Table 1 Comparison of various TiO2 nanostructures toward acetone gas sensing performances
From: High Sensing Performance Toward Acetone Vapor Using TiO2 Flower-Like Nanomaterials
Sensing materials | Working temperature (°C) | Concentration (ppm) | Response (Ra/Rg) | Response/recover time (s) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoporous TiO2 | 370 | 500 | 25.97 | 13/8 | [25] |
TiO2 nanoparticles | 400 | 200 | 7.5 | 240/180 | [33] |
Nano nanotube | 150 | 1000 | 2.08 | 21/38 | [34] |
TiO2 nanorods | 500 | 300 | 13 | 12/6 | [35] |
TiO2 nanoflowers | 280 | 200 | ~ 7 | < 50/< 100 | [36] |
Ag-TiO2 nanobelts | 260 | 500 | 28.25 | 6/8 | [24] |
Ag-TiO2 nanospheres | 350 | 500 | 29.1 | 1/47 | [14] |
TiO2 nanoparticles | 270 | 500 | 9.19 | 10/9 | [37] |
TiO2 microsphere | 320 | 100 | 6.9 | – | [38] |
Brookite TiO2 | 320 | 100 | 2.3 | 3/183 | [39] |
TiO2 FLNMs | 330 | 250 | 33.72 | 46/24 | This work |