Skip to main content

Functionalized Nano-adsorbent for Affinity Separation of Proteins


Thiol-functionalized silica nanospheres (SiO2-SH NSs) with an average diameter of 460 nm were synthesized through a hydrothermal route. Subsequently, the prepared SiO2-SH NSs were modified by SnO2 quantum dots to afford SnO2/SiO2 composite NSs possessing obvious fluorescence, which could be used to trace the target protein. The SnO2/SiO2 NSs were further modified by reduced glutathione (GSH) to obtain SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs, which can specifically separate glutathione S-transferase-tagged (GST-tagged) protein. Moreover, the peroxidase activity of glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) separated from SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs in vitro was evaluated. Results show that the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs exhibit negligible nonspecific adsorption, high concentration of protein binding (7.4 mg/g), and good reused properties. In the meantime, the GST-tagged GPX3 separated by these NSs can retain its redox state and peroxidase activity. Therefore, the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs might find promising application in the rapid separation and purification of GST-tagged proteins.


The easy separation and purification of proteins are very important in xenobiotic biotransformation, drug metabolism, biosynthesis of prostaglandins and steroid hormones, and degradation of aromatic amino acids [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The separated proteins can be used for antigen and vaccine production, molecular immunology and structural, and biochemical and cell biological studies. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) represents a major group of detoxification isoenzymes which can be used in GST gene fusion system and medicine effect targeting field or as tumor markers [7, 8]. Various methods such as precipitation, chromatography, ultrafiltration, and dialysis are currently available for purifying various proteins, and in particular, affinity separation based on the natural biological affinity between biological macromolecules and complementary ligands is of extraordinary significance [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The successful production and purification of full-length, soluble, and natural fusion proteins, however, are still retarded by various obstacles such as the need for pretreatment to remove the cell debris and colloid contaminants, a relatively long operation time, and protein solubility. These drawbacks, fortunately, could be overcame by applying nanomaterials to assist the separation and purification of the target proteins [15,16,17,18,19]. For example, magnetic SiO2-NiO nanocomposite is capable of separating His-tagged proteins [20]. Nanomaterials, nevertheless, still have short legs in the separation of various proteins because they are often inactive to visualization and fluorescence techniques which can be used as sensitive biomolecular and medical diagnostic tools to combat biological warfare [21,22,23]. In this sense, it is imperative to find nanomaterials with fluorescent responses so as to promote their application in the separation and purification of recombinant protein like glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3).

We pay particular attention to nanoscale SnO2 quantum dots (QDs), because, as an n-type wide-bandgap (3.6 eV) semiconductor with good chemical stability and biocompatibility, SnO2 exhibits optical absorbance in visible spectral region. Herein, we establish a smart pathway to introduce fluorescent SnO2 QDs onto the surface of silica nanospheres (NSs), hoping to develop a desired SnO2/SiO2 nanostructure with potential application in the separation and purification of GST-tagged proteins. Firstly, thiol-functionalized silica nanospheres (SiO2-SH NSs) were prepared through a hydrothermal route. Resultant SiO2-SH NSs were compounded with SnO2 quantum dots to afford SiO2/SnO2 composite NSs possessing obvious fluorescence absorption. The SiO2/SnO2 NSs were further modified by reduced glutathione (GSH) to obtain SiO2/SnO2-GSH NSs with potential for the affinity separation of GST-tagged protein. The ability and the peroxidase activity of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs in separating GST-tagged proteins were evaluated by SDS-PAGE analysis.


Material and Methods

Hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), tin (IV) chloride (SnCl4), triethylamine (TEA), and isopropanol were provided by Tianjin Kermel Chemicals Reagent Company (Tianjin, China). AgNO3 was purchased from Tianjin Fuchen Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). 3-Mercaptopropyl-trimethoxysilane (MPS) was offered by Alfa-Aesar (Shanghai, China). Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) was supplied by Tianjin Fuchen Chemicals (Tianjin, China). Dihydronicotinamide adenine dinuclectide phosphate (NADPH), thioredoxin, and thioredoxin reductase were obtained from Sigma (Beijing, China). Glutathione Sepharose 4B (Stockholm, USA) was from GE Healthcare. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was available from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Inalco SPA, Italy). All chemical reagents were of analytical reagent and used without any further purification.

