Skip to content


  • Nano Express
  • Open Access

Three-Dimensional Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold for Flexible Supercapacitors

Nanoscale Research Letters201914:98

  • Received: 7 January 2019
  • Accepted: 7 March 2019
  • Published:


Herein, a 3D composite electrode supported by g-C3N4 nanowire framework as scaffold and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) as conducting polymer is reported for flexible solid-state electrochemical capacitors. Compared to pure PEDOT: PSS, the composite electrodes have a greatly increased specific surface and showed good electrochemical performance. A specific capacitance of 202 F g−1 is achieved, and 83.5% of initial capacitance maintained after 5000 cycles. The device based on the 3D g-C3N4/PEDOT: PSS electrode also exhibits good performance in capacitance, flexibility, and cycling stability.


  • Electrochemical supercapacitor
  • 3D g-C3N4
  • Flexible device


Wearable energy storage devices, especially flexible supercapacitors, are getting extra attention due to their higher cycling stability and power density [14]. As for material systems of supercapacitor electrodes, recent researches mainly focus on three principle types: carbon-based high surface area materials (activated carbon, graphene, carbon fibers, and so on), transition metal oxides (MOs), and conducting polymers (CPs) [58]. The storage mechanism of the first type is electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) while the others are pseudocapacitors [911]. Compared to EDLCs, the pseudocapacitors with Faradaic charge storage mechanism show higher specific capacitance, which become an essential part of high-performance supercapacitors. MOs possess high theoretical capacities. However, low conductivity, toxicity, poor stability, and high cost restrict the application of MOs. In contrast, CPs overcoming these problems are suffering the constraint of relatively low mechanical and cycle ability. What is more, the low specific surface is one of the most disadvantages which impede the application of CPs in flexible energy story device.

So far, each of the materials mentioned above has strengths and weaknesses, and none of them is ideal. In order to enhance the performance of devices, compositing materials and optimizing structure are both effective strategies. As for flexible supercapacitors, the composite of 3D EDLC materials and MO (or CPs) pseudocapacitance materials, which keep high electrochemical performance (capacitance, stability) along with well mechanical performance (flexible, light), becomes one of the most suitable choices [1214]. Although carbon-based materials acted as EDLC materials get some satisfying results, new candidates with competitive performance, low cost, easy fabrication, and eco-friendly properties are still drawing researchers’ attention.

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), a two-dimensional graphene derivative, has been explored due to its interesting electronic feature, low cost, and high environmental-friendly features [15, 16]. In recent years, the application field of g-C3N4 is mainly focused on photocatalysis [1722]. Few investigations on the application of supercapacitor for g-C3N4 got competitive results. Its energy storage potentials are far from fully developed since the molecular structure advantage is not totally explored. The most commonly used microstructure of g-C3N4 was a 2D structure, while 3D g-C3N4 structure was rarely reported [2327]. On the other hand, (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) as a kind of CP is extensively utilized in ES electrode. PEDOT: PSS has high conductivity and relatively much higher chemical and mechanical stability which are basic requirements for wearable energy storage devices. In order to improve its capacitance, enlarging its active surface area is the most direct and effective strategy.

Herein, a 3D g-C3N4/PEDOT: PSS composite material has been developed where g-C3N4 nanowire (GCNW) acts as a 3D skeleton structure supporting PEDOT: PSS. The composite materials achieve a specific capacitance of 202 F g−1, meanwhile exhibiting an excellent electrochemical performance in the form of all-solid-state flexible supercapacitor. The as-prepared device possessed excellent flexibility and stability. Moreover, the effect of g-C3N4 ratio on the structure and electrochemical properties had been studied in detail.



Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and urea were obtained from Beijing Chemical Corp. PEDOT: PSS solution (1.0 wt.% in H2O, high-conductivity grade) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. None of the above products have been further purified.

Synthesis of g-C3N4

This preparation used urea as the precursor. Ten grams of urea was heated to 550 °C (10 °C min−1) and kept for 2 h in a muffle furnace, producing the yellow powder.

