased from 53.2 to 79.4% after 240 h. The results indicated that the Av release rate from the nano-delivery system gradually increased with decreasing particle size. This was due to a higher surface area being exposed to the surroundings, aiding permeation and effusion of pesticide located in the shells of the nano-delivery system. The results showed that the Av release rate from the nano-delivery system could be effectively controlled by modifying the particle size.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Release behaviors of Av nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes in ethanol/water (50:50, v/v) over 200 h

Biological Activity

The biological activity of Av released from nano-delivery systems of different particle sizes against aphids is shown in Fig. 5. The LC50 of the Av nano-delivery system gradually decreased with decreasing particle size. The bioavailability of nanoemulsions is reportedly higher than that of conventional emulsions because of their smaller particle size and higher surface-to-volume ratio. Therefore, the higher biological activities of Av nano-delivery systems with smaller particle sizes were attributed to the increased dispersibility, wettability, and retention caused by small-scale effects. All the Av nano-delivery systems had lower LC50 values and higher activities than commercial Av WDG. The high efficacy was due to the nano-sized particles enhancing adhesion and penetration of the Av pesticide on the surface of crops, which reduces loss of pesticide due to leakage during spraying.
Figure 5
Fig. 5

Bioassay results of Av nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes

UV-Shielding Properties of Avermectin in the Nano-delivery System

To verify the UV-shielding properties of Av in the nano-delivery system, the photolytic rate of Av was estimated by artificial irradiation. The analysis of the photolysis rate of Av with irradiation time is shown in Fig. 6. The photolytic percentage of abamectin was 18.7% for the nano-delivery system and 46.7% for the commercial Av WDG after 48 h. After 72 h, the photolytic percentage of abamectin was 25.6% for the nano-delivery system and 51.5% for the commercial Av WDG. These results showed that the nano-delivery system exhibited inhibited photolysis of Av because of the protective effect of the wall carrier.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Comparison of Av photolysis percentage with the commercial WDG and nano-delivery system under UV irradiation

Storage Stability

The stabilities of the Av nano-delivery systems with different particle sizes were evaluated by measuring their loading contents at temperatures of 0, 25, and 54 °C. Figure 7 shows that the nano-delivery system remained stable with no major changes in Av loading during storage at room temperature and low temperature. A small loss of Av was observed after 14 days at 54 °C, owing to the degradation of Av at high temperature. These results showed that the Av nano-delivery system had good storage stability.
Figure 7
Fig. 7

Stability of Av nano-delivery system at different storage temperatures

Conclusions

To improve the controlled release, chemical stability, and bioactivity of Av, an Av nano-delivery system with different average particle sizes was synthesized using the emulsion polymerization method. The Av nano-delivery system showed consistent release behavior. The Av release rate from the nano-delivery system gradually increased with decreasing particle size, owing to higher surface area. The biological activity of the Av nano-delivery system gradually increased with decreasing particle size, owing to enhanced adhesion and penetration. The Av nano-delivery system showed good anti-photolysis properties and stability. The delivery system overcomes the shortcomings of current biopesticides, such as their environmental sensitivity, undesirable soil adsorption, and short activity duration. This will improve pesticide efficacy and decrease the required spraying frequency.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0200500), the Major National Scientific Research Program of China (2014CB932200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31701825), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAAS-XTCX2016004), and the Basic Scientific Research Fund of National Nonprofit Institutes (BSRF201503) for funding this study.