Preparation of SnO2 Quantum Dots

In a typical synthesis [24], 3.5 g SnCl4·5H2O was added into 50 mL H2O, then 5 mL ammonia was added into the solution under stirring. Subsequently, the precipitation obtained by centrifugation was washed with deionized water for several times to remove the excessive Cl ions. Thirty milliliters of deionized water was added into the obtained precipitate, and then, the pH of the solution was adjusted to be 12 by 2 mol/L ammonia. The mixed solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, sealed and heated at 150 °C for 24 h. Upon completion of heating, the mixed solution was cooled, centrifuged, and fully washed with ethanol-isopropanol (volume ratio 1:1) to obtain SnO2 QDs.

Preparation of SnO2/SiO2-SH NSs

In a typical synthesis, 0.2 g SnO2 QDs and 0.09 g CTAB were dissolved in the mixed solvent of H2O (42.5 mL) and absolute alcohol (7 mL) under magnetic stirring (200 G, r = 180 mm). Into resultant solution was added 2.7 mL TEA under additional 20 min of stirring. The mixed solution was heated at 60 °C for 5 h while 3.5 mL TEOS and 0.35 mL of MPS were slowly dropped, followed by centrifuging (12,800 G, r = 180 mm) and fully washing with HCl-ethanol (30 mL) and water (30 mL) to obtain SnO2/SiO2-SH NSs for three times, which was dispersed in water (0.12 g/mL).

Surface Modification of SnO2/SiO2-SH NSs

Four milliliters of 0.12 g/mL SnO2/SiO2-SH NSs was washed with PBS (0.01 mol/L, pH = 7.4) for three times. These SnO2/SiO2-SH NSs were added into 30 mL 16.7 mg/mL GSH solution and oscillated at 37 °C for 24 h (120 rev/min) with a constant temperature oscillator. At the end of oscillation, the mixed solution was centrifuged to provide SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs; then, the precipitate was fully washed with 30 mL PBS (0.01 mol/L, pH = 7.4) for three times to remove excessive GSH via physical adsorption, thereby affording desired SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. The resultant SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs were added into alcohol (25%, v/v) and stored at 4 °C.

Separation of GST-Tagged Proteins

The mixed proteins were collected from the cell lysate of Escherichia coli, which is by water lysis (concentration 0.01 mol/L, pH 7.4). For in vitro protein expression, the protein region containing the coding sequence of glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3, amino acids 37–206), Open stomata 1 (OST1), and ABA insensitive 2 (ABI2, amino acids 100–423) in Arabidopsis thaliana was cloned and inserted in frame into the plasmid pGEX-6p1 (GPX3 was used as control). pGEX-GPX3, pGEX-OST1, and pGEX-ABI2 constructs were introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. The recombinant GST-tagged proteins were purified using Glutathione Sepharose 4B and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. The primers used for cloning the genes were as follows: for GPX3, forward primer, 5′- GATGGATCCTCGCCATCGACGGTGGAACAA-3′; reverse primer, 5′- CACCTCGAGTCAAGCAGATGCCAATAGCTT-3′; for OST1, forward primer, 5′- GCCGAATTCATGGATCGACCAGCAGTGA-3′; reverse primer, 5′- CCCGTCGACTCACATTGCGTACACAATC-3′; for ABI2, forward primer, 5′- GCGGAATTCGAGAGTAGAAGTCTGTTTG-3′; reverse primer, 5′- GCGCTCGAGTCAATTCAAGGATTTGCTC-3′.

