Open Access

Acidic Peptizing Agent Effect on Anatase-Rutile Ratio and Photocatalytic Performance of TiO2 Nanoparticles

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:48

Received: 11 December 2017

Accepted: 28 January 2018

Published: 9 February 2018


TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized from titanium isopropoxide by a simple peptization method using sulfuric, nitric, and acetic acids. The effect of peptizing acid on physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 powders was studied. The structural properties of synthesized TiO2 powders were analyzed by using XRD, TEM, N2-physisorption, Raman, DR UV-vis, FTIR, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques. The characterization results showed that acetic acid peptization facilitated the formation of pure anatase phase after thermal treatment at 500 °C; in contrast, nitric acid peptization led to a major rutile phase formation (67%). Interestingly, the sample peptized using sulfuric acid yielded 95% anatase and 5% rutile phases. The photocatalytic activity of synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles was evaluated for degradation of selected organic dyes (crystal violet, methylene blue, and p-nitrophenol) in aqueous solution. The results confirmed that the TiO2 sample peptized using nitric acid (with rutile and anatase phases in 3:1 ratio) offered the highest activity for degradation of organic dyes, although, TiO2 samples peptized using sulfuric acid and acetic acid possessed smaller particle size, higher band gap energy, and high surface area. Interestingly, TiO2 sample peptized with nitric acid possessed relatively high theoretical photocurrent density (0.545 mAcm−2) and pore diameter (150 Å), which are responsible for high electron-hole separation efficiency and diffusion and mass transportation of organic reactants during the photochemical degradation process. The superior activity of TiO2 sample peptized with nitric acid is due to the effective transfer of photogenerated electrons between rutile and anatase phases.


PhotocatalysisDegradationRamanNanoTiO2 Peptizing acidOrganic dyes


Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a widely known semiconductor material for its use in many applications, including solar energy conversion, pollution control, and photocatalysis [13]. TiO2 generally has three polymorphs, namely anatase, rutile, and brookite. It was reported that anatase and brookite can be transformed into rutile after thermal treatment at high temperature (< 610 °C) [4, 5]. TiO2 anatase is known to be an active photocatalyst for degradation of organic pollutants [1, 58]. It was observed that the size, crystalline phase, and porosity of the TiO2 samples have a strong influence over their applications [9]. Low-temperature synthesis of porous nanosized TiO2 requires longer synthesis times [1012]. Li et al. [13] synthesized pure anatase and mixture of rutile and anatase phases by thermally treating the amorphous TiO2. The formation of pure anatase involves thermal treatment at high temperature (500 °C) [14], which often causes sintering of the TiO2 nanostructures. Synthesis of pure crystalline anatase at lower temperatures is an interesting topic of research [15]. Sol-gel and hydrothermal synthesis methods [16] were used to prepare a well-crystalline TiO2 at low temperature and short reaction time [17]. Wang et al. [12] synthesized highly crystalline anatase and rutile nanoparticles by hydrothermal HNO3 peptized TiO2 sols. However, the hydrothermal method demands special synthesis conditions and costly equipment which could bare high pH and temperatures [18].

The sol-gel synthesis method was used by utilizing the titanium alkoxide as Ti precursor at a mild temperature (< 100 °C), and it yielded highly dispersed nanosized TiO2 samples [16]. The chemical peptization method was adapted for the synthesis of stable metal oxide nanostructures including TiO2 [19], where the coagulated suspension dissolves and recrystallizes into the stable solution of nanoparticles with the peptizing agent [20]. It was reported that the nature of peptizing acid has an effect on the physicochemical characteristics such as crystallite size, composition, and morphology of particles [21]. Zaban et al. [22] synthesized TiO2 colloids with HNO3 and CH3COOH under hydrothermal conditions and observed the formation of anatase and brookite mixture in both cases. Liu et al. [23] obtained TiO2 hydrosol from metatitanic acid under different peptizing agents and studied the influence of peptizing conditions on the structural and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 hydrosols. Kanna and Wongnawa [24] employed sol-gel synthesis method to obtain amorphous-anatase-rutile by using different acids such as HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, H3PO4, and CH3COOH. The authors observed that presence of sulfate and phosphate groups are responsible for the inhibition of the growth of rutile phase. Later, Alphonse et al. [25] synthesized TiO2 aggregates, which are composed of anatase and brookite phase by hydrolysis of titanium isopropoxide in a highly acidic medium. Parra et al. [26] studied the reaction pathway in the synthesis of anatase nanoparticles with acetic acid. They used FTIR and NMR techniques to conclude that acetate ions act as bidentate ligand between two Ti centers.

Zhou et al. [27] studied the effect of HCl, HNO3, and CH3COOH in solvothermal method to synthesize 3D TiO2 structures with different morphology. The authors concluded that the sample synthesized with 0.68 M HCl possessed both anatase/rutile phases and offered highest photocatalytic activity due to its unique morphology and optical properties. Tobaldi et al. [28] adopted controlled hydrolysis/peptization of titanium isopropoxide with HNO3, HBr, and HCl to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles. It was observed that halide ions enhanced the anatase-to-rutile phase transition, and the samples contained up to 77 wt% rutile and 5 wt% brookite after calcination at 450 °C.

In earlier publication [29], synthesis of nanosize TiO2 powders by acidic peptization of xerogels under atmospheric humidity conditions was performed. It was observed that the acidic peptization accompanied with ultrasonic vibrations has an effect on TiO2 structural properties. However, only few studies were devoted to study the effect of peptizing conditions on the formation of rutile phase and its subsequent effect on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. In this paper, we examined the influence of nature of peptizing acid (H2SO4, HNO3, and CH3COOH) on the formation of rutile phase and its influence in the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 nanoparticles in the degradation of three different organic pollutants (crystal violet (CV), methylene blue (MB), and p-nitrophenol (p-NP)).


