Skip to main content

Advertisement

Influence of pH Adjustment Parameter for Sol–Gel Modification on Structural, Microstructure, and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Strontium Ferrite

Article metrics

  • 938 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Synthesis of nanocrystalline strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) via sol–gel is sensitive to its modification parameters. Therefore, in this study, an attempt of regulating the pH as a sol–gel modification parameter during preparation of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles sintered at a low sintering temperature of 900 °C has been presented. The relationship of varying pH (pH 0 to 8) on structural, microstructures, and magnetic behaviors of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning microscope (FESEM), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Varying the pH of precursor exhibited a strong effect on the sintered density, crystal structure and magnetic properties of the SrFe12O19 nanoparticles. As the pH is 0, the SrFe12O19 produced relatively largest density, saturation magnetization, Ms, and coercivity, Hc, at a low sintering temperature of 900 °C. The grain size of SrFe12O19 is obtained in the range of 73.6 to 133.3 nm. The porosity of the sample affected the density and the magnetic properties of the SrFe12O19 ferrite. It is suggested that the low-temperature sintered SrFe12O19 at pH 0 displayed Ms of 44.19 emu/g and Hc of 6403.6 Oe, possessing a significant potential for applying in low-temperature co-fired ceramic permanent magnet.

Highlight

  • Synthesis of strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) nanoparticles using sol–gel auto combustion technique.

  • The SrFe12O19 nanoferrite phase was obtained at a low sintering temperature, 900 °C.

  • Magnetic parameter of saturation magnetization Ms, remnant Mr, and coercivity Hc decrease as pH increases.

Background

Strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) has been extensively studied for their potential applications in microwave devices, high-density magnetic recording, electronic devices, and permanent magnet. Permanent magnet ferrites are widely used in the electrical manufacturing industry due to its several advantages [1] and impressive properties such as high electrical resistivity [2], large hysteresis loss, and high intrinsic coercivity [3]. It is best known as a good heat resistance and corrosion resistance and useful for many applications. Strontium ferrite has attracted more scientific studies in recent years due to its high magnetic anisotropy, which is responsible for the high coercivity of crystalline structure [4, 5] and thus can ensure a high coercivity even when the size of the particles is reduced into nanoscale with single-domain structure. The ferromagnetism exhibited by SrFe12O19 is attributed to the Fe3+ ion sublattices present in the structure. They are distributed in three octahedral (12 k, 2a, 4f2), one tetrahedral (4f1), and one bipyramidal sites (2b). From these sites, 12 k, 2a, and 2b are represented as the high spin states and 4f1 and 4f2 are considered as the low spin states [6, 7]. The magnetic moments of the Fe3+ ions are coupled to each other by super-exchange interactions mediated by O2− ions. The Sr2+ ion is responsible for the large magnetic uniaxial anisotropy as it causes a perturbation of the crystal lattice [8]. Strontium hexaferrite (SrFe12O19) nanoparticles have a mean particle size of less than 0.1 μm and are made of homogeneous particle size distribution [9]. The smaller particle size produces a large surface area, significantly enhancing the SrFe12O19 nanoparticles properties, such as its chemical, physical, mechanical, and magnetic properties, resulting in interesting properties for nanoferrite applications.

The conventional ceramic solid-state method is difficult in obtaining nanoparticles and mono-sized particles [4, 5]. It has limitations such as long heating schedule at high sintering temperature of about 1300 °C, higher obtained grain/particle size, and higher time consumption. The experimental conditions involved in the making of the ferrite nanoparticles play a key role in the resulting properties as well as the particle size of the ferrite nanoparticles. In order to achieve highly homogeneous SrFe12O19 nanoparticles consisting of a single-domain structure at low sintering or calcination temperature, various methods have been introduced so that a wide grain size distribution with anomolous grain growth promoted during sintering could be avoided. The methods include co-precipitation [9, 10], salt-melt method [11], hydrothermal [12, 13], microemulsion [14], and sol–gel process [1, 4, 15]. Among these methods, sol–gel route is a low-cost, simple, and reliable method to control the stoichiometry and to produce nanocrystalline ferrite. The sol–gel process produces a homogeneous mixed oxide that can lower the calcination temperature and produce a smaller crystallite size [3]. Optimizing the molar ratio of Fe to Sr (Fe/Sr) is very important to produce a single-phase sample, ultrafine particle, and lower calcination temperatures [1]. This ratio varies with change in starting materials and with change in method of production [1]. At high calcination temperature, both grain size and exchange coupling increase. These will be unfavorable for getting a good quality of permanent magnet [16]. In general, metal alkoxides are often used as raw materials in sol–gel process, but many of the alkoxides are very difficult to be obtained and dealt with because of the high sensitivity to the atmospheric moisture. Moreover, it is not easy to control the rate of alkoxide hydrolysis when multi-component ceramics are to be prepared. Metal salts are employed in this study since they are very useful, cheaper, and easier to handle. Besides, metal salts can be dissolved in many kinds of organic solvents, thus forming metal complexes by chelating the metal ions with organic ligands [17]. There are several sol–gel modification processes have been reported, such as pH adjustment [1, 18], basic agent [3], surfactant [1], carboxylic acid [2], and starting metal salts [3], to reduce the final calcination temperature, crystallite size [2], and high anisotropy of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles [12]. In sol–gel methods, the ability to form hydroxides and/or oxides strongly depends on the pH of the solution and the charge/radius ratio of the metal cation [17]. Furthermore, the pH of sol controls the amount of H+ or OH ions in the sol that effectively determines the polymerization of the metal–oxygen bonds. Also, it is known that during the sol–gel process, complexing process with citric acid is sensitive to pH values [19, 20]. Therefore, homogeneity of the sol which is essential for phase formation would be determined by the pH of the solution. It is well known that the magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 are strongly dependent on its morphology, particle/grain size, shape, orientation, and domain configurations by modifying the synthesis parameters. Therefore, in this work, we intend to regulate the pH of the solution as a sol–gel modification parameter to produce nanocrystalline ferrite with considerable values of magnetic properties at a lower calcination temperature.

