Skip to main content

Graphene-Based Polarization-Independent Mid-Infrared Electro-Absorption Modulator Integrated in a Chalcogenide Glass Waveguide

Abstract

A polarization-insensitive graphene-based mid-infrared optical modulator is presented that comprised SiO2/ Ge23Sb7S70, in which two graphene layers are embedded with a semiellipse layout to support transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) polarizing modes with identical absorption. The key performance index for the polarization independent modulator is polarization-sensitivity loss (PSL). The waveguide of our device just supports basic TE and TM modes, and the PSL between two modes is of < 0.24 dB. The model can offer extinction ratio (ER) more than 16 dB and insertion loss less than 1 dB. The operation spectrum ranges from 2 to 2.4 μm with optical bandwidth of 400 nm. The 3 dB modulation bandwidth is as high as 136 GHz based on theoretical calculation.

Introduction

Near-infrared wavelength optical fiber communication networks are becoming the core of the whole telecommunication networks. However, the mid-infrared is also an important waveband for the application of electro-optic device in military and civil fields, such as infrared countermeasure, chemical sensing, infrared guidance, environmental monitoring, space communication, etc. In addition, mid-infrared integrated electro-optic devices, such as photodetectors and modulators, also are developed to expand the 1.55 μm communication window.

In recent years, 2D functional electro-optic materials, such as graphene [1,2,3,4], chalcogenide [5], and black phosphorus [6], have been discovered, which accelerated the development of integrated electro-optic and broke the traditional performance limitation. Among these materials, graphene is considered as an ideal material for realizing optical modulators due to some attractive advantages [7], such as constant absorption over a wide spectrum [8], ultra-high carrier mobility at room temperature [9], electrically controllable conductivity and compatibility with CMOS processing. Consequently, graphene-based optical modulator has become a hot research topic. However, by far, the operation waveband of most reported graphene-based optical modulators is around 1.31 μm or 1.55 μm [10,11,12,13]. The modulation principle of near infrared and mid-infrared is the same, but the operation wavelength of modulator mainly depends on the waveguide transparency windows. The key point for the realization of graphene-based mid-infrared modulators is the integration of graphene and various mid-infrared waveguide materials. In 2017, Lin et al. [14] reported a mid-infrared electro-absorption optical modulator based on Ge23Sb7S70-on-graphene structure, which opened the field of graphene-based mid-infrared modulator.

Graphene as electro-optic material, we also need to consider one of the most important characteristics of anisotropic dielectric [15], which has been experimentally proved in this article [16]. The permittivity in plane is tunable, however, the permittivity in vertical is a constant of 2.5. So, the graphene can only strongly interact with the in-plane electric field [10], that is the reason why reported graphene-based modulators before have a strong polarization dependence, in which modulators can only modulate in-plane electric filed mode [10,11,12,13]. Generally, the polarization state of light in waveguide or fiber is random. To realize the wide commercial application of graphene-based modulator, the problem of polarization dependent needs to be solved.

In this work, we present a new structure of graphene-based mid-infrared polarization-independent electro-optic modulator, which has the advantages of large modulation bandwidth and wide spectrum of polarization insensitivity. We used the SOI structure and a Ge23Sb7S70 glass strip which is embedded in SiO2 cladding as waveguide core. In the Ge23Sb7S70 waveguide, two graphene layers are U (semiellipse)-type distribution and are insulated by Ge23Sb7S70 glass. Since the graphene layer is U-type distribution, both TE and TM modes can strongly interact with graphene. By proper choosing structure parameters, we can well overcome the polarization dependence. Using the finite element method (FEM), we analyzed the effective mode index (EMI) and absorption coefficient (α) of the U-structure device. The result shows that the real parts of EMI for TE (Nte) and TM (Ntm) modes have the same fluctuations (with constant difference) in different chemical potential (μc), and the imaginary parts of both TE and TM modes have almost identical fluctuations and wavelength independent in a wide spectrum. By proper choosing of switching points for “ON” and “OFF” states, for both TE and TM modes, the modulation depth is more than 16 dB, the operation wavelength spectrum is 2–2.4 μm, the PSL is less than 0.24 dB, and the theoretical 3 dB modulation bandwidth is as high as 136 GHz.

Methods

The transparency window of Ge23Sb7S70 glass ranges from 2 to 10 μm [17] that is a great material for mid-infrared photonics. Previous study led by Lin et al. [14] has proved its feasibility to realize Ge23Sb7S70-graphene mid-infrared modulator. In this work, we also take Ge23Sb7S70 glass as waveguide material. The geometrical structure of our proposed modulator is depicted in Fig. 1, which was fabricated using a thermal nanoimprint process. Details of the process steps are schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. You can also reference paper [18] to get details for the preparation of PDMS composite stamps and Ge23Sb7S70 glass solution. Details for geometrical size and materials are presented in Fig. 2b.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic process flow of the graphene-based modulator integrated in Ge23Sb7S70

Fig. 2
figure2

Illustration of the polarization-independent electro-absorption optical modulator. a 3D Schematic diagram of the modulator; b 2D cross section of the U-structure Ge23Sb7S70-graphene waveguide, distance between two graphene layer d = 50 nm, waveguide width w = 0.96 μm, height h = 0.8 μm. The electric field distribution for TE mode (c) and TM mode (d), arrows indicate the direction of polarization

A SiO2 layer with thickness h = 0.8 μm was grown on Si substrate, and then a groove with width w = 0.96 μm and height h = 0.8 μm was made in SiO2 layer by using photolithography method. After filling Ge23Sb7S70 solution and pattering by thermal nanoimprint, a U-type Ge23Sb7S70 groove was made. A 10-nm-thickness hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) layer was paved at flat area. Then, first graphene layer, 50-nm-thickness (spin-coating) Ge23Sb7S70 insulator and second graphene layer were paved to the U-type Ge23Sb7S70 groove in order. Finally, we filled the U-type Ge23Sb7S70 groove with Ge23Sb7S70 solution and transferred hBN cladding and added electrode. The electrode structure is Au–Pd-graphene since the contact resistance between graphene and Pd is less than 100(Ω/μm) [19]. Graphene sheet width between electrode and waveguide is 0.8 μm. Figure 2c, d presents the electric field distribution for both TE (in-plane) and TM (vertical-plane) modes.

When voltage is applied onto the graphene, graphene’s chemical potential μc is dynamically tuned. In our model, graphene is treated as an anisotropic material. The perpendicular permittivity ε of the graphene does not vary with the μc and always stays as a constant of 2.5, whereas the in-plane permittivity of the graphene ε can be tuned as [12].

$$\varepsilon_{\parallel } \left( \omega \right) = 1 + \frac{i\delta }{{\omega \varepsilon_{0} h_{g} }}$$
(1)

The δ stands for the conductivity of graphene and relates to chemical potential μc, which can be deduced from Kubo formula [20]. The ω represents the radian frequency, and hg = 0.7 nm is the effective thickness of graphene.

We made a Ge23Sb7S70 strip waveguide, in which two flat graphene layers were embedded (Fig. 3 insert). Figure 3 plots the real and imaginary part of EMI for both TE and TM mode at the wavelength of 2.2 μm. The EMI of TE mode changed obviously for both real and imaginary parts. On contrary, no significant fluctuations occurred to the EMI of TM mode for both real and imaginary parts. The main reason is that TM mode polarization is perpendicular to the graphene plane and ε is nontunable in chemical potential. In this work, we bend the graphene layer as U-type layout to impose equal influence on both TE and TM modes.

Fig. 3
figure3

Graphene was straightly paved in Ge23Sb7S70 strip waveguide. The real and imaginary parts of EMI for both TE and TM modes at the wavelength of 2.2 μm

Results and Discussion

Although the polarization-independent electro-optic modulator based on graphene has been reported [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], the polarization independence of these devices is closely related to wavelength [22]. Therefore, in our model, the U-structure is used, in which we find that the sensitivity of the waveguide polarization is weak correlation with wavelength. The imaginary part of the EMI is known as electro-absorption. As shown in Fig. 3, the imaginary part of the EMI reaches peak at low chemical potential around μc = 0.1 eV. Thus, the μc = 0.1 eV point can be chosen as “OFF” state point. At the same time, the discrepancy of imaginary part of the EMI between TE and TM modes is highest at “OFF” state point. To get lower discrepancy of absorption, we just need to minimize the discrepancy of absorption at “OFF” state point. At wavelength = 2.2 μm and Ra = 0.35 μm (size of minor radius of the ellipse that is the horizontal axis), by sweeping the μc from 0.1 to 0.8 eV, under different Rb (size of major radius of the ellipse that is the vertical axis), the influence of varied μc on EMI for both TE and TM modes is analyzed, as shown in Fig. 4a. It is obvious that the discrepancy values between the TE and TM modes decrease rapidly as Rb is tuned from 0.35 to 0.55 μm. It indicates that it is possible to reach lower PSL around Rb = 0.55um. Therefore, sweeping the parameter Rb around 0.55 μm, we find that the discrepancy of absorption between TE and TM modes decreases firstly and then increases with the increase in Rb. At the point Rb = 0.565 μm, a minimum value can be obtained.

Fig. 4
figure4

a Absorption coefficient of TE and TM modes as a function of μc at different Rb, (wavelength = 2.2 μm, Ra = 0.35 μm); b the absorption coefficient of TE and TM modes as a function of Rb (Ra = 0.35 μm, wavelength = 2.2 μm, μc = 0.1 eV)

When Ra = 0.35 μm, Rb = 0.565 μm, wavelength = 2.2 μm, the variation of EMI for both TE and TM modes with chemical potential was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5, the real part of EMI has same variation trend for TE and TM modes with constant difference. Since the modulator is based on electro-absorption principle, we just need to care about the imaginary part of EMI. What is more, under all the μc values, the α of both TE and TM are almost identical. It is the property that we need for designing polarization independent electro-absorption modulator. A highest and lowest value of α (proportional to the imaginary part of EMI) can be obtained at μc = 0.1 eV and μc = 0.8 eV, respectively (Fig. 5). Thus, the point of μc = 0.1 eV and μc = 0.8 eV can be chosen as “OFF” and “ON” state point.

Fig. 5
figure5

Illustration of the real and imaginary parts of EMI for both TE and TM modes as a function of chemical potential

The variation of α as a function of wavelength is presented in Fig. 6a, b. It can be seen from Fig. 6 that the α of the two modes is very identical with the wavelength change in the strong absorption state (“OFF” state), and the differences between the two modes have been kept relatively small. At the “ON” state, the discrepancy of α between TE and TM modes is at the order of 10–4. To measure the discrepancy further and accurately between two modes, PSL is defined as PSL = ER(TE)-ER(TM), where ER is the extinction ratio. We measured the modulation depth of the modulator in two modes as a function of wavelength under the condition of 200 μm long waveguide. As shown in Fig. 7, it can be seen from the diagram that in a wide spectrum range of 2–2.4 μm, the modulation depth of the two modes is more than 16 dB, and PSL is less than 0.24 dB.

Fig. 6
figure6

Absorption coefficients (α) of TE and TM have an almost identical fluctuation with the change of wavelength at “OFF” state (a) and “ON” state (b)

Fig. 7
figure7

Modulation depth of the two modes and PSL (line ER(TE-TM)) between two modes at different wavelengths

For an optical modulator, the 3 dB modulation bandwidth f3dB is always one of the important parameters to be concerned about. Since graphene has ultrahigh carrier mobility at room temperature, the graphene-based modulator’s operation speed is no longer limited by minority carrier lifetime like traditional semiconductor modulators are. The f3dB of a graphene-based modulator is mainly impeded by RC delay, which can be expressed as

$$f_{{3\;{\text{dB}}}} = \frac{1}{2\pi RC}$$
(2)

The R is the device’s total resistance, including graphene sheet resistance Rs and metal–graphene contact resistance Rc, which has been carefully discussed in previous works [23]-[25]. The C is the capacitance of modulator, which mainly consists of the capacitor that is formed by the two graphene flakes. Although this capacitor is not an ideal parallel-plate capacitor model, to preliminarily estimate the f3dB, we still use the parallel-plate capacitor model to calculate the C. In our calculations, Rc = 100 Ω/μm [19] and Rs = 200 Ω/μm [26] were used, and the overlap width of two graphene flakes is about 1.53 μm. The estimated f3dB is as high as 136 GHz. Moreover, lower values of both Rs and Rc are possible in the future, which means higher f3dB can be obtained.

The above simulations are based on the semiellipse layout with Ra = 0.35 μm and Rb = 0.565 μm. However, in fabrication, this exact radius size cannot always be guaranteed. Therefore, we have also investigated the fabrication tolerance (Fig. 8). When Ra varies from 0.345 to 0.355 μm (Fig. 8a), or Rb varies from 0.56 to 0.57 μm (Fig. 8b), the PSL between two modes is still lower than 0.6 dB. So, our device has large fabrication tolerance.

Fig. 8
figure8

Modulation depth of the two modes at different Ra (a) or Rb (b)

Conclusions

In conclusion, we presented a concept of a broadband polarization-independent graphene-based mid-infrared electro-absorption optical modulator. In our structure, a U-structure double-layer graphene is placed in chalcogenide glass waveguide. Under different graphene chemical potentials, different wavelengths and different short radius lengths, the graphene-induced EMI variations for both TE and TM modes are investigated. The results show that TE and TM modes have almost identical absorption coefficient variation in the mid-infrared 2–2.4 μm, which fulfills the requirement of polarization-independent modulation. Based on this structure, the modulator with a length of 200 μm has a modulation depth more than 16 dB. The modulation depth difference between the two modes is 0.24 dB, and the theoretical modulation bandwidth of the device is as high as 136 GHz. We believe that this mid-infrared polarization-independent graphene-based electro-optic modulator will further promote the study of the graphene-based modulator in the middle-infrared bands.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ER:

Extinction ratio

TM:

Transverse magnetic

TE:

Transverse electric

PSL:

Polarization-sensitivity loss

FEM:

Finite element method

EMI:

Effective mode index

hBN:

Hexagonal boron nitride

References

  1. 1.

    Ferrari AC et al (2015) Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7(11):4598–4810

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    He X, Liu F, Lin F et al (2021) Tunable 3D Dirac-semimetals supported mid-IR hybrid plasmonic waveguides. Opt Lett 46(3):472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Peng J, He X, Shi C et al (2020) Investigation of graphene supported terahertz elliptical metamaterials. Phys E 124:114309

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    He X, Liu F, Lin F et al (2021) Tunable terahertz Dirac semimetal metamaterials. J Phys D Appl Phys 54(23):235103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Choi W et al (2017) Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater Today 20(3):116–130

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ling X et al (2015) The renaissance of black phosphorus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(15):4523

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yu SL et al (2017) 2D Materials for optical modulation: challenges and opportunities. Adv Mater 29(14):201606128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nair RR et al (2008) Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320(5881):1308–1308

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bolotin KI et al (2008) Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Commun 146(9):351–355

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu M et al (2011) A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474(7349):64–67

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu M, Yin X, Zhang X (2012) Double-layer graphene optical modulator. Nano Lett 12(3):1482–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Koester SJ, Li M (2012) High-speed waveguide-coupled graphene-on-graphene optical modulators. Appl Phys Lett 100(17):611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Phare CT et al (2015) Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth. Nat Photonics 9(8):511–514

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lin H et al (2017) Chalcogenide glass-on-graphene photonics. Nat Photonics 11(12):798–806

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hao R et al (2015) Graphene assisted TE/TM-independent polarizer based on Mach-Zehnder interferometer. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 27(10):1112–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang Z, Chiang KS (2016) Experimental verification of optical models of graphene with multimode slab waveguides. Opt Lett 41(9):2129–2132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Luo Z et al (2017) Mid-infrared integrated photonics on silicon: a perspective. Nanophotonics 7(2):393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zou Y et al (2015) Solution processing and resist-free nanoimprint fabrication of thin film chalcogenide glass devices: inorganic-organic hybrid photonic integration. Adv Opt Mater 2(8):759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhong H et al (2015) Realization of low contact resistance close to theoretical limit in graphene transistors. Nano Res 8(5):1669–1679

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Falkovsky LA (2008) Optical properties of graphene. J Phys Conf 129:012004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ye SW et al (2017) Polarization independent modulator by partly tilted graphene induced electro-absorption effect. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 1(1):99

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hu X, Gui CC, Wang J (2014) A graphene-based polarization-insensitive optical modulator. Integr Photonics Res Silicon Nanophotonics. JT3A.25

  23. 23.

    Ye SW et al (2014) Electro-absorption optical modulator using dual-graphene-on-graphene configuration. Opt Exp 22(21):26173–26180

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Koester SJ, Li M (2012) High-speed waveguide-coupled graphene-on-graphene optical modulators. Appl Phys Lett 100(21):171107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bonaccorso F et al (2010) Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nature Photon 4(9):611–622

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cai WW et al (2009) Large area few-layer graphene/graphite films as transparent thin conducting electrodes. Appl Phys Lett 95(12):123115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China and the Chongqing United Microelectronics Center.

Funding

This work was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFB2203800), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2020YFH0108) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZYGX2019J046).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YZ and RL did the design. JL, MT, LS, RL and ZY did the simulation together. YZ and GW wrote the initial drafts of the work. RL and YL commented and revised on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongguo Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Lu, R., Wang, G. et al. Graphene-Based Polarization-Independent Mid-Infrared Electro-Absorption Modulator Integrated in a Chalcogenide Glass Waveguide. Nanoscale Res Lett 16, 80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03538-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chalcogenide glass
  • Graphene
  • Mid-infrared
  • Optical-modulator
  • Polarization-insensitive