Skip to main content

Surface Proton Conduction of Sm-Doped CeO2-δ Thin Film Preferentially Grown on Al2O3 (0001)


Sm-doped CeO2-δ (Ce0.9Sm0.1O2-δ; SDC) thin films were prepared on Al2O3 (0001) substrates by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. The prepared thin films were preferentially grown along the [111] direction, with the spacing of the (111) plane (d111) expanded by 2.6% to compensate for a lattice mismatch against the substrate. The wet-annealed SDC thin film, with the reduced d111 value, exhibited surface protonic conduction in the low-temperature region below 100 °C. The O1s photoemission spectrum exhibits H2O and OH peaks on the SDC surface. These results indicate the presence of physisorbed water layers and the generation of protons on the SDC (111) surface with oxygen vacancies. The protons generated on the SDC surface were conducted through a physisorbed water layer by the Grotthuss mechanism.


Fluorite-type CeO2-δ oxides are good solid electrolyte candidates for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) due to their high oxygen ion conductivity in high-temperature (HT) regions above 800 °C [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In particular, the oxygen ion conduction of CeO2-δ bulk crystal can be tuned by substituting trivalent rare-earth cations [7,8,9], while small electron conduction also prevails under low-oxygen potential conditions owing to the formation of hopping electrons on cation sites through the propagation of oxygen nonstoichiometry [10,11,12,13].

Recently, high proton conductivity was observed for porous and nanocrystalline CeO2-δ and Y-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ) below 100 °C, including the room temperature region [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Although the detailed mechanism is still an open question, such conduction is believed to result from the surface adsorption of water molecules. Protons are generated by adsorbed water molecules and conducted through adsorbed water layers. This means that a large surface area is crucial to increase the proton conduction. When considering practical devices, thin film forms are more suitable than porous or nanocrystalline forms. Proton conducting CeO2 thin films may be applied to many types of electrochemical devices, such as electric double-layer transistors (EDLTs), which operate based on EDL-induced carrier doping [26,27,28,29,30]. While surface proton conduction has already been found in both pure and doped CeO2 ceramics and thin films [18,19,20,21,22], the proton conductivity was not sufficiently high for practical applications.

In this study, in order to improve CeO2 thin film surface proton conductivity, we prepared a preferentially oriented Sm-doped CeO2 (SDC) thin film on an Al2O3 (0001) substrate and investigated its surface proton conductivity.


Preparation of SDC Thin Film

A 10-mol% Sm-doped CeO2 ceramic target was synthesized by a solid-state reaction method. CeO2 (99.9%, Furuuchi Chem. Coop.) and Sm2O3 (99.99%, Furuuchi Chem. Coop.) powders were ball-milled for 24 h, after which the mixture was pressed into a disk shape at 50 MPa and sintered in air at 1250 °C for 6 h. The SDC thin films were deposited on Al2O3 (0001) substrates by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering using a ceramic target. The RF magnetron sputtering system was arranged in a symmetric configuration, with a rotating substrate holder for compositional uniformity, and was kept at a base pressure of 2.0 × 10−7 Torr. The distance between the target and the substrates was 70 mm. The ceramic target RF power and the Ar gas flow rate were set at 50 W and 30 sccm, respectively. The deposition pressure and the substrate temperature were fixed at 8.0 × 10−3 Torr and 700 °C, respectively. The SDC thin film was annealed in a wet atmosphere (Ar:O2 = 4:1, p(H2O) = 2.3 kPa) at 500 °C for 1 h. From the Ce 3d, Sm3d, and O1s core level photoemission spectroscopy (PES) spectra, the composition of the SDC thin film was calculated to be Ce0.858Sm0.142O1.912.

Characterizations of the Crystalline and Conductivity

The crystalline quality of the thin films was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with CuKα using a Rigaku Miniflex 600. The electrical conductivities were characterized by the AC impedance method, using a frequency response analyzer (Solartron 1260) and an amplifier (Solartron 1296), in a temperature region in dry air (Ar:O2 = 4:1) and wet air (Ar:O2 = 4:1, p(H2O) = 2.3 kPa). To measure the in-plane electrical conductivity, a ~ 100-nm-thick interdigital Ag electrode was deposited on the film surface through a metal shadow mask by sputtering. The area of the thin film was 8.0 × 8.0 mm2. The length and width of the conducting path were 45.0 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively [15]. The conducting carrier was estimated from the electrical conductivity against the PO2 (not shown). The measurement of the electrical conductivity frequency region was changed from 32 to 100 MHz. The conductivity value at each temperature was carefully calculated by taking the resistance, the conductivity path, and a cross-section area of the thin film.

Characterization of the Electronic Structure

The electronic structures were measured by photoemission spectroscopy (PES) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The spectroscopic measurements were conducted at the KEK Photon Factory BL-2A MUSASHI undulator beamline [31]. The XAS spectrum was recorded in a total electron yield mode. PES spectra were acquired using a VG-Scienta SES-2002 hemispherical analyzer. The PES and XAS resolutions were set at approximately 100 and 80 meV, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the SDC ceramic, as-deposited and wet-annealed SDC thin films. The SDC ceramic target was polycrystalline, and the thin film was preferentially grown along the [111] direction. For this study, we prepared a nanocrystalline SDC ceramic which, while exhibiting admittedly poor crystallinity, did exhibit sufficient proton conductivity to allow us to discuss the differences between the SDC ceramic and thin film. The positions of the 111 peak of the SDC ceramic and as-deposited thin film are at ~ 29.02° and ~ 28.31°, and the calculated spacing of the (111) plane (d111) is 3.070 and 3.151 Å, respectively. The d111 of the thin film was expanded by 2.6% from that of the ceramic target, so as to compensate for the lattice mismatch between SDC and Al2O3. In addition, at 3.091 Å, the d111 of the wet-annealed thin film was 1.9% less than that of the as-deposited thin film. This shrinkage of d111 is due to the chemical absorption of water molecules by oxygen vacancies through wet annealing, as in the following reaction [32]:

$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{O}}^{\bullet \bullet }+\frac{1}{2}{\mathrm{O}}_2\to 2{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}^{\bullet } $$
Fig. 1

XRD patterns of the as-deposited, wet-annealed SDC thin films and SDC ceramic. The two solid vertical lines are the CeO2 (111) and (200) planes

A weak wet annealing peak, at ~ 38.0°, is assigned to the 111 peak of the Ag electrode used for the conductivity measurement.

Figure 2a shows the Ce 3d5/2 XAS spectrum of the dry SDC thin film. The Ce 3d5/2 spectrum corresponds to the transition from the Ce 3d5/2 core level to the unoccupied Ce 4f states. The overall shape and peak position of the thin film were in good agreement with those of the CeO2 thin film [3, 4, 33]. Using Gaussian fitting, the peak positions of on-1 and on-2 indicated in the spectrum were estimated to be Ce3+ and the peak positions of on-3 was estimated to be Ce4+. This result indicates that the SDC thin film has mixed valence states of Ce4+ and Ce3+. There was no significant difference in the spectrum shapes between the dry- and wet-annealed thin films, indicating that the resolution of the XAS method is not sufficient to detect the effect of proton insertion on the electronic structure. Therefore, as shown in the next section, we applied the resonant PES method to the SDC thin films, which method has significantly better resolution.

Fig. 2

a Ce 3d XAS spectrum of the as-deposited SDC thin film. The labels on-1, on-2, and on-3 indicate the excitation energies for the resonant PES measurements. b Resonant PES spectra of the as-deposited and wet-annealed SDC thin films measured at on-1, on-2, and on-3 in a. The green and blue curves are the Ce3+ and Ce4+ states, respectively, obtained from Gaussian fitting

Figure 2b shows the resonant PES spectra of the as-deposited and wet-annealed SDC thin films, measured at photon energies indicated by on-1, on-2, and on-3 in Fig. 2a. The PES spectra examined in this study reflect the surface electronic structure, since the mean free path of a photoelectron is less than 2 nm [34]. The intensities of these spectra were normalized by the acquisition times and beam current. The spectral intensities are resonantly enhanced at on-1, on-2, and on-3. The PES spectra are explained as follows: (i) the resonant PES spectra measured at on-1 and on-2 have peaks at a binding energy of ~ 2.0 eV, which corresponds to the Ce3+ state (3d94f1L) hybridized with the O 2p state. Here, L is ligand hole in the O 2p state; (ii) the spectra measured at on-3 has a peak at a binding energy of ~ 4.3 eV, which corresponds to the Ce4+ state (3d94f0) hybridized with the O 2p state. In the as-deposited thin film, the abundance ratio of Ce4+ at ~ 4.3 eV and Ce3+ at ~ 2.0 eV is estimated to be 88:12. This result provides additional evidence for the mixed-valence states of Ce4+ and Ce3+, as shown in Fig. 2a. The peak intensity of Ce3+ at ~ 2.0 eV is lower in the wet-annealed thin film, indicating that the oxygen vacancies are occupied by oxygen ions in a wet atmosphere.

Figure 3 shows the Arrhenius plots of the electrical conductivities of the SDC thin films and bulk ceramics measured in dry and wet atmospheres. In the dry atmosphere, the SDC thin film and bulk ceramic exhibit Arrhenius-type thermal activation behaviors over the whole temperature range. The activation energies (EA) of the thin film and bulk ceramic are 0.70 and 1.1 eV, respectively. The conductivity of the polycrystalline SDC ceramic was two orders of magnitude lower than that of the SDC thin film, due to the influence of grain boundaries. The same activation energy and similar conductivity have been reported for Gd-doped CeO2 polycrystals and thin films [4, 18].

Fig. 3

Arrhenius plots of the electrical conductivities in the in-plane of the SDC thin films and bulk ceramics, measured in dry and wet atmospheres

In contrast, due to the proton migration, the conductivities of the thin film and the bulk ceramic measured in a wet atmosphere gradually increase as the temperature decreases to below 100 and 250 °C, respectively. In particular, the increase in the conductivity ratio was more marked in the thin film. Single crystals and micropolycrystalline CeO2 do not exhibit proton conductivity, but since such proton conduction is caused by absorbed protons at the surface, nanopolycrystals and porous CeO2 do exhibit proton conductivity [19, 20].

In general, the room temperature surface proton conduction of fluorine-type oxides such as CeO2 or YSZ is explained by the Grotthuss mechanism [14,15,16,17,18]. According to this mechanism, physisorbed H2O forms OH and H3O+ ions on the surface at room temperature and the H3O+ proton transfers from one H2O molecule to a neighboring H2O molecule, as in the following reaction:

$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}^{+}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}^{+} $$

Similar behavior was observed in the CeO2 and YSZ thin films and bulk ceramic [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

The dependence of relative humidity on the resistivity of the wet-annealed SDC thin film, at room temperature, is shown in Fig. 4a. The resistivity decreased greatly as the relative humidity increased and decreased by three orders of magnitude when the humidity was increased from 50RH% to 100RH%. The dramatic increase in the conductivity of the SDC thin film at room temperature, as shown in Fig. 3, is due to the increase in physisorbed water on the SDC surface as the relative humidity increases. The red plot shows the resistivity of dry-annealed SDC thin film measured in a 100RH% wet atmosphere at 22 °C, which resistivity was two orders of magnitude higher than that of the wet-annealed SDC thin film. This indicates that the proton absorption at the SDC surface, by wet-annealing, increases the surface proton conductivity. Figure 4(b) show the Cole-Cole plot of the wet-annealed thin film measured at 22°C. The spectrum is shown in order to distinguish the bulk resistance and electrode interface resistance at the low temperature region shown in Fig. 3. The wet-annealed thin film exhibits one semicircle and the tail of a second semicircle, indicating that the conducting carrier is surface conducting protons. Figure 5 shows the O 1s PES spectra of the dry- and the wet-annealed thin films. Both exhibited a double-peak structure and a sharp peak at ~529.5 eV, which corresponds to O2- in oxygen sites. On the other hand, the positions of the weaker peaks are different, and can be interpreted as follows: (i) the broad peak at ~532 eV in the as-deposited thin film corresponds to the OH- absorbed at the surface created by chemisorbed water.; and (ii) the peak at 533 eV in the wet-annealed thin film corresponds to H2O molecules physisorbed at the surface [35]. The same peak structures have been reported in YSZ thin film with surface proton conduction at room temperature [15, 36]. The peak ratio of physisorbed H2O was increased from 7.8% to 24% by wet-annealing. Thus, the increase in conductivity by wet-annealing, shown in Fig. 4, reflects an increase in the physically adsorbed water molecules at the SDC surface. A proton conductivity of 5.98×10-5 S⁄cm was achieved at room temperature in the preferentially oriented thin film, which is two orders of magnitude higher than that of polycrystalline ceramics. Such conductivity is applicable to practical devices [26,27,28,29,30]. Most notable was the ~10-2 S/cm proton conductivity exhibited in a high humidity atmosphere, as shown in Fig. 4(a), which is considerably higher than the highest proton conductivities reported so far; approximately ~10-4 S/cm for Gd-doped CeO2 thin films [19] and ~10-6 S/cm for Gd-doped CeO2 polycrystals [18]. Such high proton conductivity is considered to derive from two features of the preferentially oriented SDC thin film with oxygen vacancy. The first feature is high water adsorbability on the SDC (111) surface. In the O1s PES spectrum, 16.9% of the detected oxygen was attributed to chemically adsorbed water and 24% was attributed to physically adsorbed water. This means that there are layers of physisorbed water on the SDC surface that can acts as proton conducting paths. The second feature is the dissociation of adsorbed water at the SDC (111) surface. The reduced CeO2-δ(111) surface promotes the dissociation of water molecules and the formation OH- and H+, which contribute to proton conduction [37, 38]. Dissociated protons can migrate through a physically adsorbed water layer by the Grotthus-mechanism. Therefore, the preferentially oriented SDC thin film contributed to such high proton conduction.

Fig. 4

a The relative humidity dependence of the wet-annealed SDC thin film and b Cole-Cole plots of the wet-annealed SDC thin film, measured in 100 RH% wet air at 22 °C

Fig. 5

PES spectra of the O 1s core level of dry- and wet-annealed thin films. The blue, green, and yellow curves are the O2− in the lattice site, and OH and H2O on the surface, respectively, obtained from Gaussian fitting


We have studied the surface proton conduction of SDC thin films prepared by RF magnetron sputtering. The prepared SDC thin film was preferentially oriented in the [111] direction, and the surface of the film was reduced by Sm doping. From the Ce 3d, Sm3d, and O1s core level PES spectra, the composition of the SDC thin film was calculated to be Ce0.858Sm0.142O1.912.

The conductivity of the thin film is higher than that of bulk ceramic due to its preferential orientation, which is not affected strongly by grain boundaries. Due to water condensation on the SDC surface, the proton conductivity of the wet-annealed SDC thin film increases as the temperature is decreased to below 100 °C, although it exhibits oxygen ion conduction above 100 °C.

A high proton conductivity of ~ 10−2 S/cm was achieved in a high-humidity atmosphere, at room temperature. This is due to the characteristics of the preferentially oriented SDC thin film with oxygen vacancies. The presence of physisorbed water layers on the SDC surface, indicated by the O1s PES spectrum, acted as a proton-conducting path by the Grotthuss mechanism. The SDC (111) surface with oxygen vacancy promoted water dissociation and the formation of protons. Generated protons on the SDC (111) surface were conducted through the physisorbed water layer, and a high proton conductivity was achieved.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author by request.


d 111 :

Spacing of the (111) plane

E A :

Activation energy


Electric double layer


Electric double-layer transistor

E g :

Energy gap


Photoemission spectroscopy


Radio frequency


Relative humidity


Sm-doped CeO2-δ


Solid oxide fuel cell


X-ray absorption spectroscopy


X-ray diffraction


Y-stabilized ZrO2


  1. 1.

    Nigara Y, Yashiro K, Kawada T, Mizusaki J (2001) The atomic hydrogen permeability in (CeO2)0.85(CaO)0.15 at high temperatures. Solid State Ionics 145:365

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yahiro H, Eguchi K, Arai H (1989) Electrical properties and reducibilities of ceria-rare earth oxide systems and their application to solid oxide fuel cell. Solid State Ionics 36:71

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yamaguchi S, Tasaki Y, Kobayashi M, Horiba K, Kumigashira H, Higuchi T (2015) Electronic structure and oxygen ion conductivity of as-deposited Ce0.90Sm0.10O2-δ thin film prepared by RF magnetron sputtering. Jpn J Appl Phys 54:06FJ04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Göbel MC, Gregori G, Guo X, Maier J (2010) Boundary effects on the electrical conductivity of pure and doped cerium oxide thin films. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:14351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Simner SP, Shelton JP, Anderson MD, Stevenson JW (2003) Interaction between La (Sr)FeO3 SOFC cathode and YSZ electrolyte. Solid State Ionics 161:11

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jung S, Lu C, He H, Ahn K, Gorte RJ, Vohs JM (2006) Influence of composition and Cu impregnation method on the performance of Cu/CeO2/YSZ SOFC anodes. J. Power sources 154:42

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shim JH, Chao CC, Huang H, Prinz FB (2007) Atomic layer deposition of yttria-stabilized zirconia for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Mater 19:3850

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Eguchi K, Setoguchi T, Inoue T, Arai H (1992) Electrical properties of ceria-based oxides and their application to solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 52:165

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang S, Kobayashi T, Dokiya M, Hashimoto T (2000) Electrical and ionic conductivity of Gd-doped ceria. J Electrochem Soc 147:3606

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yashiro K, Onuma S, Kaimai A, Nigara Y, Kawada T, Mizusaki J, Kawamura K, Horita T, Yokokawa H (2002) Mass transport properties of Ce0.9Gd0.1O2−δ at the surface and in the bulk. Solid State Ionics 152:469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Blumenthal RN, Panlener RJ (1970) Electron mobility in nonstoichiometric cerium dioxide at high temperatures. J Phys Chem Solids 31:1190

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang S, Inaba H, Tagawa H, Dokiya M, Hashimoto T (1998) Nonstoichiometry of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x. Solid State Ionics 107:73

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mogensen M, Sammes NM, Tompsett GA (2000) Physical, chemical and electrochemical properties of pure and doped ceria. Solid State Ionics 129:63

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Raz S, Sasaki K, Maier J, Riess I (2000) Characterization of absorbed water layers on Y2O3-doped ZrO2. Solid State Ionics 143:181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Takayanagi M, Tsuchiya T, Kawamura K, Minohara M, Horiba K, Kumigashira H, Higuchi T (2017) Thickness-dependent surface proton conduction in (111) oriented yttria-stabilized zirconia thin film. Solid State Ionics 311:46

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Scherrer B, Schlupp MVF, Stender D, Martynczuk J, Grolig JG, Ma H, Kocher P, Lippert T, Prestat M, Gauckler LJ (2013) On proton conductivity in porous and dense yttria stabilized zirconia at low temperature. Adv Funct Mater 23:1957

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Etoh D, Tsuchiya T, Takayanagi M, Higuchi T, Terabe K (2019) Oxide ion and proton conduction controlled in nano-grained yttria stabilized ZrO2 thin films prepared by pulse laser deposition. Jpn J Appl Phys 58:SDDG01

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gregori G, Shirpour M, Maier J (2013) Proton conduction in dense and porous nanocrystalline ceria thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23:5861

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Avila-Paredes HJ, Chen C-T, Wang S, De Souza RA, Martin M, Munir Z, Kim S (2010) Grain boundaries in dense nanocrystalline ceria ceramics: exclusive pathways for proton conduction at room temperature. J Mater Chem 20:10110

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shirpour M, Gregori G, Merkle R, Maier J (2011) On the proton conductivity in pure and gadolinium doped nanocrystalline cerium oxide. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:937

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Oh TS, Boyd DA, Goodwin DG, Haile SM (2013) Proton conductivity of columnar ceria thin-films grown by chemical vapor deposition. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:2466

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Runnerstrom EL, Ong GK, Gregori G, Maier J, Milliron DJ (2018) Colloidal nanocrystal films reveal the mechanism for intermediate temperature proton conductivity in porous ceramics. J Phys Chem C 122:13624

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim S, Avila Paredes HJ, Wang S, Chen CT, Souza RAD, Martin M, Munir ZA (2009) On the conduction pathway for protons in nanocrystalline yttria-stabilized zirconia. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:3035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jiang J, Hertz JL (2014) Intermediate temperature surface proton conduction on dense YSZ thin films. J Mater Chem A 2:19550

