Skip to main content

Binder-Free Electrodes and Their Application for Li-Ion Batteries


Lithium-ion batteries (LIB) as energy supply and storage systems have been widely used in electronics, electric vehicles, and utility grids. However, there is an increasing demand to enhance the energy density of LIB. Therefore, the development of new electrode materials with high energy density becomes significant. Although many novel materials have been discovered, issues remain as (1) the weak interaction and interface problem between the binder and the active material (metal oxide, Si, Li, S, etc.), (2) large volume change, (3) low ion/electron conductivity, and (4) self-aggregation of active materials during charge and discharge processes. Currently, the binder-free electrode serves as a promising candidate to address the issues above. Firstly, the interface problem of the binder and active materials can be solved by fixing the active material directly to the conductive substrate. Secondly, the large volume expansion of active materials can be accommodated by the porosity of the binder-free electrode. Thirdly, the ion and electron conductivity can be enhanced by the close contact between the conductive substrate and the active material. Therefore, the binder-free electrode generally exhibits excellent electrochemical performances. The traditional manufacture process contains electrochemically inactive binders and conductive materials, which reduces the specific capacity and energy density of the active materials. When the binder and the conductive material are eliminated, the energy density of the battery can be largely improved. This review presents the preparation, application, and outlook of binder-free electrodes. First, different conductive substrates are introduced, which serve as carriers for the active materials. It is followed by the binder-free electrode fabrication method from the perspectives of chemistry, physics, and electricity. Subsequently, the application of the binder-free electrode in the field of the flexible battery is presented. Finally, the outlook in terms of these processing methods and the applications are provided.


The energy crisis and environmental issues have driven the development of renewable energy and new environmentally friendly energy storage systems. Because of the intermittent problem of renewable energy sources such as wind energy, water energy, and solar energy, batteries are considered to be important energy storage systems [1,2,3]. There is an increasing demand for reliable and efficient energy storage devices. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have attracted much attention due to their high energy and power density, high cell voltage, wide operating temperature range, and long cycle life [4]. Nowadays, the traditional process of the battery preparation uses a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as a binder to fix the conductive agent and the active materials on the current collector by a coating method [5, 6]. With the demand for the LIBs with higher capacity and smaller size, both the development of active materials with high specific capacity and the reduction of inactive materials in the cell are important. The methods to reduce the inactive materials are as following. Firstly, the traditional binder can be replaced by the conductive binder, for example, pyrene-based polymer and polyfluorene-conjugated polymer. These polymers are naturally conductive, and their side-chain or backbone is modified to increase the adhesion [7,8,9,10]. The conductive binder serves as conductive agent. Therefore, the use of inactive carbon in the cell can be reduced. However, the weak interfacial interaction between these binders (both PVDF and new developed binders) and active materials (metallic oxide, Si, Sn, Li, S, etc.) results in the particles self-aggregate or/and isolation from current collector. Therefore, these new materials with high capacity show reduced battery performance [11,12,13,14,15]. Secondly, advanced conductive substrates, for example, carbon cloth, graphene, and Ni foam, are investigated, where active materials can be anchored on the special adhesion sites of substrates. The adhesions between active materials and substrates are achieved by strong chemical and/or physical bonding, which significantly improves the integrity of electrodes. Moreover, this process potentially removes both binder and conductive carbon additives. Therefore, the energy density can be largely improved [16, 17] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

The requirements, fabrication methods, advantages, and future development for binder-free electrode

Great deal of research has demonstrated the numerous advantages of binder-free electrodes [18,19,20,21]. By immobilizing the active materials onto the corresponding electron-conductive substrate, the interfacial problem of binder and active materials can be resolved due to the absence of organic binder covering on the active materials surface [22, 23]. Active materials firmly adhere on the conductive substrate, which highly improves the electron conductivity. The properties of supporting materials, for example, porous structures, facilitate electrolyte penetration, and ion diffusion [24]. Besides, the large surface area has the benefit for the full usage of active materials and the transportation of Li-ions. Moreover, the active material is generally uniformly anchored on the conductive substrate, which can effectively prevent the agglomeration of the nanoparticles and reduce the volume expansion during the repeated cycling process. The binder-free electrodes generally show high Li+ and electron conductivity, decent electrolyte wettability and large volume expansion space, and strong bonding strength. Therefore, the binder-free electrodes exhibit better capacity, cycling, and rate performances than the PVDF/active materials/carbon black system. Specifically, the cycle life of the novel nanomaterials has been increased from dozens of cycles to hundreds of cycles, with a high current density of ~ 10 A g−1.

The conductive substrate as a carrier for the active material is the basis of the binder-free electrode. The conductive matrix needs to have suitable sites for growing active materials, and its mechanical properties play a decisive role in its application. For applications of the electrodes in wearable and flexible electronic devices, conductive substrates need to be able to be bent or even folded multiple times. This is difficult to achieve in conventional electrodes fabricated by the slurry process. The main reason is that the active material is separated from the current collector during the bending process, resulting in the deactivation of the battery. Growing the active materials directly on a flexible network provides a strong interaction and leads to robust electrodes maintaining the high energy density. These flexible substrates mainly include metal foam, carbon cloth, and free-standing films of carbon materials [25].

This review aims to provide an overview of preparation, application, and outlook of binder-free electrodes for LIBs. Our goal is to highlight the recent development and improvement of binder-free electrodes [26]. The doctor blade casting and infiltration methods, which are undoubtedly important to the field of LIBs, will not be included. First, we introduce the different conductive substrates, which serve mainly as carriers for the active materials. We follow with a presentation on the binder-free electrode fabrication method from the perspectives of chemistry, physics, and electricity. Subsequently, the application of the binder-free electrode in the field of the flexible battery is presented. Finally, the key issues concerning these preparation methods and their applications are prospected.

Conductive Substrate

The conductive substrate is the current collector with good electronic conductivity. Therefore, the material is generally composed of metal or carbon material. Due to manufacturing limitations, metal current collectors are typically fabricated into films, meshes [27], and foams [28]. Metal products are generally rigid and are not easily recovered after deformation; therefore, they are only suitable for high energy density batteries of the same configuration as slurry-based batteries. Copper and aluminum are used as a negative and positive current collector, respectively, due to the different oxidation resistance [29]. Metal foam has the advantages of light weight, large area, three-dimensional structure, and the like, which is often used for binder-free electrodes [30].

Carbon materials originate from a range of sources and are very flexible in their preparation [31]. These materials can be derived from a wide variety of biological materials in nature, as well as chemically prepared carbon nanotubes, graphene, and porous carbon structures from organic materials [17, 32]. Compared with metal, some kinds of carbon materials are lighter in weight and have great flexibility (flexible, foldable, etc.). Carbon cloth is increasingly applied in energy storage due to its excellent electrical conductivity and flexibility [33].

Chemical Methods

Thermal Treatment

Thermal treatment is one of the common methods of preparing a binder-free electrode. This method is to change the physical and chemical properties of the material by means of heating and cooling process. After heat treatment, the inorganic salt is converted to the corresponding metal oxide, and the polymer will dehydrate to form a carbon conductive structure (Fig. 2). For the preparation of binder-free electrodes, thermal treatment is generally used to immobilize the active material or to construct a self-supporting backbone.

Fig. 2

Thermal treatment for the commercially available structure (a) and fabricated structure (b). a1 Metallic oxide nanoparticles can be obtained on the surface of an metal structure via a simple thermal oxidation progress [34]. a2 The active materials can be synthesized on the surface of conductive structure by thermal treatment [35]. a3 Biomass can be carbonized to achieve the carbon architecture [32]. b1 The mixture of polymer and active materials can be carbonized to achieve the binder-free electrode [36]. b2 Hierarchical structure can be obtained by multiple processes [37]. b3 Binder-free electrode can be obtained by thermal treatment the electrospinning membrane [38]

The commercially available structure is utilized as supporting skeleton to immobilize active materials. These materials consist of metal meshes, carbon fibers, commercial sponges, and biological derivatives and commercial sponge [39], etc. (Fig. 2a). Metallic oxide nanoparticles can be synthesized on the surface of metal current collectors via simple thermal oxidation progress [34] (Fig. 2a1). Without any further treatment, these current collectors can be used directly as supporting materials for binder-free LIBs. Iron mesh-supported Fe2O3 shows a very high discharge capacity of 1050 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles. Thermal treatment of the conductive membrane with precursor’s solution of active materials is a widely developed method for the fabrication of binder-free electrodes (Fig. 2a2). A representative example is that the ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets coated at the surface of active carbon fiber (ACF) cloth can be fabricated by immersing in the (NH4)2MoS4 solution followed by annealing. The electrochemical performances are demonstrated that the discharge capacity of 971 mAh g−1 is achieved at a current density of 100 mA g−1 [35]. Thermal treatment of biomass materials is a simple method for preparation of binder-free electrode. Ozkan and coworkers carbonized the portobello mushroom as binder-free LIBs anodes (Fig. 2a3) [32]. At high temperature, the structure of biomass materials can be remain, and the naturally presented heteroatoms and metal ions can dope in the carbon materials, which increases the electrochemical performances such as electron conductivity and capacity.

