Skip to main content

Assembly of Carbon Dots into Frameworks with Enhanced Stability and Antibacterial Activity

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDs) have been widely used as antimicrobials due to their active surface, but some CDs suffer instability. Therefore, the relative applications such as the antibacterial activity may not be reliable for long-term use. Herein, we synthesize CDs with blue fluorescence by a hydrothermal process. Thereafter, polyethylenimine was applied for the assembly of CDs into CDs-based frameworks (CDFs). The CDFs exhibited quenched fluorescence but showed more stable properties based on the scanning electron microscope and zeta potential investigations. Both CDs and CDFs show antibacterial activity toward Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), but CDFs exhibited better antibacterial performance, and S. aureus could be completely inhibited with the minimum inhibitory concentration of 30 μg/mL. This reveals CDFs magnify both the stability and antibacterial activity, which would be more promising for practical applications.

Graphic abstract

Introduction

Bacterial infections show a serious threat to human lives, and the development of effective medicines to disinfect bacteria is in great demand [1]. Various antibiotics have been used for treating bacterial infections, but the overuse of antibiotics causes other problems such as side effects and drug-resistant issues [2]. The nanomaterials including antimicrobial polymers [3], metal nanomaterials [4], and carbon nanomaterials [5, 6] have been used as alternatives to classical antibiotics [7]. Both drug-resistant and toxic problems are relieving [8]. Recently, CDs [9, 10] and nanoclusters (NCs) [11] are well applied for combating bacterial infections because they are biocompatible [12], active [13], and can be easily cleaned by circulations due to the ultra-small sizes [14, 15]. Especially, researchers have found that CDs show excellent free radical scavenging ability, which can be stronger than many traditional anti-infection drugs [16,17,18]. However, some ultra-small antimicrobials suffer poor stability due to the larger oxidative surface area [19]. It is highly desired to develop more effective antibacterial agents for combating bacterial infections for long-term use.

To meet the demand for practical applications, the antimicrobials should have the following characteristics: (a) Excellent stability remains unchanged for a certain time in an ambient environment; (b) Excellent biocompatibility and low toxicity: (c) high antibacterial activity. The larger nanomaterials tend to be more stable, but they might have relatively weaker antibacterial activity due to the smaller active surface area. Considering both the weakness of small and large nanomaterials, we report the assembly of the small CDs into large CDFs by simply adding polyethyleneimine (PEI) (Fig. 1). CDs were not fused but kept their morphology as building blocks. Therefore, the entire CDFs showed larger sizes but demonstrated more excellent stability without losing the active properties of CDs. Further, we found the CDFs displayed enhanced antibacterial activities against both Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) compared to CDs, indicating their broad-spectrum antibacterial performance, though many CDs only eradicated Gram-positive bacteria [20]. In addition, the CDFs promoted the proliferation of the PC12 cells (a cell line obtained from a pheochromocytoma of the rat adrenal medulla), showing great potential for nerve recovery applications [21]. This work suggests the assembly of small CDs into large CDFs not only enhances the stability but also magnifies the antibacterial activity.

Fig. 1
figure1

Scheme for the synthesis of CDs and the assembly into CDFs by adding PEI with enhanced antibacterial activity

Materials and Methods

Materials and Instrument

X-ray surface photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on an ESCALAB250Xi X-ray surface photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) instrument. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) was performed by a JEM-2100 microscope operating at 200 kV. The fluorescence of the materials was obtained using the F97 fluorescence spectrometer. The FDA/PI staining of the bacterial cells was recorded in tapping mode with a Leica DFC450C microscope. Fluorescence lifetime was measured on a time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) system using a Nanolog spectrofluorometer (Horbia JY, Japan). Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV–vis) spectra are obtained from the UV-1600 instrument. The bacterial imaging was observed by a confocal microscope (Olympus FLUOVIEW FV1000 c). All the reagents were of analytical grades. The deionized water was used through the experiments. Cell counting kit-8 was obtained from Beyotime Biotechnology.

Preparation of CDs and CDFs

L- cysteine (1.0 g) was dissolved in 10.0 mL of deionized water and mixed well. Then, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 9.0 with 1.0 M NaOH. The solution was transferred to a hydrothermal reactor and heated at 160 °C for 24 h. After the solution was cooled to room temperature, the resulting solution was subjected to dialysis using a dialysis bag (MW 7000 cut off) for one day. The as-obtained CDs were used for the following characterizations and experiments. For the preparation of CDFs, 40 µL of 1% PEI was added to 1 mL of the CDs. The mixture was allowed to stay for 1 h. The product was purified by dialysis using the same method as the purification of CDs. For HR-TEM characterization, the samples were concentrated into a small volume, transferred to a silica gel column, and eluted with methanol and dichloromethane to obtain the further purified products.

