Skip to main content

Widely Tunable Single/Dual RF Signal Generation by a Monolithic Three-Section DFB Laser


A three-section distributed feedback laser with a 2.5 InP/air pair of distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) was fabricated and analyzed in terms of its microwave generation capability. A widely tunable single radio frequency (RF) signal can be detected using optical heterodyning, and the tuning range is from 2 to 45 GHz. The incorporation of the third section provides an opportunity to present the dual RF operation when three emission peaks are near to each other in the wavelength domain. The proposed design provides a 21.3% enhancement in the RF tuning range compared with the range of a two-section laser (35.29 GHz versus 42.81 GHz). The compactness of the proposed device can be useful for future radio-over-fiber applications.


With the advent of future novel wireless technology, the installation of cellular network has evolved to a new era: a large number of micro- or nano-sized base stations are required, and a power-efficient microwave transmission can be expected [1, 2]. To construct this wireless infrastructure, a good microwave source is necessary. In the past, several methods have been proposed and demonstrated to generate microwaves (such as X/Ka-bands). Using electron-beam and backward oscillators (BWO) can provide high intensity of microwaves (usually in the range of several hundred megawatts to even giga-watts), and they are widely applied in the field of radar, remote sensing, communications, and plasma sciences [3,4,5]. However, this technology is difficult to tune the emission frequency because it is pre-determined by the fixed wave-guiding structure, and the size of this structure is usually in millimeter or centimeter. Another method is to apply transferred electron effect in a Gunn diode [6,7,8,9]. The semiconductor feature of the Gunn diode is very attractive as its size can range from tens of microns to even sub-microns. The delivered power output is also impressive: from several to tens of milliwatts. But the device usually requires other circuitry to provide good signal, and it also has a limited frequency tunability which is bounded by inherent carrier transmit time across the length of the device [10].

In addition to these traditional methods, the future wireless base station requires not only high efficiency but also small footprint and large-scale deployment. A small station architecture and the implementation of a massive multiple-input and multiple-output system demonstrate the need for microwave photonics [11]. Photonic devices and infrastructures can reduce the complexity of a network, increase transmission distance, and enhance transmission security. A combination of a picocell (small cell) and a fiber network can efficiently transmit a large quantity of data over a long distance [12]. Therefore, a different type of photonic device is necessary to realize such schemes, especially to generate a strong RF signal with high tunability and to enable multi-tasking. An injection-locked laser system was proposed for narrow linewidth RF generation [13]. Heterodyning multiple lasers with an optical phase-locked loop has been used to generate high-quality single- or dual-channel of RF signals and other circuitry to provide good signal, and data transmission can be shown in these schemes previously [14,15,16]. Multiple laser integration for microwave generation can be realized using arrayed waveguide grating (AWG) integration [17] and a serial cascaded programmable interrupt controller [18]. All these studies have relied on precisely aligned optics and multiple laser sources to provide sufficient photons to interact.

To further reduce the required footprint of the system, an integrated design is necessary. Considering all the methods that were previously published, we believe integrated microwave photonic generation could be a good candidate [18] because (a) the size of the chip can be scaled down similar to Si wafers. The current size of our photonic chips can range from tens to hundreds of microns, but further reduction in footprint is possible. (b) Photonic mixing can provide some of the best RF signals in the past literatures. For example, by using injection locking scheme, the phase noise can be greatly reduced, which is very important for the RF signal [19]. (c) External electrical current for widely tunable RF signal. By adjusting injection currents, the microwave photonic chips can easily realize a wide range of frequency generation via various interactions of photons such as refractive index change or optical heterodyne, etc. [20, 21]. The variety of physical properties of photons makes photonic chip very versatile in terms of frequency tuning. To fully utilize the aforementioned photonic advantages, different colors of coherent photons shall be able to be integrated in this chip design. In this study, a three-section distributed feedback (DFB) laser with DBR optical isolation was developed for the first time. The proposed laser can operate as either a simple tunable RF carrier or a carrier and data source with two RF tones. The characteristics of this integrated device can be fully investigated and analyzed, and we posit that this device can be beneficial for future microwave photonic integration.


