Skip to main content

High-Efficient Spin Injection in GaN at Room Temperature Through A Van der Waals Tunnelling Barrier

Abstract

Achieving high-efficient spin injection in semiconductors is critical for developing spintronic devices. Although a tunnel spin injector is typically used, the construction of a high-quality tunnel barrier remains a significant challenge due to the large lattice mismatch between oxides and semiconductors. In this work, van der Waals h-BN films with the atomically flat interface were engaged as the tunnel barrier to achieve high spin polarization in GaN, and the spin injection and transport in GaN were investigated systematically. Based on the Hanle precession and magnetic resistance measurements, CoFeB was determined as an optimal spin polarizer, bilayer h-BN tunnelling barrier was proven to yield a much higher spin polarization than the case of monolayer, and appropriate carrier concentration as well as higher crystal equality of n-GaN could effectively reduce the defect-induced spin scattering to improve the spin transport. The systematic understanding and the high efficiency of spin injection in this work may pave the way to the development of physical connotations and the applications of semiconductor spintronics.

Introduction

Semiconductor spintronic devices, which combine electrical charge and spin as information carriers [1], bring new prospects for developing next-generation integrated circuits [2]. III-nitride semiconductors such as GaN, which are widely used in high-performance electronic and optoelectronic devices [3,4,5,6], are also promising candidates for energy-efficient spintronic applications. Electrical spin injection is a common route towards functionalized semiconductors spintronic devices [1]. To eliminate the conductivity mismatch between ferromagnetic metals (FM) and semiconductors [7, 8] and achieve high-efficient spin injection and transport, an extremely thin dielectric layer should be inserted as a tunnelling layer at the metal–semiconductor interface [9]. The conventional tunnelling layers used in spintronic devices are oxides, such as Al2O3 [5, 6, 10] and MgO [11,12,13], which can improve the tunnelling spin polarization by regulating the height of the tunnelling barriers [14,15,16]. However, achievement of high spin selectivity is still faced with difficulties including pinholes caused by non-uniform thickness of oxides [17, 18], and spin scattering induced by lattice mismatch [12].

Van der Waals tunnelling is considered an effective strategy to overcome the above problems. Recently, h-BN has been proven to be a promising alternative for the tunnelling layer due to its ultra-wide bandgap, controllable thickness, and high environmental stability [19]. Existing researches have also revealed that h-BN possesses an atomically flat surface free of dangling bond and charged impurity, resulting in consistent insulating property throughout the film [20, 21]. Even atomically thin h-BN can be utilized as an excellent dielectric layer with a high breakdown field [22]. Furthermore, as a two-dimensional layered material, h-BN provides a clean van der Waals interface that can well avoid the lattice mismatch during the subsequent growth of FM [23]. Theoretically, a first-principle study predicted a spin injection efficiency up to 100% in Ni/h-BN/graphene heterostructures [24]. Experimentally, a spin relaxation time of 56 ps ~ 1.86 ns could be achieved at room temperature (RT) [23, 25,26,27,28,29], with the highest spin polarization of 31% in graphene flakes [28]. Although h-BN has shown good performance in the spintronic devices with two-dimensional graphene [19], its application to other systems, especially to the three-dimensional semiconductors for spin injection, is devoid. Simultaneously, both h-BN and GaN are nitride materials, and some groups have well performed the epitaxy of h-BN on GaN [30, 31], which indicates a possibility for the in situ integrated growth of the whole spin injection structure including semiconductor and spin injector. This will shed more light on the development of spintronic devices. Besides of the tunnelling barrier, spin polarizer, and crystal quality of GaN are also crucial for the spin injection and resulted in spin polarization. In the reported FM/oxides/GaN systems, the FM with larger saturation magnetization and smaller coercivity showed the higher injection efficiency [32], and the GaN with lower defect level was beneficial for the spin transport [11, 33]. For achieving the high efficiency of spin injection in GaN with h-BN tunnelling barrier, the synergy among spin polarizer, h-BN tunnelling layer, carrier concentration and crystal quality of GaN should be investigated in a systematic manner.

