Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Comparison of the analytical methods for the determination of aluminium ion

From: Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Electroactive Dye/LDHs Nanoplatelet Matrix Film for Advanced Dual Electro-optical Sensing Applications

Method

Detection limit

Response time

Linear calibration graph

RSD (%)

Sample

References

ICP-AES

1.96 × 10–3 (mg/L)

3.7

Biological samples and

[25]

ICP-AES

6 × 10–5 (mg/L)

3 s

1.6

Human urine samples

[26]

ICP-MS

5 × 10–5 (mg/L)

11

Lake water

[27]

GF-AAS

9 × 10–5 (mg/L)

(1 × 10–5 to 250 × 10–5) × 10–5 (mg/L)

3.1–5.2

Biological and environmental

[28]

HR-CS

1.8 × 10–4 (mg/L)

(0.1 to 20.0) (mg/L)

2.4

Real water samples

[29]

FAAS

7.71 × 10–3 (mg/L)

 

(1 × 10–3 to 20 × 10–3) (mg/L)

5

Dam waters

[30]

Fluorescence

4.7 × 10–7(mol/L)

3 min

(6.19 × 10–7 to 6 × 10−5) (mol/L)

< 5.0

Spiked lake and river water samples

[31]

Fluorescence

3.62 × 10–6 (mol/L)

40 s

(3.62 × 10–6 to 1 × 10−4) (mol/L)

2.82

Synthetic water

[32]

Colorimetric

1 × 10–3 (mg/L)

35 s

(0.1–1.0) × 10–3 (mg/L)

2.4–3.1

Synthetic water

[33]

Fluorescence

4.8 × 10–12 (M/L)

15 min

(1.0 × 10 −10 to 1.0 × 10–5) (M/L)

< 5.0

Synthetic water

[34]

Reflectance

10–5 (mol/L)

5 min

(0.34 × 10–3 to 10.75 × 10–3) (mg/L)

 

[35]

Diffuse reflectance

6.7 × 10–6 (mg/ L)

 

(6.7 × 10–6 to 7.4 × 10–6) (mol/L)

8.8

Synthetic water

[36]

Fluorescence

1.1 × 10–5 (mg/L)

5

Dialysis solutions and water

[37]

Navigation