Device Fabrication

In this study, wafers were first grown using a metalorganic chemical vapor deposition system. InGaAsP quantum wells were used as the active region, and the targeted lasing wavelength was approximately 1550 nm. The gratings of the DFB lasers were manufactured using e-beam lithography. After the epitaxial procedure was completed, the wafer was processed with the standard semiconductor processes of film deposition, dry/wet etching, and metallization that are described in [21]. The wafer was thinned down to 100 μm and polished for backside metal contact deposition (AuGe/Ni/Au) to finishing all the processing steps. The next step would be cutting the wafer into bars and dicing the bars into chips for packaging, and the size of the chip is 250 × 900 μm2. The integrated laser chip was attached on a ceramic submount and wire bonded for probing and testing. An air/semiconductor distributed Bragg reflector was etched using a nanoscale focused ion beam (FIB) system (Tescan model no. GAIA3). FIB technology employs accelerated Ga ions with 30 keV energy and 0.4 nA beam current to bombard the target semiconductor (such as InP or Si) away. With its nanometer scale accuracy, the FIB system can realize the inter-section DBR for the three-section laser. The DBR is composed of air and InP sections with a width of 1162 nm for the air section and 584 nm for InP section. The deepest etch is 7 μm into the wafer. To control interfacial roughness of air/semiconductor, we optimized the FIB etch rate to 33 nm/s. Figure 1 displays the schematic and SEM image of the finished device. The 2.5 pairs of air/InP DBRs between the section can provide both high optical reflectivity and electrical isolation, and they divide an integrated chip into three sections: S1, M, and S2, as shown in Fig. 1. We adapt the notation from injection locking lasers in which the master and slave lasers are commonly used for pumping and pumped devices.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic and SEM image of the three-section DFB laser device

Optical Heterodyning

Optical heterodyning is a method of generating an RF signal in many microwave photonic structures [22, 23]. This technique generates a tunable RF signal by mixing different wavelengths of photons [24, 25]. First, we defined the two different signals E1 and E2 as follows:

$$ {E}_1={\mathrm{E}}_{01}\left({\upomega}_1t+{\upvarphi}_1\right), $$
$$ {E}_2={\mathrm{E}}_{02}\left({\upomega}_2t+{\upvarphi}_2\right), $$

where E01 and E02 are the amplitudes, ω1 and ω2 are the frequencies, and φ1 and φ2 are the phases corresponding to E1 and E2, respectively. Then, the intensity of the total mixing signal It can be described as follows [26]:

$$ {I}_t={\left({E}_1+{E}_2\right)}^2={E_{01}}^2{\mathit{\cos}}^2\left({\upomega}_1\mathrm{t}+{\upvarphi}_1\right)+{E_{02}}^2{\mathit{\cos}}^2\left({\upomega}_2\mathrm{t}+{\upvarphi}_2\right)+{E}_{01}{E}_{02}\left\{\mathit{\cos}\left[\left({\upomega}_1+{\upomega}_2\right)t+\left({\upvarphi}_1+{\upvarphi}_2\right)\right]+\mathit{\cos}\left[\left({\upomega}_1-{\upomega}_2\right)t+\left({\upvarphi}_1-{\upvarphi}_2\right)\right]\right\}, $$

While measuring the total signal, only the E01E02 × cos[(ω1 − ω2)t + (φ1 − φ2)] term can be observed because the high-frequency terms (such as ω1 and ω2 and ω1 + ω2) are above the detection limit of the photodetector. The final detected RF signal is obtained at the following frequency:

$$ \Delta \mathrm{f}=\mathrm{c}\;\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_1}\hbox{-} \frac{1}{\lambda_2}\right) $$

In the current device, photons with multiple wavelengths can be generated simultaneously such that a heterodyne can occur at different frequencies simultaneously. Because the emission wavelength of each laser can be controlled by the injection current, various combinations of currents can provide single and dual RF output signals from the same device. These conditions are discussed later in the paper.

