Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Ligand-Doped Copper Oxo-hydroxide Nanoparticles are Effective Antimicrobials

Nanoscale Research Letters201813:111

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2520-7

Received: 15 September 2017

Accepted: 9 April 2018

Published: 19 April 2018

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial therapies is an increasing clinical problem. This is as true for topical applications as it is for systemic therapy. Topically, copper ions may be effective and cheap antimicrobials that act through multiple pathways thereby limiting opportunities to bacteria for resistance. However, the chemistry of copper does not lend itself to facile formulations that will readily release copper ions at biologically compatible pHs. Here, we have developed nanoparticulate copper hydroxide adipate tartrate (CHAT) as a cheap, safe, and readily synthesised material that should enable antimicrobial copper ion release in an infected wound environment.

First, we synthesised CHAT and showed that this had disperse aquated particle sizes of 2–5 nm and a mean zeta potential of − 40 mV. Next, when diluted into bacterial medium, CHAT demonstrated similar efficacy to copper chloride against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, with dose-dependent activity occurring mostly around 12.5–50 mg/L of copper. Indeed, at these levels, CHAT very rapidly dissolved and, as confirmed by a bacterial copper biosensor, showed identical intracellular loading to copper ions derived from copper chloride. However, when formulated at 250 mg/L in a topically applied matrix, namely hydroxyethyl cellulose, the benefit of CHAT over copper chloride was apparent. The former yielded rapid sustained release of copper within the bactericidal range, but the copper chloride, which formed insoluble precipitates at such concentration and pH, achieved a maximum release of 10 ± 7 mg/L copper by 24 h.

We provide a practical formulation for topical copper-based antimicrobial therapy. Further studies, especially in vivo, are merited.

Keywords

CopperNanoparticleAntibacterial activityTopical antimicrobialBacterial biosensorLabile nanoparticle

Background

Microbial infections contribute to millions of deaths globally [1]. Often, the inefficiency of an antimicrobial treatment is due to microbial resistance to conventional antibiotics [25]. As such, novel antimicrobials are eagerly sought. Copper has long been recognised for its antimicrobial effects and may have the potential for greater clinical longevity than standard antibiotics since it appears to act via a multiplicity of mechanisms against bacteria, including interaction with bacterial proteins and DNA, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and disruption of membrane integrity [6, 7]. For the same reason, it is suggested that the potential for antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacterial strains to copper and other metals is limited [79]. In addition, copper is relatively cheap and is of low toxicity to humans since its essentiality at trace levels has ensured the evolution of tight homeostatic control [1012]. There is, therefore, common use of this metal for preventative infection measures, mostly to avoid bacterial biofilm formation on surfaces in high-risk areas such as hospitals and nursing homes [13, 14]. In contrast, copper has not found significant therapeutic use in topical antimicrobial formulations, unlike silver which is widely employed [15].

Bacteria are susceptible to copper loading in their intracellular environment, and the effectiveness of a copper source is related to its ability to release copper ions [16, 17]. In this respect, a significant challenge for copper-based antimicrobials is the achievement of a concentrated formulation that allows the sustained release of antimicrobial copper at effective concentrations into fluids such as wound exudate. This is because copper is a hydrolytic metal ion and as its concentration is increased at the pH of typical topical formulations (i.e. near neutral), so does its tendency to induce hydrolysis and form insoluble oxo-hydroxides [18]. At physiological pHs, these oxo-hydroxides are not good substrates for the release of soluble or, therefore, potentially efficacious, copper ions [16, 19, 20].

Recently, with the purpose of finding a bioavailable iron supplement, the issue of effective release of ferric ions from a concentrated oxo-hydroxide source under physiological conditions was solved through structural modification of the primary particles. In that work, iron was precipitated in the presence of crystal-doping GRAS ligands, namely adipic and tartaric acids, to purposefully destabilise the final ferric oxo-hydroxide structure. This strategy had the advantage of (a) preventing irreversible agglomeration of the ferric oxo-hydroxide particles and (b) greatly increasing their lability (ease of solubility) under appropriate physiological conditions. This material has been termed “iron [oxo-]hydroxide adipate tartrate” or IHAT [21, 22]. By analogy, we considered here whether copper [oxo-]hydroxide adipate tartrate (CHAT) could be synthesised and formulated at high concentrations but still release copper ions at effective antimicrobial levels. In particular, the aim of this work was to develop a cheap and scalable synthetic process that produces copper oxo-hydroxide nanoparticles that, unlike previously reported materials, should readily release biocidal concentrations of copper ions in a simulated wound environment.

