Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Facile Synthesis of Wormhole-Like Mesoporous Tin Oxide via Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly and the Enhanced Gas-Sensing Properties

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2434-4

  • Received: 21 November 2017
  • Accepted: 2 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Wormhole-like mesoporous tin oxide was synthesized via a facile evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) method, and the gas-sensing properties were evaluated for different target gases. The effect of calcination temperature on gas-sensing properties of mesoporous tin oxide was investigated. The results demonstrate that the mesoporous tin oxide sensor calcined at 400 °C exhibits remarkable selectivity to ethanol vapors comparison with other target gases and has a good performance in the operating temperature and response/recovery time. This might be attributed to their high specific surface area and porous structure, which can provide more active sites and generate more chemisorbed oxygen spices to promote the diffusion and adsorption of gas molecules on the surface of the gas-sensing material. A possible formation mechanism of the mesoporous tin oxide and the enhanced gas-sensing mechanism are proposed. The mesoporous tin oxide shows prospective detecting application in the gas sensor fields.

Keywords

  • Evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) method
  • Mesoporous tin oxide
  • Semiconductor gas sensor
  • Gas-sensing properties

Background

Among semiconducting metal oxides, tin dioxide (SnO2), a wide band gap semiconductor (3.6 eV) with a rutile-type crystal structure, has been attracting much attention for various potential applications in the fields of anode materials of lithium-ion batteries [1], dye-sensitized solar cells [2], photocatalysis [35], conductive materials [6], and gas sensors [7] owing to its large band gap, nonstoichiometric nature, excellent electronic mobility, and stability. Nowadays, gas sensors are playing very important roles in the monitoring of environmental pollution [8], indoor air quality, public health, non-invasive disease diagnosis, and industrial applications. Many semiconducting metal oxides like ZnO [9], Co3O4 [10], WO3 [1115], NiO [16, 17], and SnO2 [1823] have been used for gas-sensing applications because of the excellent response, high sensitivity, good reliability, and low cost. Among them, SnO2 has been extensively investigated for gas sensors with a great sensitivity toward several gases, including acetone [24], nitrogen dioxide [25], toluene [26], ethanol [27], formaldehyde [28, 29], and methanol [30].

The properties of SnO2 directly depend on its structural and morphological state, such as the phase, particle size, and band gap. Therefore, many efforts were made to synthesize SnO2 into useful nanostructured morphologies to tailor its chemical and physical properties [17, 31, 32]. So, various SnO2 nanostructures with different morphologies have been obtained, which exhibited good sensing properties to many test gases. Meanwhile, SnO2 with mesoporous structure possesses high specific surface area and narrow pore size distribution, which can provide more in-situ active sites for superior interaction of SnO2 powders with analyte gas and easy gas diffusion into the porous sensing layers; it could further enhance the gas-sensing properties. Mesoporous SnO2 has been previously prepared through various methods including sol-gel and sonochemical methods utilizing supramolecular templates. However, the literatures relating to the preparation of SnO2 indicate that a simple and economic method to synthesize mesoporous SnO2 still poses a challenge and further improvement is necessary. Furthermore, evaporation-induced self-assembly is a pretty effective method for the synthesis of porous nanocrystals and has the advantages of homogeneous pore sizes, controllable morphologies, and mild reaction conditions [33, 34].

In this paper, a facile evaporation-induced self-assembly process was employed to synthesize SnO2 mesostructure under mild conditions for effective gas sensor application. The microstructure, morphology, and the sensing properties of the mesoporous SnO2 were systematically investigated. The test results about gas-sensing properties showed the as-prepared mesoporous SnO2 had a good sensitivity at an appropriate operating temperature, and the enhanced gas-sensing properties were closely related to their interconnected pores and exposed facets. Furthermore, the possible mechanism of enhanced gas-sensing properties was also discussed.

Methods

All chemicals used in the experiments were analytical-grade reagents purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. and used without further purification. In a typical procedure, 0.42 g SnCl4·5H2O and 0.336 g citric acid were first dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water. 0.144 g of structure-directing agent (template) (EO)20(PO)70(EO)20 (P123) was dissolved in 10 mL ethanol, and 1 mL of nitric acid was added as a condensation inhibitor. P123 solution was then added into the tin solution with vigorous stirring. The formed mixture was covered with PE film, stirred at 60 °C in water bath for 2 h, and then put into a drying oven at 60 °C to undergo solvent evaporation process. The as-formed solid was calcined in air for 3 h to remove the template and finally produce the mesoporous SnO2. The mesoporous SnO2 calcined at 350, 400, and 450 °C were named SnO2-350 °C, SnO2-400 °C, and SnO2-450 °C, respectively.

