Skip to main content

In Situ High-Pressure X-ray Diffraction and Raman Spectroscopy Study of Ti3C2Tx MXene

Abstract

The lattice stability and phonon response of Ti3C2Tx MXene at high pressure are important for understanding its mechanical and thermal properties fully. Here, we use in situ high hydrostatic pressure X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy to study the lattice deformation and phonon behavior of Ti3C2Tx MXene. XRD spectra indicate that no phase transformation occurs up to the pressure of 26.7 GPa. The elastic constant along a lattice parameter was calculated to be 378 GPa. In the Raman spectra obtained at high-pressure, the out-of-plane phonon modes (A1g at ~ 210, ~ 504, and ~ 711 cm−1) exhibit monotonic blueshifts with increasing pressure. The Grüneisen parameters of these three modes were calculated to be 1.08, 1.16, and 0.29, respectively. These results enrich the basic property data of Ti3C2Tx MXene and would benefit the further understanding of this novel material.

Background

After the intensive studies of graphene [1] and transition metal dichalcogenides(TMDs) [2,3,4,5] for a decade, two-dimensional (2D) metal carbides (MXenes) have been drawing much attention recently owing to their extraordinary electrical properties [6, 7]. The Ti3C2 MXene is a layered material with Van der Waals stacked structure, in which each layer contains two carbon atom planes sandwiched among three Ti atom planes. In the energy band structure of Ti3C2 MXene, the conduction band touches the valence band at the Γ point, which indicates that Ti3C2 MXene is a half-metallic material [8]. More interestingly, the band structure of Ti3C2 Mxene can be opened up slightly by the surface functional groups (which are annotated as “T” in the formula) [8], such as –F, –O, and –OH [9]. These functional groups are generated in the solution etching of MnAlCn + 1 phase [9], which then forms a Ti3C2Tx MXene with tunable electrical properties. The electrical conductivity of Ti3C2Tx MXene was measured to be 4.2 × 10−4S/m [10], which is superior to most TMDs. To date, Ti3C2Tx MXenes have shown potential applications in advanced supercapacitors [11], Li-batteries [12], electromagnetic shielding [10], antibacterial [13], and light emission [14].

In addition to high electrical conductivity, the elastic property of Ti3C2Tx MXene also attracts much attention. Theoretical calculations predicted that this ultrathin carbide has a Young’s modulus of as high as ~ 500 GPa [15,16,17]. Lipatov et al. recently used nanoindentation to determine that the Young’s modulus of monolayer Ti3C2Tx MXene was 330 Gpa [18]. These values are much higher than those of MoS2 [18] and are comparable to those of monolayer graphene [19]. Recently, Ghidiu et al. measured the high-pressure X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of Ti3C2Tx MXene up to 3 GPa and observed no phase transformation [20]. However, as the pressure loaded in ref. [20] was too low, the phase stability and lattice deformation of Ti3C2Tx at higher pressure are still unknown.

Raman spectroscopy acts as a useful non-destructive tool to investigate the crystal structure and phonon vibration of 2D materials such as graphene [21] and TMDs [2]. The composition of Ti2CTx [22] and phase stability of Ti3C2Tx Mxene at different annealing conditions [10] can be probed by using confocal Raman measurements. Recently, the phonon dispersion of Ti3C2Tx MXene was theoretically calculated by Hu et al. [23, 24], thus enabling a further understanding of the Raman spectra of this material. However, the high-pressure Raman spectroscopy of Ti3C2Tx is still lacking. Moreover, the phonon response of Ti3C2Tx as a function of pressure is unknown.

In this paper, we prepared Ti3C2Tx thin flakes and measured their pressure-dependent XRD and Raman spectra up to 26.7 GPa. The elastic constants of Ti3C2Tx were calculated from XRD diffraction peak shifts by the Murnaghan equation. The positive Grüneisen parameters of out-of-plane phonons were obtained from their pressure-dependent Raman shift and lattice parameter deformation ratio. The obtained results would benefit the further understanding of the mechanical and phonon-vibrational behavior of Ti3C2Tx MXene.

Results and Discussions

Before conducting high-pressure measurements, we first investigated the basic material properties of the exfoliated Ti3C2Tx Mxene flakes. An optical image of the exfoliated Ti3C2Tx flakes deposited on Si/SiO2 (300 nm) substrate is shown in Fig. 1a. Light green contrast can be observed for the exfoliated flakes. As reported by Miranda et al., the optical contrast of Ti3C2Tx flakes depends on the flake thickness strongly, where thicker flakes always show higher contrast, while thin flakes exhibit low contrast [25]. The light green contrast of most of the flakes in Fig. 1b indicates their thin thickness. An atomic force microscope (AFM) topographic image of exfoliated Ti3C2Tx flakes is shown in Fig. 1b. The flakes in the mapping area show surfaces with high roughness, which is typical for Ti3C2Tx flakes [26]. The thickness of a typical thin flake can be determined from its line profile (inset of Fig. 1b) across the marked position in Fig. 1b to be 170 nm. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of an exfoliated flake is shown in Fig. 1c. The laminated structure of Ti3C2Tx can be seen clearly, indicating the successful preparation of Ti3C2Tx layered samples [10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Optical image of ultrasonically exfoliated Ti3C2Tx flakes; b AFM topographic image of ultrasonically exfoliated Ti3C2Tx flakes, and a line profile across the marked dashed line is shown as an inset, indicating the Ti3C2Tx flake thickness of 170 nm; c SEM image of ultrasonically exfoliated Ti3C2Tx flakes; d XRD spectra of Ti3C2Tx raw powder

We further measured the XRD spectra of raw Ti3C2Tx powder, as shown in Fig. 1d. This XRD pattern is an analogy to previous reports [10]; thus, the prominent peaks at 8.95°, 18.28°, and 27.7° can be assigned to the diffractions of (002), (004), and (006) planes. Compared to the prominent peaks, the intensity of diffraction peaks of minor phases (anatase TiO2(101) at 25.3°, JCPDS Card No. 71-1116) is relatively weak, indicating the high purity of Ti3C2Tx phase in the obtained powder. The (002) peak emerges at an angle slightly lower than that reported by Han et al. (9.21°) [10]. The calculated c lattice parameter, 19.66 Å, is larger than the reported value (19.2 Å) [10]. It should be noted that since the interlayer space may be tuned by different densities of chemical groups and ions, such as –F, –OH, and Li+, the c lattice parameter varies substantially from 19.2 Å to 58.8 Å in different studies [10, 20, 26, 27]. The c lattice parameter for our sample is very close to the low value that was measured for Ti3C2Tx powder simply using HF as etchant [10].

The XRD spectra of Ti3C2Tx flakes measured at different pressures until 26.7 GPa are shown in Fig. 2a. It can be seen that the spectra measured at different pressures are similar to each other, while no new diffraction peak can be found. This finding indicates no phase transformation occurs with the pressure up to 26.7 GPa. In Fig. 2a, all the diffraction peaks shift to large angles with increasing pressure, indicating the shrinkage of the Ti3C2Tx lattice. Such pseudo-negative compressibility has also been observed for Ti3C2Tx [20] and other low dimensional materials with a layered structure, such as graphite [28], graphene oxide [29, 30], MoS2 [31], clay [32], and titanates [33]. The (002) peak shifts from 2.883° to 3.162° as the pressure increased from 1.8 GPa to 26.7 GPa. The deformation ratio of lattice parameter c, c/c0, as a function of pressure, can be calculated from the shift of (002) peak. Moreover, the deformation ratio of a, a/a0, can be calculated from the shift of (110) peak. As shown in Fig. 2b, the lattice parameters c and a are deformed by 9.1% and 2.4%, respectively, at a pressure of 26.7 GPa. In the low-pressure region at ~ 3 GPa, the compressive ratio of lattice parameter c is 3%. In the previous high-pressure XRD measurement of Ti3C2Tx flakes, a slightly larger c compressive ratio of 4% for dry Ti3C2Tx flakes was reported by Ghidiu et al. [11](Fig. 2b). This difference could be induced by a larger lattice parameter c(25.1 Å) of the sample used by Ghidiu et al. [11] with respect to that of ours(19.66 Å).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a XRD spectra of Ti3C2Tx at different loaded pressures. Note that the unit is GPa for the pressure annotated on each spectrum. Peaks are assigned according to ref. [26]; b experimental (dots) and calculated compressive ratio (solid line) along c and a directions. The solid lines are the fitted results using the equation \( r(P)/{r}_0={\left[\left({\delta}_0/{\delta}^{\prime}\right)P+1\right]}^{\delta^{\prime }} \)

To obtain the elastic constants, the c and a compressive ratios in Fig. 2b are further fitted by using the Murnaghan equation [34].

$$ r(P)/{r}_0={\left[\left({\beta}^{\prime }/{\beta}_0\right)P+1\right]}^{-1/{\beta}^{\prime }} $$
(1)

where r represents the lattice constants along c and a axes, \( {\beta}_0^{-1}=-{\left(\frac{dlnr}{lnP}\right)}_{P=0} \) is the linear compressibility, and β is the pressure derivate of β.

The fitted r/r0 curves of a and c are plotted as solid lines in Fig. 2b. It can be seen that the experimental results fit the equation expectation very well. The best fitting generates β0 and β for c as 67.7 GPa and 25.5, respectively. While for lattice parameter a, β0 and β are calculated to be 387.4 GPa and 72.1, respectively (Table 1). For ultrathin 2D materials such as graphene, Young’s modulus (1TPa) is very close to the β0 of thick graphite [19, 28]. Therefore, β0 can be used as a substitution to evaluate the elastic constant of Ti3C2Tx. Young’s modulus of Ti3C2Tx was recently measured by Lipatov et al. to be 330 GPa [18], which is consistent with the β0 in our study. Our measured values are also comparable to the elastic constants of Ti3C2 that were calculated in other studies [15, 17] (Table 1). The β0 at c axis is larger than that of graphite (β0 = 35.7 GPa), while the β0 at a axis is smaller than that of graphite (β0 = 1250 GPa) [28]. The β0 of Ti3C2Tx is higher than the bulk modulus of MoS2 (270 Pa) [35] and is also comparable to that of graphene oxide (210 GPa) [36], indicating a high elastic constant of Ti3C2Tx Mxene among 2D materials.

Table 1 The first and second order compression coefficients of Ti3C2Tx, which are calculated by fitting Fig. 2b through Eq. 1

High-pressure Raman spectra of Ti3C2Tx samples were measured at different compressive pressures up to 25.5 GPa, as shown in Fig. 3a. The Raman spectra obtained at different decompressive pressures are shown in Fig. 3b. At low compressive pressures, Ti3C2Tx Mxene exhibits three major Raman bands at ~ 210, ~ 500, and 700 cm−1. It should be noted that the Raman spectra of Ti3C2Tx MXene vary significantly in different kinds of literature. Hu et al. [23] reported strong Raman peaks at ~ 200 cm−1 and 720 cm−1, while other bands at 400 cm−1 were quite broad. However, Han et al. [10] and Zhu et al. [37] observed a sharp peak at ~ 200 cm−1, but other bands were all broad. Xue et al. [14] only observed broad peaks from 100 to 700 cm−1. The Raman spectra in Fig. 3 are different from those in ref. [10, 14, 23, 37]. This difference could be induced by different types and concentrations of chemical groups on Ti3C2Tx MXene. Further interpretation of these different Raman bands needs to recall the phonon dispersion of Ti3C2Tx that was theoretically calculated by Hu et al. [23, 24]. The space group of Ti3C2Tx was P63/mmc [23]. The number of atoms (N) in a primitive cell of Ti3C2Tx was calculated to be 7, 7, and 9 for T = −O, −F, and −OH, respectively, given x = 2. At Γ point of the first Brillouin zone, the following optical phonons are predicted to be existing for different Ti3C2Tx MXenes: Γoptical (Ti3C2O2) = 6Eg + 3A1g, Γoptical (Ti3C2F2, Ti3C2 (OH)2) = 8Eg + 4A1g [23]. The atom vibrations of different Raman active modes of Ti3C2F2 and Ti3C2(OH)2 are illustrated schematically in Table 2. Their frequencies were theoretically calculated by Hu et al. [23] and are listed in Table 2. For Ti3C2(OH)2, there are four out-of-plane modes (A1g: 218, 514, 684, and 3734 cm−1) and four in-plane modes (Eg: 138, 278, 437, and 622 cm−1). For Ti3C2F2, there are three A1g modes (190, 465, and 694 cm− 1) and three Eg modes (128, 231, and 612 cm− 1) [23].

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Raman spectra of Ti3C2Tx flakes at different compression pressures; b Raman spectra obtained at different decompression pressures. Note that the unit of pressures in a and b is GPa

Table 2 Assignment of typical Raman peaks in this work and reference. The theoretically calculated phonon energies of Ti3C2(OH)2 and Ti3C2F2 are listed for comparison. The vibration directions of atoms in a unit cell are also shown schematically. The unit of Raman shift is cm−1

However, it can be seen the calculated phonon frequencies of pure Ti3C2F2 or Ti3C2(OH)2 cannot fit the experimental Raman spectra of Ti3C2Tx in Fig. 3. Because the surface of Ti3C2Tx is usually attached by a different type of chemical groups, a full interpretation of the experimental Raman spectra in Fig. 3 needs to consider the hybridized vibration modes of −F and −OH [23]. In a previous research [23], the Raman bands at ~ 200, ~ 500, and ~ 700 cm−1 were assigned to ω2, ω6, and ω3, respectively. Following this instruction, the prominent Raman bands at 205.6, 490.2, and 702.5 cm−1 of Fig. 3a, b can be assigned to ω2, ω6, and ω3 modes, respectively. Interestingly, these modes are all out-of-plane modes. Other Raman modes are difficult to be isolated from their neighboring modes due to their low intensities. To obtain robust data by eliminating the uncertainties, only these three modes are considered in the following calculations and analyses.

In Fig. 3a, b, it can also be seen that the relative intensities of these in-plane modes increase with the increasing compressive pressures (Fig. 3a). When the compressive pressure is ≥ 12.6 GPa, a new peak at ~ 600 cm−14) emerges and becomes the prominent peak. In the decompression process, the intensities of this ω4 mode decrease significantly. The Raman spectra obtained at 0 GPa of decompression pressure contain almost all the in-plane and out-of-plane phonon modes. Such emergence of in-plane modes at high compressive pressure might be related with flake fracture or orientation rotation-induced polarization. Research about this effect is still ongoing and will be reported in the future.

With increasing pressure from 0.8 GPa to 25.6 GPa, ω2, ω6, and ω3 all show monotonic increasing blueshifts (Fig. 4ad), which are similar to the pressure-dependent blueshifts of graphite [28] and MoS2 [31]. At 25.6 GPa, these three modes’ blueshifts are 66.7, 85.1, and 60 cm−1, respectively. Such pressure-dependent blueshifts are much larger than those of MoS2 [31]. To quantify the Raman shift vs pressure, the Raman shift plots in Fig. 4a, b, d were fitted using the following equation [28]:

$$ \omega (P)/{\omega}_0={\left[\left({\delta}_0/{\delta}^{\prime}\right)P+1\right]}^{\delta^{\prime }} $$
(2)
Fig. 4
figure 4

Raman shifts of different phonon modes as a function of different compressive pressures (solid sphere) and decompressive pressures (opened circles): a 210 cm−1, b 504 cm−1, c 620 cm−1, and d 711 cm−1. Solid lines are the fitting results using the equation \( \omega (P)/{\omega}_0={\left[\left({\delta}_0/{\delta}^{\prime}\right)P+1\right]}^{\delta^{\prime }} \)

where δ0 and δ are the logarithmic pressure derivative(dlnω/dP)P = 0 and the pressure derivative of dlnω/dP, respectively. The fitted results are plotted as solid lines in Fig. 4a, b, d. Due to the high uncertainties at the low-pressure region, the Raman mode at 620 cm−1 was not fitted. It can be seen in Fig. 4a, b, d that the fitted curves are consistent with the experimental results, indicating the high accuracy of the fitting process. The obtained parameters of δ0 and δ are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Calculated pressure-dependent parameters of Ti3C2Tx. \( \overline{\upgamma} \) refers to the averaged Grüneisen parameters that were calculated using equation γ =  − dlnω/(3dlnr)

For anisotropic 2D materials with an atomic thickness, such as MXene and graphene, two independent components of the Grüneisen tensors are usually associated with the strains that are parallel and perpendicular to the c axis. For simplicity, we adopted the scaling relationship proposed by Zallen et al. [38], which has been used to fit the pressure-dependent Raman shift of graphite by Hanfland et al. [28]

$$ \omega (P)/{\omega}_0={\left[r(P)/{r}_0\right]}^{3\gamma } $$
(3)

where r refers to the in-plane and out-of-plane lattice constants for intralayer and interlayer modes, respectively. γ is equivalent to the Grüneisen parameter that was defined in other studies [39, 40].

As only the out-of-plane modes are observed in the compression process, c lattice parameter as a function of hydrostatic pressure is adequate for calculation. We adopted the (002) plane’s space distance data of 0 to 26.7 GPa in Fig. 2b for the calculation of Grüneisen parameter γ. The averaged \( \overline{\upgamma} \) up to 26.7 GPa for ω2, ω6, and ω3 were calculated to be 1.08, 1.16, and 0.29, respectively (Table 2). Similar to the graphite, the smaller \( \overline{\upgamma} \) of ω3 compared with the other two modes indicates a smaller change in force constants is involved in the rigid-layer motion [28]. To the best of our knowledge, the Grüneisen parameters of Ti3C2Tx have not been reported yet. However, we can still compare our data with other 2D materials. Zha et al. reported Grüneisen parameters as 4–5 for acoustic phonon modes of Ti2CO2 [41]. Because the Grüneisen parameters of high-frequency optical modes are usually one or two orders lower than those of the low-frequency modes [28], the Grüneisen parameters for optical phonons of Ti2CO2 can be estimated to be 0.05–0.5, which are similar to those of our values for Ti3C2Tx. Recently, Peng et al. [42] reported the Grüneisen parameters at room temperature as 1.22, 1.20, and 1.15 for MoS2, MoSe2, and WS2, respectively, which are larger than our results. Our results are also smaller than those of graphene (1.99 for E2g mode) [40] and graphite (1.06 for E2g mode) [28]. This finding indicates that Ti3C2Tx MXene has the weakest bonding anharmonicity among these ultrathin 2D materials [42].

Conclusions

In conclusion, we measured lattice deformation and phonon response of Ti3C2Tx thin flakes at different hydrostatic pressures up to 26.7 GPa. No phase transformation has been observed below a pressure of 26.7 GPa. All the phonon modes show a positive frequency shift with increasing pressures. The positive Grüneisen parameters of three out-of-plane phonons are calculated to be 1.08, 1.16, and 0.29. Our results increase understanding of the mechanical and thermal properties of Ti3C2Tx at high pressures.

Methods

Ti3C2Tx powder was prepared by a method reported by reference [43]. Briefly, Ti3AlC2 powder (Forsman, 10 g) was etched by HF solution (160 ml) at room temperature for 5 h. The obtained Ti3C2Tx powder was dispersed into DI water and ultrasonically exfoliated at a power of 700 W. The resulted solution was separated after being stored by 24 h. The obtained upper layer solution was used for further Raman, atomic force microscope (AFM), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra at ambient pressure were measured using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, MiniFlex600). SEM images were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Su1510). In situ high-pressure XRD measurements were performed at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility by a gasket high-pressure diamond anvil cell (DAC) at room temperature. To produce a hydrostatic environment around the sample, we used methanol/ethanol/water (16:3:1) as a pressure transmitting medium. The pressure was determined by the pressure-dependent spectral shift of the sharp ruby fluorescence R1 line. The sample was placed in a stainless steel gasket hole (100 μm in diameter) with a diamond culet (400 μm in diameter). High-pressure Raman scattering measurements were performed using a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. The topographical measurements were conducted on an AFM instrument (Bruker, Innova).

The fitting of diffraction peak positions and Raman peak shifts was conducted on OriginPro package. A user-defined function, y = (A1 × x + 1)A2, was used by setting A1 and A2 as the fitting parameters. Proper fitting can be obtained easily by a simplex method.

Abbreviations

2D:

Two dimensional

AFM:

Atomic force microscope

DAC:

Diamond anvil cell

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

TMDs:

Transition metal dichalcogenides

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

References

  1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kin Fai M, Changgu L, Hone J, Jie S, Heinz TF (2010) Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105(13):136805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim C-Y, Galli G, Wang F (2010) Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett 10(4):1271–1275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Su W, Li Y, Chen L, Huo D, Song K, Huang X, Shu H (2018) Nonstoichiometry induced broadband tunable photoluminescence of monolayer WSe2. Chem Commun 54(7):743–746

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Su W, Kumar N, Mignuzzi S, Crain J, Roy D (2016) Nanoscale mapping of excitonic processes in single-layer MoS2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. Nanoscale 8(20):10564–10569

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Naguib M, Come J, Dyatkin B, Presser V, Taberna P-L, Simon P, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y (2012) MXene: a promising transition metal carbide anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 16(1):61–64

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Come J, Naguib M, Rozier P, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y, Taberna PL, Morcrette M, Simon P (2012) A non-aqueous asymmetric cell with a Ti2C-based two-dimensional negative electrode. J Electrochem Soc 159(8):A1368–A1373

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang Q, Zhou Z, Shen P (2012) Are MXenes promising anode materials for Li ion batteries? Computational studies on electronic properties and Li storage capability of Ti3C2 and Ti3C2X2 (X = F, OH) monolayer. J Am Chem Soc 134(40):16909–16916

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naguib M, Mashtalir O, Carle J, Presser V, Lu J, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW (2012) Two-dimensional transition metal carbides. ACS Nano 6(2):1322–1331

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han M, Yin X, Wu H, Hou Z, Song C, Li X, Zhang L, Cheng L (2016) Ti3C2 MXenes with modified surface for high-performance electromagnetic absorption and shielding in the X-band. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8(32):21011–21019

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghidiu M, Lukatskaya MR, Zhao M-Q, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW (2014) Conductive two-dimensional titanium carbide ‘clay’ with high volumetric capacitance. Nature 516(7529):78–U171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mashtalir O, Naguib M, Mochalin VN, Dall'Agnese Y, Heon M, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y (2013) Intercalation and delamination of layered carbides and carbonitrides. Nat Commun 4:1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasool K, Helal M, Ali A, Ren CE, Gogotsi Y, Mahmoud KA (2016) Antibacterial activity of Ti3C2Tx MXene. ACS Nano 10(3):3674–3684

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xue Q, Zhang H, Zhu M, Pei Z, Li H, Wang Z, Huang Y, Huang Y, Deng Q, Zhou J, Du S, Huang Q, Zhi C (2017) Photoluminescent Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots for multicolor cellular imaging. Adv Mater 29(15):1604847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bai Y, Zhou K, Srikanth N, Pang JHL, He X, Wang R (2016) Dependence of elastic and optical properties on surface terminated groups in two-dimensional MXene monolayers: a first-principles study. RSC Adv 6(42):35731–35739

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borysiuk VN, Mochalin VN, Gogotsi Y (2015) Molecular dynamic study of the mechanical properties of two-dimensional titanium carbides Tin+1Cn (MXenes). Nanotechnology 26(26):265705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ning Z, Yu H, Sanaz Y, Mohsen Asle Z (2018) Superior structural, elastic and electronic properties of 2D titanium nitride MXenes over carbide MXenes: a comprehensive first principles study. 2D Mater 5(4):045004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lipatov A, Lu H, Alhabeb M, Anasori B, Gruverman A, Gogotsi Y, Sinitskii A (2018) Elastic properties of 2D Ti3C2Tx MXene monolayers and bilayers. Sci Adv 4(6):eaat0491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghidiu M, Kota S, Drozd V, Barsoum MW (2018) Pressure-induced shear and interlayer expansion in Ti3C2 MXene in the presence of water. Sci Adv 4(1):eaao6850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov KS, Roth S, Geim AK (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97(18):187401

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai S, Jeon J, Jang SK, Xu J, Choi YJ, Park J-H, Hwang E, Lee S (2015) Surface group modification and carrier transport properties of layered transition metal carbides (Ti2CTx, T: -OH, -F and -O). Nanoscale 7(46):19390–19396

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu T, Wang J, Zhang H, Li Z, Hu M, Wang X (2015) Vibrational properties of Ti3C2 and Ti3C2T2 (T = O, F, OH) monosheets by first-principles calculations: a comparative study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(15):9997–10003

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu T, Hu M, Li Z, Zhang H, Zhang C, Wang J, Wang X (2015) Covalency-dependent vibrational dynamics in two-dimensional titanium carbides. J Phys Chem A 119(52):12977–12984

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miranda A, Halim J, Lorke A, Barsoum MW (2017) Rendering Ti3C2Tx (MXene) monolayers visible. Mater Res Lett 5(5):322–328