Three-Dimensional Fabrication of the GCNW

Briefly, 500 mg CN power was mixed with 20 ml of aqueous NaOH and stirred at 60 °C for 12 h. The sealed flasks were ultrasonic cleaned for 2 h. The suspension was dialyzed to remove the excess NaOH. The final pure g-C3N4 nanowire aerogel was obtained through freeze-drying.

Three-Dimensional Preparation of GCNW/PEDOT: PSS Composite Material

The composite materials were prepared with different mass ratios of g-C3N4 nanowire hydrogels (6 mg ml−1) to PEDOT: PSS, namely 10%, 20%, 50%, and 80% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS. The homogeneous solution had been gotten after 12 h of stirring. Finally, the product was obtained using the freeze-drying process. The pure PEDOT: PSS thin film was prepared by filtration method for comparison.


The morphologies and structures of samples were characterized by field emission scanning microscopy (FESEM, 7610, JEOL), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai F20), and D-MAX II A X-ray diffractometer (XRD). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was carried out using Nicolet-6700 (Thermofisher). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were tested with ESCALABMK II X-ray photoelectron spectrometer.

Electrochemical Measurement

Electrochemical performance was carried out using a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation. In the three-electrode configuration, the platinum foil and saturated calomel (SCE) electrodes were used as counter and reference electrodes. The working electrodes were prepared by pressing the composite on a carbon cloth with a loading amount 1 mg cm−2. The electrolyte was 1 M H2SO4. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves were tested at the potential range of 0 V to 1 V. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were recorded under an open circuit potential in the frequency range of 1–105 Hz with a modulating amplitude of 5 mV.

For the two-electrode devices, 2 mg of active material was loaded on the carbon cloth as working electrodes. Then, a small amount of H2SO4/PVA hydrogel was dripped on the non-woven fabric (NKK-MPF30AC-100) as a separator. Finally, the separator was placed between two working electrodes to assemble a symmetrical capacitor. Electrochemical testing of two electrodes was carried out in a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation.

The specific capacitance of a single electrode (Cm) was calculated using the charge integrated from CV curves according to the following formulas:
$$ {C}_m=\frac{1}{Uvm}{\int}_{U^{-}}^{U^{+}}i(U)\mathrm{d}U $$
where U is the voltage window (U=U+-U), m is the mass of active materials in one electrode, and ν is scan rate (mv s−1) of the CV curve.
Subsequently, the energy density (E) and power density (P) of ES were calculated using the following formulas:
$$ E=\frac{1}{2}C{U}^2 $$
$$ P=\frac{E}{\Delta t} $$
where C is the specific capacitance value of the supercapacitor, U is the voltage window, and Δt is the discharge time in GCD.

Results and Discussion

The experimental procedures and flexible device are shown in Fig. 1. As can be seen, the mass ratio of the composite can affect its structure significantly; the as-prepared composite can hold a well 3D structure when the GCNW mass ratio is not lower than 20%, while the 3D structure would be wrecked as the concentration of PEDOT: PSS was too high (90%). What is more, the concentrations of sodium hydroxide have a substantial influence on the microstructure of g-C3N4 (Additional file 1: Figures S1–S3). When the concentration of sodium hydroxide is lower than 3 M, the layer structure of g-C3N4 cannot be cut sufficiently, and no self-supporting 3D structure can be acquired. When the concentration of sodium hydroxide was too high (like 8 M), the GCNW would be cut short, and the 3D structure also collapsed after the freeze-drying process. In this work, 3 M is a suitable concentration for sodium hydroxide treatment due to the well self-supporting 3D structure.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The experimental procedures of GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite material and flexible device