In this paper, spin injection and transport in n-GaN at RT were studied by using FM/h-BN spin injector. The spin relaxation time and diffusion length with various ferromagnetic electrodes were compared through the three-terminal Hanle method. Based on the four-terminal non-local spin valves, the thicknesses of h-BN and the doping concentration as well as crystal quality of GaN were optimized. The physical mechanism for their influences on the spin injection and spin transport was revealed.

Materials and Methods

H-BN thin films were grown on Cu foil as substrate and catalyst at 1050 °C in a low-pressure chemical vapour deposition system, and ammonia borane was used as the precursor. The as-grown h-BN film was transferred onto GaN surface through a typical wet transfer method assisted by poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). A vacuum annealing at 400 °C was then carried out for half an hour to remove the residue. Electrode patterns of the three-terminal devices were constructed on GaN surface using the maskless laser direct writing technique, and the channel width was designed to be 50 μm, far beyond the spin diffusion length in GaN. The four-terminal spin valve devices were fabricated by using the electron beam lithography (EBL). The central two ferromagnetic electrodes of the four-terminal devices were, respectively, 500 nm and 800 nm in width and separated by a 600 nm channel. The two reference electrodes were 2 μm in width and 7 μm apart from the neighbouring ferromagnetic electrodes, respectively. Fe, Co, and CoFeB films with a thickness of about 20 nm were, respectively, deposited on GaN surfaces through the magnetron sputtering. The ferromagnetic electrodes were covered by a 50 nm Ru capping layer to prevent oxidation.

Optical morphology of the devices was observed on a Motic BA310Met-T microscope. Surface morphology of the h-BN on GaN was obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Carl Zeiss, Sigma-HD) and a atomic force microscope (AFM, Cypher S, Asylum Research). Raman spectrum was characterized on a Horiba LabRam HR Evolution confocal spectrometer with a 532 nm excitation laser combined with a × 100 objective confocal spectrometer. Crystalline characterization was performed on a field emission TEM (JEM-2100) operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Hysteresis loops of the FM films were detected on a vibrating sample magnetometer (LakeShore-7404). The current–voltage (I-V) curves were measured on a direct current (DC) power supply (Agilent B2901A). All the experiments were performed in air and at RT.

Results and Discussion

H-BN films grown by chemical vapour deposition (see Additional file 1: Fig. S1) were transferred onto the Ga-face GaN as the tunnelling layers. The morphology and structural properties closely associated with the spin injection were characterized. As shown in Fig. 1a, b, the optical micrograph, as well as the AFM image, illustrates a smooth surface of the h-BN tunnelling layer. From the height profile in the inset of Fig. 1b, the thickness is measured as ~ 0.49 nm, corresponding to a monolayer h-BN. Raman spectrum in the illustration of Fig. 1a exhibits a characteristic vibration peak at 1367 cm−1, suggesting a high crystal quality of the h-BN film. Owing to the lack of dangling bond, h-BN provided a clean and stress-free surface for the subsequent growth of spin injection material avoiding the problem of lattice mismatch. For instance, the Fe film displays a nice crystal equality when growing on h-BN/GaN surface, as demonstrated by the cross-sectional TEM image in Fig. 1c. The darker areas in the top and bottom represent the Fe and GaN layers, respectively, which are separated by a brighter BN layer in the middle. Atomically sharp interfaces of the three layers without visible interdiffusion can be clearly identified. The lattice fringes of the Fe film could be recognized from the high-resolution TEM. The interplanar spacings of the crystals are 0.204 nm and 0.167 nm, respectively, corresponding to the (110) and (111) planes of the body-centred cubic α-Fe lattice, and these crystal planes could also be distinguished from the fast Fourier transform (FFT) image in the insert and the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) image in Additional file 1: Fig. S2. Figure 1d depicts the hysteresis loops of the Fe film, where the in-plane and out-of-plane saturation magnetizations Ms are comparable, and the squareness ratio (Mr/Ms) is 0.16 and 0.02, respectively. The in-plane squareness is an order of magnitude higher than that of the out-of-plane, which indicates an in-plane magnetic anisotropy of the Fe film. The smooth and symmetric curves suggest a continuous rotation of the magnetic moment without pinning effect induced by the coarse domains. This also demonstrates a good crystal quality and magnetic property of the Fe film grown on h-BN.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(a) Optical micrograph of monolayer h-BN (denoted as ML h-BN in the figure) transferred on GaN (Inset: Raman spectrum of monolayer h-BN grown on copper foil); (b) AFM image and corresponding height profile of monolayer h-BN; (c) Cross-sectional TEM image of the Fe/h-BN/GaN spin injection structure (Inset: FFT image of the Fe region); (d) In-plane and out-of-plane hysteresis loops of the Fe film grown on h-BN/GaN (Inset: partial enlarged hysteresis loops near the zero point)

As demonstrated above, h-BN can form a superior sharp and clean interface with both GaN and FM material, which is to the benefit of high-efficient spin injection and transport. Based on the h-BN tunning layer, the three-terminal spin valves were constructed on n-GaN (carrier concentration of 1018 cm−3) to investigate the spin relaxation time and spin diffusion length, as shown in Fig. 2a. During the measurement, a magnetic field is applied in the perpendicular direction of the spin polarization plane. The spin precession at the Larmor frequency will cause spin dephasing, thus making the electrochemical potential difference Δμ decrease to zero with the external magnetic field Bz. By fitting the Hanle curve with Eqs. (1) and (2), the spin relaxation time τsf and spin diffusion length λsf can be obtained [34, 35].

$$\Delta \mu \left( {B_{z} } \right) = \frac{{\Delta \mu \left( 0 \right)}}{{(1 + \left( {\omega _{1} {\tau_{sf}} } \right)^{2} )}}$$
(1)
$${\lambda }_{sf}={(D{\tau }_{sf})}^{1/2}$$
(2)

where Δμ (0) is the electrochemical potential difference under zero magnetic field, ωl = BBz/ħ is the spin precession frequency (g = 1.94 is the Landé factor of GaN) [12], and D is the diffusion constant.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a) Schematic and optical image (inset) of the three-terminal spin valve devices; (b, c, d) Hanle curves of the Fe/h-BN/GaN, Co/h-BN/GaN, and CoFeB/h-BN/GaN three-terminal spin valve devices at RT, respectively

The spin injection is strongly dependent on the ferromagnetic electrodes. To clarify this influence, about 20 nm Fe, Co, and CoFeB injection electrodes with a Ru capping layer were, respectively, fabricated on GaN surface. By detecting the Hanle precession at RT, the performance of devices with the three different ferromagnetic electrodes is compared. Since the spin injection can be current and voltage dependent in a larger bias current, which is especially pronounced for h-BN tunnel barriers[36]. To eliminate this influence, a fixed and relatively smaller bias current of 10 μA is used during the measurement. As shown in Fig. 2b, c, the three-terminal device with Fe (Co) ferromagnetic electrode produces a 65 (52) μV spin accumulation signal. The calculated spin relaxation time and spin diffusion length are 42 (46) ps and 165 (173) nm, respectively, which are significantly increased than the cases of using the Al2O3 tunnelling layer [5, 6]. This is due to the smooth two-dimensional nature of the h-BN film and the sharp van der Waals interface for the Fe (Co)/h-BN/GaN trilayer. With respect to both Fe and Co, the device using CoFeB as a ferromagnetic electrode achieves the expected longest spin relaxation time of 51 ps and the largest spin diffusion length of 182 nm, as shown in Fig. 2d, which can be attributed to its high intrinsic spin polarization and better magnetic property (see Additional file 1: Fig. S3) [13].

