Open Access

Facile One-Step Sonochemical Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of Graphene/Ag3PO4 Quantum Dots Composites

  • Abulajiang Reheman1,
  • Yalkunjan Tursun1,
  • Talifu Dilinuer1,
  • Maimaiti Halidan1,
  • Kuerbangnisha Kadeer1 and
  • Abulikemu Abulizi1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters201813:70

Received: 27 November 2017

Accepted: 30 January 2018

Published: 2 March 2018


In this study, a novel graphene/Ag3PO4 quantum dot (rGO/Ag3PO4 QD) composite was successfully synthesized via a facile one-step photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction method for the first time. The composites were analyzed by various techniques. According to the obtained results, Ag3PO4 QDs with a size of 1–4 nm were uniformly dispersed on rGO nanosheets to form rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites. The photocatalytic activity of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites was evaluated by the decomposition of methylene blue (MB). Meanwhile, effects of the surfactant dosage and the amount of rGO on the photocatalytic activity were also investigated. It was found that rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs (WrGO:Wcomposite = 2.3%) composite exhibited better photocatalytic activity and stability with degrading 97.5% of MB within 5 min. The improved photocatalytic activities and stabilities were majorly related to the synergistic effect between Ag3PO4 QDs and rGO with high specific surface area, which gave rise to efficient interfacial transfer of photogenerated electrons and holes on both materials. Moreover, possible formation and photocatalytic mechanisms of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs were proposed. The obtained rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs photocatalysts would have great potentials in sewage treatment and water splitting.


rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs compositeSonochemical methodPhotocatalytic stabilityMethylene blue


Recently, synthesis of photocatalysts with high efficiency has captured the attention of the researchers because of their potential applications in the removal of organic pollutants and hydrogen production [13]. Because of high activation and efficient separation of photoexcited electrons(e) and holes(h+) [4], Ag3PO4 semiconductor photocatalysts received extensive attention of researchers in the field of photocatalysis. Unfortunately, there are several factors which influence the photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4, such as irregular morphology, poor solubility, unstability, high cost, etc., which hindered its widespread applications [5]. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the photoactivity and photostability of Ag3PO4.

Previous researches have proved that the photocatalytic performance could be significantly improved by the efficient separation of photogenerated e-h+ pairs [68]. According to the equation τ = r22D, where τ represents the average diffusion time of the photogenerated carriers, r stands for the particle radius, and D refers to the carrier diffusion coefficiency [9], reduced particle size may benefit for the efficient suppression of charge carrier recombination, thus improving the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts. It can be deduced from this viewpoint that the presence of quantum dots (QDs) could enhance the photocatalytic activity [10, 11]. Because surfactant coverage can hinder the mutual contact between QD surface and pollutants, QDs are seldom reported to be applied as high-efficient photocatalyst independently. In order to supplement this defect, QDs were usually loaded on a carrier with large surface area to decrease the aggregation in the absence of any stabilizer, which endows QDs with the enhanced photocatalytic activity.

Due to better electron separation and transfer in heterostructures, rGO was chosen to be the supporter for the Ag3PO4 QDs. rGO has a two-dimensional (2D) carbon structure with outstanding electronic, mechanical, and thermal properties [12], high specific surface area, and high carrier mobility [1316].These properties make it a good substrate for Ag3PO4 photocatalyst, because it could effectively promote the e-h+ pair separation and faciliate the charge transfer between the heterojunctions to improve photocatalytic activity and stability. Furthermore, rGO could be produced by a chemical oxidation and reduction procedure [17]. The methods of graphene oxide (GO) into rGO include chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reduction [18, 19], chemical reduction [20], and hydrothermal reduction [21, 22]. However, the above methods have some intrinsic drawbacks such as complex procedure and secondary pollution. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a green way to produce rGO. Recently, the new green ways of photo-assisted [23, 24] and ultrasonic-assisted [25] reduction method were reported.