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Fig. 2a and b demonstrate the transformation of g-C3N4 from layer structure to wire structure, and then, the 3D framework has been achieved using the freeze-drying process. Moreover, the 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite preserves the 3D framework as shown in Fig. 2c. The digital photograph of the sample appears in the corresponding insets. Comparing the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of g-C3N4 and GCNW in Fig. 2d and e, the as-prepared GCNW exhibits 10 nm in width and hundreds of nanometers in length, which is very suitable as a skeleton material. Figure 2f is the as-prepared GCNW after freeze-drying, which indicated a clear 3D structure. The TEM image of 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S4 where the 3D structure can also be distinguished. The 3D composite structure can increase the electrochemical active sites and narrow the ion transport distances, which would be a benefit for the improvement of capacitance. Based on the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller measurement (BET) results (Additional file 1: Figure S5), the specific surface of GCNW and 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS is 82.67 m2 g−1 and 69.86 m2 g−1, respectively. It is worthy to mention that the specific surface of pure PEDOT: PSS is extremely low while the as-prepared pure g-C3N4 nanosheets can reach up to 149.45 m2 g−1, but both of their capacitances are low. The detail of electrochemical characters will be discussed later.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Structure characterization. FESEM images of g-C3N4 (a), GCNW (b), and 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS (c). TEM images of g-C3N4 (d), GCNW (e), and 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS (f) with 3D structure

The crystal structures of the sample are shown in Fig. 3a. The GCNW has two clear peaks at 13.84° and 27.81° corresponding to (100) and (200) planes of g-C3N4, respectively [15]. The broad diffraction peak ranging from 15° to 30° is attributed to PEDOT: PSS [28], and the intensity weakened with the increase of GCNW ratio. The fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were studied to investigate the atomic structure of the as-prepared samples (Fig. 3b). For GCNW, several strong peaks around 804 cm−1 are due to tri-s-triazine units and that at 1299, 1350, 1431, 1533, and 1605 cm−1 are attributed to C-N heterocycles in GCNW. The peaks between 3000 and 3500 cm−1 result from −NHX and −OH vibration modes of GCNW [16, 29]. The resultant FTIR spectrum of pure PEDOT: PSS is well consistent with the previous report [30, 31]. Based on these results, the GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composites are physical mixtures where the GCNW and PEDOT: PSS hold their inherent atom structure, and the bond characters do not change. Figure 3c shows the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum of the GCNW/PEDOT: PSS. The peaks corresponding to C 1s, O 1s, N 1s, S 3p, and Na 1s are observed clearly. The Na 1s peak located at 1047.5 eV comes from the sodium hydroxide which is used to shear g-C3N4 nanosheets. The C 1s spectrum includes four peaks at 284.5 eV, 285.9 eV, 286.1 eV, and 288.3 eV which correspond to C–C, C–N, C–S, and C=O peaks, respectively (Fig. 3d). Figure 3e is an N 1s spectrum. The peak at 398.1 eV is due to sp2 N atoms in C–N=C, and the peaks at 399.4 eV and 400.9 eV are due to N in N–(C)3 and C–N–H, respectively. For the O 1s spectra in Fig. 3f, the peaks at the binding energy of 531.6eV, 532.8eV, and 533 eV are observed, which correspond to C=O, C–O and −OH, respectively. The XPS results are consistent with the previous tests and also indicate that the capacitance which was tested later only comes from the g-C3N4 and PEDOT: PSS.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

a XRD patterns and b FT-IR spectra of GCNW, PEDOT: PSS, and GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite samples with different content ratio. c XPS survey spectra of 20% GCNW. The high resolution of C 1 s (d), N 1 s (e), and O 1 s (f) XPS spectra of 20% GCNW

The performance of the GCNW/PEDOT: PSS as an electrode material for electrochemical was investigated using cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) through the three-electrode method. Figure 4a exhibits the CV results of the electrodes prepared with different mass ratios. As can be seen, there is no obvious redox peak in all of the results and the electrode of 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS gets the biggest integral area which means the maximum capacitance. Meanwhile, these results are certified by the GCD test in which the 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS electrode also exhibits the longest time of charge and discharge (Fig. 4b). Figure 4c is the result of the 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS measured at different scanning rates. With the increasing scanning rate, the curved profile has no significant change, exhibiting a good rate performance [3234]. In Fig. 4d, the GCD curves of the 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS under different current densities show good symmetry which proves a good electrochemical reversibility [35]. Fig. 4e measures the specific capacitance values of pure GCNW, PEDOT: PSS, and 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite electrodes. The specific capacitance value of 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS is 202 F g−1 at 5 mv s−1, 46.9% higher than that of pure PEDOT: PSS. To our knowledge, the present 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS electrode material is superior to previous reports for C3N4-based electrodes. In fact, this result is even higher than some carbon-based composite (Additional file 1: Table S1) [3645]. The improvement should mainly come from the 3D structure to prevent PEDOT: PSS from aggregation providing a higher active surface, which is verified by BET result. Although the specific surface of pure g-C3N4 is higher than PEDOT: PSS, the capacitance of g-C3N4 is much lower than that of PEDOT: PSS due to the material nature factor and the storage mechanism. However, the 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS electrode gets the maximum capacitance. Therefore, a suitable structure is as important as materials to get excellent performance. In this work, the capacitance of GCNW/PEDOT: PSS electrodes is improved with the GCNW ratio decrease, until it reaches 10% where the 3D structure has been destroyed as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