Authors’ Contributions

AW and YW carried out the experimental and participated in the design of the study. YW and AW performed the results analysis and drafted the manuscript. AW, YW, CW, CS, and XZ participated in the experimental measurements. ZZ, BC, JY, and DY provided theoretical guidance. YW, HC, and GL supervised the research work and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Information

AW, CW, and JY are PhD students; CS and XZ are assistant professors; YW and BC are associate professors; HC, GL, and ZZ are professors; DY is a graduate student in the Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Nanobiotechnology Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Roy A, Singh SK, Bajpai J, Bajpai AK (2014) Controlled pesticide release from biodegradable polymers. Central Eur Jour Chem 12(4):453–469View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hua NZ (2008) Advance and trend of pesticide formulation development. Agrochemophysica 47(3):79–81Google Scholar
  3. Cui B, Feng L, Wang CX, Yang D, Yu ML (2016) Stability and biological activity evaluation of chlorantraniliprole solid nanodispersions prepared by high pressure homogenization. PLoS One 11(8):e0160877View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sa SMG, Hussein MZ, Sarijo SH (2013) 3,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetate interleaved into anionic clay for controlled release formulation of a new environmentally friendly agrochemical. Nanoscale Res Lett 8(1):362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Barik TK, Sahu B, Swain V (2008) Nanosilica—from medicine to pest control. Parasitol Res 103(2):253View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2013) Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater 12(11):991–1003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW (2012) Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Protec 35(C):64–70View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y, Kumar DS (2010) Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci 179:154–163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu LZ, Hu HC, Xu Y, Jiang S, Chen M et al (2017) From nonluminescent Cs4PbX6 (X = Cl, Br, I) nanocrystals to highly luminescent CsPbX3 nanocrystals: water-triggered transformation through a CsX-stripping mechanism. Nano Lett 17:5799–5804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang XJ, Feng J, Bai YC, Zhang Q, Yin YD (2016) Synthesis, properties, and applications of hollow micro-/nanostructures. Chem Rev 116(18):10983–11060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang HC, Yan ZR, Deng L, Dong H, Jia YH, Ma N, He J, Yu GH (2015) Synthesis and surface modification of cobalt nanoparticles and electromagnetic property of Co/PPy nanocomposites. Rare Metals 34(4):223–228View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang SH, Shang L, Li LL, Yu YJ, Chi CW, Wang K, Zhang J, Shi R, Shen HY, Waterhouse GIN, Liu SJ, Tian J, Zhang TR, Liu HY (2016) Metal–organic-framework-derived mesoporous carbon nanospheres containing porphyrin-like metal centers for conformal phototherapy. Adv Mater 28(38):8379–8387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bian T, Wang C, Lu ZD, Xie RG, Yang QZ, Wu LZ, Tung CH, Liu Z, Yin YD, Zhang TR (2015) A versatile ‘click chemistry’ route to size-restricted, robust, and functionalizable hydrophilic nanocrystals. Small 11(14):1644–1648View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cao YT, Geng W, Shi R, Shang L, Waterhouse GIN, Liu LM, Wu LZ, Tung CH, Yin YD, Zhang TR (2016) Thiolate-mediated photoinduced synthesis of ultrafine Ag2 S quantum dots from silver nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(48):14952–14957View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. He ZF, Su YH, Yang S, Wu L, Liu SY, Ling CQ, Yang HG (2016) Hierarchical structure engineering of brookite TiO2 crystals for enhanced photocatalytic and external antitumor property. Sci Bull 61(23):1818–1825View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Torchilin VP (2014) Multifunctional, stimuli-sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13(11):813View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dizaj SM, Vazifehasl ZH, Salatin S (2015) Nanosizing of drugs: effect on dissolution rate. Res Pharm Sci 10(2):95–108Google Scholar
  18. Ye H, Liu Y, Peng XH (2014) Formation the polypyrrole/chitosan/polylactic acid microencapsules. Adv Mater Res 881-883:83–86View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pan Z, Cui B, Zeng Z (2015) Lambda-Cyhalothrin nanosuspension prepared by the melt emulsification-high pressure homogenization method. J Nanomater 16(1):263Google Scholar