Thus, in this study, we synthesised CHAT and characterised its ability to deliver bioavailable copper and, hence, to demonstrate antimicrobial activity. We have concentrated on strains of Escherichia coli as “indicator” species for Gram-negative bacteria [19, 23] but have additionally demonstrated proof-of-principle effects against Staphylococcus aureus, as Gram-positive bacteria that often obtain multidrug resistance. Hence, the study aimed to assess the value of developing CHAT further for clinical applications in topical antimicrobial therapy.

Methods

Unless otherwise stated, all experiments were performed using ultra-high purity (UHP) water (reverse osmosis purification; 18.2 ΩM/cm), at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C), and all reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.

Copper Formulations and CHAT Nanoparticles

Copper chloride stocks (40 mM copper) were prepared by dissolving CuCl2·2H2O in water. Copper oxide nanoparticle (CuO NPs; Sigma 544868) stocks were prepared from a commercial powder that was free of impurities, had a primary particle size of 34 nm (range 10–50 nm), and was previously tested as an antimicrobial agent [2426]. These stocks were prepared at 1.3 g/L copper by dispersing the powder in water with vigorous agitation. Colloidal suspensions of CHAT nanoparticles were synthesised using a co-precipitation method [27]. Briefly, copper chloride, tartaric acid, and adipic acid were dissolved in water to achieve a molar ratio of copper/tartaric acid/adipic acid in the final suspension of 2:1:1 and a copper concentration of 2.5 g/L. The initial pH of the mixture was always below 2.5, and the copper was fully solubilised. The pH was then slowly increased by a drop-wise addition of a concentrated solution of NaOH (5 M) with constant agitation until pH 8.2 ± 0.2.

Copper Content and Phase Distribution of CHAT Suspensions

Copper content in colloidal suspensions was determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Jobin Yvon 2000, Horiba). All samples were diluted down to concentrations below 100 mg/L in 5% HNO3 (v/v) at least 24 h prior to analysis to ensure full solubility of copper. Calibration standards (0.1 to 100 mg/L copper) were matrix-matched in 5% HNO3, and copper quantification was carried out at 324.754 nm. Fractionation of the copper into percentages of agglomerated, nanoparticulate, and soluble copper was achieved by filtration and ultrafiltration of CHAT stocks. Suspensions were filtered (200 nm cut-off), and the retentate was considered as the agglomerated fraction. In order to isolate the soluble copper and to distinguish it from nanoparticulate copper, the colloidal suspension was ultrafiltered through a 3-KDa filter (Sartorius Vivaspin 500 VS0192; 16,000×g, 5 min) as this corresponds to a cut-off below 1 nm (Zetasizer Software 7.11, Malvern Instruments Ltd). The copper content of all fractions (total, 200 nm filtrate, 3 KDa ultrafiltrate) was determined by ICP-OES, and fractions expressed as percentage in relation to total copper content are as follows:
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\%\mathrm{Soluble}\ \mathrm{Copper}\ \left(<1\mathrm{nm}\right)\%\kern0.5em =\frac{\kern0.5em {Cu}_{3\mathrm{KDa}}}{Cu_{\mathrm{Total}}}\times 100\\ {}\%\mathrm{Agglomerated}\ \mathrm{Copper}=\frac{\ {Cu}_{\mathrm{Total}}-{Cu}_{<200\mathrm{nm}}\kern0.5em }{Cu_{\mathrm{Total}}}\kern0.5em \times 100\\ {}\%\mathrm{Nanoparticulate}\kern0.5em \mathrm{Copper}\kern0.5em =100-\%\mathrm{Agglomerated}\ \mathrm{copper}-\%\mathrm{Soluble}\ \mathrm{copper}\end{array}} $$

Determination of Copper Content and Copper to Ligand Ratios in Dry CHAT Nanoparticles

