 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
Design of QuadBand Terahertz Metamaterial Absorber Using a Perforated Rectangular Resonator for Sensing Applications
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 13, Article number: 137 (2018)
Abstract
Quadband terahertz absorber with singlesized metamaterial design formed by a perforated rectangular resonator on a gold substrate with a dielectric gap in between is investigated. The designed metamaterial structure enables four absorption peaks, of which the first three peaks have large absorption coefficient while the last peak possesses a high Q (quality factor) value of 98.33. The underlying physical mechanisms of these peaks are explored; it is found that their nearfield distributions are different. Moreover, the figure of merit (FOM) of the last absorption peak can reach 101.67, which is much higher than that of the first three absorption modes and even absorption bands of other works operated in the terahertz frequency. The designed device with multipleband absorption and high FOM could provide numerous potential applications in terahertz technologyrelated fields.
Background
Metamaterials with sub or deep subwavelength structure size have received more and more attention because they have been proved to show exotic electromagnetic (EM) properties [1,2,3] that cannot be directly obtained under the natural condition. In addition to these fascinating effects, metamaterials have also a wide variety of applications in functional devices [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Metamaterial absorbers, as the special branch of the metamaterial devices, have evoked great interest of researchers because they can be used to achieve large light absorption [6, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
In the year of 2008, a research group from Boston College first designed the metamaterial absorber at the microwave region by making full use of the dissipation losses of the sandwich structure composed of electric ring resonator, lossy dielectric layer, and the metallic cut wire [6]. Thereafter, various kinds of investigations have been proved based on different shapes or sizes of metallic resonators. For example, Yao et al. presented a miniaturized metamaterial absorber by using a foldedline structure [17]. Crossshaped terahertz absorber was demonstrated in Ref. [18]. Unfortunately, these demonstrated metamaterial absorbers are limited to the singleband absorption, which can greatly restrict their practical applications. To resolve the issue of the singleband absorption, the design and development of the multipleband and even broadband light absorbers are necessary.
Results demonstrate that the blending of multiple resonators to form coplanar or layered structures can have the ability to achieve the perfect absorption in multiple frequency bands (i.e., the multipleband absorption) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. For example, coplanar structures consisted of several different sizes of closedring resonators [22,23,24,25,26,27], square patches [28, 29], and electric ring resonators [30,31,32,33] were presented to realize dualband and tripleband absorption. Layered structure designs were suggested to also obtain the multipleband absorption devices [34,35,36,37,38]. In these suggestions, each metallic resonator has only single absorption mode, and therefore, the design of the multipleband absorption devices requires at least as many resonators as absorption peaks. In Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], we clearly found that the dualband, tripleband, and even quadband metamaterial absorbers indeed need at least two, three, and four metallic resonators in a unit cell, respectively. That is to say, previous studies are mainly focused on how to achieve multipleband absorption by utilizing multiple different sizes of resonators, few of them are investigated whether the singlesized resonator has the ability to exhibit multipleband absorption responses.
In this paper, we demonstrate that singlesized metallic resonator enables quadband absorption, which is different from previous design concepts that several resonators with different sizes are needed. The design of quadband light absorber is composed of a perforated rectangular resonator on a gold mirror with a lossy dielectric layer in between. Numerical results clearly indicate that the designed metamaterial structure possesses four narrowband absorption peaks, of which the first three peaks have strong absorption of 97.80% on average while the fourth peak has Q value of 98.33. With the aid of the nearfield distributions, the underlying physical pictures of the quadband absorption are analyzed. The sensing performance of the suggested light absorption device is also discussed; results prove that the sensing sensitivity (S) of the device, in particular of the S of the fourth absorption peak, can reach 3.05 THz per refraction index; and the figure of merit (FOM; the definition of the FOM is sensing sensitivity S divided by its absorption bandwidth [44, 45]) of this mode can be up to 101.67. The large S and high FOM of the designed light absorption device are promising in sensorrelated fields.
Methods
Figure 1a shows the side view of the designed quadband light absorber, it is composed of a perforated rectangular resonator (see Fig. 1b), and a metallic board and a lossy dielectric layer separated them. The metallic layers of the light absorber are made of 0.4 μm gold, and its conductivity is σ = 4.09 × 10^{7} S/m. The lossy dielectricseparated layer has the thickness of t = 9 μm and the lossy dielectric constant of 3(1 + i0.05), and this kind of lossy dielectric material is widely used in the field of metamaterials [46]. The top view of the perforated rectangular resonator is depicted in Fig. 1b, and its geometrical parameters are as follows: the length and width of the rectangular resonator are l = 80 μm and w = 40 μm, respectively. The length and width of the perforated air hole are l_{1} = 25 μm and l_{2} = 35 μm, respectively. The deviation value of the perforated air hole is δ = 18 μm. The periods in Px and Py are respectively 100 and 60 μm.
Here, we would like to briefly introduce the design rules of the metasurface, i.e., the singlesized perforated rectangular resonator. In general, the traditional singlesized metallic resonator (for example, closedring resonator, square patch, and rectangular resonator) has only one resonance absorption peak, and the design of the multipleband light absorption devices requires at least as many resonators as absorption peaks. As given and reported in Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], the dualband, tripleband, and even quadband light absorption devices indeed need at least two, three, and four metallic resonators in a unit cell, respectively. In other words, previous works are mainly concentrated on how to achieve multipleband light absorption devices using multiple different sizes (or shapes) of the traditional metallic resonators, few of them are investigated whether the singlesized resonator with the slight structure deformation has the ability to achieve multipleband absorption. Here, we try to obtain the multipleband absorption by introducing the breach (i.e., the air hole) on the traditional rectangular metallic resonator. It is foreseeable that the introduction of the air hole on the traditional rectangular resonator can break the symmetry of the original rectangular metallic resonator and can break the original nearfield distributions (or the rearrangement of the nearfield distributions in the perforated rectangular resonator), thus introducing (or generating) some new resonance absorption modes. As mentioned in Fig. 4, the introduction of the breach (or the air hole) on the traditional rectangular resonator can indeed rearrange the nearfield distributions, resulting in some new resonance absorption peaks. Therefore, we believe that the slight structure deformation of the traditional metallic resonator is an effective way to achieve the multipleband absorption; this kind of design method is bound to have obvious advantages compared to the previous design approaches using multiple differentsized resonators [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Additionally, for the metamaterial absorber, its 100% absorption can be mainly derived from two aspects, the ohmic loss in metallic layers and the absorption in the dielectric slab using the lossy dielectric. In the frequency bands of terahertz and microwave [6, 18, 23,24,25, 39, 50], the ohmic loss in metallic layers is usually smaller than the absorption in the dielectric layer. That is to say, it is impossible to merely use the ohmic loss to achieve the 100% absorption. Therefore, it is usually necessary to use the lossy dielectric as the dielectric slab of the metamaterial absorbers [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
The quadband metamaterial absorber is simulated by employing the commercial software, FDTD Solutions, which is based on the finite difference time domain method. In the calculation, a plane electromagnetic wave with the electric field along the direction of xaxis is used as the light source, which is perpendicularly irradiated to the resonance structure (from the perforated resonator to the lossy dielectric layer and the gold mirror) along the direction of the zaxis (see Fig. 1). The light source has the frequency range of (0.2~3.0) THz. To ensure the accuracy of calculation results, the size of the light source should be slightly larger than that of the repeated period of the structure, at the same time enough simulation times and the suitable boundaries (periodic boundaries in directions of x and yaxis and perfectly matched layers in direction of zaxis) should be utilized.
Results and Discussion
Figure 2a gives the absorption performance the presented quadband terahertz metamaterial absorber. As revealed, the suggested simplesized structure can have four peaks, the frequencies of them are respectively 0.84 THz in point A, 1.77 THz in point B, 2.63 THz in point C, and 2.95 THz in point D. The first three frequency points (A, B, and C) have the large average absorption rates of 97.80%, and the absorption of the frequency point D is about 60.86%. The bandwidths (full width at half maximum, abbreviated as FWHM) of the frequency points A, B, C, and D are 0.13, 0.13, 0.10, and 0.03 THz, respectively. In general, the Q (or quality factor, and the definition of the Q is the resonance frequency point divided by its bandwidth) value is a very important indicator in judging the performance of the resonance mode. It can directly reflect whether the resonance mode can be used in sensing applications. The higher the Q value, the better the sensing performance. According to the definition of the Q value, the Q value of the frequency point D can be up to 98.33, which is much larger than that of the frequency points A with Q of 6.46, B with Q of 13.62, and C with Q of 26.32. The large Q value of the frequency point D has potential applications in sensorrelated fields. For the detailed discussion of it, please see below Fig. 5 and its text instructions.
To insight into the physical mechanism of the quadband light absorber, we compare the absorption performance of the perforated rectangular resonator (i.e., the suggested structure in Fig. 1) and the unperforated rectangular resonator (i.e., without the air hole on the rectangular resonator), as shown in Fig. 3a, b. It should be noted that geometric parameters of those two kinds of absorbers are the same, except without the air hole for the unperforated rectangular resonator. For the absorption performance of unperforated rectangular resonator in Fig. 3a, two clear absorption peaks (marked as modes E and F) are achieved, the absorption rates of the two frequency points are 93.95 and 82.08%, respectively. By comparing the absorption performance of the Fig. 3a, b, we observed that the first (A) and the third (C) frequency points of the quadband light absorber in Fig. 3b are very close to the frequency points E and F of the unperforated rectangular resonator in Fig. 3a. These characteristics show that the absorption mechanisms of the frequency points A and C of the perforated rectangular resonator should be respectively consistent to the mechanisms of the frequency points E and F of the unperforated rectangular resonator. The slight frequency differences should be due to the introduction of the air hole in the rectangular resonator.
To reveal the absorption mechanism of the frequency points E and F of the unperforated rectangular resonator, we give the electric (E) and magnetic (Hy) field distributions of the two points E and F, as shown in Fig. 4a–d. It can be seen from Fig. 4b, d that the Hy field distributions of the frequency points E and F are both primarily concentrated on the lossy dielectric layer. These distribution features show that the frequency points E and F are the localized responses of the unperforated rectangular resonator. The distribution of the magnetic field in the dielectric layer can lead to the accumulation of charge (or electric field) in the edges of the unperforated rectangular resonator [28, 39]. The E fields shown in Fig. 4a, c clearly demonstrate the excitation of electric field in the edges of the unperforated rectangular resonator. Furthermore, for frequency point E in Fig. 4b, there is only one strong field accumulation area in the lossy dielectric layer, which means that the frequency point E is the firstorder localized resonance of the unperforated rectangular resonator [40, 41]. Different from the case of Fig. 4b, three field accumulation areas are observed for frequency point F in Fig. 4d. As a result, the frequency point F should be the thirdorder localized response of the unperforated rectangular resonator [40,41,42,43]. As mentioned at the end of the previous paragraph, the mechanism of the frequency points A and C in the perforated rectangular resonator should be the same as that of the frequency points E and F in the unperforated rectangular resonator, respectively. Therefore, we have reason to believe that the frequency points A and C should be respectively the firstorder and thirdorder responses of the perforated rectangular resonator. In order to provide sufficient evidence, we need to analyze their field distributions.
We now provide the nearfield distributions of the frequency points A, B, C, and D of the perforated rectangular resonator to reveal the physical mechanisms of the quadband light absorber, as shown in Fig. 4e–l. It can be seen from Fig. 4f of the frequency point A that there is only one strong magnetic field distribution area in the dielectric layer of the suggested quadband absorber device. Three accumulation areas (two strong and a weak) in Fig. 4j are found in the lossy dielectric layer of the quadband absorption device for frequency point C. Meanwhile, the E field distributions of frequency points A in Fig. 4e and C in Fig. 4i are both mainly focused on the edges of the perforated rectangular resonator. Therefore, the frequency points A and C in Fig. 2a or Fig. 3b should be the firstorder and thirdorder localized responses of the perforated rectangular resonator, respectively [40, 41]. These field distributions provide the sufficient evidence to show that the physical mechanisms of the frequency points A and C in Figs. 2a or 3b are consistent with the frequency points E and F in Fig. 3a, respectively.
For frequency point B in Fig. 4h, only one very strong field distribution is observed in the right side of the lossy dielectric layer and the E field of the absorption mode in Fig. 4g is mainly gathered in both edges of the right side section of the perforated rectangular resonator. As a result, the frequency point B should be the firstorder localized response of the right side section of the perforated rectangular resonator. For frequency point D, we observed that its Hy field distribution is mainly focused on the left side of the lossy dielectric layer (see Fig. 4l), indicating this mode should be attributed to the firstorder localized response of the left side section of the perforated rectangular resonator. Based on the above analysis, the introduction of the air hole on the rectangular resonator can indeed play a important role in the redistribution of the nearfield patterns. The redistributed nearfield distributions come into being two new absorption modes, the frequency points B and D. As a result, quadband light absorption device can be realized in this slightly deformed rectangular resonator. Compared to the traditional design methods to obtain the multipleband absorption [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], the concept of the design possesses obvious advantages, such as simplified structure design, lowcost and easy fabrication steps, and so on.
In this manuscript, we utilize the concept of the firstorder and thirdorder resonances of the resonator to obtain the multipleband absorption response. Generally speaking, however, any resonator possesses highorder modes in addition to the firstorder response (or fundamental mode resonance), so from the theory, it can exhibit several absorption bands with high absorption coefficients within a certain frequency range. If the simulated frequency ranges are extended to the higher frequencies, one can find the other highorder modes, and the number of absorption bands with high absorption coefficients should be ideally infinite. However, the actual situation is not based on this prediction. Even if the frequency ranges are extended to higher frequencies, it is quite difficult to get a lot of (and even infinite) resonance bands having the high absorption coefficients, and typically only a maximum of two highorder resonance modes and a fundamental mode resonance can be achieved [40, 41, 47,48,49]. Two kinds of reasons can account for this phenomenon. Firstly, it is difficult to simultaneously achieve nearly perfect absorption at multiple different frequency bands (> 3) due to different optimal dielectric thicknesses required for the different resonance modes. In other words, it is impossible to realize the excellent absorption (simultaneous > 90%) of the multipleband peaks based on the superposition of the fundamental mode and several (even infinite) highorder modes [40, 41, 46,47,48]. Secondly, the diffraction effects of the resonance structure can also considerably affect the absorption coefficients of the resonance peaks in fundamental mode and highorder responses and thus specific numerical investigation of the highorder modes to ensure that diffraction effects do not significantly influence their absorption performance [47,48,49]. The two points are the main reasons for not being able to obtain infinite nearly perfect absorption peaks even though the frequency ranges are extended to higher frequencies. Additionally, it is important to note that it is extremely difficult to obtain the evenorder resonant modes under the normally condition (such as the vertically irradiated electromagnetic waves) because the electric field of the incident light must possess vertical components in the plane of incidence [49].
To give an intuitive demonstration, the dependence of the absorption spectra on the extended frequency ranges of the resonance device is provided in Fig. 2b. As shown, there are only four clear resonance modes (i.e., the original frequency points A, B, C, and D) with high absorption coefficients when the frequency ranges are extended to 4 THz, to 6 THz, and even to 8 THz. In the frequency ranges of (3~6) THz and (3~8) THz, some low absorption rates and unpredictable resonance modes can be found. This kind of feature indicates that we cannot obtain more resonance modes with high absorption coefficients and the expected frequencies when the frequency ranges are extended to higher frequencies. That is to say, the number of absorption bands cannot increase further (and even ideally infinite) with high absorption coefficients when the frequency ranges are extended to higher frequencies, which can be attributed to two reasons for the preceding paragraph.
Furthermore, we found that the absorption coefficients of these frequency points can be significantly affected when the frequency ranges are extended to higher frequencies. It can be seen from the curves of dark yellow, blue, and red of the Fig. 2b that the absorption coefficients of the first three frequency points are significantly decreased with the extending of the frequency ranges. Particularly, when the frequency range is extended to 8 THz, the absorption of the second frequency point is 67.69%; at the same time, the average absorption of the first three frequency points A, B, and C is only about 77.56%, which is much lower than the nearly perfect (or 100%) absorption of the first three frequency points in frequency range of the original (0.2~3) THz. Therefore, in this manuscript, we only discuss the resonance peaks (i.e., the modes A, B, C, and D) with high absorption coefficients of the frequency range of (0.2~3) THz without considering the cases of the low absorption coefficients and the unpredictable frequencies of the modes in the frequency ranges of (3~6) THz and (3~8) THz.
We next investigate whether the designed quadband light absorber can be incorporated into sensor to detect or monitor the change of the refractive index (RI) of surroundings, which are covered above the metallic resonator. Figure 5a shows the dependence of the absorption spectra on the change of the RI of the cover materials. It can be seen that the frequency shifts of the frequency points A and B are nearly absent (only 0.01 THz) when the RI is changed from vacuum n = 1.00 to n = 1.04 in intervals of 0.01, while frequency changes of the frequency points C and D are quite remarkable. The frequency change of the frequency point C is about 0.046 THz, and the shift of the frequency for the frequency point D can be up to 0.122 THz. In fact, the bulk refraction index sensitivity (S) is an intuitive factor to describe sensing performance of the resonance structure, and the sensitivity S can be defined as [44, 45]: S = Δf/Δn, where Δf is the change of the resonance frequency and Δn is the change of the RI. According to the definition, the S values of the frequency points A, B, C, and D are respectively 0.25, 0.25, 1.15, and 3.05 THz/RIU. Compared with the S values of the frequency points A, B, and C, the S enhancement factors for the frequency point D can be as high as 12.2, 12.2, and 2.65, respectively. The large S value of the frequency point D has potential applications in sensorrelated areas.
Besides the sensing sensitivity S, the FOM (figure of merit) is a more significant factor to estimate the sensor quality and allows a direct comparison of sensing performance among different sensors. The definition of the FOM is [44, 45]: FOM = Δf/(Δn × FWHM) = S/FWHM, where S and FWHM are the sensing sensitivity and the full width at half maximum of the resonance mode, respectively. Based on the S values and the FWHM of the four resonance modes, the FOMs of the frequency points A, B, C, and D are 1.92, 1.92, 11.5, and 101.67, respectively. The FOM of the frequency point D is about 52.95, 52.95, and 8.84 times larger than that of the frequency points A, B, and C, respectively. More importantly, the FOM of the frequency point D is much larger than previous works operated at the terahertz frequency range having the values of not exceeding 5 [18, 48,49,50,51]. Due to these excellent characteristics, the design of the multipleband light absorber is promising in sensorrelated fields.
Conclusions
In conclusion, singlesized quadband terahertz metamaterial absorber is demonstrated, which is designed by a perforated rectangular resonator on a lossy dielectric layer placed on a gold board. Four discrete and narrowband resonance bands are achieved in the singlesized resonator, of which the first three bands have the large average absorption rates of 97.80% and the fourth band has high Q value of 98.33. The physical pictures of the designed device are explored; it is found that the corresponding nearfield distributions of the four bands are different. Moreover, the dependence of the absorption on the refraction index change of the surroundings (which are covered above the singlesized resonator) is investigated to explore the device sensing performance. The FOM of the fourth band can reach 101.67, which is much larger than that of the first three modes and even previous works [18, 50,51,52,53]. These superior features, including high Q value and large FOM, will be beneficial to the design and development of simple sensors for gas sensing and monitoring, material detection, and biomedical diagnostics.
Abbreviations
 EM:

Electromagnetic
 FOM:

Figure of merit
 Q :

Quality factor
 S :

Sensing sensitivity
References
 1.
Pendry JB (2004) A chiral route to negative refraction. Science 306:1353
 2.
Pendry JB (2000) Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys Rev Lett 85:3966
 3.
Cai W, Chettiar UK, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM (2007) Optical cloaking with metamaterials. Nat Photon 1:224
 4.
Kabashin AV, Evans P, Pastkovsky S, Hendren W, Wurtz GA, Atkinson R, Pollard R, Podolskiy VA, Zayats AV (2009) Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing. Nat Mater 8:867
 5.
IA AIN, Jansen C, Koch M (2008) Miniaturized bandpass filter based on metamaterial resonators: a conceptual study. J Phys D 41:205002
 6.
Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Padilla WJ (2008) Perfect metamaterial absorbers. Phys Rev Lett 100:207402
 7.
Kravets VG, Schedin F, Jalil R, Britnell L, Gorbachev RV, Ansell D, Thackray B, Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Kabashin AV, Grigorenko AN (2013) Singular phase nanooptics in plasmonic metamaterials for labelfree singlemolecule detection. Nat Mater 12:304
 8.
Samson ZL, MacDonald KF, Angelis FD, Gholipour B, Knight K, Huang CC, Fabrizio ED, Hewak DW, Zheludev NI (2010) Metamaterial electrooptic switch of nanoscale thickness. Appl Phys Lett 96:143105
 9.
Chen HT, Padilla WJ, Cich MJ, Azad AK, Averitt RD, Taylor AJ (2009) A metamaterial solidstate terahertz phase modulator. Nat. Photon. 3:148
 10.
Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J, Cheng Q (2015), Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials, Light. Science & Applications 3:e218.
 11.