Methods

The experimental sequences of this study consisted of two major stages which were the synthesis of strontium ferrite nanoparticles via the sol–gel method (the “Synthesis of Strontium Ferrite Nanoparticles” section) and were followed by the characterizations of structural, microstructure, and magnetic properties of prepared strontium ferrite (the “Characterizations of Strontium Ferrite” section).

Synthesis of Strontium Ferrite Nanoparticles

Strontium ferrite nanoparticles have been synthesized via the sol–gel method. In this method, strontium nitrate anhydrous granular Sr(NO3)2 (98%, Alfa Aeser), iron(III) nitrate Fe(NO3)3 (99%, HmbG), citric acid C3H4(OH)(COOH)3 (99%, Alfa Aeser), ammonia NH4OH (25%, SYSTERM), and deionized water were used as starting materials for the preparation of the sample. Appropriate amounts of Sr(NO3)2 and Fe(NO3)3 are dissolved in 100 ml of deionized water for a few minutes at 60 °C with a constant stirrer rotation of 250 rpm to make an aqueous solution. Citric acid was added as a chelating agent with molar ratio of citrate to nitrate (C/N = 0.75), and the temperature was raised to 80 °C. The mixtures were continuously stirred, and NH4OH was added in order to vary the pH from pH 0 to pH 8. The pH was measured by HI2211 pH/ORP meter (HANNA instruments). The solutions were continuously stirred and heated for several hours at 90 °C, and the solution slowly turned into green sticky gel. Upon the formation of a dense sticky gel, the temperature of the hot plate is then increased up to 200 °C and combusted the gels for an hour for the dehydration process. The obtained powders were calcined at 900 °C for 6 h with the heating rate of 5 °C/min. A step-wise description of the synthesis procedure of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart for preparing SrFe12O19 nanoparticles powders by sol–gel method

Characterizations of Strontium Ferrite

Characterization measurement of strontium ferrite has been carried out in terms of its structural, microstructure, and magnetic properties. The detailed explanation is shown in the following subsections.

Structural Properties

The structural characterization of the samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique using a Philips X’pert X-Ray Diffractometer Model 7602 EA Almelo with Cu Kα radiation at 1.5418 Å. The range of diffraction angle used is from 20° to 80° at room temperature. The accelerating current and working voltage were 35 mA and 4.0 kV respectively. The data were analyzed by using an X’Pert High Score Plus software.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) characterization was carried out by a Perkin Elmer Fourier transform infrared spectrometer model 1650 to determine the infrared spectrum of absorption and emission bands of the sample. It was performed between infrared spectra of 280–4000 cm−1.

Microstructure Properties

The microstructural observation was performed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) using a FEI Nova NanoSEM 230 machine. The distribution of grain size image was fixed at a magnification of 100kx with 5.0 kV accelerating voltage. The distributions of grain sizes were obtained by taking 200 different grain images for the sample and estimating the mean diameters of individual grains by using the imageJ software. The grain size distribution was measured by a mean linear intercept method.

Density

The density was measured using a Hildebrand Densitometer Model H-300 S. The density of the sintered pellet was obtained using the Archimedes principle with water as the fluid medium by Eq. 1,

$$ {\rho}_{\mathrm{exp}}=\left(\frac{W_{\mathrm{air}}-{W}_{\mathrm{water}}}{W_{\mathrm{water}}}\right)\times {\rho}_w $$
(1)

ρexp is the measured sample’s density, ρ w is the density of water, Wair is the sample’s weight in air, and Wwater is the sample’s weight in water.