CHAT nanoparticles were agglomerated and precipitated to enable recovery and removal of unbound components. To enable this, ethanol was added to colloidal suspensions of CHAT (2.5 g/L copper) at a ratio of 2:1 ethanol/suspension (v/v), and the resulting CHAT agglomerates were recovered by centrifugation (4500×g × 15 min in a Mistral 6000). The solution phase, containing unbound ligand species, was discarded. Determination of copper content in solid-phase CHAT was as follows. A powder was produced by oven-drying the ethanolic precipitated pellet to constant weight at 45 °C. This was then milled and 35.2 ± 0.3 mg (n = 2) was digested in 11 ± 1 g of 70% HNO3, with accurate weights recorded. Once fully digested, this solution was diluted 20-fold in water and the copper concentration determined by ICP-OES. Ligand to copper ratios were determined directly from dried, ethanol-precipitated CHAT agglomerates. The agglomerates were first re-suspended in water to their original volume to facilitate dissolution with lower amounts of HCl—a requirement for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Aliquots were either dissolved in 5% HNO3 for ICP-OES analysis of copper (as described above) or in 80 mM HCl for HPLC analysis of ligands (tartaric and adipic acids). Ligand analysis was carried out in a standard reverse phase chromatography system (C18 column in a Waters Alliance 2690/5 equipped with a 2998 PDA detector; further details are given in Additional file 1).

Physicochemical Characterisation of CHAT Suspensions

Hydrodynamic particle size distribution was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zetasizer NanoZS, Malvern Instruments Ltd). Aliquots of CHAT colloidal suspensions (2.5 g/L copper) were transferred to a 1-mL disposable cuvette, and measurements (n = 3) were carried out at 25 ± 2 °C. Again, the exact settings are shown in Additional file 2. The zeta potential of CHAT suspensions was determined by laser Doppler micro-electrophoresis (Zetasizer NanoZS, Malvern Instruments Ltd) using disposable folded capillary cells (DTS1070) and assuming a dielectric constant of 78.5 and a viscosity of 0.89 cP. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterisation was carried out applying a droplet of CHAT suspension to holey carbon perforated grids and drying at 50 °C overnight. Grids were then imaged on the TEM (FEI-Philips CM100) at 120 kV in bright-field mode.

Antimicrobial Activity of Copper Formulations

Assays were carried out in heavy metal MOPS (HMM) medium, a recognised metal-ion compatible medium (Additional file 3), which was supplemented with 0.4% glucose and 0.1% casein acid hydrolysate, and pH adjusted to 7.2 ± 0.2 [28]. Prior to the addition of copper compounds, Escherichia coli (NCTC11100) and Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 [29] were grown overnight at 30 °C under constant shaking in an Infors HT Minitron incubator at 80 rpm. Afterwards, the bacterial suspensions were diluted to an optical density of 0.05–0.1 (ca. 106 cells/mL) at 595 nm for E. coli (Multiskan RC 351 Labsystem) or 600 nm for S. aureus (Multiskan plate reader, ThermoFisher Scientific). Next, stocks of copper chloride and colloidal CHAT were diluted in HMM and added to the bacterial suspensions to obtain final copper concentrations between 0.4 and 100 mg/L. Incubation then took place for a period of 6 to 9 h, and bacterial growth was determined by monitoring optical density as a measure of bacterial biomass.

Copper solubility over time in bacterial growth medium was determined by diluting copper chloride and colloidal CHAT stocks in HMM to 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/L copper and determining the fraction of soluble copper at 0, 2, 4, and 8 h through ultrafiltration (3 KDa) and ICP-OES analysis, as described above.

Intracellular Bioavailability of Copper Formulations

Recombinant bioluminescent Cu-sensing bacteria, E. coli MC1061 (pSLcueR/pDNPcopAlux), which respond to sub-toxic amounts of bioavailable copper by increasing their bioluminescence were used to quantify the bioavailability of copper compounds [30]. Bacterial suspensions were prepared as described for the antimicrobial activity assay and incubated with a series of dilutions of copper chloride and CHAT (0 to 50 mg/L copper) on 96-well microplates for 4 h. Bioluminescence was measured with an Orion II Plate Luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems), and induction of bioluminescence was calculated as follows:
$$ Bioluminescence\ in duction, Fold\ Change=\frac{ Bioluminescen ce\ in\ Cu\ exposure}{Bioluminescen\mathrm{ce}\ without\ Cu\ } $$

