Skip to main content

Advertisement

Design Principles for Nanoparticle Plasmon-Enhanced Organic Solar Cells

Abstract

Plasmonic metallic nanoparticles are coupled to the organic solar cells to overcome the trade-off between the light absorption and carrier collection. They are usually located inside or outside of the active layers. However, no detailed comparison was reported on the light absorption difference when nanoparticles are located inside or outside of the active layers. In this paper, we compare light-trapping abilities of Ag nanospheres in organic solar cells when they are located inside and outside of the photoactive layer. We show that large-sized nanoparticles are preferred when they are placed outside of the active layer while small-sized nanoparticles are favored in the case of embedding nanoparticles in the homogenous active layer.

Background

Organic solar cells (OSCs) are ideal candidates to replace mainstream inorganic solar cells for achieving cost-effective photovoltaics (PVs) due to advantages of OSCs including lightweight, low-cost, low-temperature fabrication process, semi-transparency, and mechanical flexibility [1, 2]. Recent progress of OSCs has demonstrated over 10% power conversion efficiency (PCE) based on single-junction devices, which put them in direct competition with their Si and GaAs counterparts. Single-junction terrestrial OSCs achieved an efficiency of 11.2 ± 0.3 measured under the global AM1.5 spectrum (1000 W/m2) at 25 °C [2]. A polymer enables a solution-processed tandem solar cell with certified 10.6% power conversion efficiency under standard test conditions [3]. A new polymer donor (PBDB-T-SF) and a new small molecule acceptor (IT-4F) for fullerene-free OSCs were designed and synthesized, yielding a PCE of 13.1% [4]. Ternary organic solar cells offering a PCE of 14% was reported [5]. Although the efficiency has broken up to 10%, the whole scale market is not mature to compete with the Si solar cells. The key challenge in OSCs lies in boosting the efficiency above 10% under an industrial fabrication process. Due to the intrinsic low charge-carrier mobility and exciton diffusion properties of organic molecules, the thickness of OSCs is limited and thus curbs the light absorption of OSCs. To circumvent the trade-off between light absorption and carrier collection, during past decades, many light-trapping schemes have been proposed, such as quantum dot solar cell [6,7,8,9], nanowire solar cell [10, 11], and plasmonic solar cell [6, 12, 13]. The plasmonic solar cells provide a practical way to boost the light harvesting of solar cells while maintaining their carrier collection efficiency [14]. The noble metallic nanoparticles (NPs) incorporated in solar cells can improve efficiency by creating highly concentrated near-field, increasing pathlength via far-field scattering and waveguide coupling [15]. For example, previous simulations on plasmon-enhanced inorganic solar cells have adopted 10–100-nm-thick active layers for proof-of-concept demonstrations [12, 16,17,18].

In the mainstream OSCs design process, the plasmonic metallic NPs are located outside/inside the active layers. Embedding metallic NPs in active layers of OSCs exploits the strongly confined field of the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and more efficient light scattering within the active layers while introducing metallic NPs outside the active layer(s) can be accomplished by coupling the NPs on indium tin oxide (ITO) or inside a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) buffer layer. However, there is no comparison to distinguish the influence of plasmonic NPs when they are introduced into these two structures. In this paper, we compare light-trapping abilities of the NPs when they are placed inside and outside the active layers. Our work provides a design principle for NP plasmon-enhanced OSCs.

Methods

All the simulations were carried out by using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method solving Maxwell’s equations. During the scattering cross-sectional simulations, a total-field scattered-field (TFSF) source in the wavelength ranging from 300 to 700 nm was injected into a box containing the NPs. Here, we choose the Ag in the simulation because its plasmonic resonance is well fitted to the absorption spectra of the P3HT:PCBM [19, 20]. Cathode Al material was taken from ref. [21]. The complex refractive index (n, k) of ITO and Ag were fitted from refs. [21, 22], respectively. The n and k of PEDOT: PSS and a blend of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) were fitted from refs. [23, 24], respectively, as replotted in Fig. 1a, b. The thicknesses of ITO, PEDOT: PSS and P3HT: PCBM are 100, 40, and 200 nm, respectively. In our simulation, we choose the PEDOT: PSS as the buffer layer and the P3HT: PCBM as the active layer [14, 24]. The normalized scattering/absorption cross sections, Qscat/Qabs, are defined by scattering/absorption cross section divided by geometric cross section of NPs. The fraction of light scattered into the substrate, fsub, is defined as the power scattered towards the substrate divided by total scattered power. For Ag NPs, override mesh settings dx = dy = dz = 0.1, 0.5, and 1 nm were chosen for small- (5, 10 nm), medium- (20, 40 nm), and large-sized (60, 80 nm) NPs, respectively, while an automatic mesh generation method was used in other simulation regions. We define small- (5, 10 nm), medium- (20, 40 nm), and large-sized (60, 80 nm) NPs based on published experimental work [25, 26]. We decreased the mesh size and set perfectly matched layer (PML) parameters until the results were convergent.

Fig. 1
figure1

The complex refractive index n and extinction coefficient k of PEDOT: PSS a and P3HT: PCBM b in the FDTD simulation

Result and Discussion

As shown in Fig. 2a, b, the architectures correspond to the case when Ag NPs are located inside or outside of the active layer. In the practical fabrication process, thickness of the PEDOT: PSS layer is ~ 50 nm and the active layer is ~ 200 nm. In our simulation, these two layers are set to be 40 and 200 nm, respectively. For NPs located within the active layer, it does not affect the calculated result when NPs are in homogenous material. For NPs located outside of the active layer, although many publications use NPs embedded in PEDOT:PSS totally, there are some publications use large NPs beyond thickness of the PEDOT: PSS layer [27, 28]. Therefore, it is applicable in experimental fabrication. The n of ITO and PEDOT: PSS (400–800 nm) is ~ 2.1–1.6 and ~ 1.55–1.45, respectively. The difference of n is not obvious. According to an approximation theory for absorption and scattering cross-sectional calculation [15], the differences in the cross sections between fully covered and partially covered NPs in PEDOT: PSS are fairly small. Therefore, we can conclude that it slightly affects the calculated results when NPs are larger than the thicknesses of PEDOT:PSS and active layers. The role of plasmonic effects of NPs for light trapping is also illustrated in the structures. Requirements of light-trapping ability are different between the two structures. In Fig. 2a, since the NPs are located outside of the active organic layer, the near-field enhancement has a limited impact on the absorption enhancement because only near-field at the bottom of NPs contribute to the absorption enhancement. Moreover, as the diameter increases, the near-field of large NPs penetrates a longer distance, away from the surface of the NPs [29]. As the diameter increases, the scattering effect will become stronger according to Mie theory. Therefore, it is unnecessary to take the near-field enhancement into account when NPs are located outside of the active layer. However, the NPs in the active layers benefit from near-field enhancement, increasing its effective absorption cross section and thus exciton dissociation, as shown in Fig. 2b.

Fig. 2
figure2

Schematic illustration of light trapping through scattering and local field enhancement in a NPs located outside of the active layer and b NPs located inside of the active layer

NPs Located Outside of the Active Layers

Although light absorption enhancement in plasmonic NP-based OSCs is observed, the bare metallic NPs in the active layer also induce charge recombination and exciton quenching near the vicinity of metal surface due to dipole-dipole and charge-trapping coupling [12, 30]. As size increases, charge recombination and exciton quenching will become more serious [31, 32]. In order to suppress the exciton quenching and charge-trapping effect of NPs, three remedies can be introduced: coating a thin dielectric layer on metallic NPs [12, 30], forming NPs by laser ablation in liquids [33], and placing NPs outside active layer [14, 28]. As discussed in the above section, when NPs are located outside of the active layers, the scattering properties of NPs are critical for light trapping. Therefore, the fraction of light scattered underneath the active layer, fsub, is compared among the NPs with different diameters as shown in Fig. 3a. The trends of fsub increase as the size of NPs increases, which disagrees with the Ag NPs located on the Si surface as calculated in ref. [17]. As can be seen from Fig. 3a, an evident dip occurs at ~ 550 nm, meaning a large amount of light is scattered towards the back and is wasted. However, it is difficult to judge scattering contributions of different-sized NPs because they have different fsub values. Therefore, we plot the total Qscat and Qscat for light scattered into the substrate, as shown in Fig. 3b. As size increases, the total Qscat of large-sized NPs have large values which exceed that of the medium- and small-sized NPs within a broadband spectrum. The large-sized NPs with large scattering Qscat behave as effective subwavelength scattering elements that couple and trap sunlight into the photoactive layer and thus the optical pathlength is enhanced [16].

Fig. 3
figure3

a The fraction of light scattered into the active layer. b Total scattering cross section (solid), cross section for light scattered into the substrate (dashed line), all normalized to geometrical cross section

Al cathode in the OSCs not only serves as contact but also acts as a mirror, prolonging the pathlength of the light in an active layer. Therefore, we further investigate their scattering properties when Al cathode is presented. In the simulation, a 150-nm Al is contacted with the active layer. Figure 4 demonstrates the fsub of various NPs. As can be seen from Fig. 4a, fsub are significantly improved after introducing the Al mirror. However, the Qscat of NPs are slightly influenced, as demonstrated in Fig. 4b. No matter whether the Al mirror is presented, the large-sized NPs demonstrate large scattering cross sections and a large amount of light is scattered into the substrates. Therefore, the large-sized NPs are favored when NPs are located outside of the active layer from point of optical simulation.

Fig. 4
figure4

a The fraction of light scattered into the active layer with Al cathode presenting. b Total scattering cross section (solid) and cross section for light scattered into the substrate (dashed line) with Al cathode presenting, all normalized to geometrical cross sections

NPs Located Inside of the Active Layers

While NPs are located in the matrix of the active layer, the far-field scattering and near-field enhancement influence OSCs simultaneously. For NPs with sizes well below the wavelength of light in the quasi-static limit, the scattering/absorption cross section can be interpreted by Eq. 1 [15]:

$$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{sca}}=\frac{1}{6\pi }{\left(\frac{2\pi }{\lambda}\right)}^4{\left|{\alpha}_{\mathrm{sp}}\right|}^2,\cdot {\sigma}_{\mathrm{abs}}=\frac{2\pi }{\lambda}\mathit{\operatorname{Im}}\left[{\alpha}_{\mathrm{sp}}\right] $$
(1)

where αsp is the polarizability of the sphere:

$$ {\alpha}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{p}}=4\uppi {r}^3\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{m}}-{\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{s}}}{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{m}}+2{\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{s}}} $$
(2)

where the εm and εs are the permittivities of the surrounding material and of the sphere, respectively. In the case when NPs are outside, the surrounding dielectric environment is complicated and it can be calculated by approximation in a homogenous environment [15]. The Qscat and Qabs are plotted in Fig. 5a, b, respectively. Absorption dominates for small NPs embedding in the active layer with diameters in the range 5 to 10 nm. The plasmonic near-field is coupled to the active layer and thus increases the absorption cross section that improves exciton dissociation. However, Qscat is much lower than that of NPs located outside of the active layer. The scattering efficiency, Qsc, defined by Qscat/(Qscat + Qabs), is shown in Fig. 5c to evaluate either scattering or absorption dominates. Qscat values of all NPs are no more than 0.5, suggesting absorption dominates from 300 to 700 nm. Therefore, enhanced absorption cross sections of NPs are critical when they are embedding in a homogeneous matrix, rather than scattering cross sections as in the outside case. Figure 6 demonstrates absorption spectra of active layers coupled with NPs. Small NPs have obvious absorption enhancement, but as size increases, the absorption spectra deteriorate. Although light absorption can be boosted by scattering of large-sized NPs, increased scattering cannot compensate decreased absorption, as illustrated in Fig. 5a, b. For electrical consideration, increased Qabs in small NPs can be used in OSCs to improve exciton dissociation while large NPs give rise to recombination and exciton quenching [25]. As size increases, charge recombination and exciton quenching will become more serious [31]. Therefore, small NPs are preferred when they are covered in the active layer.

Fig. 5
figure5

Normalized scattering cross section (a), absorption cross section (b), and scattering efficiency (c) of different-sized NPs in the homogeneous active layer

Fig. 6
figure6

Absorption color map of different-sized NPs in the homogeneous active layer with Al cathode contacted with the active layer

Conclusions

In conclusion, the light-trapping abilities of Ag NPs located inside and outside of the active layer are investigated. When the NPs are located outside of the active layer, the fraction of light scattered into the active layer is crucial. Large-sized NPs have large scattering cross sections and a large amount of light is preferably scattered under the photoactive layer. On the other hand, an absorption cross section is essential when NPs are embedding in the homogeneous active layer. Small-sized NPs can boost light absorption of OSCs due to their large absorption cross sections. We believe that the results of our study might pave the way towards cost-effective OSC devices, and this approach may be applicable to OSC systems featuring other types of active materials.

Abbreviations

FDTD:

Finite-difference time-domain

ITO:

Indium tin oxide

LSPR:

Localized surface plasmon resonance

NPs:

Nanoparticles

OSCs:

Organic solar cells

P3HT:

Poly(3-hexylthiophene)

PCBM:

[6,6]-Phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester

PCE:

Power conversion efficiency

PEDOT: PSS:

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrene sulfonate)

PML:

Perfectly matched layer

PVs:

Photovoltaics

TFSF:

Total-field scattered-field

Reference

  1. 1.

    Gan Q, Bartoli FJ, Kafafi ZH (2013) Plasmonic‐enhanced organic photovoltaics: Breaking the 10% efficiency barrier. Adv Mater 25:2385–2396

  2. 2.

    Green MA, Emery K, Hishikawa Y, Warta W, Dunlop ED (2015) Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 45). Prog Photovolt Res Appl 23:1–9

  3. 3.

    You J, Dou L, Yoshimura K, Kato T, Ohya K, Moriarty T, Emery K, Chen C-C, Gao J, Li G (2013) A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat Commun 4:1446

  4. 4.

    Zhao W, Li S, Yao H, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Yang B, Hou J (2017) Molecular optimization enables over 13% efficiency in organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 139:7148–7151

  5. 5.

    Xiao Z, Jia X, Ding L (2017) Ternary organic solar cells offer 14% power conversion efficiency. Sci Bull 62:1562–1564

  6. 6.

    Wu J, Yu P, Susha AS, Sablon KA, Chen H, Zhou Z, Li H, Ji H, Niu X, Govorov AO, Rogach AL, Wang ZM (2015) Broadband efficiency enhancement in quantum dot solar cells coupled with multispiked plasmonic nanostars. Nano Energy 13:827–835

  7. 7.

    Yu P, Wu J, Gao L, Liu H, Wang Z (2017) InGaAs and GaAs quantum dot solar cells grown by droplet epitaxy. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 161:377–381

  8. 8.

    Lu HF, Mokkapati S, Fu L, Jolley G, Tan HH, Jagadish C (2012) Plasmonic quantum dot solar cells for enhanced infrared response. Appl Phys Lett 100:103505

  9. 9.

    Nozik AJ (2002) Quantum dot solar cells. Phys E 14:115–120

  10. 10.

    Yu P, Wu J, Liu S, Xiong J, Jagadish C, Wang ZM (2016) Design and fabrication of silicon nanowires towards efficient solar cells. Nano Today 11:704–737

  11. 11.

    Christesen JD, Zhang X, Pinion CW, Celano TA, Flynn CJ, Cahoon JF (2012) Design principles for photovoltaic devices based on Si nanowires with axial or radial p-n junctions. Nano Lett 12:6024–6029

  12. 12.

    Yu P, Yao Y, Wu J, Niu X, Rogach AL, Wang Z (2017) Effects of Plasmonic Metal Core-Dielectric Shell Nanoparticles on the Broadband Light Absorption Enhancement in Thin Film Solar Cells. Sci Rep 7:7696

  13. 13.

    Baek S-W, Park G, Noh J, Cho C, Lee C-H, Seo M-K, Song H, Lee J-Y (2014) Au@ Ag core–shell nanocubes for efficient plasmonic light scattering effect in low bandgap organic solar cells. ACS Nano 8:3302–3312

  14. 14.

    Wu J-L, Chen F-C, Hsiao Y-S, Chien F-C, Chen P, Kuo C-H, Huang MH, Hsu C-S (2011) Surface plasmonic effects of metallic nanoparticles on the performance of polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano 5:959–967

  15. 15.

    Xu Y, Murray J, Munday JN (2014) Photonics and Plasmonics for Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance. In: Wu J, Wang MZ (eds) Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Springer New York, New York, pp 349–382

  16. 16.

    Ferry VE, Verschuuren MA, Li H, Verhagen E, Walters RJ, Schropp REI, Atwater HA, Polman A (2010) Light trapping in ultrathin plasmonic solar cells. Opt Express 18:A237–A245

  17. 17.

