Skip to main content

UV-Visible Photodetector Based on I-type Heterostructure of ZnO-QDs/Monolayer MoS2


Monolayer MoS2 has shown excellent photoresponse properties, but its promising applications in high-sensitivity photodetection suffer from the atomic-thickness-limited adsorption and band gap-limited spectral selectivity. Here we have carried out investigations on MoS2 monolayer-based photodetectors with and without decoration of ZnO quantum dots (ZnO-QDs) for comparison. Compared with monolayer MoS2 photodetectors, the monolayer ZnO-QDs/MoS2 hybrid device exhibits faster response speed (1.5 s and 1.1 s, respectively), extended broadband photoresponse range (deep UV-visible), and enhanced photoresponse in visible spectrum, such as higher responsivity over 0.084 A/W and larger detectivity of 1.05 × 1011 Jones, which results from considerable injection of carries from ZnO-QDs to MoS2 due to the formation of I-type heterostructure existing in the contact interface of them.


  1. 1.

    Monolayer MoS2 has shown excellent photoresponse properties.

  2. 2.

    ZnO-QDs/MoS2 hybrid device exhibits faster response speed, extended broadband photoresponse range and enhanced photoresponse in visible spectrum.

  3. 3.

    I-type heterostructure existing in the contact interface of ZnO-QDs/MoS2.


Broadband photodetectors are important components of optoelectronic systems, optical communication, environmental monitoring, and so on [1,2,3,4,5]. Especially, UV-visible photodetectors, one of the important broadband photodetectors, have been used in biomedical imaging systems, ultraviolet astronomy, wide spectral switches, memory storage, etc. [6,7,8]. Therefore, it is very necessary to fabricate various materials with highly effective photoresponse in this broadband region [9, 10]. As one of the most studied transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD), 2D molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has presented outstanding potential for constructing various of electronic and optoelectronic devices due to reduced dimensionality [11,12,13], high carrier mobility, strong electron-hole confinement, and high-light sensitivity [14,15,16]. However, owing to narrower band gap of 1.8 eV for the monolayer, MoS2 usually exhibits excellent light absorption to green light region rather than UV-visible range. In order to achieve this broadband photoresponse range, one of the most effective solutions is the construction of heterojunction with other semiconductors owning larger band gap, which can not only extend the response range to UV region from visible range but also inject photoexcited carriers so as to greatly improve the photo gain.

Type II heterojunction is the most widely studied type of two-dimensional material-based photodetectors, in which built-in electric fields can separate carriers efficiently and thus enhance photocurrent, but the recombination time of carriers is also prolonged, leading to slow response time. By comparison, the energy band structure of type I heterojunction allows charges inject from one larger band gap material to another narrower band gap material which leads to the accumulation of charges in the narrower band gap material. Moreover, charges confined inside the material can increase the carrier recombination efficiency so that devices based on it will have a faster response time. Due to the above merits, considerable attention has been paid to type I heterojunction, especially heterojunction formed between the QDs and the layered materials. These 2D-0D hybrid architectures have recently been brought into focus for their high performance as photodetectors because of this structure boosting enhancement of light absorption, facilitating band gap tunability, decreasing the response and decay time, and promoting the concentration of photoexcited charges induced by I-type heterojunction formed between the QDs and the layered materials [17,18,19].

Among several wide band gap semiconductors, zinc oxide (ZnO) has been a well-established material for UV photodetection due to its wide band gap (3.37 eV), high exciton binding energy (60 meV), and fast switching time on illumination with UV light [1, 20]. Recently, ZnO-QDs have widely applied in optoelectronics owing to unique optical properties, large surface-to-volume ratio, and tunable optical band gap [21, 22]. Furthermore, quantum tunneling combining with charge trapping states occurs on the surface of the ZnO-QDs in virtue of the charge carriers being confined in all the three directions. Hence, it is very crucial to present I-type hybrid heterostructure based on 2D MoS2 and ZnO-QDs so as to realize the excellent UV-visible broadband photoresponse with high photo absorbance, responsivity, detectivity, EQE, current on/off ratio, and so on.