After being washed with PBS solution (0.01 mol/L, pH = 7.4), the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs were directly introduced into 1000 μL E. coli lysate and shaken at 4 °C for 2 h (rotation speed: 90 rev/min) to allow the SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs to capture GST-tagged proteins. Upon completion of shaking, these NSs were isolated from the solution by centrifugation and fully washed with PBS solution to remove any residual uncaptured proteins. The GST-tagged protein-bound SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs were washed with 300 μL and 0.5 mol/L GSH solution for three times to disassociate GST-tagged proteins from their surface. Separately collected protein solutions were detected by sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The concentration of the separated proteins was determined by BCA protein Assay Kit. The SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs can be reused to separate the target proteins for several times by the same method.

Measurement of Glutathione Peroxidase Activity

The separated GPX3 activity was measured by the spectrometric determination of NADPH consumption at 340 nm as described by Delaunay et al. [25]. The GST tag was cut off by PreScission protease from GST-tagged GPX3, and then, the GPX3 was used for activity analysis. Firstly, 98 μL reaction buffer solution (including 100 mmol/L Tris-Cl, 0.3 mmol/L NADPH, 1.34 μmol/L thioredoxin, and 0.18 μmol/L thioredoxin reductase from E. coli lysate) was added into a tube; after mixing completely, 1.35 μmol purified GPX3 was added into the resultant reaction buffer solution. Then, the mixed solution was added into 2 μL H2O2 (5 mmol/L) to initiate the reaction and NADPH consumption at 340 nm was collected by the spectrometric determination.

Analysis of Redox States of Purified GPX3

The GST tag was cut off from GST-tagged GPX3 by PreScission protease. The separated GPX3 was treated with 5 mmol/L H2O2 and 1 mmol/L DTT for 10 min to change the redox states of the purified GPX3. The resultant GPX3 was used for in vitro analysis of redox states. Extracts were evaluated by nonreducing 15% SDS-PAGE gel.


The morphology and composition of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM 5600LV, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’ Pert Philips, Holland), and fluorescence spectrometer (FL, FluoroSENS, Britain, at the excitation wavelength of 260 nm). The separated GST-tagged proteins were detected with sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, Power PAC 300, China), with the preconcentration voltage of 70 V and the separation voltage of 120 V. The constant temperature oscillator was from Shanghai ChemStar Instruments, Co., Ltd. (ATS-03M2R, China). The concentration of the separated proteins was determined by BCA protein Assay Kit (Beijing CoWin Biotech, China).

Results and Discussion

TEM, SEM, XRD, and Fluorescent Analyses of SnO2 QDs and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs

 Figure 1 gives the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images and XRD pattern of the synthesized SnO2 QDs. It can be seen that the synthesized SnO2 QDs are of spherical shape and have an average diameter of 5 nm, which exhibits a narrow particle size distribution (Fig. 1a), and their lattice spacing of (110) plane is 0.29 nm (Fig. 1b). The well-resolved lattice image demonstrates that the prepared SnO2 QDs have a highly ordered crystalline structure. Corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern of SnO2 QDs (Fig. 1c) can be indexed to a single Cassiterite phase, which is consistent with the relevant XRD pattern (Fig. 1d). Namely, the characteristic peaks at 2 theta = 26.6° (110), 33.9° (101), 38.0° (200), 51.8° (211), 65.9° (301), and 78.7° (321) are consistent with the standard XRD data of Cassiterite SnO2 (JCPDS card no. 41-1445). Besides, the intense XRD peaks indicate that the prepared SnO2 QDs are well crystallized, and the absence of other characteristic peaks suggests that they do not contain hematite or hydroxide impurities.

Fig. 1

TEM (a), HRTEM (b) images, selected area electron diffraction pattern (c) and XRD pattern (d) of prepared SnO2 QDs

 Figure 2 gives the SEM and TEM images of SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. It can be seen that the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs are of a spherical shape and have an average diameter of about 430 nm, and their surface seems to be somewhat rough (Fig. 2a, b). In the meantime, it can be seen that the SnO2 QDs (about 5–15 nm) are modified on the surface of SiO2 microspheres (Fig. 2c, d), which is consistent with the corresponding SEM images. It is indicated that the SnO2 and silica NSs have been aggregated.

