Skip to content


Open Access

One-Pot Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnSe4 Nanoplates and their Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:7

Received: 6 October 2017

Accepted: 28 December 2017

Published: 10 January 2018


A SeO2 ethanol solution as the facile precursor has been used for the preparation of quaternary Cu2ZnSnSe4 (CZTSe) nanoplates. Monodispersed single-phase CZTSe nanoplates have been prepared successfully by a facile one-pot thermal chemical method. The as-prepared CZTSe nanoplates show uniform morphology with a bandgap of ~ 1.4 eV. As a proof of concept, the CZTSe nanoplates have been used as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for Rhodamine B dye degradation and show high photocatalytic activity and stability. The excellent dye removal is mainly ascribed to the efficient light utilization of CZTSe nanoplates.


Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanoplatesOne-pot thermal chemical methodPhotocatalysis


Chemical pollutants in natural water have aroused extensive attention due to its serious damage to the environment, and photocatalytic degradation technique based on semiconductors by employing solar energy has been considered as a promising solution to this problem [1]. However, typical photocatalysts, such as TiO2 and ZnO, can only absorb ultraviolet (UV) light. In fact, about 50% solar energy is mainly concentrated in the visible light region while UV light accounts for less than 4% of the solar spectrum [2]. To utilize visible light and improve the photocatalytic activity, various efficient photocatalysts have been explored and applied in organic pigment degradation, water splitting, and solar cell absorbers [3]. Among several photocatalysts, copper-based ternary and quaternary chalcogenide semiconductors, such as Cu2SnS3, CuInxGa1-xSe2, and Cu2ZnSnS4, have been of broad interest owing to their outstanding optoelectronic properties with large absorption coefficient (> 104 cm−1), good stability, and suitable bandgap energy (1.0–1.5 eV) [49].

Cu2ZnSnSe4 (CZTSe) nanocrystals and thin films with inexpensive, non-toxic, and earth-abundant constituent elements have been investigated extensively in recent years [8, 1015]; however, there are a few reports related to the study of nanoplate morphology [16, 17]. Hot-injection and one-pot thermal chemical method are usually applied to the synthesis the CZTSe nanostructures [1821]. However, the Se precursors used in these methods are expensive, toxic, or unstable. Herein, a facile Se precursor which dissolves SeO2 powder in ethanol is developed in this study.

Here, we report a one-pot thermal chemical method of CZTSe nanoplate synthesis using a facile Se precursor. The visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity and recycle performance of CZTSe nanoplates were investigated. The CZTSe nanoplates have potential in wastewater treatment.


Synthesis of CZTSe Nanoplates

All chemicals used in this work were purchased from Aladdin and used directly. Typically, 1.0 mmol Cu(acac)2, 0.5 mmol Zn(OAc)2·2H2O, 0.5 mmol SnCl2·2H2O, and 2.0 mmol SeO2 dissolved in 4 mL ethanol were added into 20 mL oleylamine (OLA) in a 100-mL three-neck flask. The mixture was degassed at 130 °C for 1 h, purged with Ar for 30 min, and then heated to 280 °C for 1 h. The nanoplates were washed with hexane and ethanol three times by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 min. The black powder was collected and dried at 60 °C under vacuum. Before photocatalytic reaction, the nanoplates were hydrophilic treated with Na2S to remove the long-chain OLA ligands [8].


Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max 2200, Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 100 mA) and a Raman spectrometer (Inviareflex, Renishaw, UK) coupled with a 514 nm laser were applied to analyze the phase of the samples. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL., Japan) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quatan 250FEG, FEI, USA) measurements were performed to characterize the morphologies of the samples. The UV-vis absorption spectra of CZTSe nanoplate powder and Rhodamine B (RhB) aqueous solution were recorded on a UV/vis spectrometer by using the integrating sphere and cuvette, respectively (Lambda, Perkin Elmer, USA).

Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

Visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity of the CZTSe nanoplates was evaluated by photodegradation of the RhB aqueous solution (10 mg/L) at ambient temperature. A 300-W Xe lamp equipped with a 420 nm cutoff filter was used as a visible light source. Typically, 50 mg photocatalyst was added into 100 mL of RhB aqueous solution. The solution was continuously stirred in the dark for 12 h to ensure the adsorption-desorption equilibrium before irradiation. The concentration of the residual RhB was monitored at a sequence of time intervals by the UV-vis spectrometer at 554 nm to calculate the degradation rate based on the Beer-Lambert Law.