Preparation of TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Different Peptizing Acids

Titanium tetra-isopropoxide [Ti(OPri)4] was used as Ti precursor, and the hydrolysis of Ti(OPri)4 was carried out under standard atmospheric conditions [29]. The typical synthesis procedure can be described as follows: 50 mL of Ti(OPri)4 was placed in a dark glass bottle, and the bottle was left in the fume hood for 15 days. The temperature and humidity of the fume hood were measured as 25 ± 5 °C and 50 ± 10%, respectively. The hydrolysis of the Ti precursor was completed in 15 days, and the resulted solution was transformed into a gel, which was then dried to obtain xerogel. The peptizing acid (100 mL of 1 N CH3COOH or HNO3 or H2SO4) was pipetted into a glass beaker, and the known amount of amorphous xerogel powder (2.0 g) was slowly added to the peptizing acid under constant stirring. Then, the beaker was placed in an ultrasonic bath which was maintained at 40 °C, and the mixture was subjected to ultrasonic treatment for 10 min. The peptized TiO2 nanoparticles were collected after centrifugation. Then, the materials were washed with distilled water and calcined for 3 h at 500 °C. The synthesized samples were labeled as TiO2 acronym prefix after their peptizing acid as “ace,” “nit,” and “sul” corresponding to CH3COOH, HNO3, and H2SO4, respectively.

Material Characterization

The powder X-ray diffraction profiles were collected using a Philips PW1700 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation and graphite monochromator with automatic divergent slit. The XRD profiles were indexed with standard JCPDS data. Spurr and Myers [30] formula [Eq. (1)] was used to determine the weight fractions of anatase and rutile phases.
$$ {X}_{\mathrm{R}}=1/\left[1+k\ \left({I}_{\mathrm{A}}/{I}_{\mathrm{R}}\right)\right] $$
where IA and IR are the integrated intensities of (101) reflection of anatase and (110) reflection of rutile, respectively. The empirical constant k was taken as 0.80 in this work. The crystallite size of the synthesized samples was measured using the Scherrer formula [Eq. (2)] and anatase (101) and rutile (110) reflections.
$$ D= B\lambda /{\beta}_{1/2}\cos \theta $$
where D is the average crystallite size of the phase, B is the Scherrer constant (0.89), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation (1.54056 Å), β1/2 is the full width at half maximum of the reflection, and θ is the diffraction angle.

TEM analysis of the samples was carried out using Philips CM200FEG microscope equipped with a field emission gun at 200 kV. The coefficient of spherical aberration Cs = 1.35 mm was applied. HRTEM images with a pixel size of 0.044 nm were taken with a CCD camera. The laser Raman spectral analysis of the samples was carried out using Bruker Equinox 55 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with an FRA106/S FT-Raman module and a liquid N2-cooled Ge detector using the 1064-nm line of a Nd:YAG laser with an output laser power of 200 mW.

N2-physisorption measurements were carried using ASAP 2010 instrument, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, USA. Specific surface area (SBET) of the samples were measured using N2-adsorption values and the BET equation. The pore width and the pore volume of the samples were determined by applying the BJH method.

Diffusive reflectance UV-vis spectra for synthesized TiO2 samples were recorded using Thermo Scientific Evolution spectrophotometer in the wavelength range of 220–700 nm. Band gap energy of the samples was determined using Kubelka-Munk transformation (K) as presented in Eq. (3).
$$ K=\frac{{\left(1-R\right)}^2}{2R} $$
where R is the reflectance. The wavelengths (nm) were translated into energies (eV), and a plot of \( {\left(\mathrm{Kh}\upnu \right)}^{0.5} \)vs. hν was drawn. The band gap energy (eV) was estimated as the intersection of the two slopes of the drawn curve.

The X-ray photoelectron spectra of the samples were collected using Thermo Scientific Escalab 250 Xi XPS instrument with Al Kα X-rays having a spot size of 650 mm. The peak shift due to charge compensation was corrected using the binding energy of C1s peak. The data was acquired using pass energy of 100 eV, dwell time 200 ms with a step size of 0.1 eV and 10–30 scans.

Photocatalytic Degradation of Crystal Violet, Methylene Blue, and p-Nitrophenol

The photocatalytic degradation of CV, MB, and p-NP experiments were conducted in a glass reactor using synthesized TiO2 samples as a photocatalyst under UV irradiation for different reaction times. Total six black UV lamps (F20 T8 BLB) with 18 W power and 60 × 2.5 cm dimensions were used. The total power of the UV irradiation at the surface of an aqueous organic dye solution was measured with a Newport 918DUVOD3 detector, and power meter was measured as 13 Wm−2. One hundred milligrams of catalyst was added to 100 mL of aqueous organic pollutant (10 ppm) solution. Prior to the evaluation of photocatalytic efficiency of the catalyst, the organic dye solution was equilibrated with catalyst by stirring for 45 min to stabilize the adsorption of organic dye on the surface of the catalyst. The photocatalytic degradation of CV, MB, and p-NP was monitored by measuring the absorbance of organic dye at a regular time interval by using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Evolution 160 UV-vis spectrophotometer. The degradation percentage was calculated using the expression
$$ \eta =\left(1-C/{C}_0\right)\times 100 $$

Where C0 is the concentration of organic dye before illumination and C is the concentration after a certain reaction time.

The stability of the photocatalysts was analyzed by the reusability experiments. The regeneration of the catalyst was carried out using a simple procedure. After the first cycle of activity measurement, the catalyst was filtered from the photoreactor and the aliquots by centrifugation. The obtained catalyst was thoroughly washed with a distilled water and acetone. The catalyst was dried at 50 °C for 2 h and then reused for the next cycle of the photocatalysis measurements. Similarly, the experiment was repeated for several cycles to study the stability of the catalyst.