Photoreduction of GO to produce rGO is a mild and green method; besides, photochemical and photothermal reduction mechanisms may take place individually or coinstantaneously in the processes [2628]. Furthermore, the self-photoreduction of GO to rGO can enhance the presence of hole scavenger in the solution [24]. Ultrasound has been widely used for the material synthesis and wastewater treatment [29, 30].Ultrasonic irradiation can offer localized hot spots with pressure about 20 MPa, temperatures about 5000 K, and high cooling rate about 1010 Ks − 1, which are generated by acoustic cavitation [31]. Upon the ultrasonic irradiation, a variety of physical and chemical effects can be produced in the liquids by acoustic cavitation, and a unique chemical reactions environment can be provided under these extreme conditions [31, 32].However, to the best of our knowledge, the synthesis of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites using a photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction method has not been reported yet.

Herein, we report the design and development of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites with high-efficient photocatalytic performance, wherein the Ag3PO4 QDs with a size of 1–4 nm were loaded uniformly on rGO nanosheets via a facile one-step photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction method for the first time. The composites were analyzed by various techniques. The photocatalytic activity and stability of the obtained composites were evaluated by the degradation of methyl orange (MO), Rhodamine B (RhB), and methylene blue (MB) under visible light irradiation. Meanwhile, the surfactant dosage and the amount of rGO on the photocatalytic performance were also discussed. The possible photocatalytic mechanism of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs was analyzed based on the free radicals trapping experiments. This paper will provide a facile and green method for the fabrication of multiple metal oxide QDs and efficient functional materials with broader application in the field of environmental purification.

Experimental Section

Synthesis of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs

GO was prepared from natural graphite based on Hummers method [33]. In a typical synthesis process, 20 mg of GO was added in 50 mL of water and sonicated for 30 min to form a uniform suspension, and then 2.2 mmol sodium oleate was added into the above solution and sonicated for 60 min. After that, 10 mL AgNO3 aqueous solution(0.6 mol/L)was added, the obtained solution was stirred for 4 h to complete ion exchange, and then 10 mL Na2HPO4 aqueous solution (0.2 mol/L) was added drop by drop to the solution under ultrasonic irradiation. After 60 min, the precipitate was centrifuged (5000 rpm) for 5 min and washed several times with hexyl alcohol and absolute ethanol to obtain GO/Ag3PO4 QD composites. Hereafter, 0.3 g of GO/Ag3PO4QDs was dissolved in 100 mL absolute ethanol, and the mixture was exposed to visible light irradiation (CEL-S500, 300 W Xe lamp, 420 nm cutoff filter) and ultrasonic irradiation for 60 min. The ultrasonic irradiation was performed with a high-intensity ultrasonic probe (Xinzhi Co., China, JY92-2D, 10 mm diameter, Ti-horn, 20 kHz) which was placed in the reaction system. The precipitate was centrifuged (5000 rpm) for 5 min and then dried at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites. Ag3PO4 QDs were prepared under the same condition without GO. To investigate the optimal rGO loading amount, a series of samples with theoretical weight ratios of rGO to rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites (WrGO:Wcomposite = 1.5, 2.0, 2.3, 2.5 and 3.0 wt%) were obtained. The corresponding rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites were marked as R-1.5, R-2, R-2.3, R-2.5, and R-3.

Materials Characterization

Ag3PO4 QDs and rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu-Ka, k = 1.5418 Å) in 2θ range from 10° to 80°, FT-IR spectroscopy, TEM (JEOL JEM-2010), Raman spectra system (Horiba JY-T64000, France), XPS (PHI Quantera SXM) spectrometer, and UV-vis spectrophotometer (U-3010, Hitachi, Japan). Photoluminescence spectra were obtained by FL (F-4500, Hitachi, Japan) spectrophotometer.

Photocatalytic Activity Measurement

To measure the photocatalytic properties of the composites, 10 mg of the prepared samples was added to 100 mL of 10 ppm MB. The mixture was magnetically stirred for 30 min under the dark to ensure absorption–desorption equilibrium. A filter (λ ≥ 420 nm) was placed on the beaker and then was irradiated with a 300 W xenon light source(CEL-S500, China). In the beginning, the samples were collected in every 1 minute, until 6 min, and then the samples were taken out in every 2 min. A UV-vis spectrophotometer was used to analyze the absorbance properties of the collected solution. The photocatalysts were removed by centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 3 min) before UV-vis measurements.

Detection of active species

The trapping experiment was conducted in a similar way with the photocatalytic degradation experiment. Three different scavengers including (concentration was about 1 mM) isopropanol (IPA, OH· scavenger), disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA, hole scavenger), and p-benzoquinone (BQ, O2· scavenger) were used, respectively, to investigate the main active species generated in the photodegradation process.

