Skip to main content

Co-dosing Ozone and Deionized Water as Oxidant Precursors of ZnO Thin Film Growth by Atomic Layer Deposition


Characteristics of atomic layer deposition (ALD)-grown ZnO thin films on sapphire substrates with and without three-pulsed ozone (O3) as oxidant precursor and post-deposition thermal annealing (TA) are investigated. Deposition temperature and thickness of ZnO epilayers are 180 °C and 85 nm, respectively. Post-deposition thermal annealing is conducted at 300 °C in the ambience of oxygen (O2) for 1 h. With strong oxidizing agent O3 and post-deposition TA in growing ZnO, intrinsic strain and stress are reduced to 0.49% and 2.22 GPa, respectively, with extremely low background electron concentration (9.4 × 1015 cm−3). This is originated from a lower density of thermally activated defects in the analyses of thermal quenching of the integrated intensity of photoluminescence (PL) spectra. TA further facilitates recrystallization forming more defect-free grains and then reduces strain and stress state causing a remarkable decrease of electron concentration and melioration of surface roughness.


Several oxidizing agents are used in the growth of ZnO. They include water (H2O), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), oxygen (O2), and ozone (O3) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. H2O is a commonly used oxidant in the growth of ZnO with atomic layer deposition (ALD). ALD is a layer-by-layer self-limiting growth mechanism. Specific surface ligands exchange reactions with sequential pulsing of respective precursors. Surface reactions stop and saturate when the reactive sites of the surface are completely depleted. ALD growth of thin films has advantages such as superior conformal deposition on surfaces and side regions, excellent step coverages of edges, high uniformity over a large area, precision in layer thickness control, and suitable for low deposition temperature [7,8,9].

Strong oxidizing agents influence not only the material structures but optoelectrical characteristics of ALD-deposited ZnO. H2O2 oxidant provides more oxygen-rich conditions than commonly used H2O precursor to passivate defects oxygen vacancies (VO) and zinc interstitials (Zni) in ALD-grown ZnO films at low growth temperatures from 80 to 150 °C. Columnar surface morphologies with (002) preferential orientation of growth plane occurred when the use of oxidant is altered from H2O to H2O2 [2]. H2O2 oxidant increases the growth rates by approximately 70% as compared with using O3 gas reactant of ALD-grown ZnO at 200 °C. Rise of hydroxyl (OH) group density on the growing surface of the films is responsible for the increase of growth rates [3]. The increase of growth rate of ZnO about 60% for using pure O2 instead of H2O as an oxidizer is reported, too [4].

O3 is an effective oxidizer in ALD-grown oxide materials. The high electrochemical potential of O3 gives rise to fast reaction rates at a low growth temperature. O3 is more volatile than H2O, H2O2, and O2, and it is easier to purge. Therefore, purge times in each cycle can be shortened. The absence of hydrogen in O3 molecule leads to less hydrogen and hydroxyl contamination in the growth. Less uniform in thickness due to recombinative surface loss of ZnO is shown for 10 s of O3 exposure times when the growth is at 200 °C [5]. ALD-prepared undoped ZnO films with O3 oxidizing agents show a double thermoelectric power factor compared to samples with H2O oxidizer. H2O- and O3-grown ZnO films have the same defect levels of VO but different Zn-related defect levels. Sufficient oxidation power of the O3 results in a lower content of native Zni and hence a larger thermoelectric power factor. Strong oxidant effect of O3 elevates the thermoelectric performance of undoped ZnO films [6]. Co-dosing O3 and H2O could improve the uniformity and conformality of ZnO thin film for proper ALD processes [5].

Intrinsic and extrinsic strains exist in ZnO film grown on a sapphire substrate naturally. Intrinsic strain is originated from high-density crystallographic imperfections in ZnO. Crystallographic imperfections include hydrogen complexes, zinc interstitials (Zni), oxygen vacancies (VO), threading dislocations (TDs), and grain boundaries (GBs) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Extrinsic strain is generated from a large mismatch of lattice constants and thermal expansion coefficients between ZnO epilayer and sapphire substrate. Various manners are exerted to diminish the intrinsic and extrinsic strain of ZnO materials on sapphires. Thin MgO buffer layer can diminish extrinsic strain, reduce surface roughness by 58.8%, and suppress surface cracks of ZnO thin film on sapphire [22]. Extrinsic strain of ZnO on sapphire is fully relaxed with the thickness reaching 30 nm prepared by magnetron sputter deposition at 550 °C [23]. Relaxation of compressive stress from 1.77 to 1.47 GPa of ZnO films deposited by spray pyrolysis method with the rise of glass substrate temperatures from 350 to 450 °C is exhibited [24].

ALD ZnO grown at 180 °C with one-pulsed precursors (DEZn and H2O) shows background electron concentration as high as ~ 1018 cm−3 even with post-deposition TA [25]. Commonly used one-pulsed H2O precursors of ALD processes do not generate ideal monolayer of oxygen atoms. Three-pulsed precursors (DEZn and H2O) could generate multiple hits or collisions of precursor molecules with surface ligand to promote the reaction probability for the ALD ZnO grown at low temperature 100 °C. The choice of “three” pulses helps securing of reactants locating the open chemisorption or reaction site properly. Extremely low background electron concentration 8.4 × 1014 cm−3, high electron drift mobility 62.1 cm2/Vs, and pronounced enhancement of near bandgap edge (NBE) photoluminescence (PL) of three-pulsed precursors ZnO with suitable buffer layer and RTA conditions are acquired [26]. Several reports show enhancement of material quality of ZnO thin films and ZnO/ZnMgO multiple quantum wells with thermal annealing [27, 28]. In this report, three-pulsed O3 and subsequent one-pulsed H2O as oxidizers per ALD cycle are used to grow ZnO thin films at 180 °C. Post-deposition thermal annealing (TA) is applied to improve crystalline quality of the samples. Material micro- and nano-structural, photoluminescence, and Hall effect features of ALD-grown ZnO thin films are explored.

Experimental Methods

ZnO epilayers are deposited on conventional c-face sapphire (c-Al2O3) substrates by Cambridge NanoTech Savannah 100 ALD system. In the growth of ALD ZnO thin films, precursors including deionized (DI) H2O, O3, and diethyl zinc (DEZn, Zn(C2H5)2) are utilized. Table 1 demonstrates conditions of pulse number of O3 and post-deposition TA of three specimens named A, B, and C. A schematic diagram of pulse sequence with time per ALD cycle of samples is displayed in Fig. 1. In this figure, one ALD cycle contains six sequential steps. The first step is the injection of one-pulsed deionized (DI) H2O into a meter-scale reactor to make hydroxyl (OH)-terminated surface on sapphire or to react with the dangling ethyl groups (C2H5) forming zinc-oxygen (Zn–O) bridges on Zn surface with hydroxyl surface groups. One atomic layer of oxygen (O) is produced. The second step is the purge of high purity nitrogen gas (N2) to remove excess precursor molecules and volatile byproducts and to prevent mixing of subsequent precursors after each exposure of reactants. The third step is the injection of three-pulsed O3 into reactors to facilitate the reduction of native defects. The fourth step is the purge of the chamber by N2 gas. The fifth step is the injection of one-pulsed DEZn into reactors to produce one atomic layer of zinc (Zn) upon the oxygen layer. The final step is also the purge of the chamber by N2 gas. Precursors pulsed into the reaction chamber through carry gas N2 with a chamber pressure of 4 × 10−1 Torr. The optimal condition of exposure time for the reactants DI H2O, O3, and DEZn is 0.01, 0.5, and 0.015 s, respectively. The pulse time of the evacuation of the chamber is 5 s. The thickness of ZnO thin films is 85 nm with 500 ALD cycles of each sample. Other favorable conditions of deposition parameters are shown in the previous reports [29]. Post-deposition TA at 300 °C in the ambience of O2 for 1 h in a furnace is processed on sample C.

Table 1 Pulse number of ozone, thermal annealing, strain, and stress of specimens
Fig. 1

ALD-grown ZnO films on sapphire substrates with pulse sequence H2O/N2/O3/N2/DEZn/N2 using DI water, O3, and Zn(C2H5)2 as the precursors

Material structural, optical, and electrical properties of samples are conducted by the following measurements. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns are measured with diffraction angle (2θ) range from 33 to 38° and wavelength 0.154 nm of copper Kα radiation by using the instrument D2 phaser (Bruker Corporation). Hall effect measurement uses Ecopia HMS-3000 system, and specimens are cut into squares having a size area of 0.7 × 0.7 cm2. Four corners of the specimens are soldered by small indium blobs showing ohmic contacts in van der Pauw configuration. Sheet carrier density, mobility, and resistivity of the films are measured. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra are carried out from 10 to 300 K with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm and a power of 55 mW of He–Cd laser. Thermal quenching of integrated intensity of PL spectra with the increase of temperature is analyzed. Surface texture and roughness of specimens examined from high-resolution images of atomic force microscope (AFM) are taken by the instrument of Veeco Dimension 3100.

Results and Discussion

Figure 2 demonstrates the crystalline nature of the specimens by the measurements of XRD patterns. Two Bragg diffraction peaks (002) and (101) correspond to the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO. The strongest peak intensity of XRD patterns is normalized for comparison of peak intensity among samples. Two green arrows indicated on the top horizontal axis show diffraction angles 34.4° and 36.2° of (002) and (101), respectively, of strain-free bulk ZnO acquired from the material data sets released by the organization of Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS). In the figure, one can observe the (002) and (101) peaks in sample B and C approach and further approach diffraction angles of (002) and (101) of strain-free bulk ZnO.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of ZnO films with crystalline orientations along (002) and (101) directions of the specimens. The arrows indicate the diffraction angles 34.4° and 36.2° of (002) and (101) of bulk ZnO, respectively

Biaxial strain along the c-axis of the epitaxial layers can be obtained through the shift of XRD patterns along (002) in contrast with strain-free bulk ZnO. Average strain (εz) in the lattice of ZnO films is estimated from the lattice parameters using the following expression.

$$ {\varepsilon}_z=\frac{c-{c}_0}{c_0}\times 100\% $$

where c and c0 are the lattice constants along the c-axis calculated from Bragg’s diffraction angles of (002) peaks of ZnO films and bulk. The average stress (σ) in the plane of the films can be calculated using the biaxial strain model:

\( \sigma =\frac{2{c}_{13}^2-{c}_{33}\left({c}_{11}+{c}_{12}\right)}{c_{13}}\times {\varepsilon}_z=-453.6\times {\varepsilon}_z\left(\mathrm{GPa}\right) \)   (2)where c11 = 209.7 GPa, c12 = 121.1 GPa, c13 = 105.1 GPa, and c33 = 210.9 GPa are the elastic stiffness constants of bulk ZnO. In Table 1, the strains/stresses (εz/σ) of A, B, and C samples are 1.08%/4.90 GPa, 0.74%/3.37 GPa, and 0.49%/2.22 GPa, respectively. Strain/stress is reduced and further reduced in samples B and C.

PL spectra at various temperatures from 10 to 300 K of samples are displayed in Fig. 3. Strong near band edge radiative recombination of excitons with spectral peak energy around 3.34 eV is dominant in PL spectra of all samples. Longitudinal-optical (LO) phonon-assisted optical emission is observed at the lower energy shoulder of the PL spectra of samples. In Fig. 4a–c, it exhibits the Arrhenius plot of integrated intensity of PL spectra versus the inverse of temperature. Thermal quenching of integrated intensity of PL with increasing temperature can be fitted by the following Arrhenius formula.

$$ I(T)=\frac{A}{1+{D}_{nr1}\exp \left(\frac{-{E}_{A1}}{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}\right)+{D}_{nr2}\exp \left(\frac{-{E}_{A2}}{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}\right)} $$

where I(T) represents the integrated PL intensity. A is a constant. Dnr1 and Dnr2 are constants related to the density of non-radiative recombination centers. EA1 and EA2 are the activation energies corresponding to the non-radiative recombination process of donor bound excitons at low temperature and free excitons at high temperature, respectively. kB is the Boltzmann constant. Least squares method in regression analysis is utilized to fit the data showing the parameters of Dnr1, Dnr2, EA1, and EA2 with red fitting curves in Table 2 and Fig. 4a–c. The fitting result shows that variations of Dnr1, EA1, and EA2 among samples are light. Dnr2 are 132.7, 153.6, and 110.8 of samples A, B, and C, respectively, showing a large difference in the amount of defect density. The smallest value of Dnr2 suggests the lowest density of thermally activated defects in sample C.

Fig. 3

ac Temperature-dependent PL spectra of specimens

Fig. 4

ac Arrhenius plots of thermal quenching of integrated intensity of PL spectra and red fitting curves of samples

Table 2 Carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of Hall effect measurements and root mean square (rms) surface roughness estimated by AFM images of specimens

Background electron concentration, mobility, and resistivity of Hall effect measurements of samples are listed in Table 2. In sample B, two orders of magnitude decrease of carrier concentration with reduction of mobility are shown as compared with sample A. Further immense decrease of carrier concentration to the lowest value of 9.4 × 1015 cm−3 and the rise of mobility to a value 6.1 cm2/Vs are observed in sample C as compared with sample B. The least amount of electron concentration is due to the largest relaxation of strain/stress states and remarkable reduction of native defect density in sample C.

Figures 5a–c and d–f are 2D and 3D AFM images of specimens. Root mean square (RMS) roughness of A, B, and C is 1.92, 4.30, and 2.18 nm, respectively, as shown in Table 2. The lowest surface texture roughness occurred in sample A. With the use of O3 precursor in sample B, surface roughness is increased. Reduction of spatial uniformity of the ALD ZnO films is due to the surface loss of O3 [21]. Surface loss of O3 is related to the transition from reaction- to recombination-limited growth and can constitute the primary atomic loss channel to destroy the films resulting in poor thickness uniformity. This is correlated to the reduction of diffraction peak intensity along (002) in sample B in Fig. 2. With the treatment of post-deposition TA in sample C, surface uniformity is meliorated. Meanwhile, a dramatic decrease of background electron concentration and increase of mobility are achieved. Thermal annealing brings about migration in crystal lattice; thus, metallurgic recrystallization takes place. Recrystallization accompanies the reduction in strength of strain/stress and intrinsic crystal lattice imperfections; therefore, better quality of ZnO thin film is attained. This result is consistent with the enhancement of two diffraction peak intensities in XRD pattern in sample C. It is worthy to note that electrons’ mobility can be affected by scattering sources such as impurities, lattices, and defects. That scattering sources could alter the average electron velocity. In general, reduction of defect density and hence decrease of electron concentration lead to the rise of mobility. In this report, an increase of roughness of surface texture due to the action of dosing ozone precursor could cause lower electron mobility in sample C than A. In Fig. 6, a pyramid diagram containing three triangles in different colors illustrates the three key growing and processing conditions to achieve high-quality ALD ZnO epilayers in this report.

Fig. 5

ac 2D and df 3D AFM images of specimens. The scale of height in 2D images are presented on the right color bar

Fig. 6

A pyramid diagram. In the pyramid, four triangles are illustrated in different colors. Three triangles at the edges of the pyramid show key growth and processing conditions of ZnO. Combination of these three crucial components in the growth promotes quality of ALD ZnO epilayers shown by the triangle at the center of the pyramid


One-pulsed H2O and three-pulsed strong oxidant O3 precursors in the ALD processes can diminish the strain/stress and hence conspicuously reduce electron concentration in ZnO thin film but increase surface roughness. Post-deposition TA at 300 °C in the ambience of oxygen (O2) for 1 h can further facilitate the formation of more defect-free grains with lower strain/stress, lower background electron concentration, and melioration of surface roughness after the growth of using three-pulsed O3 precursors. The lowest strain/stress and background electron concentration which are 0.49%/2.22 GPa and 9.4 × 1015 cm−3, respectively, owing to the dramatic decrease of intrinsic native defect of ALD-grown ZnO thin films are attained.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Yung-Chen Cheng) upon reasonable request.



Atomic layer deposition

O3 :



Thermal annealing

O2 :






H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide



Zni :

Zinc interstitials

VO :

Oxygen vacancies


Threading dislocations


Grain boundaries


Near bandgap edge

c-Al2O3 :

c-face sapphire



C2H5 :

Ethyl groups

N2 :

Nitrogen gas




X-ray diffraction


Atomic force microscope


Root mean square


  1. 1.

    Weckman T, Laasonen K (2016) Atomic layer deposition of zinc oxide: diethyl zinc reactions and surface saturation from first-principles. J Phys Chem C. 120:21460–21471

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang Y, Kang K-M, Kim M, Park H-H (2018) Low temperature method to passivate oxygen vacancies in un-doped ZnO films using atomic layer deposition. Thin Solid Films. 660:852–858

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Park J, Jung T-H, Lee J-H, Kim H-S, Park J-S (2015) The growth behavior and properties of atomic layer deposited zinc oxide films using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ozone (O3) oxidants. Ceram Int. 41:1839–1845

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Janocha E, Pettenkofer C (2011) ALD of ZnO using diethylzinc as metal-precursor and oxygen as oxidizing agent. Appl Surf Sci. 257:10031–10035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Knoops HCM, Elam JW, Libera JA, Kessels WMM (2011) Surface loss in ozone-based atomic layer deposition processes. Chem Mater. 23:2381–2387

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kim H, Wang Z, Hedhili MN, Wehbe N, Alshareef HN (2017) Oxidant-dependent thermoelectric properties of undoped ZnO films by atomic layer deposition. Chem Mater. 29:2794–2802

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    George SM (2010) Atomic layer deposition: an overview. Chem Rev. 110:111–131

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Johnson RW, Hultqvist A, Bent SF (2014) A brief review of atomic layer deposition: from fundamentals to applications. Mater Today. 17:236–246

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tynell T, Karppinen M. Atomic layer deposition of ZnO: a review. Semicond Sci Technol. 2014;29:043001-1–043001-5.

  10. 10.

    McCluskey MD, Jokela SJ. Defects in ZnO. J Appl Phys. 2009;106:071101-1–071101-13.

  11. 11.

    Look DC, Hemsky JW, Sizelove JR (1999) Residual native shallow donor in ZnO. Phys Rev Lett. 82:2552–2555

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang SB, Wei S-H, Zunger A. Intrinsic n-type versus p-type doping asymmetry and the defect physics of ZnO. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:075205-1–075205-7.

  13. 13.

    Van de Walle CG (2000) Hydrogen as a cause of doping in zinc oxide. Phys Rev Lett. 85:1012–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chichibu SF, Kojima K, Yamazaki Y, Furusawa K, Uedono A. Controlling the carrier lifetime of nearly threading-dislocation-free ZnO homoepitaxial films by 3d transition-metal doping. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108:021904-1–021904-5.

  15. 15.

    Ellmer K, Mientus R (2008) Carrier transport in polycrystalline transparent conductive oxides: a comparative study of zinc oxide and indium oxide. Thin Solid Films. 516:4620–4627

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McCluskey MD, Corolewski CD, Lv J, Tarun MC, Teklemichael ST, Walter ED, Norton MG, Harrison KW, Ha S. Acceptors in ZnO. J Appl Phys. 2015;117:112802-1–112802-6.

  17. 17.

    Ozgur U, Hofstetter D, Morkoc H (2010) ZnO devices and applications: a review of current status and future prospects. Proc IEEE. 98:1255–1268

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Vidya R, Ravindran P, Fjellvåg H, Svensson BG, Monakhov E, Ganchenkova M, Nieminen RM. Energetics of intrinsic defects and their complexes in ZnO investigated by density functional calculations. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:045206-1–045206-12.

  19. 19.

    Goyal A, Stevanovic V. Metastable rocksalt ZnO is p-type dopable. Phys Rev Materials. 2018;2:084603-1–084603-6.

  20. 20.

    Wu I-C, Weng Y-H, Lu M-Y, Jen C-P, Fedorov VE, Chen WC, Wu MT, Kuo C-T. Wang H-C. Nano-structure ZnO/Cu2O photoelectrochemical and self-powered biosensor for esophageal cancer cell detection. Opt Express. 2017;25:7689–7706.

  21. 21.

    Chen Y-S, Liao C-H, Chueh Y-L, Lai C-C, Chen L-Y, Chu A-K, Kuo C-T, Wang H-C (2014) High performance Cu2O/ZnO core-shell nanorod arrays synthesized using a nanoimprint GaN template by the hydrothermal growth technique. Opt Mater Express. 4:1473–1486

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ting S-Y, Chen P-J, Wang H-C, Liao C-H, Chang W-M, Hsieh Y-P, Yang CC (2012) Crystallinity improvement of ZnO thin film on different buffer layers grown by MBE. J Nanomater. 2012:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hur T-B, Hwang Y-H, Kim H-K. Strain effects in ZnO thin films and nanoparticles. J Appl Phys. 2006;99:064308-1–064308-5.

  24. 24.

    Rao TP, Santhosh Kumar MC, Angayarkanni SA, Ashok M (2009) Effect of stress on optical band gap of ZnO thin films with substrate temperature by spray pyrolysis. J Alloy Comp. 485:413–417

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chen H-C, Chen M-J, Wu M-K, Cheng Y-C, Tsai F-Y (2008) Low-threshold stimulated emission in ZnO thin films grown by atomic layer deposition. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron. 14:1053–1057

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cheng Y-C, Yuan K-Y, Chen M-J (2016) ZnO thin films prepared by atomic layer deposition at various temperatures from 100 to 180 °C with three-pulsed precursors in every growth cycle. J Alloy Comp. 685:391–394

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang H-C, Liao C-H, Chueh Y-L, Lai C-C, Chou P-C, Ting S-Y (2013) Crystallinity improvement of ZnO thin film by hierarchical thermal annealing. Opt Mater Express. 3:295–306

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wang H-C, Liao C-H, Chueh Y-L, Lai C-C, Chen L-H, Tsiang R C-C. Synthesis and characterization of ZnO/ZnMgO multiple quantum wells by molecular beam epitaxy. Opt Mater Express. 2013;3: 237-247.

  29. 29.

    Cheng Y-C, Yuan K-Y, Chen M-J (2017) Influence of homo-buffer layers and post-deposition rapid thermal annealing upon atomic layer deposition grown ZnO at 100 °C with three-pulsed precursors per growth cycle. J Cryst Growth. 475:39–43

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was correlated with Grant Proposal No. 107WFA0F10149 of Prof. Yung-Chen Cheng submitted to the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and revised Grant Proposal supported by the National University of Tainan. It was also supported by MOST Grant Proposal No. 108-2823-8-194-002 of Prof. Hsiang-Chen Wang (National Chung Cheng University).


This funding was supported by biomedical leap projects for cross-industry integration B10801 approved by Hsinchu Science Park of the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan.

Author information




YCC processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and designed the figures. HCW aided in interpreting the results. TPL, SKF, and KYY carried out the experiments and collected the data. YCC supervised the work of TPL. SWF supervised the work of SKF. MJC supervised the work of KYY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yung-Chen Cheng or Miin-Jang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Wang, H., Feng, S. et al. Co-dosing Ozone and Deionized Water as Oxidant Precursors of ZnO Thin Film Growth by Atomic Layer Deposition. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 154 (2020).

Download citation


  • Zinc oxide
  • Atomic layer deposition
  • Strain relaxation
  • Ozone precursor
  • Thermal annealing
  • Photoluminescence