Results and Discussion

In Fig. 1a, all diffraction peaks of the as-prepared CZTSe sample in XRD pattern can be clearly ascribed to the tetragonal kesterite structure of Cu2ZnSnSe4 (JCPDS No. 70-8930). The diffraction peaks at 27.1°, 45.1°, 53.5°, 65.8°, and 72.5° can be indexed to (112), (204), (312)/(116), (400)/(008), and (332) of CZTSe, respectively. Raman scattering was further applied to confirm the pure phase, as shown in Fig. 1b. Three peaks in Raman spectrum also verify the pure phase of the CZTSe nanoplates, and no other binary phases of CuxSe and ZnSe (main peaks at 262 and 252 cm−1, respectively) and ternary phase of Cu2SnSe3 (main peak at 180 cm−1) are observed. Therefore, neither XRD nor Raman result reveals any secondary phase, suggesting the pure quaternary phase of CZTSe nanoplates.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

a XRD pattern and b Raman spectrum of CZTSe nanoplates

Figure 2 shows the SEM, TEM, and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the as-synthesized CZTSe nanoplates. It can be observed in Fig. 2a that the CZTSe samples have plate-like and uniform morphology. The average size of CZTSe nanoplates calculated from Fig. 2b is ~ 210 nm, which matches well with the SEM observation. The selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) shown in the inset of Fig. 2b indicates high crystallization of the nanoplates. Figure 2c exhibits the HRTEM image of a nanoplate, displaying its primarily ordered crystalline structure and 0.33-nm interplanar d-spacing indexed to the (112) of CZTSe.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

a SEM image. b TEM image (inset: SAED pattern). c HRTEM image of CZTSe nanoplates

UV-vis absorption spectrum reveals the optical property of CZTSe nanoplates. It can be seen from Fig. 3a that the CZTSe nanoplates have entire visible light region absorbing performance. The bandgap can be calculated from the equation: αhν = A(hν−Eg)1/2, where A, α, h, v, and Eg are a constant, the absorption coefficient, plank constant, light frequency, and bandgap, respectively. The bandgap of CZTSe nanoplates obtained from Fig. 3b is ~ 1.4 eV, which is a little larger than that of CZTSe bulk due to the quantum confinement effect [9].
Figure 3
Fig. 3

a UV-vis absorption spectrum and b bandgap of CZTSe nanoplates

Photocatalytic activity of as-prepared CZTSe nanoplates is evaluated with photodegradation of RhB aqueous solution under visible light region. It can be seen from Fig. 4a that ~ 90% RhB are photodegraded within 120 min. The stability and reusability of photocatalyst play a key role in the application of disintegrating ecological pollutants. Thus, five cycle experiments were carried out, and the results are shown in Fig. 4b. CZTSe nanoplates keep high photodecomposition activity in cycle tests, indicating their high stability in photocatalytic reaction. It is well known that photo-oxidation process could be mainly related to several active species, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radicals (•O2), and hole (h+). Because both the ECB and EVB of CZTSe are more negative than the standard redox potentials of Eθ (O2/•O2) and Eθ (H2O/•OH), the •O2 rather than •OH can be generated in the photocatalytic process. To further verify the main active species, Argon (Ar), ammonium oxalate (AO), tert-butanol (TBA), and benzoquinone (BQ) were applied for the removal of O2, h+, •OH, and •O2, respectively. The reaction system with corresponding quenchers (0.1 mmol) was illuminated for 120 min, and the results are shown in Fig. 4c. It can be confirmed that the O2 is the necessity in the photo-oxidation process, rarely •OH is produced, and both the •O2 and h+ are active species. The •O2 plays a more important role than h+ for its sharper degradation efficiency decrease after trapping. Figure 4d shows the possible mechanism of the photocatalytic reaction process. Electrons are excited from valence band (VB) to conduction band (CB) under illumination. The photogenerated electrons are captured by O2 in the aqueous solution to form •O2, which is highly oxidative and can degrade RhB into inorganic products. Simultaneously, the holes directly function as oxidants. Thus, the visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity is achieved by the full use of visible light of the CZTSe nanoplates.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

a RhB degradation. b Cycle test. c Effects of various quenchers on the degradation efficiency of RhB. d Scheme of the photocatalytic degradation process


A SeO2 ethanol solution as the facile precursor has been used for the preparation of quaternary CZTSe nanoplates. Monodisperse CZTSe nanoplates have been prepared successfully by a facile one-pot thermal chemical method. As a proof of concept, the CZTSe nanoplates have been used as visible light response photocatalyst for RhB dye degradation. The efficient dye removal is mainly ascribed to the efficient light utilization of CZTSe nanoplates.