Results and Discussion

X-ray Powder Diffraction

The X-ray diffraction patterns of calcined TiO2-ace, TiO2-nit, and TiO2-sul samples are displayed in Fig. 1. The XRD peak positions and intensities for TiO2 phases presented in the samples are complimented with the JCPDS database. It is known that the anatase phase shows major diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 24.8°, 37.3°, 47.6°, 53.5°, 55.1°, and 62.2° matched to (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (204) crystal planes [JCPDS No. 21-1272]. On the other hand, the rutile phase shows major diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 27.0°, 35.6°, 40.8°, 54.0°, 53.9°, 56.1°, and 61.0° which corresponds to crystal planes of (110), (101), (200), (111), (210), (211), (220), (002), and (310) [JCPDS No. 21-1276]. The crystallite size and weight fractions of anatase and rutile phases presented in the samples were determined using Scherrer formula and Spurr and Myers method, respectively. The powder XRD pattern of TiO2-ace sample showed that it is composed of pure anatase phase (100%) with a particle size of 48 nm (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Powder XRD patterns of the calcined TiO2 samples (reprinted with permission from [29]. Copyright @ 2017 Elsevier)

Table 1

Results From XRD, TEM, and N2-physisorption Measurements




SBET(m2 g−1)

Pore Volume (cm3 g− 1)

Pore Diameter (Å)

Phase (%)

Size (nm)

Phase (%)

Size (nm)
































aParticle size

bCrystallite size

The TiO2-sul sample possessed majorly anatase phase (95%) with particle size around 23 nm; however, a small diffraction peak corresponding to (110) plane of the rutile phase can be seen in this sample. In contrast, TiO2-nit sample showed XRD reflections for both anatase and rutile phases with a crystallite size of 41 nm and 50 nm, respectively. It is observed that the rutile is the major phase (67%) in this sample. These results indicating that nature of peptizing acid play a role in the formation of TiO2 phase.

High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

TEM was performed to examine the size of the particles, crystallinity, and morphology of synthesized TiO2 nanopowders. The TEM and HRTEM pictures of synthesized TiO2 nanopowders are displayed in Fig. 2. It can be seen that the TiO2-sul sample consists closely packed agglomerated anatase particles with estimated average grain size about 7 nm. The TiO2-nit sample possessed nanoparticles sized between 10 and 20 nm with spherical morphology and also big sheets with 20 nm width. In contrast, TiO2-ace sample consists of TiO2 nanoparticles (15–20 nm) consisted of mostly defined spherical morphology. Vinogradov and Vinogradov [31] also observed the similar type of results that the small size aggregates were detected when strong peptizing acids such as HNO3 and H2SO4 were used for the peptization. The crystallite size measured by Scherer’s formula resulted in larger crystallite sizes compared to grain size measured with TEM analysis. As reported previously, crystallite size is different from grain size; however, crystallite size could match with the grain size in some cases [32]. It can be observed that the HRTEM images of TiO2-sul and TiO2-ace samples showed particles that contained fringes corresponding to anatase crystal lattice planes with d-spacing of 0.356 nm for the (101) plane [33], whereas the HRTEM image of TiO2-nit sample showed particles with lattice fringes for rutile crystal lattice plane (110) with d-spacing of 0.325 nm along with the anatase crystal lattice (101) plane.
Fig. 2

TEM and HRTEM images of the calcined TiO2 samples

Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy was also used to probe the phase formation in the synthesized TiO2 samples. Figure 3 shows Raman spectra obtained for the three TiO2 samples calcined at 500 °C. It is reported that anatase and rutile phases possessed six and five active Raman bands, respectively, (anatase 143, 195, 395, 512, and 638 cm−1; rutile 145, 445 , 611, and 826) [34]. It is clear from Fig. 3 that all three samples showed highly intense sharp Raman band (Eg) in the range of 141–146 cm−1, which is characteristic band due to the presence of anatase phase. Low intense Raman bands due to both anatase and rutile phases can be observed clearly in the inset figure. The TiO2-nit and TiO2-sul samples showed Raman bands due to both anatase and rutile phases; however, the intensity of Raman bands due to the presence of rutile phase is high in case of TiO2-nit sample. In contrast, TiO2-ace sample exhibited Raman bands due to anatase phase only.
Fig. 3

Raman spectra of the calcined TiO2 samples

It was reported that Raman spectroscopy results could be used to investigate the particle size of TiO2 nanoparticles, since an unusual band shifts of Raman bands could be correlated to decrease of particle size of the samples [35]. In Fig. 3, the TiO2-ace sample exhibited Eg band at 141.5 cm−1; however, the band was shifted to 146 and 150 cm−1 in case of TiO2-nit and TiO2-sul samples, respectively. The observations from Raman spectra indicate that TiO2-sul sample possessed small particle size than the other two samples, which is in accordance with XRD and TEM observations.

Diffuse-Reflectance UV-vis

The DR UV-vis spectra of the synthesized TiO2 samples thermally treated at 500 °C were shown in Fig. 4. The position of the peak maximum in the derivative of the DR UV-vis spectra for three samples was shown in the inset of the figure. It clearly shows that the samples have a strong electronic reflectance in the UV region. The reflectance peak maximum is different for the samples synthesized using three different acids. The TiO2-sul sample showed peak maximum at 372 nm, while it is shifted to 383 nm in TiO2-ace and 402 nm for TiO2-nit sample, respectively. It is reported that the anatase and rutile have band gap energy of 3.2 eV (380 nm) and 3.0 eV (415 nm), respectively [1]. The differences in reflectance maximum could be attributed to the change of crystallite size and phase structure of the samples [36]. The absorption maximum shifted toward higher wavelengths for the samples which have more percentage of rutile phase. The band gap energy (eV) was calculated for the calcined samples by determining the relation between hν and (αhν) [2] [Additional file 1: Figure S1]. The data revealed that the band gap energy for TiO2-sul (3.12 eV) is higher compared to TiO2-ace (2.99 eV) and TiO2-nit (2.97 eV). The band gap of TiO2 decreased when the rutile phase is dominated in the sample. It was reported that the valence band (VB) of anatase and rutile phases is majorly due to O2p states; on the other hand, the conduction band (CB) is composed of Ti 3d states [37]. The band gap energy of TiO2 is established by the CB and VB positions, which is majorly influenced by phase composition. So, the band gap energy of the sample which contained both anatase and rutile phases should be in between of the values of pure anatase and rutile.
Fig. 4