Fig. 2

SEM (a, b) and TEM (c, d) images of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs

Figure 3a gives the XRD pattern of the synthesized SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. The major peaks at 2 theta = 110°, 101°, 200°, 211°, 301°, and 321° are consistent with those of SnO2 (Fig. 1d). Besides, SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs show an intense characteristic peak of amorphous silica around 23° (JCPDS card no. 76-0933), which indicates that SnO2 possessing visible light response has been successfully introduced onto the surface of SiO2 NSs. Figure 3b shows the fluorescent spectrum of SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs at 368 nm. It can be seen that SnO2/SiO2-GSH displays intense fluorescent emission, which is attributed to oxygen vacancies of SnO2. Figure 3c gives the fluorescence imaging of SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs when these NSs are used to separate GST-tagged GPX3 in E. coil lysate. It can be seen that there are obvious green fluorescence where the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs are used. It indicates that SnO2 was modified on the surface of SiO2 and the SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs have good fluorescence properties.

Fig. 3

XRD pattern (a), fluorescence spectrum (b), and fluorescence imaging (c) of prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs

SDS-PAGE Analysis

To estimate the ability of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs in separating GST-tagged proteins, we conducted SDS-PAGE analysis. Figure 4 shows the SDS-PAGE analysis result of the GST-tagged GPX3 separated by SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. It can be seen that the SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs can efficiently enrich target proteins from E. coli lysate, and in particular, the quantity of the disassociated proteins tends to increase with incremental concentration of GSH in the range of 10–100 mmol/L (lanes 3–6 in Fig. 4a). It is clear that the target proteins can be separated specifically by the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs from the E. coli lysate and there was hardly any nonspecific.

Fig. 4

SDS-PAGE analysis of purified GST-tagged proteins separated by SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs. a Lane 1, marker; lane 2, E. coli lysate; lanes 3–6 refer to the fractions washed off from the SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs with different concentrations of GSH solution (lane 1, 10 mmol/L; lane 2, 20 mmol/L; lane 3, 50 mmol/L; lane 4, 100 mmol/L). b Lane 1, marker; lane 2, E. coli lysate; lane 3, 1st separation; lane 4, 2nd separation; lane 5, 3rd separation; and lane 6, the fractions washed off from the Glutathione Sepharose 4B

In order to investigate the reused properties of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs, we repeatedly used them to separate GST-tagged GPX3. As shown in Fig. 4b (lane 1 refers to the marker, lane 2 refers to GST-GPX3-contained E. coli lysate, lane 3 refers to 1st separation, lane 4 refers to 2nd separation, lane 5 refers to 3rd separation, and lane 6 refers to the fractions washed off from Glutathione Sepharose 4B), the synthesized SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs exhibit special selectivity towards GST-tagged GPX3 extracted from E. coli lysate, and their specificity and affinity remain unaffected after three cycles of repeat separation.

To test the universality of the synthesized SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs for purifying GST-tagged proteins, we selected three kinds of GST-tagged proteins (GST-tagged GPX3, GST-tagged OST1, and GST-tagged ABI2) to conduct experiments. As shown in Fig. 5, GST-tagged GPX3, OST1, and ABI2 proteins can be separated specifically by SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs from the E. coli lysate (lanes 3, 6, 9); then, we can get both GPX3 (cut off the GST tag from SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs binding GST-tagged GPX3) and GST tag eluted from SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs (lane 13, the GPX3; lane 14, the GST tag), which has a similar effect with Glutathione Sepharose 4B (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, 12). The concentrations of purified proteins by SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs were 7.4 mg/g (GST-tagged GPX3), 7.1 mg/g (GST-tagged OST1), and 6.8 mg/g (GST-tagged ABI2), which indicate that SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs are good to purify GST-tagged proteins from the E. coli lysate. In order to compare the binding capacity between the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs and the other material, Glutathione Sepharose 4B (purchased in Stockholm, USA) was used as comparison experiment material. The total proteins purified by Glutathione Sepharose 4B were 7.1 mg/mL (GST-tagged GPX3), 6.9 mg/mL (GST-tagged OST1), and 5.6 mg/mL (GST-tagged ABI2), respectively. It can be seen that the binding capacity of the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs is higher than that of commodity 4B.

Fig. 5

SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified recombinant GPX3, OST1, and ABI2 proteins. Lanes 1, 4, and 7, E. coli lysate; lanes 2, 5, and 8, the proteins eluted from commercial Glutathione Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare, USA); lanes 3, 6, and 9, the proteins eluted from SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs; lane 10, the marker; lanes 11 and 13, GPX3 obtained after the GST tag is cut off from Glutathione Sepharose 4B bound GST-GPX3 and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs bound GST-tagged GPX3; lanes 12 and 14, GST tag eluted from Glutathione Sepharose 4B and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs

Analysis of Redox State and Peroxidase Activity of GST-Tagged GPX3

In order to analyze the redox state and activity of GST-tagged GPX3 separated by the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs, we cut off the GST tag to obtain the separated GPX3. Figure 6a shows given in vitro assays of GPX3 redox state (corresponding to a representative gel from three independent experiments). Lanes 1 and 2 refer to GPX3 obtained after the GST tag is cut off from Glutathione Sepharose 4B bound GST-tagged GPX3 (lane 1 is the oxidized GPX3 and lane 2 is the reduced GPX3); lanes 3 and 4 refer to GPX3 obtained after the GST tag is cut off from SnO2/SiO2-GSH bound GST-tagged GPX3 (lane 3 is the oxidized GPX3 and lane 4 is the reduced GPX3); lane 5 refers to the marker. As shown in Fig. 6a, the purified GPX3 separated from Glutathione Sepharose 4B (lanes 1 and 2) and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs (lanes 3 and 4) have the oxidized and reduced states, and the reduced GPX3 migrates more slowly than the oxidized counterpart. This is well consistent with our previous findings that GPX3 is present in oxidized and reduced states in vitro, and its reduced and oxidized forms can be separated as a result of modification of the reduced Cys residues [26,27,28].

Fig. 6

a In vitro assays of GPX3 redox state: lanes 1 and 3 (the oxidized GPX3) and 2 and 4 (the reduced GPX3) refer to GPX3 obtained after the GST tag is cut off from Glutathione Sepharose 4B and SnO2/SiO2-GSH bound GST-tagged GPX3, respectively; lane 5, marker. b Assays of peroxidase activity of GPX3

Figure 6b shows the assays of peroxidase activity of GPX3: line GPX3*, complete assay of the purified GPX3 in the presence of Glutathione Sepharose 4B, thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase, NADPH, and H2O2; line GPX3, complete reaction among SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs separated GPX3, thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase, NADPH, and H2O2; line No GPX3, complete reaction in the absence of GPX3; and line No Trx, complete reaction in the absence of thioredoxin. Figure 6b shows the glutathione peroxidase activity of the purified GPX3 separated from Glutathione Sepharose 4B and SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs in vitro. It can be seen that, with thioredoxin as the substrate, the purified GPX3 exhibits significant peroxidase activity, which indicates that the GPX3 separated from SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs is existent in the natural state.


A facile method is established to fabricate silica-protected SnO2 QD nanospheres (SnO2/SiO2 NSs). The SnO2/SiO2 NSs are further modified by glutathione to afford SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs for the affinity separation of glutathione S-transferase-tagged (GST-tagged) recombinant protein. Findings indicate that, in terms of the ability to separate GST-tagged GPX3, GST-tagged LOV, and GST-tagged ABI2, the prepared SiO2/SiO2-GSH NSs exhibit specific separation, high concentration of protein binding, and good reused properties. Besides, the GPX3 separated from the GST-tagged GPX3 retains its redox states in vitro and GPX activity as well, which means that the prepared SnO2/SiO2-GSH NSs might have a promising potential for the rapid separation and purification of GST-tagged proteins.