Herein, we report a photodetector based on monolayer ZnO-QDs/MoS2 hybrid structure fabricated in a simple process. Due to the I-type heterojunction formed between monolayer MoS2 and ZnO-QDs, the device exhibits fast response speed, extended broadband photoresponse range (deep UV-visible), enhanced photo absorbance, photoresponse, and detectivity. It is also notable that the responsivity reaches as high as 0.084 A/W under 405-nm light at power density (PD) of 0.073 mW/cm2, which is comparable with that of hybrid photodetection at the same wavelength [23, 24]. Thus, our study may provide a method to improve the performance of photodetectors and expand the building blocks for high-performance optoelectronic devices.

Method Section

Growth of Triangular Monolayer MoS2

Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3, 99.99%) and sulfur (S, 99.5%) were used to synthesize high crystalline triangular MoS2 flakes on sapphires through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) procedure [7]. As substrates, sapphires were well cleaned in acetone, alcohol, and deionized water with sonication for 10 min, respectively. And then, they were tightly aligned and placed above an alumina boat which contained 3 mg MoO3 powders, and the boat was placed into the quartz tube and located in the high-temperature region of the furnace. Subsequently, another boat containing 120 mg sulfur (S) powders was placed into the quartz tube too and located in the lower temperature region of the furnace. Before growth, the tube was evacuated by vacuum bump and purged with pure argon (Ar) gas (99.999%) for several times in order to remove oxygen and water in the tube. Next, the temperature of the MoO3 powder rose to 400 °C and kept this temperature for 10 min, and then, rising to 780 °C. When it reached 650 °C, the temperature of the S powders rose to 150 °C within 5 min. Then, high- and low-temperature region remained ultimate temperatures for 5 and 15 min, respectively, and the tube was flushed with argon gas with a flow rate of 10 sccm. After the furnace was cooled down to room temperature, we got the samples grown on the substrates.

Synthesis of ZnO Quantum Dots

ZnO quantum dots were synthesized by the sol-gel method under room temperature. A total of 0.878 g of Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(Ac)2·2H2O) was added in 80 ml triethylene glycol (TEG) in a conical bottle and stirred vigorously; 0.252 g of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH·H2O) was then gradually added into solution. After being stirred for more than 5 h, the solution became clear and green fluorescence could be observed under illumination of UV excitation. If the solution was stirred for 24 h, it exhibited much stronger fluorescence. Next, the bottle was sealed and sonicated in ice water for 30 min. And then, ethyl acetate was added into bottle until precipitates appeared. Ultimately, ZnO quantum dots powdered samples were collected by centrifugation of precipitates, washed by acetone for three times to remove unreacted precursors, heated at 70 °C for 6 h, and dispersed in ethanol for 1 h.

ZnO-QDs/Monolayer MoS2 Device Fabrication

Conventional photolithography was used to directly fabricate Au/Ti electrodes on the monolayer MoS2 grown on the sapphire substrates to construct the devices. Positive photoresist was spin coated on sapphire at 4000 rpm for 1 min and baked at 90 °C for 1 min. And then, electrode patterns were made on monolayer MoS2 by photolithography system. Next, Ti film (5 nm) and Au film (50 nm) were deposited on the substrate one after another by thermal evaporation and followed by lifting off in acetone to remove Ti and Au film which adhered to photoresist so that electrodes formed. After that, devices were annealed at 200 °C for 2 h with a flow of Ar (100 sccm) to remove residues so as to form better contact between MoS2 and electrodes. Ultimately, the ZnO-QDs were dispersed in ethanol solution (2 mg/ml) and single droplet was dropped and spin coated over the MoS2 device at 1000 rpm for 60 s before baked at 70 °C for 10 min; this process being repeated 3 times to ensure that MoS2 surface was covered by enough ZnO-QDs.


Optical images were taken by Motic BA310Met to verify morphology of the as-grown MoS2. Atomic force microscope (AFM) height data was recorded by Bruker Dimension FastScan. Raman mapping, spectra of Raman, and photoluminescence (PL) were recorded on a Raman system (InVia-Reflex) with a 532-nm excitation laser under ambient conditions. X-ray diffraction (XRD) for crystal structure of ZnO powder samples was measured at speed of 8° min−1 by using D8 Advance in situ X-ray powder diffractometer. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) were examined by FEI Tecnai G2 F30 instrument (200 kV). The sample solutions (2 mg/ml) were dropped on carbon-coated copper grids and put into a vacuum drying oven to dry at 70 °C overnight. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance and absorption spectra were obtained by spectrophotometer (Lambda950, PerkinElmer).

