Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Comparison of the sensing performance of non-enzymatic amorphous Co-Ni hydroxide glucose sensor with other reported nickel-based and cobalt-based non-enzymatic glucose sensors

From: A Simple Electrochemical Route to Access Amorphous Co-Ni Hydroxide for Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensing

Electrode Sensitivity (μA mM−1 cm−2) Linear range (mM) Correlation coefficient Detection limit (μM) Stability Refs.
Amorphous Ni(OH)2 nanoboxes/GCEa 487.3 0.0005~5 0.998 0.07 30 days, 95% 30
CNFS/Co(OH)2 6800 0.01~0.12 0.999 5 30 days, 98.5% 38
Co3O4 nanoclusters 1377 0.088~7 0.99 26 30 days, 96.1% [43]
CoOOH nanosheet arrays/Ti foil 562.8 0.003~1.109 0.995 1.37 22
Ni(OH)2 flakes/Ni foam 2617 0.0025~1.050 0.9989 2.5 30 days, 93.8% 18
NiO nanosheets/GCE 1138 0.001~0.4 0.999 0.18 10 days, 94% 17
NiOOH nanosheets 2697 0.0005–0.117   0.2 0.9975  
Ni-Co hydroxide 122.45 0.025~3.7 0.989 27
Ni-Co oxide nanowrinkles/rGOb 548.9 0.005-8.56 0.999 2 30 days, 91.5% 41
Amorphous Co-Ni hydroxide 1911.5 0.00025~5.0 0.9994 0.12 60 days, 102% This work
  1. aGlassy carbon electrode
  2. bReduced graphene oxide