Table 3 Comparison of the maximum adsorption capacities of Fe3O4@PDA with some adsorbents cited in the literature
Adsorbents | qm (mg/g) | pH | C0 (Cd) (mg/L) | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-hydroxyapatite nanorods | 92 | 5.8 | 100–500 | [1] | |
Nano-hydroxyapatite chitosan composites | 122 | ||||
Fe3O4@SiO2@m-SiO2–NH2 | 884.906 | 6 | 20–843 | [20] | |
Fly ash/chitosan (A-FA/Ch) composite | 87.72 | 8 | 25–600 | [21] | |
Surface-modified Eucalyptus seeds by sulfuric acid (SMES-S) | 71.15 | 5 | 20–100 | [52] | |
Surface-modified Eucalyptus seeds by hydrochloric acid (SMES-H) | 64.16 | ||||
Nano zero-valent iron particles | 769.2 | – | 25–450 | [57] | |
Biopolymeric sorbent: sporopollenin | 2.23 | 7 | 0–250 | [59] | |
Poly (sodium acrylate)–graphene oxide | 225.7 | 6 | 20–600 | [60] | |
Zero-valent iron-coated biochars (magnetic ones) | MBC1 | 38.00 | 5 | 50–600 | [61] |
MBC2 | 41.25 | ||||
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) | Raw-MWCNT | 1.260 ± 0.02 | 8 | 0.1–5 | [62] |
O-MWCNT | 22.39 ± 0.36 | ||||
E-MWCNT | 21.67 ± 0.40 | ||||
Sawdust of Pinus sylvestris | 15.27 | 4 | 1–50 | [63] | |
19.08 | 5 | ||||
6.72 | 7 | ||||
Mustard husk | 42.85 | 6 | 1–5 | [64] | |
Mercaptoacetic-acid-modified orange peel (MOP) | 136.05 | 7 | 50–1000 | [65] | |
Polydopamine-modified Fe3O4 | 21.58 | 7 | 3–30 | This study |