Table 2 Performance comparison of different ZnO-based UV PDs
materials | Bias (V) | Wavelength (nm) | Light intensity (mW/cm2) | R (A·W−1) | D* (Jones) | EQE (%) | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-ZnO/p-GaN | 0 | 274 | – | 1 × 10−6 | – | – | [47] |
ZnO/polyaniline/ZnGa2O4 | 0 | 365 | – | – | – | [48] | |
Mg doped p-GaN/PVA-ZnO | 0 | 350 | – | 2.25 × 10−5 | – | [49] | |
ZnO/PEDOT:PSS | 5 | 360 | 100 | 0.403 | 3.22 × 108 | – | [26] |
PANI/ZnO MW | − 3 | 350 | 0.037 | – | [17] | ||
Ppy-PEDOT:PSS/GaN NRs | 0 | 382 | 6.56 | 110 | 3.08 × 1013 | 4.0 × 105 | [50] |
ZnO-polyaniline | 3 | 365 | – | – | – | – | [15] |
ZnO/GQD/PEDOT:PSS | − 1 | 340 | – | 36 | – | – | [51] |
ZnO nanorods/polyaniline | 5 | 400 | 0.932 | 0.039 | – | 12.28 | [52] |
ZnO-NRs/GaN-NTs | 6 | 325 | 3.2 | 1204 | 1.84 × 1014 | 2.7 × 106 | [44] |
ZnO NRs/PEDOS | 2 | 365 | 0.3 | 247.7 | 3.50 × 1012 | 84,000 | This work |