Skip to main content

Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Compact, Smooth FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 Film with Efficiency Exceeding 22%


The utilization of mixed cations is beneficial for taking the advantages of cations and achieving highly efficient perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Herein, the precisely small incorporation of CH(NH2)2 (FA) cations in methyl ammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) enables the formation of compact, smooth perovskite film with high crystallinity. Consequently, the short-circuit current and the fill factor of the PSCs based on FAxMA1-xPbI3 perovskite are greatly improved, leading to the enhanced device efficiency. The champion PSC based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 exhibits a remarkably high efficiency of 22.02%. Furthermore, the PSCs based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite also show improved device stability. This work provides a simple approach to fabricate high-quality perovskite films and high-performance PSCs with better stability.


From the past decade, the increase in industrial and domestic energy needs has not only created an energy crisis but also causing problems derived from global warming. Semiconductor technology played a significant role to overcome these crises with minimal environmental problems. Semiconductor material-based solar cells are environmental friendly such as silicon, compound semiconductor, oxides, and organic materials [1, 2]. Perovskite material-based solar cells (PSCs) have become the focus due to its high power conversion efficiency rocketing from 3.8% in 2009 up to 25.2% to now [3]. The remarkable high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs relies on the unique optoelectronic properties of the perovskite materials, and perovskite material engineering is a key approach to improve the device performance.

Generally, perovskite is a material with the same type of crystal structure based on the formula ABX3, where A is an organic cation (like CH3NH2+) or alkali cation (Cs+) or their mixing cations, B is the metal anion (Pb+2 or Sn+2), and X refers the halide anions (X = I, Br, or Cl) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Among the perovskite materials, FAxMA1-xPbI3 (MA, methyl ammonium; FA, formamidinium) is the highly used material in PSCs. As FA+ has a bit larger size (ionic radius = 2.79 Å) as compared to MA+ (ionic radius = 2.70 Å), FAxMA1-xPbI3 possesses a lower band gap than MAPbI3, which thus allow for higher solar light harvesting efficiency [8, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Mostly, a small amount of MA cation is doped with FA cation to fabricate FAxMA1-xPbI3 perovskite, which promotes the formation of the photoactive FA cation phase than pure FAPbI3 and lead to high device efficiency [19,20,21]. However, even with the incorporation of MA cations, it is yet very challenging to achieve pure black phased FA perovskite without any trace of yellow phased FA perovskite because of the larger ionic radius of FA cations specially when large amount of FA is used. This issue has been frequently observed in spite of the high efficiency of these PSCs, since this affects the structural and thermal stability of the PSCs devices [22, 23]. Therefore, in order to achieve high efficiency and device stability in FAxMA1-xPbI3-based PSCs, the formation of the yellow phase defects needs to be prevented. In this work, instead of using a large amount of FA cations in FAxMA1-xPbI3 perovskite, we use a small amount of FA to fabricate FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 planar film, which enables the champion device efficiency exceeding 22%. Different from the results reported from mesoporous perovskite film [24], we found the introduction of small FA into MAI within the gaps of the PbI6 octahedra stabilizing the MAPbI3 perovskite structure into a “quasi-cubic” phase at room temperature. Furthermore, the improvements here mainly derive from the largely increased JSC, benefiting from the formation of compact, smooth, high-quality perovskite film with the incorporation of FA. Furthermore, the PSCs based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite also show improved device stability.

Results and Discussions

The employed device structure of the PSCs in this work is shown schematically in Fig. 1, where SnO2 layer is used as the electron transport layer (ETL), Spiro-OMeTAD as the hole transport layer (HTL), and gold (Au) as the anode. Both standard and modified perovskite layers were deposited on the indium tin oxide (ITO) transparent electrode as the absorbing layer by conventional one-step solvent-engineering method.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic structure of perovskite solar cell

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to investigate the morphology of the perovskite films. The film prepared with pristine MAPbI3 shows a higher ratio of grain boundaries as shown in Fig. 2a. The pinholes together with lots of grain boundaries in the perovskite film promote the non-radiative recombination and reduce the device efficiency of the PSCs. In contrast, homogenous, pinhole-free perovskite film is achieved due to the incorporation of FA cations into pristine MAPbI3 (FA0.1MA0.9PbI3) film, as shown in Fig. 2b. It presents the closely packed structure with a small enlargement in the grain size and much less grain boundaries. A compact, smooth film morphology with a large grain size will minimize the trap states and defects in the perovskite film.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Top view SEM images of MAPbI3 (a) and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (b). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of standard and modified perovskite on glass substrates. c Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) spectra of both standard and modified perovskite films (d)

The steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of both MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite films are shown in Fig. 2c. As expected, a significant redshift in the emission peak is noticed. In addition, peak narrowing was also observed. This significant shift is due to the introduction of FA into MA in perovskite lattice. Furthermore, PL intensity is also increased by some extent with the addition of FA cations, which indicates the decrease in trap states and in return gives highly crystalline FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film.

In order to understand more about the decrease in trap states of the modified perovskite layer as compared to a standard device, time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) was performed on perovskite film based on each material as shown in Fig. 2d. Since perovskite layer is deposited on the glass substrate without any transport layer, so it is expected that the carrier recombination represents only the interlayer charge transport (i.e., non-radiative recombination), which would show longer carrier lifetime and slower interlayer recombination with the incorporation of FA in MAPbI3 [25, 26]. Two components of time can be obtained to calculate the carrier recombination lifetime of the as-prepared perovskite film of each type by fitting the TRPL curve with bi-exponential function of time (t):

$$ F(t)={A}_1{e}^{-}\frac{t}{\tau_1}+{A}_2{e}^{-}\frac{t}{\tau_2}+{\gamma}_0 $$

where τ1 and τ2 in Eq. 1 represent the time constant of fast decay and slow decay process, respectively [27]. The fast decay τ1 component represents the surface recombination, whereas the slow decay component is related to the recombination taking place in the bulk of the perovskite structure. All the fitted TRPL parameters for standard and modified perovskite samples are summarized in table S1, and the average recombination lifetime (τave) of both perovskite layers was calculated approximately from the fitted curve data according to the formula shown in supplementary information. Such as, in comparison with the standard perovskite film with an average lifetime decay time of 24.61 ns, FAMAPbI3 (10%) film shows noticeably longer carrier average lifetime of 49.92 ns, indicating the suppression of non-radiation recombination in modified PSCs.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was employed to investigate the crystallinity of the perovskite films. Figure 3a shows the main diffraction peak of the perovskite film at 2θ of 14.24° exhibits preferred orientation with higher intensity, where the small incorporation of FA into standard MAPbI3 perovskite film enables the diffraction intensity much stronger, suggesting the higher crystallinity. Furthermore, the diffraction peaks of the modified perovskite layer shift towards small angle. The prominent peaks shift from 14.61° and 28.84° to 14.24° and 28.49°, respectively, as shown in Fig. 3b, c. Since the size of FA cations is larger than the MA cations, the lattice size increases with the incorporation of FA ions, which is in accordance with Bragg’s equation (2d sinθ = ). Moreover, the introduction of the FA cation with the MA also decreases the tolerance factor and provokes the formation of a stable cubic perovskite phase. Note that depending on the film morphology and deposition conditions, adding a small amount of FA (0.1) may also precede to a tetragonal phase. The full width and half maximum (FWHM) was used to estimate the grain size in the perovskite films. In FA0.1MA0.9PbI3, the value of FWHM of the highest peak is 0.133°, as shown in the supplementary information Fig. S1a b, which gives the evidence of increase in grain size with higher crystallinity as compared to MAPbI3 film (FWHM 0.174°).