The phase analysis was performed at the D/MAX2550VB+ X-ray diffractometer with an acceleration voltage of 40 kV and an emission current of 300 mA, Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) as radiation source, and graphite as monochromator; 2θ ranged from 0.5° to 80° was detected at a scanning rate of 0.02 °/s. Transmission electron spectroscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of the products were taken by a Tecnai G2-20ST electron microscopy at 220 kV. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K and analyzed using an ASAP 2020 Surface Area analyzer. The specific surface areas were calculated using the Brunnauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation, and estimates of the pore size distributions were deduced by means of Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded on a Nicolet Nexus 670 FTIR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets, and the mixture was pressed into a pellet for IR measurement. The photoluminescence (PL) spectrum was measured on a HITACHI FL-4500 at room temperature using a Xe lamp with a wavelength of 310 nm as the excitation source.

Firstly, the powders of mesoporous SnO2 were mixed with terpineol saturated with methylcellulose to form diluted slurry. Then, the slurry was coated onto an alumina ceramic tube which was printed with a pair of gold electrodes and four Pt wires. After being dried under ambient conditions, the ceramic tube was heated at 350 °C for 3 h. Finally, a small Ni-Cr alloy coil was inserted into the tube as a heater to provide the operating temperature.

The gas-sensing test was performed on a WS-30A system (Weisheng Electronics Co., Ltd., China). Before the measurements, the device was aged at 350 °C for 48 h in air to improve stability. The response was defined as Ra/Rg, where Ra and Rg were the resistances of the sensor exposed in air and in reducing atmosphere, respectively. The response and recovery times were defined as the time taken by the sensor to achieve 90% of the total resistance change in the case of adsorption and desorption, respectively. The humidity-sensing properties of mesoporous SnO2 sensors were studied at the optimum operating temperature under four different relative humidity (RH) (24, 43, 75, and 97%) using saturated solutions of CH3COOK, K2CO3, NaCl, and K2SO4, respectively. The testing principle of the gas sensors was similar to that described in the literature [21].

Results and Discussion

As illustrated in Fig. 1, mesoporous SnO2 powders were prepared through micellar aggregation, evaporation, self-assembly, and surfactants removal. Firstly, the tin species and P123 molecules were evenly mixed to form the original solution. The P123 served as a kind of structure-directing agent in the experiment, which subsequently assembled into micelles as liquid crystal mesophase. Under solvothermal conditions, P123 micelles could be adsorbed on the surfaces of Sn(OH)4 during slow evaporation progress in the solution or SnO2 by weak coordination bonds to form crown-ether-type complex intermediates that inhibit the growth of the SnO2 particles [35]. As a result, uniform SnO2 nanocrystals were obtained. Through the induced self-assembly of these particles and removal of the surfactant by a simple thermal treatment, the mesoporous-structured SnO2 was successfully obtained, which was responsible for high surface area and pore volume.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure of mesoporous SnO2 powders

The crystal structures of as-synthesized mesoporous SnO2 samples with different calcined temperatures were investigated by XRD measurements, and their patterns are shown in Fig. 2. The formation of the mesostructure was confirmed by small-angle XRD patterns (Fig. 2a). Sample SnO2-400 °C shows a stronger diffraction peak around 1.7°, characteristic of the mesoporous structure, while sample SnO2-350 °C shows no characteristic mesoporous peak. The sample SnO2-450 °C exhibits a relatively weaker and broader diffraction peak, which reveals that higher calcination temperature may result in the collapse of the mesostructure and the reduction of the corresponding diffraction peak. Figure 2b indicates the corresponding wide-angle XRD patterns of mesoporous SnO2 calcined at different temperatures. All the diffraction peaks are indexed to the tetragonal rutile structure of SnO2 (JCPDS card No. 41-1445) [36]. The diffraction peaks at 26.7°, 33.9°, and 52.0° can be indexed as the (110), (101), and (211) lattice planes, respectively. Furthermore, the increased intensity of SnO2 reflections for a higher calcined temperature indicates better crystallinity. The highly broadened peaks indicate that the SnO2 powders are composed of small-sized crystallites, which agrees well with the TEM results.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a Small-angle and b wide-angle XRD patterns of mesoporous SnO2 powders

