Skip to main content

Fabrication of High-Quality and Strain-Relaxed GeSn Microdisks by Integrating Selective Epitaxial Growth and Selective Wet Etching Methods


GeSn is a promising material for the fabrication of on-chip photonic and nanoelectronic devices. Processing techniques dedicated to GeSn have thus been developed, including epitaxy, annealing, ion implantation, and etching. In this work, suspended, strain-relaxed, and high-quality GeSn microdisks are realized by a new approach without any etching to GeSn alloy. The GeSn alloy was grown on pre-patterned Ge (001) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy at low temperatures. The transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were carried out to determine the microstructures of the GeSn samples. The microdisks with different diameters of Ge pedestals were fabricated by controlling the selective wet etching time, and micro-Raman results show that the microdisks with different dimensions of the remaining Ge pedestals have different extents of strain relaxation. The compressive strain of microdisks is almost completely relaxed under suitable conditions. The semiconductor processing technology presented in this work can be an alternative method to fabricate innovative GeSn and other materials based micro/nano-structures for a range of Si-compatible photonics, 3D-MOSFETs, and microelectromechanical device applications.


Germanium-tin (GeSn), a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatible group IV material, has drawn significant attention in recent years for its applications in electronics and optoelectronics. Alloying more Sn into Ge can improve the carrier mobility as well as change the bandgap from indirect to direct transition [1, 2]. Theoretical work [3,4,5] and photoluminescence-based experiment studies [6,7,8] show that the indirect-to-direct transition for relaxed GeSn alloy occurs at Sn content no less than 6.5%. However, the low (1%) equilibrium solubility of Sn in Ge [9, 10] and the large lattice mismatch (~ 15%) between Ge and α-Sn introduce enormous challenges for the realization of defect-free GeSn alloy with even a few atomic % of substitutional Sn. The use of non-equilibrium growth techniques such as low-temperature molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [11,12,13,14,15], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [16,17,18,19,20], and solid-phase epitaxy [21, 22] is in great need.

In the case of GeSn alloy grown on strain-relaxed Ge virtual substrate or Ge substrate, the highest quality of GeSn is expected to be achieved in the pseudomorphic, or fully-strained condition which can avoid the formation of misfits and threading dislocations. Nevertheless, such GeSn alloy is compressively strained (~ 0.15% per 1% Sn) and this epitaxy-induced strain negates the effect of alloying Sn with Ge for bandgap conversion. As a result, a much higher Sn content of 17% for pseudomorphic GeSn epi-layer on Ge (001) [23] is required to achieve the direct bandgap, leading to extremely high challenges for epitaxy and low material quality. Therefore, manipulation of the strain without sacrificing the quality of crystal of the GeSn epi-layers becomes a very important issue. Selective removal of the stress-inducing Ge virtual substrate or Ge substrate under the GeSn epi-layers to form partially suspended microstructures is a promising technique to overcome the compressive strain in the GeSn films. For example, suspended GeSn microdisks with a supporting pillar in the center were fabricated [24,25,26,27,28]. The structure can not only relax the compressive strain in GeSn layer through elastic deformation at free surfaces but also confine optical models near the edge of the microdisk due to the strong refractive index contrast between the GeSn and the surrounding medium (air), such as whispering-gallery-mode [16, 25]. Up to now, only one method to prepare GeSn microdisk through the post-growth optical lithography and top-down etching of the two-dimensional GeSn film is reported [16, 24, 29, 30]. However, the process may suffer thermal mismatch effects during the post-growth etching process, which will lead to a degraded material quality of GeSn microdisks. Recently, P.Ponath et al. reported the selective area growth of highly crystalline c-axis oriented BTO [31], which inspired us for the fabrication of GeSn microstructures. By depositing directly GeSn microdisks at last step on a pre-patterned SiO2/Ge substrate and then selectively etching away the Ge substrate following the sacrificial SiO2 layer removal, suspended GeSn microdisks can be fabricated without the conventional and complex post-growth etching process. Such a method, if feasible, can avoid the aforementioned problems and thus obtain a higher-quality and strain-relaxed GeSn microstructure. Moreover, it is also a very promising method which can achieve arbitrary patterns with high accuracy and a good aspect ratio, especially for three-dimensional integration of complex device structures which need an exact thickness control of layers.

In this paper, GeSn microdisk structures were fabricated successfully by a new method. It is the first time to prepare GeSn microdisks by combining selective epitaxial growth with a simple step of selective wet etching. The thickness, the Sn concentration, and the crystal quality of the GeSn epi-layer were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-Raman spectroscopy (μ-Raman) were used to gain insights into the microstructures of the fabricated GeSn microdisks. Room temperature (RT) μ-Raman results show that the microdisks with different dimensions of the remaining Ge pedestals have different extents of strain relaxation. The compressive strain of microdisks is almost completely relaxed under suitable conditions. This method to fabricate microdisks without the need to etch the GeSn itself is beneficial to obtain relaxed and high-quality GeSn and other materials nanostructures.



The Ge wafers were purchased from AXT company. Acetone, isopropyl alcohol, hydrofluoric acid, ethyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, ammonia aqueous and potassium hydroxide were supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent (China). Deionized H2O (18.2 MΩ·cm) was obtained from an ultrafiltration system (Milli-Q, Millipore, Marlborough, MA).

Preparation of the Patterned Ge Substrate

Ge (001) wafers (n-type, 0.025–0.031 Ωcm) were first immersed in acetone and isopropyl alcohol for 3 min and then chemically cleaned using a diluted hydrofluoric acid solution (HF:H2O = 1:20) for 20 s at RT. This was followed by a rinse in running deionized H2O (DI–H2O). The cleaning procedure is of importance, especially the HF treatment to peel-off the native oxide layer and to ensure that the Ge surface is clean and close contact with the next SiO2 layer. In this case, the lift off profile is achieved by the deposition of a Si/SiO2 composite layer. Then the wafers were dried by blowing dry N2 and quickly loaded into the ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) chamber of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and annealed at 300 °C for 20 min to completely outgas. Then, a 300 nm SiO2 layer was deposited at the same temperature by PECVD followed by a deposition of 50 nm undoped polycrystalline Si by magnetron sputtering at RT, as shown in Fig. 1a. Circular openings in the Si/SiO2 composite layer are patterned by using standard photolithography technique (Fig. 1b) and two-step etching processes (Fig. 1c, d).

Fig. 1

The cross-sectional schematics illustration for the fabrication of the suspended GeSn microdisks

In detail, prior to pattern the Si/SiO2/Ge wafer, the wafer was cleaned by acetone, ethyl alcohol, and DI-H2O, then blow-dried with N2 and pre-baked in an oven at 90 °C. Thereafter, it was spin-coated by AZ5214 photoresist using a spin-coater at a speed of 4000 r/min for 30 s and then placed on a hotplate for soft baking at 90 °C for 2 min. The plate-making machine (Heidelberg, uPG501) was then utilized to create circle-shape pattern arrays on the Si/SiO2/Ge stacks. The circular patterns are fixed at 5 μm apart from each other, while the diameter ranges from 3 to 5 μm. The patterns were then transferred to the bottom SiO2 layer by two-step etching. The anisotropic dry etching by reactive ion etching with a mixed gas of CF4 and O2 was firstly employed to etch Si/SiO2 layers and stopped with about 20 nm SiO2 left. Then dissolving the photoresist and wet etching using diluted HF at RT was hired to remove the left SiO2 layer to both expose the germanium in the circular openings and also to etch laterally under the defined polysilicon edge to create an overhang which is the desired profile for lift off.

GeSn Growth and Microdisk Fabrication

For the GeSn thin film deposition, a solid source MBE system (Riber SSC) with a base pressure of 2 × 10−10 Torr was used [32]. An electron beam evaporator and a pyrolytic BN effusion cell using high-purity solid sources are equipped for Ge and Sn evaporation in the MBE system. A quartz crystal monitor was used to calibrate the deposition rate. Before loading the patterned substrates into the UHV system, the substrates were cleaned by O2 plasma to remove any organic residue induced by dry etching. Followed by rinsing in acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and diluted HF, the substrates were transferred into the MBE chamber for the GeSn growth. After thermal desorption at 450 °C for 15 min, the substrates were in situ cooled down to 150 °C for the GeSn alloy layer growth with a Ge growth rate of 0.5 Å s−1 and a controlled Sn flux as the dopant source. This growth temperature is low enough to efficiently restrain the Sn surface segregation. In order to prevent oxidation, 10 nm Ge cap layer was finally deposited at the same temperature.

After growth, GeSn alloys with a nominal Sn concentration of 4% and 10% will be used for microdisk fabrication. An additional 30-nm-thick polysilicon layer was then deposited on the top of the samples at RT using magnetron sputtering to protect the GeSn layer from the following etching. Then, the sacrificial SiO2 layer was removed using diluted HF (1:1), which also leads to the removal of the overlaying polysilicon layer and the GeSn film deposited on it. As can be seen in Fig. 2, isolated circular GeSn mesas were revealed after the SiO2 layer was removed. However, the periphery of the circular mesa is not so smooth which is bad for optical confine effects. The unexpected situation is caused by the GeSn deposition on the edge of the bottom SiO2 layer which arises from the insufficient lateral etching of the bottom SiO2 and the off-normal angle (30°) deposition. Subsequently, a simple step of selective wet etching undercuts the circular mesas at RT, resulting in suspended GeSn microdisk structures. The selective etchant (APM) comprises of H2O2 (31 wt%), NH4OH (28 wt%), and DI-H2O with a volume ratio of 2:0.5:80 [30]. Finally, the top protective polysilicon layer was removed by KOH. A schematic of the process steps is shown in Fig. 1e–i.

Fig. 2

Top-view SEM image of isolated 5 μm diameter GeSn circular mesas after removal of the shadow mask

In our method to fabricate GeSn microdisks, the final selective wet etching is important due to the different etch rates for the GeSn materials with different Sn concentrations. The etch selectivity of Ge over Ge1−xSnx will also vary with the Sn concentration. The higher the concentration of Sn in GeSn, the higher the surface coverage of SnOy will be developed [33]. It will reduce the wet etching rate of GeSn and lead to a higher etch selectivity of Ge over GeSn. The previous study has reported that the H2O2 based wet etch (H2O2:NH4OH:H2O = 2:0.5:80), the same with this work, achieves an etch selectivity of Ge over Ge0.928Sn0.072 of 9:1 [30].

Results and Discussion

Figure 3a shows the cross-sectional TEM micrograph of the 5 μm diameter GeSn circular mesa without the top polysilicon layer. Figure 3b, c are the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) micrographs for the regions A and B, corresponding to the GeSn/Ge interface and the middle region of the GeSn layer, respectively. The film thickness of the GeSn layer is about 250 nm (Fig. 3a) below the thickness of the shadow mask. As can be seen in Fig. 3b, defects are mainly localized at the GeSn/Ge interface of 30 nm thickness, resulting in the following single-crystal GeSn growth. The HRTEM image of region B shows clear lattice fringes of the GeSn layer, indicating the alloy is highly crystalline and the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) pattern of region B well matches the diffraction pattern of GeSn as shown in Fig. 3c. In addition, to confirm the Sn concentration of GeSn alloy, SIMS measurement was completed as shown in the inset of Fig.3a. The Sn concentration is 9.8 ± 0.5%, in consistent with the nominal value of about 10%. Apart from that, the distribution of Sn atoms is very uniform in the depth profile of the as-grown GeSn film.

