Femtosecond Dynamics in Single Wall Carbon Nanotube/Poly(3-Hexylthiophene) Composites
© to the authors 2008
Received: 12 April 2008
Accepted: 11 July 2008
Published: 29 July 2008
Femtosecond transient absorption measurements on single wall carbon nanotube/poly(3-hexylthiophene) composites are used to investigate the relaxation dynamics of this blended material. The influence of the addition of nanotubes in polymer matrix on the ultrashort relaxation dynamics is examined in detail. The introduction of nanotube/polymer heterojunctions enhances the exciton dissociation and quenches the radiative recombination of composites. The relaxation dynamics of these composites are compared with the fullerene derivative-polymer composites with the same matrix. These results provide explanation to the observed photovoltaic performance of two types of composites.
The last two decades, the optical properties of single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have gained a great deal of interest [1–3]. The one-dimensional (1D) nature of nanotubes offers unique properties to their excitonic spectrum with many revolutionary applications [4, 5]. Many experimental techniques such as Raman scattering and electrical conductivity  have been employed for the investigation of optical and electronic properties of nanotubes with variable diameters and angle chilarities [7, 8]. Relaxation dynamics and nonlinear properties in these nanostructures are key issues in understanding and developing their optoelectronic properties. Ultrafast studies of carrier dynamics have been performed in SWNTs  reporting that this system has a dynamic response (<1 ps) one order of magnitude slower than in graphite (~130 fs) . When mixing the SWNTs with conjugated polymers, the donor/acceptor interfaces of polymer/nanotube act as dissociation heterojunctions for photoexcited excitons. These bulk heterojunction structures are presently believed to be the best approach for organic photovoltaics  and the advantage of this photoinduced charge generation  is evident with the enhancement of photocurrent in organic solar cells [4, 13]. Particularly, π-conjugated poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) has been of interest because of high carrier mobility, mechanical strength, thermal stability, and compatibility with fabrication process. However, the literature is lacking a comprehensive study of exciton and dissociated carrier (polarons and electrons) dynamics in these very promising composites for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications.
In this letter, transient absorption measurements [14, 15] with femtosecond resolution (~150 fs)  provides a means to investigate the ultrafast electron transfer from conjugated polymer to nanotubes and the involved radiative or nonradiative relaxations. We resolve the relaxation of excitons and dissociated carriers in SWNT/P3HT composites as a function of nanotube concentration. We have found that carrier relaxation within the valence and conduction bands of P3HT is beyond our resolution time (~150 fs) whereas the exciton dynamics have a double exponential relaxation. Furthermore, the electron–phonon interactions at the vibronic sidebands quench the radiative emission by introducing nonradiative relaxation channels. In addition, based on the observed ultrafast relaxation we present a comparison of SWNTs and [6,6]-phenylC61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) as mixture materials in the P3HT polymer matrix for their photovoltaic performance.
The utilized experimental technique in this work is a noncollinear super-continuum pump probe configuration in conjunction with a regenerative Ti:Sapphire amplifier system with 100 fs pulses at 800 nm. This system amplifies the pulses to approximately 1 mJ at a repetition rate of 1 kHz. The temporal resolution of our experimental setup over the entire probing wavelength range has been measured to be better than 150 fs. The temporal variation in the optical absorption was monitored as a change in the reflectivity and transmission, which was a direct measure of the photo-excited carrier dynamics within the probing region . In this work, optical pumping at a fluence of 2 mJ/cm2 was used to excite the composites and determine their temporal behavior. Here, we should point out that around this fluence nonlinear effects such as exciton–exciton annihilation were not observed in our experimental studies.