Magnetic Properties

The magnetic properties of samples were measured by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) Model 7404 LakeShore. The measurement was carried out at room temperature. The 12 kOe external field was applied parallel to the sample.

Results and Discussion

Structural Analysis

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of SrFe12O19 nanocrystalline by varying the pH. The structure of XRD peaks was referred to standard SrFe12O19 with JCPDS reference code of 98-004-3603. The characteristic peaks and miller indices of SrFe12O19 are also shown in the figure. The highest intensity can be observed at 2θ (34.218°) with miller indices of [1 1 4]. The formation of single-phase SrFe12O19 was obtained at relatively low calcination temperature of 900 °C. There were no observed peaks corresponding to some of the reagent precursors or other secondary phases and intermediate products, except for the sample prepared at pH 8 where a minute amount of hematite Fe2O3 phase was detected and all of the samples have a good crystallinity as shown in the figure. The formation of secondary Fe2O3 phase observed for sample prepared at pH 8 had reduced the purity of SrFe12O19 to 87.8%. The Fe2O3 patterns were indexed to ICSD reference code of 98-004-1067. The presence of Fe2O3 phase is due to insufficient calcination temperature for the sample prepared at pH 8 [21]. It was found that high acidity in medium solution from pH 0 to 3 favored the formation of high crystallinity SrFe12O19 phase. The increasing pH of the sol assisted the formation of negatively charged iron gels and the adsorption of positively charged Sr ions on iron gels. Consequently, more homogeneous solution was obtained, and it results in the easy formation of SrFe12O19 phase [3]. Even though the formation of SrFe12O19 is easier with increased pH, heterogeneous ceramic aggregates could be formed due to localized shifts in the immediate vicinity of the complex undergoing polymerization [22]. Therefore, crystalline growth might be inhibited, therefore reducing the crystallinity from pH 4 onwards. This was shown by the increase of XRD peak intensity by the improvement of the crystallinity of SrFe12O19 prepared using pH 1 to pH 3, however slowly decreased with increased pH values from 4 to 8. The formation of crystalline SrFe12O19 after being calcined at 900 °C is attributed to the higher degree of compositional homogeneity as well as the greater heat generated from the exothermic reaction of nitrates and citric acid [21].

Fig. 2
figure2

The X-ray diffraction spectra of SrFe12O19 for pH 0 to pH 8, sintered at 900 °C

The lattice parameter a and c value observed were not far different compared to the theoretical SrFe12O19 lattice constant where a = 5.8820 Å and c = 23.0230 Å [23] (Fig. 3). The a and c parameters observed are similar to those in Masoudpanah et al. [3] and Dang et al. [12]. The volume cell Vcell and density of XRD ρxrd used in this study depend on the crystallographic parameter which have a hexagonal crystal system with space group of P63/mmc. The Vcell were calculated using Eq. (2);

$$ {V}_{\mathrm{cell}}=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}{a}^2c $$
(2)

where a and c are the lattice constant. The theoretical density ρtheory of sample was calculated using Eq. (3),

$$ {\rho}_{\mathrm{theory}}=\frac{2M}{N_AV} $$
(3)

where M is the molecular weight of SrFe12O19 which equals to 1061.765 g. The weight of two molecules in one unit cell is 2 × 1061.765 = 2123.53 g; NA is the Avogadro’s number (6.022 × 1023 mol−1).

Fig. 3
figure3

The lattice parameters a and c of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles for pH 0 to pH 8, sintered at 900 °C. The dash lines are the reference values of the lattice parameters a and c

The porosity P of the samples can be calculated using Eq. (4);

$$ P=\left(\frac{1-{\rho}_{\mathrm{exp}}}{\rho_{\mathrm{theory}}}\right)\times 100\% $$
(4)

As the pH value increased, the experimental density of the samples ρexp was decreased except for some fluctuations observed for samples prepared at pH 4, 6, and 7 with optimum value of experimental density and less porosity obtained for sample prepared at pH 4. The optimum density and porosity were recorded as 4.693 g/cm3 and 8.15% respectively (Fig. 4, Table 1). The X-ray density shown in Table 1 is greater than the experimental density which may be due to the presence of pores created during the sintering process. The porous feature of agglomerates is also attributed to the liberation of a large amount of gas such as NH3 during the combustion process [24].