DR UV-vis spectra of the calcined TiO2 samples (inset; the derivative of the DR UV-vis spectra)

N2-Physisorption Measurements

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for the three synthesized samples are presented in Fig. 5a. Type-IV isotherms with H2-type hysteresis loop was observed for the samples synthesized by peptization with acetic acid (TiO2-ace) and sulfuric acid (TiO2-sul). This indicates that these two samples possess mesopores resulted from the aggregates of TiO2 nanoparticles. However, typical type-IV isotherm with narrow H3-type hysteresis loop (characteristic of open and/or slit-shaped pores) was observed for TiO2-nit sample. It can also be observed that the hysteresis loop was closed at high relative pressure (P/P0 = 1) and this observation indicating the presence of pores with large size [38].
Fig. 5

a N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. b Pore size distribution for the calcined TiO2 samples (reprinted with permission from [29]. Copyright @ 2017 Elsevier)

The BJH model pore size distributions for the synthesized materials were obtained from the values of adsorption branch of the isotherms. The BJH pore size distributions of the samples are shown in Fig. 5b. Narrow monomodal pore size distributions were observed for TiO2-ace and TiO2-sul samples. However, wider pore diameter distribution was observed for the sample prepared with nitric acid probably due to void spaces existed in between larger particles. Textural properties of the samples are presented in Table 1. Results showed that high surface area (115 m2 g−1) was observed for the TiO2-ace sample calcined at 500 °C. The order of SBET change was TiO2-ace > TiO2-sul > TiO2-nit. The observed results clearly indicate that the adapted peptization conditions were very effective in the generation of nanoparticles with porous texture.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

The photocatalytic activity of TiO2 depends upon crystallinity, crystallite size, composition, electron-hole recombination rate, surface area, and also the density of surface hydroxyl groups [39]. FTIR and XPS spectroscopic techniques were used to investigate the nature of –OH groups presented in the calcined TiO2 samples. Figure 6 shows FTIR spectra for the three TiO2 samples in the range of 1600–4000 cm−1. It is reported that TiO2 support could possess different types of surface hydroxyl groups; they can be categorized as isolated Ti-OH, hydroxyl groups bonded one to another via hydrogen bonding and chemically bonded H2O molecules [40].
Fig. 6

FTIR spectra of the calcined TiO2 samples

The three samples showed a broad band centered at 3408 cm−1, which is attributed to the stretching vibration of O-H groups (water molecules and the free surface –OH groups). Additional bands also appeared at 2340 and 1640 cm−1, which could be assigned to O-H stretching vibration and molecularly adsorbed H2O, respectively [41]. An existence of two –OH stretching vibrations in case of anatase (at 3715 and 3675 cm−1) and one weak band at 3680 cm−1 with rutile were reported previously [42]. A very similar result can be seen in case of synthesized TiO2 samples.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Figure 7 shows deconvoluted Ti2p and O1s XP spectra for synthesized TiO2 samples. The three samples showed two major peaks at 457.2 and 463.1 eV corresponding to 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 of Ti4+ in TiO2 [43]. Very similar binding energy values were observed in Ti 2p region for all the three TiO2 samples indicating that the Ti atoms in these samples existed in the same oxidation state. Two small shoulder peaks at 455.8 and 458.7 eV were also observed for all the samples. The shoulder at 455.8 eV could be assigned to a Ti3+ state, due to an oxygen deficiency in TiO2 [44], while the other shoulder peak at 458.7 eV arises from a Ti4+ state of the Ti-OH species [45]. It is clear from the Ti2p spectra that the contribution of oxygen-deficient TiO2 species is higher in TiO2-nit than TiO2-sul and TiO2-ace samples. All the samples showed O1s XP peaks at 528.4, 529.3, and 531.3 eV. The XPS peak at 528.4 eV can be attributed to O-Ti4+ species in the TiO2 crystal lattice, while other two peaks at 529.3 and 531.3 eV can be assigned to oxygen species presented in surface adsorbed hydroxyl groups [46].
Fig. 7

Ti 2p and O1s X-ray photoelectron spectra for the calcined TiO2 samples

McCafferty [47] also observed that the O1s peak possessed a tail peak at the high binding energy values, which could be due to the presence of Ti-OH groups. Since the physically adsorbed surface, Ti-OH groups can be easily removed under the ultra-high vacuum used to operate the XPS instrument [48]. These –OH groups presented in the samples must be due to Ti-OH which are chemically bonded to the surface defects of TiO2, where the percentages of –OH groups in total oxygen species for TiO2-nit sample are slightly higher than that of TiO2-sul and TiO2-ace (Table 2).
Table 2

Surface Elemental Composition of the Samples From XPS Analysis


Elemental Surface Composition (XPS)

Total Ti 2p Species

O 1 s (eV)

O-Ti4+ (528.4)

Ti-OH (529.3)

Ti-OH (531.3)




















Photocatalytic Degradation of Crystal Violet, Methylene Blue, and Para-nitro Phenol Dyes

The photocatalytic activity of calcined TiO2 nanoparticles for the degradation of CV, MB, and p-NP was estimated. It is reported that photocatalytic degradation reaction generally follows Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics [1]. Hence, the photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes can be expressed as
$$ -\mathrm{dc}/\mathrm{dt}=\mathrm{kC} $$
and after the integration, Eq. (4) can be derived
$$ C={C}_0{\exp}^{\left(-\mathrm{kt}\right)} $$
where C0 is the initial concentration (ppm) of the organic dyes, and k is the rate constant, which depends on reaction time, temperature, and solution pH. Normally, the photocatalytic efficiency of the catalyst increases with time on stream.