Photoelectric Performance Characterization

Our device was tested in a sealed box to prevent electromagnetic disturbance. DUV to visible lights were generated by lasers (VIASHO). Light spot with diameter of 0.7 cm was perpendicularly irradiated on device to ensure device was fully irradiated. Light power intensity was measured by a power energy meter (Thorlabs PM100D) with a silicon power head (Thorlabs S120VC). All photoelectric measurements were carried out by a source meter (Keithley 2636B).

Results and Discussion

Morphology and Structure of the ZnO-QDs/Monolayer MoS2 Photodetector

Spin coating of ZnO-QDs solution was adopted to fabricate ZnO-QDs/MoS2 device, as shown in Fig. 1a. Figure 1b shows the optical image of monolayer MoS2 flakes with average side length of 25 μm. AFM image in Fig. 1c shows the thickness of MoS2 flakes is ~ 0.8 nm, indicating these triangle shape MoS2 flakes are monolayer [25]. Additionally, two Raman active modes located at 384.24 cm−1 and 403.18 cm−1 shown in Raman spectra in Fig. 1d correspond to in-plane E12g and out-of-plane A1g, respectively. The difference of two peaks is 18.94 cm−1 next, in PL spectrum shown in Fig. 1e, there is a peak located at 1.84 eV. Both results are distinguishing features of monolayer MoS2 [26]. Corresponding Raman mapping shown in Fig. 1f indicating that the MoS2 flake has uniform thickness.

Fig. 1

a Schematic diagram of pristine device and ZnO-QDs/MoS2 device. b Optical images of MoS2 flakes, scale bar, 10 μm. c AFM image, the inset shows the thickness of MoS2, scale bar, 2 μm. d Raman spectrum and e PL spectrum of the MoS2 flake. f Raman mapping of the MoS2 flake, scale bar, 5 μm

ZnO-QDs can emit light due to spontaneous emission effect, which was observed in our experiment, as shown in Fig. 2b. Figure 2b demonstrates the XRD patterns of powdered ZnO-QDs that in accordance with JCPDS card no. 36-1451 and no other peaks are observed, which not only verifies the existence of ZnO but also means precursors, have been completely removed by acetone. XRD patterns of QDs materials tend to have wider full width at half maximum (FWHM) compared with bulk or powder materials [27], which is also observed in our as-fabricated ZnO powders. In order to ensure the average size and distribution of ZnO-QDs dispersed in ethanol, TEM and HRTEM are used; corresponding images of ZnO-QDs are shown in Fig. 2c and d. The average size of ZnO-QDs is 4.3 ± 1.87 nm; this result is obtained by statistical TEM analysis of over 100 ZnO-QDs. From HRTEM image in Fig. 2d, we find that ZnO-QDs have highly crystal quality with a lattice spacing of 0.28 nm, which corresponds to (100) plane of crystalline ZnO.

Fig. 2

a ZnO-QDs with different synthesis time emitted light under illumination of UV light. b XRD diffraction patterns of powdered ZnO-QDs. c, d TEM and HRTEM images of ZnO-QDs. Inset shows size distribution of ZnO-QDs

Optoelectronic Performance of the ZnO-QDs/Monolayer MoS2 Photodetectors

Current vs bias voltage (I–V) characteristics of ZnO-QDs/MoS2 devices in dark and under light illumination (532 nm) are shown in Fig. 3a, and the inset is higher magnification I–V characteristics located at negative voltage. The highest on/off ratio was measured to be about 100 at voltage of 0.5 V. The effective area of the device is 185.71 μm2 and the laser PD varies from 1.97 to 24.08 mW/cm2. Due to Schottky contacts between the monolayer MoS2 and electrodes, the I–V curves is asymmetrical. The advantages of Schottky barrier located at the contact areas are that the Schottky barrier can not only separate photogenerated electron-hole pairs in a shorter time but also reduce the electron-hole recombination rate so as to be beneficial to achieving high photocurrent and fast response speed [28,29,30]. As PD increased, photocurrent increased significantly when the device was applied with positive voltage, thus all further measurements were performed at Vds = 1 V.