  20. Guan HN, Chi DF, Yu J, Zhang SY (2011) Novel photodegradable insecticide W/TiO2/Avermectin nanocomposites obtained by polyelectrolytes assembly. Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces 83(1):148-154Google Scholar
  21. Deng Y, Zhao H, Qian Y, Lei L, Wang B, Qiu X (2016) Hollow lignin azo colloids encapsulated avermectin with highanti-photolysis and controlled release performance. Industrial Crops Prod 87:191–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Qian K, Shi T, He S, Luo L, Liu X (2013) Release kinetics of tebuconazole from porous hollow silica nanospheres prepared by miniemulsion method. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 169:1–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Juni K, Ogata J, Nakano M, Ichihara T, Mori K, Akagi M (1982) Preparation and evaluation in vitro and in vivo of polylactic acid microspheres containing dibucaine. Chem Pharm Bull 30:3719–3727View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu R, Huang S, Wan Y, Ma G, Su Z (2006) Preparation of insulin-loaded PLA/PLGA microcapsules by a novel membrane emulsification method and its release in vitro. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 51:30–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhao X, Cui H, Wang Y (2017) Development strategies and prospects of nano-based smart pesticide formulation. J Agric Food ChemGoogle Scholar
  26. Cui B, Feng L, Pan Z (2015) Evaluation of stability and biological activity of solid nanodispersion of lambda-cyhalothrin. PLoS One 10(8):e0135953View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang H, Qin H, Li L, Zhou X, Wang W, Kan C (2017) Preparation and characterization of the controlled release avermectin/castor oil-based polyurethane nanoemulsions. Jour Agri Food ChemGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheng WB, Li W, Zhang GX, Tong YB, Liu ZY, Jia X (2015) Study on the UV-shielding and controlled-release properties of a polydopamine coating for avermectin. New Jour Chem 39(4):2752–2757View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Deng Y, Zhao H, Qian Y (2016) Hollow lignin azo colloids encapsulated avermectin with high anti-photolysis and controlled release performance. Industrial Crops Products 87:191–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Y, Cui H, Sun C, Zhao X, Cui B (2014) Construction and evaluation of controlled-release delivery system of abamectin using porous silica nanoparticles as carriers. Nanoscale Res Lett 9(1):2490Google Scholar
  31. Murdande SB, Shah DA, Dave RH (2015) Impact of nanosizing on solubility and dissolution rate of poorly soluble pharmaceuticals. J Pharm Sci 104(6):2094–2102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Nuruzzaman M, Rahman MM, Liu Y, Naidu R (2016) Nanoencapsulation, nano-guard for pesticides: a new window for safe application. Journal Agri Food Chem 64(7):1447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu B, Wang Y, Yang F, Wang X, Shen H, Cui H, Wu D (2016) Construction of a controlled-release delivery system for pesticides using biodegradable PLA-based microcapsules. Colloids Surf 144:38–45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li D, Liu B, Yang F, Wang X, Shen H, Wu D (2016) Preparation of uniform starch microcapsules by premix membrane emulsion for controlled release of avermectin. Carbohydr Polym 136:341–349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Z, Xu S, Wen L, Liu F, Liu A, Wang Q, Sun H, Yu W, Chen J (2006) Controlled release of avermectin from porous hollow silica nanoparticles: influence of shell thickness on loading efficiency, UV-shielding property and release. J Control Release 111:81–88View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Escalada JP, Gianotti J, Pajares A, Massad WA, Amatguerri F, García NA (2008) Photo degradation of the acaricide abamectin: a kinetic study. J Agric Food Chem 56:7355–7359View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Fan T, Feng J, Ma C, Yu C, Li J, Wu X (2014) Preparation and characterization of porous microspheres and applications in controlled-release of abamectin in water and soil. J Porous Mater 21:113–119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao D, Zhang Y, Lv L, Li J (2013) Preparation and release of avermectin-loaded cellulose acetate ultrafinefibers. Polym Eng Sci 53:609–614View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. He S, Zhang W, Li D, Li P, Zhu Y, Ao M, Li J, Cao Y (2013) Preparation and characterization of double-shelled avermectin microcapsules based on copolymer matrix of silica-glutaraldehyde-chitosan. J Mater Chem B1:1270–1278View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement