 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Pseudospin Dependent OneWay Transmission in GrapheneBased Topological Plasmonic Crystals
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 13, Article number: 113 (2018)
Abstract
Originating from the investigation of condensed matter states, the concept of quantum Hall effect and quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) has recently been expanded to other field of physics and engineering, e.g., photonics and phononics, giving rise to strikingly unconventional edge modes immune to scattering. Here, we present the plasmonic analog of QSHE in graphene plasmonic crystal (GPC) in midinfrared frequencies. The band inversion occurs when deforming the honeycomb lattice GPCs, which further leads to the topological band gaps and pseudospin features of the edge states. By overlapping the band gaps with different topologies, we numerically simulated the pseudospindependent oneway propagation of edge states. The designed GPC may find potential applications in the fields of topological plasmonics and trigger the exploration of the technique of the pseudospin multiplexing in highdensity nanophotonic integrated circuits.
Background
Photonic topological insulators [1,2,3,4], optical materials of a nontrivial topological phase that prohibit light transmission in their interiors but allow propagation along their edges, have been studied intensively following the discovery of quantum Hall effect (QHE) in condensed matter. A key manifestation of topological physics is the presence of edge states which are robust against structural defects or local disorders. Particularly, by utilizing the bulkedge correspondence [5, 6], one may investigate different topological phases by probing edge states or edge topological invariants. In recent years, topological edge states have been predicted and observed in many photonic topological band gap systems, such as gyromagnetic photonic crystals [7,8,9], bianisotropicbased photonic topological insulators [10, 11], coupled waveguide networks [12, 13], and Floquet photonic lattices [14, 15], where various physical mechanisms are proposed to provide topological protection. Notably, a double Dirac cone was opened to obtain a topologically nontrivial band gap in a wellknown honeycomb lattice photonic crystal that preserves pseudo timereversal symmetry, which gives rise to pseudospindependent unidirectional transmission of edge states [16, 17]. Besides the photonic systems, pseudospindependent edge states in phononic systems have been explored [18,19,20]. However, the analogy in the plasmonic nanostructures has not yet been reported, which is due to the huge ohmic loss of the plasmons propagating along the traditional plasmonic materials such as Au and Ag.
Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) [21], elementary excitations coupled by photons and freeelectron oscillations at an interface between a metal and a dielectric, are regarded as a promising physical mechanism to circumvent the diffraction limitation and to advance the miniaturization of the devices. Iurov et al. explored the back action and hybridization of the plasmon modes and found the induced optical polarization by Dirac electrons in graphene [22]. Memmi et al. reported the strong coupling between SPPs and molecular vibrations [23]. While commonly used noble metals such as gold and silver exhibit plasmonic properties mostly in the visible and nearinfrared region of the spectrum, graphene has recently emerged as a promising alternative which is able to extend the field of plasmonics to infrared and terahertz (THz) wavelengths. More importantly, in contrast to noble metals, graphene plasmons can be dynamically tuned via electrostatic biasing [24, 25], which enables a new generation of reconfigurable plasmonic devices. Furthermore, SPPs excited in highquality graphene can reach remarkably long intrinsic relaxation times and provide unprecedented levels of field confinement [26]. These extraordinary properties make graphene an ideal candidate to the allintegrated topological plasmonic components. Very recently, Jin et al. realized the topologically protected oneway edge plasmons in a periodically patterned monolayer graphene, where the band topology of graphene plasmons under a timereversalbreaking magnetic field was studied in detail [27]. And Pan et al. demonstrated the substantial nonreciprocal behavior at the superlattice junctions under moderate static magnetic fields, leading to the emergence of topologically protected edge states and localized bulk modes [28].
In this work, we theoretically explore the topological properties of twodimensional (2D) graphene plasmonic crystals (GPCs) constructed by periodically arranged graphene nanodisks. Dirac cones at the Brillouin zone (BZ) corners are folded to a double Dirac cone at the BZ center by utilizing the zone folding mechanism. In order to obtain topological band gaps, we take further deformations on honeycomb lattice. By shrinking or expanding the graphene nanodisks, the double Dirac cone is opened and the band inversion occurs between pseudospin dipole and quadrupole modes, which further leads to topological phase transition between nontrivial and trivial states. Furthermore, oneway propagation of edge states is numerically simulated along an interface constructed by the trivial and nontrivial GPCs, which further demonstrates the pseudospin characteristics and topological robustness of our designed plasmonic crystals.
Methods
We investigate the band topology of SPPs in a 2D plasmonic crystal of an array of periodically arranged graphene nanodisks surrounded by the same sheet of graphene with different chemical potential as shown in Fig. 1a. The lattice constant a = 40 nm, μ_{c1}, and r are the chemical potential and radii of the graphene nanodisks; μ_{c2} denotes the chemical potential of the surrounding graphene. By solving the Maxwells equations with boundary conditions, we obtain the dispersion relation for transverse magnetic (TM)polarized SPP modes supported on the graphene layer surrounding by air and silica [29]:
Here, ε_{0} is the vacuum permittivity of free space, k_{0} = 2π/λ is the wave number in free space, and λ is the operating wavelength in vacuum. In the midinfrared region, the dielectric constants of air and silica corresponding to super and substrates are assumed to be ε_{Air} = 1 and ε_{SiO2} = 3.9 respectively [30]. In the nonretarded regime where β » k_{ 0 }, the Eq. (3) can be simplified to [31].
where β is the propagation constant SPPs on graphene layer, and the effective refractive index n_{eff} of the SPP mode can be derived from n_{eff} = β/k_{ 0 }. σ_{g} is the surface conductivity of graphene composed of the contributions of intraband and interband, i.e., σ_{g} = σ_{intra} + σ_{inter} [29, 30]. The intraband conductivity σ_{intra} corresponding to the intraband electronphoton scattering process is given by
where μ_{c} is the chemical potential relating to the electron density, e is the electron charge, ω is the angular frequency of the plasmon, ℏ and k_{ B } are the reduced Planck’s constant and the Boltzmann’s constant respectively, T is the temperature, and τ represents the electron momentum relaxation time due to charge carrier scattering. For ℏω » k_{ B }T and μ_{c} » k_{ B }T, the interband conductivity σ_{inter} corresponding to interband electron transitions can be approximately expressed as
Results and Discussion
The energy band structures of the proposed plasmonic crystals are obtained by employing the finite element method (FEM) based commercially available software COMSOL Multiphysics. In Fig. 1a, we notice that both the rhombic unit cell of two graphene nanodisks (green dashed rhombus defined by vectors a_{ s1 } and a_{ s2 }) and the hexagonal unit cell of six graphene nanodisks (with lattice vectors a_{ 1 } and a_{ 2 }) can form the honeycomblattice plasmonic crystals. Figure 1b presents the BZs for the rhombic and hexagonal unit cells, with the irreducible zones of M_{II}Γ_{II} K_{II} M_{II} and M_{I}Γ_{I} K_{I} M_{I} respectively. Note that the hexagonal unit cell is three times larger than the rhombic primitive one. Therefore, the first BZ of the rhombic primitive unit cell is three times larger than that of the hexagonal one (blue region in Fig. 1b). When taking a rhombic primitive unit cell, this plasmonic crystal exhibits Dirac cone dispersion at K_{II} and K_{II}` points in the BZ corners as shown in Fig. 1c. The insets in Fig. 1c show the eigen electric field distributions of the two degenerated states at Dirac point. Similar to the pseudospins in classical photonic and acoustic systems [17, 19, 20], in order to mimic the analog of the pseudospins in plasmonic system, the degree of freedom should be increased to twofold states. Thus, fourfold degenerated double Dirac cones in the plasmonic band structure are required. By employing zone folding mechanism [18], the Dirac cones at K_{II} and K_{II}` points are folded to a double Dirac cone at Γ point in the BZ center when taking the larger hexagonal unit cell (as displayed in Fig. 1d). The insets in Fig. 1d show the fourfold degenerated eigenstates with dipole and quadrupole modes. The relative parameters we use are μ_{c1} = 0.3 eV, μ_{c2} = 0.6 eV, and τ = 1 ps, which are moderately chosen from the previous researches for practical graphene [32, 33].
The fourfold degenerated double Dirac cones composed of two dipolar and two quadrupolar modes are associated with two 2D irreducible representations of a C_{6v} point group, namely, E_{1} modes of odd spatial parity and E_{2} modes of even spatial parity. Following the conventional notation widely adopted in quantum mechanics [34], we can classify these modes to the p_{ x }/p_{ y } and d_{ x2y2 }/d_{ xy } modes according to their eigen E_{ z } field distributions shown in Fig. 2. Next, in order to open a nontrivial topological band gap at the Γ point, we take further modifications (i.e., deforming the honeycomb lattice of a/R = 3) on the hexagonal unit cell to break the symmetry. When shrinking the graphene nanodisks to a/R = 3.2, the fourfold degenerated double Dirac cone splits into two twofold degenerate states and a bulk band gap opened from 62.1 to 63.5 THz as shown in Fig. 2a. The E_{ z } fields of the lower bands have a pair of dipole modes exhibiting p_{ ± } characters, while the upper bands have a pair of quadrupole modes exhibiting d_{ ± } characters around the Γ point, which is consistent with the classic photonic theory that the dipole modes must exhibit lower frequency than the higher order quadrupole modes. However, a band inversion takes place when expanding the graphene nanodisks to a/R = 2.9, i.e., the dipole modes rise above the quadrupole modes, which brings about the topological nontrivial band gap from 62.4 to 63.3 THz as shown in Fig. 2c. Figure 2d, e illustrates the process of topological transition between p_{ ± } and d_{ ± } states, and the inplane magnetic fields associated with p_{ ± } and d_{ ± } are marked with white arrows. The angular momenta of the wave function of E_{ z }fields p_{ ± } = (p_{ x } ± ip_{ y })/\( \sqrt{2} \) and d_{ ± } = (d_{ x2y2 } ± id_{ xy })/\( \sqrt{2} \) further constitute the pseudospin in the present plasmonic crystals [17, 18].
To further explore the topological property of the band gaps shown in Fig. 2a, c, it is generally related to an effective Hamiltonian description and topological numbers. By applying the \( \overset{\rightharpoonup }{k}\cdot \overset{\rightharpoonup }{p} \) perturbation theory, the effective Hamiltonian H_{eff}(k) around the Γ point on the basis [p_{ + }, d_{ + }, p_{ − }, d_{ − }] can be expressed as [17, 35].
where k_{ ± } = k_{ x } ± ik_{ y }, and A comes from offdiagonal elements of the firstorder perturbation term \( {M}_{\alpha \beta}=\left\langle {\Gamma}_{\alpha}\left\overset{\rightharpoonup }{k}\cdot \overset{\rightharpoonup }{p}\right{\Gamma}_{\beta}\right\rangle \) with α = 1, 2 and β = 3, 4. The effective Hamiltonian H_{eff}(k) takes a similar form as the BernevigHughesZhang (BHZ) model for the CdTe/HgTe/CdTe quantum well system [36], implying a topological band gap when the band inversion takes place. Based on the Hamiltonian expressed in Eq. (5), we can evaluate the spin Chern numbers of the topological plasmonic crystals as [36].
Here, M = (E_{ p } – E_{ d })/2 is the frequency difference between E_{ 2 } and E_{ 1 } representations at the Γ point. B is determined by the diagonal elements of the secondorder perturbation term and is typically negative [19]. Thus, C_{ ± } = 0 is obtained when having a normal band order as displayed in Fig. 2a. And we conclude that the band gap opened is trivial. However, M becomes positive when band inversion occurs. Therefore, C_{ ± } = ±1 is simply obtained, and the gap in Fig. 2c is nontrivial.
By overlapping the band gaps with different topologies (i.e., topological trivial and topological nontrivial), one can create edge states that are spatially confined around the interface between two plasmonic crystals. Here, we consider a ribbon of topologically nontrivial plasmonic crystal (with band structure shown in Fig. 2c) with its two edges cladded by two topologically trivial plasmonic crystals (with band structure shown in Fig. 2a) at the same frequency window. The two trivial regions prevent possible edge states from leaking into free space. In Fig. 3a, we present the calculated projected band structures along the ΓK direction for such a ribbon, where a bulk band gap is spanned by additional topological edge states as indicated by the double degenerated red curves. Fig. 3b plots the electric field distributions confined around the interface constructed by two distinctive crystals, corresponding to points A (with k_{ x } = − 0.05π/a) and B (with kx = 0.05π/a) marked in Fig. 3a. The pseudo spinup and spindown characteristics are evidenced by phase vortexes of counterclockwise and clockwise as illustrated on the right panel of Fig. 3b.
The pseudospindependent unidirectional transmission of edge states are also demonstrated in a finite 20a × 18a lattice constructed by the trivial and nontrivial crystals. As shown in Fig. 4a, b, oneway propagation of the SPP wave towards left (right) direction when excited by a pseudo spinup (spindown) source S_{ + } (S_{ − }) of anticlockwise (clockwise) circular polarization of inplane magnetic field. One of the most distinguishing features of topological edge states is that they are robust against perturbations/imperfections. To verify this robustness, we construct sharp bends as displayed in Fig. 4c, where the unidirectional transmission of SPP wave is excited by a pseudo spindown source S_{ − }. The SPP wave vanished eventually after a long traveling distance along the sharp bends due to the intrinsic loss of graphene material. To further confirm this topological transmission, we also exhibit the electric field intensity distribution by ignoring the intrinsic loss of graphene for comparison. As can be seen from Fig. 4d, the SPP wave follows the designed route and maintains the oneway propagation with little backscattering.
Conclusions
In summary, we have systematically investigated the band topologies of the GPCs constructed by periodically patterned graphene nanodisks. By employing zone folding mechanism, the Dirac cones at the BZ corner are folded to a double Dirac cone at the BZ center. Further, topological band gaps are realized by deforming the honeycomb lattice GPCs. Based on the effective Hamiltonian derived by the \( \overset{\rightharpoonup }{k}\cdot \overset{\rightharpoonup }{p} \) perturbation theory, the spin Chern numbers are evaluated. The pseudospin characteristics, evidenced by phase vortexes of counterclockwise and clockwise, are successfully used to realize the unidirectional transmission of edge states along an interface constructed by two topological trivial and nontrivial plasmonic crystals. The designed GPC provides a new path to research topological phenomena and may find potential applications in the fields of topological plasmonics. It might also trigger the exploration of the pseudospin plasmonics and the technique of the pseudospin multiplexing in highdensity nanophotonic integrated circuits.
Abbreviations
 BHZ:

BernevigHughesZhang
 BZ:

Brillouin zone
 FEM:

Finite element method
 GPC:

Graphene plasmonic crystal
 QHE:

Quantum Hall effect
 QSHE:

Quantum spin Hall effect
 SPPs:

Surface plasmon polaritons
References
 1.
He C, Sun XC, Liu XP, Lu MH, Chen Y, Feng L, Chen YF (2016) Photonic topological insulator with broken timereversal symmetry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4924
 2.
Khanikaev AB, Mousavi SH, Tse WK, Kargarian M, Macdonald AH, Shvets G (2013) Photonic topological insulators, Nat. Mater 12:233
 3.
Jörg C, Letscher F, Fleischhauer M, Freymann GV (2017) Dynamic defects in photonic Floquet topological insulators. New J Phys 19:083003
 4.
Cheng X, Jouvaud C, Ni X, Mousavi SH, Genack AZ, Khanikaev AB (2016) Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator. Nat Mater 15:542
 5.
Hafezi M (2014) Measuring topological invariants in photonic systems. Phys Rev Lett 112:210405
 6.
Hatsugai Y (1993) Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 71:3697
 7.
Chen ZG, Mei J, Sun XC, Zhang X, Zhao J, Wu Y (2017) Multiple topological phase transitions in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal. Phys Rev A 95:043827
 8.
Fang K, Yu Z, Fan S (2012) Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat Photonics 6:782–787
 9.
Yang B, Wu T, Zhang X (2017) Engineering topological edge states in two dimensional magnetic photonic crystal. Appl Phys Lett 110:021109
 10.
Ma T, Khanikaev AB, Mousavi SH, Shvets G (2015) Guiding electromagnetic waves around sharp corners: topologically protected photonic transport in metawaveguides. Phys Rev Lett 114:127401
 11.
Dong JW, Chen XD, Zhu H, Wang Y, Zhang X (2017) Valley photonic crystals for control of spin and topology. Nat Mater 16:298–302
 12.
Hafezi M, Mittal S, Fan J, Migdall A, Taylor JM (2013) Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nat Photonics 7:1–2
 13.
Hafezi M, Demler EA, Lukin MD, Taylor JM (2012) Robust optical delay lines with topological protection. Nat Phys 7:907–912
 14.
Maczewsky LJ, Zeuner JM, Nolte S, Szameit A (2017) Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulators. Nat Commun 8:13756
 15.
Rechtsman MC, Zeuner JM, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Podolsky D, Dreisow F, Nolte S, Segev M, Szameit A (2013) Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature 496:196
 16.
Barik S, Miyake H, Degottardi W, Waks E, Hafezi M (2016) Twodimensionally confined topological edge states in photonic crystals. New J Phys 18:113013
 17.
Wu LH, Hu X (2015) Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material. Phys Rev Lett 114:223901
 18.
He C, Ni X, Ge H, Sun XC, Chen YB, Lu MH, Liu XP, Chen YF (2016) Acoustic topological insulator and robust oneway sound transport. Nat Phys 12:1124–1129
 19.
Mei J, Chen Z, Wu Y (2016) Pseudotimereversal symmetry and topological edge states in twodimensional acoustic crystals. Sci Rep 6:32752
 20.
Zhang Z, Wei Q, Cheng Y, Zhang T, Wu D, Liu X (2017) Topological creation of acoustic pseudospin multipoles in a flowfree symmetrybroken metamaterial lattice. Phys Rev Lett 118:084303
 21.
Barnes WL, Dereux A, Ebbesen TW (2003) Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424:824–830
 22.
Iurov A, Huang D, Gumbs G, Pan W, Maradudin A (2017) Effects of optical polarization on hybridization of radiative and evanescent field modes. Phys Rev B 96:081408
 23.
Memmi H, Benson O, Sadofev S, Kalusniak S (2017) Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and molecular vibrations. Phys Rev Lett 118:126802
 24.
Fei Z, Rodin A, Andreev G, Bao W, McLeod A, Wagner M, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Thiemens M, Dominguez G (2012) Gatetuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nanoimaging. Nature 487:82–85
 25.
Chen J, Badioli M, AlonsoGonzález P, Thongrattanasiri S, Huth F, Osmond J, Spasenović M, Centeno A, Pesquera A, Godignon P (2012) Optical nanoimaging of gatetunable graphene plasmons. Nature 487:77–81
 26.
Vakil V, Engheta N (2011) Transformation optics using graphene. Science 332:1291–1294
 27.
Jin D, Christensen T, Soljačić M, Fang NX, Lu L, Zhang X (2017) Infrared topological plasmons in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 118:245301
 28.
Pan D, Yu R, Xu H, FJG d A (2017) Topologically protected Dirac plasmons in a graphene superlattice. Nat Commun 8:1243
 29.
Lu H, Zeng C, Zhang Q, Liu XM, Hossain M, Reineck P, Gu M (2015) Graphenebased active slow surface plasmon polaritons. Sci Rep 5:8443
 30.
Low T, Avouris P (2014) Graphene plasmonics for terahertz to midinfrared applications. ACS Nano 8:1086–1101
 31.
Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljačić M (2009) Plasmonics in graphene at infrared frequencies. Phys Rev B 80:245435
 32.
Bolotin KI, Sikes K, Jiang Z, Klima M, Fudenberg G, Hone J, Kim P, Stormer H (2008) Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Commun 146:351–355
 33.
Efetov DK, Kim P (2010) Controlling electronphonon interactions in graphene at ultrahigh carrier densities. Phys Rev Lett 105:256805
 34.
Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Jorio A, Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer Science & Business Media) 2007
 35.
Klipstein PC (2010) Operator ordering and interfaceband mixing in the Kanelike Hamiltonian of latticematched semiconductor superlattices with abrupt interfaces. Phys Rev B 81:235314
 36.
Bernevig BA, Hughes TL, Zhang SC (2006) Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 314:1757–1761
Funding
The authors are grateful to the support by the Natural Science Fund of China under grant nos. 61378058, 61575070, and 11774103; Fujian Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2015J06015); and the Promotion Program for Young and MiddleAged Teachers in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (No. ZQNYX203).
Availability of Data and Materials
The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within this article.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
WQ provided the original idea; PQ and ZW designed the models; PQ and JR performed the simulations; PQ, ZL, JXW, QK, and JQP analyzed the data; PQ and WQ wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, P., Qiu, W., Ren, J. et al. Pseudospin Dependent OneWay Transmission in GrapheneBased Topological Plasmonic Crystals. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s116710182538x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Graphene
 Plasmonic crystal
 Surface plasmon polaritons
 Topological states