Fig. 3

a I–V characteristics of the ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector under different illumination power densities. Inset is the higher magnification I–V characteristics (negative voltage) under dark and different illumination power densities. b 3D responsivity map of the ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector. c Power intensity-dependent photocurrent (red) and responsivity (R, green) under an excitation wavelength of 532 nm at Vds = 1 V. d Power intensity-dependent external quantum efficiency (EQE, red) and specific detectivity (D*, green) at Vds = 1 V

Responsivity is one of the crucial parameters of photodetectors, which is defined by Rλ = Iph/PS, where P is the light PD, and S is the effective area of the photosensitive. We present a 3D responsivity map of ZnO-QDs/MoS2 device in Fig. 3b, which reflects the impact of different Vds and PD on responsivity. To find out the performance differences between pristine device and ZnO-QDs decorated device, we measured and compared photocurrent (Iph = IlightIdark) plotted by red points and responsivity (Rλ) plotted by green points, under illumination of 405-nm laser with Vds = 1 V, as shown in Fig. 3c. The photocurrent is fitted by Iph Pα, where P is the light PD and α represents the index of the power law. Fitting the measured photocurrents, the value of α = 0.8 for the pristine MoS2 and α = 0.84 for ZnO-QDs/MoS2 are achieved. Here, the calculated α close to 1 implies there are less photoexcited carrier lost due to recombination [31]. The pristine device has maximum photocurrent of 0.168 nA under laser PD of 24.08 mW/cm2 and exhibits responsivity of 0.028 A/W under lower laser PD of 0.073 mW/cm2. With the same PD, ZnO-QDs/MoS2 device shows a higher photocurrent of 0.667 nA and a responsivity of 0.084 A/W. This result reveals photocurrent of monolayer MoS2 devices can be significantly improved by decoration of ZnO-QDs. Besides, two important parameters in photodetection, external quantum efficiency (EQE) and detectivity (D*), were also calculated for further comparison. EQE is ratio of photogenerated electrons which are collected outside of the device to the number of incident photons, expressed as EQE = hcRλ/λe, where h is Planck’s constant, c is the speed of light, λ is the wavelength of excitation light, and e is the elementary electronic charge. As for D*, it can quantify the sensitivity of the photodetector and is defined as D* = RλS1/2 /(2eIdark )1/2 if we assume the Idark contributes to major noise. As shown in Fig. 3d, pristine device exhibits a maximum EQE (red) and D* (green), corresponding to 8.5% and 3.84 × 1010 Jones, respectively, under laser PD of 0.075 mW/cm2. Meanwhile, with the same PD, maximum EQE and D*, corresponding to 25.7% and 1.05 × 1011 Jones, respectively, both of them being about 3 times higher than those of the pristine one are obtained by ZnO-QDs/MoS2 device. The D* achieved by our hybrid device is competitive with that of many other reported photodetectors based on layered materials, such as graphene quantum dot/WSe2/Si heterojunction (4.51 × 109 Jones) and graphene/graphene QDs/graphene structure (~ 1011 Jones) [32, 33]. This is because Idark obtained in device is reduced to extremely small value below 0.1 nA at 1 V bias; it is comparable with Idark of graphene-silicon heterojunction photodetector (0.1 nA at zero bias) [34].

Photocurrent of pristine device and ZnO-QDs decorated device under exposure of laser with different wavelength are given in Fig. 4a. There exists clear enhancement of photocurrent whatever in 405 nm, 532 nm, or 635 nm, which implies ZnO quantum dots with a wide band gap are able to improve the performance of visible light detection. We further investigated the broadband spectral response of the hybrid device, 254-nm light with PD of 0.26 mW/cm2 and 375-nm light with PD of 0.51 mW/cm2 were applied to illuminate hybrid device and excellent photoresponse properties were observed as shown in Fig. 4b. Besides, the hybrid device shows no response when it was illuminated by the light with wavelength over 800 nm. Although the power of UV light illumination is low, the photocurrent is still much higher or at least comparable with those obtained under visible light illumination with much higher PD. We believe it is the wide band gap of ZnO-QDs that allows hybrid device to absorb more photons when UV light falls on it; thus, lots of carries are generated and transferred to MoS2 so as to greatly enlarge photocurrent. Moreover, after switching on/off status for 6 times over 250 s, photocurrent and dark current still stayed on their level, which demonstrated excellent photo stability of this hybrid device.

