 Nano Express
 Open Access
 Published:
ElectricControlled Valley Pseudomagnetoresistance in Graphene with YShaped Kekulé Lattice Distortion
Nanoscale Research Letters volume 15, Article number: 46 (2020)
Abstract
We propose a new method for regulating valley pseudomagnetoresistance in ballistic graphenebased valley fieldeffect transistors by taking into account the Yshaped Kekulé lattice distortion and electric barrier. The device involves valley injection and valley detection by ferromagneticstrain source and drain. The valley manipulation in the channel is achieved via the Yshaped Kekulé lattice distortion and electric barrier. The central mechanism of these devices lies on Yshaped Kekulé lattice distortion in graphene can induce a valley precession, thus controlling the valley orientation of channel electrons and hence the current collected at the drain. We found that the tuning external bias voltage makes the valley pseudomagnetoresistance oscillate between positive and negative values and colossal tunneling valley pseudomagnetoresistance of over 30,000% can be achieved. Our results suggest that the synergy of valleytronics and digital logics may provide new paradigms for valleytronicbased information processing and reversible computing.
Introduction
Graphene, being a twodimensional sheet of carbon atoms, which have excellent carrier mobility and offers the thinnest possible channel for utilizing to design of metaloxidesemiconductor fieldeffect transistors [1]. Semenov have proposed a spin fieldeffect transistor by utilizing a graphene layer as the channel [2], which involves spin injection and spin detection by ferromagnetic source and drain, and the spin manipulation in the channel is achieved via electrical control of the electron exchange interaction with a ferromagnetic gate. In addition, Rashba spinorbit interaction is another promising tool for the spin control in graphene [3]. The Rashba spinorbit interaction can induces a spin precession, thus controlling the spin orientation of channel electrons. The spin fieldeffect transistors also inspired many important research ideas, such as giant magnetoresistance and tunnel magnetoresistance [3, 4]. The giant magnetoresistance and tunnel magnetoresistance can be applied in digital storage and magnetic sensor technologies.
On the other hand, Dirac electrons in graphene possess extra valley degree of freedom besides the conventional charge and spin counterparts. Owing to the large momentum difference between the two valleys and the suppression of the intervalley scattering in clean graphene samples [5–7], the valley degree of freedom is believed to exert the same effect as the electron spin in carrying and manipulating information, which leads to a new discipline rising as valleytronics. In analog of spin fieldeffect transistor, valley fieldeffect transistor is also theoretically proposed in graphene [8], which consists of a quantum one dimension channel of gapped graphene sandwiched between two armchair graphene nanoribbons (source and drain); then, side gate electric field is applied to the channel and modulates the valley polarization of carriers due to the valleyorbit interaction, thus controlling the amount of current collected at the drain. However, due to the fact that the valley coupling in graphene has not become a physical reality for a long time, there are few further studies based on the valley fieldeffect transistors of graphene and related studies. Recent experiments by Gutierrez et al. [9] have revealed an unusual Yshaped Kekulé(KekY) bond texture in the honeycomb lattice on a graphenecopper superlattice, where one of six carbon atoms in each superlattice unit cell has no copper atoms below it and acquires a shorter nearestneighbor bond. Further, Gamayun has shown that the KekY bond texture offers a way for a momentumcontrolled valley precession [10]. Beenakker et al. [11] showed that the Kek system can bring out a valley flip effect via the Andreevlike reflection. Rencently Wang et al. [12] found that the CC bondlength modulation of the Kekulé lattice that keeps the inversion symmetry of the system can be used to manipulate the valley degree of freedom in a similar way to the exchange field precessing spin. This makes it possible to design a new type of valley fieldeffect transistor in graphene. Moreover, there is no report on the combined effects of the KekY lattice distortion on the valley pseudomagnetoresistance in graphene. Valley pseudomagnetoresistance [13, 14] is analogous to the magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel junction [15] where the magnitude of the spin current depends on the magnetic orientation of the electrodes [4].