Given the superior performance of the three-terminal device with CoFeB ferromagnetic electrode, the GaN-based four-terminal non-local spin valves with CoFeB/h-BN spin injector were further studied to reveal the spin injection efficiency. Furthermore, h-BN has been shown to be a preferred tunning layer, and its thickness was also optimized. The devices were constructed through the EBL followed by a magnetron sputtering of 20/50 nm CoFeB/Ru layer, as shown in Fig. 3a. Figure 3b displays the I-V curves detected on the central two terminals of the devices, and the results using monolayer and bilayer h-BN tunning barrier are compared. Both the I-V curves display clearly nonlinear properties, indicating the presence of a Schottky barrier at the tunnelling interface. The inset depicts the corresponding differential conductivities, where the parabolic shape is typical of tunnel junctions. It is worth noting that the device with a bilayer tunnelling layer shows a lower slope, indicative of a larger tunning barrier and a higher resistance than that with monolayer h-BN. During the magnetoresistance measurement, by applying a constant bias current to the left ferromagnetic electrode and reference electrode, the spin-polarized electrons are injected through h-BN into GaN. Since the middle injection and detection electrodes are designed with different aspect ratios (Fig. 3a), the magnetization orientation of the middle two electrons will be tuned between parallel and antiparallel when an in-plane magnetic field sweeps from + y to − y direction. Accordingly, the magnetic field-dependent voltage signals can be measured. To eliminate the influence from the background resistances, a high-precision constant current source and a lock-in amplifier are employed to collect the data during the measurement of magnetic resistance, to avoid the influence of spurious effects and make sure the accuracy of the results. With a 10 μA injected current (Iinject), the measured voltage changes (ΔV) under various in-plane magnetic fields are provided in Additional file 1: Fig. S4a, b, and the deduced non-local magnetic resistance signals (ΔR = ΔV/Iinject) are shown in Fig. 3c, d for the two devices, respectively. In the case of monolayer h-BN tunnelling barrier, the peak ΔR is about 5 Ω, while the device with bilayer h-BN exhibits a higher peak ΔR of 13 Ω, indicating a superior spin injection and transport performance of the latter.

Fig. 3
figure 3

(a) Schematic and optical image (inset) of the four-terminal spin valve devices; (b) Two-terminal I–V test at RT, where the black and red lines represent the devices with monolayer and bilayer h-BN (denoted as BL h-BN in the figure) as the tunnelling barriers, respectively; (c, d) ΔR as a function of in-plane magnetic field for the devices with monolayer and bilayer h-BN as the tunnelling barriers at RT, respectively

The spin-dependent magnetoresistance and spin polarization PJ comply the following relationship [11]:

$$\mathrm{\Delta R}= {P}_{J}^{2} \rho \frac{{\lambda }_{N}}{A}{\mathrm{ e}}^{-L/{\lambda }_{N}}$$
(3)

where ρ is the resistivity of GaN, λN is the spin diffusion length, A is the cross-sectional area of the transport current in GaN, and L = 600 nm is the distance between the spin injector and detector. Since the GaN thickness is far larger than the carrier diffusion length, we perform a theoretical simulation to reveal the effective cross-sectional area of the transport current (see Additional file 1: Fig. S5). By employing the above parameters (a effective cross-sectional area of 1.2 × 10–12 m2, a resistivity of 0.11 Ω·m for ~ 1018 cm−3 n-GaN measured through the four-probe method), the spin polarization is estimated to be about 9.0% and 14.5% for the two devices, respectively. To our knowledge, the spin polarization value with bilayer h-BN is higher than any previous report for the spin injection in GaN [5, 11,12,13]. There are two possible reasons for the better performance of bilayer h-BN. Firstly, the bilayer h-BN has a higher tunnelling potential barrier compared with the monolayer, which can well overcome the conductivity mismatch between the ferromagnetic electrode and semiconductor. Secondly, owing to the weak van der Waals interaction, the bilayer can better alleviate the roughness of the original GaN, providing a smoother surface for the subsequent growth of the ferromagnetic electrode. As a result, spin depolarization caused by the magnetostatic fringe field of the ferromagnetic electrode can be further reduced [23]. If further increased the thickness of h-BN layer, unavoidable breakage and contamination can be produced during the transfer process, which could induce more spin scattering in the interface and even suppress the spin polarization instead.

In addition to the significant role played by ferromagnetic electrodes and tunnelling barrier, the carrier concentration of GaN is critical to the spin transport. In this consideration, n-GaN with lower carrier concentrations was employed as the substrate, to compare the spin polarization with that of the ~ 1018 cm−3 n-GaN. Based on the four-terminal non-local spin valve device, the non-local ΔR as a function of in-plane magnetic field for CoFeB/ML h-BN/GaN (~ 1017 cm−3) is shown in Fig. 4a (the as-measured magnetic resistance curve is shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S4c), where the peak ΔR is about 9 Ω. By introducing the related parameters for the ~ 1017 cm−3 n-GaN, including the four-probe measured resistivity of 0.57 Ω·m, the effective cross-sectional area of 2 × 10–12 m2 (see Additional file 1: Fig. S5), and the spin diffusion length of 195 nm (derived from the Hanle measurement), the yielding spin polarization is about 5.9%. This value is 3.1% lower than the aforementioned ~ 1018 cm−3 n-GaN with monolayer h-BN tunnelling barrier. If the carrier concentration is further reduced, the spin transport and the polarization are intensively suppressed instead, leading to an undetectable signal (not shown). Normally, a lower carrier concentration has a weaker spin relaxation caused by the doping atoms, which should be beneficial to a higher spin polarization. However, the decreased carrier concentration can also reduce the conductive channels accessible for the spin transport, resulting in a lower spin polarization instead. Figure 4b displays the ΔR signal for the spin injection in free-standing single-crystal n-GaN (~ 1018 cm−3), with the measured ΔV provided in Additional file 1: Fig. S4d. The peak ΔR is increased to be as large as 37 Ω, which is much larger than that in GaN film grown on sapphire surface. This is attributed to the high quality of the free-standing GaN crystal, in which the defect-induced spin scattering is significantly restrained during the spin transport.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(a) ΔR dependence on the in-plane magnetic field for the grown n-GaN with a carrier concentration of ~ 1017 cm−3; (b) ΔR dependence on the in-plane magnetic field for the free-standing single-crystal n-GaN with a carrier concentration of ~ 1018 cm−3

Figure 5a summarizes the mechanism of the spin injection and transport dependence on the h-BN tunnelling barrier, and the carrier concentration as well as crystal equality of GaN. The systematic understanding and the maximal spin polarizations obtained at RT in MOCVD GaN film could be considered as a critical move for the practical applications of semiconductor spintronics.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Schematic showing the effects of h-BN layer number, carrier concentration and crystal equality of GaN on the spin injection and transport

Conclusions

In summary, spin injection in n-GaN was systematically studied with FM/h-BN spin injector at RT. By using CoFeB as the spin polarizer, the longer spin relaxation time and diffusion length were observed compared with that of Fe and Co spin polarizer. Based on the non-local spin valves measurements, CoFeB/h-BN/GaN with bilayer h-BN tunnelling barrier displayed a much higher spin polarization than the case of monolayer. Moreover, appropriate carrier concentration (~ 1018 cm−3), and better crystal quality of n-GaN could dramatically reduce the defect-induced spin scattering, resulting in a large improvement of the spin transport and spin polarization. Therefore, a record high spin polarization was achieved in the optimal CoFeB/h-BN/GaN structure at RT. All these results will open up broad prospects for the development of nitride-based spintronic devices.

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

H-BN:

Hexagonal boron nitride

GaN:

Gallium nitride

CoFeB:

Cobalt ferrum boron

FM:

Ferromagnetic metals

Al2O3 :

Aluminium oxide

MgO:

Magnesium oxide

RT:

Room temperature

PMMA:

Polymethyl methacrylate

EBL:

Electron beam lithography

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

AFM:

Atomic force microscope

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

I–V:

Current–voltage

DC:

Direct current

Ms :

Saturation magnetizations

Δμ :

Electrochemical potential difference

B z :

External magnetic field

τ sf :

Spin relaxation time

λ sf :

Spin diffusion length

Δμ (0):

Electrochemical potential difference under zero magnetic field

ω l :

Spin precession frequency

g :

Landé factor of GaN

μ B :

Bohr magneton

ħ :

Reduced Planck constant

D :

Diffusion constant

P J :

Spin polarization

ΔR:

Spin-dependent resistance signal

ΔV:

Voltage change

I inject :

Spin injection current

ρ :

The resistivity of GaN

λ N :

Spin diffusion length

A :

The cross-sectional area of the GaN

L :

The distance between the spin injector and detector

ML:

Monolayer

BL:

Bilayer

MOCVD:

Metal-organic chemical vapour deposition

References

  1. Wolf SA, Awschalom DD, Buhrman RA, Daughton JM, von Molnár S, Roukes ML, Chtchelkanova AY, Treger DM (2001) Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294:1488–1495

