Table 2 Validation of the LSPR-based method by comparing its performance with conventional tests
Methods | Positive | Negative | Sen (%) | Spc (%) | NPV (%) | PPV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Gold Standard | 20 | 20 | – | – | – | – |
B. SAT | ||||||
Positive | 18 | 1 | 90 | 95 | 90 | 94 |
Negative | 2 | 19 | ||||
C. IgG | ||||||
Positive | 17 | 1 | 85 | 95 | 90 | 89 |
Negative | 3 | 19 | ||||
D. IgM | ||||||
Positive | 16 | 2 | 80 | 90 | 91 | 88 |
Negative | 4 | 18 | ||||
E. LSPR | ||||||
Positive | 17 | 0 | 85 | 100 | 86 | 100 |
Negative | 3 | 20 |