Methods
In this work, we propose a new type of valley fieldeffect transistors (VFETs) for graphenebased electron. The device design assumes a ferromagneticstrain (FMS) source/drain for valley polarized injection/detection, which resembles conventional spin transistor (see Fig. 1a). Valley rotation in the graphene channel relies on KekY graphene superlattice [10–12], which can be achieved by a superlattice of graphene grown epitaxially onto Cu(111), with the copper atoms in registry with the carbon atoms [9]. However, copper atoms are lacking under some carbon atoms, resulting in some periodic copper atom vacancies appearing below graphene. Such substrate atom vacancy leads to three neighboring bonds being contracted. Here, we use δt to represent the energy modification to the electron’s hopping corresponding to these three bonds. We assume that the ferromagnetic graphene is made of the same FM metal stripe. The two magnetizations of the source and drain are directed along the current direction (the x axis), which can be in either the parallel (P) or the antiparallel (AP) alignment, with the help of an external inplane magnetic field. In the Landau gauge, the magnetic vector potential arising from the fringe field has the form [16, 17] \(A(r)=A_{y}(x)\overrightarrow {y}\) with A_{y}(x)=A_{y}[Θ(−x)±Θ(x−L)], where the plus(minus) sign corresponds to the P(AP) configuration of magnetizations, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function. On the other hand, we assume that the same strain are applied on source and drain of the VFETs, which can be induced by a tension on the substrate of the graphene [18]. The elastic deformation can be treated as a perturbation to the hopping amplitudes and acts as a gauge potential A_{S}(r). The tension is set along the x direction, in this case, A_{S}(r) uniform along the y axis [16]. For definiteness, we take a typical smooth profile of its y component as A_{Sy}(x)=A_{S}[Θ(−x)+Θ(x−L)], where A_{S} is the amplitude. In addition, a electic barrier are also applied in the KekY lattice region, which can be tuned by external bias voltage.
The lowenergy excitation quasiparticles propagation in the VFETs with KekY graphene superlattices can be described by thes following single particle Hamiltonian [10–12]
Here, σ and τ are the Pauli matrices for the sublattice and the valley, respectively. P=(p_{x},p_{y}) is the momentum of massless Dirac electrons, τ_{z}=±1 for K and \(K^{^{\prime }}\) valleys, v_{F}=10^{6}m/s is the velocity of Dirac electrons in the pristine graphene, and v_{τ}≃v_{F}δt/3t is the velocity modification term from the bond contraction effect in the KekY lattice [12], where t is the hopping energy between the nearest neighboring cites for pristine graphene. U is the gatetunable potential barrier. A_{M}(x)=ev_{F}A_{y}(x) [19]. The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian in the graphene with KekY lattice distortion and electric barrier are given by
Here, α=+1(−1) specifies the conduction (valence) band. β=±1 denotes the two valleysplit subbands of the conduction and valence bands. Due to the translational invariance in the y direction, the transverse wave vector k_{y} is conserved. The eigenstates in the graphene with the homogeneous KekY lattice distortion are characterized by \(\Psi _{\beta }^{\pm }(k_{x\beta },k_{y})=\frac {1}{N_{\beta }}\left (1,P_{\beta }^{\pm },Q_{\beta } ^{\pm },R_{\beta }^{\pm }\right)^{T}\), where N_{β} is the normalization constant \(N_{\beta }=\left (1+P_{\beta }^{2}+Q_{\beta }^{2}+R_{\beta }^{2}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\) and \(P_{\beta }^{\pm }, Q_{\beta }^{\pm }\), and \(R_{\beta }^{\pm }\) are functions defined as follows:
The transmission probability from \(K^{^{\prime }}\) valley to \(K(K^{^{\prime }})\) valley \(T_{K^{^{\prime }},K(K^{^{\prime }})}\) can be calculated using the transfer matrix technique [20]. According to the LaudauerBtittiker formula, the valleydependent conductance is given by [21]:
Here \(G_{0}=2e^{2}W/\left (v_{F}\pi ^{2}\hbar ^{2}\right)\left \vert E\right \vert \), W is the width of the graphene sample in the y direction, and ϕ_{0} is the incident angle with respect to the x direction.