Blank experiments were performed to confirm the significance of both photocatalyst and UV irradiation. No reaction was proceeded when the catalyst and UV irradiation applied alone. Similar results were observed in our previous findings [49]. As notified in the experimental section, the TiO2 photocatalysts were equilibrated with the organic dye solution for 45 min to determine the adsorption of organic dyes on synthesized TiO2 samples. The UV-vis absorption spectra of CV, MB, and p-NP were recorded after the equilibration of the photocatalyst. Additional file 1: Figure S2, S3, and S4 displayed the variation in the UV-vis absorbance spectra of CV, MB, and p-NP solutions (10 ppm) with different reaction times over TiO2-ace, TiO2-sul, and TiO2-nit samples, respectively. The intensity of absorption peaks which corresponds to the CV, MB, and p-NP was decreased with the increase of reaction time. The UV-vis spectra of reaction products indicate that organic dyes were degraded during the photoreaction. The TiO2-nit sample found to be the most effective photocatalyst in comparison with TiO2-sul and TiO2-ace samples. Degradation of 50% of p-NP was observed within 60 min for the TiO2-nit sample, whereas 75 and 100 min were needed for the degradation of 50% p-NP for the TiO2-ace and TiO2-sul samples under similar conditions. Similar photocatalytic activity patterns were observed for degradation of MB and CV dyes.

The percentage degradation efficiency of the investigated catalysts was calculated using Eq. (4). Figure 8 shows the percentage changes of CV, MB, and p-NP aqueous solution at room temperature in the presence of calcined TiO2 samples. After just 10 min of the reaction, the TiO2-nit sample showed 29% CV degradation efficiency, while TiO2-ace and TiO2-sul samples showed only 17 and 9%, respectively. The photocatalytic activity steeply increased with the increase of reaction time over the three samples. However, after 120 min, TiO2-nit and TiO2-ace samples showed 99% efficiency; however, TiO2-sul sample showed only 65% efficiency.
Fig. 8

Photocatalytic degradation efficiency of TiO2 catalysts

To compare the photocatalytic performance of synthesized TiO2 samples, the degradation efficiency of the commercial P25 sample for organic dyes after 120 min is included in Fig. 8d. It is clear that TiO2-nit sample showed better performance than the P25 sample in the degradation of three organic dyes; however, TiO2-ace and TiO2-sul samples showed lower activity than the P25 catalyst in case of p-NP degradation. These results are suggesting that the performance of catalysts is influenced by the physicochemical characteristics of the TiO2 samples and nature of the organic dye.

The rate constants for photocatalytic degradation of CV, MB, and p-NP over synthesized TiO2 samples and commercial P25 sample were determined from the slope of the straight line which is plotted between ln(C0/Ct) and t, and the results are presented in Table 3. The observed results are indicating that the photocatalytic activity of the degradation of organic dyes was greatly influenced by the composition of TiO2 sample and amount of the surface hydroxyl groups. The activity indeed is not influenced by the particle size, crystallinity, and surface area of TiO2 synthesized in this work. This observation is not consistent with the results observed by Fujishima et al. [8] that the catalyst which possesses lower particle size offered high photocatalytic efficiency.
Table 3

Rate Constants for Photocatalytic Degradation of Different Organic Compounds Over TiO2 Samples


Rate constants (min−1)




















Previously, it was reported that anatase is a better photocatalyst than rutile due to its high band gap energy and a large number of surface OH groups [50]. It was thought that TiO2-nit sample would offer low photocatalytic activity due to the presence of more rutile phase (67%). However, Masahashi et al. [51] claimed that rutile exhibited higher performance than anatase MB degradation due to its superior crystalline nature.

Determination of photocurrent values was carried out to obtain a better insight responsible factor for the superior photocatalytic performance of the samples containing more rutile. It was reported that photocatalytic activity is directly related to the electron-hole separation efficiency of a catalyst which is influenced by the photocurrent density [52]. Theoretical photocurrent density of the TiO2 samples was calculated from the absorption edge of the TiO2 samples (obtained from DR UV-vis spectroscopy measurements) and theoretical equations (supporting information) presented in the literature [53]. The results of photocurrent of TiO2 samples are presented in Table 4 along with the percentage of rutile and photocatalytic efficiency values. The photocurrent density of TiO2-nit (0.545 mA/cm2) is higher than other two synthesized TiO2 samples and also commercial P25 sample (0.401 mA/cm2), manifesting the beneficial role of rutile phase in improving the photoactivity of TiO2 samples.
Table 4

Relation Between Rutile Percentage, Theoretical Photocurrent Density and Degradation Efficiency


aRutile (%)

bPhotocurrent Density (mA/cm2)

cDegradation efficiency (%)




























aSpurr and Myers method

bTheoretical photocurrent density calculations using DR UV-vis measurements

cReaction time = 120 min, 25 °C, pollutant concentration = 10 ppm

Previously, Melcher et al. [54] reported that photocatalytic capability of the commercial P25 material originates due to the presence of a mixture of rutile and anatase phases in the sample (75% anatase and 25% rutile). Hirakawa et al. [55] indicated that pure rutile itself is not a powerful photocatalyst, and it is also reported that the light with a wavelength of 380 nm is not powerful enough to generate charge carriers in the pure anatase [56]. Based on XPS spectroscopy results and theoretical calculations, Scanlon et al. [57] concluded that electrons were moved from rutile to anatase and the holes were transported from anatase to rutile, which inhibited the electron-hole recombination. Yu et al. [58] reported a similar observation that TiO2 sample with mixed phases was beneficial to decrease the rate of h+-e recombination and thus enhance the photocatalytic efficiency of the catalyst.