The textural properties and pore structures of different samples were measured by the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm. The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm curves of mesoporous SnO2 calcined at different temperatures (Fig. 3a) exhibit a type IV adsorption branch with a distinct type H3 hysteresis loop, and this type of isotherm is a typical characteristic of mesoporous structures [3741]. The result is further confirmed by the corresponding BJH pore size distributions (Fig. 3b). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET)-specific surface areas (SBET) of SnO2-350 °C, SnO2-400 °C, and SnO2-450 °C were calculated to be 281, 356, and 307 m2/g, without an obvious decrease with the increase of calcination temperature, indicating the good thermal stability of mesoporous SnO2 prepared by one-step evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) method. Meanwhile, the total pore volume (Vpores) and average pore diameter (dpores) were, respectively, calculated to be 0.14, 0.28, and 0.22 cm3/g and 2.9, 5.3, and 4.7 nm (Table 1). It shows a slight increase in textural properties from 350 to 400 °C, which is attributed to the complete removal of organic template and possible interconnection of the pore systems, while the tiny decrease from 450 to 400 °C is due to the slight collapse of the mesostructure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

a Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms. b Corresponding BJH pore size distribution curves of mesoporous SnO2 powders

Table 1

The textural characteristics of all samples

Material

SBET (m2/g)

Vpores (cm3/g)

dpores (nm)

SnO2-350 °C

281

0.14

2.9

SnO2-400 °C

356

0.28

5.3

SnO2-450 °C

307

0.22

4.7

Notes: S BET BET specific surface area, V pores total pore volume, d pores average pore diameter

The mesostructure of the samples could be confirmed by the TEM images. Typical TEM images of as-synthesized SnO2 samples calcined at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 4. It clearly displays the wormhole-like mesopores, which were formed by the aggregation of uniform nanoparticles. Such a pore structure is similar to that of the SnO2 samples fabricated by other researchers [42, 43]. The wormhole-like mesoporous structure can be enhanced by increasing the calcination temperature from 350 to 400 °C (Fig. 4a, b). The (selected area electron diffraction) SAED pattern of SnO2-400 °C (Fig. 4b) demonstrates the cassiterite polycrystalline structure, displaying three broad diffraction rings corresponding to (110), (101), and (221) reflections, respectively, which are well consistent with the XRD results. The HRTEM image of SnO2-400 °C (Fig. 4c) clearly showed its lattice fringe, and the lattice fringe spacing of SnO2-400 °C nanoparticles is 0.32 nm, which represented the (110) basal plane of SnO2 crystals. The mesoporous structure can retain well after calcination at 450 °C (Fig. 4d), indicating the excellent thermal stability of mesoporous SnO2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

TEM images of a SnO2-350 °C, b SnO2-400 °C (inset is corresponding SAED pattern), and d SnO2-450 °C. c HRTEM image of SnO2-400 °C

The FTIR spectra of different samples are shown in Fig. 5a. The characteristic stretching band at 1658 cm−1 is assigned to C=O group. The vibration bands at around 2803, 1381, and 1349 cm−1 are attributed to vibrations of CH2 species. The bands at around 763 and 623 cm−1 are assigned to different vibration modes of O–Sn–O and Sn–O–Sn groups. It indicated that there is a residual organic template in sample SnO2-350 °C. When the calcined temperature increases, the bands at 1658, 2803, 1381, and 1349 cm−1 are decreased because of the decomposition of the organic species. These bands disappeared for sample SnO2-450 °C, indicating that the surfactant template had been removed completely by calcination at 450 °C. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy is a suitable technique to determine the crystalline quality and exciton fine structure [44]. Room temperature PL emission spectra were performed to investigate the optical properties of mesoporous SnO2. Figure 5b shows the PL emission spectra of the mesoporous SnO2 with different calcined temperatures, and the excitation wavelength was 310 nm. The samples calcined at 400 and 450 °C exhibit two main peaks in the emission spectra. One emission band is at about 390 nm, and the other one is at around 458 nm, indicating that increase temperature from 400 to 450 °C has little effect on optical properties of the samples, since the energy gap of bulk SnO2 was 3.62 eV. However, the peaks of SnO2-350 °C are noticeably more than those of the samples calcined at 400 and 450 °C, and this may be attributed to the residual organic template, which results in the surface of structural defects [45, 46]. The peak at 390 nm is independent of the concentration of oxygen vacancies, and it is from structural defects or luminescent centers, such as nanocrystals and defects of SnO2. The defects are mainly located on the surface of the nanostructures and could form a series of metastable energy levels within the band gap of mesoporous SnO2 by trapping electrons from the valence band. This makes a contribution to the luminescence or Sn interstitials formed during the evaporation-induced self-assembly process [47]. The peak at 458 nm is attributed to oxygen-related defects that have been introduced during the growth process [48]. The intensity of two emission bands increases with rising the calcined temperature, while the position of two emission bands has no obvious change.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a FTIR spectra. b The photoluminescence spectra of mesoporous SnO2 samples (the excitation wavelength is 310 nm)