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD patterns (a) for MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite films and enlarged XRD pattern of the peaks at 13–15° (b) and 27–29° (c)

In order to confirm the element composition after precisely small incorporation of FA cations, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out on both standard and modified perovskite layers. The presence of FA into MA cations can be confirmed by the identified C–C bond (284.8 eV) as shown in Fig. 4a, c. Furthermore, the appeared bond of C–N (401.3 eV) and C=N (400.10 eV) is from incorporated FA cations which can be observed clearly in N1s spectrum of FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite [27] as shown in Fig. 4b. For further analysis of the element composition, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was performed as shown in Fig S2 a & b. We can evidently equate the chemical composition; the integration of elements peaks demonstrates a quantified atomic ratio % of C to N to Pb 44.75(2.3):22.73(1.1):19.34(1) for MAPbI3 and 47.71 (2.3):27.34 (1.3):20.15 (1) for FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite [28].

Fig. 4
figure 4

XPS measurement for elements for MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite films. Carbon (a, c). Nitrogen (b, d)

Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) technique was used to further analyze the perovskite film, which measures the contact potential difference (CPD) between the tip and the surface of the sample beneath [14, 23]. The surface roughness is remarkably decreased from 20.488 to 4.778 nm with the incorporation of FA into MAPbI3 perovskite, as shown by the topographical images in Fig. 5a, d. This further reveals the compact, smooth morphology of the perovskite film with FA doping. The surface morphology of both standard and modified perovskite films in three dimensions (3D) is shown in Fig. 5b and e, respectively. The surface potential images are shown in Fig. 5c, f, and the 3D images are shown in the supplementary information Fig. S3 (b & c). It is clear that FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film shows more homogenous potential distribution than MAPbI3 film, indicating less surface defects at the surface of FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film. Meanwhile, the FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film demonstrates higher surface potential at the grain boundaries than the standard perovskite film, which will lower the trapping and recombination probability of the minority carriers and stipulates current path for minority carriers to reach the corresponding selective contacts. Herein, it will improve the overall performance of the PSCs heading towards better charge transport with suppressed recombination.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Topography images (a, d), 3D topography images (b, e), and surface potential images (c, f) of MAPbI3 film and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film

Cross-sectional SEM images of MAPbI3 film and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film are shown in Fig. 6a, b. These perovskite films are fabricated on the top of SnO2 ETL. It can be seen clearly that the ETL/perovskite interface is greatly improved with the incorporation of FA in perovskite. It can also be seen that FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film is much more compact and smooth than MAPbI3 film. These improvements favor for efficient carrier extraction at interfaces. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were measured to analyze the absorption features of the perovskite films, as shown in Fig. 6c. FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film shows slightly higher absorption intensities than the MAPbI3 film. The band gap values have been calculated using the Tauc plot spectra shown in S4 a & S4b, which are 1.58 eV for MAPbI3 and 1.54 eV for FA0.1MA0.9PbI3, demonstrating that the small incorporation of FAI cations into the MAI lattice matrix reduces the band gap. The reduced band gap is beneficial to develop high-efficiency perovskite solar cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Cross-sectional images of MAPbI3 (a) and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (b) films on the top of ETL/ITO and the absorption spectra (c) of perovskite films

The PSCs based on MAPbI3 (standard PSC) and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (modified PSC) are constructed with the structure of ITO/SnO2/perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. The current density-voltage (J-V) curves are shown in Fig. 7a, and the corresponding photovoltaic parameters are listed in Table 1. It is clear that the short-circuit current density (JSC) of modified PSCs is obviously higher than that of standard PSCs, leading to a significant increase in device efficiency. The maximum PCE of modified PSCs is 22.02% with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.13 V, JSC of 25.87 mAcm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.75. The remarkable improvements in JSC and PCE of modified PSCs based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 strongly imply improved carrier collection. Due to the compact and smooth surface features of FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 films with a large grain size and better crystallinity, charge extraction and transport are enabled with minimal loss induced by recombination processes. Hence, JSC is greatly increased, and, meanwhile, VOC is also improved. The increased JSC is also partially contributed by the reduced band gap and the enhanced absorption in FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 film (as revealed by the absorption features shown in Fig. 6c). To further explore the effect of FA into MAPbI3, we also used different ratios of FA (5–20%), and the resultant device performance of the corresponding PSCs is shown in Fig. S5 and Table S2. The incorporation of FA in the perovskite with a molar ratio from 5 to 20% increases JSC and PCE, achieving the high efficiency of the modified PSCs. The best values of the device performance are obtained in the condition of using FA0.1MA0.9PbI3.

Fig. 7
figure 7

J-V curves (a), dV/dJ vs. (JSC + J)−1 plots with linear fitting curve (b), and ln (JSC + J) vs. (VRSJ) plots with linear fitting curves for the PSCs based on MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 (c). Corresponding EQE spectra for modified perovskite in comparison with standard PSCs (d)

Table 1 Photovoltaic characteristics of standard and modified PSCs

To investigate the underlying mechanisms for the remarkably improved device performance with the small incorporation of FA, the parameters of series resistance (RS) and reverse saturable current density (J0) have been characterized [29, 30]. The J-V characteristics are stated by:

$$ J={J}_{\mathrm{ph}}-{J}_0\left[\exp \left(\frac{e\left(V+ AJ{R}_S\right)}{m{K}_{\beta }T}\right)-1\right]-\frac{V+J{R}_S}{R_{\mathrm{SH}}} $$

where J is the current flowing through the external load, Jph is the photocurrent density generated by a diode, A is the device area, RSH is the shunt resistance, m refers to ideality factor of the pn juntion, Kβ is the Boltzman’s constant, and T and e are the temperature and electronic charge, respectively [31, 32]. For an ideal condition (RSH is large enough) [33, 34], Eq. 1 can be written as:

$$ \frac{dV}{dJ}=\frac{A{K}_{\beta }T}{e}{\left({J}_{\mathrm{ph}}+J\right)}^{-1}+{R}_S $$
$$ \ln \left({J}_{\mathrm{SC}}+J\right)=\frac{e}{A{K}_{\beta }T}\left(V-{R}_S\ J\right)+\ln {\mathrm{J}}_0 $$

RS can be obtained from the –dV/dJ vs (JSCJ)−1 plots in Fig. 7b with a linear fitting curve in accordance with Eq. 2, which are 4.8 Ω cm2 and 2.3 Ω cm2 for standard PSC with MAPbI3 and modified PSC with FA0.1MA0.9PbI3, respectively. This decrease in RS for the modified PSC indicates better carrier transport and contributes to the high JSC. J0 determined from ln (JSC + J) vs. (VRSJ) plots in Fig. 7c is 1.43 × 10−2, and 1.16 × 10−5 mAcm−2 for MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 PSCs, respectively. A smaller J0 indicates lower recombination, and thus, VOC of the modified PSCs is improved. The reduced recombination by FA incorporation is also consitent with the KPFM measurement. Moreover, the crosssponding external quantum efficiency (EQE) has been calculated, where broad photoresponses with high values are obtained; the calculated integrated current densities (JSC) are 24.88 mAcm−2 and 20.25 mAcm−2 for best modified and standard devices, respectively, as shown in Fig. 7d which is consistent with the JSC value calculated from J-V test.

In general, EIS is a suitable tool to analyze the internal electrical process of PSCs. Herein, EIS were performed as a voltage function. The obtained data were fitted with ZView using appropriate equivalent circuit as shown in Fig. 8a. The recombination resistance (Rrec) of each perovskite solar cell is calculated from the diameter of the semicircle. It can be seen clearly that Rrec of modified perovskite solar increased with the small incorporation of FA into MAPbI3 which indicates the significant decrease in undesired recombination and in return lowers the defect density of PSCs.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plot for modified perovskite in comparison with standard PSCs (a). Normalized PCE vs. time plots of standard and modified PSCs (b)

Figure 8b shows that the modified PSC with FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 keeps its original value up to 80% even after 800 h, while the standard PSC with MAPbI3 only retains less than 60% of its original value. The improved stability of the PSC with FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 correlates to the high quality of the FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite film. The device stability issues of the PSCs were also characterized within different time intervals under ambient conditions.