ABA insensitive 2


Hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide




Peroxidase activity of glutathione peroxidase 3


Reduced glutathione


Glutathione S-transferase-tagged




Dihydronicotinamide adenine dinuclectide phosphate


Open stomata 1


Quantum dots


Sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis


Scanning electron microscopy

SiO2-SH NSs:

Thiol-functionalized silica nanospheres

SnCl4 :

Tin (IV) chloride




Transmission electron microscopy


Tetraethyl orthosilicate


X-ray diffraction


  1. 1.

    Seto H, Ogata Y, Murakami T, Hoshino Y, Miura Y (2012) Selective protein separation using siliceous materials with a trimethoxysilane-containing glycopolymer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vilt ME, Ho WSW (2010) Selective separation of cephalexin from multiple component mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:12022–12030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu C, Monson CF, Yang T, Pace H, Cremer PS (2011) Protein separation by electrophoretic-electroosmotic focusing on supported lipid bilayers. Anal Chem 83:7876–7880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Steppert P, Burgstaller D, Klausberge M, Berger E, Aguilar PP, Schneider TA, Kramberqer P, Tover A, Nöbauer K, Razzazi-Fazeli E, Junqbauer A (2016) Purification of HIV-1 gag virus-like particles and separation of other extracellular particles. J Chromatogr A 1455:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yoshimatsu K, Yamazaki T, Hoshino Y, Rose PE, Epstein LF, Miranda LP, Tagari P, Beierle JM, Yonamine Y, Shea KJ, Miura Y (2014) Epitope discovery for a synthetic polymer nanoparticle: a new strategy for developing a peptide tag. J Am Chem Soc 136:1194–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yu H, Arata Y, Yonamine Y, Lee SH, Yamasaki A, Tsuhara R, Yano K, Shea KJ, Miura Y (2015) Preparation of nanogel-immobilized porous gel beads for affinity separation of proteins: fusion of nano and micro gel materials. Polym J 47:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Park SM, Jung HY, Chung KC, Rhim H, Park JH, Kim J (2002) Stress-induced aggregation profiles of GST-alpha-synuclein fusion proteins: role of the C-terminal acidic tail of alpha-synuclein in protein thermosolubility and stability. Biochemistry 41:4137–4146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fujikawa Y, Urano Y, Komatsu T, Hanaoka K, Kojima H, Terai T, Inoue H, Nagano T (2008) Design and synthesis of highly sensitive fluorogenic substrates for glutathione S-transferase and application for activity imaging in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 130:14533–14543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu CM, Monson CF, Yang TL, Pace H, Cremer PS (2011) Protein separation by electrophoretic-electroosmotic focusing on supported lipid bilayers. Anal Chem 83:7876–7880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cao N, Zou XY, Huang YQ, Zhao YB (2015) Preparation of NiFe2O4 architectures for affinity separation of histidine-tagged proteins. Mater Lett 144:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ying LQ, Branchaud BP (2011) Purification of tetracysteine-tagged proteins by affinity chromatography using a non-fluorescent, photochemically stable bisarsenical affinity ligand. Bioconjug Chem 22:987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li JL, Yang YS, Mao Z, Huang WJ, Qiu T, Wu QZ (2016) Enhanced resolution of DNA separation using agarose gel electrophoresis doped with graphene oxide. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:404–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee SH, Yu H, Randall A, Zeng Z, Baldi P, Doong RA, Shea KJ (2012) Engineered synthetic polymer nanoparticles as IgG affinity ligands. J Am Chem Soc 134:15765–15772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yu H, Lee H, Miura Y (2014) Interaction between synthetic particles and biomacromolecules: fundamental study of nonspecific interaction and design of nanoparticles that recognize target molecules. Polym J 46:537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Oh BK, Park S, Millstone JE, Lee SW, Lee KB, Mirkin CA (2006) Separation of tricomponent protein mixtures with triblock nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 