The gas-sensing properties of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors are shown in Fig. 6. Generally, the response of the gas sensors is influenced by its working temperature [49, 50]. Therefore, responses of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors with different calcined temperatures to 200 ppm ethanol at different operating temperatures (Fig. 6a) are investigated to determine the optimum working temperatures. It reveals that the responses of mesoporous SnO2 calcined at 400 °C remained highest at different operating temperatures, and yet, the responses are found to be reduced with an increase or decrease of the operating temperature. However, the responses of mesoporous SnO2 calcined at different temperatures have the similar trend, increasing firstly and decreasing later with rising operating temperature and the maximum occurs at 200 °C, indicating that the optimal working temperature of mesoporous SnO2 calcined at different temperatures to ethanol is 200 °C, and the following discussions are all based on the results measured at 200 °C.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

a Responses of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors to 200 ppm ethanol at different operating temperatures, b responses vs. ethanol concentration, and c response-recovery curve for the mesoporous SnO2 sensors (the operating temperature is 200 °C). d Gas responses of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors to 200 ppm of ethanol, methanal, methanol, and acetone operated at 200 °C

Figure 6b shows the relationship curves tested at 200 °C between responses and ethanol concentration for the mesoporous SnO2 sensors calcined at different temperatures. It shows that the optimum ethanol concentration is 200 ppm for mesoporous SnO2 calcined at different temperatures. Mesoporous SnO2 calcined at 400 °C exhibits the highest response, and its response to 200 ppm ethanol reaches 41.6, which is much higher than that calcined at 350 and 450 °C. Figure 6c displays the response-recovery curves of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors for ethanol, which are tested under the same conditions (the operating temperature is 200 °C) in order to make a comparison. It revealed that the response speed of the SnO2-400 °C sensor is higher than SnO2-350 °C and SnO2-450 °C. The response and recovery time of the SnO2-400 °C sensor was 31 and 2 s, respectively. With the ethanol concentration increasing from 10 to 200 ppm, the gas-sensing properties curves show an increasing tendency, and the maximum response was 41.6 at 200 ppm. However, when the concentration of ethanol continuously increased to 400 ppm, their sensitivity are decreased and shows a leveling off from 400 to 2000 ppm, because the sensitivity of the sensors was saturated. Moreover, the responses of SnO2-350 °C and SnO2-450 °C show the similar varying tendency, but the responses are much lower than those of SnO2-400 °C. Selectivity is another important parameter to evaluate the sensing ability of a gas sensor [51, 52]. Figure 6d shows a bar graph of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors with different calcined temperatures to 200 ppm of ethanol, methanal, methanol, and acetone at the operating temperature of 200 °C. As shown in Fig. 6d, the sensors exhibit the highest response to ethanol against other target gases. In addition, the sensors are less sensitive to acetone. Meanwhile, the response of the mesoporous SnO2 calcined at 350, 400, and 450 °C to 200 ppm of ethanol is 9.3, 41.6, and 30.5, respectively. It can also be observed that the responses of the SnO2-350 °C sensor to 200 ppm of ethanol, methanal, acetone, and methanol are less than 10 at 200 °C. These results demonstrate that the as-prepared mesoporous SnO2 sensors can selectively detect ethanol vapors with the interference of other gases and have a good performance in the operating temperature and response/recovery time.

Relative humidity (RH) has an effect on the gas response of metal oxide-based gas sensors. Therefore, the influence of RH on this mesoporous SnO2 sensor was investigated, and the responses toward 200 ppm of ethanol under different RH are shown in Fig. 7a. It is clear that the responses decreased as the RH increased in comparison with dry conditions. Under 97% of RH, the response was about 17.2, 30.3, and 5.1 for the sensors SnO2-450 °C, SnO2-400 °C, and SnO2-350 °C, which were higher than the values found when RH was 43 and 75%. Moreover, the SnO2-400 °C demonstrated to be less affected by the presence of humidity, showing a lower decrease in ethanol response. The long-term stability of the SnO2-400 °C sensor was tested for 10 days under 200 ppm ethanol at the operating temperature of 200 °C, as shown in Fig. 7b. It is shown that the response changed every day, but the maximal deviations of the responses to ethanol are less than 10%. Clearly, the sensor based on the mesoporous SnO2-400 °C has an excellent long-term stability, which can be used as a promising candidate for practical gas-sensing applications.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

a Response of the mesoporous SnO2 sensors to 200 ppm of ethanol as a function of the relative humidity at 200 °C. b Long-term stability of the SnO2-400 °C sensor to 200 ppm ethanol at 200 °C