Hao J, Wang J, Liu X, Padilla WJ, Zhou L, Qiu M (2010) High performance optical absorber based on a plasmonic metamaterial. Appl Phys Lett 96:251104
 12.
Wang BX, Zhai X, Wang GZ, Huang WQ, Wang LL (2015) A novel dualband terahertz metamaterial absorber for a sensor application. J Appl Phys 117:014504
 13.
Wang BX, Wang GZ, Sang T (2016) Simple design of novel tripleband terahertz metamaterial absorber for sensing application. J Phys D 49:165307
 14.
Wang BX (2017) Quadband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on the combing of the dipole and quadrupole resonances of two SRRs. IEEE J Select Top Quantum Electron 23:4700107
 15.
Chen HT (2012) Interference theory of metamaterial perfect absorbers. Opt Express 20:7165
 16.
Huang L, Chowdhury DR, Ramani S, Reiten MT, Luo SN, Azad AK, Taylor AJ, Chen HT (2012) Impact of resonator geometry and its coupling with ground plane on ultrathin metamaterial perfect absorbers. Appl Phys Lett 101:101102
 17.
Yao LF, Li MH, Zhai XM, Wang HB, Dong JF (2016) On the miniaturization of polarization insensitive wide angle metamaterial absorber. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122:61
 18.
Cong L, Tan S, Yahiaoui R, Yan F, Zhang W, Singh R (2015) Experiment demonstration of ultrasensitive sensing with terahertz metamaterial absorbers: a comparison with the metasurfaces. Appl Phys Lett 106:031107
 19.
Kim JH, Hokmabadi MP, Balci S, Rivera E, Wilbert D, Kung P, Kim SM (2016) Investigation of robust flexible conformal THz perfect metamaterial absorber. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122:362
 20.
Wang BX, Huang WQ, Wang LL (2017) Ultranarrow terahertz perfect light absorber based on surface lattice resonance of a sandwich resonator for sensing applications. RSC Adv 7:42956
 21.
Hokmabadi MP, Zhu M, Kung P, Kim SM (2015) Comprehensive study of terahertz metamaterial absorber by applying a hybrid approach on its circuit analogue. Opt Mater Express 5:1772
 22.
Ma Y, Chen Q, Grant J, Saha SC, Khalid A, Cumming DRS (2011) A terahertz polarization insensitive dual band metamaterial absorber. Opt Lett 36:945
 23.
Shen X, Cui TJ, Zhao J, Ma HF, Jiang WX, Li H (2011) Polarizationindependent wideangle tripleband metamaterial absorber. Opt Express 19:9401
 24.
Shen X, Yang Y, Zang Y, Gu J, Han J, Zhang W, Cui TJ (2012) Tripleband terahertz metamaterial absorber: design, experiment, and physical interpretation. Appl Phys Lett 101:154102
 25.
Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh S, Srivastava KV (2013) Triple band polarizationindependent metamaterial absorber with bandwidth enhancement at Xband. J Appl Phys 114:094514
 26.
Bhattacharyya S, Srivastava KV (2014) Triple band polarizationindependent ultrathin metamaterial absorber using electric fielddriven LC resonator. J Appl Phys 115:064508
 27.
Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh S, Srivastava KV (2014) Equivalent circuit model of an ultrathin polarizationindependent triple band metamaterial absorber. AIP Adv 4:097127
 28.
Zhang B, Hendrickson J, Guo J (2013) Multispectral nearperfect metamaterial absorbers using spatially multiplexed plasmon resonance metal square structures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30:656
 29.
Kearney B, Alves F, Grbovic D, Karunasiri G (2013) Al/SiOx/Al single and multiband metamaterial absorbers for terahertz sensor applications. Opt Eng 52:013801
 30.
Chen J, Hu Z, Wang S, Huang X, Liu M (2016) A tripleband, polarizationand incident angleindependent microwave metamaterial absorber with interference theory. Eur Phys J B 89:14
 31.
Kollatou TM, Dimitriadis AI, Assimonis SD, Kantartzis NV, Antonopoulos CS (2014) Multiband, highly absorbing, microwave metamaterial structures. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 115:555
 32.
Ye Q, Liu Y, Lin H, Li M, Yang H (2012) Multiband metamaterial absorber made of multigap SRRs structure. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 107:155
 33.