128:11825–11829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xu F, Geiger JH, Baker GL, Bruening ML (2011) Polymer brush-modified magnetic nanoparticles for His-tagged protein purification. Langmuir 27:3106–3112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sahu SK, Chakrabarty A, Bhattacharya D, Ghosh SK, Pramanik PJ (2011) Single step surface modification of highly stable magnetic nanoparticles for purification of His-tag proteins. Nanopart Res 13:2475–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Goyal G, Lee YB, Darvish A, Ahn CW, Kim MJ (2016) Hydrophilic and size-controlled graphene nanopores for protein detection. Nanotechnology 27:495301–495312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vereshchaqina TA, Fedorchak MA, Sharonova OM, Fomenko EV, Shishkina NN, Zhizhaev AM, Kudryavtsev AN, Frank LA, Anshits AG (2016) Ni2+-zeolite/ferrosphere and Ni2+-silica/ferrosphere beads for magnetic affinity separation of histidine-tagged proteins. Dalton Trans 45:1582–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kim BJ, Piao YZ, Lee N, Park YI, Lee IH, Lee JH, Paik SR, Hyeon T (2010) Magnetic nanocomposite spheres decorated with NiO nanoparticles for a magnetically recyclable protein separation system. Adv Mater 22:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Johnsson N, Johnsson K (2007) Chemical tools for biomolecular imaging. ACS Chem Biol 2:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mathieu LV, Ludovic SL, Olivier D (2008) Reduction of self-quenching in fluorescent silica-coated silver nanoparticles. Plasmonics 3:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang J, You M, Zhu G, Shukoor MI, Chen Z, Zhao Z, Altman MB, Yuan Q, Zhu Z, Chen Y, Huang CZ, Tan W (2013) Photosensitizer-gold nanorod composite for targeted multimodal therapy. Small 9:3678–3684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Z, Shen W, Wang Z, Xiang X, Zu X, Wei Q, Wang L (2009) Direct formation of SiO2/SnO2 composite nanoparticles with high surface area and high thermal stability by sol-gel-hydrothermal process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 49:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Delaunay A, Pflieger D, Barrault M, Vinh J, Toledano MB (2002) A thiol peroxidase is an H2O2 receptor and redox-transducer in gene activation. Cell 111:471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miao Y, Lv D, Wang P, Wang XC, Chen J, Miao C, Song CP (2006) An Arabidopsis glutathione peroxidase functions as both a redox transducer and a scavenger in abscisic acid and drought stress responses. Plant Cell 18:2749–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Inaba K, Ito K (2002) Paradoxical redox properties of DsbB and DsbA in the protein disulfide-introducing reaction cascade. EMBO J 21:2646–2654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kishigami S, Akiyama Y, Ito K (1995) Redox states of DsbA in the periplasm of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 364:55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Scientific Research Fund Project of Henan University of China (grant no. 2015YBZR032), The project of scientific and technological breakthrough in Jiyuan of China (grant No. 17022011); The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21571051); Major science and technology project in Henan province of China (grant No.181100310600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 9117002), Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 program, grant no. 2012CB114301), and Open Fund of Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Remediation of Heavy Metal polluted Soil of Henan Province.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Author information




XYZ, FBY, XS, and MMQ performed the design, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. YBZ and ZJZ guided the idea and the simulations and checked the figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanbao Zhao or Zhijun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, X., Yang, F., Sun, X. et al. Functionalized Nano-adsorbent for Affinity Separation of Proteins. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 165 (2018).

Download citation


  • Silica nanospheres
  • SnO2
  • Affinity separation
  • Peroxidase activity
  • Redox state