For the preparation of the samples in this work, P3HT (5 mg) was dissolved in 10 ml of dichlorobenzene inside a quartz pot which was kept over a hot plate at medium temperature. The initial volume of dichlorobenzene was noted and solvent was added if needed to replenish the evaporated amount. The P3HT solution was gently steered until all solid P3HT was dissolved. One milligram of HiPCO SWNTs (obtained from CNI) was separately dispersed in 40 ml of dichlorobenzene. HREM (using a JEOL 4000EXII) observations showed that the nanotube material was free from catalytic remnants and formed bundles containing of up to seven nanotubes each. According to current literature, the HiPCO SWNTs are 1/3 metallic and 2/3 semiconducting. We have not performed any additional purification. Appropriate amounts of P3HT and SWNTs were mixed from solution and the composites were ultrasonically agitated so long as to reach a uniform solution. Thin layers of the materials were deposited on quartz substrates by drop casting. The total mass of the deposited materials and the surface of the quartz substrates were kept the same to insure that the resulting films had similar thicknesses. Processing and measurements were performed under ambient conditions.
The dispersion of SWNTs in the composites was examined by HREM using the JEOL 2000EX II microscope and we did not notice any difference compared to the pure SWNTs. In addition, I V measurements revealed a percolation threshold of 0.75 wt.% which denotes good dispersion of the SWNTs in line with current bibliography .
Results and Discussion
The decrease in the P3HT absorption is most likely due to the fact that there is less P3HT in the sample (65% SWNT means that only 35% of the sample is P3HT, and the total sample mass is kept constant). Due to various interactions that exist between the two materials (donor–acceptor system) one will expect different relaxation dynamics.
In addition to monitoring state filling and the subsequent exciton relaxation, the probing beam may cause secondary re-excitations to energetically higher energy states. Secondary absorption probably is present at all probing wavelengths, but it is more pronounced at 550 nm, a wavelength close to the strong second vibronic sideband absorption (see Fig 2). Figure 3 shows transient absorption for a time window of 400 ps. The photoinduced absorption (PA) signal for delay times longer than 50 ps (see 500 nm probing wavelength in Fig. 3, indicated by anarrow) is manifested by the absorption signal becoming positive. Increasing the probing wavelength to 700 nm the energy of the probing photons is less than the HOMO-LUMO energy gap. Since the density of states follows a Gaussian-like distribution there are states in the energy gap which result in weak absorption (see Fig. 2, arrow (4)). Following excitation with the 400 nm laser pulse, we observe an increase in absorption at 700 nm (1.77 eV). This means that we are re-exciting carriers from an energy level that is occupied after the absorption by the excitation photons. The exact location of the involved energy level is not easy to pinpoint. However, if we create a mirror image of the transient absorption at 700 nm with respect to the time delay axis, the resulting curve (shown in Fig. 3 as a continuum black line throughout the data) depict similar dynamics as the 600 nm transient absorption data. This suggests that the 700 nm probe re-excites carriers between the LUMO and a state 1.77 (700 nm) above it (for electrons).
Following the initial excitation by the 400 nm photons, the probing 600 nm beam monitors the population of excitons at the energy state located 2 eV above the HOMO. As the nanotube concentration increases, the fast exponential decay becomes progressively faster. This means that excitonic relaxation is indeed enhanced by the presence of nanotubes. We propose that exciton dissociation is amplified at the nanotube-polymer bulk heterojunctions due to the presence of the inherent field at these junctions. From the experimental data in Fig. 4, it is obvious that the nanotubes act as dissociation centers for the excitons minimizing the radiative recombination (smaller stretched decay). The variation in exciton dissociation efficiency can be represented numerically by plotting the fast decay time as a function of nanotube concentration in the inset of Fig. 4. Here, we note that this behavior remains the same for all the probing wavelengths used in this work.
The transient absorption signal of a pure carbon nanotube sample is also shown for comparison in Fig. 4. The signal consists of two contributions: a fast negative transient lasting for a very short period of time and a positive contribution that lasts for the remaining of the measured delay time period. Absorption of the pump pulse (≈3.1 eV) creates a population of excitonic states which gradually relax to lower energies before electrons and holes recombine. The fast recovery to positive absorption suggests subsequent secondary excitations by the 600 nm probing wavelength. One cannot be certain the starting (base) and final energy levels involved here, we can only be certain that the energy difference is about 2 eV. In the remaining of delay times, our transient provides an account of the decrease in the population of the base energy level of the re-excitation.