Based on the results of gas-sensing properties for the mesoporous SnO2 sensors with different calcined temperatures, it was revealed that the mesoporous SnO2-400 °C sensor has the best comprehensive performance, which can be attributed to the high surface area and pore volume formed through the induction of self-assembly process. It shows a slight decrease in textural and gas-sensing properties when the calcined temperature rises from 400 to 450 °C, indicating that mesoporous SnO2 has good chemical stability and thermal stability. In addition, the decrease is due to the slight collapse of the mesostructure. The mesoporous SnO2-350 °C sensor has the worst overall performance, which is attributed to the channel plugging by the residual organic template. When the calcined temperature rose to 400 °C, the organic template was removed completely and may form the interconnected pore channels to enhance the gas-sensing performance further.

Some ethanol-sensing results of SnO2-based materials from the literature are summarized in Table 2. Our mesoporous SnO2 nanoparticles exhibited a better ethanol-sensing performance. The SnO2-400 °C shows the excellent response 41.6 at 200 °C for 200 ppm gaseous ethanol. The results indicate that the as-synthesized mesoporous SnO2 is a promising gas-sensing material for ethanol detection.
Table 2

Sensing performances of mesoporous SnO2 to ethanol in this work and previously reported sensing materials

Sensing material

Measuring range

Response

Reference

NiO/SnO2 thin film

100 ppm, 250 °C

7.9

[17]

SnO2 nanocrystals

100 ppm, 100 °C

11.2

[18]

SnO2–rGO

100 ppm, 25 °C

3.89

[22]

SnO2 bare

2 ppm, 150 °C

1.01

[25]

hollow SnO2 nanoparticles

100 ppm, 300 °C

63.4

[27]

SnO2 microtubes

50 ppm, 133 °C

3.4

[51]

mesoporous SnO2-350 °C

200 ppm, 200 °C

9.3

This work

mesoporous SnO2-400 °C

200 ppm, 200 °C

41.6

This work

mesoporous SnO2-450 °C

200 ppm, 200 °C

30.5

This work

According to above results, we proposed the mechanism of the enhanced gas-sensing properties in Fig. 8. Generally, the narrow conducting channel in SnO2 nanocrystallines and high-potential barrier between SnO2 nanocrystallines makes the gas sensor show a high resistance value. Meanwhile, the accumulation of SnO2 nanoparticles hinders the effective diffusion of gases, which results in the degradation of gas-sensing properties. Therefore, improving the pore structure and increasing the specific surface area are efficient ways to improve the sensitivity of the sensor. At the micro scale, when the gas sensor was exposed to air, the oxygen species are ionosorbed on SnO2 surface (O2, O or O2−) [18, 53] by trapping the electrons from the conduction band and created a depletion layer close to the particle surface. In dry air, O is the predominant ionosorbed oxygen species [27, 54]; therefore, a reaction between O species ionosorbed on mesoporous SnO2 nanoparticles and ethanol occurs. As a result, the electrons are released back to the conduction band of SnO2 and the O species are transformed into water and carbon dioxide. This results in a decrease in the depletion layer along with a resistance decrease. Therefore, in the experiments, mesoporous SnO2 with high specific surface area can provide more active sites and generate more chemisorbed oxygen spices on the surface, which increases the depletion layer of SnO2. Moreover, the porous structure and nano size of SnO2 particles allow an efficient diffusion of oxygen and test gas (ethanol) to active sites, which makes the sensor show a higher response to target gas (ethanol).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Schematic illustration of ethanol sensing mechanism of mesoporous SnO2

Conclusions

In summary, the SnO2 with mesoporous nanostructures were successfully fabricated by means of evaporation-induced self-assembly technique, using triblock copolymer P123 as the template and tin (IV) chloride pentahydrate as the metal precursor, and calcined at different temperatures. The results revealed that the mesoporous SnO2 have good chemical and thermal stability. In the gas-sensing studies, the mesoporous SnO2 exhibited enhanced gas-sensing properties, such as fast response/recovery time, high sensitivity, and good sensing selectivity to ethanol. Mesoporous SnO2 calcined at 400 °C exhibits the highest response, and its response to 200 ppm ethanol reaches 41.6. This might be attributed to their high specific surface area and interconnected pores structure, which can provide more active sites and generate more chemisorbed oxygen spices to promote the diffusion of ethanol molecules and their adsorption on the surface of the SnO2. We believe that the mesoporous SnO2 could have excellent detecting application in the field of pollution detecting, medical diagnosis, and industrial security.