In literature reports, two possible transfer mechanisms have been proposed for anatase-rutile composite samples [59]. The first mechanism is the interfacial electron transfer from CB of anatase to that of the rutile [60], and the second one is an electron transfer from CB of rutile to lower energy anatase active sites [61]. It is known that the anatase CB possesses higher negative potential than the rutile CB due to the fact that anatase has a higher band gap (3.12 eV) than rutile. Therefore, it is not possible for an electron to move from the rutile CB to the anatase CB because it would have to overcome the energetic barrier between the two bands. The band gap of anatase VB is also slightly higher, than the rutile VB, so the generated holes could be moved to the anatase VB, to achieve an effective charge separation. Most probably, the electron-hole pair is formed in the composite of rutile and anatase in case of TiO2-nit and TiO2-sul samples (Fig. 9), and this rate is much higher in TiO2-nit sample due to predominant rutile formation.
Fig. 9

Plausible model of a generation of electron-hole pairs and b effective charge carrier separation via transfer of the generated holes into the anatase valence band

It was reported that increase of crystal growth of initial phase is possible by increasing the mobility of ions presented in precursor solution [62]. Several researchers added small volumes of mineral acids (such as hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid) to improve the mobility of dissociated ions [63]. Their role is not only to increase the rate of diffusion of ions in a solution but also to alter the surface charge. Under humidity conditions, titanium isopropoxide can subsequently undergo hydroxylation and polymerization to TiO2.
$$ \mathrm{Ti}{\left(\mathrm{OPri}\right)}_4+4{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to \mathrm{Ti}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_4+4\ \mathrm{PriOH}\kern2.5em \left(\mathrm{hydroxylation}\right) $$
$$ \mathrm{Ti}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_{4\kern0.5em }\to {\mathrm{TiO}}_{2.}x{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+\left(2\hbox{-} x\right)\ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\kern5em \left(\mathrm{condensation}\right) $$

Depending on the nature of peptizing acid, the transformation of TiO2 leads to anatase or rutile phase [64]. Formation of amorphous TiO2 or metastable anatase phase was observed when the condensation initiated before hydrolysis of Ti precursor. Under highly acidic conditions, the rutile phase formation is favorable as the rate of condensation is slow. Accordingly, the rutile phase was obtained when sulfuric and nitric acids were used for the peptization. The use of weak acid (acetic acid) as a peptizing agent allows the control of both the degree of condensation and oligomerization and persuades the preferential crystallization of TiO2 in the anatase phase. Zeng et al. [20] used polycarboxylic acid as a peptizing agent and observed the formation of nanoparticles of anatase which they attributed to chelation effect of organic acid.

It is known that TiO6 octahedra are a fundamental structural unit for both anatase and rutile phases (D4h system), and the only difference between these two structures is the assembly of the octahedral chains [65]. Face-shared linking of TiO6 units results in anatase structure, while edge-shared linking results in rutile structure [66]. It is clear that NO3− anions possessed weaker affinity to Ti atoms in an aqueous solution than CH3COO and SO42− anions. The strong affinity of CH3COO and SO42− anions with Ti atoms is responsible for the inhibition of the phase transformation.

In the previously reported studies, many of the photocatalysts have not been tested for reuse mainly due to undergo photocorrosion; hence, their photostability is reduced for further usage. The reusability of the calcined TiO2 samples was examined to study the effectiveness of these photocatalysts. It was observed that the used photocatalyst offered 90% efficiency for three consecutive cycles. The efficiency of the catalyst was reduced to 80 and 75% during fourth and fifth cycle, respectively. The decrease is due to the loss of some amount of catalyst during the filtration and regeneration procedures.


A simple peptization method was adapted to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles by using sulfuric, nitric, and acetic acid as peptizing agents and titanium isopropoxide as Ti precursor. The influence of acid species on the crystal phase, morphology, textural, and surface composition of TiO2 were studied in detail. The TiO2 sample peptized with acetic acid possessed pure anatase phase, while the formation of minor (5%) and major (67%) of rutile phase was observed in case of samples peptized with sulfuric acid and nitric acid, respectively. It is observed that TiO2 peptized with nitric acid showed sheet-like structures along with nanoparticles, while TiO2 samples peptized with sulfuric and acetic acids possessed near spherical nanoparticles. The photocatalytic properties of synthesized TiO2 nanostructures were evaluated for photodegradation of aqueous CV, MB, and p-NP solutions. The TiO2 peptized using nitric acid showed the best photocatalytic activity than commercial P25 and other two peptized samples, and its photodegradation efficiency was reached to 95% in 120 min for p-NP degradation. Although TiO2 samples peptized using sulfuric acid and acetic acid possessed smaller particle size, higher band gap energy, and high surface area, TiO2 sample peptized with nitric acid possessed a higher percentage of rutile and photocurrent density. The observed photocurrent density is dominated by the photoactivity of TiO2. The results indicate a direct correlation between the photocatalytic activity and the photocurrent density of the TiO2 samples. The superior activity of TiO2 sample peptized with nitric acid is due to the effective transfer of photogenerated electrons between rutile and anatase phases, and large pore diameter could have enhanced the diffusion and mass transportation of reacting molecules and OH radicals during the photochemical reaction. The synthesized TiO2 photocatalysts can be recycled with a minor change in the activity.



Crystal violet

DR UV-vis

Diffuse-reflectance ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy


Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy


High-resolution transmission electron microscopy


Methylene blue


Nuclear magnetic resonance


para–nitro phenol


Transmission electron microscopy


Titanium oxide


X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


X-ray powder diffraction



This research did not obtain any grant from funding agencies.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors have contributed to the final manuscript of the present investigation. HAM and KMSK have defined the research topic. HAM, KN, and TTA are involved in the preparation and characterization of the study and photocatalytic experiments. HAM, KN, and TTA wrote the manuscript. KMSK provided important suggestions on the draft of the manuscript. All authors examined and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
Chemistry Department, College of Science, University of Hail, Ha’il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