Fig. 4
figure4

Experimental density of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles for pH 0 to pH 8, sintered at 900 °C

Table 1 The structural, microstructural, and magnetic parameters of the SrFe12O19 sintered at 900 °C

The FTIR spectra of sintered SrFe12O19 at varying pH from pH 0 to pH 8 are shown in Fig. 5. The FTIR spectra of a precursor noticeably appeared in the range of 430, 583, 904, and 1446 cm−1 of IR characteristic bands. The absorption band at 436 cm−1 was indicated as a stretching band of CH2, proving the presence of CH saturated compound [25]. Bands at 583 cm‑1 show the characteristic metal oxygen vibration Sr–O Fe–O [20]. The absorption bands of range 443–600 cm−1 were ascribed to the formation of strontium ferrite as stretching vibration of metal–oxygen bond [26,27,28,29]. This confirms that, the SrFe12O19 was formed at a sintering temperature of 900 °C. The relatively strong and broad bands at peaks 904 cm−1 revealed that there was an amine functional group for N–H vibration due to the decomposition of NH3. Meanwhile, Pereira et al. [29] also stated that a broad vibration of Sr–O stretching indicate the formation of strontium nanoferrite. The absorption band at 1446 cm−1 indicates the vibrating bands of Fe–O–Fe bands due to the decomposition of metal with oxides band [25].

Fig. 5
figure5

The FTIR spectra of SrFe12O19 for pH 0 to pH 8, sintered at 900 °C

Microstructural Analysis

The microstructure images of bulk SrFe12O19 and the EDX spectra are shown in Fig. 6, while the grain size distributions of samples are shown in Fig. 7. The average grain sizes were found in the range of 73.6 to 133.3 nm. The average grain size of the samples does not show large variation except for samples with pH 4 and pH 8. The grain sizes were agglomerated as increasing the pH value. A relatively small and packed grain size with an average of 73.6 nm and narrowest grain size distribution among all was observed for pH 0. The grain size increased with increased pH values from pH 0 to pH 3, decreased at pH 4, and further increased until pH 8. The results are in agreement with the XRD spectra as shown in Fig. 2 that the degree of crystallinity reduced for sample at pH 4. From Fig. 6e, for sample prepared at pH 4, it shows that the grains are not homogeneously distributed and not uniformly formed.

Fig. 6
figure6

The FESEM micrographs of samples sintered at 900 °C by varying pH: a pH 0, b pH 1, c pH 2, d pH 3, e pH 4, f pH 5, g pH 6, h pH 7, and i pH 8

Fig. 7
figure7

Grain size distribution for SrFe12O19 calcined at 900 °C by varying pH: a pH 0, b pH 1, c pH 2, d pH 3, e pH 4, f pH 5, g pH 6, h pH 7, and i pH 8

The finest grain size exhibited highest Ms, Mr, and Hc. The grains for samples having pH 0 were spherical in shape and in contact with another grain to form a necking structure. The contact was obvious with increase in pH values, thus showing a more elongated grain structure. The grain size/shape distributions became larger and non-uniform as the pH values increased. The histogram of the grain size distribution shifted from small grain sizes to exhibiting larger grain sizes. The increased combustion rate and heat released from reaction may also increase the crystallite size [30]. The red dotted lines in the histogram (Fig. 7) marked the average grain size of the sample. The microstructure showed some of the samples exhibited large porosity due to the presence of polyvinyl alcohol during preparation of bulk SrFe12O19 nanoferrite in pellet form as well as the liberation of gas during sample preparation.

Magnetic Behaviors

The development of MH hysteresis loop at various pH is illustrated in Fig. 8. A further confirmation of this evolution can be seen from the variation of saturation magnetization, Ms, remanence, Mr, squareness ratio, Mr/Ms, and coercivity, Hc, as a function of pH tabulated in Table 1. Magnetization per unit mass is not directly related to the microstructure of the sample; therefore, magnetization per unit volume has been calculated by multiplying the magnetization per unit mass with the experimental density, ρexp. The Ms, Mr, and Hc are found to be generally decreased with increasing pH by addition of ammonia in a sol–gel precursor. The decrement of magnetic parameters as pH increases could be due to the existence of large amount of diamagnetic phases of ammonia NH3. It seems that the main effect of the diamagnetic NH3 are to isolate Sr-ferrite nanoparticles from each other, thus reducing exchange interaction between them and are known to have a detrimental effect on Ms and Mr. As seen previously in the “Microstructural analysis” section, the microstructure of SrFe12O19 was affected by increasing the pH value. This is in agreement with the findings reported by Yang et al. [31], where the particles became larger [32] with the increase of pH from 5 to 11. The larger particles were highly affected by strong magnetic interaction between magnetic atoms of Fe in the grains [33].

Fig. 8
figure8

The MH hysteresis loops of SrFe12O19 for a pH 0 to pH 8 and b close-up graph, varying pH sintered at 900 °C

The MH hysteresis loops in Fig. 8 have been scrutinized, and three significant groups of hysteresis loops characterized by the shapes and values of differentiated group could be observed. The first group consisted majority of the prepared samples which are samples prepared using pH 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8. This group corresponded to the weak ferromagnetic properties with low values of Ms and Mr. It is known that Ms is particularly depending on the crystallinity of the sample. This could be seen in the samples prepared using pH 4, 5, 7, and 8, where the crystallinity was reduced for the samples, thus displaying lower values of Ms. Furthermore, the presence of 28.2% α-Fe2O3 impurity as a secondary phase was detected in sample prepared using pH 8, reducing the crystallinity of the sample and consequently reducing the M s value. Even though the observed XRD spectra in Fig. 2 displayed high degree of crystallinity for samples prepared using pH 3, the resulting low magnetic property values might be subjected to decrease in density (see Table 1) due to the presence of pores, thus affecting the coercivity in the sample. Since Ms is related to Hc as shown in Eq. (5) [34], the M s decreased when the H c increased.

$$ {H}_c=\frac{2{K}_1}{M_s} $$
(5)

It is also known that porosity affects the magnetization process because pores work as a generator of demagnetizing field [35].

It is noticeable that pH 2 and pH 6 fell in the second group in which the samples have moderate hysteresis parameters (Fig. 8). The samples in this group exhibited similar shape of hysteresis loop with the first group but with slightly higher values of Ms and Mr. The H c values recorded for the samples prepared using pH 2 and pH 6 were 6005.8 and 5377.0 Oe respectively. The Ms values for pH 2 and pH 6 were observed as 7.8 emu/g (226.2 emu/cm3) and 7.0 emu/g (35.8 emu/cm3), respectively, whereas the Mr values for pH 2 and pH 6 were given as 4.9 emu/g and 4.4 emu/g respectively. Even though larger grain size was present in the samples, the recorded values were still low since the presence of elongated grains was detected (see the red dotted circles in Fig. 6c, g) in the samples prepared using pH 2 and 6. Since it is known that total anisotropy energy barrier depends on volume and surface anisotropy energy densities, so for a given volume of a particle, the surface area is more for elongated shape particles. Hence, the major contribution from surface to the effective anisotropy and an increase in Hc is also expected in elongated particles [36], thus reducing the Ms.

The third group was detected in an only sample prepared using pH 0. Significant gap was observed between the second and the third groups, indicating the changing properties in samples within this group particularly in the Ms values. Hysteresis loop for pH 0 has the largest Ms, Mr, and Hc with the significant values of 44.19 emu/g (226.2 emu/cm3), 27.59 emu/g, and 6403.6 Oe respectively. Generally, the M s values for SrFe12O19 could be ranged from 74 to 92 emu/g which are often measured in a single crystal form [8]. The value of M s for sample prepared using pH 0 was relatively lower than the given values and also with previously reported studies which were 56 emu/g [37] and 53 emu/g [38], both synthesis via the sol–gel method. It is expected that the value of M s in this study would be increased with further increment of sintering temperatures. However, the H c value showed a relatively higher value than previous studies which were 5000 Oe [37] and 5200 Oe [38], and according to Pullar [8], no precise value is given for H c as it varies too much with processing methods and grain size. Meanwhile, no significant difference of M r was seen as has been previously reported which was 30 emu/g [38]. An obvious erect, larger, and well-defined hysteresis loops could be observed. It is due to the strong ferromagnetic behavior, resulting from the formation of high volume fraction of the complete crystalline SrFe12O19 phase as seen in Fig. 2. Thus, a strong interaction of magnetic moments within domains occurred due to exchange forces. This observed phenomenon can be considered as an ordered magnetism in the sample. In fact, in order to obtain an ordered magnetism and a well-formed MH hysteresis loop, there must exist a significant domain formation, a sufficiently strong anisotropy field, Ha, and optional addition contributions which come from defects such as grain boundaries and pores [39]. It is interesting to note that the broad loops in this group means substantial magnetic storage; thus, the samples possess characteristics which may be useful for practical applications [40].

The Hc variation in Figs. 9a and 10 should deserve some mention: The Hc is observed to generally reduce as pH increased. The decrease in Hc with increasing pH can be attributed to decrement of magnetocrystalline anisotropy with anisotropic Fe2+ ions locating on a 2a site and the enlargement of the grain size and is evident in FESEM micrographs (Fig. 6). Furthermore, at pH 8, the coercivity H c which is 5117.7 Oe was recorded due to the presence of 28.2% α-Fe2O3 impurity (Fig. 2). The decrease in Hc was due to the presence of impurity α-Fe2O3 which affected the crystalline and grain boundary since it has been reported that the Hc could be affected by important parameters such as particle size, ion substitution, morphology, interface structure, crystal defects, magnetocrystalline anisotropy, and strain [41]. The squareness ratio, Mr/Ms, is calculated from the magnetic data and tabulated in Table 1. Generally, a large Mr/Ms value is preferred in many applications such as magnetic recording media of high density and permanent magnet [42]. The calculated Mr/Ms in this study was found to be in the range of 0.63 to 0.65, indicating that all the samples are predominantly in single magnetic domain structure [43]. Mr/Ms equal to or above 0.5 indicates that the particles are in the single magnetic domain and below 0.5 may be attributed to the formation of multidomain structure [43, 44].