Abbreviations

BET: 

Brunauer-Emmet-Teller

BJH: 

Barrett-Joyner-Halenda

d pores

Average pore diameter

EISA: 

Evaporation-induced self-assembly

JCPDS: 

Joint Committee Powder Diffraction Standards

P123: 

(EO)20(PO)70(EO)20

PL: 

Photoluminescence

S BET

Specific surface areas

SnO2

Tin oxide

TEM: 

Tansmission electron microscopy

V pores

Total pore volume

XRD: 

X-ray diffraction

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704030), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017 M610617, 2017 M623182), Shaanxi Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017BSHEDZZ10), the Special Fund for Basic Science Research of Central Colleges of Chang’an University (310831171002), and the Training Program of Innovationand Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (201710710273).

Authors’ Contributions

XL and KP developed the concept. XL and KP conceived the project and designed the experiments. XL wrote the final paper. XL and KP wrote the initial drafts of the work. XL designed the experiments and synthesized and characterized the materials. XL and KP analyzed the data. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710064, China
(2)
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

References

  1. Liu R, Li D, Wang C, Li N, Li Q, Lü X, Spendelow JS, Wu G (2014) Core-shell structured hollow SnO2-polypyrrole nanocomposite anodes with enhanced cyclic performance for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 6:73–81View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn SH, Kim DJ, Chi WS, Kim JH (2013) One-dimensional hierarchical nanostructures of TiO2 nanosheets on SnO2 nanotubes for high efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 25:4893–4897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yang L, Huang J, Shi L, Cao L, Zhou W, Chang K, Meng X, Liu G, Jie Y, Ye J (2017) Efficient hydrogen evolution over Sb doped SnO2 photocatalyst sensitized by Eosin Y under visible light irradiation. Nano Energy 36:331–340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sun M, Su Y, Du C, Zhao Q, Liu Z (2014) Self-doping for visible light photocatalytic purposes: construction of SiO2/SnO2/SnO2:Sn2+ nanostructures with tunable optical and photocatalytic performance. RSC Adv 4:30820–30827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sun M, Zhao Q, Du C, Liu Z (2015) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity in BiOCl/SnO2: heterojunction of two wide band-gap semiconductors. RSC Adv 5:22740–22752View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong W, Xu J, Wang C, Lu Y, Liu X, Wang X, Yuan X, Wang Z, Lin T, Sui M, Chen IW, Huang F (2017) A robust and conductive black tin oxide nanostructure makes efficient lithium-ion batteries possible. Adv Mater 29:1700136View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Barr TJ, Sampaio RN, DiMarco BN, James EM, Meyer GJ (2017) Phantom electrons in mesoporous nanocrystalline SnO2 thin films with cation-dependent reduction onsets. Chem Mater 29:3919–3927View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang J, Liu X, Neri G, Pinna N (2016) Nanostructured materials for room-temperature gas sensors. Adv Mater 28:795–831View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Drobek M, Kim J-H, Bechelany M, Vallicari C, Julbe A, Kim SS (2016) MOF-based membrane encapsulated ZnO nanowires for enhanced gas sensor selectivity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:8323–8328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tan W, Tan J, Li L, Dun M, Huang X (2017) Nanosheets-assembled hollowed-out hierarchical Co3O4 microrods for fast response/recovery gas sensor. Sens Actuators B 249:66–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yin L, Chen D, Feng M, Ge L, Yang D, Song Z, Fan B, Zhang R, Shaoad G (2015) Hierarchical Fe2O3@WO3 nanostructures with ultrahigh specific surface areas: microwave-assisted synthesis and enhanced H2S-sensing performance. RSC Adv 5:328–337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen D, Ge L, Yin L, Shi H, Yang D, Yang J, Zhang R, Shao G (2014) Solvent-regulated solvothermal synthesis and morphology-dependent gas-sensing performance of low-dimensional tungsten oxide nanocrystals. Sens Actuators B 205:391–400View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yin L, Chen D, Hu M, Shi H, Yang D, Fan B, Shao G, Zhang R, Shao G (2014) Microwave-assisted growth of In2O3 nanoparticles on WO3 nanoplates to improve H2S-sensing performance. J Mater Chem A 2:18867–18874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen D, Hou X, Li T, Yin L, Fan B, Wang H, Li X, Xu H, Lu H, Zhang R, Sun J (2011) Effects of morphologies on acetone-sensing properties of tungsten trioxide nanocrystals. Sens Actuators B 