Results and Discussion

Materials Characterization

Figure 1 exhibited the XRD patterns of GO, rGO, Ag3PO4 QDs, and R-2.3. The XRD results of GO and rGO revealed a characteristic reflection peak at 2θ = 10.7° and 25°, respectively (corresponding to a d-spacing of 0.83, 0.36 nm) (Fig. 1a, b) [34]. All the XRD peaks of Ag3PO4 can be indexed to the body-centered cubic phase of (JCPDS No.06-0505) (Fig. 1d). The R-2.3 exhibited a similar XRD pattern with pure Ag3PO4 QDs, and the broader diffraction peaks were attributed to the small size of Ag3PO4 QDs, which was calculated to be about 3.7 nm according to the Scherrer equation [35]. No diffraction peaks assigned to GO and rGO could be observed in the composites (Fig. 1c), which was attributed to the small rGO amount in the composite [36]. To investigate the effect of GO on the formation of Ag3PO4 QDs, the XRD pattern of pure Ag3PO4 QDs was measured. The diffraction peaks of pure Ag3PO4 QDs could be indexed to cubic Ag3PO4. The average size of pure Ag3PO4 QDs was calculated to be about 5.1 nm with the Scherrer equation, which was larger than that of rGO/Ag3PO4 composites. Above results indicated that GO sheets could affect the formation of Ag3PO4 QDs.
Fig. 1

XRD patterns of a GO, b rGO, c R-2.3, and d Ag3PO4 QDs

Figure 2 shows the TEM images of R-2.3 composites. Ag3PO4 QDs which a relatively narrow size distribution with a diameter of 2.81 ± 1.2 nm were dispersed uniformly on rGO sheet. The lattice spacing was 0.212 and 0.190 nm, which corresponded to the d-spacing of (220) and (310) crystallographic plane of Ag3PO4, respectively. To investigate the effects of ultrasonic, conventional stirring was performed instead of ultrasonic treatment. The results were shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. Ag3PO4 particles on rGO which was formed by conventional stirring method did not show uniform structure, and the size of Ag3PO4 became larger than that formed by ultrasonic treatment. The above results indicated that ultrasonic treatment was very effective in dispersing and controlling size of Ag3PO4 particles on rGO layers [37].
Fig. 2

TEM images of R-2.3 (a, c), HRTEM image of R-2.3 (b), and particle size distribution (d)

The successful ultrasonic-assisted photo-reduction of GO to rGO can be further confirmed by XPS spectra of GO and R-2.3 composites as shown in Fig. 3. The peaks located at 131.7, 284.2, 367.2, and 530.2 eV were indexed to the characteristic peaks of P2p, C1s, Ag3d, and O1s, respectively (Fig. 3a). The strong peaks at 366.8 and 372.8 eV are attributed to Ag+ of Ag3PO4 [38] (Fig. 3b). The O1s XPS spectra of R-2.3 can be divided into two peaks, which were attributed to O1s from Ag3PO4 (529.5 eV) and O1s from rGO (531.3 eV) [7, 39]. The peak of O1s from rGO (531.3 eV) shifted to lower binding energy compared with that of GO (531.8 eV), implying that there existed a chemical interaction between rGO and Ag3PO4 QDs by C=O bond. The C1s spectrum of GO was divided into three different peaks at 284.8, 286.7, and 287.7 eV, which were assigned to C-C/C=C, C-O, and C=O, respectively [40, 41] (Fig. 3c). After being reduced by visible light assisted with ultrasonic irradiation (Fig. 3d), the oxygen-containing groups, especially C-O, C=O showed remarkably decreased peak intensities, indicating that the reduction from GO to rGO proceeded successfully.
Fig. 3