The polymer is the main material for constructing the self-supporting skeleton of the binder-free electrode, and the skeleton structure is determined by the polymer and its preparation method (Fig. 2b) [40]. Firstly, for the common polymers, pyrolysis of polymer-active materials composite film at 550 °C can prepare binder-free electrode (Fig. 2b1) [36]. The Si/SiOx/PAN composite electrode is prepared by this method [41, 42]. After annealing, the polyacrylonitrile (PAN) can be converted to N-doped conductive structure, and the carbon network not only stabilizes the SEI and accommodate the volume changes but also provide good flexibility and mechanical strength for the electrode. Similarly, Si/rGO electrode can be obtained by casting Si, reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) suspension onto nickel foam followed by an annealing process [43]. Secondly, the layer-by-layer (LBL) process is an attractive way to make complex structures and nanomaterials. An electrode with multiple layers can be fabricated by immersing the Ti foil in poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA) solution, graphene oxide (GO) suspension, PDDA solution, and aqueous H3PMo12O40 at certain cycles, then followed by thermal treatment at 500 °C [44]. Such LBL method can be applied to prepare a binder-free electrode on a large scale. This kind of method is suitable for making mesoporous anatase TiO2/nickel foam [45], MoS2 nanosheet/ACF, and multilayer GeO2/rGO (Fig. 2b2) [37, 46]. Last, binder-free electrodes can be fabricated by encapsulation of active materials into polymers and then fabrication to novel nanostructure (Fig. 2b3). Flexible hierarchical nanofibers mats can be synthesized by electrospinning and subsequent thermal treatment.

There are many merits for commercially available and fabricated structure. The active material is coated on the surface of the commercially available structure while the fabricated structure acts as a container to encapsulate the active material. In contrast to the encapsulation of active materials, the surface coating makes the more contact of active materials and electrolyte. Therefore, it results in the better rate performance but lower initial Coulombic efficiency and poor cycling performance.

Hydrothermal Treatment

The hydrothermal method is widely used in different disciplines in past several decades. Currently, this technique has made great effort in terms of mechanisms interpretation and material fabrication. For the hydrothermal process, metal ions are dissolved in the solution which afterwards forms a supersaturated solution at high temperature and pressure. During this process, crystal growth occurs at the nucleation point of the substrate. Comparing to the aggregated particles prepared by thermal treatment, the hydrothermal method can produce high-pure, uniform, monodispersed, and controllable nanoscale materials under mild conditions. The hydrothermal process of fine nanostructure has attracted widespread attention in energy storage materials.

An overall synthetic process for the preparation binder-free electrode using hydrothermal method is similar to the procedure described in Fig. 3a. Supporting materials are first obtained. If the supporting materials are smooth with limited nucleating points, the deposition of active materials on their surface would be prohibited. Generally, the carbon cloth needs acidic or thermal treatment to become more hydrophilic. Besides, the pH of the solution should be adjusted by adding a suitable precipitant to promote the growth of the precursor on the surface of the substrate. The obtained materials are thermally treated to obtain the desired composite while maintaining the nanostructure. Hu, Zhang, and coworkers reported a scalable method for the preparation of ZnxCo3-xO4 nanocubes/CNFs (carbon nano-fibers, CNFs). The cube’s size can be adjusted by the pH applied in the hydrothermal process [47].

Fig. 3

a The scheme of ZnCoOx/CNF composite fabrication [47]. b The fabrication of cathode electrode using hydrothermal method [48]

The hydrothermal method can fabricate single and multiple component [49]. Many morphologies of binder-free electrodes have been developed, such as TiO2 nanorods on carbon nanotube (CNT) scaffold [50], Fe3O4 nanoparticles, NiO nanocones, Ni(OH)2 nanosheets and Fe3O4/Ni/C nanoplates grown on Ni foam [51,52,53,54], MnO2 nanoflakes on graphene foam [55], and FeF3·0.33H2O flower-like arrays on carbon fiber [56]. Li and coworkers grew NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays showing unique 3D structure, in which NiCo2S4 nanotubes show 5 nm in length and 100 nm in width [57]. Porous NiCo2O4 nanoneedles grown on 3D graphene network can be obtained by using NiCl2·6H2O and CoCl2·6H2O as the precursors [58]. These nanostructures homogeneously distribute on the conductive substrate. Therefore, these composites not only facilitate the electron transfer and accommodate the volume changes of the active materials during discharge/charge process, but also improve the electrochemical properties with high capacity, high rate capability, and cycling stability for LIBs. Specifically, Fe3O4 nanoparticle@Ni foam showed a reversible capacity of 543 mA h g−1 at the current density of 10 C after more than 2000 cycles [51]. NiO arrays@Ni foam can deliver a capacity of 969 mAh g−1 at the current density of 0.5 C and still remain about 605.9 mAh g−1 at 10 C [52].

It is worth noting that hydrothermal method is a good strategy to achieve the lithiation of metal oxides for cathode materials. Conventional lithiation requires uniform mixing of the precursor with Li salt, which is every difficult to obtain the desired binder-free electrodes. Hydrothermal lithiation is a solution method that does not require the treatment of the precursor, so it is one of the attractive methods for fabricating the binder-free cathode electrode. In 2018, Xia et al. prepared the porous LiCoO2 binder-free cathode with Au-coated stainless steel as substrates by the hydrothermal lithiation of Co3O4 precursor (Fig. 3b) [48]. This electrode shows excellent rate and cycling performances with a capacity of 104.6 mA h g−1 at 10 C rate and the capacity retention of 81.8% after 1000 cycles.

Chemical Bath Deposition

Chemical bath deposition (CBD) is a process of in situ growth of active materials on the substrate through a chemical reaction. Comparing with the hydrothermal method, this synthesis method is easy to scale up and allows nanomaterials to grow at low temperature and ambient pressure without using special equipment. Besides, the CBD and hydrothermal method grow materials on the surface of substrates via a similar mechanism, so the requirements for the substrates are very similar. As the same to the procedure as shown in Fig. 4a, the precursor of active materials would nucleate and grow by adjusting the pH and temperature of reactions. For example, 3D graphene/MnO2 hybrids are prepared by the presence of 3D graphene aerogel in the acidic KMnO4 solution [59].

Fig. 4

a Schematic illustration of the preparation of 3D graphene/MnO2 hybrid, and illustrations of electrons transfer on 3D graphene/MnO2 hybrid [59]. b CBD method for the fabrication of CNF@Ni(OH)2 [60]. b1–3 Different hybrid membranes with increase of concentrations of Ni(NO3)2 solution. c Schematic of the synthesis procedure for the PVP@S-SACNT composite [61]

The morphology of active materials is influenced by supporting materials, reacting time, and precursor concentration (Fig. 4b). The substrate determines the initial nucleation sites. For example, the morphology of MnO2 is nanosheet and nanoparticle on the substrate of graphene and CNTs, respectively [62, 63]. In addition, the morphology of active materials on the supporting material is influenced by precursor concentration. For example, thin Ni(OH)2 nanosheets begin to form and grow perpendicularly on the surface of nanofibers at low Ni(NO3)2 concentration (Fig. 4b) [60]. However, with the increase of Ni salt concentrations, a thick layer of Ni(OH)2 nanosheets is gradually formed, which may be attributed to the rapid and homogeneous nucleation of Ni(OH)2. Therefore, the morphology of active materials on the supporting material can be various, such as particles [64], sheath, nanosheet [65], and nanowires [66, 67]. Similar to the electrode prepared by hydrothermal method, the porous and conductive architecture with nanoscale materials can provide continuous channels for rapid diffusion of lithium ions and efficient transport of electrons for fast lithiation/delithiation.

Sulfur, a very promising cathode material, can be synthesized by CBD under mild conditions. The sulfur material is based on a simple reaction between Na2S2O3 and acids in an aqueous solution at room temperature. The process is simple and environmentally benign. When a suitable template or surfactant is applied, the special nano-sulfur structure can be obtained [68]. When the conductive materials can absorb S2O32-, a great quantity of sulfur is generated at the interphases. Graphene modified by phenyl sulfonated functional groups allows the uniform deposition of sulfur via an in situ redox reaction [69]. The binder-free PVP-encapsulated sulfur electrode is prepared by the in situ immobilize the sulfur nanoparticles onto the conductive network (Fig. 4c). PVP is an amphiphilic polymer with a hydrophobic alkyl chain and hydrophilic amide groups that can be used as a dispersing agent. When sulfur starts to form after adding acid into the solution, the hydrophobic nature of PVP makes it preferentially coat onto the S surface forming a dense layer to protect polysulfides dissolution [61].

Chemical Vapor Deposition

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a chemical reaction in which a gaseous substance deposits on the surface of a hot substrate. This method can produce the uniform film on the three-dimensional structure and nanowires with the assistance of catalysts. The CVD process consists of three steps: (1) diffusion and absorption of the reaction gases on the surface of the hot substrate, (2) reactions of the gases at the active site to form a coating material, and (3) exhaust of the generated gas. By controlling the temperature, pressure, gases ratio and type, the desired coating material can be obtained.

CVD method can directly grow active materials. An impressive example corresponding to the CVD process was reported by Tay and coworkers [70]. 3D nickel foam/CNTs composite is synthesized with nickel foam as the substrate and ethanol as both precursor and carbon source. The obtained CNTs serve as substrates for the deposition of NiO nanosheet growth. Amorphous FeVO4 nanosheet arrays can directly grow on a flexible stainless steel substrate with VCl3 as the precursor. It can deliver reversible capacities of 601 mAh g−1 and 453 mAh g−1 at the high current density of 8 C and 15 C, respectively [71].

Surface layers prepared by CVD also serve as protective interfaces between the electrode and the electrolyte. Yang and coworkers used ethylene as the carbon precursor to coat active materials through a CVD process, which not only improves the stability of the structure but also forms an excellent electronic conductive network. The Si nanowires with a carbon coating layer show a good rate performance [72, 73]. In 2016, Cui et al. showed the porous materials with a thin layer of lithiophilic materials prepared by CVD method can serve as the scaffold promoting the uniform deposition of Li-ion [74]. This material shows a stable cycling performance with a small overpotential even at a high current density of 3 mA/cm2 during charge and discharge processes.

CVD method is one of the main strategies for the fabrication of advanced Si materials. Silicon is the most promising anode material for next generation LIBs due to the highest specific capacity of 4200 mAh g−1 and low operation voltage [75]. However, silicon suffers from huge volume changes, which leads to continuous formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI), pulverization, and capacity fading during cycling processes [76]. In general, advanced silicon materials can be prepared by post-treatment of silicon particles or by reduction of silicon dioxide. CVD is desirable way to prepare thin film or nanowire silicon by reducing or pyrolyzing high-purity silane or silane substitutes. In 2008, Cui et al. used CVD method to synthesize silicon nanowires (Si NWs) on the stainless steel with Au nanoparticles as catalysts and successfully applied it as anode for LIBs [77]. Silicon nanowires with a diameter of about 89 nm can accommodate 400% volume change without cracking. In addition, the nanowires are directly grown on the current collector, and all nanowires actively contribute to the capacity. Due to the nanostructure, the entire porous electrode has a very large specific surface area and thus has excellent ion conduction. The nanowire silicon material can achieve a theoretical capacity of almost 4200 mAh g−1 for the first time at C/20 rate. Although the diameter of nanowires increased from 89 to 141 nm after cycling process, the overall structure remained intact. The growth of Si is controlled by the catalysts. The stainless steel can also act as catalysts for the Si film formation. However, the formation of Si layers on the current collector can cause severe stress between the Si layer and the collector. The growth of Si can be interfered at a certain step by controlling the active seeds. For example, the chemically stable graphene or metal Ge surface with Au or Sn nanoparticles can serve as seeds for Si NWs growth [78, 79].

Atomic Layer Deposition

The atomic layer deposition (ALD) method is a vapor-phase, self-limiting, and layer by layer deposition, which is similar to the CVD. This method can produce nanoscale and controllable thin films in an atomic layer-by-layer deposition. Therefore, the process should consist of at least two different precursor gases, which can react with each other [80]. During the ALD process, the first gas is introduced into the pipe furnace and reacts with the substrate to form a coating layer with active groups. After the first gas is fully emitted, the second gas is introduced to react with the first layer (Fig. 5a) [81]. By repeating this process, different coating layers can be achieved. The coating film by ALD is mainly influenced by the substrate, gases precursors, temperature, etc. Compared with traditional thin-film deposition method, ALD can precisely control the coating thickness across the substrate by chemical reactions, and the coating layers are not only pinhole-free, dense, and uniform but also conformal even when deposited on complex 3D structures. These features of ALD present it as a great choice for nanotechnology and materials.

Fig. 5

a The ALD technique mechanism [81], and two examples for b surface coating [82] and c active materials fabrication [83]

ALD prepared electrodes generally have good electrochemical properties. TiO2 is the most investigated electrode materials (Fig. 5b, c) [84]. Recently, SnO2 [85], MoS2 [86], etc. are prepared and successfully used as active material for LIBs (Fig. 5c) [87, 88]. Because ALD is a vapor-phase synthesis method, it can coat a uniform layer with controllable thickness on the surface or inside the pores of materials. Kang and coworkers [83] demonstrated that nanoribbons as active materials in the electrodes allows the electrolyte to be immersed inside the material, thereby greatly increasing the diffusion rate of lithium ions. With the assistance of template, the hollow space of the nanoribbons can be synthesized by ALD with the tunnel size of nearly 100–200 nm in width and 20–50 nm in height. It allows the electrolyte to easily wet the hollow space. The rate performance of TiO2 nanoscale network has increased at least five times at 5 C compared to that of 100 nm-TiO2 nano-powder. Biener et al. coated porous electrode with TiO2 layers. It is found that the material with thinner coating layer shows better rate performance. When the TiO2 layer thickness increased from 2 to 7 and 20 nm, the capacity decreases from 227 to 214 and 157 mAh g−1, respectively [89].

The most general application of ALD in electrochemical storage is to protect the surface stability of electrodes to enhance the electrochemical performance [90]. The uniform Al2O3 coating on TiO2 nanotubes for LIBs is the most representative example of surface protection (Fig. 5a) [82]. The coating thickness of the Al2O3 layer onto the TiO2 nanotube can be controlled by ALD from 0.2, 1 to 10 nm according to the repeated cycles. The 1 nm coating Al2O3 layer can suppress the SEI formation and undesirable side reactions, which greatly improves the capacity. In addition, Al2O3 as an artificial layer can participate in the formation of SEI with Li–Al–O groups, which are great ionic conductor. Therefore, the Li-ion conductivity in improved and great rate performance can be achieved. Noked et al. demonstrated the 14 nm Al2O3 layer can effectively improve the stability of lithium metal interface by avoiding the reactions with electrolyte, cathode shuttles, etc. [91]. Comparing with the bare lithium metal anode, the ALD-protected anode can significantly improve cycling performance.

Electrical Methods


Electroplating is a versatile technique that functions to improve the surface properties of materials or to prepare nanoscale structures. The deposition mechanism is that in the case of an applied electric field, the ions move to the positive electrode and are reduced on the surface of the substrate to form a film. The thickness of film is controlled by the current density and time. Through post-treatment, the metal film can be oxidized to the corresponding metal oxide.

Template synthesis is the most popular method for preparing nanostructures of various materials using electroplating in LIBs. Chen, Xia, and coworkers obtained porous CoO semisphere arrays using the polystyrene as the template [92]. Yan, Tong, and coworkers demonstrated that CoO can coat on the surface of ZnO nanorod arrays by electroplating method. The ZnO template can be removed by treating the obtained electrode at KOH solution [93].

Electroplated surface layers also serves as a protective interfaces between the electrode and the electrolyte. Cu/TiO2 NT/Ti electrode can be prepared via electroplating Cu on TiO2 NT/Ti film. The prepared materials display a much higher discharge capacity, cycle stability, and Li+ diffusion coefficient than bare TiO2NT/Ti electrode [94]. Mulder et al. designed a 3D Ni honeycomb current collector for stable Li metal anode [95]. By controlling the porosity of Ni material with polyethylene glycol as an additive, the Li plating/stripping performance can prolong to 300 and 200 cycles at 0.5 mAh cm−2 and 1.0 mAh cm−2, respectively, at 1.0 mA cm−2.


Anodization is a well-established technique for modifying a layer on the metal surface. Generally, the metal surface can be thermal treated to form the corresponding oxide protective layer. However, this heating process often carries out at a high temperature, which changes the material structure and properties. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a low temperature method. Anodization refers to a technique in which a metal material is oxidized and precipitated in the electrolyte solution by applying an anode current at room temperature. Anodization is popular because of its controllable structure, economical, and large-area preparation.

Li et al. firstly reported the porous Fe3O4 thin film as anode material cycled about 100 cycles at the 0.1 C [96]. Subsequently, TiO2 [97], NiO [98], WO3 [99], CuCl nanoparticles [100], etc. were prepared and showed decent cyclic stability, good ion and electron conductivity, and enhanced capacity. The NiO@Ni foam can deliver a reversible capacity up to 705.5 mAh g−1 and 548.1 mAh g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1 and 2 A g−1, respectively.

Electrophoretic Deposition

Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) has been widely used as a surface coating and film preparation method. The deposition mechanism is that during the process, the charged particles with small sizes (need to disperse into the solution) in a suitable suspension migrate towards an electrode under an applied electric field (Fig. 6a, b). The morphology of the achieved film is significantly influenced by the electrolyte solution [104]. EPD has the advantages of low cost, simplicity, green, and controllable operation [105].

Fig. 6

a Schematic of process for fabrication of binder-free, carbon-free film electrodes [101]. b Schematic fabrication process for the Fe3O4/CNTs/rGO composite electrode [102]. c Schematic illustration of the synthesis route for rGO/active materials/Ni foam [103]

An electrode made by EPD shows better electrochemical performances than slurry-coated electrode. Robinson and coworkers proved that the Co3O4 nanoparticle films formed by EPD showed better adhesion and cycle performance than the electrode prepared by conventional methods (Fig. 6a). The EPD can provide a more effective mixed state between active materials and conductive additives [101]. It is worth noting that carbon nanotubes, graphene, and other carbon materials together with active materials can be deposited onto the current collector, which significantly improves the electron conductivity [106, 107]. Besides, the porous structure formed during the EPD process is crucial to accommodate the volume change during lithium-ion insertion and extraction. Zhao and coworkers demonstrated that the Si nanoparticle electrode prepared through EPD shows better electrochemical performance (Fig. 6b) [102, 108].

EPD is able to deposit surface layers composed of either active or inert materials. These layers serve as protective interfaces between the electrode and the electrolyte. For example, the reduced graphene oxide thin film deposited onto the surface of the electrode to improve the electrical conductivity and to buffer the volume changes during charge/discharge processes (Fig. 6c) [103].

Physical Methods


Electrospinning is a simple and popular technique to synthesize 1D nanostructures with fiber diameters ranged from tens of nanometers up to micrometers [109]. This preparation is difficult to achieve by the approaches mentioned above. This technique can produce polymers, organic, and inorganic composites with dense, hollow, or porous structures [110], from polymer solutions based on electrostatic forces [111]. An electrospinning unit generally consists of a syringe and a needle, a grounded collector, and a high-voltage supply, as shown in Fig. 7a, b [117]. During the electrospinning process, polymer solutions are loaded in the syringe and move into the needle to form a droplet. When a high voltage is applied between the needle and the collector, the electrostatic force at the surface of droplet would drive it to elongate to form a fiber. Finally, the solid polymer fibers would deposit onto the collector.

Fig. 7

The schemes of a single axial and b coaxial electrospinning [111, 112]. c Inorganic fibers [113]. d Inorganic particles encapsulated carbon fibers [114]. e The modification of carbon fibers [115]. f Carbon fiber membrane with nanoparticles [38]. g Highly flexible carbon fiber membrane [116]

The polymer solutions and needle are the key points for the success of fiber fabrication. Polymer solution should reach the minimum viscosity for the formation of homogeneous fiber structure. The solvent of polymer should have a lower evaporation rate, which allows the polymer solidification after leaving the needle. The needle should be designed with coaxial structure to achieve hollow or core-shell fiber structure (Fig. 7b). For the coaxial electrospinning, the core and shell solutions should be adjusted to be immiscible or non-precipitable. Besides, during the electrospinning process, solution flow rates, voltage, temperature, distance from needle to the collector, and diameter of the needle have a huge influence on the fiber structure.

The obtained electrospun membrane needs further treatment to be a binder-free electrode. Carbon, ceramic, or metal nanofibers can be synthesized from the carbonization of electrospun fibers that contain polymer, metal salts, or metal atoms, respectively. Their composites such as metal/C and ceramic/C can be also obtained from their corresponding mixed precursors followed by a one-step or multi-step heat treatment. A wide range of electrospun materials have been investigated for LIBs including metal oxides (e.g., TiO2, Fe2O3, ZnO, NiO, CuO, LiCoO3, Li4Ti5O12, and LiMn2O4) [118, 119], hybrids [120] (e.g., SnOx/C, SiOx/C, Co3O4/C, SnOx/C, TiO2/C) [113, 121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130], and polymers (e.g., polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), PAN and PVP, poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP), and polyethylene oxide (PEO)) [131].

Conventional electrospinning generally disperses metal salts and nanoparticles inside the fibers. However, the nanoparticles can adhere to the outside of the fibers as well (Fig. 7c). Lan, Yang, and coworker prepared 3D free-standing spider-web-like membranes with high mass loading of bismuth (Bi) nanoparticle clusters followed by carbonization in nitrogen gas [132]. The 3D Bi/C membrane provides good mechanical properties and stabilizes the Bi nanoparticles up to 200 cycles.

The architecture of fibers can be optimized to accommodate large volume changes and instability of the electrode materials during cycling process. The adjustment of the fiber structure can be started from either inside or outside of the fiber. The internal fiber can be regulated by the polymer solution and post-treatment, while the external fiber structure is controlled by post-treatment. When the polymer solution contains etchable materials, a porous fiber structure can be prepared after carbonization and template etching (Fig. 7d). This porous materials is capable of accommodating higher sulfur and suppressing the polysulfides shuttle effects [114]. The polymer can individually form an active material at the expense of flexibility self-standing property. This disadvantage can be addressed by additives. Liu et al. showed the PAN fibers with an appropriate amount of CNTs can still be self-standing after sulfurization [115]. The sulfur only exists in the form of Li2S2 and Li2S3 rather than polysulfides in the sulfurized PAN. Therefore, it shows ultra-stable cycling performance up to 1000 cycles (Fig. 7e).

Alternatively, the post-treatment of the surface of electrospun fibers is another way to prepare the high-performance binder-free electrode (Fig. 7f). After carbonization, the three-dimensional conductive network is formed to provide good electronic conductivity. The fiber surface also provides a large number of sites for the growth of active materials with easy access to electrolyte [38]. Another post-treatment is to coat the nanofibers with a protective surface layer. Generally, the nanoparticles spinning out with the polymer solution is inevitably exposed at the surface of the fiber. This part of the material may fall off from fibers during the cycling process, so the surface coating is equivalent to the protection of the fiber [133].

In addition to polymer solution, the needle is also of importance to the fibers design. The core-shell composite nanofiber can be prepared by a dual nozzle coaxial electrospinning setup (Fig. 7g) [116]. This needle can achieve a great core-shell fiber structure. Besides, hollow fibers can be prepared by designing the inner and outer solutions. When the hollow fiber is filled with the active material, there is sufficient space to allow the volume to expand [112].

Vacuum Filtration

The vacuum filtration method is a rapid manufacturing process to assemble different kinds of nanoscale materials into the macroscopic film for various applications. This process is low-cost, rapid, and efficient, which demonstrates a promising strategy for various functional films. 2D materials can be easily assembled into flexible self-standing paper-like materials, which can be directly used as flexible binder-free electrodes in energy storage devices [134, 135]. In general, the active materials are randomly dispersed between the supporting materials. Therefore, high mechanical strength and flexibility are preserved for the papers (Fig. 8) [136, 137].

Fig. 8

The scheme of vacuum filtration process [136]

The vacuum filtration features as the following strengths. Firstly, active materials can adhere on the conductive substrate, leading to the improvement of electron conductivity. For example, the electron conductivity of MoS2 can be largely improved; therefore, better rate performance can be obtained [138, 139]. Secondly, the large surface area is in favor of the contact between active materials and lithium ions, which facilitates the transportation of Li-ion. When the active material is added into the 2D material, the interlayer spacing becomes large; thus, the electrolyte can be immersed. The lithium ions are more accessible to the material; thereby, the interface impedance of material is reduced [140]. Thirdly, the effective material utilization is also facilitated by hindering the aggregation of 2D materials [141,142,143]. Lastly, the material agglomerations and electrode instabilities result from the huge volume change of active materials during Li insertion/extraction [144, 145]. Supporting sheets can absorb stress induced by volume expansion, similar to the role of elastic buffer [146, 147].

Different types of nanostructures can be assembled into 2D materials. For example, the nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanosheets, nanorods, etc. can fabricate into the graphene sheets [148]. When CNTs as additive are assembled into the nanosheets, the restacking of the nanosheets can be prevented, and the conductivity of ion and electron can be greatly increased [149]. The electrode chemical properties can be enhanced by coating or mixing active materials on other conductive materials and then assembling into 3D functional materials [150,151,152]. It is mainly attributed to the synergistic effects that 3D structure not only serves as a flexible scaffold for strains/stresses release and volume expansion, but also offers a three-dimensional conductive architecture with open channels for electron transfer and Li-ion diffusion. Besides, pre-protection of active materials is a way to improve material stability. The surface modified anode materials in graphene exhibit high capacities, long cycle-life, and excellent rate performance [153]. The Mn2P2O7-carbon in graphene electrode delivers a capacity of 585 mA h g−1 at a current density of 1000 mA g−1. When increasing the current density to 5000 mA g−1, a high capacity of 400 mA h g−1 can be remained even after 2000 cycles [153].

Physical Vapor Deposition

At certain temperature and airflow rate, the elemental vapor can be easily deposited onto the porous supporting materials [154,155,156]. Solid sulfur and red P nanoparticles are the typical materials, which can be deposited into porous carbon materials. The commercialization of sulfur as cathode materials is blocked by several intrinsic problems, including low electronic/ionic conductivity, large volumetric expansion, and shuttle effect of intermediate polysulfides (Li2Sx (4 ≤ x ≤ 8)). Particularly, the shuttle effect of polysulfides results in transport of sulfur from cathode to anode and the reaction with Li metal, which leads to significant capacity loss and safety issues. So far, the design of porous structure is the basic strategy to suppress the polysulfides shuttle effect, and sulfur vapor deposition is an effective way for the fabrication of S/C composite. It is an environmentally friendly, solvent-free method in which the sulfur powder undergoes a physical deposition process with no changes of chemical properties [157]. With proper absorbent in the structure, the shuttle effect of polysulfides can also be fixed. Recently, Yang, Zhang, and coworkers reported Ti3C2Tx paper is a good host for sulfur deposition (Fig. 9a). This Ti3C2Tx paper shows no cracks after 25 convexly and concavely bending cycles (Fig. 9b, c) [158]. Yu and coworkers [159] demonstrated porous carbon fibers encapsulated with red P shows high capacity of 2030 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C rate after 100 cycles. It is worth noting that physical vapor deposition (PVD) is only one of the procedures of immobilizing S or P onto carbon materials. Therefore, the most important research direction is how to design a porous conductive matrix.

Fig. 9

a The scheme of fabrication of robust, freestanding, and conductive Ti3C2Tx/S paper. Photographs of freestanding Ti3C2Tx/S paper when bending b convexly and c concavely, showing good mechanical flexibility similar to that of the pure Ti3C2Tx paper [158]

Application in Flexible Batteries

Flexible devices, such as wearable displays, sensors, sportswear, mobile communication devices, rollup displays, and so on, are one of the important directions for intelligent and smart world [160]. The development of these new devices requires the power of a flexible battery system [161,162,163]. However, current advanced pouch and 18,650 cells cannot be used on flexible devices due to the rigid material properties. Each component of the flexible battery, such as electrodes, separator, and solid electrolyte, must be flexible (Fig. 10a) [164]. The conventional electrode is generally adhered to the metal foil by a coating method to physically bond the active material and the conductive agent. During repeated bending and folding, the active material separates from the current collector, ending up with deactivation. For example, the Li4Ti5O12 (LTO)-based electrode folded about 100 cycles would present the detachment of LTO from Al foil. The impedance of the electrode increases from the first fold, and the higher the active material loading, the faster the impedance increases (Fig. 10b). At the same time, the pouch cell bending 30° results in serious capacity fade (Fig. 10c).

Fig. 10

a Assembly and bending tests of flexible batteries with flexible electrodes [164]. b Electrical resistance change with folding cycles [165]. c Capacity retention of folded cells at different angles at 1 C [165]

There are many strategies to fabricate flexible electrodes. Song et al. reported that coating LTO particles and Ag nano wires onto the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) web can greatly improve the electrode flexibility and stability. The electrical resistance of Ag@LTO@PET electrode does not change during 1000 folding cycles (Fig. 10b). Pouch-type Ag@LTO@PET-based half cells showed great cycling performance with little capacity decay when the electrode was bent at any angle (Fig. 11c) [165]. The most mature method is to fix the active material on a flexible substrate. As described in the “Introduction” section, the direct growth of the active material on the conductive substrate can improve battery energy density and rate performance. Herein, we take the carbon cloth and carbon materials as the example to show the application of binder-free electrodes in flexible devices.

Fig. 11

a Schematic illustration for the structural features of the flexible SnO2 nanosheets on flexible carbon cloth electrode during the folding (I), the rolling (II), and twisting (III) tests. b Current-time curves of the composite samples at various bending angles of the 1st and 200th cycles, and the inset images show the corresponding bending angles for measurement and photographs [166]

Most carbon materials cannot be used in flexible electronics. For example, a binder-free electrode based on graphite paper can only maintain 25 cycles in a bent state [167]. Comparing with other carbon materials, carbon cloth with excellent flexibility and electrical conductivity is one of the most promising materials for the flexible battery application. Even after the surface modification of inorganic materials, carbon cloth still shows excellent flexibility. As shown in Fig. 11a, there are no apparent changes of the electrode after bending, rolling, twisting, folding, and crumpling tests. After the mechanical test, the active materials on the carbon cloth can maintain structural integrity. Also, after 200 bending cycles, the current value slightly decreases from 17.3 to 16.8 mA, which demonstrates great stability (Fig. 11b) [166].

It is particularly difficult to synthesize flexible carbon materials. For example, the PAN film becomes much more brittle and fracture after carbonization, which is difficult to use in flexible batteries. The ideal carbon material, like the clothes we wear, bending and folding many times can still remain intact. The flexibility of the material can be greatly improved through reasonable design such as the addition of functional additives. Wang et al. reported that the carbonized PAN film with SiO2 filler can fully recover to its original state after repeated rolling or folding process [114]. When assembled into the pouch cell, it can withstand at different bending angles up to 180°. Yu et al. demonstrated that Zn(CH3COO)2 assists the uniform carbonization of PAN, which relieved the stress concentration [130]. The film obtained by this method can return to the initial state after folding four times (Fig. 12a). When assembled into the pouch cell, it can light the LED at any folding angle. When the pouch cell is disassembled, the binder-free electrode remains intact while the slurry-based electrode is completely destroyed (Fig. 12b–e).

Fig. 12

a Digital photographs of Zn(CH3COO)2-PAN film, which can be folded four times. LED lighting tests of a full battery when b flat, c folded once, and d folded twice; and e digital photographs of the electrode after the LED lighting test [130]


In conclusion, recent research progress on the preparation of binder-free electrodes for LIBs has been summarized. The fabrication methods focus on the chemical, physical, and electrical treatment, such as thermal treatment, hydrothermal treatment, CBD, ALD, CVD; vacuum filtration, electrospinning; and electrophoretic deposition, anodization, electrodeposition. Thermal treatment is the most commonly used chemical method to carbonize polymer for free-standing structure or decompose of the precursor of metallic oxide. The hydrothermal and CBD methods are very attractive due to accurate control of the size and morphology of nanomaterials. CBD and hydrothermal methods present in situ growth of active materials on the substrate through a chemical reaction. CVD is defined as the deposition of a gas carrier on a heated surface by a chemical reaction, while the ALD technique is a vapor phase chemical deposition process that is capable of producing high-quality nanoscale thin films in an atomic layer-by-layer manner. The vacuum filtration and electrospinning are the representative physical methods. The former is a physical manufacturing process to assemble different materials like nanoplatelets and nanoparticles into the macroscopic film. The latter can produce 1D nanoscale materials with fiber diameters ranged from tens of nanometers up to micrometers. The electrical method is a widely used technique to make coatings and thin films. However, it is not often used to prepare binder-free electrode. Among these methods, CVD and CBD are excellent ways to prepare silicon-based and sulfur-based materials, respectively.

The binder-free electrode shows better electrochemical performances than the traditional slurry system. The binder-free electrode can improve ionic and electronic transportation, cycling performance, and energy density of the electrodes. In addition, nanoscale materials are uniformly anchored on the supporting materials, which can effectively prevent the agglomeration of nanoparticles and mitigate the volumetric expansion during the repeated cycling process.

The conductive matrix plays a crucial role in the electrochemical properties and performances of the binder-free electrode. The ultra-flexible film has great potential to make a big breakthrough in the field of wearable and flexible devices. However, existing substrates are still unable to meet the requirements. The flexible device requires the binder-free electrode to bend and fold for numerous times with no damage and no separation from the substrate. According to current research process, ultra-flexible and ultra-stable carbon materials become the most promising candidate for next-generation flexible binder-free electrode.

Despite the difficulties, the future is expected. The uniform and large-scale growth of the active material on the conductive substrate is one of the necessary conditions for practical application. Fortunately, it is now possible to achieve. Practical applications need to consider the basic properties of the electrode in the battery, such as the initial Coulombic efficiency and voltage profiles. Therefore, the active materials for both anodes and cathodes should be carefully selected. For example, Si, Sn, or carbon materials serve as promising candidates for anode materials while the cathode materials may be selected from S matching with Li metal, or the existing Li metal oxides. In addition, flexible batteries can be achieved with all of flexible components, such as electrodes, separators, and electrolytes. Although these aspects have been studied for a long time, breakthrough is needed to facilitate the research progress.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available without restriction.



Lithium-ion batteries


Polyvinylidene fluoride


Active carbon fiber




Reduced graphene oxide






Graphene oxide


Poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride)


Carbon nanotube


Chemical bath deposition


Chemical vapor deposition


Solid electrolyte interface

Si NWs:

Silicon nanowires


Atomic layer deposition


Electrophoretic deposition


Polyvinyl alcohol


Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)


Polyethylene oxide




Physical vapor deposition




Polyethylene terephthalate


  1. 1.

    Tang W et al (2013) Aqueous rechargeable lithium batteries as an energy storage system of superfast charging. Energy Environ Sci 6:2093–2104

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhang QB et al (2015) Facile general strategy toward hierarchical mesoporous transition metal oxides arrays on three-dimensional macroporous foam with superior lithium storage properties. Nano Energy 13:77–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goodenough JB, Kim Y (2010) Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater 22:587–603

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bruce PG, Scrosati B, Tarascon JM (2008) Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:2930–2946

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chou SL, Pan Y, Wang JZ, Liu HK, Dou SX (2014) Small things make a big difference: binder effects on the performance of Li and Na batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:20347–20359

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Choi NS et al (2015) Recent progress on polymeric binders for silicon anodes in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Sci Technol 6:35–49

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Higgins TM, Coleman JN (2015) Avoiding resistance limitations in high-performance transparent supercapacitor electrodes based on large-area, high-conductivity PEDOT: PSS films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:16495–16506

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pan J et al (2016) PAA/PEDOT: PSS as a multifunctional, water-soluble binder to improve the capacity and stability of lithium-sulfur batteries. RSC Adv 6:40650–40655

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vicente N et al (2015) LiFePO4 particle conductive composite strategies for improving cathode rate capability. Electrochim Acta 163:323–329

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kim JM et al (2014) Conducting polymer-skinned electroactive materials of lithium-ion batteries: ready for monocomponent electrodes without additional binders and conductive agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:12789–12797

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ai G et al (2015) Fabrication of wheat grain textured TiO2/CuO composite nanofibers for enhanced solar H2 generation and degradation performance. Nano Energy 16:28–37

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ellis BL, Knauth P, Djenizian T (2014) Three-dimensional self-supported metal oxides for advanced energy storage. Adv Mater 26:3368–3397

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liu JH (2011) Sandwich-like, stacked ultrathin titanate nanosheets for ultrafast lithium storage. Adv Mater 23:998–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Reddy MV, Subba Rao GV, Chowdari BVR (2013) Metal oxides and oxysalts as anode materials for Li ion batteries. Chem Rev 113:5364–5457

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cheng F, Li WC, Lu AH (2016) Interconnected nanoflake network derived from a natural resource for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:27843–27849

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gelinck GH et al (2004) Flexible active-matrix displays and shift registers based on solution-processed organic transistors. Nat Mater 3:106–110

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhou G, Li F, Cheng HM (2014) Progress in flexible lithium batteries and future prospects. Energy Environ Sci 7:1307–1338

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang B et al (2013) Self-supported construction of uniform Fe3O4 hollow microspheres from nanoplate building blocks. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:4165–4168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen JS, Zhang Y, Lou XW (2011) One-pot synthesis of uniform Fe3O4 nanospheres with carbon matrix support for improved lithium storage capabilities. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:3276–3279

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang L et al (2012) Formation of Fe2O3 microboxes with hierarchical shell structures from Metal-organic frameworks and their lithium storage properties. J Am Chem Soc 134:17388–17391

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li X et al (2013) Three-dimensional network structured α-Fe2O3 made from a stainless steel plate as a high-performance electrode for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:6400–6406

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lu C et al (2014) A binder-free CNT network-MoS2 composite as a high performance anode material in lithium ion batteries. Chem Commun 50:3338–3340

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li X et al (2012) Novel approach toward a binder-free and current collector-free anode configuration: highly flexible nanoporous carbon nanotube electrodes with strong mechanical strength harvesting improved lithium storage. J Mater Chem 22:18847–18853

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Black R et al (2012) Screening for superoxide reactivity in Li-O2 batteries: effect on Li2O2/LiOH crystallization. J Am Chem Soc 134:2902–2905

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chen D et al (2018) Device configurations and future prospects of flexible/stretchable lithium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28:1805596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    He SJ, Chen W (2015) 3D graphene nanomaterials for binder-free supercapacitors: scientific design for enhanced performance. Nanoscale 7:6957–6990

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wu Z et al (2017) Etched current collector-guided creation of wrinkles in steel-mesh-supported V6O13 cathode for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:756–764

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kundu M et al (2014) Co(OH)2@MnO2 nanosheet arrays as hybrid binder-free electrodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 43:1257–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim YS et al Succinonitrile as a corrosion inhibitor of copper current collectors for overdischarge protection of lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:2039–2043

  30. 30.

    Wang X et al (2019) 3D heterogeneous Co3O4@Co3S4 nanoarrays grown on Ni foam as a binder-free electrode for lithium-ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 5:309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wu Z et al (2019) Carbon-nanomaterial-based flexible batteries for wearable electronics. Adv Mater 31:1800716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Campbell B et al (2015) Bio-derived, binderless, hierarchically porous carbon anodes for Li-ion batteries. Sci Rep 5:14575

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu B et al (2012) Hierarchical three-dimensional ZnCo2O4 nanowire arrays/carbon cloth anodes for a novel class of high-performance flexible lithium-ion batteries. Nano Lett 12:3005–3011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ding YH et al (2012) Direct synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles on an iron current collector as binder-free anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Mater Lett 81:105–107

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang C et al (2014) Hierarchical MoS2 nanosheet/active carbon fiber cloth as a binder-free and free-standing anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 6:5351–5358

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang CQ et al (2015) A binder-free Si-based anode for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 5:15940–15943

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Qiu H et al (2015) In situ synthesis of GeO2/reduced graphene oxide composite on Ni foam substrate as a binder-free anode for high-capacity lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:1619–1623

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Miao Y et al (2015) Electrospun porous carbon nanofiber@MoS2 core/sheath fiber membranes as highly flexible and binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 7:11093–11101

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li B et al (2015) From commercial sponge toward 3D graphene-silicon networks for superior lithium storage. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jo G et al (2012) Binder-free Ge nanoparticles-carbon hybrids for anode materials of advanced lithium batteries with high capacity and rate capability. Chem Commun 48:3987–3989

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chen T et al (2016) Binder-free lithium ion battery electrodes made of silicon and pyrolized lignin. RSC Adv 6:29308–29313

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang J et al (2015) Encapsulating micro-nano Si/SiOx into conjugated nitrogen-doped carbon as binder-free monolithic anodes for advanced lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 7:8023–8034

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li S et al (2016) Facilely scraping Si nanoparticles@reduced graphene oxide sheets onto nickel foam as binder-free electrodes for lithium ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 193:246–252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Xia F et al (2012) Layer-by-layer assembled MoO2-graphene thin film as a high-capacity and binder-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 4:4707–4711

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jiang Y et al (2014) Direct growth of mesoporous anatase TiO2 on nickel foam by soft template method as binder-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 4:48938–48942

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Park HY et al (2015) Simple approach to advanced binder-free nitrogen-doped graphene electrode for lithium batteries. RSC Adv 5:3881–3887

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen R et al (2016) Controlled synthesis of carbon nanofibers anchored with ZnxCo3-xO4 nanocubes as binder-free anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:2591–2599

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Xue L et al (2018) Self-standing porous LiCoO2 nanosheet arrays as 3D cathodes for flexible Li-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28:1705836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li W et al (2013) Single-crystalline metal germanate nanowire-carbon textiles as binder-free, self-supported anodes for high-performance lithium storage. Nanoscale 5:10291–10299

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cheng J et al (2014) Conformal coating of TiO2 nanorods on a 3-D CNT scaffold by using a CNT film as a nanoreactor: a free-standing and binder-free Li-ion anode. J Mater Chem A 2:2701–2707

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li D et al (2014) Carbon-wrapped Fe3O4 nanoparticle films grown on nickel foam as binder-free anodes for high-rate and long-life lithium storage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:648–654

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gu L et al (2016) Facile fabrication of binder-free NiO electrodes with high rate capacity for lithium-ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 368:298–302

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tian J et al (2013) PH-driven dissolution-precipitation: a novel route toward ultrathin Ni(OH)2 nanosheets array on nickel foam as binder-free anode for Li-ion batteries with ultrahigh capacity. CrystEngComm 15:8300–8305

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li Z et al (2015) 3D heterostructure Fe3O4/Ni/C nanoplate arrays on Ni foam as binder-free anode for high performance lithium-ion battery. Electrochimica Acta 182:398–405

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Deng J et al (2015) Interconnected MnO2 nanoflakes assembled on graphene foam as a binder-free and long-cycle life lithium battery anode. Carbon 92:177–184

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hu X et al (2015) Li-storage performance of binder-free and flexible iron fluoride@ graphene cathodes. J Mater Chem A 3:23930–23935

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wu X et al (2016) NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays grown on flexible nitrogen-doped carbon foams as three-dimensional binder-free integrated anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batterie. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:4505–4512

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Liu S et al (2015) Mesoporous NiCo2O4 nanoneedles grown on three dimensional graphene networks as binder-free electrode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta 176:1–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhu X et al (2014) Free-standing three-dimensional graphene/manganese oxide hybrids as binder-free electrode materials for energy storage applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces6:11665-11674

  60. 60.

    Zhang L et al (2016) Targeted synthesis of unique nickel sulfide (NiS, NiS2) microarchitectures and the applications for the enhanced water splitting system. Adv Mater Interfaces 3:1500467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kong W et al (2016) Binder-free polymer encapsulated sulfur-carbon nanotube composite cathodes for high performance lithium batteries. Carbon 96:1053–1059

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Qin J et al (2013) MnOx/SWCNT macro-films as flexible binder-free anodes for high-performance Li-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2:733–741

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lou F et al (2013) Facile synthesis of manganese oxide/aligned carbon nanotubes over aluminium foil as 3D binder free cathodes for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:3757–3767

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Botas C et al (2015) Sn-and SnO2-graphene flexible foams suitable as binder-free anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:13402–13410

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li G et al (2015) Interconnected mesoporous NiO sheets deposited onto TiO2 nanosheet arrays as binder-free anode materials with enhanced performance for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv 5:101247–101256

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zheng J, Zhang B (2014) Facile chemical bath deposition of Co3O4 nanowires on nickel foam directly as conductive agent-and binder-free anode for lithium ion batteries. Ceram Int 40:11377–11380

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Chen H et al (2015) 3D hierarchically porous zinc-nickel-cobalt oxide nanosheets grown on Ni foam as binder-free electrodes for electrochemical energy storage. J Mater Chem A 3:24022–24032

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Li W et al (2014) High-performance hollow sulfur nanostructured battery cathode through a scalable, room temperature, one-step, bottom-up approach. PNAS 110:7148–7153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zhou L et al (2014) Binder-free phenyl sulfonated graphene/sulfur electrodes with excellent cyclability for lithium sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:5117–5123

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Liu W et al (2015) In situ fabrication of three-dimensional, ultrathin graphite/carbon nanotube/NiO composite as binder-free electrode for high-performance energy storage. J Mater Chem A 3:624–633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sim D et al (2012) Direct growth of FeVO4 nanosheet arrays on stainless steel foil as high-performance binder-free Li ion battery anode. RSC Adv 2:3630–3633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wang W et al (2013) Binder-free three-dimensional silicon/carbon nanowire networks for high performance lithium-ion battery anodes. Nano Energy 2:943–950

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Huang ZX et al (2014) 3D graphene supported MoO2 for high performance binder-free lithium ion battery. Nanoscale 6:9839–9845

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Liang Z et al (2016) Composite lithium metal anode by melt infusion of lithium into a 3D conducting scaffold with lithiophilic coating. PNAS 113:2862–2867

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Zhao Y et al (2019) Silicon-based and -related materials for lithium-ion batteries. Prog Chem 31:613–630

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Zhao Y et al (2018) The application of self-assembled hierarchical structures in lithium-ion batteries. Prog Chem 30:1762–1770

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Chan CK et al (2008) High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nature Nanotechnol 3:31–35

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Xia F et al (2015) Graphene as an interfacial layer for improving cycling performance of Si nanowires in lithium-ion batteries. Nano Lett 15:6658–6664

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kennedy T et al (2015) Nanowire heterostructures comprising germanium stems and silicon branches as high-capacity Li-ion anodes with tunable rate capability. ACS Nano 9:7456–7465

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sundberg P, Karppinen M (2014) Organic and inorganic-organic thin film structures by molecular layer deposition: A review. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:1104–1136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Chen C et al (2013) Nanoporous nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide with excellent photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation produced by molecular layer deposition. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:9196–9200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Sopha H et al (2017) ALD Al2O3-coated TiO2 nanotube layers as anodes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Omega 2:2749–2756

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kim SW et al (2009) Fabrication and electrochemical characterization of TiO2 three-dimensional nanonetwork based on peptide assembly. ACS Nano 3:1085–1090

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Meng X, Yang XQ, Sun X (2012) Emerging applications of atomic layer deposition for lithium-ion battery studies. Adv Mater 24:3589–3615

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Li X et al (2012) Tin oxide with controlled morphology and crystallinity by atomic layer deposition onto graphene nanosheets for enhanced lithium storage. Adv Funct Mater 22:1647–1654

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Nandi DK et al (2014) Atomic layer deposited MoS2 as a carbon and binder free anode in Li-ion battery. Electrochimica Acta 146:706–713

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Meng XB, Yang XQ, Sun XL (2012) Emerging applications of atomic layer deposition for lithium-ion battery studies. Adv Mater 24:3589–3615

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Zhao Y, Zheng K, Sun X (2018) Addressing interfacial issues in liquid-based and solid-state batteries by atomic and molecular layer deposition. Joule 2:2583–2604

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Ye J et al (2015) Structural optimization of 3D porous electrodes for high-rate performance lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 9:2194–2202

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Jung YS et al (2013) Unexpected improved performance of ALD coated LiCoO2/graphite Li-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 3:213–219

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Kozen AC et al (2015) Next-generation lithium metal anode engineering via atomic layer deposition. ACS Nano 9:5884–5892

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Chen M et al (2016) Self-supported porous CoO semisphere arrays as binder-free electrodes for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Mater Res Bull 73:125–129

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Zhang W et al (2016) Self-supported hierarchical hollow-branch cobalt oxide nanorod arrays as binder-free electrodes for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Mater Lett 162:101–104

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Meng RJ et al (2016) High performance binder-free quaternary composite CuO/Cu/TiO2NT/Ti anode for lithium ion battery. Ceram Int 42:6039–6045

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Xu Y et al (2018) Honeycomb-like porous 3D nickel electrodeposition for stable Li and Na metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater 12:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Cheng H et al (2012) Rugated porous Fe3O4 thin films as stable binder-free anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem 22:22692–22698

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Cha G, Lee HJ, Choi J (2013) Preparation of binder-free thin film Li4Ti5O12 anode with an adjustable thickness through anodic TiO2 nanotubes. Curr Appl Phys 13:1788–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Yang W et al (2014) NiO nanorod array anchored Ni foam as a binder-free anode for high-rate lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:20022–20029

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Pervez SA et al (2015) Anodic WO3 mesosponge@ carbon: A novel binder-less electrode for advanced energy storage devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7635–7643

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Liu S et al (2016) Binder-free integration of insoluble cubic CuCl nanoparticles with a homologous Cu substrate for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv 6:3742–3747

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Ha DH, Islam MA, Robinson RD (2012) Binder-free and carbon-free nanoparticle batteries: a method for nanoparticle electrodes without polymeric binders or carbon black. Nano Lett 12:5122–5130

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Yang Y et al (2016) A facile electrophoretic deposition route to the Fe3O4/CNTs/rGO composite electrode as a binder-free anode for lithium ion battery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:26730–26739

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Yi Z et al (2015) A novel strategy to prepare Sb thin film sandwiched between the reduced graphene oxide and Ni foam as binder-free anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 190:804–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Yao M et al (2018) Electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanofibers/silicon film with honeycomb structure as integrated anode electrode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 281:312–322

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Cai G et al (2012) An efficient route to a porous NiO/reduced graphene oxide hybrid film with highly improved electrochromic properties. Nanoscale 4:5724–5730

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Guo DJ et al (2016) Copper nanoparticles spaced 3D graphene films for binder-free lithium-storing electrodes. J Mater Chem A 4:8466–8477

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Wang B et al (2015) Facile and large-scale fabrication of hierarchical ZnFe2O4/graphene hybrid films as advanced binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. New J Chem 39:1725–1733

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Yang Y et al (2015) Binder-free Si nanoparticle electrode with 3D porous structure prepared by electrophoretic deposition for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7497–7504

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Li X et al (2012) Preparation and characteristics of LaOCl nanotubes by coaxial electrospinning. Mater Lett 80:43–45

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Chen Y et al (2010) LaOCl nanofibers derived from electrospun PVA/Lanthanum chloride composite fibers. Mater Lett 64:6–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Joshi BN et al (2016) Flexible, freestanding, and binder-free SnOx-ZnO/carbon nanofiber composites for lithium ion battery anodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:9446–9453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Li Y et al (2014) Coaxial electrospun Si/C-C core-shell composite nanofibers as binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 258:67–73

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Dirican M et al (2015) Flexible binder-free silicon/silica/carbon nanofiber composites as anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 169:52–60

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Song X et al (2017) A high strength, free-standing cathodeconstructed by regulating graphitization and the pore structure in nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers for flexible lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:6832–6839

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wang X et al (2019) Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathodes with high compatibility in both ether and carbonate electrolytes for ultrastable lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 29:1902929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Zhu J et al (2019) Self-healing liquid metal nanoparticles encapsulated in hollow carbon fibers as a free-standing anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 62:883–889

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH (2001) Bending instability in electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Phys 90:4836–4846

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Sahay R et al (2012) High aspect ratio electrospun CuO nanofibers as anode material for lithium-ion batteries with superior cycleability. J Phys Chem C 116:18087–18092

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Cherian CT et al (2013) Morphologically robust NiFe2O4 nanofibersas high capacity Li-ion battery anode material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:9957–9963

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Zhang B et al (2012) Exceptional electrochemical performance offreestanding electrospun carbon nanofiber anodes containing ultrafine SnOx particles. Energy Environ Sci 5:9895–9902

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Tang X et al (2015) The positive influence of graphene on the mechanical and electrochemical properties of SnxSb-graphene-carbon porous mats as binder-free electrodes for Li+ storage. Electrochimica Acta 186:223–230

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Luo S et al (2012) Binder-free LiCoO2/carbon nanotube cathodes for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Adv Mater 24:2294–2298

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Wang J et al (2015) Facile fabrication of binder-free metallic tin nanoparticle/carbon nanofiber hybrid electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta 153:468–475

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Yan F et al (2015) Stannous ions reducing graphene oxide at room temperature to produce SnOx-porous, carbon-nanofiber flexible mats as binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:12672–12679

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Choi J et al (2013) Sol-gel nanoglues for an organic binder-free TiO2 nanofiber anode for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 5:3230–3234

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Favors Z et al (2015) Towards scalable binderless electrodes: carbon coated silicon nanofiber paper via Mg reduction of electrospun SiO2 nanofibers. Sci Rep 5:8246

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Lee S et al (2013) 3D cross-linked nanoweb architecture of binder-free TiO2 electrodes for lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:11525–11529

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Zhang M et al (2013) CoO-carbon nanofiber networks prepared by electrospinning as binder-free anode materials for lithium-ion batteries with enhanced properties. Nanoscale 5:12342–12349

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Zhang M et al (2014) Flexible CoO-graphene-carbon nanofiber mats as binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries with superior rate capacity and cyclic stability. J Mater Chem A 2:5890–5897

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Chen R et al (2017) Facile fabrication of foldable electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofibers for flexible lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:12914–12921

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Huang ZM et al (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Jin Y et al (2017) Bio-inspired spider-web-like membranes with a hierarchical structure for high performance lithium/sodium ion battery electrodes: the case of 3D freestanding and binder-free bismuth/CNF anodes. Nanoscale 9:13298–13304

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Wang M, Song W, Fan L (2015) Three-dimensional interconnected network of graphene-wrapped silicon/carbon nanofiber hybrids for binder-free anodes in lithium-ion batteries. Chem Electro Chem 2:1699–1706

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Sun H et al (2016) Binder-free graphene as an advanced anode for lithium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 4:6886–6895

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Abouimrane A et al (2010) Non-annealed graphene paper as a binder-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 114:12800–12804

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Zhang L, Fan W, Liu T (2015) A flexible free-standing defect-rich MoS2/graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid paper as a binder-free anode for high-performance lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv 5:43130–43140

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Zhang J et al (2013) Dimension-tailored functional graphene structures for energy conversion and storage. Nanoscale 5:3112–3126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Yang M et al (2015) Free-standing molybdenum disulfide/graphenecomposite paper as a binder-and carbon-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 288:76–81

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Li Y et al (2011) MoS2 nanoparticles grown on graphene: an advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Am ChemSoc 133:7296–7299

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Liu Y et al (2015) Binder-free layered Ti3C2/CNTs nanocomposite anodes with enhanced capacity and long-cycle life for lithium-ion atteries. Dalton Trans 44:7123–7126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Li H et al (2015) Reduced graphene oxide/boron nitride composite film as a novel binder-free anode for lithium ion batteries with enhanced performances. Electrochimica Acta 166:197–205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Hu Y et al (2013) Free-standing graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid apers used as current collector and binder free anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 237:41–46

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Park SK et al (2016) Porous Mn3O4 nanorod/reduced graphene oxide hybrid paper as a flexible and binder-free anode material for lithium ion battery. Energy 99:266–273

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Gao J, Lowe MA, Abruna HD (2011) Spongelike nanosized Mn3O4 as a high-capacity anode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. Chem Mater 23:3223–3227

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Liu Y et al (2014) Binder-free three-dimensional porous Mn3O4 nanorods/reduced graphene oxide paper-like electrodes for electrochemical energy storage. RSC Adv 4:16374–16379

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Wang R et al (2014) Heat-induced formation of porous and free-standing MoS2/GS hybrid electrodes for binder-free and ultralong-life lithium ion batteries. Nano Energy 8:183–195

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Liu Y et al (2013) Flexible CuO nanosheets/reduced-graphene oxide composite paper: binder-free anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:9850–9855

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Wang H et al (2015) Graphene/Co9S8 nanocomposite paper as a binder-free and free-standing anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:23677–23683

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Zhang W et al (2016) Ultra-long Na2V6O16·xH2O nanowires: large-scale synthesis and application in binder-free flexible cathodes for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv 6:5161–5168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Huang ZD et al (2016) Binder-free graphene/carbon nanotube/silicon hybrid grid as freestanding anode for high capacity lithium ion batteries. Compos. Part A Appl Sci Manuf 84:386–392

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Han K et al (2014) Flexible self-standing graphene-Se@ CNT composite film as a binder-free cathode for rechargeable Li-Se batteries. J Power Sources 263:85–89

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Zhang Z et al (2015) High-performance nickel manganese ferrite/oxidized graphene composites as flexible and binder-free anodes for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 5:40018–40025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Yang Y et al (2016) Bacteria absorption-based Mn2P2O7-carbon@ reduced graphene oxides for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. ACS Nano 10:5516–5524

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Elazari R et al (2011) Sulfur-impregnated activated carbon fiber cloth as a binder‐free cathode for rechargeable Li-S batteries. Adv Mater 23:5641–5644

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Fu K et al (2014) Bradford, X. Zhang, Sulfur gradient-distributed CNF composite: a self-inhibiting cathode for binder-free lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Commun 50:10277–10280

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Cui Y et al (2016) A binder-free sulfur/carbon composite electrode prepared by a sulfur sublimation method for Li-S batteries. RSC Adv 6:52642–52645

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Liu Y et al (2017) CNT-threaded N-doped porous carbon film as binder-free electrode for high-capacity supercapacitor and Li-S battery. J Mater Chem A 5:9775–9784

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Tang H et al (2019) A robust, freestanding MXene-sulfur conductive paper for long-lifetime Li-S batteries. Adv Funct Mater 29:1901907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Li W et al (2014) Crystalline red phosphorus incorporated with porous carbon nanofibers as flexible electrode for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 78:455–462

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Hu Y, Sun X (2014) Flexible rechargeable lithium ion batteries: advances and challenges in materials and process technologies. J Mater Chem A 2:10712–10738

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Qian G et al (2019) Designing flexible lithium-ion batteries by structural engineering. ACS Energy Lett 4:690–701

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Wu et al (2019) Carbon-nanomaterial-based flexible batteries for wearable electronics. Adv Mater 31:1800716

  163. 163.

    Yadav et al (2019) Facile development strategy of a single carbon-fiber-based all-solid-state flexible lithium-ion battery for wearable electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:7974-7980

  164. 164.

    Wang J et al (2017) Ultra-flexible lithium ion batteries fabricated by electrodeposition and solvothermal synthesis. Electrochimica Acta 237:119–126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Hwang C et al (2017) Foldable electrode architectures based on silver-nanowire-wound or carbon-nanotube-webbed micrometer-scale fibers of polyethylene terephthalate mats for flexible lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 29:1705445

    Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Min X et al (2019) A textile-based SnO2 ultra-flexible electrode for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater 16:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Kim SD, Rana K, Ahn JH (2016) Additive-free synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 nanowire arrays on freestanding ultrathin graphite as a hybrid anode for flexible lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:19197–19206

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


C. Deng thanks the Hoffmann Institute of Advanced Materials (HIAM), Shenzhen Polytechnic for the postdoctoral fellowship. T. Li is thankful for the NIU startup support.

Author information




Conceptualization—Y.Z., T.L., and Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., C.D., and Y.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y., Y.C., X.L., and Q.H. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Liang or Tao Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, Y., Deng, C., Chen, Y. et al. Binder-Free Electrodes and Their Application for Li-Ion Batteries. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 112 (2020).

Download citation


  • Lithium ion batteries
  • Binder-free electrode
  • Fabrication method
  • Flexible