Fig. 4

a Photocurrent of pristine device and ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector illuminated under different PD with different wavelength at Vds = 1 V. b Multiple cycles of photoresponse of the ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector under DUV (254 nm) and UV (375 nm) light illumination (Vds = 1 V). The response time of c pristine device and d ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector illuminated under PD of 35 mW/cm2 with wavelength of 635 nm at Vds = 1 V. e Normalized PDCR of ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector under a 532-nm laser illumination at Vds = 1 V; photocurrent measured at day 1 and day 31 was inserted for better comparison

A photodetector with fast response speed is suitable of some areas, such as optical communication and video imaging. As another important parameter of photodetectors, response time was also investigated under incident 635-nm light with PD of 35 mW/cm2. In this work, we defined the rise time and the decay time of the photodetector as the time taken for the device to reach 90% of the equilibrium value from the initial current, and vice versa, respectively. For the pristine device, rise time was 9.5 s and decay time was 17.4 s, such slow response speed mainly due to trap states located in band gap which was introduced by defects in the materials [35]. After MoS2 photodetector was decorated with ZnO-QDs, as shown in Fig. 4c and d, the rise and decay time reduced to 1.5 s and 1.1 s, the response time was reduced by 84.2% and 93.7%, respectively. This result demonstrates that ZnO-QDs can greatly shorten response time of MoS2 photodetectors and make this hybrid photodetector a suitable candidate for practical applications. To evaluate long-term stability of the hybrid photodetector, we measured the photocurrent of the device over 1 month (interval of 3 days), as shown in Fig. 4e; photocurrent/dark current ratio (PDCR = Iph/Idark) was applied. After being exposed to air for 1 month, PDCR of the device shows no obvious degeneration; inserted images show that the current measured at day 1 and day 31 almost remains on the same level; clearly, this hybrid photodetector has good stability for long-term photodetection.

Photoresponse Mechanism

Here we investigated the mechanism on the photodetection performance enhancement of the ZnO-QDs/MoS2 photodetector. Firstly, we checked the absorption of the hybrid structure by means of numerical simulations. Using the finite element method, we built a calculation model that consists of an air domain on top and a sapphire substrate at beneath. The top and bottom of the model were truncated by two perfectly matched layers to avoid spurious reflections. The refractive index of the sapphire substrate was set as a constant 1.75. In the beginning, we respectively put 0.8-nm-thick MoS2 layer and 4.5-nm-thick ZnO layer on the sapphire substrate, to check the independent absorptions. The refractive index of MoS2 monolayer was taken from reference [36], and the one for ZnO was taken from reference [37]. We then put a hybrid layer (ZnO over MoS2) on the same sapphire substrate to examine the overall absorption. As shown in Fig. 5a, the hybrid layer presents an enhanced absorption at the wavelength region below than 400 nm compared with the bare MoS2 monolayer, revealing a better UV absorption after the ZnO-QDs decoration. Then, we experimentally checked UV-Vis absorption spectra of MoS2, ZnO-QDs, and ZnO-QDs/MoS2 and the result is matched to the calculated one. As shown in Fig. 5b, monolayer MoS2 exhibits a broadband absorption range from UV to visible wavelength light and no absorption peaks are found when the wavelength increases to NIR. As for ZnO-QDs, the absorption peaks are located at UV wavelength light and there exists a larger absorption rate in comparison with MoS2. After decoration of ZnO-QDs, we found that ZnO-QDs/MoS2 exhibits stronger absorption ability than pristine MoS2, indicating that the heterostructure has more intensive light-matter interaction. The corresponding Tauc plots are shown in Fig. 5c, and the band gap of MoS2 and ZnO-QDs can be calculated to be ~ 1.77 eV and ~ 3.42 eV, respectively, which are close to the values in the previous reports [27, 38].

Fig. 5

a Calculated absorption spectra of MoS2, ZnO-QDs, and ZnO-QDs/MoS2. b UV-vis absorption spectra of MoS2, ZnO-QDs, and ZnO-QDs/MoS2. c Tauc plots of MoS2 and ZnO-QDs

Based on the previous reports, MoS2 and ZnO-QDs are both n-type semiconductors with the work function of 4.7 eV and 5.3 eV [39, 40], respectively. Electron affinity of MoS2 is approximately 4.3 eV [41], which is slightly larger than that of ZnO-QDs (4.2 eV) [42]. Band gap of MoS2 and ZnO-QDs is considered to be 1.8 eV and 3.4 eV according to Tauc plot calculations. The energy band structure of MoS2 and ZnO (before and after contact), shown in Fig. 6a and b, is constructed and used to investigate the mechanism about the photodetection performance enhancement.