XPS of a survey spectrum, b Ag3d, c O1s, and d C1s of GO and R-2.3

Figure 4a demonstrated the FTIR spectra of GO, rGO, Ag3PO4 QDs, and R-2.3. The characteristic peaks at 1725.6, 1056.5, and 1615.4 cm− 1 in GO were attributed to the stretching vibrations of carboxyl C=O, alkoxy C-O, and C=C [40, 42], respectively. The broad peak at 3000–3600 cm− 1 was ascribed to the O-H stretching vibration [43]. Ag3PO4 QDs and R-2.3 composites had similar FT-IR peaks at 552.1 and 970.2 cm− 1, which were assigned to vibrations of P-O from PO43− [44]. This indicated that Ag3PO4 QDs were bonded on rGO sheets. After photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction to rGO, the characteristic peaks (at 1725.6, 1056.5 cm− 1) shifted to lower wavenumbers compared to GO, which was consistent with the results of XPS analysis, indicating the existence of charge interaction between rGO and Ag3PO4 in the as-prepared composites.
Fig. 4

FT-IR spectra (a) and Raman spectra (b) of GO, rGO, Ag3PO4 QDs, and R-2.3

Figure 4b showed the Raman spectra of GO, rGO, Ag3PO4 QDs, and R-2.3. The Raman spectrum of GO showed two characteristic peaks of the D band at 1347 cm− 1 and G band at 1586 cm− 1. The value of ID/IG in R-2.3 and in GO was about 1.039 and 0.9056, respectively. It was obvious that the composite showed relatively high intensity of the D band compared with GO, which confirmed that the GO sheets were partially reduced into rGO [37]. The Raman spectra of Ag3PO4 QDs and R-2.3 showed three distinct peaks at 410, 566, and 714 cm− 1, and these peaks were accredited to the P-O-P bonds. The strong peak at 907 cm− 1 was raised from the motion of terminal oxygen bond vibration in phosphate chains [23].

Preparation mechanism of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs

The synthesis route of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composite was proposed and schematically illustrated in Fig. 5. The synthesis reactions were detailed as follows:
$$ {\mathrm{Ag}}^{+}+\mathrm{oleate}\ \mathrm{ions}\to \mathrm{Ag}\hbox{-} \mathrm{oleate} $$
$$ \mathrm{Ag}\hbox{-} \mathrm{oleate}+\mathrm{GO}\to \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} \mathrm{Ag}\hbox{-} \mathrm{oleate} $$
$$ \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} \mathrm{Ag}\hbox{-} \mathrm{oleate}+{{\mathrm{PO}}_4}^{3\hbox{-}}\to \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs} $$
$$ \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4+\mathrm{h}\upsilon \to \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs}\left({\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-} }+{\mathrm{h}}^{+}\right) $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to \cdotp \mathrm{OH}+\cdotp \mathrm{H} $$
$$ \cdotp \mathrm{OH}+\cdotp \mathrm{OH}\to {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2 $$
$$ \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs}+{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\to \mathrm{rGO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs} $$
$$ \mathrm{GO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs}+\cdotp \mathrm{H}\to \mathrm{rGO}\hbox{-} {\mathrm{Ag}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4\mathrm{QDs} $$
Fig. 5

Illustration of the synthesis of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites via photo-ultrasonic-assisted method

The total synthesis route could be fallen into four successive stages. Firstly, Ag+ and oleate ions interacted electrostatically to form Ag-oleate complexes, hydrolysis of Ag+ ions could be prevented effectively by this process. Ag-oleate complexes interacted with the excess of oleate ions improving its hydrophilic property in order to disperse in water. Oxygen groups on the surface of GO provided hydrophilic property. When GO sheets were added to the Ag- oleate aqueous solution, the Ag-oleate complexes will preferentially adsorb on these oxygen containing functional groups (Eq. (1)). Secondly, reactions between Ag+ and PO43− proceeded to form Ag3PO4 QDs on GO surface (Eq. (2)). Thirdly, when GO-Ag3PO4 QDs were sonicated in solution, the ultrasonic stimulated electron–hole pairs from Ag3PO4 QDs when GO-Ag3PO4QDs was irradiated with visible-light in ethanol solution. At the same time, ·H and H2O2 were produced by ultrasonic irradiation. Ultimately, GO was reduced into rGO by ·H and accepted photo-generated electrons from the conduction band (CB) of Ag3PO4. As a result, rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composite was obtained by photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction.