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Takayanagi M, Furuichi S, Namiki W, Tsuchiya T, Minohara M, Kobayashi M, Horiba K, Kumigashira H, Higuchi T (2017) Proton conduction on YSZ electrolyte thin films prepared by RF magnetron sputtering. ECS Transactions 75:115

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tsuchiya T, Ochi M, Higuchi T, Terabe K, Aono M (2015) Effect of ionic conductivity on response speed of SrTiO3-based all-solid-state electric-double-layer transistor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:12254

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tsuchiya T, Terabe K, Aono M (2014) Micro X-ray photoemission and Raman spectroscopic studies on bandgap tuning of graphene oxide achieved by solid state ionics device. Appl Phys Lett 105:183101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tsuchiya T, Tsuruoka T, Kim SJ, Terabe K, Aono M (2018) Ionic decision-maker created as novel, solid-state devices. Sci Adv 4:eaau2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tsuchiya T, Terabe K, Aono M (2014) In situ and non-volatile bandgap tuning of multilayer graphene oxide in an all-solid-state electric double-layer transistor. Adv Mater 26:1087

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Takayanagi M, Tsuchiya T, Namiki W, Higuchi T, Terabe K (2018) Correlated Metal SrVO3 based all-solid-state redox transistors achieved by Li+ or H+ transport. J Phys Soc Jpn 87:034802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Horiba K, Ohguchi H, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Ono K, Nakagawa N, Lippmaa M, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H (2003) A high-resolution synchrotron-radiation angle-resolved photoemission spectrometer with in situ oxide thin film growth capability. Rev Sci Instrum 74:3406

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Choudhury B, Chetri P, Choudhury A (2015) Annealing temperature and oxygen-vacancy-dependent variation of lattice strain, band gap and luminescence properties of CeO2 nanoparticles. J Exp Nanosci 12(2):103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gulyaev RV, Stadnichenko AI, Slavinskaya EM, Ivanova AS, Koscheev SV, Boronin AI (2012) In situ preparation and investigation of Pd/CeO2 catalysts for the low-temperature oxidation of CO. Appl Catal A: Gen 439-440:41

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tanuma S, Powell CJ, Penn DR (2003) Calculation of electron inelastic mean free paths (IMFPs) VII. Reliability of the TPP-2 M IMFP predictive equation. Surf Interface Anal 35:268–275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ling F, Yu Y, Zhou W, Xua X, Zhu Z (2015) Highly defective CeO2 as a promoter for efficient and stable water oxidation. J Mater Chem A 3:634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Takayanagi M, Tsuchiya T, Minohara M, Kobayashi M, Horiba K, Kumigashira H, Higuchi T (2017) Surface electronic structure of proton-doped YSZ thin film by soft-X-ray photoemission spectroscopy. Trans Mat ResSoc Jpn 42:61

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Watkins MB, Foster AS, Shluger AL (2007) Hydrogen cycle on CeO2(111) surfaces: density functional theory calculations. J Phys Chem C 111:15337

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mullins DR, Albrecht PM, Chen TL, Calaza FC, Biegalski MD, Christen HM, Overbury SH (2012) Water dissociation on CeO2(100) and CeO2(111) thin films. J Phys Chem C 116:19419

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant No. 16H02115) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the MEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center. The work at KEK was done under the approval of the Program Advisory Committee (Proposal Nos. 2018S2-004 and 2018G009) at the Institute of Materials Structure Science, KEK.


This work was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant No. 16H02115) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the MEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center.

Author information




TH and DN proposed the research work. DN, WN, MT, KK, and TF did the experiment. RY, KH, and HK technically supported the PES measurement. DN and TT wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Nishioka.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishioka, D., Tsuchiya, T., Namiki, W. et al. Surface Proton Conduction of Sm-Doped CeO2-δ Thin Film Preferentially Grown on Al2O3 (0001). Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 42 (2020).

Download citation


  • Sm-doped CeO2 (SDC)
  • Thin film
  • Mixed valence state
  • Surface proton conduction
  • O–H bond