Before proceeding with the calculations, we discuss the band structure with k_{y}=0, as shown in Fig. 1b. In the FMS source region, the energy band of graphene is written as \(E=\alpha \sqrt {(\hbar v_{F}k_{x})^{2} +(A_{M}+\tau _{z}A_{S})^{2}}\). One can find that the valley degenerate is lift and different gaps are induced at the K and \(K^{^{\prime }}\) points because the total vector potential A_{M}+A_{S} acting on K electrons is higher than the total vector potential A_{M}−A_{S} acting on for \(K^{^{\prime }}\) electrons [19]. This indicates that only \(K^{^{\prime }}\) electrons can pass through the FMS source region when the incident energy is located in A_{M}−A_{S}<E<A_{M}+A_{S} [22, 23]. Similarly, in the FMS drain region, the energy band of graphene can be written as \(E=\alpha \sqrt {(\hbar v_{F}k_{x})^{2}+(\pm A_{M}+\tau _{z}A_{S})^{2}}\), where the ± sign corresponds to the P and AP configuration of magnetizations. So only \(K^{^{\prime }}\) electrons are detected in the P structure and only K electrons are detected in the AP structure when the Fermi energy locates at the range of [A_{M}−A_{S},A_{M}+A_{S}]. In the graphene channel, the valley degenerate is also lift, but there is an important difference. In contrast to the lead case, where the phases of K and \(K^{^{\prime }}\) components evolve with the same wave vector [i.e., \(k=E/\hbar v_{F}\)], now, they evolve separately with different wave vectors (\(k_{+}=(EU)/(\hbar v_{F}+\hbar v_{\tau })\) and \(k_{}=(EU)/(\hbar v_{F}\hbar v_{\tau })\)) due to the KekY graphene superlattices mixing the valley (see Eq. 2). This leads to the valley precession of channel electrons in the valley space [12]. The valley precession in graphene is the basis for the valley field effect transistor [8]. And the valley precession can also be characterized by a valley pseudomagnetoresistance (VPMR) in the FMS/KekY/FMS junctions, analogous to the magnetoresistance in graphenebased quantum tunneling junctions with the spinorbit interaction [4], which is defined as \(VPMR=\frac {G_{P}G_{AP}}{G_{P}}\), where G_{P} and G_{AP} represent the conductance in P and AP configurations, respectively, and \(G_{P}=G_{K^{^{\prime }},K^{^{\prime }}}, G_{AP}=G_{K^{^{\prime }},K}\). The magnitude of the valley current depends on the magnetic orientation of the source and drain in our considered device.
Numerical Results and Discussions
In the following, we present the numerical results for the FMS/KekY/FMS junction in graphene. Throughout the paper, we set channel length L=207nm, and restrict the Fermi energy 20 meV<E<140meV, assumed it satisfying A_{M}−A_{S}<E<A_{M}+A_{S}. Figure 2a and b show the calculated results of tunneling conductance and VPMR as a function of v_{t} with Fermi energy E=80meV and rectangle potential barrier U=−10meV. We can find that G_{P} and G_{AP} have the same oscillation periods but the inverse phases. Therefore, the VPMR oscillates with increase of v_{t} and the negative value VPMR can appear. Those phenomena are similar to the case of the magnetoresistance in ballistic graphenebased quantum tunneling junctions with the spinorbit interaction [4]. The oscillation characters of the conductance of G_{P} and G_{AP} can be explained by the phase difference between the two valley components. When the incident angle ϕ_{0}=0, the phase shift is given by: \(\Delta \theta =(k_{x+}k_{x})L=\frac {2(EU)v_{\tau }}{\hbar (v_{F}^{2}v_{\tau }^{2})}L\). Δθ determines the orientation of valley polarization before the electron enters the drain, relative to that of the drain state [8]. For Δθ=±2nπ,n=1,2,3⋯, the two polarizations are aligned, leading to the conductance G_{P} maximum and VPMR a high positive value (as seen in v_{τ}=0.022, 0.033). On the other hand, for Δθ=±(2n+1)π,n=0,1,2⋯, they are orthogonal to each other, leading to the conductance G_{AP} minimum and VPMR negative (as seen in v_{τ}=0.0167, 0.027, 0.038).
The conductance and VPMR are not only oscillation functions of the hoppingenergy modification, they also oscillate with Fermi energy and the effective barrier potential since Δθ scales are also linear with the Fermi energy and the potential barrier U. Figure 3a and b show the conductance as a function of Fermi energy and the effective barrier potential, respectively. The corresponding VPMR are given in Fig. 3c and d. They all show oscillation characteristics varying with E and U value, even when the effective barrier potential U is greater than Fermi energy E. The physical origin for such a phenomenon is related to the Klein tunneling [12]. Although there are similar oscillation phenomena of conductance and VPMR for increased E and U, some differences can be also found. As E increases, the difference between G_{P} and G_{AP} conductance becomes smaller and smaller, which lead the oscillation amplitude of VPMR to becomes decreased with the increase of Fermi energy. While under the condition Δθ=±nπ is satisfied, the difference between G_{P} and G_{AP} is greater with increasing of U, especially in some location, the G_{P} and G_{AP} conductance presents switching characteristics. The characters are more desirable for the application of VPMR. Remarkably, the observed maximum value of VPMR is over 30,000% at small E. This value greatly exceeds MR of ~ 175% in the ballistic graphenebased quantum tunneling junctions with the spinorbit interaction [4] and the pseudomagnetoresistance of ~ 100% in bilayer graphene controlled by external gates [24], which is even larger than the VPMR of ~ 10000% in a merging Dirac cones system [13].
Conclusions
In conclusion, we proposed a type of valley fieldeffect transistors for graphenebased electron and studied the valley pseudomagnetoresistance through it. We have shown that the oscillation feature of valley pseudomagnetoresistance not only related to the hoppingenergy modification and Fermi energy, but also can be tuned largely by the effective barrier potential. The valley pseudomagnetoresistance tuned by external bias voltage benefits the valley fieldeffect transistor device, and we anticipate that the electric controlled valley quantum devices proposed here can play a role in quantum and quantumclassical hybrid computers.
Further research could involve the different strain (uniaxial vs. biaxial) tunable the valley scattering of electrons and transport in our proposed graphenebased valley fieldeffect transistors since the stain is useful to control the degree of intervalley scattering in Kekulé patterns [25]. Then, other twodimensional materials (MoS_{2}, WS_{2}, WSe_{2}, etc.) analogs in graphene can also provide an interesting platform for other twodimensional materialbased valley fieldeffect transistors with Yshaped Kekulé lattice distortion.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.
Abbreviations
 AP:

Antiparallel
 FMS:

Ferromagneticstrain
 KekY:

Yshaped Kekulé
 P:

Parallel
 VFETs:

Valley fieldeffect transistors
 VPMR:

Valley pseudomagnetoresistance
References
 1
Schwierz F (2010) Graphene transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 5(7):487.
 2
Semenov Y, Kim K, Zavada J (2007) Spin field effect transistor with a graphene channel. Appl Phys Lett 91(15):153105.
 3
Beiranvand R, Hamzehpour H (2019) Tunable magnetoresistance in spinorbit coupled graphene junctions. J Magn Magn Mater 474:111–117.
 4
Bai C, Wang J, Jia S, Yang Y (2010) Spinorbit interaction effects on magnetoresistance in graphenebased ferromagnetic double junctions. Appl Phys Lett 96(22):223102.
 5
Morpurgo A, Guinea F (2006) Intervalley scattering, longrange disorder, and effective timereversal symmetry breaking in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(19):196804.
 6
Morozov SV, Novoselov KS, Katsnelson MI, Schedin F, Ponomarenko LA, Jiang D, Geim AK (2006) Strong suppression of weak localization in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97:016801.
 7
Chen JH, Cullen WG, Jang C, Fuhrer MS, Williams ED (2009) Defect scattering in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 102:236805.