Optical properties of photocatalysis

The UV-vis absorption spectra of Ag3PO4 QDs and rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs with different mass ratio of rGO were shown in Fig. 6a. The absorbance wavelength of pure Ag3PO4 QDs was shorter than 530 nm; inversely, rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites structure showed an extended wavelength (> 530 nm) and its intensity increased with increasing rGO contents before which reached 2.3%, and decreased after. This can be attributed to that the presence of carbon in rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs reduces the reflection of light [45]. According to the Kubelka–Munk function [46], we can get the band gaps of the photocatalysts as shown in Fig. 6b and Additional file 1: Figure S2; the band gap of R-2.3 was calculated to be 1.62 eV, which was lower than pure Ag3PO4 QDs (2.23 eV). The relative narrow band gap energy may be attributed to the synergetic effect that sum of the total effect is superior to the single effect after different types of dispersion to interact between rGO and Ag3PO4 QDs [47], which lead to improve the solar spectrum utilization efficiency of the photocatalysts [36].
Fig. 6

a UV-vis DRS spectra of Ag3PO4 QDs, R-1.5, R-2, R-2.3, R-2.5, R-3 composites, and b the plots of (αhν)2 versus Eg

Photocatalytic activity and stability

To understand the influencing factors on the experimental process to the photocatalytic activity, the effects of different mass of surfactant were investigated as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3. Samples were prepared when other conditions remained constant. The result showed that the photocatalytic activities increased with increasing the mass of surfactant but decreased after more than 0.5 g, as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3, which may be ascribed to the excessive oleate ions that limited Ag3PO4 QDs size distribution on rGO surface [35]. This leads to the decrease of photocatalytic activities. Compared with pure Ag3PO4 QDs, the concentration of MB decreased rapidly for rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites (Fig. 7a). This result indicated that the photocatalytic reaction was related to the existence of active sites [48, 49]. When the content of rGO was 2.3%, the highest photocatalytic activity was emerged and could degrade MB by 97.46% for 5 min. This can be attributed to rGO-semiconductor heterojunction, which had effectively availed the transfer of charge from rGO nanosheets under visible light irradiation [23]. Under the same conditions, when increasing the content of rGO to 3%, the results had proved fact that excessive loading of rGO could reduce the dye and photon absorption on Ag3PO4 [23]. Importantly, rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites displayed superior photocatalytic performance than pure Ag3PO4 QDs and rGO-based Ag3PO4 composites [23, 50]. The photoexited electrons(e) could transfer from the CB of Ag3PO4 QDs to rGO, and rGO in the composites could act as a highway for electron transfer to suppress the e-h+ recombination, which accounted for the remarkably improved photo-conversion efficiency [51]. Moreover, interfacial charge transfer could be faciliated due to the larger superfacial area of rGO [52, 53]. On top of that, the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of R-2.3 composite over different organic dyes was investigated as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S4.
Fig. 7

a Photocatalytic degradation of MB by Ag3PO4 QDs, R-1.5, R-2, R-2.3, R-2.5, and R-3 composites, b corresponding rate constants (k) of samples for photocatalytic degradation of MB, c recycling experiments of the R-2.3 for degradation of MB, and d XRD patterns before and after the recycling experiments

To test the stability of the R-2.3 composite, the cycling experiments of the composite for MB were performed (Fig. 7c). The results revealed that R-2.3 composites exemplified higher photocatalytic stability after five cycles, with maintaining its degradation efficiency up to 90%, indicating the good photocayalytic stability. And this may be benefited from the efficient photo-generated e-h+ separation. Moreover, the XRD pattern of R-2.3, which was used for five cycles is shown in Fig. 7d, and no obvious peak about Ag is observed this may be attributed to that rGO could facilitate the electron transfer to Ag3PO4 QDs and decreased the photocorrosion of Ag3PO4 QDs [23].

Mechanism of the enhanced photocatalytic performance

The aforementioned experimental results indicated that the photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4 was enhanced by combining Ag3PO4 with rGO sheets, which was ascribed to the fast transfer and separation of photo-generated e-h+ pairs in the composites [23]. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were performed to investigate the e-h+ pairs migration, transfer, and recombination processes in semiconductors [54, 55]. Figure 8a showed the PL spectra of the samples. The PL spectra of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs showed a lower recombination rate of photogenerated e-h+ pairs compared to Ag3PO4 QDs, indicating that more photogenerated e and h+ can participate in the reduction and oxidation reaction; this could lead to decline of the recombination of photogenerated e-h+ pairs in Ag3PO4 in the composites. Therefore, rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composite displayed superior photocatalytic activity than that of Ag3PO4 QDs.
Fig. 8

a Photoluminescence spectra of Ag3PO4 QDs, R-1.5, R-2, R-2.3, R-2.5, and R-3 and b the effect of different quenchers on the photocatalytic degradation of MB