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirohata A, Takanashi K (2014) Future perspectives for spintronic devices. J Phys D 47:193001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura S (1998) The roles of structural imperfections in InGaN-based blue light-emitting diodes and laser diodes. Science 281:956–961

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta S, Das B (1990) Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator. Appl Phys Lett 56:665

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song A, Chen J, Lan J, Fu D, Zhou J, Zhong Z, Guo J, Wu X, Wu Y, Li X, Huang S, Wu Z, Kang J (2020) Modulating room temperature spin injection into GaN towards the highefficiency spin-light emitting diodes. Appl Phys Express 13:043006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Y, Chen J, Zhou J, Lan J, Zeng H, He B, Zhong Z, Guo J, Song A, Xia Y, Li X, Wu Z, Huang S, Kang J (2019) Regulating the circular polarization in nitride-based light-emitting diodes through the spin injection. Appl Phys Express 12:123005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Filip AT, Hoving BH, Jedema FJ, van Wees BJ, Dutta B, Borghs S (2000) Experimental search for the electrical spin injection in a semiconductor. Phys Rev B 62:9996–9999

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt G, Ferrand D, Molenkamp LW, Filip AT, van Wees BJ (2000) Fundamental obstacle for electrical spin injection from a ferromagnetic metal into a diffusive semiconductor. Phys Rev B 62:R4790–R4793

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meservey R, Tedrow PM (1994) Spin-polarized electron tunnelling. Phys Rep 238:173–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tombros N, Jozsa C, Popinciuc M, Jonkman HT, van Wees BJ (2007) Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature. Nature 448:571-U4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kum H, Heo J, Jahangir S, Banerjee A, Guo W, Bhattacharya P (2012) Room temperature single GaN nanowire spin valves with FeCo/MgO tunnel contacts. Appl Phys Lett 100:182407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharya A, Baten MZ, Bhattacharya P (2016) Electrical spin injection and detection of spin precession in room temperature bulk GaN lateral spin valves. Appl Phys Lett 108:042406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park TE, Park YH, Lee JM, Kim SW, Park HG, Min BC, Kim HJ, Koo HC, Choi HJ, Han SH, Johnson M, Chang J (2017) Large spin accumulation and crystallographic dependence of spin transport in single crystal gallium nitride nanowires. Nat Commun 8:15722

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen R, Dash SP, Sharma S, Min BC (2012) Silicon spintronics with ferromagnetic tunnel devices. Semicond Sci Technol 27:083001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rashba EI (2000) Theory of electrical spin injection Tunnel contacts as a solution of the conductivity mismatch problem. Phys Rev B 62:R16267–R16270

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fert A, Jaffrès H (2001) Conditions for efficient spin injection from a ferromagnetic metal into a semiconductor. Phys Rev B 64:184420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Teixeira JM, Ventura J, Carpinteiro F, Araujo JP, Sousa JB, Wisniowski P, Freitas PP (2009) The effect of pinhole formationgrowth on the tunnel magnetoresistance of MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions. J Appl Phys 106:073707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ventura J, Teixeira JM, Araujo JP, Sousa JB, Ferreira R, Freitas PP, Langer J, Ocker B, Maass W (2010) Influence of pinholes on MgO-tunnel junction barrier parameters obtained from current-voltage characteristics. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:2731–2734

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gurram M, Omar S, van Wees BJ (2018) Electrical spin injection, transport, and detection in graphene-hexagonal boron nitride van der Waals. 2D Mater 5:032004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee GH, Yu YJ, Lee C, Dean C, Shepard KL, Kim P, Hone J (2011) Electron tunnelling through atomically flat and ultrathin hexagonal boron nitride. Appl Phys Lett 99:243114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xue J, Sanchez-Yamagishi J, Bulmash D, Jacquod P, Deshpande A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Jarillo-Herrero P, Leroy BJ (2011) Scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy of ultra-flat graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat Mater 10:282–285

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Britnell L, Gorbachev RV, Jalil R, Belle BD, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI, Eaves L, Morozov SV, Mayorov AS, Peres NMR, Castro Neto AH, Leist J, Geim AK, Ponomarenko LA, Novoselov KS (2012) Electron tunnelling through ultrathin boron nitride crystalline barriers. Nano Lett 12:1707–1710

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh S, Katoch J, Xu J, Tan C, Zhu T, Amamou W, Hone J, Kawakami R (2016) Nanosecond spin relaxation times in single layer graphene spin valves with hexagonal boron nitride tunnel barriers. Appl Phys Lett 109:122411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Q, Shen L, Bai Z, Zeng M, Yang M, Huang Z, Feng YP (2014) Efficient spin injection into graphene through a tunnel barrier overcoming the spin-conductance mismatch. Phys Rev Appl 2:044008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi T, Inoue Y, Masubuchi S, Morikawa S, Onuki M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Moriya R, Machida T (2013) Electrical spin injection into graphene through monolayer hexagonal boron nitride. Appl Phys Express 6:073001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamalakar MV, Dankert A, Bergsten J, Ive T, Dash SP (2014) Enhanced tunnel spin injection into graphene using chemical vapor deposited hexagonal boron nitride. Sci Rep 4:6146

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu W, Makk P, Maurand R, Bräuninger M, Schönenberger C (2014) Large-scale fabrication of BN tunnel barriers for graphene spintronics. J Appl Phys 116:074306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamalakar MV, Dankert A, Kelly PJ, Dash SP (2016) Inversion of spin signal and spin filtering in ferromagnet|hexagonal boron nitride-graphene van der Waals heterostructures. Sci Rep 6:21168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gurram M, Omar S, Zihlmann S, Makk P, Li QC, Zhang YF, Schönenberger C, van Wees BJ (2018) Spin transport in two-layer-CVD-hBN/graphene/hBN heterostructures. Phys Rev B 97:045411

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo H, Funakawa S, Shen W, Sugino T (2003) Enhanced field emission of boron nitride nanofilms on roughened GaN substrates. Jpn J Appl Phys 42:L996–L998

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo H, Funakawa S, Shen W, Sugino T (2004) Field emission characteristics of BN nanofilms grown on GaN substrates. J Vac Sci Technol B 22:1958–1963

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jonker BT, Flatté ME (2006) Electrical spin injection and transport in semiconductors. Contemp Concepts Condens Matter Sci 1:227–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu X, Tang N, Fang C, Wan C, Zhang S, Zhang X, Guan H, Zhang Y, Qian X, Ji Y, Ge W, Han X, Shen B (2020) Spin relaxation induced by interfacial effects in n-GaN/MgO/Co spin injectors. RSC Adv 10:12547–12553

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dash SP, Sharma S, Patel RS, de Jong MP, Jansen R (2009) Electrical creation of spin polarization in silicon at room temperature. Nature 462:491–494

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhat SG, Kumar PSA (2014) Room temperature electrical spin injection into GaAs by an oxide spin injector. Sci Rep 4:6296

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gurram M, Omar S, van Wees BJ (2017) Bias induced up to 100% spin-injection and detection polarizations in ferromagnet/bilayer hBN/graphene/hBN heterostructures. Nat Commun 8:248

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Haiyang Liu and Weilin Hu for their help with the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (No. 62022068), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61874092 and 61974123), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China (20192BAB217013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DL, QW and AS completed sample preparation and data acquisition. DL wrote the first manuscript. WK, XW and GL helped to measure data.YW developed the original idea, analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. JW and JY performed the theoretical simulations. XL, ZW, DC and JK helped to analyze and interpret the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaping Wu, Xu Li or Zhiming Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Supplementary Information for SEM image of h-BN, IFFT image of the Fe region for the TEM image, hysteresis loops of the CoFeB film, the measured voltage signals for the spin valve devices and simulation of injected current distribution along the z direction of GaN film.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, D., Kang, W., Wu, Q. et al. High-Efficient Spin Injection in GaN at Room Temperature Through A Van der Waals Tunnelling Barrier. Nanoscale Res Lett 17, 74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-022-03712-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-022-03712-5

Keywords

  • Van der Waals tunnelling barrier
  • Boron nitride
  • Spin injection
  • Spintronic devices