Table 2 Comparison of gas sensing performance of ethanol and isopropanol
From: Ultra-High Response Detection of Alcohols Based on CdS/MoS2 Composite
Sensing materials | Target gas | Operating temperature (°C) | Concentration (ppm) | Response | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUM-CdS-3 | Ethanol | 230 | 100 | 20 | [41] |
CdS NWs | Ethanol | 206 | 100 | 14.9 | [16] |
Leaf-like CdS | Iso-propanol | 210 | 100 | 63 | [42] |
CdS nanoflakes | Iso-propanol | 225 | 200 | 76 | [17] |
MoS2-SnO2 | Ethanol | 280 | 200 | 119 | [23] |
SnO2-ZnO | Ethanol | 300 | 200 | 4.69 | [43] |
CuO/Cu2O | Ethanol | 260 | 1000 | 27 | [44] |
Ag-ZnSnO3 | Ethanol | 200 | 100 | 83.96 | [45] |
Au-ZnSnO3 | Ethanol | 200 | 100 | 15.5 | |
CdS/MoS2 BLs | Ethanol | 230 | 100 | 56 | This work |
Iso-propanol | 100 | 94 |