To further confirm the main active species in the photocatalysis process over rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs, MB was used as a pollutant. The results are shown in Fig. 8b. Herein, after the addition of isopropanol (as hydroxyl radical scavenger) [56], the catalytic activity of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs was not obviously affected; when EDTA (as hole capture) [57] was added, the photocatalytic degradation of MB was greatly inhibited. However, when p-benzoquinone (BQ, O2· scavenger) was added, the deactivation of rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs was unneglectable. The above results illustrated that holes and O2· radicals were the main active species in the photocatalysis process.

The mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes by rGO/Ag3PO4 QDs is shown in Fig. 9. Upon the visible light exposure, Ag3PO4 QDs was photoexcited, and electrons were excited from valence band to conduction band; after that the electrons could transfer to rGO due to effect of the electric field, and then electrons retransferred to the surface of rGO to participate in the photocatalytic reaction. rGO could efficiently separate e-h+ pairs, thus availed the transfer of the electrons [23] and led to the promoted photocatalytic activity of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites.
Fig. 9

The mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes on the surface of rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites


A novel rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composite was prepared via a facile photo-ultrasonic-assisted reduction method. The obtained rGO/Ag3PO4 QD composites exhibited better photocatalytic activity under visible light and higher than pure Ag3PO4 QDs alone. This was due to the efficient e-h+ pairs separation and fast electron transfer in these heterojunctions. The rGO sheets effectively promoted the separation of e and h+ and fast transfer of electrons in the heterostructure photocatalysts. Free radicals trapping experiments indicated that h+ played important roles in the photocatalytic degradation of dyes. It was clear that ultrasonic-assisted method was a facile and economical way to prepare visible-light-responsive and high efficient Ag3PO4 QDs-based composites.







Conduction band


Chemical vapor deposition


Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate


Graphene oxide




Methylene blue


Methyl orange


Quantum dots

R-1.5, R-2, R-2.3, R-2.5, and R-3: 

Content of rGO in composites 1.5, 2.0, 2.3, 2.5, and 3.0 wt%




Rhodamine B


Weight of composites


Weight of grapheme



This work was supported by the Dr. Startup funds of Xinjiang University (BS150223) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21465022).

Availability of data and materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Authors’ contributions

AR has carried out the interpretation of all the data such as the XRD, XPS, Raman patterns, TEM images, and photocatalic degradation experiment. He also proposed the photocatalytic mechanism. YT, TD, and MH have contributed in observing the morphology and crystal structure of rGO-Ag3PO4 composite and studied on the formation mechanism. KK has contributed in testing the data of PL, UV-vis, and grammar correcting of all text. AA designed the research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

We confirm that none of the authors have competing interests in the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion & Chemical Engineering Process (Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region), College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, People’s Republic of China