This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education Innovation Team Development Program of China (No. IRT16R57, YL), a grant from the Shaanxi province science and technology resource integrated program (No. 2016TZC-G-5-6, RW), and a research fund for Young Talent Recruiting Plans of Xi’an Jiaotong University (No. YX1J007, RW).

Authors’ contributions

ZZH carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript. RQW and ZZH participated in the design of the study and performed the analysis. NL, AHS, and HHW participated in the measurements. RQW, YL, FM, and ZZH supervised the overall study and polished the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Shaanxi Provincial Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China


  1. Li H, Zhou Y, Tu W, Ye J, Zou Z (2015) State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance. Adv Func Mater 25:998–1013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhan X, Wang F, Safdar M, He J (2013) Visible light driven type-II heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: a review. Nano 5:8326–8339Google Scholar
  3. Yuan YP, Ruan LW, Barber J, Joachim Loo SC, Xue C (2014) Hetero-nanostructured suspended photocatalysts for solar-to-fuel conversion. Energy Environ Sci 7:3934–3951View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo Y, Yin X, Yang Y, Que W (2016) Construction of ZnO/Cu2SnS3 nanorod array films for enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 6:104041–104048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yang Y, Que W, Zhang X, Xing Y, Yin X, Du Y (2016) Facile synthesis of ZnO/CuInS2 nanorod arrays for photocatalytic pollutants degradation. J Hazard Mater 317:430–439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kolny-Olesiak J, Weller H (2013) Synthesis and application of colloidal CuInS2 semiconductor nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:12221–12237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ozel F, Aslan E, Istanbullu B, Akay O, Hatay Patir I (2016) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution based on Cu2ZnSnS4, Cu2NiSnS4 and Cu2CoSnS4 nanocrystals. Appl Catal B Environ 198:67–73View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang Y, Que W, Zhang X, Yin X, Xing Y, Que M, Zhao H, Du Y (2017) High-quality Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals hybrid with ZnO and NaYF4: Yb, Tm as efficient photocatalytic sensitizers. Appl Catal B Environ 200:402–411View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Persson C (2010) Electronic and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4. J Appl Phys 107:53710View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Y, Yao D, Shen L, Zhang H, Zhang X, Yang B (2012) Alkylthiol-enabled Se powder dissolution in oleylamine at room temperature for the phosphine-free synthesis of copper-based quaternary selenide nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 134:7207–7210View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kush P, Deka S (2015) Anisotropic kesterite Cu2ZnSnSe4 colloidal nanoparticles: photoelectrical and photocatalytic properties. Mater Chem Phys 162:608–616View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang JJ, Hu JS, Guo YG, Wan LJ (2012) Wurtzite Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals for high-performance organic-inorganic hybrid photodetectors. NPG Asia Mater 4:e2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan FJ, Wang YX, Liu XJ, Wu L, SH Y (2012) Large-scale colloidal synthesis of non-stoichiometric Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals for thermoelectric applications. Adv Mater 24:6158–6163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Scragg JJ, Dale PJ, Colombara D, Peter LM (2012) Thermodynamic aspects of the synthesis of thin-film materials for solar cells. ChemPhysChem 13:3035–3046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Suresh Babu G, Kishore Kumar YB, Uday Bhaskar P, Raja Vanjari S (2010) Effect of Cu/(Zn+Sn) ratio on the properties of co-evaporated Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94:221–226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen S, Tao J, Tao H, Shen Y, Wang T, Pan L (2016) High-performance and low-cost dye-sensitized solar cells based on kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoplate arrays on a flexible carbon cloth cathode. J Power Sources 330:28–36View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li B, Yin P, Zhou Y, Gao Z, Ling T, Du X (2015) Single crystalline Cu2ZnSnS4 nanosheet arrays for efficient photochemical hydrogen generation. RSC Adv 5:2543–2549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wei H, Guo W, Sun Y, Yang Z, Zhang Y (2010) Hot-injection synthesis and characterization of quaternary Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals. Mater Lett 64:1424–1426View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu W, Wu M, Yan L, Zhou R, Si S, Zhang S, Zhang Q (2011) Noninjection synthesis and characterization of Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals in triethanolamine reaction media. Mater Lett 65:2554–2557View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh S, Liu P, Singh A, Coughlan C, Wang J, Lusi M, Ryan KM (2015) Colloidal Cu2ZnSn(SSe)4 (CZTSSe) nanocrystals: shape and crystal phase control to form dots, arrows, ellipsoids, and rods. Chem Mater 27:4742–4748View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin C, Ramasamy P, Kim J (2014) Facile hot-injection synthesis of stoichiometric Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals using bis(triethylsilyl) selenide. Dalton Trans 43:9481–9485View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018