 8
Lee MK, Lue NY, Wen CK, Wu G (2012) Valleybased fieldeffect transistors in graphene. Phys Rev B 86(16):165411.
 9
Gutiérrez C, Kim CJ, Brown L, Schiros T, Nordlund D, Lochocki EB, et al (2016) Imaging Chiral symmetry breaking from Kekulé bond order in graphene. Nat Phys 12(10):950.
 10
Gamayun O, Ostroukh V, Gnezdilov N, Adagideli İ, Beenakker C (2018) Valleymomentum locking in a graphene superlattice with yshaped Kekulé bond texture. New J Phys 20(2):023016.
 11
Beenakker CWJ, Gnezdilov NV, Dresselhaus E, Ostroukh VP, Herasymenko Y, Adagideli idI, Tworzydło J (2018) Valley switch in a graphene superlattice due to pseudoAndreev reflection. Phys Rev B 97:241403(R).
 12
Wang JJ, Liu S, Wang J, Liu JF (2018) Valleycoupled transport in graphene with yshaped kekulé structure. Phys Rev B 98(19):195436.
 13
Ang YS, Yang SA, Zhang C, Ma Z, Ang LK (2017) Valleytronics in merging Dirac cones: allelectriccontrolled valley filter, valve, and universal reversible logic gate. Phys Rev B 96(24):245410.
 14
Wu Z, Zhai F, Peeters F, Xu H, Chang K (2011) Valleydependent brewster angles and GoosHänchen effect in strained graphene. Phys Rev Lett 106(17):176802.
 15
Zhang YT, Jiang H, Sun Qf, Xie X (2010) Spin polarization and giant magnetoresistance effect induced by magnetization in zigzag graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev B 81(16):165404.
 16
Zhai F, Zhao X, Chang K, Xu H (2010) Magnetic barrier on strained graphene: a possible valley filter. Phys Rev B 82(11):115442.
 17
Moldovan D, Masir MR, Covaci L, Peeters F (2012) Resonant valley filtering of massive dirac electrons. Phys Rev B 86(11):115431.
 18
Teague M, Lai A, Velasco J, Hughes C, Beyer A, Bockrath M, et al (2009) Evidence for straininduced local conductance modulations in singlelayer graphene on sio2. Nano Lett 9(7):2542–2546.
 19
Song Y, Zhai F, Guo Y (2013) Generation of a fully valleypolarized current in bulk graphene. Appl Phys Lett 103(18):183111.
 20
Wu QP, Liu ZF, Chen AX, Xiao XB, Zhang H, Miao GX (2017) Valley precession and valley polarization in graphene with intervalley coupling. J PhysCondes Matter 29(39):395303.
 21
Büttiker M, Imry Y, Landauer R, Pinhas S (1985) Generalized manychannel conductance formula with application to small rings. Phys Rev B 31(10):6207.
 22
Wu QP, Liu ZF, Chen AX, Xiao XB, Liu ZM (2016) Full valley and spin polarizations in strained graphene with Rashba spin orbit coupling and magnetic barrier. Sci Rep 6:21590.
 23
Wu QP, Liu ZF, Chen AX, Xiao XB, Miao GX (2017) Pure valley and spin polarization current in ferromagnetic graphene junction. J Appl Phys 121(5):053906.
 24
SanJose P, Prada E, McCann E, Schomerus H (2009) Pseudospin valve in bilayer graphene: towards graphenebased pseudospintronics. Phys Rev Lett 102(24):247204.
 25
Andrade E, CarrilloBastos R, Naumis GG (2019) Valley engineering by strain in Kekulédistorted graphene. Phys Rev B 99:035411.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11764013, 11864012, and 11664019).
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11764013, 11864012, and 11664019).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
QPW conceived the research work. LLC and YZL carried out the computation. QPW, ZFL, and XBX analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Q., Chang, L., Li, Y. et al. ElectricControlled Valley Pseudomagnetoresistance in Graphene with YShaped Kekulé Lattice Distortion. Nanoscale Res Lett 15, 46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1167102032755
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Pseudomagnetoresistance
 Yshaped Kekulé lattice
 Graphene