Fig. 3

a Cross-sectional TEM image of the 5 μm diameter GeSn circular mesa without top polysilicon layer. Inset: SIMS depth profile of the GeSn layer. b High-resolution TEM image of the GeSn/Ge interface (region A). c High-resolution TEM image for the middle region of the GeSn layer (region B). Inset: FFT pattern of region B

The surface structure of the samples was studied by SEM. Figure 4a shows the top view SEM image of the 5 μm diameter Ge0.96Sn0.04 circular mesas after 510 s selective wet etching by APM solution at RT. It has to be mentioned that the etchants are prepared right before the experiments to avoid the effects of the chemicals aging. The SEM image indicates that not only the Ge substrate but also a part of the GeSn mesa are etched away. The failure to form a disk structure for Ge0.96Sn0.04 alloy is due to the low concentration of Sn which results in the low etch selectivity of Ge over GeSn. In contrast to the Ge0.96Sn0.04 samples, the 5 μm diameter GeSn circular mesa sample with higher Sn concentration of 9.8% was also etched by APM at RT. As shown in Fig. 4b, c. c, microdisk structures were formed successfully for Ge0.902Sn0.098 alloy after 510 s wet etching. Previously, Han et al. [30] reported that they fabricated partly suspended Ge0.928Sn0.072 microdisks (5 μm in dimension) with about 1.2 μm undercut using the H2O2 based wet etching with a selectivity of 7:1. However, after the selective wet etching, the edges of their disk become bent and fractured because of strong attractive capillary forces developed between the suspended structure and the substrate as the etchant liquid is removed, which pulls the released microdisk structure into contact with the substrate [24]. But this phenomenon does not occur in our experiments even prolonging the selective etching to nearly completely remove the underneath Ge pedestal. It could be explained by the higher etch selectivity and the thicker GeSn layer of about 250 nm. Interestingly, the pedestals show unexpected facets with different orientations which may be caused by orientation-dependent lateral etching rate during the selective wet etching process.

Fig. 4

SEM images after selective wet etching. a 5 μm diameter Ge0.96Sn0.04 circular mesas after 510 s etching. b, c 5 μm diameter Ge0.902Sn0.098 circular mesas after 510 s etching

In addition, the microdisks with Ge pedestals of different diameters were fabricated by controlling the selective etching time. Figure 5a shows the diameter of the remaining Ge pedestal as a function of etching time in APM. The error bars represent the standard deviation from the data of five different microdisks in the same sample. The similar line tendency indicates that the etch rate of Ge is roughly equal for Ge0.902Sn0.098 disks with different diameters of 3 μm and 5 μm, and is in agreement with the value of the etch rate from Ref. [30]. Moreover, the minimum diameter of Ge pedestal for standing GeSn microdisk is about 300 nm. The suspended GeSn microdisks will be pulled down by the strong attractive capillary forces if the Ge pedestals became smaller.

Fig. 5

a The diameter of the Ge pedestal as a function of selective wet etching time for 3 μm (green dashed line) and 5 μm (blue dashed line) diameters Ge0.902Sn0.098 disks. b Raman shift line scan measurements performed along the diameter of 5 μm Ge0.902Sn0.098 mesa (green dot) and microdisks with 2 μm diameter Ge pedestal (purple dot) and 300 nm diameter Ge pedestal (blue dot)

In order to investigate the elastic strain distribution of the GeSn microdisks, μ-Raman was performed at RT on 5 μm diameter disks, using a 633 nm laser for excitation with a spot size of about 600 nm. The laser power is only 1% of the maximum power (15 mw) to minimize the thermal effects [34], and the penetration depth of the excitation laser in the GeSn films is approximately 50 nm [26]. The Raman shift was measured by fitting the spectra with Lorentzian functions.

Figure 5b shows the one-dimensional Raman line scans for Ge0.902Sn0.098 microstructures. It is clearly noted (1) for the 5 μm diameter mesa without undercut, the Raman peak associated with the Ge-Ge LO phonon mode shifts unobviously toward lower wavenumbers from the center to the edge of the mesa, and the large Raman shift indicates that there is a large compressive strain in the GeSn mesa; (2) for the 5 μm diameter microdisk with 2 μm diameter Ge pedestal, the Raman peak associated with the Ge-Ge LO phonon mode shifts obviously toward lower wavenumbers from the center to the edge of the disk, revealing a strain gradient due to anchoring to the comparatively large Ge pedestal. And the 5 μm GeSn microdisk with 2 μm diameter pedestal still maintains at its periphery a certain amount of compressive strain; (3) the Ge-Ge peak positions measured along the diameter of the 5 μm Ge0.902Sn0.098 microdisk with 300 nm diameter Ge pedestal remain consistent and have an obvious reduced Raman shift. Therefore, the disks with narrow Ge pedestals (about 300 nm diameter) are expected to be fully relaxed.

In Fig. 6, we present the typical Raman scattering spectrum of 5 μm diameter Ge0.902Sn0.098 microdisk with 300 nm diameter Ge pedestal. For the disks, the Raman spectra show an asymmetric peak at a frequency of 292.4 cm−1 corresponding to the Ge-Ge LO mode. The Raman spectra as recorded for the 5 μm diameter mesa and the reference bulk Ge (001) substrate are also plotted for comparison. Note that after undercutting, clear Raman shift (− 6.3 cm−1) of the Ge-Ge peak can be observed for 9.8% Sn microdisks, since the Raman frequency shift in semiconductor alloys is influenced mainly by strain and composition. Previous Raman studies [33, 35,36,37] have shown that the Raman shift of the Ge-Ge LO phonon mode in GeSn can be expressed as a function of the Sn concentration xSn and the in-plane biaxial strain ε following Eq. (1):

Fig. 6

Comparison of the Raman spectra of the 5 μm Ge0.902Sn0.098 microdisk with 300 nm diameter Ge pedestal, 5 μm Ge0.902Sn0.098 diameter mesa and a bulk Ge substrate as a reference. Inset: enlarged view of the Raman spectra. The Ge-Sn peaks can also be observed around 260 cm−1, and down shift with decreasing the diameter of Ge pedestals

$$ \Delta \omega ={\omega}_{\mathrm{Ge}\mathrm{Sn}}-{\omega}_{\mathrm{Ge}}=\mathrm{A}\cdotp {x}_{\mathrm{Sn}}+\mathrm{B}\cdotp {\varepsilon}_{\parallel } $$

where ωGeSn and ωGe are the peak position of the Ge-Ge LO phonon mode in GeSn and in bulk Ge, respectively, while A and B are coefficients.

The Ge-Ge LO Raman peaks for the mesa and disks show the shift of − 1.4 cm−1 and − 7.7 cm−1 compared with the bulk Ge peak (300.1 cm−1). By taking the coefficients from previous experimental results [37], the value of the in-plane biaxial stain ε is calculated to be − 1.18% for the as-grown GeSn mesa. For the fabricated microdisks, the in-plane biaxial stain ε is approximately equal to 0, confirming the almost completely strain relaxation of the microdisks. According to the recent theoretical calculation of Ge1-xSnx electronic band structure [38], the as-grown Ge0.902Sn0.098 layer is an indirect bandgap material with bandgap energy about 0.56 eV, while the fully relaxed Ge0.902Sn0.098 microdisk is a direct bandgap material with bandgap energy of 0.50 eV.


In conclusion, the GeSn microdisks were successfully fabricated by combining selective epitaxial growth with selective wet etching process. HRTEM and SEM were performed to confirm that the GeSn alloy is highly crystalline and that the GeSn microdisk structure is readily formed by a simple selective wet etching. The μ-Raman measurements reveal that the strain relaxation of GeSn microdisk will be larger with decreasing the diameter of Ge pedestal due to the simultaneously decreasing mechanical constraint from the smaller Ge pedestal. And finally, the high quality and completely strain relaxation GeSn microdisks were achieved by this more cost-effective method. The fabrication process is also a very promising method to achieve smaller GeSn mesa size until lateral quantum size effect is getting important, and to obtain other GeSn nanostructures such as GeSn quantum dots, GeSn nanomesh, and GeSn nanowires for future Si-compatible photonic and electronic device applications.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data that support the findings of this work are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Ammonia peroxide mixture (wet etchant)


Fast Fourier transformation


High-resolution transmission electron microscopy


Molecular beam epitaxy


Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition


Room temperature


Scanning electron microscopy


Secondary ion mass spectrometry


Micro-Raman spectroscopy


  1. 1.

    Chibane Y, Ferhat M (2010) Electronic structure of SnxGe1−x alloys for small Sn compositions: Unusual structural and electronic properties. J Appl Phys 107:053512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Low KL, Yang Y, Han G, Fan W, Yeo Y-C (2012) Electronic band structure and effective mass parameters of Ge1-xSnx alloys. J Appl Phys 112:103715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yin W-J, Gong X-G, Wei S-H (2008) Origin of the unusually large band-gap bowing and the breakdown of the band-edge distribution rule in theSnxGe1−xalloys. Phys Rev B 78:161203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gupta S, Magyari-Köpe B, Nishi Y, Saraswat KC (2013) Achieving direct band gap in germanium through integration of Sn alloying and external strain. J Appl Phys 113:073707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Polak MP, Scharoch P, Kudrawiec R (2017) The electronic band structure of Ge1−xSnxin the full composition range: indirect, direct, and inverted gaps regimes, band offsets, and the Burstein–Moss effect. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:195103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mathews J, Beeler RT, Tolle J, Xu C, Roucka R, Kouvetakis J, Menéndez J (2010) Direct-gap photoluminescence with tunable emission wavelength in Ge1−ySny alloys on silicon. Appl Phys Lett 97:221912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen R, Lin H, Huo Y, Hitzman C, Kamins TI, Harris JS (2011) Increased photoluminescence of strain-reduced, high-Sn composition Ge1−xSnx alloys grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 99:181125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Grzybowski G, Beeler RT, Jiang L, Smith DJ, Kouvetakis J, Menéndez J (2012) Next generation of Ge1−ySny (y = 0.01-0.09) alloys grown on Si(100) via Ge3H8 and SnD4: Reaction kinetics and tunable emission. Appl Phys Lett 101:072105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Olesinski RW, Abbaschian GJ (1984) The Ge−Sn (Germanium−Tin) system. Bull Alloy Phase Diagr 5:265–271

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fleurial JP (1990) Si-Ge-Metal Ternary Phase Diagram Calculations. J Electrochem Soc 137:2928

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang W, Zhou Q, Dong Y, Tok ES, Yeo Y-C (2015) Critical thickness for strain relaxation of Ge1−xSnx (x ≤ 0.17) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on Ge(001). Appl Phys Lett 106:232106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hickey R, Fernando N, Zollner S, Hart J, Hazbun R, Kolodzey J (2017) Properties of pseudomorphic and relaxed germanium1−xtinx alloys (x < 0.185) grown by MBE. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 35:021205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang ZP, Song YX, Zhu ZYS, Han Y, Chen QM, Li YY, Zhang LY, Wang SM (2017) Structural properties of GeSn thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. AIP Adv 7:045211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cong H, Yang F, Xue C, Yu K, Zhou L, Wang N, Cheng B, Wang Q (2018) Multilayer Graphene-GeSn Quantum Well Heterostructure SWIR Light Source. Small 14:1704414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang B-J, Chang C-Y, Hsieh Y-D, Soref RA, Sun G, Cheng H-H, Chang G-E (2019) Electrically Injected GeSn Vertical-Cavity Surface Emitters on Silicon-on-Insulator Platforms. ACS Photonics 6:1931–1938

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen R, Gupta S, Huang YC, Huo Y, Rudy CW, Sanchez E, Kim Y, Kamins TI, Saraswat KC, Harris JS (2014) Demonstration of a Ge/GeSn/Ge quantum-well microdisk resonator on silicon: enabling high-quality Ge(Sn) materials for micro- and nanophotonics. Nano Lett 14:37–43

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wirths S, Geiger R, von den Driesch N, Mussler G, Stoica T, Mantl S, Ikonic Z, Luysberg M, Chiussi S, Hartmann JM, Sigg H, Faist J, Buca D, Grützmacher D (2015) Lasing in direct-bandgap GeSn alloy grown on Si. Nat Photonics 9:88–92

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wallace PM, Senaratne CL, Xu C, Sims PE, Kouvetakis J, Menéndez J (2017) Molecular epitaxy of pseudomorphic Ge1−ySny(y= 0.06–0.17) structures and devices on Si/Ge at ultra-low temperatures via reactions of Ge4H10and SnD4. Semicond Sci Technol 32:025003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aubin J, Hartmann JM, Gassenq A, Rouviere JL, Robin E, Delaye V, Cooper D, Mollard N, Reboud V, Calvo V (2017) Growth and structural properties of step-graded, high Sn content GeSn layers on Ge. Semicond Sci Technol 32:094006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhou Y, Dou W, Wei D, Ojo S, Tran H, Ghetmiri SA, Liu J, Sun G, Soref R, Margetis J, Tolle J, Li B, Chen Z, Mortazavi M, Yu S-Q (2019) Optically Pumped GeSn Lasers Operating at 270 K with Broad Waveguide Structures on Si. ACS Photonics 6:1434–1441

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lieten RR, Seo JW, Decoster S, Vantomme A, Peters S, Bustillo KC, Haller EE, Menghini M, Locquet JP (2013) Tensile strained GeSn on Si by solid phase epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 102:052106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sadoh T, Ooato A, Park J-H, Miyao M (2016) High Sn-concentration (~8%) GeSn by low-temperature (~150°C) solid-phase epitaxy of a-GeSn/c-Ge. Thin Solid Films 602:20–23

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tonkikh AA, Eisenschmidt C, Talalaev VG, Zakharov ND, Schilling J, Schmidt G, Werner P (2013) Pseudomorphic GeSn/Ge(001) quantum wells: Examining indirect band gap bowing. Appl Phys Lett 103:032106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gupta S, Chen R, Huang YC, Kim Y, Sanchez E, Harris JS, Saraswat KC (2013) Highly selective dry etching of germanium over germanium-tin (Ge1-xSnx): a novel route for Ge1-xSnx nanostructure fabrication. Nano Lett 13:3783–3790

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Stange D, Wirths S, Geiger R, Schulte-Braucks C, Marzban B, von den Driesch N, Mussler G, Zabel T, Stoica T, Hartmann J-M, Mantl S, Ikonic Z, Grützmacher D, Sigg H, Witzens J, Buca D (2016) Optically Pumped GeSn Microdisk Lasers on Si. ACS Photonics 3:1279–1285

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fenrich CS, Chen X, Chen R, Huang Y-C, Chung H, Kao M-Y, Huo Y, Kamins TI, Harris JS (2016) Strained pseudomorphic Ge1–xSnx multiple quantum well microdisk using SiNy stressor layer. ACS Photonics 3:2231–2236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Reboud V, Gassenq A, Pauc N, Aubin J, Milord L, Thai QM, Bertrand M, Guilloy K, Rouchon D, Rothman J, Zabel T, Armand Pilon F, Sigg H, Chelnokov A, Hartmann JM, Calvo V (2017) Optically pumped GeSn micro-disks with 16% Sn lasing at 3.1 μm up to 180 K. Appl Phys Lett 111:092101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Stange D, von den Driesch N, Zabel T, Armand-Pilon F, Rainko D, Marzban B, Zaumseil P, Hartmann J-M, Ikonic Z, Capellini G, Mantl S, Sigg H, Witzens J, Grützmacher D, Buca D (2018) GeSn/SiGeSn Heterostructure and Multi Quantum Well Lasers. ACS Photonics 5:4628–4636