Fig. 9
figure9

a Hc and b Ms of SrFe12O19 at varied pH sintered at 900 °C

Fig. 10
figure10

Relation of Hc and grain size of SrFe12O19 at varied pH sintered at 900 °C

Conclusions

Single-phase nanoparticles of SrFe2O19 prepared using different pH were successfully synthesized by sol–gel method. The effects of structural, microstructural, and magnetic behavior of SrFe2O19 were studied by modifying the pH values at the fix sintering temperature of 900 °C. From this study, it can be concluded that pH values play an important role in the formation of single-phase SrFe12O19 which required pH not more than 7 and, by increasing pH from 0 to 3, the formation of SrFe12O19 is favored. SEM micrographs exhibited a circular crystal type of SrFe2O19 with average grain size in the range of 73 to 133 nm. The single-phase SrFe2O19 with optimum magnetic properties are observed in sample prepared at pH 0 which displayed best in-plane saturation magnetization of 44.188 emu/g and remnant magnetization of 27.593 emu/g and with high coercivity of 6403.6 Oe.

Abbreviations

ρ exp :

Measured sample’s density

ρ theory :

Theoretical density

ρ w :

Density of water

ρ xrd :

Density of XRD

a :

Lattice parameter

C:

Carbon

c :

Lattice parameter

C/N:

Citrate to nitrate

C3H4(OH)(COOH)3 :

Citric acid

EDX:

Energy-dispersive X-ray

Fe:

Iron

Fe(NO3)3 :

Iron(III) nitrate

Fe2O3 :

Hematite

FESEM:

Field emission scanning microscope

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

H:

Hydrogen

H a :

Anisotropy field

Hc :

Coercivity

IR:

Infrared

K 1 :

Anisotropy constant

M :

Molecular weight

M r :

Remanence

M r /M s :

Squareness ratio

Ms :

Saturation magnetization

N:

Nitrogen

N A :

Avogadro’s number

NH3 :

Ammonia

NH4OH:

Ammonia

O:

Oxygen

P :

Porosity

Sr:

Strontium

Sr(NO3)2 :

Strontium nitrate anhydrous granular

SrFe12O19 :

Strontium ferrite

V cell :

Volume cell

VSM:

Vibrating sample magnetometer

W air :

Sample’s weight in air

W water :

Sample’s weight in water

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

References

  1. 1.

    Alamolhoda S, Seyyed Ebrahimi SA, Badiei A (2016) A study on the formation of strontium hexaferrite nanopowder by a sol-gel auto-combustion method in the presence of surfactant. J Magn Mag Mater 303(1):69–72 Elsevier.

  2. 2.

    Masoudpanah SM, Ebrahimi SAS, Ong CK (2012) Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials preparation of strontium hexaferrite film by pulsed laser deposition with in situ heating and post annealing. J Magn Magn Mater 324(18):2894–2898.

  3. 3.

    Masoudpanah SM, Ebrahimi SAS (2012) Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured strontium hexaferrite thin films by the sol–gel method. J Magn Magn Mater 324(14):2239–2244.

  4. 4.

    Wong YC, Wang J, Teh GB (2014) Structural and magnetic studies of SrFe12O19 by sol-gel method. Procedia Eng 76:45–52.

  5. 5.

    Mosleh Z, Kameli P, Ranjbar M, Salamati H (2014) Effect of annealing temperature on structural and magnetic properties of BaFe12O19 hexaferrite nanoparticles. Ceram Int 40(5):7279–7284.

  6. 6.

    Ezhil Vizhi R, Harikrishnan V, Saravanan P, Rajan Babu D (2016) Influence of co-substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe12O19. J Cryst Growth 452:117–124.

  7. 7.

    Li Q, Song J, Saura-Múzquiz M, Besenbacher F, Christensen M, Dong M (2016) Magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite nanostructures measured with magnetic force microscopy. Sci Rep 6(April):1–7.

  8. 8.

    Pullar RC (2012) Hexagonal ferrites: a review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics. Prog Mater Sci 57(7):1191–1334.

  9. 9.

    Ganjali M, Ganjali M, Eskandari A, Aminzare M (2013) Effect of heat treatment on structural and magnetic properties of Nanocrystalline SrFe12O19 hexaferrite synthesized by co-precipitation method. J Adv Mater Process 1(4):41–48.