The electrochemical performances of GCNW, PEDOT: PSS, and GCNW/PEDOT: PSS samples with different content ratio of GCNW and PEDOT: PSS. a Cyclic voltammograms at the scan rate of 10 mv/s. b Galvanostatic discharge curves at current densities of 1 A g−1. c Cyclic voltammograms with scan rate from 5 mv s−1 to 100 mv s−1. d Galvanostatic discharge curves at various current densities. e Specific capacitances of GCNW, PEDOT: PSS, and 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS at different scan rate

The symmetric supercapacitors were prepared by assembling 20% GCNW/PEDOT: PSS pressed on a carbon cloth as an electrode (Fig. 1). Figure 5a presents the CV curve of a single device under the voltage window 0–1.0 V with different scan rates. The curve shows a good symmetrical rectangular shape, and the area exhibits a little decrease after 5000 cycles (inset). The specific capacitance is 78 F g−1 at the scanning rate of 5 mv s−1. Figure 5b is the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the device. The inset of corresponding figures shows a magnified area of the high-frequency region and the fitting circuit of impedance. The Nyquist impedance plot consisted of straight lines at low frequency and semicircular curve at the high-frequency region. The semicircle in the high-frequency zone is mainly controlled by reaction kinetics, and the low-frequency zone line is controlled by the diffusion of ions. Since C3N4 is a low conductivity material, the equivalent series resistance (ESR) value of 5.41 Ω is higher than some other works [4648]. In Fig. 5c, the capacitor maintenance rate is 83.5% after 5000 cycles under the current density of 1 A g−1. The loss mainly comes from the PEDOT: PSS component as poor cyclic stability is the fundamental shortcoming of conducting polymers [58]. Fig. 6 exhibits the flexible and stable performance of the device. In the digital photo, three devices were connected in series and the discharging voltage was 3.46 V, 3.46 V, 3.48 V, and 3. 50 V with bending angles 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, respectively. The flexible device possessed capacitance retentions over 80% after 2000 bending cycles with 90° (Additional file 1: Figure S11). The plot of energy density as a function of power density is shown in Fig. 5d. The energy density of 6.66 Wh Kg−1 is achieved at the power density of 200 W Kg−1.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a The CV curve of the single device. b The EIS of the device. c The cycling stability of the device. d Power density and energy density of the device

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

The voltage value of flexible solid-state supercapations based on 20% GCNW under different bending angles (a: 0°, b: 30°, c: 60°, d: 90°)


In summary, for the first time, 3D GCNW/PEDOT: PSS composite materials have been prepared and applied as an electrode of flexible supercapacitor successfully. Due to the improvement of the active surface, the capacitance of the composite reached 202 F g−1 in the three-electrode system and 78 F g−1 in the symmetric device at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1, resulting in a high energy density of 6.66 Wh Kg−1. The 3D structure was of great significance to enhance electrochemical performance. The as-prepared device also exhibited excellent flexible and stable performance in the bending cycle test. Taking into account the cost and preparation convenience, the results obtained herein open new prospects for 3D g-C3N4/CP composite as an efficient electrode material in flexible energy storage device and commercial applications.





Conducting polymers


Cyclic voltammetry


Electrochemical double-layer capacitors


Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy


Equivalent series resistance


Field emission scanning electron microscopy


Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy


Graphitic carbon nitride


Galavanostatic charge/discharge


g-C3N4 nanowire


Transition metal oxides


PSS: (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate)


Transmission electron microscopy


X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


X-ray diffraction patterns



The authors thank Dr. Liying Wang form the Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials, Ministry of Education, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Changchun University of Technology for the TEM characterizations.