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Han Y, Song Y, Chen X, Zhang Z, Liu J, Li Y, Zhu Z, Huang H, Shao J, Wang S (2018) Abnormal strain in suspended GeSn microstructures. Materials Research Express 5:035901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Han Y, Li Y, Song Y, Chi C, Zhang Z, Liu J, Zhu Z, Wang S (2018) A comparative study of selective dry and wet etching of germanium–tin (Ge1−xSnx) on germanium. Semicond Sci Technol 33:085011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ponath P, Posadas A, Schmidt M, Kelleher A-M, White M, O'Connell D, Hurley PK, Duffy R, Demkov AA (2018) Monolithic integration of patterned BaTiO3 thin films on Ge wafers. J Vac Sci Technol B 36:031206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu T, Wang L, Zhu G, Hu X, Dong Z, Zhong Z, Jia Q, Yang X, Jiang Z (2018) Dislocation-related photoluminescence of GeSn films grown on Ge (001) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. Semicond Sci Technol 33:125022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cheng R, Wang W, Gong X, Sun L, Guo P, Hu H, Shen Z, Han G, Yeo Y-C (2013) Relaxed and Strained Patterned Germanium-Tin Structures: A Raman Scattering Study. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 2:P138–P145

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Suess MJ, Minamisawa RA, Geiger R, Bourdelle KK, Sigg H, Spolenak R (2014) Power-dependent Raman analysis of highly strained Si nanobridges. Nano Lett 14:1249–1254

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    D’Costa VR, Tolle J, Roucka R, Poweleit CD, Kouvetakis J, Menéndez J (2007) Raman scattering in Ge1−ySny alloys. Solid State Commun 144:240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Han D, Ye H, Song Y, Zhu Z, Yang Y, Yu Z, Liu Y, Wang S, Di Z (2019) Analysis of Raman scattering from inclined GeSn/Ge dual-nanowire heterostructure on Ge(1 1 1) substrate. Appl Surf Sci 463:581–586

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lin H, Chen R, Huo Y, Kamins TI, Harris JS (2011) Raman study of strained Ge1−xSnx alloys. Appl Phys Lett 98:261917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rainko D, Ikonic Z, Elbaz A, von den Driesch N, Stange D, Herth E, Boucaud P, El Kurdi M, Grutzmacher D, Buca D (2019) Impact of tensile strain on low Sn content GeSn lasing. Sci Rep 9:259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Yongliang Fan, Xiaofeng Hu, Jie Wang, Lijian Zhang, Hengliang Wang, Hongtao Xu, and Liping Zhu for their help in the structure fabrication. Part of the sample fabrication was performed at Fudan Nano-fabrication Laboratory.


This work is supported by The Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (no. 61674039), The Science and Technology on Analog Integrated Circuit Laboratory of China (no. 6142802180206), and The Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (no. 17ZR1402600).

Author information




ZMJ and LMW contributed to the idea of the project. GJZ designed and carried out the experiments. TL helped to analyze the results of the micro-Raman characterization. GJZ wrote and submit this manuscript. ZYZ and XJY participated in the analyses of the results and discussion of this work. ZMJ and LMW revised the manuscript and corrected the English. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liming Wang or Zuimin Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, G., Liu, T., Zhong, Z. et al. Fabrication of High-Quality and Strain-Relaxed GeSn Microdisks by Integrating Selective Epitaxial Growth and Selective Wet Etching Methods. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 18 (2020).

Download citation


  • GeSn microdisk
  • Molecular beam epitaxy
  • Selective wet etching
  • Micro-Raman spectroscopy
  • Strain relaxation