In order to confirm the repeatability of the PSCs, the average performance of both MAPbI3 and FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 PSCs averaged from more than 40 devices are shown in Table 1, and the statistics of the photovoltaic parameters are shown in Fig. 9a–d. It can be seen that in PSCs with FA0.1MA0.9PbI3, the average performance is also obviously superior to the PSCs with MAPbI3 and show better reproducibility.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Statistics of VOC, FF PCE, and JSC from more than 40 devices for each kind of PSCs (ad)

Experimental Details

Materials and Methods

CH3NH3I, PbI2, CH (NH2)2, and Spiro-OMeTAD were purchased from Xi’an Polymer Light Technology Corp. SnO2 was purchased from Alfa Aesar. The precursor solution of FAxMA1-xPbI3 was composed of PbI2, CH3NH3I, and CH (NH2)2 stirred in a mixture of dimethyl formamide (DMF) to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (9:1, vol/vol) overnight. The concentration of FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 precursor solution was 0.3 mol/ml. The indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated substrates has a sheet resistance of 15 Ω/□. All materials were used directly without any further purification.

Device Fabrication

All the PSCs were fabricated on ITO glass substrates. SnO2 was deposited on the pre-cleaned ITO substrate as an electron transport layer (ETL). Perovskite layers were deposited in the N2-filled glove box at 5000 rpm for 35 s. At 29 s before the spin coating stop, antisolvent toluene was dropped onto the substrate. After that, the substrate was transferred to the hot palate for annealing for 8 min at 80 °C and then for 10 min at 120 °C. After cooling down, the hole transport material Spiro-OMeTAD was deposited on the top of the perovskite layer by spin coating at 3000 rpm for 30 s. After the spin coating of all the layers was finished, the samples were kept out of the glove box overnight for a better oxidation process. Finally, 80 nm of gold (Au) was deposited by the thermal evaporation under 4 × 10−4 Pa vacuum conditions to complete the device structure.

Device Characterization

Current-voltage characterization was carried out with a digital source meter (Keithley Model 2400) at AM 1.5G at 100 mW cm−2. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) measurements were made by 4800. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected with a D/max 2200 V X-ray powder diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.540 A). Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements were taken using the MFP-3D infinity of Asylum Research. All characterizations were accomplished under constant exposure to ambient conditions and without device encapsulation.


In our work, a precisely small amount of FA cations is introduced into MA cations of standard MAPbI3-based perovskite film to enhance the film quality in terms of smoothness and crystallinity with full surface coverage. The remarkable PCE of 22.02% and significantly enhanced JSC has been obtained from the PSCs based on FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 perovskite. Furthermore, the enhancement in VOC as a consequence of reduced carrier recombination is also obtained. These results reveal that high-efficiency PSCs with superior stability can be repeatability fabricated based on the compact, smooth perovskite film with improved crystallinity enabled by the incorporation of a small value of FAI cations into MAPbI3.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets supporting the results of this article are included within the article.



Perovskite solar cell


Scanning electron microscopy


X-ray diffraction


Full width and half maximum




Time-resolved photoluminescence


Kelvin probe force microscopy


Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy


  1. Tsai C-H, Lin C-M, Kuei C-H (2018) Improving the performance of perovskite solar cells by adding 1,8-diiodooctane in the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite layer. Solar Energy 176:178–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olthof S (2016) Research Update: the electronic structure of hybrid perovskite layers and their energetic alignment in devices. APL Materials 4(9):091502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. <pv-efficiency-chart.20190103.pdf>.

  4. Lei H, Yang G, Zheng X, Zhang Z-G, Chen C, Ma J, Guo Y, Chen Z, Qin P, Li Y, Fang G (2017) Incorporation of high-mobility and room-temperature-deposited CuxS as a hole transport layer for efficient and stable organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Solar RRL 1(6):1700038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen J, Xu J, Xiao L, Zhang B, Dai S, Yao J (2017) Mixed-organic-cation (FA)x(MA)1-xPbI3 planar perovskite solar cells with 16.48% efficiency via a low-pressure vapor-assisted solution process. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 9(3):2449–2458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tong X, Lin F, Wu J, Wang ZM. ( 2016) High performance perovskite solar vcells. Advanced Science.;3(5):1500201.

  7. Zhu L, Xiao J, Shi J, Wang J, Lv S, Xu Y, Luo Y, Xiao Y, Wang S, Meng Q, Li X, Li D (2014) Efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells with 2TPA-n-DP hole-transporting layers. Nano Research 8(4):1116–1127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li X, Yang J, Jiang Q, Chu W, Zhang D, Zhou Z, Ren Y, Xin J (2017) Enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability in mixed-cation perovskite solar cells via compositional modulation. Electrochimica Acta 247:460–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao W, Yao Z, Yu F, Yang D, Liu SF (2017) Alkali metal doping for improved CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Advanced science 5(2):1700131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Z, Chen X, Wu H, Wu X, Cao G (2016) Probing the photovoltage and photocurrent in perovskite solar cells with nanoscale resolution. Advanced Functional Materials. 26(18):3048–3058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordillo Guzmán G, Peña Camargo CF, Luis Rincón LC (2018) Evaluation of the effect that the substitution of the ion MA by the ion Cs produces on the properties of thin films of CsxMA1-xPbI3 prepared by spin-coating. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 750:286–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tress W (2017) Perovskite solar cells on the way to their radiative efficiency limit - insights into a success story of high open-circuit voltage and low recombination. Advanced Energy Materials 7(14):1602358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao W, Zhao D, Yu Y, Shrestha N, Ghimire K, Grice CR, Wang C, Xiao Y, Cimaroli AJ, Ellingson RJ, Podraza NJ, Zhu K, Xiong RG, Yan Y (2016) Fabrication of efficient low-bandgap perovskite solar cells by combining formamidinium tin iodide with methylammonium lead iodide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 138(38):12360–12363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Adhikari N, Dubey A, Khatiwada D, Mitul AF, Wang Q, Venkatesan S, et al. (2015) Interfacial study to suppress charge carrier recombination for high efficiency perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(48):2644–2654.

  15. Saliba M, Matsui T, Seo JY, Domanski K, Correa-Baena JP, Nazeeruddin MK, Zakeeruddin SM, Tress W, Abate A, Hagfeldt A, Gratzel (2016) Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ Sci 9 (6), 1989-1997.

  16. Pellet N, Gao P, Gregori G, Yang TY, Nazeeruddin MK, Maier J, Gratzel M (2014) Mixed-organic-cation perovskite photovoltaics for enhanced solar-light harvesting. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53(12):3151–3157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao M, Zhao L, Wei S, Li Y, Dong B, Xu Z, Wan L, Wang S (2018) Application of mixed-organic-cation for high performance hole-conductor-free perovskite solar cells. J Colloid Interface Sci 510:118–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai Y, Wang S, Sun M, Li X, Xiao Y (2018) Mixed cations and mixed halide perovskite solar cell with lead thiocyanate additive for high efficiency and long-term moisture stability. Organic Electronics. 53:249–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li JJ, Ma JY, Ge QQ, Hu JS, Wang D, Wan LJ (2015) Microscopic investigation of grain boundaries in organolead halide perovskite solar cells. ACS applied materials & interfaces 7(51):28518–28523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adhikari N, Dubey A, Khatiwada D, Mitul AF, Wang Q, Venkatesan S, Iefanova A, Zai J, Qian X, Kumar M, Qiao Q (2015) Interfacial study to suppress charge carrier recombination for high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Vol. 7:26445–26454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou N, Cheng Q, Li L, Zhou H (2018) Doping effects in SnO2 transport material for high performance planar perovskite solar cells. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 51(39):394001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang M, Zheng S, Wan X, Su Y, Ke N, Zhao N et al (2013) Limit of VOC in polymeric bulk heterojunction solar cells predicted by a double-junction model. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 108:17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ravishankar S, Gharibzadeh S, Roldán-Carmona C, Grancini G, Lee Y, Ralaiarisoa M et al (2018) Influence of charge transport layers on open-circuit voltage and hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. Joule. 2(4):788–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Grancini G, Feng Y, Asiri AM, Nazeeruddin MK (2017) Optimization of stable quasi-cubic FAxMA1-xPbI3 perovskite structure for solar cells with efficiency beyond 20%. ACS Energy Lett. 1(4):788–798

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan H, Che F, Wei M, Zhao Y, Saidaminov M, Todorovic I, Broberg P, Walters D, Tan G, Zhuang F, Sun T, Liang B, Yuan Z, Fron H, Kim E, Yang J et al. (2018) Dipolar cations confer defect tolerance in wide-bandgap metal halide perovskites. Nat Commun. 6;9(1):3100.

  26. Frost JM et al (2014) Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett (14):2584–2590

  27. Chen P, Bai Y, Wang S, Lyu M, Yun J-H et al (2018) In situ growth of 2D perovskite capping layer for stable and efficient perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater (28):1706923

  28. Zhanga T, Wanga F, Zhanga P, Wanga Y, Chena H, Lia J et al (2019) Low-temperature processed inorganic perovskites for flexible detectors with broadband photoresponse. Nanoscale 11(6):2871–2877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi B, Wang J (2013) Fill factor in organic solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(23):8972–8982.

  30. Shi J, Dong J, Lv S, Xu Y, Zhu L, Xiao J, Xu X, Wu H, Li D, Luo Y, Meng Q (2014) Hole-conductor-free perovskite organic lead iodide heterojunction thin-film solar cells: high efficiency and junction property. Applied Physics Letters 104(6):063901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ke W, Fang G, Wan J, Tao H, Liu Q, Xiong L, Qin P, Wang J, Lei H, Yang G, Qin M, Zhao X, Yan Y (2015) Efficient hole-blocking layer-free planar halide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Nature communications 6:6700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Christians JA, Fung RC, Kamat PV (2014) An inorganic hole conductor for organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 136(2):758–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. You J, Yang Y, Hong Z, Song T-B, Meng L, Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhou H, Chang W-H, Li G, Yang Y (2014) Moisture assisted perovskite film growth for high performance solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 105(18):183902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang JF, Zhu L, Zhao BG, et al (2017) Surface engineering of perovskite films for efficient solar cells. Sci Rep 7(1):14478.

Download references


Special thanks to Ms. Dong Jie from Beijing Jiaotong University for her valuable suggestions.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61575019 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities with the Grant No. 2017RC015, No. 2017RC034, and No. 2017JBZ105

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Ayman Maqsood designed the experiments and fabricated the solar cells. Ayman Maqsood, Yaoyao Li, and Juan Meng performed the characterizations and prepared the manuscript. ZhengXU, Dandan Song, Bo Qiao, and Suiling Zhao analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maqsood, A., Li, Y., Meng, J. et al. Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Compact, Smooth FA0.1MA0.9PbI3 Film with Efficiency Exceeding 22%. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 89 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Mixed cations
  • Morphology control
  • Lead halide perovskite
  • Perovskite solar cells