  10. 10.

    Lu HF, Hong RY, Li HZ (2011) Influence of surfactants on co-precipitation synthesis of strontium ferrite. J Alloy Comp 509(41):10127–10131.

  11. 11.

    Guo Z-B, Ding W-P, Zhong W, Zhang J-R, Du Y-W (1997) Preparation and magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 particles prepared by the salt-melt method. J Magn Magn Mater 175(3):333–336.

  12. 12.

    Dang TMH, Trinh VD, Bui DH, Phan MH, Huynh DC (2012) Sol–gel hydrothermal synthesis of strontium hexaferrite nanoparticles and the relation between their crystal structure and high coercivity properties. Adv Nat Sci (Nanosci Nanotech) 3(2):25015.

  13. 13.

    Xia A, Zuo C, Chen L, Jin C, Lv Y (2013) Hexagonal SrFe12O19 ferrites: hydrothermal synthesis and their sintering properties. J Magn Magn Mater 332:186–191.

  14. 14.

    Fang J, Wang J, Gan L-M, Ng S-C, Ding J, Liu X (2000) Fine strontium ferrite powders from an ethanol-based microemulsion. J Am Ceram Soc 83(5):1049–1055.

  15. 15.

    Kanagesan S, Hashim M, Jesurani S, Kalaivani T, Ismail I, Ahmod CS (2013) Effect of microwave sintering on microstructural and magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite using sol-gel technique. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 24(10):3881–3884.

  16. 16.

    Li YL, Feng TF, Chen ZY (2011) Dependence of microstructure and magnetic properties of FePt/B nanocomposite films on boron content. Appl Surf Sci 257(8):3666–3669.

  17. 17.

    Sakka S (2005) Handbook of sol-gel science and technology. 1. Sol-gel processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.

  18. 18.

    Sulaiman S, Azis RS, Hassan J, Zakaria A, Muda NNC, Shahrani NMM et al (2015) Effect of pH variation on magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite. J Solid State Sci Technol Lett 16(1):83–87.

  19. 19.

    Alamolhoda S, Mirkazemi SM, Shahjooyi T, Benvidi N (2016) Effect of pH changes on phase constituents, microstructure and magnetic properties of nano-sized NiFe2O4 powder synthesized by sol-gel auto combustion method. Iran J Mater Sci Eng 13:21–27.

  20. 20.

    Masoudpanah SM, Seyyed Ebrahimi SA (2011) Effect of pH value on the structural and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline strontium hexaferrite thin films. J Magn Magn Mater 323(21):2643–2647 Elsevier.

  21. 21.

    Hosseini Vajargah S, Madaah Hosseini HR, Nemati ZA (2006) Synthesis of nanocrystalline yttrium iron garnets by sol-gel combustion process: the influence of pH of precursor solution. Mater Sci Eng B Solid State Mater Adv Technol 129(1-3):211–215.

  22. 22.

    >Owens GJ, Singh RK, Foroutan F, Alqaysi M, Han CM, Mahapatra C et al (2016) Sol-gel based materials for biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci 77:1–79.

  23. 23.

    Muller J, Collomb A (1992) A new representation of the bipyramidal site in the SrFe12O19 M-type hexagonal ferrite between 4.6 and 295 K. J Magn Magn Mater 103(1):194–203.

  24. 24.

    Madani SS, Mahmoudzadeh G, Abedini Khorrami S (2012) Influence of pH on the characteristics of cobalt ferrite powder prepared by a combination of sol-gel auto-combustion and ultrasonic irradiation techniques. J Ceram Process Res 13(2):123–126.

  25. 25.

    Reza G, Ghasemi A, Saidi A (2014) Enhanced magnetic properties of substituted Sr-hexaferrite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Ceram Int 40(3):4945–4952.

  26. 26.

    Malhotra S, Chitkara M, Sandhu IS (2015) Microwave absorption study of nano synthesized strontium ferrite particles in X band. Int J Signal Process Image Process Pattern Recogn 8(10):115–120.

  27. 27.

    Song F, Shen X, Xiang J, Song H (2010 Mar) Formation and magnetic properties of M-Sr ferrite hollow fibers via organic gel-precursor transformation process. Mater Chem Phys 120(1):213–216.

  28. 28.

    Mali A, Ataie A (2005) Structural characterization of nano-crystalline BaFe12O19 powders synthesized by sol–gel combustion route. Scr Mater 53(9):1065–1070 Elsevier.

  29. 29.

    Pereira FMM, Junior CAR, Santos MRP, Sohn RSTM, Freire FNA, Sasaki JM et al (2008) Structural and dielectric spectroscopy studies of the M-type barium strontium hexaferrite alloys (Ba x Sr1 − xFe12O19). J Mater Sci Mater Electron 19(7):627–638.