Li H, Yuan LH, Zhou B, Shen XP, Cheng Q, Cui TJ (2011) Ultrathin multiband gigahertz metamaterial absorbers. J Appl Phys 110:014909
 34.
Dayal G, Ramakrishna SA (2013) Design of multiband metamaterial perfect absorbers with stacked metaldielectricdisks. J Opt 15:055106
 35.
Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh S, Chaurasiya D, Srivastava KV (2015) Bandwidthenhanced dualband duallayer polarizationindependent ultrathin metamaterial absorber. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 118:207
 36.
Su Z, Yin J, Zhao X (2015) Terahertz dualband metamaterial absorber based on graphene/MgF2 multilayer structures. Opt Express 23:1679
 37.
Liu S, Zhuge J, Ma S, Chen H, Bao D, He Q, Zhou L, Cui TJ (2015) A bilayered quadband metamaterial absorber at terahertz frequencies. J Appl Phys 118:245304
 38.
Kajtar G, Kafesaki M, Economou EN, Soukoulis CM (2016) Theoretical model of homogeneous metalinsulatormetal perfect multiband absorbers for the visible spectrum. J Phys D 49:055104
 39.
Ye YQ, Jin Y, He S (2010) Omnidirectional, polarizationinsensitive and broadband thin absorber in the terahertz regime. J Opt Soc Am B 27:498
 40.
Dayal D, Ramakrishna SA (2014) Multipolar localized resonances for multiband metamaterial perfect absorbers. J Opt 16:094016
 41.
Dayal D, Ramakrishna SA (2015) Flexible metamaterial absorbers with multiband infrared response. J Phys D 48:035105
 42.
Wang BX (2017) Singlepatterned metamaterial structure enabling multiband perfect absorption. Plasmonics 12:95
 43.
Wang BX, Wang GZ, Sang T, Wang LL (2017) Sixband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on the combination of multipleorder responses of metallic patches in a duallayer stacked resonance structure. Sci Rep 7:41373
 44.
Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zhao J, Duyne RPV (2008) Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat Mater 7:442
 45.
Yu X, Shi L, Han D, Zi J, Braun PV (2010) High quality factor metallodielectric hybrid plasmonicphotonic crystals. Adv Funct Mater 20:1910
 46.
Grady NK, Heyes JE, Chowdhury DR, Zeng Y, Reiten MT, Azad AK, Taylor AJ, Dalvit DAR, Chen HT (2013) Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction. Science 340:1304
 47.
Sellier A, Teperik TV, Lustrac A (2013) Resonant circuit model for efficient metamaterial absorber. Opt Express 21:A997
 48.
Li X, Liu H, Sun Q, Huang N (2015) Ultrabroadband and polarizationinsensitive wideangle terahertz metamaterial absorber. Photon Nanostruct Fundam Appl 15:81
 49.
Hao J, Zhou L, Qiu M (2011) Nearly total absorption of light and heat generation by plasmonic metamaterials. Phys Rev B 83:165107
 50.
Hu X, Xu G, Wen L, Wang H, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Cumming DRS, Chen Q (2016) Metamaterial absorber integrated microfluidic terahertz sensors. Laser Photon Rev 10:962
 51.
Yahiaoui R, Tan S, Cong L, Singh R, Yan F, Zhang W (2015) Multispectral terahertz sensing with highly flexible ultrathin metamaterial absorber. J Appl Phys 118:083103
 52.
Yahiaoui R, Strikwerda AC, Jepsen PU (2016) Terahertz plasmonic structure with enhanced sensing capabilities. IEEE Sensors J 16:2484
 53.
AINaib I (2017) Biomedical sensing with conductively coupled terahertz metamaterial resonators. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 23:4700405
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11647143), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20160189), Jiangsu Provincial Research Center of Light Industrial Optoelectronic Engineering and Technology (Grant No. BM2014402), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. JUSRP115A13), and the Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant Nos. 2017114Z and 201710295031X).
Availability of Data and Materials
All date are fully available without restriction.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
BXW conceived the research and supervised the whole work. QX and GD conducted the simulations and analyses and wrote the manuscript. WQH assisted in processing the data and figures. All authors read and approved the finial manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Q., Dong, G., Wang, B. et al. Design of QuadBand Terahertz Metamaterial Absorber Using a Perforated Rectangular Resonator for Sensing Applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 137 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167101825675
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Metamaterial
 Quadband absorption
 Terahertz
 Sensing