Intracellular Stress Induced by Copper Formulations

The ability of copper compounds to induce intracellular superoxide anions and single-strand DNA breaks was assessed with recombinant bioluminescent bacteria, E. coli K12::soxRSsodAlux and E. coli MC1061 (pDEWrecAlux), respectively [17]. Bacterial cultures were prepared as described for the antimicrobial assay, and bacteria were exposed to a series of dilutions of copper chloride and CHAT (0 to 50 mg/L copper) on white 96-well microplates over 4 h. The biosensors’ performances were controlled by exposing bacteria to the superoxide anion-inducing chemical menadione (0.04–30 μg/L), or to hydrogen peroxide (0.1–150 mg/L), as positive controls for E. coli K12::soxRSsodAlux or E. coli MC1061 (pDEWrecAlux), respectively. Again, bacteria were incubated on white 96-well microplates and bioluminescence was measured with an Orion II Plate Luminometer and induction of bioluminescence was calculated as in Eq. 5.

Incorporation of Copper Formulations in Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Gels

Stocks of copper chloride, CHAT, and commercial, unmodified copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) were diluted in UHP water to 250 mg/L copper. The resulting suspensions of CHAT and CuO NPs were at near neutral pH and could be incorporated directly in the gel, but copper chloride solution was still acidic after dilution and was therefore adjusted to pH 7.0 ± 0.2. Hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) was then dissolved directly (2% w/v) into the various diluted stocks using a roller mixer (Denley Spiramix 5) until homogenous gels were formed. Ten grams of each gel was transferred into Falcon tubes and allowed to settle overnight. Next, 10 mL of freshly prepared 50 mM sodium bicarbonate buffer (dissolved from NaHCO3 powder and adjusted to pH 7.0 ± 0.2) was transferred into each tube with care to minimise disturbances at the gel-liquid interface (specific surface area of 7.1 cm2). Aliquots were then collected and analysed by ICP-OES to determine copper release over time.

Results

As described in the “Methods” section, CHAT was synthesised in a similar fashion to its iron analogue, IHAT [21, 22], by doping copper oxo-hydroxide (2.5 g/L copper) with tartaric and adipic acids. This produced stable colloidal suspensions in which all copper went through a 200-nm filter but very little (5%) passed a 3-KDa filter. This indicated that most copper was nanoparticulate (95%; Fig. 1a) with little “free” copper and no detectable large agglomerates—again like the IHAT analogue [21, 22]. When precipitated in ethanol, to remove unbound ligand species, and then dried, CHAT contained 31 ± 1% copper (w/w) by ICP-OES analysis. Copper to ligand molar ratios, the latter determined by HPLC, were 2:1 for copper to tartrate and 2:0.3 for copper to adipate. CHAT particles appeared almost monodisperse with diameters of 2–3 nm by TEM imaging (Fig. 1b). These findings were consistent with hydrodynamic sizing data for CHAT plus a hydration shell since the median diameter by volume in UHP water was 3.4 nm (Fig. 1c) and the size distribution was narrow (2.4–5.6 nm for 80% of the volume) when assessed with dynamic light scattering. The average zeta potential was − 39 mV (Fig. 1d), consistent with the nanoparticles that form a stable aquated dispersion [27], and, indeed, the CHAT stock suspension was shown to be stable for several years (Additional file 4).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Characterisation of CHAT stock solution. a Copper phase distribution at 2.5 g/L CHAT: soluble (< 3 KDa) and nanoparticulate percentage. b Nanoparticle dispersion imaging by TEM. c Hydrodynamic particle size distribution of freshly prepared particles, as determined by dynamic light scattering. d Zeta potential distribution (n = 3; error bars represent standard deviations)

Next, we considered the antimicrobial activity of CHAT when stock suspensions were diluted in bacterial growth media to concentrations associated with the antimicrobial activity of copper salts. For CHAT and copper chloride, the growth inhibition curve was very similar for both E. coli and S. aureus with most activity occurring at total copper concentrations between the 12.5 and 50 mg/L range (Fig. 2). Complete E. coli growth inhibition was observed upon incubation with 18.8 (CuCl2) and 25 (CHAT) mg/L copper, whilst for S. aureus, full growth inhibition was obtained at 75 (CuCl2) and 100 (CHAT) mg/L copper (Fig. 2; Percentage growth inhibition vs copper concentration is provided in Additional file 5).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Escherichia coli (top) and Staphylococcus aureus (bottom) growth curves, represented here as optical density, upon exposure to different concentrations of copper chloride (left) or CHAT (right) in supplemented HMM.