  1. Shen L, Bao N, Zheng Y et al (2008) Hydrothermal splitting of titanate fibers to single-crystalline TiO2 nanostructures with controllable crystalline phase, morphology, microstructure, and photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 112(24):8809–8818View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tsai C-C, Teng H (2006) Structural features of nanotubes synthesized from NaOH treatment on TiO2 with different post-treatments. Chem Mater 18(2):367–373View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Huang J-Q, Huang Z, Guo W et al (2008) Facile synthesis of titanate nanoflowers by a hydrothermal route. Cryst Growth Des 8(7):2444–2446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kolen’ko YV, Burukhin AA, Churagulov BR, Oleynikov NN (2003) Synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders from aqueous TiOSO4 solutions under hydrothermal conditions. Mater Lett 57(5–6):1124–1129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosono E, Fujihara S, Kakiuchi K, Imai H (2004) Growth of submicrometer-scale rectangular parallelepiped rutile TiO2 films in aqueous TiCl3 solutions under hydrothermal conditions. J Am Chem Soc 126(25):7790–7791View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim HW, Kim HS, Na HG, Yang JC, Kim DY (2010) Growth, structural, Raman, and photoluminescence properties of rutile TiO2 nanowires synthesized by the simple thermal treatment. J Alloys Compd 504(1):217–223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahmi A, Minot C, Silvi B, Causá M (1993) Theoretical analysis of the structures of titanium dioxide crystals. Phys Rev B 47(18):11717–11724View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA (2000) Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 1(1):1–21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung C-C, Chung T-W, Yang TCK (2008) Rapid synthesis of titania nanowires by microwave-assisted hydrothermal treatments. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(7):2301–2307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanie K, Sugimoto T (2004) Shape control of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles by amino acids in a gel–sol system. Chem Commun 14:1584–1585View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu N, Shi Z, Fan Y et al (1999) Effects of particle size of TiO2 on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in aqueous suspensions. Ind Eng Chem Res 38(2):373–379View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang C-C, Ying JY (1999) Sol−gel synthesis and hydrothermal processing of anatase and rutile titania nanocrystals. Chem Mater 11(11):3113–3120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Li S, Ye G, Chen G (2009) Low-temperature preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline anatase TiO2. J Phys Chem C 113(10):4031–4037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu W-Y, Chang Y-M, Ting J-M (2010) Room-temperature synthesis of single-crystalline anatase TiO2 nanowires. Cryst Growth Des 10(4):1646–1651View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Joo J, Kwon SG, Yu T et al (2005) Large-scale synthesis of TiO2 nanorods via nonhydrolytic sol−gel ester elimination reaction and their application to photocatalytic inactivation of E.coli. J Phys Chem B 109(32):15297–15302View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shibata H, Ogura T, Mukai T et al (2005) Direct synthesis of mesoporous titania particles having a crystalline wall. J Am Chem Soc 127(47):16396–16397View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lencka MM, Riman RE (1995) Thermodynamics of the hydrothermal synthesis of calcium titanate with reference to other alkaline-earth titanates. Chem Mater 7(1):18–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Yang Y, Guo M, Zhang M (2015) Influence of acid type and concentration on the synthesis of nanostructured titanium dioxide photocatalysts from titanium-bearing electric arc furnace molten slag. RSC Adv 5(18):13478–13487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW (1990) CHAPTER 4—particulate sols and gels. Sol-gel science. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 234–301View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Zeng T, Qiu Y, Chen L, Song X (1998) Microstructure and phase evolution of TiO2 precursors prepared by peptization-hydrolysis method using polycarboxylic acid as peptizing agent. Mater Chem Phys 56(2):163–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nam WS, Han GY (2003) A photocatalytic performance of TiO2 photocatalyst prepared by the hydrothermal method. Korean J Chem Eng 20(1):180–184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zaban A, Aruna ST, Tirosh S, Gregg BA, Mastai Y (2000) The effect of the preparation condition of TiO2 colloids on their surface structures. J Phys Chem B 104(17):4130–4133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu T-X, Li F-B, Li X-Z (2008) Effects of peptizing conditions on nanometer properties and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 hydrosols prepared by H2TiO3. J Hazard Mater 155(1–2):90–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kanna M, Wongnawa S (2008) Mixed amorphous and nanocrystalline TiO2 powders prepared by sol–gel method: characterization and photocatalytic study. Mater Chem Phys 110(1):166–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Alphonse P, Varghese A, Tendero C (2010) Stable hydrosols for TiO2 coatings. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 56(3):250–263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Parra R, Góes MS, Castro MS et al (2008) Reaction pathway to the synthesis of anatase via the chemical modification of titanium isopropoxide with acetic acid. Chem Mater 20(1):143–150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhou J, Song B, Zhao G, Han G (2012) Effects of acid on the microstructures and properties of three-dimensional TiO2 hierarchical structures by solvothermal method. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tobaldi DM, Pullar RC, Binions R et al (2014) Influence of sol counter-ions on the visible light induced photocatalytic behaviour of TiO2 nanoparticles. Catal Sci Technol 4(7):2134–2146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Khalil KMS, El-Khatib RM, Ali TT, Mahmoud HA, Elsamahy AA (2013) Titania nanoparticles by acidic peptization of xerogel formed by hydrolysis of titanium(IV) isopropoxide under atmospheric humidity conditions. Powder Technol 245:156–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Spurr RA, Myers H (1957) Quantitative analysis of anatase-rutile mixtures with an X-ray diffractometer. Anal Chem 29(5):760–762View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Vinogradov AV, Vinogradov VV (2013) Effect of acidic peptization on formation of highly photoactive TiO2 films prepared without heat treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 97(1):290–294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Montoya JA, del Angel P, Viveros T (2001) The effect of temperature on the structural and textural evolution of sol–gel Al2O3–TiO2 mixed oxides. J Mater Chem 11(3):944–950View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang Q, Gao L, Guo J (2000) Effect of hydrolysis conditions on morphology and crystallization of nanosized TiO2 powder. J Eur Ceram Soc 