    Catchpole KR, Polman A (2008) Design principles for particle plasmon enhanced solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 93:191113

  18. 18.

    Peng Y, Fanlu Z, Ziyuan L, Zhiqin Z, Alexander G, Lan F, Hoe T, Chennupati J, Zhiming W (2018) Giant optical pathlength enhancement in plasmonic thin film solar cells using core-shell nanoparticles. J Phys D Appl Phys 51:295106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aacb1089d

  19. 19.

    Tan H, Santbergen R, Smets AHM, Zeman M (2012) Plasmonic light trapping in thin-film silicon solar cells with improved self-assembled silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett 12:4070–4076

  20. 20.

    Pfeiffer T, Ortiz-Gonzalez J, Santbergen R, Tan H, Ott AS, Zeman M, Smets A (2014) Plasmonic nanoparticle films for solar cell applications fabricated by size-selective aerosol deposition. Energy Procedia 60:3–12

  21. 21.

    Haynes WM (2014) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Boca Raton, CRC press

  22. 22.

    König TA, Ledin PA, Kerszulis J, Mahmoud MA, El-Sayed MA, Reynolds JR, Tsukruk VV (2014) Electrically tunable plasmonic behavior of nanocube–polymer nanomaterials induced by a redox-active electrochromic polymer. ACS Nano 8:6182–6192

  23. 23.

    Chen C-W, Hsiao S-Y, Chen C-Y, Kang H-W, Huang Z-Y, Lin H-W (2015) Optical properties of organometal halide perovskite thin films and general device structure design rules for perovskite single and tandem solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3:9152–9159

  24. 24.

    Lee W, Chuang S, Chen H, Su W, Lin C (2010) Exploiting optical properties of P3HT: PCBM films for organic solar cells with semitransparent anode. Thin Solid Films 518:7450–7454

  25. 25.

    Stratakis E, Kymakis E (2013) Nanoparticle-based plasmonic organic photovoltaic devices. Mater Today 16:133–146

  26. 26.

    Arinze ES, Qiu B, Nyirjesy G, Thon SM (2015) Plasmonic Nanoparticle Enhancement of Solution-Processed Solar Cells: Practical Limits and Opportunities. Acs Photonics 3

  27. 27.

    Fleetham T, Choi J-Y, Choi HW, Alford T, Jeong DS, Lee TS, Lee WS, Lee K-S, Li J, Kim I (2015) Photocurrent enhancements of organic solar cells by altering dewetting of plasmonic Ag nanoparticles. Sci Rep 5:14250

  28. 28.

    Hao Y, Song J, Yang F, Hao Y, Sun Q, Guo J, Cui Y, Wang H, Zhu F (2015) Improved performance of organic solar cells by incorporating silica-coated silver nanoparticles in the buffer layer. J Mater Chem C 3:1082–1090

  29. 29.

    Deeb C, Zhou X, Plain J, Wiederrecht GP, Bachelot R, Russell M, Jain PK (2013) Size Dependence of the Plasmonic Near-Field Measured via Single-Nanoparticle Photoimaging. J Phys Chem C 117:10669–10676

  30. 30.

    Zhang W, Saliba M, Stranks SD, Sun Y, Shi X, Wiesner U, Snaith HJ (2013) Enhancement of perovskite-based solar cells employing core–shell metal nanoparticles. Nano Lett 13:4505–4510

  31. 31.

    You J, Leonard K, Takahashi Y, Yonemura H, Yamada S (2014) Effects of silver nanoparticles with different sizes on photochemical responses of polythiophene–fullerene thin films. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:1166–1173

  32. 32.

    Shahin S, Gangopadhyay P, Norwood RA (2012) Ultrathin organic bulk heterojunction solar cells: Plasmon enhanced performance using Au nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 101:053109

  33. 33.

    Yang G (2007) Ultrathin organic bulk heterojunction solar cells: Plasmon enhanced performance using Au nanoparticles. Prog Mater Sci 52:648–698

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, LüLiang University.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Author information

JW and PY designed the simulation and analyzed the data. JW, SJ, YC, and WW prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed the simulated results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Juanjuan Wang or Peng Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Organic solar cell
  • Plasmonic
  • Scattering
  • Field enhancement
  • FDTD
  • Nanoparticle