Indeed, at these antimicrobial concentrations, at least 94% of CHAT was rapidly solubilised (within 15 min), again as judged by ultrafiltration and ICP-OES analysis (Fig. 3a). We therefore anticipated that the antimicrobial effectiveness of CHAT was linked to this chemical lability, with rapid dissolution of the nanoparticles allowing intracellular bacterial acquisition of copper ions. To test this, we challenged the Cu-sensing E. coli, MC1061 (pSLcueR/pDNPcopAlux), in which bioluminescence increases in response to sub-toxic concentrations of intracellular copper ions [30], with 0 to 50 mg/L copper as CHAT or copper chloride. Increasing concentrations in the culture medium of both sources of copper led to increasing bioluminescence in the E. coli copper sensor strain (Fig. 3b), consistent with rises in intracellular copper. The slope of the dose-response curve was identical up to 6.25 mg/L for both sources of copper confirming that bioavailable copper from CHAT was comparable to a fully solubilised source. Thereafter, at concentrations up to 50 mg/L copper, the luminescence did not increase due to the toxicity of both copper compounds (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

a Dissolution profile of CHAT in supplemented HMM at 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/L copper. Dose-response of bioluminescence induction of recombinant luminescent bacteria: b intracellular copper ion-responding E. coli MC1061 pSLcueR/pDNPcopAlux bacteria, c DNA damage-responding E. coli MC1061 (pDEWrecAlux), and d superoxide anion-responding E. coli K12::soxRSsodAlux upon exposure for 4 h in supplemented HMM to copper chloride, CHAT (concentration in mg Cu/L), and respective controls (menadione in c and H2O2 in d)

In parallel to studying intracellular copper in E. coli exposed to solutions prepared with CHAT or copper chloride, we also tested the ability of these solutions to trigger intracellular superoxide anions or to cause bacterial DNA damage in different E. coli-based biosensors. In neither case was there a significantly observable effect, despite the sensors responding to relevant positive controls, namely hydrogen peroxide and menadione, respectively (Fig. 3c, d). Taken together, the equivalent responses of the three bacterial biosensors to solutions prepared from different chemical forms of copper strongly support the notion that, in both cases, bacteria were being exposed to the same soluble copper, in spite of one formulation starting out as nanoparticulate.

Finally, as noted above, the advantage of CHAT over soluble copper salts would only be apparent if a concentrated formulation allowed the former to retain its chemical lability unlike the latter. Using hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), a common aqueous base for topical formulations [3133], we incorporated 250 mg/L copper as either copper chloride, CHAT, or as the commercial CuO NPs. When 10 mL of 50 mM NaHCO3 buffer, as a simplified wound exudate, were added to 10 g of each of the copper-incorporated HEC gels (i.e. 2.5 mg copper), there was sustained release of copper from the CHAT-containing preparation, to greater than 60 mg/L by 24 h (Fig. 4). Moreover, release was relatively rapid with antimicrobially active concentrations being achieved by 2–4 h. In contrast, pH-neutralised copper chloride was a poor substrate for copper release, as anticipated by its tendency to hydrolyse and form agglomerates of copper oxo-hydroxides, so by 24 h, only 10 ± 7 mg/L copper had been achieved in solution (Fig. 4). The commercial CuO NPs yielded no discernible copper release at all (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Copper release from HEC matrices containing CHAT, copper chloride, or copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs), all at 250 mg/L copper

Discussion

We show here that a copper-based nanomaterial, namely CHAT, can be formulated at high concentrations, unlike previously described copper-based nanoparticles [34, 35], whilst retaining its properties as a labile source of bioavailable copper with antimicrobial efficacy. As noted above, the synthesis of CHAT was inspired following many years’ previous work on the iron analogue, IHAT [21, 22]. This, in turn, was inspired by nature’s solution to rapid mineral turnover in vivo, for the efficient recycling of essential metal ions, whereby organic molecules are used to destabilise the crystal structure of primary mineral particles [21, 22]. In the synthetic versions, GRAS ligands are incorporated into metal oxo-hydroxides as they form in solution from cross-linking polymers [21, 22]. Through structural destabilisation, this ensures lability of the final mineral phase and also generates highly negative nanoparticles—as demonstrated by the zeta potential measurement—which repel agglomeration and aggregation, thus producing nanoparticle suspensions that were stable for years. Here, and as previously shown for IHAT, tartrate was the dominant ligand in achieving these physicochemical changes to the copper oxo-hydroxide structure since its incorporation was ca. 3-fold greater than that of adipate—the latter behaving more so as a buffer during synthesis [21, 22].

In the absence of modification, freshly precipitated metal oxo-hydroxides will agglomerate and aggregate and will start to age, whereby they condense and gradually increase their crystallinity. These size and mineral phase transitions reduce the ability of the structures to participate in the reverse reaction, i.e. to re-dissolve. It was therefore unsurprising that when copper oxo-hydroxide was freshly formed, from pH neutralisation of a copper chloride solution, at least some soluble copper was released in our gel release assay (Fig. 4), whereas for the commercial CuO NPs, which were agglomerated and comprised a more condensed mineral phase (i.e. copper oxide), undetectable copper was released. The lack of dissolution from commercial 30 nm nanoparticles—which, regardless of their aggregation state, would have presented a large surface area for dissolution—shows that mineral phase is a key driver in the release of copper ions and that, as noted above, modification of the mineral’s primary particles, achieved here through ligand doping, is really required to bring about a marked shift in dissolution characteristics. Furthermore, the synthesis of CHAT was carried out at room temperature, since high synthetic temperature favours less amorphous phases which consequently may reduce dissolution rates. Also, room temperature synthesis has the benefit of reducing energetic costs when manufacturing at scale.

Whilst there may be other ways to formulate high, stable concentrations of copper that enables sustained release and rapid dissolution of ions when required, we cannot envisage another synthesis that is so straightforward and the cost of goods (for reactants) so low. These are important factors as the issue of topical infections and bacterial resistance are by no means restricted to developed countries. Developing countries are increasingly plagued by bacterial resistance issues and so affordable efficacious solutions are urgently required [36, 37]. Although there are insufficient studies to reach concrete solutions, there is evidence that resistance to toxic metal ions is more difficult for bacteria to achieve than resistance to conventional antibiotics [7]. The theory is predicated on the idea that copper and silver probably do not have discrete pathways of antimicrobial activity but, rather, can impact multiple targets including various enzyme systems and thus can destabilise the overall bacterial cell structure [17, 19, 38]. Indeed, it has been shown that bacteria remain susceptible to copper and certain other metals ions in spite of exposures over centuries [6, 7, 39]. Interestingly, there is recent evidence that metal-based antimicrobials can even return bacterial sensitivity to conventional antibiotics in spite of prior resistance [40, 41].

Conclusions

Here, we have demonstrated that the issue of bioavailable copper ions, at physiological pHs and high concentrations, can be solved by doping a copper nanomineral with organic acids, in a similar strategy to that previously utilised for iron analogues [21, 22]. These copper-based nanoparticles (termed CHAT) readily dissolved in the bacterial medium, showing equivalent intracellular copper uptake and antibacterial activity to soluble copper salts. Critically, however, and unlike for simple copper salts, CHAT can be concentrated in a pH-neutral formulation and retain its lability in terms of copper ion release. Indeed, CHAT released copper ions within the bactericidal range and could thus be the basis for a novel, topical antimicrobial agent either alone or enhancing the efficacy of resisting antibiotics. With increasing antibiotic resistance, new topical antimicrobials are needed and CHAT is inexpensive, readily synthesised, and uses components that are generally recognised as safe (GRAS). In vivo studies are merited.

Abbreviations

CHAT: 

Copper [oxo]-hydroxide adipate tartrate nanoparticles

CuO NPs: 

Copper oxide nanoparticles

DLS: 

Dynamic light scattering

Escherichia coli

E. coli

GRAS: 

Generally recognised as safe

HEC: 

Hydroxyethylcellulose

HMM: 

Heavy metal MOPS medium

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography

ICP-OES: 

Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry

IHAT: 

Iron [oxo]-hydroxide adipate tartrate nanoparticles

MOPS: 

3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid

Staphylococcus aureus

S. aureus

UHP: 

Ultra-high purity

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to thank Stephen Young (MRC EWL, Cambridge) for the HPLC analysis.

Funding

This work is a publication of the UK Medical Research Council, University of Cambridge (UK), and National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Estonia. The Medical Research Council (programme grant number: MC_U105960399U1059), Estonian Research Council grants IUT 23-5 (Anne Kahru), PUT 748 and European Regional Development Fund project TK134 (Angela Ivask), and PUT1015 (Olesja Bondarenko) are acknowledged.

Availability of Data and Materials

Raw data and materials are available on reasonable request.

Authors’ Contributions

CB performed the majority of the experimental work including the data collection, analysis, and interpretation, under the supervision of NF, in terms of the development and/or characterisation of CHAT and other materials. CB, AI, and OB contributed experimentally and/or with guidance in data acquisition and interpretation for the microbiology work, in particular with the bacterial biosensors, under the mentorship of AK. The overall project was overseen by JP. All authors played key roles in the experimental design and drafting of the manuscript. Critical revision and approval of the final manuscript was provided by all authors.

Competing Interests

Carlos A. P. Bastos, Nuno Faria, and Jonathan J. Powell are inventors on an MRC-owned patent detailing the use of copper oxo-hydroxide structures as antimicrobials [27] and could benefit, downstream, from the institution’s financial award to inventors scheme. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biomineral Research Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
(2)
Biomineral Research Group, Department of Mineral Science and Technology, MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
(3)
National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Tallinn, Estonia
(4)
Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia

References

  1. WHO (2017) The top 10 causes of death. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/
  2. OECD. Global antimicrobial use in the livestock sector. 2015Google Scholar
  3. O'Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Reviews on Antimicrobial Resistance; 2016Google Scholar
  4. EU. The bacterial challenge, time to react. 2009Google Scholar
  5. Lewis K (2013) Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(5):371–387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Borkow G, Gabbay J (2009) Copper, an ancient remedy returning to fight microbial, fungal and viral infections. Curr Chem Biol 3(3):272–278Google Scholar
  7. Lemire JA, Harrison JJ, Turner RJ (2013) Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat Rev Micro 11(6):371–384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pelgrift RY, Friedman AJ (2013) Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(13):1803–1815View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Workentine ML, Harrison JJ, Stenroos PU, Ceri H, Turner RJ (2008) Pseudomonas fluorescens’ view of the periodic table. Environ Microbiol 10(1):238–250Google Scholar
  10. Collins JF, Klevay LM (2011) Copper. Adv Nutr 2(6):520–522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang Y, Hodgkinson V, Zhu S, Weisman GA, Petris MJ (2011) Advances in the understanding of mammalian copper transporters. Adv Nutr 2(2):129–137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dameron CT, Harrison MD (1998) Mechanisms for protection against copper toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 67(5 Suppl):1091s–1097sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wheeldon LJ, Worthington T, Lambert PA, Hilton AC, Lowden CJ, Elliott TS (2008) Antimicrobial efficacy of copper surfaces against spores and vegetative cells of Clostridium difficile: the germination theory. J Antimicrob Chemother 62(3):522–525View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt MG, Attaway HH, Sharpe PA, John J Jr, Sepkowitz KA, Morgan A et al (2012) Sustained reduction of microbial burden on common hospital surfaces through introduction of copper. J Clin Microbiol 50(7):2217–2223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter MJ, Tingley-Kelley K, Warriner RA 3rd. (2010) Silver treatments and silver-impregnated dressings for the healing of leg wounds and ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(4):668–679View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Delgado K, Quijada R, Palma R, Palza H (2011) Polypropylene with embedded copper metal or copper oxide nanoparticles as a novel plastic antimicrobial agent. Lett Appl Microbiol 53(1):50–54View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bondarenko O, Ivask A, Kakinen A, Kahru A (2012) Sub-toxic effects of CuO nanoparticles on bacteria: kinetics, role of Cu ions and possible mechanisms of action. Environ Pollut (Barking, Essex : 1987) 169:81–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Richardson HW (2000) Copper compounds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 273–298. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/14356007.a07_567
  19. Chatterjee AK, Chakraborty R, Basu T (2014) Mechanism of antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 25(13):135101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kent RD, Vikesland PJ (2016) Dissolution and persistence of copper-based nanomaterials in undersaturated solutions with respect to cupric solid phases. Environ Sci Technol 50(13):6772–6781View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pereira DIA, Bruggraber SFA, Faria N, Poots LK, Tagmount MA, Aslam MF et al (2014) Nanoparticulate iron(III) oxo-hydroxide delivers safe iron that is well absorbed and utilised in humans. Nanomedicine 10(8):1877–1886View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell JJ, Bruggraber SF, Faria N, Poots LK, Hondow N, Pennycook TJ et al (2014) A nano-disperse ferritin-core mimetic that efficiently corrects anemia without luminal iron redox activity. Nanomedicine 10(7):1529–1538View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jung WK, Koo HC, Kim KW, Shin S, Kim SH, Park YH (2008) Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of the silver ion in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(7):2171–2178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Moschini E, Gualtieri M, Colombo M, Fascio U, Camatini M, Mantecca P (2013) The modality of cell–particle interactions drives the toxicity of nanosized CuO and TiO2 in human alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicol Lett 222(2):102–116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasemets K, Ivask A, Dubourguier H-C, Kahru A (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticles of ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol in Vitro 23(6):1116–1122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Aruoja V, Dubourguier HC, Kasemets K, Kahru A (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci Total Environ 407(4):1461–1468View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bastos CAP, Bruggraber SFA, Faria NJR, Powell JJ. Antibacterial compositions comprising copper oxo-hydroxide nanoparticles and their uses as biocidal agents. 2016Google Scholar
  28. LaRossa RA, Smulski DR, Van Dyk TK (1995) Interaction of lead nitrate and cadmium chloride with Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella typhimurium global regulatory mutants. J Ind Microbiol 14(3):252–258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nair D, Memmi G, Hernandez D, Bard J, Beaume M, Gill S et al (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus strain RN4220, a key laboratory strain used in virulence research, identifies mutations that affect not only virulence factors but also the fitness of the strain. J Bacteriol 193(9):2332–2335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivask A, Rõlova T, Kahru A (2009) A suite of recombinant luminescent bacterial strains for the quantification of bioavailable heavy metals and toxicity testing. BMC Biotechnol 9:41View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Li L, Ben Y, Yuan S, Jiang S, Xu J, Zhang X (2012) Efficacy, stability, and biosafety of Sifuvirtide gel as a microbicide candidate against HIV-1. PLoS One 7(5):e37381View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Koutsoulas C, Suleiman E, Wagner A, Zabka M (2014) Comparative study between synthetic and phospholipids of natural origin: effect of phospholipid selection on the behavior of a topical liposomal dosage form incorporating terbinafine. J Lipid Res 24(4):336–343Google Scholar
  33. Zaslansky R, Ben-Nun O, Ben-Shitrit S, Ullmann Y, Kopf A, Stein C (2014) A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study assessing the analgesic effect of morphine applied topically onto split-thickness skin wounds. J Pharm Pharmacol 66(11):1559–1566View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M, Atabe AN (2017) The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: causes and control strategies. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 6(1):47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ocsoy I, Gulbakan B, Chen T, Zhu GZ, Chen Z, Sari MM et al (2013) DNA-guided metal-nanoparticle formation on graphene oxide surface. Adv Mater 25(16):2319–2325View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Duman F, Ocsoy I, Kup FO (2016) Chamomile flower extract-directed CuO nanoparticle formation for its antioxidant and DNA cleavage properties. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 60:333–338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Reardon S (2014) Antibiotic resistance sweeping developing world. Nature 509(7499):141–142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ingle AP, Duran N, Rai M (2014) Bioactivity, mechanism of action, and cytotoxicity of copper-based nanoparticles: a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(3):1001–1009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Borkow G, Gabbay J (2005) Copper as a biocidal tool. Curr Med Chem 12(18):2163–2175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Morones-Ramirez JR, Winkler JA, Spina CS, Collins JJ (2013) Silver enhances antibiotic activity against gram-negative bacteria. Sci Transl Med 5(190):190ra81–190ra81View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Auda SH, Mrestani Y, Fetouh MI, Neubert RH (2008) Characterization and activity of cephalosporin metal complexes. Pharmazie 63(8):555–561Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement