Skip to main content

The speed-locking effect of particles on a graphene layer with travelling surface wave

Abstract

Fast diffusion induced by thermal fluctuation and vibration has been detected at nanoscales. In this paper, the movement of particle on a graphene layer with travelling surface wave is studied by molecular dynamics simulation and theoretical model. It is proved that the particle will keep moving at the wave speed with certain prerequisite conditions, namely speed-locking effect. By expressing van der Waals (vdW) potential between particle and wavy surface as a function of curvatures, the mechanism is clarified based on the puddle of potential in a relative wave-frame coordinate. Two prerequisite conditions are proposed: the initial position of particle should locate in the potential puddle, and the initial kinetic energy cannot drive particle to jump out of the potential puddle. The parametric analysis indicates that the speed-locking region will be affected by wavelength, amplitude and pair potential between particle and wave. With smaller wavelength, larger amplitude and stronger vdW potential, the speed-locking region is larger. This work reveals a new kind of coherent movement for particles on layered material based on the puddle potential theory, which can be an explanation for fast diffusion phenomena at nano scales.

Introduction

Recently, a series of surface wave/phonon-induced fast transport and diffusion phenomena are detected at micro/nanoscale. At first, the thermophoric phenomena along a carbon nanotube [1,2,3,4,5] or a graphene ribbon [6,7,8,9,10] have been extensively investigated. Thermal fluctuations are confirmed to enable continuous water flow through a carbon nanotube (CNT) by imposing an axial thermal gradient along its surface [11,12,13]. Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations are done to explore the feasibility of utilizing a thermal gradient on a large graphene substrate to control the motion of a small graphene nanoflake [6]. In addition, thermally driven water droplet transport on graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) surfaces is studied by molecular dynamics simulations [8, 9]. These phenomena are suggested to correlate with certain modes of phonons [14,15,16,17,18,19]. For example, Schoen et al. attributed the thermophoric motion inside a carbon nanotube to the breathing mode of the tube [1, 20]. Panizon et al. [21] pointed out flexural travelling waves/phonons on graphene can pass their momentum to the adsorbates and cause the transport. Similar to thermophoric phenomena, Angelos et al. showed temperature-induced propagating ripples on graphene can lead to fast diffusion of water nanodroplets that is 2–3 orders of magnitude faster than the self-diffusion of water molecules in liquid water [22, 23].

In addition to thermal fluctuation, studies confirm that the vibration can also transport particles and droplets in and outside a carbon nanotube (CNT) [24,25,26,27]. For example, the nanodroplets are transported along the nanotube with a velocity close to 30 nm/ns when linearly polarized transverse acoustic waves pass linear momentum to the nanodroplet [24, 28]. Guo et al. demonstrated that water molecules inside a vibrating cantilever are driven by centrifugal forces and can undergo a continuous flow from the fixed to free ends of the CNT by molecular dynamics simulations [26, 29]. A novel nanoscale unidirectional transport of water molecules through a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) is designed by using a vibration charge and a composite SWCNT with asymmetrical surface energy [30]. Zhou et al. [31] investigated current inversions in a nanosized water pump based on a single-walled carbon nanotube powered by mechanical vibration and confirmed the water current depended sensitively on the frequency of mechanical vibration. Chang and Guo [32] discovered the domino wave in carbon nanotubes which can shoot the inner molecule with a large speed up to 1 km/s. A reversible domino process is also proved in single-walled carbon nanotubes [33].

As various fast diffusion and transport phenomena induced by thermal fluctuations and vibration are detected at nanoscales, it is confirmed that the up and down movement on the surface can enhance the diffusion and transport. The connection between wave and particles’ motion is still unclear and cannot be unified. A main explanation is that the momentum of the surface can be transported to particle or droplets outside the surface [22, 24]. But the relation between amplitude, frequency and interaction between particle and surface cannot be figured out from this explanation. In addition, Angelos et al. pointed out that a clear preference for one sign of graphene curvature is necessary for fast diffusion of adsorbate on the graphene surface [22], which indicates the interaction potential induced by wavy surface morphology is closely related to the fast diffusion. Thus, exploring the interaction between wavy surface and outside particle is of essential importance to understand the mechanism of fast transport and diffusion at nanoscales.

In this paper, by studying particle outside wavy graphene surface based on vdW interaction depicted by Lennard–Jones (L–J) pair potential, a coherent relation between wavy movement and particle’s velocity is demonstrated by MD simulations. The overall speed of particle dropped onto the wavy surface is confirmed to keep the same as the travelling wave with certain prerequisite conditions, namely speed-locking effect. Then, a potential puddle theory is built based on the interaction potential between particle and wave surface expressed as a function of curvatures [34,35,36]. With this theory, two prerequisite conditions for speed-locking effect are proposed, and the trajectory and velocity predicted by the potential puddle theory agrees well with MD simulation results. Also, the effect of wavelength and amplitude as well as the vdW interaction parameters is analysed, which shows good agreement to the regulation detected for droplets surfing phenomena on the graphene surface [22]. The mechanism of wave-driven speed-locking effect reveals a new coherent relation between particle velocity and wavy surface.

Methods

The MD simulation is implemented in the software package Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS). The wavy surface is assumed to be a graphene layer, which has an atomic number density of \(\rho = 3.85 \times 10^{19} \,{\text{m}}^{ - 2}\). The graphene sheet is initially flat with z = 0 Å and is 6344 Å long along x direction, resulting in a unit cell size of 6000 atoms. Along y-axis the periodic boundary condition is used with a period length of 12.2 Å. Here, a spherical particle is considered with the mass of \(m = 0.83 \times 10^{ - 25} \,{\text{kg}}\), in order to simplify the model and focus on the geometrical effect of the wavy surface. In the beginning, the particle is placed at z = 7 Å and x = 200 Å. It has an initial speed of − 50 m/s in z-direction and about 2000 m/s in x-direction. By setting a starting time for initial speed in z-direction, the initial position can be controlled for the particle falling on the wavy surface.

The reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential is adopted to model graphene atoms [37]. Meanwhile, the Lennard–Jones potential is chosen to model the interaction between particle \(P\) and each carbon atom in graphene as,

$$u\left( R \right) = \varepsilon \left( {{\sigma \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\sigma R}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} R}} \right)^{12} - \varepsilon \left( {{\sigma \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\sigma R}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} R}} \right)^{6}$$
(1)

where \(\varepsilon = 5.92 \times 10^{ - 21} \,{\text{J}}\) and \(\sigma = 4 \times 10^{ - 10} \,{\text{m}}\). The equilibrium height between particle \(P\) and the curved surface is taken as \(h = 4.2 \times 10^{ - 10} \,{\text{m}}\), decided by the condition of the normal force as zero and simulation results, which is detailed in Additional file 1: 1.

The travelling wave function takes a sinusoidal form as,

$$y = A\sin \left( {\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }x - \omega t} \right)$$
(2)

where the amplitude is taken as \(A = 1 \times 10^{ - 9} \,{\text{m}}\) and the wavelength is \(\lambda = 21.75 \times 10^{ - 9} \,{\text{m}}\) unless otherwise noted. The angular frequency is taken as \(\omega = {{2\pi } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{2\pi } {10^{ - 12} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {10^{ - 12} }}\) corresponding to a period of 10 ps; thus, the wave speed is \(v_{{{\text{wave}}}} = 2175\,{\text{m}}/{\text{s}} = \lambda \omega /2\pi\). To trigger the travelling wave, the left 10 Å of graphene (i.e. y \(\in\) [− 10, 0] Å) is wiggled in z-direction with the amplitude and frequency mentioned above. Moreover, carbon atoms with x > 6010 Å is clamped to keep the graphene sheet stable. In particular, if a flat graphene sheet is to be simulated, unclamped graphene atoms will also be tethered to their initial positions along z-axis with a weak spring constant of 0.0938 eV//Å2 (besides A is set to 0).

An initial temperature of 5 K is assigned to unfixed carbon atoms. This temperature is set to eliminate the thermally activated ripples caused by a harmonic coupling between the bending and stretching modes of graphene and focus on the effect of the travelling wave caused by mechanical excitation [22]. The structure then evolves in micro-canonical ensemble (NVE) with a time step of 1 fs. We monitored this evolution and found temperature nearly unchanged during the whole simulation.

Results and Discussion

The trajectory of particles on wavy graphene surface as well as flat graphene surface is illustrated in Fig. 1. The time interval is taken as the period of wavy surface. It is found that the relative position of particle does not change in reference to the wave crests or troughs, which means the particle is locked on the wavy surface with its speed equal to the wave speed. As a comparison, the particle’s overall motion on the flat surface is apparently slower than that on a wavy surface with the same initial position. The speed of particle diminishes quickly on the flat surface due to friction, whereas the friction seems not working for particles on wavy graphene surface. More MD simulation cases with different simulation temperatures and parameters of wave function are shown in Additional file 1: 1. The simulations of atom Xe and molecule C60 moving on wavy and flat surface are done to confirm the generalizability of this phenomenon and shown in Additional file 1: 2.

Fig. 1
figure1

The trajectories of particle on wavy and flat graphene surfaces

To understand the mechanism of speed-locking effect at nanoscales, a model is built by considering the interaction between wavy surface S and an external particle P, which is shown in Fig. 2a, b. Assuming that the wavelength and amplitude of wavy surface are \(\lambda\) and A, respectively, the nearest height between P and S is h, the number density of S is \({\rho }_{s}\). In MD simulation, the interaction between particle P and wavy surface is taken as vdW interaction, which is depicted by L–J potential,

$$U_{{{\text{L}} {-} {\text{J}}}} = \varepsilon \left[ {\left( {\frac{\sigma }{r}} \right)^{12} - \left( {\frac{\sigma }{r}} \right)^{6} } \right]$$
Fig. 2
figure2

Geometry configurations and potential distribution. a The 3D model of wavy surface S and an external particle P with the nearest point P1 on the surface; b the 2D model of the wavy surface S and particle P; c the comparison between interaction potentials of wavy surface S and an external particle P by Eq. (1) and MD simulation; d the relative potential distribution in PXY coordinate

Then, the interaction between P and S is proved to be written as a function of mean curvature and Gauss curvature based on L–J pair potential [34,35,36],

$$\begin{aligned} U_{6 - 12} & = \frac{{4\pi \rho_{s} \varepsilon \sigma^{12} }}{{5h^{10} }}\left[ {1 - hH + h^{2} H^{2} + \frac{{9h^{2} }}{16}\left( {H^{2} - K} \right)} \right] \\ & \quad - \,\frac{{2\pi \rho_{s} \varepsilon \sigma^{6} }}{{h^{4} }}\left[ {1 - hH + h^{2} H^{2} + \frac{{3h^{2} }}{4}\left( {H^{2} - K} \right)} \right] \\ \end{aligned}$$
(3)

Here, point \(P_{1}\) is the nearest point on surface S to particle P, and H and \(K\) are the mean curvature and the Gauss curvature at point \(P_{1}\) (Fig. 2a) [20], respectively. Through this curvature-based potential [Eq. (3)] has been used in explaining many abnormal phenomena at micro/nano scales [38, 39], the reliability of Eq. (3) in this case is validated by compared with the surface potential in MD simulation for parameters given above and displayed in Fig. 2c.

Before analysing the influence of wavy surface on particle P, friction should be investigated and taken account. The friction between particles and the wave surface can be very complicated at nanoscales [39,40,41,42,43]. A primitive estimation of the friction is made by simulating the motion of a particle on a flat graphene layer by MD as detailed in Additional file 1: 3. For convenience, here a flat surface instead of wavy one is taken. This approximation is estimated in Additional file 1: 3 combined with further potential puddle mechanism. With parameters given above, the friction is estimated as \(f = - 5.2 \times 10^{ - 13} \,{\text{N}}\).

Then, the relative potential between surface S and particle P is investigated by considering friction. Firstly, a relative wave-frame coordinate \(PXY\) is built as shown in red colour in Fig. 2b, which moves at the wave speed thus keeps stationary to the travelling wave. So, the travelling wave is “frozen” in \(PXY\). Since the particle keeps moving rightward in reference to the graphene, the friction acting on it will constantly be leftward along the surface. As a result, the relative wave-frame potential will be the curvature-based potential minus the work done by friction,

$$P = U_{n} + f * x$$
(4)

Substituting the curvature-based potential Un and friction into Eq. (4), the relative wave-frame potential can be evaluated and is drawn in Fig. 2d.

Since the wave-frame coordinate PXY moves along with the travelling wave, the initial location of particle P in the potential determines the particle’s trajectory. Assuming that the initial velocity of particle P is \(v_{0}\) and the wave speed is \(v_{{{\text{wave}}}}\), two prerequisite conditions can be proposed based on Fig. 2d: the initial position of particle \(P\) locates in potential puddle of the red zone \(\lambda_{1}\); the initial wave-frame kinetic energy satisfies \(\frac{1}{2}m\left( {v_{0} - v_{{{\text{wave}}}} } \right)^{2} \le \Delta U\). Then, the particle will not be able to hop out the puddle but instead be trapped and wobble inside the puddle. In perspective of an absolute coordinate, particle \(P\) will oscillate in the potential puddle but keep moving with propagating wave by the speed locked around the wave speed, hence the speed-locking effect. Otherwise, if the initial location of particle \(P\) falls inside the blue zone \(\lambda_{2}\) or the relative initial kinetic energy \(\frac{1}{2}m\left( {v_{0} - v_{{{\text{wave}}}} } \right)^{2} > \Delta U\), the particle \(P\) will not stay inside a single puddle but hops leftward to lower puddles along the wave-frame potential surface. In the perspective of an absolute coordinate, the particle will lag behind the propagating wave until another equilibrium of forces is met. One possibility of such equilibrium is that the particle stops moving on graphene thus the friction vanishes. Interestingly, in lit [21]. Panizon et al. reveal that when there is a velocity difference, the travelling wave will be scattered by the particle and offer a propulsion force, suggesting the final speed of particle will be larger than zero.

To formulate and better illustrate our theory, the movement equation of particle P is further established by Newton's laws of motion. The driving forces exerted on particle P include two parts, normal force \(F_{{\text{n}}}\) and tangential force \(F_{{\text{t}}}\), namely (Fig. 2b),

$$F_{{\text{n}}} = \frac{{\partial U_{6 - 12} }}{\partial h}; \, F_{{\text{t}}} = \frac{{\partial U_{6 - 12} }}{\partial H}\nabla H + \frac{{\partial U_{6 - 12} }}{\partial K}\nabla K$$
(5)

For L–J potential, both attractive and repulsive interactions exist between atoms, the external particle \(P\) will stay at a height h where the normal force \(F_{{\text{n}}}\) is zero, the determination calculation of height h is put in Additional file 1: 2. Then, the equation of motion of particle \(P\) in \(x\) direction is,

$$m\ddot{x} = F_{x} - f$$
(6)

Here, \(F_{x}\) is the component of tangential force \(F_{{\text{t}}}\) in \(x\) direction (Fig. 2b). Calculating Eq. (6) gives the particle trajectory. For the sinusoidal wave surface, Gaussian curvature is zero and the mean curvature equals to the curvature of curve in \(Ozx\) surface, i.e. \(K = 0\) and \(H = \kappa\) [52], substituting Eq. (5) into (6), the moving trajectory of particle P can be solved numerically.

The locking and unlocking examples are shown in Fig. 3. For the initial location (Fig. 3a) corresponding to the locking region \(\lambda_{1}\) in Fig. 2d, the trajectories from theoretical and MD simulation results are compared in Fig. 3b. It shows that the particle stops moving on the flat graphene surface in a very short time due to friction, while the particle keeps moving rightward on the wave surface. And the theoretical trajectory approximates to MD simulation results. This tendency is further confirmed in Fig. 3c for particle’s velocity shown in ten times of simulation time. Since the particle falls in the locking zone and the initial speed equals to the wave speed, it will oscillate in the potential puddle and its overall speed will equal to the wave speed, which is in accordance to our speculation. For particle with its initial location (Fig. 3d) falling in unlocking region \(\lambda_{2}\) in Fig. 2d, trajectory of particle on wave surface tends to a constant (Fig. 3e) and is confirmed further by the velocity distribution. It is interesting that the travelling wave can enhance particle’s motion even when it falls on speed unlocking region compared to the motion of particle on flat graphene surface. Figure 3f illustrates that the velocity will decrease to zero for time longer than simulation time. More examples are illustrated in Additional file 1: 3.

Fig. 3
figure3

Examples of locking and unlocking. a A schematic view showing how the particle lands on the speed-locking region \(\lambda_{1}\) of wavy graphene surface where the initial particle speed is \(v_{0} = 2175\,{{\text{m}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\text{m}} {\text{s}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\text{s}}}\); b a schematic view showing how the particle lands on the speed unlocking region \(\lambda_{2}\) of the wavy graphene surface; c the trajectories of particles by both MD simulation and theory, the trajectory of a particle on flat graphene is also plotted for comparison; d the time evolution of particle velocity by Eq. (6); e the trajectories of particle by both MD simulation and theory; f the time evolution of particle velocity by Eq. (6)

According to the potential puddle mechanism, the speed-locking effect of particle is dominated by the potential wave surface. The effect of parameters can be discussed based on potential puddle theory. Obviously, these include wavelength \(\lambda\), amplitude A, frequency \(\omega\) and the L–J potential parameters. It is noted that the friction is assumed to remain the same regarding to different parameters in following analysis. The potential distributions for different wavelength A, amplitude \(\lambda\) and the L–J potential parameter \(\varepsilon\) are illustrated in Fig. 4, respectively. Figure 4a reveals that the potential puddle depth decreases with an increase of \(\lambda\), and there will be no speed-locking range when wavelength exceeds a critical value. Also, since a lower frequency \(\omega\) relates to a larger \(\lambda\), the speed-locking range decreases with an increase of \(\omega\). Figure 4b illustrates that the potential puddle depth increases with an increase of A, and the speed-locking effect vanishes when the amplitude is too small. It is noted that the ratio A/\(\lambda\) should not be too large to prevent from damages. Usually, both \(\lambda\) and A increase when the scale of wave or particles increases. To study the scale effect, we keep the ratio \(\lambda\)/A fixed and examine the influence of varying \(\lambda\) or A. Figure 4c shows the potential puddle depth decrease swiftly with an increasing \(\lambda\) or A. This indicates that the curvature-based driving force decrease quickly with an increasing scale, so the speed-locking effect for particles will vanish on surface with large-scale wave. For L–J potential parameter \(\varepsilon\), it is confirmed that the speed-locking region will be broader when the pair interaction potential is strong and the speed-locking effect will disappear when the pair interaction potential is weak (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure4

The effect of parameters on potential pubble: a the effect of wavelength; b the effect of wave amplitude; c the effect of ratio of wavelength and amplitude; d the effect of L–J potential parameter

It is noted that the stiffness and L–J potential parameters are different for other 2D nanomaterials, which lead to different frequency and wave speed [44]. According to parameter analysis, the potential puddle will appear by choosing proper wavelength and amplitude for wavy surface. As the potential puddle is the precondition for particles moving with wavy surface, this speed-locking effect will also establish for many 2D nanomaterial layers under the short-range interaction.

Although the movement of one particle is discussed in this paper, it is still in the frame of thermo environment. The potential puddle is the essential condition for the coupling movement between particle and surface. For multiple particles, if they all locate in potential puddle region and satisfy the prerequisite conditions, they will be trapped and moves with the wavy surface. According to the parameters effect, the movement of particles can be controllable by adjusting the wavelength and amplitude. As the speed-locking region will be larger for surface wave with smaller wavelength, larger amplitude and higher frequency, the fast diffusion on the wavy surface will also be enhanced. The parametric analysis is also in accordance to the fast diffusion regulation detected in many other literatures. For example, Angelos et al. pointed out that the diffusion coefficient increases with the ripple amplitude of graphene surface [22]. They confirmed that the amplitude of the ripples increases revealing an increased preference of the droplets for the valleys, which can be explained by Fig. 4b. When the amplitude increases enough, the speed-locking region would probably cover the whole wavelength and enhance the diffusion. In addition, they pointed out that the potential for the valley is always smaller than the potential for crest [22] (Fig. 4), which is responding to lower potential for the crest region shown in Fig. 4. Cao et al. studied the flow of fluid inside nanochannel in the presence of travelling surface waves and confirmed that the velocity increases with the increasing of amplitude and frequency [45], which is also in accordance to the parametric analysis.

MD simulation can only reflect the property in a very short time, more potential application of this speed-locking effect can be deduced from the potential puddle mechanism. For example, by adjusting the amplitude and frequency, it is possible to realize almost locking or unlocking region, which can drive particles to move or stop. It is noted that the wavy movement of surface in vertical direction can be transformed into the movement of particle in transverse direction, which is similar to a kind of ratchet movement and may be used in nano-electro-mechanical system. In addition, as the interaction between particle and surface will affect the movement, the trajectory enhanced by wavy surface will be different for particles with different pair potentials, which can lead to phrase separation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrate a distinctive relation between particle and graphene layer with travelling surface wave, i.e. speed-locking phenomenon. By MD simulation, it confirmed that the speed of particle can be kept around wave speed with certain conditions. A theoretical model is built to elucidate the mechanism, where the puddle of potential surface dominates the locking effect. The locking conditions are proposed based on this model, i.e. the initial position of particle locates in the potential puddle and initial kinetic energy cannot drive particle to hop out of potential puddle. The particle trajectory predicted by theoretical predictions agrees well with MD simulations results. The effect of wavelength and amplitude as well as L–J potential parameter is discussed. The work also provides a new perspective to understand the fast diffusion and transport on wavy surface and potential applications for phrase separations.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].

Abbreviations

MD:

Molecular dynamics

vdW:

Van der Waals

CNT:

Carbon nanotube

h-BN:

Hexagonal boron nitride

SWCNT:

Single-walled carbon nanotube

L–J:

Lennard–Jones

LAMMPS:

Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator

REBO:

Reactive empirical bond order

NVE:

Micro-canonical ensemble

References

  1. 1.

    Schoen PAE, Walther JH, Poulikakos D et al (2007) Phonon assisted thermophoretic motion of gold nanoparticles inside carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2748367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zambrano HA, Walther JH, Koumoutsakos P et al (2009) Thermophoretic motion of water nanodroplets confined inside carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802429s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hou QW, Cao BY, Guo ZY (2009) Thermal gradient induced actuation in double-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/49/495503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barreiro A, Rurali R, Hernández ER et al (2008) Subnanometer motion of cargoes driven by thermal gradients along carbon nanotubes. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ishii H, Kobayashi N, Hirose K (2010) Order-N electron transport calculations from ballistic to diffusive regimes by a time-dependent wave-packet diffusion method: application to transport properties of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.085435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Becton M, Wang X (2014) Thermal gradients on graphene to drive nanoflake motion. J Chem Theor Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400963d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Neek-Amal M, Abedpour N, Rasuli SN et al (2010) Diffusive motion of C60 on a graphene sheet. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.051605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rajegowda R, Kannam SK, Hartkamp R et al (2018) Thermophoretically driven water droplets on graphene and boron nitride surfaces. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aab3a3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tagliacozzo A, Campagnano G, Giuliano D et al (2019) Thermal transport driven by charge imbalance in graphene in a magnetic field close to the charge neutrality point at low temperature: nonlocal resistance. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.155417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu B, Meng F, Reddy CD et al (2015) Thermal transport in a graphene–MoS2 bilayer heterostructure: a molecular dynamics study. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA16891G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Oyarzua E, Walther JH, Megaridis CM et al (2017) Carbon nanotubes as thermally induced water pumps. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b04177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen M, Zang J, Xiao D et al (2009) Nanopumping molecules via a carbon nanotube. Nano Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-009-9096-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Insepov Z, Wolf D, Hassanein A (2006) Nanopumping using carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl060932m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cruz-Chu ER, Papadopoulou E, Walther JH et al (2017) On phonons and water flow enhancement in carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li X, Gao J, Liu G (2013) Erratum. Reversible luminance decay in polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4815991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kral P, Wang B (2013) Material drag phenomena in nanotubes. Chem Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200244h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wei N, Wang HQ, Zheng JC (2012) Nanoparticle manipulation by thermal gradient. Nanoscale Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huang Y, Zhu S, Li T (2014) Directional transport of molecular mass on graphene by straining. Extreme Mech Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2014.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sengupta S (2019) Theory of phonon-assisted adsorption in graphene: many-body infrared dynamics. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.075429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang QL, Jiang WZ, Liu J et al (2013) Water transport through carbon nanotubes with the radial breathing mode. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.254501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Panizon E, Guerra R, Tosatti E (2017) Ballistic thermophoresis of adsorbates on free-standing graphene. Proc Natl A Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708098114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ma M, Tocci G, Michaelides A et al (2016) Fast diffusion of water nanodroplets on graphene. Nat Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li C, Huang J, Li Z (2016) A relation for nanodroplet diffusion on smooth surfaces. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Russell JT, Wang B, Král P (2012) Nanodroplet transport on vibrated nanotubes. J Phys Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz201614m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Prasad MVD, Bhattacharya B (2016) Phonon scattering dynamics of thermophoretic motion in carbon nanotube oscillators. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Qiu H, Shen R, Guo W (2011) Vibrating carbon nanotubes as water pumps. Nano Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-010-0080-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ritter C, Muniz RB, Makler SS et al (2010) Molecular vibration sensor via transport measurements in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.113407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hu ZL, Mårtensson G, Murugesan M et al (2012) Detecting single molecules inside a carbon nanotube to control molecular sequences using inertia trapping phenomenon. Appl Phys Lett 101(13):133105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4754617

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Duan WH, Wang Q (2010) Water transport with a carbon nanotube pump. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1001694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kou J, Zhou X, Lu H et al (2012) A vibration-charge-induced unidirectional transport of water molecules in confined nanochannels. Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM26429C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhou X, Wu F, Liu Y et al (2015) Current inversions induced by resonant coupling to surface waves in a nanosized water pump. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.053017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chang T, Guo Z (2010) Temperature-induced reversible dominoes in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101623c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chang T (2008) Dominoes in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.175501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lv C, Chen C, Chuang YC et al (2014) Substrate curvature gradient drives rapid droplet motion. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.026101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu JY, Yin YJ, Wang XG et al (2012) Interaction potential between micro/nano curved surface and a particle located inside the surface (I): driving forces induced by curvatures. Sci China Phys Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4738-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang D, Yin Y, Zhong Z et al (2019) Surface evolution caused by curvature driven forces based on natural exponential pair potential. Acta Mech Sin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-018-0826-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Perriot R, Gu X, Lin Y et al (2013) Screened environment-dependent reactive empirical bond-order potential for atomistic simulations of carbon materials. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.064101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fang X, Li Y, Wang D et al (2016) Surface evolution at nanoscale during oxidation: a competing mechanism between local curvature effect and stress effect. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4947182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang M, Meng H, Wang D et al (2019) Nanochannels: dynamic curvature nanochannel-based membrane with anomalous ionic transport behaviors and reversible rectification switch. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201970075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Torche PC, Polcar T, Hovorka O (2019) Thermodynamic aspects of nanoscale friction. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.125431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Torres ES, Gonçalves S, Scherer C et al (2006) Nanoscale sliding friction versus commensuration ratio: molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.035434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li Q, Dong Y, Perez D et al (2011) Speed dependence of atomic stick-slip friction in optimally matched experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.126101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Rastei MV, Guzmán P, Gallani JL (2014) Sliding speed-induced nanoscale friction mosaicity at the graphite surface. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Liu B, Zhou K (2019) Recent progress on graphene-analogous 2D nanomaterials: properties, modeling and applications. Prog Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Xie JF, Cao BY (2017) Fast nanofluidics by travelling surface waves. Microfluid Nanofluid. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-1946-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Oliver Seeck and Prof. Yajun Yin for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding

This research is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11902151 and 11802121), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20180411 and BK20180416) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities NE2018002.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DW built the theoretical model, carried out the simulation, analysed the data and wrote the paper. LW participated in the discussion and revised the paper. ZH generated the research idea, built the theoretical model, carried out the simulation and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhili Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

More simulation results with different parameters and particles.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Wang, L. & Hu, Z. The speed-locking effect of particles on a graphene layer with travelling surface wave. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03434-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Wave-driven mechanism
  • Speed-locking effect
  • Interaction potential
  • Nanoscale fast diffusion
  • Molecular simulation