Toxicity Evaluation

PC12 cells were seeded in 96-well plates for 12 h and then were incubated with CDs and CDFs with different concentrations. The number of viable cells was investigated using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8). 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added at 1/10 culture volume, and the cells were returned to the incubator. After that the supernatants were discarded and 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well. The crystals were dissolved by shaking the plates for 10 min. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured using the Microreader (Varioskan LUX Multimode Reader). Blank control wells were included for all the absorbance measurements.

Antibacterial Experiment

E. coli and S. aureus were incubated in the absence and presence of CDs and CDFs at 37 °C with 250 rpm shake. Growth of the bacterial cells in Lysogeny broth (LB) culture was measured by the Microreader at 600 nm wavelength (OD600). LB medium was used as the blank control. The OD600 stands for the cell density, and the relative cell viability was calculated based on the comparison between the cultured bacterial cells in the presence of the materials to the control group (OD600 of the bacterial cells in the absence of the CDs or CDFs). The live/dead bacteria are evaluated by the FDA/PI staining protocol [22].

Detection of Ros Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

Intracellular ROS production was measured in bacterial cells before and after the treatment by CDs and CDFs for 12 h, with a 2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe following the instructions. The fluorescence was detected at an emission wavelength of 525 nm with excitation at 488 nm.

Results and Discussions

Characterization of the Materials

Size Investigations

Figure 2 shows the SEM of the powder for CDFs with relatively lower (Fig.  2a0) and higher magnification (Fig. 2b0) after exposure to the air for several hours. It can be seen that the CDFs were well distributed and showed an average size of ca. 25 nm. CDs were supposed to show mono-dispersed small sizes based on the TEM and AFM study (Additional file 1: Figure S1), but these small particles exhibited aggregation observing by SEM after exposure to air for a certain time (Additional file 1: Figure S2). On the other hand, CDFs kept their morphology though they were exposed to the ambient environment. This indicated the as-obtained CDFs are more promising for practical applications. CDFs were further characterized by TEM (Fig. 2b1). It can be seen that CDFs exhibited assembly structures with small CDs as the building blocks. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) (Fig. 2b2) analysis revealed that the building block of CDFs exhibited lattice fringes with a d-spacing of 0.21 nm, corresponding to the (100) plane lattice of graphite, which was similar to the classical CDs [23,24,25]. Therefore, the assembly CDFs do not lose the feature of CDs, which may combine the advantages of both the entire large frameworks and the interior small building blocks.

Fig. 2
figure2

SEM for CDFs with relatively lower (a0) and higher magnification (b0); TEM (b1) HR-TEM (b2) of CDFs

Zeta Potential

Zeta-potential investigations were used to measure the degree of electrostatic repulsion of CDs and CDFs between adjacent charged particles in the dispersed system (Fig. 3). It can be seen that the zeta-potential peak of CDs was not well featured, which were exposed to the ambient environment. Besides, multiple zeta potential peaks were obtained with large zeta deviations (Table 1), indicating the CDs were quite unstable and unrepeatable. On the other hand, the zeta potential peak for CDFs focused at a relatively stable range. We also had much smaller zeta deviations based on three times measurements, revealing CDFs were more stable and the dispersed systems had samples with higher purity.

Fig. 3
figure3

Zeta potential of CDs (a) and CDFs (b)

Table 1 Zeta potential (ZP) and Zeta deviation (ZD) of CDs and CDFs

Fluorescence Properties

The fluorescence emission spectra were used to monitor the assembly process of CDs to CDFs (Fig. 4). As the titration of PEI, the fluorescence emission at 350 nm gradually quenched (Fig. 4a). But no significant fluorescence spectra shift was observed, revealing no aggregation occurred. The assembly structure of CDFs changes the entire size of CDs, which influences fluorescence. Meanwhile, the nearby CDs marked the fluorescence of each other. As well as this, surface chemistry plays an important role in fluorescence properties. The nitrogen atoms and sulfur atoms on the surface of CDs can generate energy traps. The bright fluorescence of CDs attributes to the defect surface with many carbonyl and amino groups. After the functionalization of PEI, the surface of CDFs was dominated by the amino groups, which quenched the fluorescence together with the growing sizes. The comparison of the fluorescence behavior of CDs and CDFs was further examined by TCSPC to understand the photo-generated charge recombination pathways of the materials (Fig. 4b). Emission was monitored at 430 nm. The fluorescence decays required a two-component exponential fit. The time constants and relative amplitudes are fitted and summarized in Table S1. It could be seen that the lifetime of the dominant component for CDs was 2.45 ns, while that of the other component was 7.47 ns. On the other hand, the lifetime of the dominant component for CDs was 1.98 ns, while the other component showed a lifetime of 7.30 ns. No significant lifetime change was observed between CDs and CDFs, which also indicated the properties of CDs was not substantially changed while assembly into CDFs [26].

Fig. 4
figure4

Fluorescence emission spectra a of CDs as the titration of PEI, and lifetime b for CDs and CDFs

Toxicity

For evaluation of the safety of the materials, the toxicity of the CDs and CDFs to PC12 cells is investigated. Assays of MTT were conducted to investigate the influence of the materials on cell viabilities (Fig. 5). After incubation of PC12 with CDs and CDFs, cell viabilities were not much affected within 24 h. Interestingly, both carbon materials promote the proliferation of PC12, which plays an important role in the therapy of nerve damage. These results indicate the low toxicity of the materials, and the materials are promising for nerve protection with PC12 cells involved [27].

Fig. 5
figure5

Cell viability of PC12 in the presence of CDs (a) and CDFs (b). Cell viability (%) = (absorbance of the experimental group—absorbance of the blank group)/(absorbance of the control group—absorbance of the blank group) × 100%

Antibacterial Investigations

The antibacterial activities of the CDs and CDFs were initially evaluated by measuring the bacterial density in the presence of these agents at 600 nm [28]. Fig. 6 shows a substantial antibacterial effect of both the CDs and CDFs against both the S. aureus and E. coli cells. Especially, the viability of the S. aureus cells was almost 0 when larger than 30 µg/mL of the CDFs were used. Similarly, the E. coli cells were disinfected by both CDs and CDFs. CDs showed multiple charges (Fig. 3a). On the other hand, the CDFs were with insignificant charges (Fig. 3b), which might suppress the bacterial adhesion under weak repulsion thus interacting with the bacterial surface more easily. By comparison, the CDFs show higher antibacterial activity based on the phenomenon that a relatively larger ratio of the cells is killed when larger than 6 µg/mL of the materials are used. The enhanced antibacterial activity of CDFs is possibly attributed to the synergy effect of CDs as building blocks as well as the more stable surface charges. To deeply understand the antibacterial mechanism, the ROS that could oxidize nonfluorescent DCFH to fluorescent DFC was measured (Fig. 6C). Both carbon materials did not significantly induce ROS production after treating E. coli. However, CDFs remarkably enhanced intracellular ROS while interacted with S. aureus. Since ROS can damage bacterial DNA, RNA, and proteins, the enhanced value facilitated the disinfection of the bacteria. Furthermore, the ROS was stimulated with H2O2. It is worth noting that ROS productions were all dramatically promoted compared to the H2O2 treatment alone, while CDFs showed the highest enhancement. This indicated the combination of H2O2 with these two carbon materials might further enhance the antibacterial activity, especially for the CDFs.

Fig. 6
figure6

Antibacterial activity of CDs and CDFs against S. aureus (a) and E.coli (b), c fluorescence intensity of DCF at 525 nm, which shows a linear relationship with the ROS level, with the treatment of CDs and CDFs in the absence and presence of H2O2 (100 μM)

Some CDs were previously reported for disinfecting S. aureus, which is listed in Table 2 for comparison. The current CDFs showed a competitive MIC. Besides, rather than only decreasing the investigated cell viability, CDFs promoted cell proliferation of PC12, indicating their versatility while treating bacterial infections.

Table 2 Synthesis of CDs and the eradication of S. aureus

The integrity of the bacterial membrane after the CDs and CDFs treatment was investigated by the live/dead staining experiment (Fig. 7). The green fluorescent FDA staining can only show the live cells, while red fluorescent PI specifically stains dead bacteria with broken membranes, but the live ones with intact bacterial membranes are unstained [30, 31]. As shown in the fluorescence images, obvious red fluorescence was seen in the CDs-treated samples and a much higher density of the dead cells was seen by the CDFs-treated samples.

Fig. 7
figure7

FDA/PI staining S. aureus and E. coli in the absence and presence of CDs and CDFs at 30 µg/mL. Scale bar, 200 µm

Based on the above comparisons, we conclude that CDFs are promising for killing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cells. Therefore, E. coli and S. aureus before and after treating with 30 µg/mL of CDFs were characterized by SEM (Fig. 8). As shown in Fig. 8a, c, bacteria before treatment with CDFs exhibit regular surface. However, after incubating with CDFs, the morphology of the bacterial cells including S. aureus (Fig. 8b) and E. coli (Fig. 8d) changed drastically. Moreover, the membranes of many bacterial cells broke apart. Some small materials were observed on the surface of the bacteria, which originated from the attached CDFs. This indicates the CDFs can disinfect the bacterial cells by damaging the membranes [32].

Fig. 8
figure8

SEM for S. aureus (a, b) and E.coli before (a, c) and after (b, d) the treatment with 30 µg/mL of CDFs. Scale bar: 2 µm

Since both CDs and CDFs are fluorescent, 6 µg/mL of the agents was investigated for bacterial imaging during the progress of disinfection. The imaging of S. aureus was investigated and shown in Fig. 9. Interestingly, it was found that both CDs and CDFs could be used for imaging of the S. aureus. However, CDFs show higher uptake efficiency since the bacterial cells observing from the bright and dark fields almost overlapped. On the other hand, only part of S. aureus cells was stained by the CDs. Besides, the bacterial cell densities were smaller by the treatment of CDFs, representing CDFs disinfected S. aureus more efficiently compared to CDs at the same dosages. These results also reveal that CDFs may be used as alternative dyes for imaging various bacterial cells.

Fig. 9
figure9

Imaging of S. aureus by the uptake of CDs and CDFs after 12 h

Conclusions

The assembly of CDs into CDFs results in more robust antibacterial activity. It is concluded that the assembly structure enables more stable properties but magnifies the antibacterial activity of CDs. This work also provides a new avenue of assembly small nanomaterials into frameworks for more practical applications.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

CDs:

Carbon dots

CDFs:

Carbon dots-based frameworks

PEI:

Polyethylenimine

E. coli :

Escherichia coli

S. aureus :

Staphylococcus aureus

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

HR-TEM:

High resolution TEM

XPS:

X-ray surface photoelectron spectra

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

NCs:

Nanoclusters

TCSPC:

Time-correlated single-photon counting

CCK-8:

Cell counting Kit-8 assay

ROS:

Ros reactive oxygen species

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

ZP:

Zeta potential

References

  1. 1.

    YinghanChan XHW, Chieng BW, Ibrahim NA, Then YY (2021) Superhydrophobic nanocoatings as intervention against biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Nanomaterials 11:1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041046

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Leon-Buitimea A, Garza-Cardenas CR, Garza-Cervantes JA, Lerma-Escalera JA, Morones-Ramirez JR (2020) The demand for new antibiotics: antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, and combinatorial therapies as future strategies in antibacterial agent design. Front Microbiol 11:1669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shuai C et al (2020) A strawberry-like Ag-decorated barium titanate enhances piezoelectric and antibacterial activities of polymer scaffold. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang L et al (2020) The density of surface coating can contribute to different antibacterial activities of gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett 20:5036–5042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01196

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim TH et al (2020) Combating antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria strains with tetracycline-conjugated carbon nanoparticles. Adv Biosyst 4:e2000074. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202000074

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pinapati P, Joby JP, Cherukulappurath S (2020) Graphene oxide based two-dimensional optical tweezers for low power trapping of quantum dots and E coli bacteria. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:5107–5115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c00367

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang Y, Yang Y, Shi Y, Song H, Yu C (2020) Antibiotic-free antibacterial strategies enabled by nanomaterials: progress and perspectives. Adv Mater 32:e1904106. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904106

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rawson TM, Ming D, Ahmad R, Moore LSP, Holmes AH (2020) Antimicrobial use, drug-resistant infections and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:409–410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0395-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sun B et al (2021) Insight into the effect of particle size distribution differences on the antibacterial activity of carbon dots. J Colloid Interface Sci 584:505–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.015

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang B, Li J, Tang Z, Yang B, Lu S (2019) Near-infrared emissive carbon dots with 33.96% emission in aqueous solution for cellular sensing and light-emitting diodes. Sci Bulletin 64:1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.07.021

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xie Y, Zheng W, Jiang X (2020) Near-infrared light-activated phototherapy by gold nanoclusters for dispersing biofilms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:9041–9049. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b21777