20(12):2153–2158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bersani D, Antonioli G, Lottici PP, Lopez T (1998) Raman study of nanosized titania prepared by sol–gel route. J Non-Cryst Solids 232-234:175–181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Alexandrescu R, Dumitrache F, Morjan I et al (2004) TiO2 nanosized powders by TiCl4 laser pyrolysis. Nanotechnology 15(5):537–545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiao Q, Ouyang L (2009) Photocatalytic activity and hydroxyl radical formation of carbon-doped TiO2 nanocrystalline: effect of calcination temperature. Chem Eng J 148(2–3):248–253View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Dai S, Wu Y, Sakai T et al (2010) Preparation of highly crystalline TiO2 nanostructures by acid-assisted hydrothermal treatment of hexagonal-structured nanocrystalline titania/cetyltrimethyammonium bromide nanoskeleton. Nanoscale Res Lett 5(11):1829–1835View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai C-C, Teng H (2004) Regulation of the physical characteristics of titania nanotube aggregates synthesized from hydrothermal treatment. Chem Mater 16(22):4352–4358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Klosek S, Raftery D (2001) Visible light driven V-doped TiO2 photocatalyst and its photooxidation of ethanol. J Phys Chem B 105(14):2815–2819View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Connor PA, Dobson KD, McQuillan AJ (1999) Infrared spectroscopy of the TiO2/aqueous solution interface. Langmuir 15(7):2402–2408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zeleňák V, Hornebecq V, Mornet S, Schäf O, Llewellyn P (2006) Mesoporous silica modified with titania: structure and thermal stability. Chem Mater 18(14):3184–3191View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Primet M, Pichat P, Mathieu MV (1971) Infrared study of the surface of titanium dioxides. I. Hydroxyl groups. J Phys Chem 75(9):1216–1220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner CD, Muilenberg GE (1979) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard data for use in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corp, Eden Prairie, MinnGoogle Scholar
  44. Grosvenor AP, Kobe BA, Biesinger MC, McIntyre NS (2004) Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf Interface Anal 36(12):1564–1574View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenlief CM, White JM, Ko CS, Gorte RJ (1985) An XPS investigation of titanium dioxide thin films on polycrystalline platinum. J Phys Chem 89(23):5025–5028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Iwabuchi A, Choo C-K, Tanaka K (2004) Titania nanoparticles prepared with pulsed laser ablation of rutile single crystals in water. J Phys Chem B 108(30):10863–10871View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. McCafferty E, Wightman JP (1998) Determination of the concentration of surface hydroxyl groups on metal oxide films by a quantitative XPS method. Surf Interface Anal 26(8):549–564View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang R, Sakai N, Fujishima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K (1999) Studies of surface wettability conversion on TiO2 single-crystal surfaces. J Phys Chem B 103(12):2188–2194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Ali TT, Narasimharao K, Parkin IP et al (2015) Effect of pretreatment temperature on the photocatalytic activity of microwave irradiated porous nanocrystalline ZnO. New J Chem 39(1):321–332View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tong H, Ouyang S, Bi Y et al (2011) Nano-photocatalytic materials: possibilities and challenges. Adv Mater 24(2):229–251View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Masahashi N, Mizukoshi Y, Semboshi S, Ohtsu N (2009) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of rutile TiO2 prepared by anodic oxidation in a high concentration sulfuric acid electrolyte. Appl Catal, B 90(1–2):255–261View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Ren J, Wang W, Shang M, Sun S, Gao E (2011) Heterostructured bismuth molybdate composite: preparation and improved photocatalytic activity under visible-light irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(7):2529–2533View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ma Y, Pendlebury SR, Reynal A, Le Formal F, Durrant JR (2014) Dynamics of photogenerated holes in undoped BiVO4 photoanodes for solar water oxidation. Chem Sci 5(8):2964–2973View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Melcher J, Feroz S, Bahnemann D (2017) Comparing photocatalytic activities of commercially available iron-doped and iron-undoped aeroxide TiO2 P25 powders. J Mater Sci 52(11):6341–6348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hirakawa T, Yawata K, Nosaka Y (2007) Photocatalytic reactivity for O2 and OH radical formation in anatase and rutile TiO2 suspension as the effect of H2O2 addition. Appl Catal, A 325(1):105–111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Grätzel M, Rotzinger FP (1985) The influence of the crystal lattice structure on the conduction band energy of oxides of titanium(IV). Chem Phys Lett 118(5):474–477View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Scanlon DO, Dunnill CW, Buckeridge J et al (2013) Band alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2. Nat Mater 12(9):798–801View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Yu J, Wang G (2008) Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous titania hollow microspheres. J Phys Chem Solids 69(5–6):1147–1151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kawahara T, Konishi Y, Tada H et al (2002) A patterned TiO2(Anatase)/TiO2(Rutile) bilayer-type photocatalyst: effect of the anatase/rutile junction on the photocatalytic activity. Angew Chem Int Ed 41(15):2811–2813View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhao H, Liu L, Andino JM, Li Y (2013) Bicrystalline TiO2 with controllable anatase–brookite phase content for enhanced CO2 photoreduction to fuels. J Mater Chem A 1(28):8209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang S, Lian JS, Zheng WT, Jiang Q (2012) Photocatalytic property of Fe doped anatase and rutile TiO2 nanocrystal particles prepared by sol–gel technique. Appl Surf Sci 263:260–265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Li C-S, Li Y-N, Wu Y-L, Ong B-S, Loutfy R-O (2009) Fabrication conditions for solution-processed high-mobility ZnO thin-film transistors. J Mater Chem 19(11):1626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Franck EU, Hartmann D, Hensel F (1965) Proton mobility in water at high temperatures and pressures. Discussions of the Faraday Society 39:200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Shin H, Jung HS, Hong KS, Lee J-K (2004) Crystallization process of TiO2 nanoparticles in an acidic solution. Chem Lett 33(10):1382–1383View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Li Y, Liu J, Jia Z (2006) Morphological control and photodegradation behavior of rutile TiO2 prepared by a low-temperature process. Mater Lett 60(13–14):1753–1757View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Yanagisawa K, Ovenstone J (1999) Crystallization of anatase from amorphous titania using the hydrothermal technique: effects of starting material and temperature. J Phys Chem B 103(37):7781–7787View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018