  30. 30.

    Yue Z, Guo W, Zhou J, Gui Z, Li L (2004) Synthesis of nanocrystalline ferrites by sol–gel combustion process: the influence of pH value of solution. J Magn Magn Mater 270(1-2):216–223.

  31. 31.

    Yang FJ, Min JJ, Kang ZW, Tu SY, Chen HB, Liu DG et al (2017) The influence of pH value and composition on the microstructure, magnetic properties of Co-Fe-Al Heusler nanoparticles. Chem Phys Lett 670(3):1–4.

  32. 32.

    Tian L, Xu J, Xiao S (2011) The influence of pH and bath composition on the properties of Ni-Co coatings synthesized by electrodeposition. Vacuum 86(1):27–33.

  33. 33.

    Hesani M, Yazdani A, Abedi Ravan B, Ghazanfari M (2010) The effect of particle size on the characteristics of FeCo nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 150(13-14):594–597.

  34. 34.

    Goldman A (2006) Modern Ferrite Technology. Springer Science and Business Media, Inc., Pittsburgh.

  35. 35.

    Anjaneyulu T, Narayana Murthy P, Rafi SM, Bademiya S, Samuel JG (2013) Effect on magnetic properties of zinc doped nano ferrites synthesized by precursor or method. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron 19:37–43.

  36. 36.

    Srikala D, Singh VN, Banerjee A, Mehta BR (2010) Effect of induced shape anisotropy on magnetic properties of ferromagnetic cobalt nanocubes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(12):8088–8094.

  37. 37.

    Otsuki E, Matsuzawa H (1997) Magnetic properties of SrO.nFe2O3 powder synthesized by self-combustion process. J Phys IV Colloq 07(C1):C1–323–C1–324.

  38. 38.

    Dadfar MR, Seyyed Ebrahimi SA, Masoudpanah SM (2014) Sol–gel synthesis and characterization of SrFe12O19/TiO2 nanocomposites. J Supercond Nov Magn 28(1):89–94.

  39. 39.

    Nazlan R, Hashim M, Abdullah NH, Ibrahim IR, Ismail I (2012) Influence of milling time on the crystallization, morphology and magnetic properties of polycrystalline yttrium iron garnet. Adv Mater Res 501:324–328.

  40. 40.

    Shafie MSE, Hashim M, Ismail I, Kanagesan S, Fadzidah MI, Idza IR et al (2014) Magnetic M–H loops family characteristics in the microstructure evolution of BaFe12O19. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 25(9):3787–3794.

  41. 41.

    Zhang C, Liu X, Rehman KMU, Liu C, Li H, Meng X (2017) Influence of Y3+ substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of Sr0.7La0.3Fe11.75−xY x Co0.25O19 hexagonal ferrites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 123(8):526.

  42. 42.

    Zi ZF, Sun YP, Zhu XB, Yang ZR, Dai JM, Song WH (2008) Structural and magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 hexaferrite synthesized by a modified chemical co-precipitation method. J Magn Magn Mater 320(21):2746–2751.

  43. 43.

    Ali I, Islam MU, Awan MS, Ahmad M, Ashiq MN, Naseem S (2013) Effect of Tb3+ substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of M-type hexaferrites synthesized by sol–gel auto-combustion technique. J Alloys Compd 550:564–572.

  44. 44.

    Topal U (2008) Factors influencing the remanent properties of hard magnetic barium ferrites: impurity phases and grain sizes. J Magn Magn Mater 320(3-4):331–335.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Education Malaysia for providing funds; MyBrain15, Research University Grants Vot Nos. 9533300, 9541600, and 5524942; and the Department of Physics and the Materials Synthesis and Characterization Laboratories (MSCL) ITMA, UPM, for the measurement facilities.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Education Malaysia for providing funds and MyBrain15, Research University Grants Vot Nos. 9533300, 9541600, and 5524942.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Author information

All authors have contributed to the final manuscript of the present investigation. RSA and SS have defined the research topic. RSA, SS, and NNCM are involved in the synthesis, characterization, and analysis of the study. RSA, SS, IRI, and RN wrote the manuscript. AZ, JH, NMS, YWF, MSM, and KAM provided suggestions on the draft of the manuscript. All authors examined and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Raba’ah Syahidah Azis.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azis, R.S., Sulaiman, S., Ibrahim, I.R. et al. Influence of pH Adjustment Parameter for Sol–Gel Modification on Structural, Microstructure, and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Strontium Ferrite. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 160 (2018) doi:10.1186/s11671-018-2562-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sol–gel
  • pH
  • Structural
  • Microstructure
  • Magnetic behavior
  • Strontium hexaferrite (SrFe12O19)