Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Comparison of the sensing performance of non-enzymatic amorphous Co-Ni hydroxide glucose sensor with other reported nickel-based and cobalt-based non-enzymatic glucose sensors

From: A Simple Electrochemical Route to Access Amorphous Co-Ni Hydroxide for Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensing

Electrode

Sensitivity

(μA mM−1 cm−2)

Linear range

(mM)

Correlation coefficient

Detection limit (μM)

Stability

Refs.

Amorphous Ni(OH)2 nanoboxes/GCEa

487.3

0.0005~5

0.998

0.07

30 days, 95%

30

CNFS/Co(OH)2

6800

0.01~0.12

0.999

5

30 days, 98.5%

38

Co3O4 nanoclusters

1377

0.088~7

0.99

26

30 days, 96.1%

[43]

CoOOH nanosheet arrays/Ti foil

562.8

0.003~1.109

0.995

1.37

22

Ni(OH)2 flakes/Ni foam

2617

0.0025~1.050

0.9989

2.5

30 days, 93.8%

18

NiO nanosheets/GCE

1138

0.001~0.4

0.999

0.18

10 days, 94%

17

NiOOH nanosheets

2697

0.0005–0.117

 

0.2

0.9975

 

Ni-Co hydroxide

122.45

0.025~3.7

0.989

27

Ni-Co oxide nanowrinkles/rGOb

548.9

0.005-8.56

0.999

2

30 days, 91.5%

41

Amorphous Co-Ni hydroxide

1911.5

0.00025~5.0

0.9994

0.12

60 days, 102%

This work

  1. aGlassy carbon electrode
  2. bReduced graphene oxide

Navigation