  1. Tseng CM, Chen HL, Lai SN et al (2017) Investigation of free-standing plasmonic mesoporous ag/CMK-8-Nafion composite membrane for the removal of organic pollutants with 254-nm UV irradiation. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang X, Huang H, Li G et al (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis of 3D hollow porous Fe3O4 microspheres towards catalytic removal of organic pollutants. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:648View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Navalón S, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Álvaro M, Garcia H (2013) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction using non-titanium metal oxides and sulfides. ChemSusChem 6:562–577View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yi Z, Ye J, Kikugawa N, Kako T et al (2010) An orthophosphate semiconductor with photooxidation properties under visible-light irradiation. Nat Mater 9:559–564View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang H, Bai Y, Yang J et al (2012) A facile way to rejuvenate Ag3PO4 as a recyclable highly efficient photocatalyst. Chem-Eur J 18:5524–5529View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang L, Chai Y, Ren J et al (2015) Ag3PO4 nanoparticles loaded on 3D flower-like spherical MoS2: a highly efficient hierarchical heterojunction photocatalyst. Dalton T 44:14625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li F, Li Z, Zhang M et al (2017) Ag3PO4@holmium phosphate core@shell composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 7:34705–34713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang X, Cai H, Bao M et al (2018) Insight into the highly efficient degradation of PAHs in water over graphene oxide/Ag3PO4 composites under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J 334:355–376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagfeldt A, Graetzel M (1995) Light-induced redox reactions in nanocrystalline systems. Chem Rev 95:49–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tong X, Zhou Y, Jin L et al (2017) Heavy metal-free, near-infrared colloidal quantum dots for efficient photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Nano Energy 31:441–449View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tong X, Kong X T, Zhou Y, et al. (2017) Near-infrared, heavy metal-free colloidal “Giant” core/shell quantum dots. Adv Energy Mater 8:1701432(1-11)Google Scholar
  12. Jiao L, Wang X, Diankov G et al (2010) Facile synthesis of high-quality graphene nanoribbons. Nat Nanotechnol 5:321–325View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeong GH, Kim SH, Kim M et al (2011) Direct synthesis of noble metal/graphene nanocomposites from graphite in water: photo-synthesis. Chem Commun 47:12236–12238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Q, Zhang L, Chen G (2012) Facile preparation of graphene-copper nanoparticle composite by in situ chemical reduction for electrochemical sensing of carbohydrates. Anal Chem 84:171–178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo S, Sun S (2012) FePt nanoparticles assembled on graphene as enhanced catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 134:2492–2495View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Machado BF, Serp P (2012) Graphene-based materials for catalysis. Catal Sci Technol 2:54–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Park S, Ruoff RS (2009) Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 4:217–224View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Azimirad R, Safa S (2015) Preparation of three dimensional graphene foam–WO3 nanocomposite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Mater Chem Phys 162:686–691View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cui X, Ren P, Deng D et al (2016) Single layer graphene encapsulating non-precious metals as high-performance electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Energy Environ Sci 9:123–129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Song S, Bei B, Wu N et al (2016) Structure effect of graphene on the photocatalytic performance of plasmonic Ag/Ag 2CO3-rGO for photocatalytic elimination of pollutants. Appl Catal B Environ 181:71–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma L, Wang Y, Han Z et al (2015) Synthesis of graphene/Co3O4 composite via a hydrothermal method. Rare Metal Mat Eng 44:537–539Google Scholar
  22. Fan XF, Liu JM (2015) Graphene-supported CoPc/TiOâ synthesized by sol-gel-hydrothermal method with enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of the typical gas of landfill exhaust. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 65:50–58View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Cui C, Wang Y, Liang D et al (2014) Photo-assisted synthesis of Ag3PO4/reduced graphene oxide/Ag heterostructure photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability under visible light. Appl Catal B Environ 158-159:150–160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li XH, Chen JS, Wang X et al (2012) A green chemistry of graphene: photochemical reduction towards monolayer graphene sheets and the role of water adlayers. ChemSusChem 5:642–646View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Abulizi A, Okitsu K, Zhu JJ (2014) Ultrasound assisted reduction of graphene oxide to graphene in L-ascorbic acid aqueous solutions: kinetics and effects of various factors on the rate of graphene formation. Ultrason Sonochem 21:1174–1181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Fellahi O, Das MR, Coffinier Y et al (2011) Silicon nanowire arrays-induced graphene oxide reduction under UV irradiation. Nano 3:4662–4669Google Scholar