Measurement System

To appropriately evaluate laser devices, the output power is carefully fiber coupled into a calibrated photodetector (PD). The fiber end was cleaved at an 8° tilt to reduce the facet reflection. A polarization controller and proper isolators were installed to ensure minimum feedback to the laser and maximum output power after heterodyning. An erbium-doped fiber amplifier is an optional piece of equipment that can be neglected if the signal is sufficiently strong. A high-speed photodetector (a 50-GHz PD, u2tPhotonics®, AG) or another PD (1414, New Focus®) was used to detect the mixed photonic signal. The electrical signal obtained after heterodyning was input into a signal analyzer (N9030PXA, Keysight®), and the differential frequency spectrum of the signal was presented. On the other side, the combined optical spectrum was read using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA; AQ6317B, Ando®).


DC Device Characteristics

Once device fabrication is completed, the DC characteristics can be tested. Figure 2a displays the generic power–current–voltage (L–I–V) curves of a generic DFB laser fabricated using this wafer. The threshold current can be smaller than 10 mA. The individual devices have a 300-μm long cavity and output power in the order of milliwatts. The grating in the structure provides necessary feedback and mode selection to allow the laser to operate in the single mode. The power spectrum observed when the three lasers are switched on is presented in Fig. 2b. A high side mode suppression ratio larger than 50 dB was measured for the single DFB case. Favorable single-mode operation is essential for the optical heterodyning to be successful. When the optical signals are taken from the two sides, the S1 and S2 sections exhibit a stronger response compared with the response of the middle section (M section), as presented in Fig. 2b because of the high reflection from the central DBR sections that block the output power from the M section. The optical mode spacing can be changed using the electrical injection currents. This flexibility provides a variety of combinations of the three modes of these lasers. Figure 3 displays the current-dependent optical spectra. All the three peaks can be adjusted, and the spacing between two peaks can be critical for the RF signal generation. When the two peaks are sufficiently close, four-wave mixing (FWM) occurs between these two wavelengths of photons [27]. When two peaks are far apart, no FWM effect is present. The FWM enhances from the nonlinear modulation of carrier concentration in the laser gain medium [27]. The modulation leads to the stronger heterodyne effect among different colors of photons and can produce a stronger RF output signal. In the top curve presented in Fig. 3, several peaks are generated in the optical spectrum due to this strong FWM interaction. The spacing between the peaks is still the same as the difference between the two original mixed frequencies.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Generic LIV curves of the DFB laser. b Optical spectrum with one, two, and three DFB lasers switched on

Fig. 3
figure 3

Optical spectrum of a three-section laser with and without the FWM effect. The legend presents the current combination (in mA) of S1–M–S2 section in each spectrum

Widely Tunable Single-Mode RF Generation

When the injection current varies, the emission wavelength of the DFB laser varies, as aforementioned. Thus, the outcome of optical heterodyning changes accordingly in this device. The heterodyned RF signal can be measured using a high-speed photodetector [20]. The quality of the signal can be identified using a PXA setup. Figure 4a displays detailed electrical spectra of the synthesized RF signal. The single-mode signal rises 40.4 dB above the noise floor, and the peak intensity can be as high as − 20 dB. The finer resolution on the RF spectrum reveals the details of the signal, and the spectrum can be fitted using the Lorentzian function to determine the linewidth. The usual linewidth is approximately 12 to 16 MHz, as shown in Fig. 4b. The individual linewidth of the RF peak is defined by the addition of the linewidths of the peaks of the DFB lasers, which ranges from 5 to 7 MHz in this wafer. One of the important features of this design is the widely tunable single-mode RF generation. The combination of the three laser tones provides a wider RF distribution range. A single-mode RF signal can be continuously tuned from 2 to 45 GHz.

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Electrical spectra of the synthesized RF signal. a Single mode RF signal. b The linewidth estimation of the single mode RF signal

Dual RF Mode Operation

Due to the additional third section in the laser, the integrated device can provide more complicated RF signal patterns than the lasers with two sections. The dual RF mode in a controllable manner could be a favorable feature for various purposes. In this device, the dual mode occurs only when the three wavelengths of the lasers are close to each other. When the FWM effect can be initiated by all three lasers, two RF signals with different frequencies are observed. In Fig. 5, both optical and electrical spectra are displayed side by side to illustrate this scenario. In this figure, the peaks of sections S1 and M are near at the low current level. Thus, a strong FWM occurs between the S1 and M sections, and a strong RF peak is produced around 7.86 GHz (trace A). We increased the current of section S1 to red-shift its peak toward section S2. The major RF peak frequency increases when the separation between S1 and M sections becomes large (trace B). However, as the peaks of the S1 and S2 sections move closer, the heterodyning effect between these two groups of photons grows stronger. Thus, in trace C, the major RF signal becomes the differential frequency of S1 and S2. Moreover, the interaction between S1 and M remains, and a weaker RF signal corresponding to this interaction is observed at 21.6 GHz. By further increasing the current to S1, the major peak decreases in frequency because the peak of the section S1 red shifts toward the peak of the section S2. Meanwhile, the minor peak blue shifts to a higher frequency because the peak of section S1 moves away from the peak of section M (trace C to E).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Dual-mode a optical and b RF spectra under different current combinations. The currents of the S2 and M sections are kept the same while the current of the S1 section is varied from 20 to 70 mA (shown in a). In the trace A, λMS1S2, and the sequence becomes λMS2S1 in the trace H

In trace F, G, and H, the distance between the emission peak of section S1 and M is very large. Thus, no mixing occurs between these two sections, and S1 gradually surpasses S2 when the current of S1 is increased. The resulting RF peak first reduces and then increases in terms of frequency. This behavior is similar to the previously demonstrated two-section laser.


Effect of the Number of Pairs

The DBR is inserted between the lasers to provide optical isolation between the cavities, to provide sufficient reflection between the two facets of each section of the DFB laser to increase the likelihood of obtaining single-mode emission, and finally, to provide sufficient electrical isolation between the sections. If the number of pairs is very small, then the electrical isolation might not be sufficient to maintain the independent pumping between the sections. Because the resistance of an individual laser diode is approximately equal to or less than 10 Ω, an electrical isolation of 103 Ω or higher is preferred. Moreover, if the number of DBR pairs is very small, the individual sections cannot differentiate their own front or back facet reflectivities, and this can lead to unpredictable lasing modes in the front and back sections (S1 and S2). For the middle section (M section), fewer pairs of DBRs cause an inferior resonant condition and low cavity finesse, thus leading to no lasing at all. Conversely, if the number of DBR pairs is too large, the central section can lase in the multiple mode. Such lasing causes very little, sometimes zero, RF output.

Function of the Middle Section

Due to the limited FWM range in our two-section devices, the RF peak tuning was sometimes bound between 20 and 30 GHz. The strongly coupled two-section laser can also produce many complicated nonlinear modes of operation such as period 1 and chaos, as demonstrated previously [20]. When the third section was inserted into the laser chip, the tuning range was improved due to the extra thermal tuning effect of the devices. As shown in Fig. 6, when the currents of the S1 and S2 sections are fixed, the linearly varying current of the M section can provide an additional increase in RF tuning of 1.68 GHz. The obtained peak of the M section does not cause a strong optical mixing, and thus, all the major RF interactions are between the photons of the S1 and S2 sections. The slight increase in peak separation can also be observed in the traces with high input currents of the M section. In other devices, an increase in the RF of as high as 3.82 GHz was recorded. This additional change in synthesized RF frequency due to extra M section current can render the continuous tuning more feasible in the three-section laser. A comparison between IM values of 0 and 65 mA in a specific device provides a difference of 7.52 GHz (Δf = 42.81 GHz for IM = 65 mA, and Δf = 35.29 GHz for IM = 0) in the tuning range. In general, several GHz tuning range can be added when M section is activated electrically and the change of current combinations can add up and increase the overall tuning range considerably. This phenomenon can be attributed to unequal thermal-wavelength dependence in the individual devices. The inequality is due to factors such as local doping variation, an uncut FIB region (causing leakage), and the nonlinear current dependence of the emission wavelength. In most cases, the RF peak frequency tends to increase when the third section is activated.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Optical spectrum of a three-section laser with two side sections (S1 and S2) with fixed inputs. The current injected to the middle section (M) increases from 0 to 70 mA. The inset presents the corresponding increase frequency in the RFs

Single or Dual Mode Operation

The analysis of the three-section laser operation appears complicated at first. In this paragraph, we bring perspective to a fundamental concern, whether the device will operate in the single or dual mode. Figure 7 presents the two most common modes of operation of our three-section laser. The mutual locations in the optical domain revealed that two cases were considered: in the first case, the third peak was far away from the remaining two peaks. In the second case, the third peak was actively close to the peaks in the S1 and S2 sections. In the first case, which is shown in Fig. 7a, the photons that are far away (peak of the M section) have very few interactions with the other two peaks (peaks of the S1 and S2 sections). Only the peaks of the S1 and S2 sections are sufficiently close to exhibit the FWM effect. In this condition, the three-section laser acts like the previously demonstrated two-section laser and a single RF peak is generated by mixing the peaks of the S1 and S2 sections. The function of the peak of the M section is to provide an extension or reduction of the RF peak based on the thermal-wavelength coefficients of the DFB sections. In the second case that is shown in Fig. 7b, the three peaks are near to each other. This case is more complicated. The proximity of photon wavelengths prompts the generation of the FWM effect, and more than one differential frequency can be generated due to this phenomenon. Thus, the top two combinations among the S1, S2, and M sections provide the constituent components in RF spectrum, and the laser can operate in the dual RF mode. However, once one of the FWM is weakened by the separation of the peaks due to current injection, the device returns to the single mode.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Comprehensive diagram of the operation modes for three-section DFB lasers: a One peak is far away and the other two are close to each other, and b all three peaks are close to each other


A three-section laser was fabricated for the purpose of RF generation. In this laser, 2.5 InP/air pairs of DBRs were placed between the sections. This multiple section laser provides a single-mode RF signal that has high tunability from 2 to 45 GHz. The additional third section enables thermal tuning for this single-mode operation and also is essential for the dual RF mode operation. A strong FWM phenomenon was observed from the optical spectra and was confirmed by conducting RF peak measurement. The current-dependent wavelength-shift model can be applied for the verification of the RFs. The proposed three-section laser provides a 21.3% enhancement in the RF tuning range compared with the range of the two-section laser. In addition to the single-mode operation, a dual-mode RF signal was also demonstrated when the wavelengths of the three lasers are close to each other. The RF frequencies in the dual-mode operation can be modified by the direct current injection to any of the sections. We believe that the proposed laser will be useful for improving the performance of future microwave photonic devices and obtaining a highly efficient microwave photonic network.

Availability of Data and Materials

All the data and materials in the manuscript are available.



Distributed Bragg reflectors




Arrayed waveguide grating


Backward oscillators


Distributed feedback


Focused ion beam




Optical spectrum analyzer


Four-wave mixing


  1. Han SS, Xu ICZ, Rowell C (2015). Large-scale antenna systems with hybrid analog and digital beam forming for millimeter wave 5G. IEEE Communications Magazine 53(1):186-94.

  2. Roh W, Seol J, Park J, Lee B, Lee J, Kim Y et al (2014) Millimeter-wave beam forming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Communications Magazine 52:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Z-H (2008) Investigation of an oversized backward wave oscillator as a high power microwave generator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92:054102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dapeng Wu, Ting Shu, Jinchuan Ju, and Shengren Peng (2015) Gigawatt-class radiation generated by a Ka-band overmoded Cherenkov-type high power millimeter wave generator. Review of Scientific Instruments 86: 084706

  5. Rukin S (2018) Solid-state repetitive generators of short GW-range pulses: a review. Journal of Instrumentation 13:P08001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura A, Nikaido J, Aoki Y, Shirakata Y, Takase S (2015) High-efficiency low-phase-noise 79-GHz Gunn oscillator module. European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Paris 2015;403-6.

  7. Mindil A, Dunn GM, Khalid A, Oxley CH (2020) Investigation of contact edge effects in the channel of planar Gunn diodes. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 67(1):53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalid A, Dunn G, Macpherson R et al (2014) Terahertz oscillations in an In0.53Ga0.47As submicron planar Gunn diode. Journal of Applied Physics. 115:114502–114502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalid A et al (2013) In0.53Ga0.47As planar Gunn diodes operating at a fundamental frequency of 164 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Letters 34(1):39–41

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simon M. Sze, Chapter 11, in Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Wiley, 2nd Ed., 1981) p. 637-78.

  11. Waterhouse R, Novack D (2015) Realizing 5G: microwave photonics for 5G mobile wireless systems. IEEE Microwave Magazine 16:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Novak D, Waterhouse RB, Nirmalathas A, Lim C, Gamage PA, Clark TR et al (2016) Radio-over-fiber technologies for emerging wireless system. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 52:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg L, Taylor HF, Weller JF, Bloom DM (1983) Microwave signal generation with injection-locked laser diodes. Electronics Letters. 19:491–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davidson AC, Wise FW, Compton RC (1998) Low phase noise 33-40-GHz signal generation using multilaser phase-locked loops. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 10:1304–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Braun, G. Grosskopf, H. Heidrich, Cv. Helmolt, R. Kaiser, K. Kruger, et al.(1998) Optical microwave generation and transmission experiments in the 12-and 60-GHz region for wireless communications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 46: 320-330

  16. Hyodo M, Watanabe M (2003) Optical generation of millimeter-wave signals up to 330 GHz by means of cascadingly phase locking three semiconductor lasers. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 15:458–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carpintero G, Rouvalis E, Lawniczuk K, Fice M, Renaud CC, Leijtens XJM et al (2012) 95 GHz millimeter wave signal generation using an arrayed waveguide grating dual wavelength semiconductor laser. Optics Letter 37:3657–3659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marpaung D, Roeloffzen C, Heidenman R, Leinse A, Sales S, Capmany J (2013) Integrated microwave photonics. Laser& Photonics Review 7:506–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung HK (2006) Strong optical injection locking of edge-emitting lasers and its applications. Ph. D., Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lo YH, Wu YC, Hsu SC, Hwang YC, Chen BC, Lin CC (2014) Tunable microwave generation of a monolithic dual-wavelength distributed feedback laser. Optics Express 22:13125–13137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chien CY, Lo YH, Wu YC, Hsu SC, Tseng HR, Lin CC (2014) Compact photonic integrated chip for tunable microwave generation. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 26:490–493

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simonis GJ, Purchase KG (1990) Optical generation, distribution, and control of microwaves using laser heterodyne. IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 38:667–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qi XQ, Liu JM (2011) Photonic microwave applications of the dynamics of semiconductor lasers. IEEE Journal of selected topics in quantum electronics 17:1198–1211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Claus F. Klingshirn, Chapter 25 in Semiconductor optics. Springer-VerlagGmbh, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany (2012):731-78.

  25. Razdan K, Van Baak DA (2002) Demonstrating optical beat notes through heterodyne experiments. American Journal of Physics 70:1061–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yao J (2009) Microwave photonics. J. Lightwave Technol. 27:314–335

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inoue K, Mukai T, Saitoh T (1987) Nearly degenerate four-wave mixing in a traveling-wave semiconductor laser amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 51:1051–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Prof. H.C. Kuo; Prof. J.H. Chen of NCTU; Dr. Y.J. Cheng of SINICA, Taiwan; and Santur Corporation Inc., USA, for their technical supports.


Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST) (MOST108-2119-M-009-003, MOST107-2218-E-009-056, and MOST107-2221-E-009-114-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



CC and CP designed the experiment, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. HY, YM, FC, CH, and SC carried out the experiments and measurements. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Chung Lin.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, CP., Huang, YM., Shih, HY. et al. Widely Tunable Single/Dual RF Signal Generation by a Monolithic Three-Section DFB Laser. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 84 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • DFB lasers
  • FWM
  • Microwave generation
  • Monolithic integration