Fig. 6

a and b are band diagrams of MoS2 and ZnO-QDs before and after contact

MoS2/ZnO-QDs heterojunction is formed by Van der Waals forces and the I-type band alignment at the interface can be used to explain the enhanced responsivity [42]. When these heterostructures are illuminated under UV light, both ZnO-QDs and MoS2 strongly absorb light photon and electrons move from valence to conduction band so that the process “I” occurs. Afterwards, electrons are injected from ZnO-QDs conduction band into MoS2 conduction band so as to form process “V” through thermal agitation, meanwhile, part of electrons in ZnO-QDs conduction band tunnel to conduction band in MoS2, resulting in the process “III.” And then, holes in ZnO-QDs valence band move to the corresponding valence band in MoS2, as shown in the process “IV.” Also, spontaneous emission can make some of the electrons in the conduction band of ZnO-QDs and move back to the valence band to emit photon that can excite electrons in the valence band of MoS2 to the conduction band so as to form the process “II.” On the other hand, similar processes happened when the hybrid devices were illuminated by visible light, except the excited electrons were from defect energy level of ZnO-QDs [43], which would lower excited energy. As a result, these excited electron-hole pairs transfer from ZnO-QDs to MoS2 and lead to significant enhancement of photocurrent in comparison with the pristine device. In addition, large number of excited carries MoS2 will greatly increase the recombination rate and decrease the response and decay time [42], which were observed in Fig. 4c and d.


In summary, we report a photodetector based on monolayer MoS2/ZnO-QDs hybrid structure. Compared with the monolayer MoS2, ZnO-QDs decoration leads to not only huge enhancement of photoresponse in visible spectrum but also extension to deep ultraviolet (DUV) range. Under excitation of visible light, this hybrid device exhibits faster response speed (1.5 s and 1.1 s, respectively), higher responsivity over 0.084 A/W, and larger detectivity of 1.05 × 1011 Jones. These are attributed to large number of injection of carries from ZnO-QDs to MoS2. In addition, the hybrid device shows excellent stability under exposure to atmosphere at room temperature. Thus, our study may provide a method to improve the performance of photodetectors and expand the building blocks for high-performance optoelectronic devices.

Availability of data and materials

In the manuscript, all data supporting their findings are from the fabrication experimental, characterization, and measurement. All authors wish to share their data. The data can be shared.





Atomic force microscopy


X-ray photoelectron spectra


Chemical vapor deposition

R λ :


I ds :

Source-drain current

I ph :



External quantum efficiency




Valence band


Conduction band


  1. 1.

    Thanga Gomathi P, Sahatiya P, Badhulika S (2017) Large-area, flexible broadband photodetector based on ZnS–MoS2 hybrid on paper substrate. Adv Funct Mater 27:1701611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mu H, Wang Z, Yuan J et al (2015) Graphene-Bi2Te3 heterostructure as saturable absorber for short pulse generation[J]. ACS Photonics 2(7):150608131013000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jiang X, Liu S, Liang W et al (2018) Broadband nonlinear photonics in few-layer MXene Ti3C2Tx (T = F, O, or OH)[J]. Laser Photonics Rev 12(2):1700229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yao JD, Zheng ZQ, Yang GW (2019) Production of large-area 2D materials for high-performance photodetectors by pulsed-laser deposition[J]. Prog Mater Sci 100573

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yao J, Zheng Z, Yang G (2017) All-layered 2D optoelectronics: a high-performance UV–vis–NIR broadband SnSe photodetector with Bi2Te3 topological insulator electrodes[J]. Adv Funct Mater 27(33):1701823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hu K, Chen H, Jiang M, Teng F, Zheng L, Fang X (2016) Broadband photoresponse enhancement of a high performance t -Se microtube photodetector by plasmonic metallic nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater. 26:6641–6648

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Um D-S, Lee Y, Lim S, Park J, Yen W-C, Chueh Y-L, Kim H-j, Ko H (2016) InGaAs nanomembrane/Si van der Waals heterojunction photodiodes with broadband and high photoresponsivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8:26105–26111

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sichao D, Lu W, Ali A, Zhao P, Shehzad K, Guo H, Ma L, Liu X, Pi X, Wang P, Fang H, Xu Z, Gao C, Dan Y, Tan P, Wang H, Lin C-T, Yang J, Dong S, Cheng Z, Li E, Yin W, Luo J, Yu B, Hasan T, Xu Y, Hu W, Duan X (2017) A broadband fluorographene photodetector. Adv Mater 29:1700463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yao J, Zheng Z, Yang G (2018) Ultrasensitive 2D/3D heterojunction multicolor photodetectors: a synergy of laterally and vertically aligned 2D layered materials[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(44):38166–38172

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yao J, Yang G (2018) Flexible and high-performance all-2D photodetector for wearable devices[J]. Small 14(21):1704524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xu H, Han X, Dai X et al (2018) High detectivity and transparent few-layer MoS2/glassy-graphene heterostructure photodetectors[J]. Adv Mater 30(13):1706561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang X, Grajal J, Vazquez-Roy JL et al (2019) Two-dimensional MoS2-enabled flexible rectenna for Wi-Fi-band wireless energy harvesting[J]. Nature 566(7744):368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhu J, Xu H, Zou G et al (2019) MoS2–OH bilayer-mediated growth of inch-sized monolayer MoS2 on arbitrary substrates[J]. J Am Chem Soc 141(13):5392–5401

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang Y, Huang X, Wu D, Zhuo R, Wu E, Cheng J, Shi Z, Xu T, Tiana Y, Li X (2018) A room-temperature near-infrared photodetector based on a MoS2/CdTe p–n heterojunction with a broadband response up to 1700 nm. J Mater Chem C 6:4861–4865

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lu L, Liang Z, Wu L et al (2017) Few-layer bismuthene: sonochemical exfoliation, nonlinear optics and applications for ultrafast photonics with enhanced stability[J]. Laser Photonics Rev 1700221:5

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yupeng Z, Chang-Keun L, Zhigao D, GuannanYu, Haus JW, Han Z, Paras N Prasad (2019)  Photonics and optoelectronics using nano-structured hybrid perovskite media and their optical cavities, Phys. Rep 795(10):1–51

  17. 17.

    Huang Y, Zhan X, Xu K, Yin L, Cheng Z, Jiang C, Wang Z, He J (2016) Highly sensitive photodetectors based on hybrid 2D-0D SnS2-copper indium sulfide quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 108:013101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lu L, Tang X, Cao R et al (2017) Broadband nonlinear optical response in few-layer antimonene and antimonene quantum dots: a promising optical Kerr media with enhanced stability[J]. Adv Opt Mater 5(17):1700301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zheng Z, Yao J, Zhu L et al (2018) Tin dioxide quantum dots coupled with graphene for high-performance bulk-silicon Schottky photodetector[J]. Mater Horizons 5(4):727–737

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Boruah BD, Misra A (2015) ZnO quantum dots and graphene based heterostructure for excellent photoelastic and highly sensitive ultraviolet photodetector. RSC Adv 5:90838–90846

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Son DI, Yang HY, Kim TW, Park WI (2013) Photoresponse mechanisms of ultraviolet photodetectors based on colloidal ZnO quantum dot-graphene nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett. 102:021105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lin KF, Cheng HM, Hsu HC, Lin LJ, Hsieh WF (2005) Band gap variation of size-controlled ZnO quantum dots synthesized by sol–gel method. Chem Phys Lett. 409:208

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mahyavanshi RD, Kalita G, Ranade A, et al (2018) Photovoltaic action with broadband photoresponsivity in germanium-MoS2 ultrathin heterojunction. IEEE Transections on Electron Devices. 65(10):4434–4440

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhuo R, Wang Y, Wu D, et al (2017) High-performance self-powered deep ultraviolet photodetector based on MoS2/GaN p–n heterojunction. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 6(2):299–303

  25. 25.

    Wang J, Cai X, Shi R, et al (2017) Twin defect derived growth of atomically thin MoS2 dendrites. ACS Nano. 12(1):635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee C, Yan H, Brus LE et al (2010) Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano 4(5):2695–2700

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mishra R, Yadav RS, Pandey AC et al (2010) Formation of ZnO@Cd(OH)2, core-shell nanoparticles by sol–gel method: an approach to modify surface chemistry for stable and enhanced green emission. J Luminescence 130(3):365–373

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhou X, Gan L, Tian W, Zhang Q, Jin S, Li H, Bando Y, Golberg D, Zhai T (2015) Ultrathin SnSe2 flakes grown by chemical vapor deposition for high-performance photodetectors. Adv Mater. 27:8035–8041

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hu X, Zhang X, Liang L, Bao J, Li S, Yang W, Xie Y (2014) High-performance flexible broadband photodetector based on organolead halide perovskite. Adv Funct Mater. 24(46):7373–7380

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zheng Z, Yao J, Xiao J, Yang G (2016) Synergistic effect of hybrid multilayer In2Se3 and nanodiamonds for highly sensitive photodetectors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8(31):20200–20211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang W, Huang JK, Chen CH et al (2013) High-gain phototransistors based on a CVD MoS2 monolayer. Advanced Materials 25(25):3456–3461

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sun M, Fang Q, Xie D et al (2018) Heterostructured graphene quantum dot/WSe2/Si photodetector with suppressed dark current and improved detectivity[J]. Nano Res. 1–11(6):3233–3243

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kim CO, Hwang SW, Kim S, et al (2015) High-performance graphene-quantum-dot photodetectors[J]. Sci Rep. 4:5603

  34. 34.

    Li X, Zhu M, Du M et al (2016) High detectivity graphene-silicon heterojunction photodetector[J]. Small 12(5):549–549

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Qin JK, Ren DD, Shao WZ et al (2017) Photoresponse enhancement in monolayer ReS2 phototransistor decorated with CdSe-CdS-ZnS quantum dots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces

  36. 36.

    Jung G H, Yoo SJ, Park QH. Measuring the optical permittivity of two-dimensional materials without a priori knowledge of electronic transitions. Nanophotonics 8 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stelling C, Singh CR, Karg M et al (2017) Plasmonic nanomeshes: their ambivalent role as transparent electrodes in organic solar cells. Sci Rep 7:42530

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J et al (2010) Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105(13):136805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yin Z, Li H, Li H et al (2012) Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 6(1):74–80

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhao S, Wang G, Liao J et al (2018) Vertically aligned MoS2/ZnO nanowires nanostructures with highly enhanced NO2, sensing activities. Appl Surf Sci

  41. 41.

    Xue F, Chen L, Chen J et al (2016) type MoS2 and n-type ZnO diode and its performance enhancement by the piezophototronic effect. Advanced Materials 28(17):3391–3398

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nazir G, Khan MF, Akhtar I et al (2017) Enhanced photoresponse of ZnO quantum dot-decorated MoS2 thin films. RSC Adv 7(27):16890–16900

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Oba F, Togo A, Tanaka I (2008) Defect energetics in ZnO: a hybrid Hartree-Fock density functional study. Phys. Rev. B. 77(24):245202

Download references


We acknowledged Prof. Zheng Zhaoqiang from Guangdong Technology University who gave us many suggestions to measure the photodetector.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50902097) and Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China (2019A1515010007).

Author information




Yong Heng Zhou is the first author who designed the device and wrote this manuscript. Zhi Bin Zhang is the second author who fabricates and measures this device. Ping Xu and Han Zhang give some suggestions for this manuscript. Bing Wang is the corresponding author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Yong Heng Zhou is a Graduate Student in Shenzhen University, majoring in optic-electronic devices field.

Zhi Bin Zhang is a Graduate Student in Shenzhen University, majoring in optic-electronic devices field.

Ping Xu is a Professor in Shenzhen University, majoring in optic-electronic research.

Han Zhang is a Professor in Shenzhen University, majoring in optic-electronic research.

Bing Wang is an Associate Professor in Shenzhen University, majoring in optic-electronic research such as photodetector and gas sensor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y.H., Zhang, Z.B., Xu, P. et al. UV-Visible Photodetector Based on I-type Heterostructure of ZnO-QDs/Monolayer MoS2. Nanoscale Res Lett 14, 364 (2019).

Download citation


  • Photodetector
  • 2D materials
  • I-type heterostructure