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lin F, Bao Y-W, Wu F-G (2019) Carbon dots for sensing and killing microorganisms. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.3390/c5020033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wu H et al (2021) Carbon dots-confined CoP-CoO nanoheterostructure with strong interfacial synergy triggered the robust hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane. J Energy Chem 57:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li D et al (2020) Development of coinage metal nanoclusters as antimicrobials to combat bacterial infections. J Mater Chem B 8:9466–9480. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00549e

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ergene C, Yasuhara K, Palermo EF (2018) Biomimetic antimicrobial polymers: recent advances in molecular design. Polym Chem 9:2407–2427. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8py00012c

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang H et al (2021) Carbon dots with positive surface charge from tartaric acid and m-aminophenol for selective killing of Gram-positive bacteria. J Mater Chem B 9:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02332a

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dong X et al (2020) Photoexcited state properties and antibacterial activities of carbon dots relevant to mechanistic features and implications. Carbon 170:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Boobalan T et al (2020) Mushroom-derived carbon dots for toxic metal ion detection and as antibacterial and anticancer agents. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:5910–5919. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c01058

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang E et al (2020) Carbon dots@rGO paper as freestanding and flexible potassium-ion batteries anode. Adv Sci (Weinh) 7:2000470. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202000470

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang J et al (2019) One-step synthesis of carbon dots with bacterial contact-enhanced fluorescence emission: Fast Gram-type identification and selective Gram-positive bacterial inactivation. Carbon 146:827–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.040

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yang J et al (2016) Carbon dot-based platform for simultaneous bacterial distinguishment and antibacterial applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32170–32181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10398

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zapata RO et al (2008) Confocal laser scanning microscopy is appropriate to detect viability of Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentin. J Endod 34:1198–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang B et al (2020) Rational design of multi-color-emissive carbon dots in a single reaction system by hydrothermal. Adv Sci (Weinh) 8:2001453. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ru Y et al (2020) Recent advances in chiral carbonized polymer dots: from synthesis and properties to applications. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Alvarez YD et al (2013) Influence of gold nanoparticles on the kinetics of alpha-synuclein aggregation. Nano Lett 13:6156–6163. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403490e

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nguyen HA, Srivastava I, Pan D, Gruebele M (2020) Unraveling the fluorescence mechanism of carbon dots with sub-single-particle resolution. ACS Nano 14:6127–6137. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c01924

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sobhanan J et al (2020) Toxicity of nanomaterials due to photochemical degradation and the release of heavy metal ions. Nanoscale 12:22049–22058. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr03957h

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shen Z et al (2020) Biomembrane induced in situ self-assembly of peptide with enhanced antimicrobial activity. Biomater Sci 8:2031–2039. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm01785b

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li YJ et al (2016) Synthesis of self-assembled spermidine-carbon quantum dots effective against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Adv Healthc Mater 5:2545–2554. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hu C et al (2020) Dual-responsive injectable hydrogels encapsulating drug-loaded micelles for on-demand antimicrobial activity and accelerated wound healing. J Control Release 324:204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ran HH et al (2019) Multifunctional quaternized carbon dots with enhanced biofilm penetration and eradication efficiencies. J Mater Chem B 7:5104–5114. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb00681h

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ju J et al (2020) Designing robust, breathable, and antibacterial multifunctional porous membranes by a nanofluids templated strategy. Adv Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202006544

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Jinzhou Medical University for the instrument support.

Funding

This research was funded by the PhD. Start-up Fund of Science and Technology Department of Liaoning Province, China (201601363) and the Youth Fund of Education Department of Liaoning Province, China (JYTQN201712).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization was contributed by PZ; DL; methodology was contributed by PZ; software was contributed by PZ; KL; DYL; HQ; YE; MW; XM; validation was contributed by PZ; KL; DYL; HQ; YE; MW; JS; XM; DL; writing—original draft preparation, was contributed by PZ; DL; funding acquisition was contributed by XM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xifan Mei or Dan Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Figure S1: TEM (a),HR-TEM (b), and AFM (c, d) of the as-obtained CDs; Figure S2: SEM of CDscharacterized at four random times; Figure S3: (a) UV-vis, (b) the fluorescenceexcitation and emission spectra of the CDs; Figure S4: XPS survey (a) and FTIR ofthe as-obtained CDs; Table S1: Lifetime of the CDs and CDFs.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuang, P., Li, K., Li, D. et al. Assembly of Carbon Dots into Frameworks with Enhanced Stability and Antibacterial Activity. Nanoscale Res Lett 16, 121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03582-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carbon dots
  • Carbon dots-based frameworks
  • Bacteria
  • E. coli
  • S. aureus