153:373–381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen D, Hou X, Wen H, Wang Y, Wang H, Li X, Zhang R, Lu H, Xu H, Guan S, Sun J, Gao L (2010) The enhanced alcohol-sensing response of ultrathin WO3 nanoplates. Nanotechnology 21:035501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li X, Fu L, Liu T, Yang H (2014) Mechanochemical synthesis of NiO nanoparticles: insight into the nature of preferred growth orientation. Nano 9:1450046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang J, Zhu Y, Wu D, Zhang C, Xu S, Xiong D, Yang P, Wang L, Chu PK (2017) Gas sensing properties of NiO/SnO2 heterojunction thin film. Sens Actuators B 252:1163–1168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yin L, Chen D, Cui X, Ge L, Yang J, Yu L, Zhang B, Zhang R, Shao G (2014) Normal-pressure microwave rapid synthesis of hierarchical SnO2@rGO nanostructures with superhigh surface areas as high-quality gas-sensing and electrochemical active materials. Nano 6:13690–13700Google Scholar
  19. Zhang D, Sun Y e, Jiang C, Zhang Y (2017) Room temperature hydrogen gas sensor based on palladium decorated tin oxide/molybdenum disulfide ternary hybrid via hydrothermal route. Sens Actuators B 242:15–24View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang D, Sun Y e, Li P, Zhang Y (2016) Facile fabrication of MoS2-modified SnO2 hybrid nanocomposite for ultrasensitive humidity sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:14142–14149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang D, Chang H, Li P, Liu R, Xue Q (2016) Fabrication and characterization of an ultrasensitive humidity sensor based on metal oxide/graphene hybrid nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B 225:233–240View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang D, Liu J, Chang H, Liu A, Xia B (2015) Characterization of a hybrid composite of SnO2 nanocrystal-decorated reduced graphene oxide for ppm-level ethanol gas sensing application. RSC Adv 5:18666–18672View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang D, Liu A, Chang H, Xia B (2015) Room-temperature high-performance acetone gas sensor based on hydrothermal synthesized SnO2-reduced graphene oxide hybrid composite. RSC Adv 5:3016–3022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li F, Zhang T, Gao X, Wang R, Li B (2017) Coaxial electrospinning heterojunction SnO2/Au-doped In2O3 core-shell nanofibers for acetone gas sensor. Sens Actuators B 252:822–830View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim HW, Na HG, Kwon YJ, Kang SY, Choi MS, Bang JH, Wu P, Kim SS (2017) Microwave-assisted synthesis of graphene-SnO2 nanocomposites and their applications in gas sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:31667–31682View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. J-g K, Park J-S, Lee H-J (2017) Pt-doped SnO2 thin film based micro gas sensors with high selectivity to toluene and HCHO. Sens Actuators B 248:1011–1016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zito CA, Perfecto TM, Volanti DP (2017) Impact of reduced graphene oxide on the ethanol sensing performance of hollow SnO2 nanoparticles under humid atmosphere. Sens Actuators B 244:466–474View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang J, Wang S, Dong R, Zhang L, Zhu Z, Gao X (2016) One-pot synthesis of SnO2 hollow microspheres and their formaldehyde sensor application. Mater Lett 184:9–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y, Chen N, Deng D, Xing X, Xiao X, Wang Y (2017) Formaldehyde detection: SnO2 microspheres for formaldehyde gas sensor with high sensitivity, fast response/recovery and good selectivity. Sens Actuators B 238:264–273View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang J, Xu Y, Xu W, Zhang M, Chen X (2015) Simplified preparation of SnO2 inverse opal for methanol gas sensing performance. Micropor Mesopor Mat 208:93–97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen Y, Tu Y, Zhang Y, Lu J, Fang B (2017) Fabrication and enhanced electrocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanotubes based three-dimensionally macroporous SnO2 with mesoporous walls. Chem Eng J 311:100–110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bulemo PM, Cho H-J, Kim N-H, Kim I-D (2017) Mesoporous SnO2 nanotubes via electrospinning-etching route: highly sensitive and selective detection of H2S molecule. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:26304–26313View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Florent M, Xue C, Zhao D, Goldfarb D (2012) Formation mechanism of cubic mesoporous carbon monolith synthesized by evaporation-induced self-assembly. Chem Mater 24:383–392View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Fu L, Yang H, Hu Y, Wu D, Navrotsky A (2017) Tailoring mesoporous γ-Al2O3 properties by transition metal doping: a combined experimental and computational study. Chem Mater 29:1338–1349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Skoda D, Styskalik A, Moravec Z, Bezdicka P, Bursik J, Mutine PH, Pinkas J (2016) Mesoporous SnO2-SiO2 and Sn-silica-carbon nanocomposites by novel non-hydrolytic templated sol-gel synthesis. RSC Adv 6:68739–68747View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin X, Chen L, Li C, Hao Q, Liu S, Li Q, Zhang E, Wang T (2011) Synthesis of mesoporous SnO2 spheres via self-assembly and superior lithium storage properties. Electrochim Acta 56:2358–2363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng K, Yang H (2017) Carbon hybridized montmorillonite nanosheets: preparation, structural evolution and enhanced adsorption performance. Chem Commun 53:6085–6088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Li X, Yang Q, Ouyang J, Yang H, Chang S (2016) Chitosan modified halloysite nanotubes as emerging porous microspheres for drug carrier. Appl Clay Sci 126:306–312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Peng K, Fu L, Yang H, Ouyang J, Tang A (2017) Hierarchical MoS2 intercalated clay hybrid nanosheets with enhanced catalytic activity. Nano Res 10:570–583View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Peng K, Fu L, Li X, Ouyang J, Yang H (2017) Stearic acid modified montmorillonite as emerging microcapsules for thermal energy storage. Appl Clay Sci 138:100–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Peng K, Fu L, Yang H, Ouyang J (2016) Perovskite LaFeO3/montmorillonite nanocomposites: synthesis, interface characteristics and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Sci Rep 6:19723View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wen Z, Wang G, Lu W, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Li J (2007) Enhanced photocatalytic properties of mesoporous SnO2 induced by low concentration ZnO doping. Cryst Growth Des 7:1722–1725View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Li X, Ouyang J, Zhou Y, Yang H (2015) Assembling strategy to synthesize palladium modified kaolin nanocomposites with different morphologies. Sci Rep 5:13763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Li X, Fu L, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) Microwave-assisted synthesis and interfacial features of CdS/kaolinite nanocomposite. Colloid Surface A 443:72–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ahmad N, Khan S (2017) Effect of (Mn-Co) co-doping on the structural, morphological, optical, photoluminescence and electrical properties of SnO2. J Alloys Compd 720:502–509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun M, Zhao Q, Liu X, Du C, Liu Z (2015) Comparative study on sandwich-structured SiO2@Ag@SnO2 and inverse SiO2@SnO2@Ag: key roles of shell ordering and interfacial contact in modulating the photocatalytic properties. RSC Adv 5:81059–81068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Huang L, Pu L, Shi Y, Zhang R, Gu B, Du Y, Wright S (2005) Controlled growth of well-faceted zigzag tin oxide mesostructures. Appl Phys Lett 87:163124View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ding J, Yan X, Li J, Shen B, Yang J, Chen J, Xue Q (2011) Enhancement of field emission and photoluminescence properties of graphene-SnO2 composite nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4299–4305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyagi P, Sharma A, Tomar M, Gupta V (2017) A comparative study of RGO-SnO2 and MWCNT-SnO2 nanocomposites based SO2 gas sensors. Sens Actuators B 248:980–986View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Li X, Tang A (2016) Pd modified kaolinite nanocomposite as a hydrogenation catalyst. RSC Adv 6:15585–15591View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang W, Cheng X, Zhang X, Xu Y, Gao S, Zhao H, Huo L (2017) High selectivity to ppb-level HCHO sensor based on mesoporous tubular SnO2 at low temperature. Sens Actuators B 247:664–672View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Peng K, Fu L, Ouyang J, Yang H (2016) Emerging parallel dual 2D composites: natural clay mineral hybridizing MoS2 and interfacial structure. Adv Funct Mater 26:2666–2675View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Gurlo A (2006) Interplay between O2 and SnO2: oxygen ionosorption and spectroscopic evidence for adsorbed oxygen. ChemPhysChem 7:2041–2052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Keshtkar S, Rashidi A, Kooti M (2017) Development of tin dioxide quantum dots/multi-walled carbon nanotubes and tin dioxide quantum dots/carbon nanohorns nanohybrids as low temperatures natural gas sensors. Ceram Int 43:14326–14333View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement