 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Temperature and Pressure Dependences of the Elastic Properties of Tantalum Single Crystals Under <100> Tensile Loading: A Molecular Dynamics Study
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 13, Article number: 118 (2018)
The Correction to this article has been published in Nanoscale Research Letters 2018 13:162
Abstract
Atomistic simulations are capable of providing insights into physical mechanisms responsible for mechanical properties of the transition metal of Tantalum (Ta). By using molecular dynamics (MD) method, temperature and pressure dependences of the elastic properties of Ta single crystals are investigated through <100> tensile loading. First of all, a comparative study between two types of embeddedatom method (EAM) potentials is made in term of the elastic properties of Ta single crystals. The results show that RaveloEAM (Physical Review B, 2013, 88: 134101) potential behaves well at different hydrostatic pressures. Then, the MD simulation results based on the RaveloEAM potential show that Ta will experience a bodycenteredcubic (BCC) to facecenteredcubic (FCC) phase transition before fracture under <100> tensile loading at 1 K temperature, and model size and strain rate have no obvious effects on tensile behaviors of Ta. Next, from the simulation results at the system temperature from 1 to 1500 K, it can be derived that the elastic modulus of E_{100} linearly decrease with the increasing temperature, while the yielding stress decrease with conforming a quadratic polynomial formula. Finally, the pressure dependence of the elastic properties is performed from 0 to 140 GPa and the observations show that the elastic modulus increases with the increasing pressure overall.
Background
In general, Tantalum (Ta) belongs to BCC structure at ambient condition. At present, numerous literatures have proved that Ta single crystals show excellent phase stability [1,2,3] under high pressures. What is more, Ta has a very high melting temperature 3269 K at ambient pressure which is higher than most of other metals [4]. Because of its excellent properties, Ta is an ideal material for many technological applications, such as diffusion barrier in micro/nanoelectronics, wear protection coating, and hightemperature superalloys.
Recently, a great deal of effort both in experimental [2, 5,6,7] and theoretical [8,9,10,11,12,13,14] fields have been put into the highpressure and high temperature properties of Ta. Dewaele et al. [5] studied the effects of pressure on the yield strength of Ta in a diamondanvil cell (DAC) up to 93 GPa, and the DAC experiments also presented the BCC structure remained stable up to 135 GPa [2]. In addition, Shigeaki [8] simulated equation of state (EOS) of Ta up to 100 GPa and 3000 K using DFT. Wu et al. [9] investigated the elastic and thermodynamic properties of Ta at highpressures up to 350 GPa. Meanwhile, Škoro et al. [6, 7] measured the yield strength and Young’s modulus of Ta at very high temperatures up to 2250 and 2500 K, respectively. Gu et al. [10] performed a study on the highpressure structure and elastic properties of the cubic Ta up to 500 GPa using the firstprinciples method. It is found that the elastic constants as a function of pressure, and that bulk, Young’s, and shear modulus of Ta all increased with the increasing pressure.
In addition to DAC experiments and DFT calculations, there are also many studies at high temperature and high pressure in the field of MD simulations [15,16,17,18]. Liu et al. [15] used the extended FinnisSinclair (EFS) potential and investigated thermal EOS as well as melting properties of Ta at pressures up to 400 GPa. Besides, Tramontina et al. [16, 17] studied the effects of crystal orientation on plasticity mechanisms at high pressures. They also discussed the influence of shock strength and shock rise time on their microstructures. Furthermore, Ruestes et al. [18] carried out indentation simulations for BCC Ta using three different interatomic potentials and presented the defect mechanisms responsible for the creation and expansion of the plastic deformation zone.
Despite the numerous investigations above, there has not been a systematic atomistic simulation study of the dynamic response of Ta under tensile loading using MD simulations. The main purpose of the present work is to investigate the elastic properties of Ta single crystals under <100> tensile loading, considering the effects of size, strain rate, temperature, and pressure. In addition, to understand whether a phase transition could be induced through <100> tensile loading is another purpose for this work.
Methods/Experimental
Physical Modeling
As shown in Fig. 1, the Ta cubic investigated in this paper are generated by repeating a BCC unit cell along the <001>, <010>, and <100> orientations and the lattice parameters are a = b = c = 3.301 Å, respectively. Four cubic models with different edge lengths, including 12a (3.96 nm), 18a (5.94 nm), 24a (7.92 nm), and 30a (9.90 nm), are constructed. The corresponding number of atoms is 3456, 11,664, 27,648, and 54,000, respectively. Figure 1 shows the sketch map of Ta cubic with the edge length of 3.96 nm, which is the original structure in our present simulations.
MD Simulation Details
Our MD simulations reported in this paper are performed using the largescale atomic/molecular massively parallel simulator (LAMMPS) [19]. During the process of MD simulation, the external force applied on Ta atoms is calculated according to the interatomic potential functions between those atoms. In this study, two different interatomic potentials are considered: the EAM potential by Zhou et al. [20] and Ravelo et al. [21], respectively. Both potentials were applied in reproducing some elastic properties of Ta which are listed in Table 1. For the sake of simplicity, they will be referred as RaveloEAM and ZhouEAM potentials.
The elastic behavior of structures with cubic symmetry is described completely by their elastic constants, C_{11}, C_{12}, and C_{44}. The orientationdependent elastic modulus for <100>, <110>, and <111> single crystals are calculated by means of the several equations [18]. In our work, MD simulations are performed to study the effects on the elastic modulus under <100> tensile loading. Hence, we focus on the elastic modulus for <100 > orientation and take the elastic modulus of E_{100} into account. Consequently, we consider the elastic constants C_{11} and C_{12} as well as the following equation [22]:
In general, there are three methods to calculate the elastic constants from MD including stressfluctuation method, strainfluctuation method, and direct method. In present work, the direct method which is similar to that of Gao et al. [23] is utilized to calculate the elastic constants C_{11} and C_{12} for two types of EAM potentials, as shown in Fig. 2.
From Fig. 2a, one can find that the obtained curves of both C_{11} and C_{12} based on the ZhouEAM potential cannot keep smoothgoing with the increasing pressure up to 140 GPa. There is a crossover point at the pressure of ~ 40 GPa, i.e., C_{11} = C_{12}, at which the elastic modulus of E_{100} will be zero according to Eq. (1). Moreover, E_{100} will present a negative value the pressure higher than 40 GPa, which is suspicious and conflict with the theoretical and experimental results [24, 25]. Therefore, the ZhouEAM potential performs poorly in the range considered here. Then, let us examine the feasibility of the RaveloEAM potential from the MD simulation results of C_{11} and C_{12} based on the RaveloEAM potential pictured in Fig. 2b. Numerical results show that the higher the pressure, the bigger the values of both C_{11} and C_{12}, which agrees well with the trend of the elastic constants changing with pressures through DFT calculations [9, 25]. Meanwhile, the results calculated using the RaveloEAM potential is remarkable the same as the values reported by Ruestes et al. [18]. The RaveloEAM potential behaves well under high pressure and at the same time it can also describe the elastic and mechanical properties of Ta under dynamic deformation [26]. Therefore, we will perform our simulations based on the RaveloEAM potential in the following sections.
After geometric construction, we carry out a series of relevant MD simulations. During the MD simulations, the periodic boundary conditions (PBC) are used in all three directions of the cubic models. The time step is set as 1 fs, and the system temperature is set as 1, 300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1500 K to explore the temperature dependence of elastic properties of Ta. First, the model is relaxed about 50 ps relaxation process using a canonical ensemble (NVT) MD simulation in order that the system lies in local potential minimum. Then, it used isothermalisobaric (NPT) MD simulation to ensure a specified hydrostatic pressure ranging from 0 to 140 GPa to study the effects of pressure on elastic properties of Ta [27]. Finally, a tensile loading with a strain rate ranging from 5 × 10^{8} s^{− 1} to 7.5 × 10^{9} s^{− 1} [28, 29] is applied in xdirection of Ta cubic. Meanwhile, NPT simulation is performed in the y and zdirections at the same pressure applied in the second step. Therefore, the elastic modulus calculated here is for <100> orientation. For all MD simulations, the models will be stretched to an elongation of 15% in the xdirection through <100> tensile loading.
Results and Discussion
Stretching Process
During the stretching process, the simulated configurations are visualized using the scientific software package Open Visualization Tool (OVITO) [30]. The stressstrain curve of Ta under <100> uniaxial tensile strains at zero pressure and the corresponding atomic configurations with different strains are shown in Fig. 3.
As shown in Fig. 3, it can be concluded from the stressstrain curve that the surface fractures nearby the configuration (IV). At the beginning of the uniaxial tensile strains, the stress changes typically linearly with the strain and Fig. 3I shows that the atomic configurations maintain BCC structures. As the strain increases, the phase transition from BCC to FCC structures starts at the strain of ~ 7.4% and completes at the strain of ~ 9.8%, as shown in Fig. 3II, II, respectively. And these FCC structures keep the maximum before the first surface fracture. When the strain is ~ 13.1%, the edge lengths of y and zdirections decrease abruptly, which results in surface fracture. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that clusters happen at a very short time, as shown in Fig. 3IV. Under continuous uniaxial deformation, the atomic configuration maintain stripelike until the strain is ~ 13.3%, which is shown in Fig. 3V.
In this paper, we concentrate on the dependence of tensile properties on model size, strain rate, temperature, and pressure, as discussed in this section. Theoretically, the model is stretched linearly in the elastic deformation stage and the elastic modulus is defined as the slope of the linear portion of the stressstrain curve. It can be found that all the models have the similar stretching process, and the stressstrain curves have the similar variation tendencies. Therefore, we use the same approach to gain the elastic modulus of Ta of various model sizes and strain rates.
Dependence on Size and Strain Rate
Table 2 lists the elastic modulus and the yielding stress of the different model sizes at the temperature of 1 K and the strain rate of 5 × 10^{8} s^{− 1}. It can be easily concluded that model sizes have no effects on elastic modulus and yielding stress of Ta. This is very easy to explain that the elastic modulus is to describe the interaction between atoms, while the elastic modulus does not vary with the model sizes. It can be seen from the Table 2 that the elastic modulus is ~ 139 GPa, remarkably the same as the simulation result of 140 GPa [18].
According to the existing Refs. [28, 29], most of strain rates range from 10^{8} s^{− 1} to 10^{10} s^{− 1}. In this paper, four strain rates are selected to perform tensile simulations, including 5.0 × 10^{8} s^{− 1}, 7.5 × 10^{8} s^{− 1}, 5.0 × 10^{9} s^{− 1}, and 7.5 × 10^{9} s^{− 1}. Table 3 lists the elastic modulus and the yielding stress at the temperature of 300 K and at different strain rates. It can be easily concluded that strain rate has no obvious effects on the elastic modulus and the yielding stress.
Meanwhile, we also simulate the effects of model size and strain rate on the elastic modulus and the yielding stress under different temperatures and pressures. These simulations come to the same conclusion. Therefore, we will use the same model size of 3.96 nm and the same strain rate of 5 × 10^{8} s^{− 1} for the following simulations.
Dependence on Temperature
Figure 4 shows the stressstrain curves at different temperatures up to 1500 K. It can be seen that the slopes of these curves that denotes the elastic modulus in <100> orientation, i.e., E_{100}, during elastic tension period and the yielding stress are gradually decreasing with the increasing temperature. According to the theory of thermodynamics [31], the total kinetic energy of all the atoms of the system generally satisfies the following equation:
where E_{k} is the total kinetic energy of the system; N is the total number of atoms; K_{B} is the Boltzmann constant; T is the thermodynamic temperature. Therefore, it can be concluded that the system contains greater total kinetic energy with the higher temperature, and the atoms move faster. From the thermodynamic point of view, the atoms become more active and the motion of the atoms is more intensive, which means greater amplitude in its equilibrium position. In stretching process, the attractive force between atoms relatively reduced and atoms escape from the equilibrium position easily, so the stress in xdirection reduces at the same strain. Therefore, the elastic modulus at higher temperature will be less than those at lower temperature. In addition, the trend of these curves agrees well with early theoretical and experimental findings of Ta [6, 7, 32].
In order to facilitate observation, Table 4 lists the elastic modulus and the yielding stress of Ta at different temperatures. The elastic modulus will decrease by ~ 42.3% from 136.49 to 76.67 GPa, and the yielding stress decrease by ~ 51% from ~ 8 to ~ 4 GPa as temperature increases from 1 to 1500 K.
According to Table 4, we can further derive a parametrization of temperature dependence of the elastic modulus (E_{100}) results shown as solid line in Fig. 5a. The parametrization reads as follows:
where E_{100} is in (GPa) and T is given in (K); a = 138.07 ± 0.92111, and b = − 0.04094 ± 0.00101. This equation shows that E_{100} linearly decrease with the increasing temperature, and it is recommended for use up to the temperature from 0 to 1500 K. From Eq. (3), it can be easily obtained that E_{100} will reach 0 GPa at the temperature of T_{critical} = −a/b = 3372 K which is very close to the melting temperature of Ta [15].
For the yielding stress, the recommended parametrization is
where Y_{stress} is in (GPa) and T is given in (K); a = 7.99610 ± 0.0415, b = − 0.0039 ± 1.30126 × 10^{− 4}, and c = 7.97381 × 10^{− 7} ± 8.32307 × 10^{− 8}. From Eq. (4), it can be found that the yielding stress likely decrease with the temperature conforming a quadratic polynomial model, as given to solid line in Fig. 5b.
Dependence on Pressure
As mentioned in the “Introduction” section, extensive theoretical and experimental efforts have been made on thermoelastic properties of Ta under high pressure conditions. Different from the static methods, we adopt a dynamic method through <100> tensile loading to examine its pressure dependence of the elastic modulus of E_{100} under different hydrostatic pressure.
Figure 6 shows the curves of the elastic modulus of E_{100} versus the pressure up to 140 GPa at different temperatures from 1 to 1500 K. While all solid lines with different colors are obtained through a dynamic method at different temperatures, the dotted line with square markers is obtained through a static method by using Eq. (1) based on the values of C_{11} and C_{12} at 0 K. It is obvious that the curve at 1 K, i.e., the red solid line with circle markers, is almost overlapped with the curve obtained through a static method (the dotted line), which denotes that the dynamic method adopted in present work is applicable at high pressure up to 140 GPa.
As illustrated in Fig. 6, the elastic modulus of E_{100} at a temperature no higher than 600 K shows a downward concave section as the pressure increases from 20 to 60 GPa. Ruestes et al. [18] reported the elastic constants as a function of pressure up to 60 GPa by using MD simulations, and the results agree well with the calculated C_{11} and C_{12} in present work. In return, the calculated elastic modulus of E_{100} also shows the same trend with our results. But the calculated elastic modulus of E_{100} from DFT calculations [33] gradually increases with the increasing pressure, and no downward concave section is found in the curves. What makes this inconsistency happen? In general, the potentials used in MD simulations are obtained by fitting DFT calculations and experimental results. In this sense, DFT calculations have higher accuracy than MD method. The RaveloEAM potential [21] is constructed by introducing highpressure properties into the fitting DFT equation of state (EOS) curve of Ta single crystals. During fitting procedure, the cold curve of EOS is extended to include higherorder (cubic and quartic) terms of lattice constant, which makes MD EOS very sensitive to highorder terms of lattice constant. In other words, this inconsistency may be due to that the RaveloEAM potential could not precisely describe the EOS of Ta under the pressure from 20 to 60 GPa. On the whole, it can be concluded that the curves of elastic modulus versus pressure have a similar trend at different temperature, and the elastic modulus gradually increases with the increasing pressure over ~ 40 GPa.
Conclusions
In this paper, a MD simulation has been performed to investigate temperature and pressure dependences of the elastic properties of Ta single crystals through <100> tensile loading. At first, we made a comparative study on two types of EAM potentials, including ZhouEAM and RaveloEAM, in terms of the elastic properties of Ta at 0 K and different hydrostatic pressures. The results show that the RaveloEAM potential behaves better than ZhouEAM potential under different pressures. Then, MD simulations on tensile behaviors of Ta single crystals are carried out based on the RaveloEAM potential. The observations show that Ta will experience a BCCFCC phase transition before fracture under <100> tensile loading, and the model size and strain rate have no obvious influence on tensile behaviors of Ta single crystals. Moreover, the elastic modulus of E_{100} will linearly decrease from ~ 136 to ~ 79 GPa with the increasing temperature from 1 to 1500 K, and the yielding stress decrease from ~ 8 to ~ 4 GPa with the increasing temperature, conforming a quadratic polynomial formula. Finally, the pressure dependence of the elastic properties is performed from 0 to 140 GPa, and the observations show that the elastic modulus increases with the increasing pressure overall. The results from MD simulations also show that the RaveloEAM potential behaves well at higher pressure and the formula for calculation of E_{100} using C_{11} and C_{12} at the pressure lower than 140 GPa.
Change history
24 May 2018
In the original publication of this article [1] the third author was typesetted by mistake.
Abbreviations
 BCC:

Bodycentered cubic
 DAC:

Diamondanvil cell
 DFT:

Density functional theory
 EAM:

Embeddedatom method
 EFS:

Extended FinnisSinclair
 EOS:

Equation of state
 FCC:

Facecenteredcubic
 LAMMPS:

Largescale atomic/molecular massively parallel simulator
 MD:

Molecular dynamics
 NPT:

Isothermalisobaric ensemble
 NVT:

Canonical ensemble
 OVITO:

Open Visualization Tool
 PBC:

Periodic boundary conditions
 Ta:

Tantalum
References
 1.
Cynn H, Yoo CS (1999) Equation of state of tantalum to 174 GPa. Phys Rev B Condensed Matter 59(13):8526–8529
 2.
Dewaele A et al (2010) High melting points of tantalum in a laserheated diamond anvil cell. Phys Rev Lett 104(25):255701
 3.
Burakovsky L et al (2010) Highpressurehightemperature polymorphism in ta: resolving an ongoing experimental controversy. Phys Rev Lett 104(25):255702
 4.
FischerCripps AC (2006) Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf Coat Technol 200(14):4153–4165
 5.
Dewaele A, Loubeyre P (2005) Mechanical properties of tantalum under high pressure. Phys Rev B 72(13):4106
 6.
Škoro GP et al (2011) Dynamic Young's moduli of tungsten and tantalum at high temperature and stress. J Nucl Mater 409(1):40–46
 7.
Škoro GP et al (2012) Yield strength of molybdenum, tantalum and tungsten at high strain rates and very high temperatures. J Nucl Mater 426(1–3):45–51
 8.
Shigeaki O (2009) Firstprinciples molecular dynamics calculations of the equation of state for tantalum. Int J Mol Sci 10(10):4342–4351
 9.
Wu JH et al (2011) Firstprinciples highpressure elastic and thermodynamic properties of tantalum. Int J Modern Phys B 25(10):1393–1407
 10.
Gu JB et al (2016) Highpressure structure and elastic properties of tantalum single crystal: first principles investigation. Chin Phys B 25(12):350–356
 11.
Crowhurst JC et al (2016) Yielding of tantalum at strain rates up to 109 s−1. Appl Phys Lett 109(9):282–1180
 12.
Tramontina DR et al (2017) Simulation of tantalum nanocrystals under shockwave loading: Dislocations and twinning. AIP Conference Proceedings 1793: 070002
 13.
Huang C et al (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation of BCC Ta with coherent twin boundaries under nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A 700:609–616
 14.
Huang C et al (2017) Investigation of interaction between dislocation loop and coherent twin boundary in bcc ta film during nanoindentation. Nano 7(11):375
 15.
Liu ZL et al (2008) Thermal equation of state, and melting and thermoelastic properties of bcc tantalum from molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem Solids 69(11):2833–2840
 16.
Tramontina D et al (2014) Orientationdependent response of defective Tantalum single crystals. Comput Mater Sci 90(8):82–88
 17.
Tramontina D et al (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations of shockinduced plasticity in tantalum. High Energy Density Phys 10(1):9–15
 18.
Ruestes CJ et al (2014) Atomistic simulation of tantalum nanoindentation: effects of indenter diameter, penetration velocity, and interatomic potentials on defect mechanisms and evolution. Mater Sci Eng A 613(11):390–403
 19.
Plimpton S Fast parallel algorithms for shortrange molecular dynamics. 1995: Academic Press Professional, Inc. 1–19
 20.
Zhou XW et al (2004) Misfitenergyincreasing dislocations in vapordeposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers. Phys Rev B 69(14):1124–1133
 21.
Ravelo R et al (2013) Shockinduced plasticity in tantalum single crystals: interatomic potentials and largescale moleculardynamics simulations. Physical Review B 88(13):134101
 22.
Dowling NE (1999) Mechanical behavior of materials : engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue. Second Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
 23.
Gao G et al (2006) Elastic constants of diamond from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Condens Matter 18(32):S1737
 24.
Nellis WJ et al (2003) Equationofstate measurements for aluminum, copper, and tantalum in the pressure range 80–440 GPa (0.8–4.4 Mbar). J Appl Phys 93(1):304–310
 25.
Gülseren O, Cohen RE (2002) High pressure thermoelasticity of bodycentered cubic tantalum. Phys Rev B 65(6):064103
 26.
Tang MX et al (2017) Loadingpath dependent deformation of nanocrystalline ta under single and doubleshock, and quasiisentropic compression. J Appl Phys 121(11):115901
 27.
Pan Z et al (2008) Tensile properties of nanocrystalline tantalum from molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Mater 56(14):3470–3480
 28.
Chang L et al (2017) Molecular dynamics study of strain rate effects on tensile behavior of single crystal titanium nanowire. Comput Mater Sci 128:348–358
 29.
Wang WD et al (2016) Understanding the tensile behaviors of ultrathin ZnO nanowires via molecular dynamics simulations. AIP Adv 6(3):26–33
 30.
Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITOthe Open Visualization Tool. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18(6):2154–2162
 31.
Wang WD et al (2013) Molecular dynamics study on temperature and strain rate dependences of mechanical tensile properties of ultrathin nickel nanowires. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23(11):3353–3361
 32.
Liu ZL et al (2008) Molecular dynamics simulations of the melting curve of tantalum under pressure. Phys Rev B 77(2):4103
 33.
Liu ZL et al (2011) FPLAPW calculations of structural and elastic properties of tantalum under high pressure. Phys Status Solidi 248(1):175–180
 34.
Stewart WL et al (1977) Effect of hydrogen on the temperature dependence of the elastic constants of tantalum single crystals. J Appl Phys 48(1):75–81
Funding
We acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51205302) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (grant no. 2017JM5003).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
The analysis of the simulation results was mainly carried out by WL and WW. The simulation processes were mainly conducted by WL and KL. Some fairly helpful proposals about the construction of models were made by KF and DZ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Weidong Wang.
Ethics declarations
Authors’ Information
WL is an associate professor and a Ph.D. degree holder specializing in the investigation of composite materials. KL is a graduate student major in the study of mechanical properties of low dimensional materials. KF and DZ are both associate professors and Ph.D. degree holders specializing in the investigation of MEMS technology. WW is a full professor and a Ph.D. degree holder specializing in the investigation of MEMS&NEMS technologies.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167101825764.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Li, K., Fan, K. et al. Temperature and Pressure Dependences of the Elastic Properties of Tantalum Single Crystals Under <100> Tensile Loading: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 118 (2018) doi:10.1186/s1167101825261
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Tantalum single crystals
 Elastic properties
 Pressure dependence
 Temperature dependence
 MD simulations
 Tensile loading