  27. Smirnov VA, Arbuzov A, Shul’Ga Y et al (2011) Photoreduction of graphite oxide. High Energ Chem 45:57–61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Y, Ma HL, Zhang Q et al (2012) Facile synthesis of well-dispersed graphene by g-ray induced reduction of graphene oxide. J Mater Chem 22:13064–13069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun F, Qiao X, Tan F et al (2012) One-step microwave synthesis of Ag/ZnO nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci 47:7262–7268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Safarifard V, Morsali A (2015) Applications of ultrasound to the synthesis of nanoscale metal–organic coordination polymers. Coordin Chem Rev 292:1–14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Safarifard V, Morsali A (2012) Sonochemical syntheses of a nano-sized copper(II) supramolecule as a precursor for the synthesis of copper(II) oxide nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem 19:823–829View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Geng J, Jiang F, Lu Q, Zhu JJ (2011) Ultrasound assisted self-assembly of a BaF2 hollow nest-like nanostructure. CrystEngComm 13:2758–2763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hummers W, Offeman R (1958) Preparation of graphane oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Park S, An J, Potts JR et al (2011) Hydrazine-reduction of graphite- and graphene oxide. Carbon 49:3019–3023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun S, Wang W, Zhang L (2013) Bi2WO6 quantum dots decorated reduced graphene oxide: improved charge separation and enhanced photoconversion efficiency. J Phys Chem C 117:9113–9120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fan X, Shao J, Li Z et al (2016) Facile synthesis of rGO/Ag3PO4 by enhanced photocatalytic degradation of an organic dye using a microwave-assisted method. New J Chem 40:1330–1335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen Z, Wang W, Zhang Z, Fang X (2013) High-efficiency visible-light-driven Ag3PO4/AgI photocatalysts: Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism for their enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 117:19346–19352View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Luan Z, Tian Y, Gai L et al (2017) Environment-benign synthesis of rGO/MnO x nanocomposites with superior electrochemical performance for supercapacitors. J Alloy Compd. 729:9–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang J, Yang H, Shen G et al (2010) Reduction of graphene oxide -ascorbic acid. Chem Commun 46:1112–1114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Qian J, Yang Z, Wang C et al (2015) One-pot synthesis of BiPO4 functionalized reduced graphene oxide with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance for selective and sensitive detection of chlorpyrifos. J Mater Chem A 3:13671–13678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Guo HL, Wang XF, Qian QY et al (2009) A green approach to the synthesis of graphene. Nanosheets Acs Nano 3:2653–2659View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. And GH, Zhu Y (2007) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnWO4 catalyst via fluorine doping. J Phys Chem C 111:11952–11958View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Cao Q, Xiao L, Zeng L et al (2017) Ag3PO4 /chitosan/CdS nanocomposites exhibiting high photocatalytic activities under visible-light illumination. Powder Technol 321:1–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Abulizi A, Yang GH, Zhu JJ (2014) One-step simple sonochemical fabrication and photocatalytic properties of Cu2O–rGO composites. Ultrason Sonochem 21:129–135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Yu H, Chen S, Fan X et al (2010) A structured macroporous silicon/graphene heterojunction for efficient photoconversion. Angew Chem Int Edit 49:5106–5109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeng J, Wang H, Zhang YC et al (2007) Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of pyrochlore La2Sn2O7 nanocubes. J Phys Chem C 111:11879–11887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim Y-K, Min D-H (2013) UV protection of reduced graphene oxide films by TiO2 nanoparticle incorporation. Nano 5:3638–3642Google Scholar
  48. Guo J, Zhu S, Chen Z et al (2011) Sonochemical synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles on graphene for use as photocatalyst. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1082–1090View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang X, Tian H, Yang Y et al (2012) Reduced graphene oxide/CdS for efficiently photocatalystic degradation of methylene blue. J Alloy Compd 524:5–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng WC, Wang X, Li XY (2014) The synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene on Ag3PO4 for its ultra-enhanced photocatalytic activity in phenol degradation under visible light. Nano 6:8311–8317Google Scholar
  51. Wang D, Choi D, Li J et al (2009) Self-assembled TiO2-graphene hybrid nanostructures for enhanced Li-ion insertion. ACS Nano 3:907–914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Y, Wang X, Zeng L et al (2012) Green and controlled synthesis of Cu2O–graphene hierarchical nanohybrids as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries via an ultrasound assisted approach. Dalton T. 41:4316–4319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ren Z, Kim E, Pattinson S et al (2011) Hybridizing photoactive zeolites with graphene: a powerful strategy towards superior photocatalytic properties. Chem Sci 3:209–216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Li Y, Fang L, Jin R et al (2015) Preparation and enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of novel g-C3N4 nanosheets loaded with Ag2CO3 nanoparticles. Nano 7:758–764Google Scholar
  55. Han C, Lei G, Chen C et al (2014) Novel visible light induced Co3O4 -g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange. Appl Catal B Environ 147:546–553View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Di J, Xia J, Ge Y et al (2014) Reactable ionic liquid-assisted rapid synthesis of BiOI hollow microspheres at room temperature with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Mater Chem A 2:15864–15874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Bai X, Wang L, Wang Y (2014) Enhanced oxidation ability of g-C3N4 photocatalyst via C60 modification. Appl Catal B Environ 152-153:262–270View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018