This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61604017, 61574021), Open Subject Fund by Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser Ion and Electron Beams Ministry of Education (KF1703).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

WL and XZ conceived the idea. ZT carried out the experiments. ZT, AM, and LD took part in the experiments and the discussion of the results. XZ and ZT drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Life Science, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, China
Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials, Ministry of Education and Advanced Institute of Materials Science, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, China
Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion, and Electron Beams (Ministry of Education), Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China


  1. Weng Z, Su Y, Wang DW, Li F, Du JH, Cheng HM et al (2011) Graphene–cellulose paper flexible supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater 1(5):917–922Google Scholar
  2. Qu G, Cheng J, Li X, Yuan D, Chen P, Chen X, Wang B, Peng H et al (2016) A fiber supercapacitor with high energy density based on hollow graphene/conducting polymer fiber electrode. Adv Mater 28(19):3646–3652Google Scholar
  3. Duan LF, Zhao LJ, Cong H, Zhang XY, Lü W, Xue CL et al (2019) Plasma treatment for nitrogen-doped 3D graphene framework by a conductive matrix with sulfur for high-performance Li–S batteries. Small 15(7):e1804347Google Scholar
  4. Deng Y, Dong S, Li Z, Jiang H, Zhang X, Li X et al (2018) Applications of conventional vibrational spectroscopic methods for batteries beyond Li-ion. Small Methods 2(8):1700332Google Scholar
  5. Li H, Liu F, Fan B, Ai D, Peng Z, Wang Q et al (2018) Nanostructured ferroelectric-polymer composites for capacitive energy storage. Small Methods 2(6):1700399Google Scholar
  6. Zhang XY, Sun SH, Sun XJ, Zhao YR, Chen L, Yang Y, Lü W, Li DB (2016) Plasma-induced, nitrogen-doped graphene-based aerogels for high-performance supercapacitors. Light Sci Appl 5:e16130Google Scholar
  7. Shown I, Ganguly A, Chen LC, Chen KH (2015) Conducting polymer-based flexible supercapacitor. Energy Environ Sci 3(1):2–26Google Scholar
  8. Jia Y, Sun X, Shi Z, Jiang K, Liu H, Ben J, Li D et al (2018) Modulating the surface state of SiC to control carrier transport in graphene/SiC. Small 14(16):e1801273Google Scholar
  9. Jeong HM, Lee JW, Shin WH, Choi YJ, Shin HJ, Kang JK, Choi JW et al (2011) Nitrogen-doped graphene for high-performance ultracapacitors and the importance of nitrogen-doped sites at basal planes. Nano Lett 6(11):2472–2477Google Scholar
  10. Simon P, Gogotsi Y (2008) Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat Mater 7:320–329Google Scholar
  11. Neo WT, Ye Q, Chua SJ, Xu J (2016) Conjugated polymer-based electrochromics: materials, device fabrication and application prospects. J Mater Chem C 4:7364–7346. Google Scholar
  12. Jiang H, Lee PS, Li C (2013) 3D carbon based nanostructures for advanced supercapacitors. Energy Environ Sci 6(41):41–53Google Scholar
  13. Li BD, Sun XJ, Jia YP, Stockman MI, Paudel HP, Song H, Jiang H, Li ZM et al (2017) Direct observation of localized surface plasmon field enhancement by Kelvin probe force microscopy. Light Sci Appl 6:e17038Google Scholar
  14. Zhang Z, Xiao F, Qian L, Xiao J, Wang S, Liu Y et al (2014) Facile synthesis of 3D MnO2–graphene and carbon nanotube–graphene composite networks for high-performance, flexible, all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater 4(10):1400064–1400073Google Scholar
  15. Wang X, Maeda K, Thomas A, Takanabe K, Xin G, Carlsson JM, Domen K, Antonietti M et al (2009) A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water undervisible light. Nat Mater 8:76–80Google Scholar
  16. Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Shen Y, Zhou Q, Wang J, Liu A, Liu S, Zhang Y et al (2016) Reversible assembly of graphitic carbon nitride 3D network for highly selective dyes absorption and regeneration. ACS Nano 10(9):9036–9043Google Scholar
  17. Dong F, Zhao Z, Xiong T, Ni Z, Zhang W, Sun Y, Ho WK et al (2013) In situ construction of g-C3N4/g-C3N4 metal-free heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(21):11392–11401Google Scholar
  18. Tian J, Liu Q, Asiri AM, Sun X, He Y (2015) Ultrathin graphitic C3N4 nanofibers: hydrolysis-driven top-downrapid synthesis and application as a novel fluorosensor for rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of Fe3+. Sens Actuators B 216(9):453–460Google Scholar
  19. Ran J, Guo W, Wang H, Zhu B, Yu J, Qiao SZ et al (2018) Metal-free 2D/2D phosphorene/g-C3N4 Van der Waals heterojunction for highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Adv Mater 30(25):e1800128Google Scholar
  20. Jiang Z, Wan W, Li H, Yuan S, Zhao H, Wong PK et al (2018) A hierarchical Z-scheme α-Fe2O3/g-C3N4 hybrid for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv Mater 30(10):1706108Google Scholar
  21. Xu Q, Cheng B, Yu J, Liu G (2017) Making co-condensed amorphous carbon/g-C3N4 composites with improved visible-light photocatalytic H2-production performance using Pt as cocatalyst. Carbon 118(7):241–249Google Scholar
  22. Yao L, Wei D, Ni Y, Yan D, Hu C (2016) Surface localization of CdZnS quantum dots onto 2D g-C3N4 ultrathin microribbons: highly efficient visible light-induced H2-generation. Nano Energy 26(8):248–256Google Scholar
  23. Chang X, Zhai X, Sun S, Gu D, Dong L, Yin Y, Zhu Y et al (2017) MnO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposite with highly enhanced supercapacitor performance. Nanotechnology 28(13):135705Google Scholar
  24. Chen X, Zhu X, Xiao Y, Yang X (2015) PEDOT/g-C3N4 binary electrode material for supercapacitors. J Electroanal Chem 743(15):99–104Google Scholar
  25. Wu YZ, Yan MXH, Ren J, Dai Y, Wang JJ, Pan JM, Wang YP, Cheng XN et al (2017) Hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4 nanorods/graphitic C3N4 composite with enhanced supercapacitive performance. Mater Lett 198(1):114–117Google Scholar
  26. Chen Q, Zhao Y, Huang X, Chen N, Qu L (2015) Three-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride functionalized graphene-based high-performance supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 3:6761–1766Google Scholar
  27. Xu L, Xia J, Xu H, Yin S, Wang K, Huang L, Wang L, Li H et al (2014) Reactable ionic liquid assisted solvothermal synthesis of graphite-like C3N4 hybridized a-Fe2O3 hollow microspheres with enhanced supercapacitive performance. J Power Sources 245(1):866–874Google Scholar
  28. Yan D, Liu Y, Li Y, Zhuo R, Wu Z, Ren P, Li S, Wang J, Yan P, Geng Z et al (2014) Synthesis and electrochemical properties of MnO2/rGO/PEDOT:PSS ternary composite electrode material for supercapacitors. Mater Lett 127(15):53–55Google Scholar
  29. Choi JW, Han MG, Kim SY, Oh SGS, Im S (2004) Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanoparticles prepared in aqueous DBSA solutions. Synth Met 141(3):293–299Google Scholar
  30. Rajesh M, Raj CJ, Manikandan R, Kim BC, Park SY, Yu KH et al (2017) A high performance PEDOT/PEDOT symmetric supercapacitor by facile in-situ hydrothermal polymerization of PEDOT nanostructures on flexible carbon fibre cloth electrodes. Mater Today Energy 6(12):96–104Google Scholar
  31. Lee S, Gleason KK (2015) Enhanced optical property with tunable band gap of cross-linked PEDOT copolymers via oxidative chemical vapor deposition. Adv Funct Mater 25(1):85–93Google Scholar
  32. Choi BG, Yang MH, Hong WH, Choi JW, Yun SH (2012) 3D macroporous graphene frameworks for supercapacitors with high energy and power densities. ACS Nano 6(5):4020–4028Google Scholar
  33. Morishita T, Soneda Y, Hatori H, Inagaki M (2007) Carbon-coated tungsten and molybdenum carbides forelectrode of electrochemical capacitor. Electrochim Acta 52(7):2478–2484Google Scholar
  34. Lin T, Chen IW, Liu F, Yang C, Bi H, Xu F, Huang F et al (2015) Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbonof extraordinary capacitance for electrochemical energy storage. Science 350(6267):1508–1513Google Scholar
  35. Zhang X, Ge X, Sun S, Qu Y, Chi W, Chen C, Wei L et al (2016) Morphological control of RGO/CdS hydrogel for energy storage. CrystEngcomm 18:1090–1095Google Scholar
  36. D’Arcy JM, El-Kady MF, Khine PP, Zhang L, Lee SH, Davis NR, Liu DS, Yeung MT, Kim SY, Turner CL, Lech AT, Hammond PT et al (2014) Vapor-phase polymerization of nanofibrillar poly (3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene) for supercapacitors. ACS Nano 8(2):1500–1510Google Scholar
  37. Zhu Y, Li N, Lv T, Yao Y, Peng H, Shi J, Cao S, Chen T et al (2018) Ag–doped PEDOT:PSS/CNT composites for thin–film all–solid–state supercapacitors with a stretchability of 480%. J Mater Chem A 6:941–947Google Scholar
  38. Anothumakkool B, Bhange SN, Soni R, Kurungot S (2015) Novel scalable synthesis of highly conducting and robust PEDOT paper for high performance flexible solid-supercapacitor. Energy Environ Sci 8:1339–1347Google Scholar
  39. Li Y, Ren G, Zhang Z, Teng C, Wu Y, Lu X, Zhu Y, Jiang L et al (2016) Strong and highly flexible aramid nanofibers/PEDOT:PSS film for all-solid-state supercapacitor with superior cycling stability. J Mater Chem A 4:17324–17332Google Scholar
  40. Anothumakkool B, Torris ATA, Bhange SN, Badiger MV, Kurungot S (2014) Electrodeposited polyethylenedioxythiophene with infiltrated gel electrolyte Interface: a close contest of an all-solid-state supercapacitor with its liquid-state counterpart. Nanoscale 6:5944–5492Google Scholar
  41. Zhou H, Zhai HJ, Han G (2016) Superior performance of highly flexible solid-state supercapacitor based on the ternary composites of graphene oxide supported poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-carbon nanotubes. J Power Sources 323(15):125Google Scholar
  42. Wang Z, Tammela P, Huo J, Zhang P, Strømme M, Nyholm L et al (2018) Solution-processed poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nano composite paper electrodes for high-capacitance flexible supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 4:1714–1722Google Scholar
  43. Edberg J, Inganäs O, Engquist I, Berggren M (2018) Boosting the capacity of all-organic paper supercapacitors using wood derivatives. J Mater Chem A 6:145–152Google Scholar
  44. Liu Y, Weng B, Razal JM, Xu Q, Zhao C, Hou Y, Seyedin S, Jalili R, Wallace GG, Chen J et al (2015) High-performance flexible all-solid-state supercapacitor from large free-standing graphene- PEDOT/PSS films. Sci Rep 5:17045Google Scholar
  45. Ye S, Feng J (2014) Self-assembled three-dimensional hierarchical graphene/polypyrrole nanotube hybrid aerogel and its application for supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(12):9671–9679Google Scholar
  46. Li ZS, Lin RS, Liu ZS et al (2016) Novel graphitic carbon nitride/graphite carbon/palladium nanocomposite as a high-performance electrocatalyst for the ethanol oxidation reaction. Electrochim Acta 191:606–615Google Scholar
  47. Chen JJ, Mao ZY, Zhang LX et al (2017) Nitrogen deficient graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced performance for lithium ion battery anodes. ACS Nano 11(12):12650–12657Google Scholar
  48. Li ZC, Wang ZB, Sui XL et al (2015) Ultrathin graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets and graphene composite material as high-performance PtRu catalyst support for methanol electro-oxidation. Carbon 93:105–115Google Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019