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hantanasirisakul K, Zhao M-Q, Urbankowski P, Halim J, Anasori B, Kota S, Ren CE, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y (2016) Fabrication of Ti3C2Tx MXene transparent thin films with tunable optoelectronic properties. Adv Electron Mater 2(6):1600050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghidiu M, Halim J, Kota S, Bish D, Gogotsi Y, Barsourm MW (2016) Ion-exchange and cation solvation reactions in Ti3C2 MXene. Chem Mater 28(10):3507–3514

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanfland M, Beister H, Syassen K (1989) Graphite under pressure: equation of state and first-order Raman modes. Phys Rev B 39:12598

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Talyzin AV, Solozhenko VL, Kurakevych OO, Szabo T, Dekany I, Kurnosov A, Dmitriev V (2008) Colossal pressure-induced lattice expansion of graphite oxide in the presence of water. Angew Chem Int Edit 47(43):8268–8271

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Talyzin AV, Sundqvist B, Szabo T, Dekany I, Dmitriev V (2009) Pressure-induced insertion of liquid alcohols into graphite oxide structure. J Am Chem Soc 131(51):18445–18449

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chi Z-H, Zhao X-M, Zhang H, Goncharov AF, Lobanov SS, Kagayama T, Sakata M, Chen X-J (2014) Pressure-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide. Phys Rev Lett 113(3):036802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. You S, Kunz D, Stoeter M, Kalo H, Putz B, Breu J, Talyzin AV (2013) Pressure-induced water insertion in synthetic clays. Angew Chem Int Edit 52(14):3891–3895

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakano S, Sasaki T, Takemura K, Watanabe M (1998) Pressure-induced intercalation of alcohol molecules into a layered titanate. Chem Mater 10(8):2044–2046

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murnaghan FD (1944) The compressibility of media under extreme pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 30(9):244

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bertolazzi S, Brivio J, Kis A (2011) Stretching and breaking of ultrathin MoS2. ACS Nano 5(12):9703–9709

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Suk JW, Piner RD, An J, Ruoff RS (2010) Mechanical properties of mono layer graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4(11):6557–6564

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu J, Tang Y, Yang C, Wang F, Cao M (2016) Composites of TiO2 nanoparticles deposited on Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets with enhanced electrochemical performance. J Electrochem Soc 163(5):A785–A791

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zallen R (1974) Pressure-Raman effects and vibrational scaling laws in molecular crystals: S8 and As2S3. Phys Rev B 9:4485

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohiuddin TMG, Lombardo A, Nair RR, Bonetti A, Savini G, Jalil R, Bonini N, Basko DM, Galiotis C, Marzari N, Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Ferrari AC (2009) Uniaxial strain in graphene by Raman spectroscopy: G peak splitting, Gruneisen parameters, and sample orientation. Phys Rev B 79(20):205433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Proctor JE, Gregoryanz E, Novoselov KS, Lotya M, Coleman JN, Halsall MP (2009) High-pressure Raman spectroscopy of graphene. Phys Rev B 80(7):073408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zha X-H, Huang Q, He J, He H, Zhai J, Francisco JS, Du S (2016) The thermal and electrical properties of the promising semiconductor MXene Hf2CO2. Sci Rep 6:27971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peng B, Zhang H, Shao H, Xu Y, Zhang X, Zhu H (2016) Thermal conductivity of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and WS2: interplay of mass effect, interatomic bonding and anharmonicity. RSC Adv 6(7):5767–5773

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Naguib M, Kurtoglu M, Presser V, Lu J, Niu J, Heon M, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW (2011) Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv Mater 23(37):4248–4253

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. LY18F040006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61504034, 61306115, 61775201, and 11404309).

Availability of Data and Materials

We declare that the materials used in this manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work is carried out by the collaboration between all the authors. LZ, WS, and LF synthesized the Ti3C2Tx ultrathin flakes and conducted the sample characterization and the data analysis. YH conducted the high-pressure Raman and XRD measurements. KS and XH conducted the XRD data analysis. JY and CL prepared the raw Ti3C2Tx samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weitao Su or Yanwei Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Su, W., Huang, Y. et al. In Situ High-Pressure X-ray Diffraction and Raman Spectroscopy Study of Ti3C2Tx MXene. Nanoscale Res Lett 13, 343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2746-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2746-4

Keywords

  • Ti3C2Tx MXene
  • High-pressure XRD
  • High-pressure Raman
  • Grüneisen parameter