In conclusion, we have studied ultrafast transient absorption on P3HT/carbon nanotube composites up to 65% SWNT concentration. Linear absorption measurements in these composites give an important insight of excitonic and vibronic sidebands. The experimental transient absorption along with the optical absorption measurements reveal that state filling effect and PA take place in these composites. We have found that carrier relaxation within the valence and conduction bands of P3HT is beyond our resolution time (~150 fs) whereas the exciton dynamics have a double exponential relaxation. We have found that the electron–phonon interactions at the vibronic sidebands quench the radiative emission by introducing nonradiative relaxation channels. The addition of nanotubes in these composites alters the relaxation dynamics of formed excitons dissociating these at short time scale and introducing new free-carrier relaxation paths for electrons and polarons through nanotubes and P3HT chains, respectively. Exciton dissociation is accelerated with the concentration of carbon nanotubes strongly suggesting that dissociation takes place at the nanotube-polymer heterojunctions. Furthermore, even at high nanotube concentrations, the pump pulse is predominantly absorbed by the polymer albeit a strong influence by polymer-nanotube heterojunctions on transient absorption of the probe beam. This behavior could be justified by comparing the absorption strength of both materials at 400 nm.
Finally, it is well known in the filed of photovoltaic applications that solar cells based on SWNT-P3HT composites do not work well, although SWNT coatings might be useful as transparent electrodes. The evidence in this work suggests that this failing of the SWNTs is not due to lack of exciton dissociation, since we observe shorter exciton lifetimes as the amount of SWNT is increased. This means that maybe other factors, like recombination of charge carriers in nanotubes or polymer chains, are responsible for their poorer performance in these photovoltaics. On the other hand, in preview work  we have reported that PCBM-P3HT composites have also a fast exciton dissociation time which quenches the radiative recombination of the polarons/excitons, and increases the yield of photogenerated charged excitations from the PCBM-related states. With increasing the PCBM concentration in the blended materials in that work, we have observed that the relaxation times increase as opposed to the relaxation dynamics upon increasing the SWNT concentration in the same P3HT matrix. We believe that this important difference is responsible for the higher photovoltaic performance of PCBM-P3HT compared with the SWNT-P3HT composite.
The work in this article was partially supported by the research programs ERYAN/0506/04 and ERYNE/0506/02 funded by the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation in Cyprus.
- Dresselhaus MS: Nature. 1992, 358: 195. 10.1038/358195a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ijima S: Nature. 1991, 354: 56. 10.1038/354056a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM: Nature. 1996, 381: 678. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjslGmt7k%3D] 10.1038/381678a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kymakis E, Alexandrou I, Amaratunga GAJ: J. Appl. Phys.. 2003, 93: 1764. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtVKjtLk%3D] 10.1063/1.1535231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kymakis E, Amaratunga GAJ: J. Appl. Phys.. 2006, 99: 084302. 10.1063/1.2189931View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kymakis E, Alexandrou I, Amaratunga GAJ: Synth. Met.. 2002, 127: 59. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhvFOmsbc%3D] 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00592-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spataru CD, Ismail-Beigi S, Benedict LX, Louie SG: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2004, 92: 077402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.077402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang E, Bussi G, Ruini A, Molinari E: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2004, 92: 196401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.196401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lauret J-S, Voisin C, Cassabois G, Delalande C, Roussignol P, Jost O, et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2003, 90: 057404. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.057404View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seibert K, et al.: Phys. Rev. B. 1990, 42: 2842. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXlvVagur8%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.2842View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Othonos A, Alexandrou I, Hayashi Y: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 102: 083104. 10.1063/1.2799049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Othonos A, Alexandrou I, Hayashi Y: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2007, 91: 111117. 10.1063/1.2785120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- H. Hoppe, S. Shokhovets, G. Gobsch, Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. (RRL) 1, R40 (2007)Google Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Nassiopoulou AG, Othonos A: Semicond. Sci. Technol.. 2006, 21: 1041. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xpt1eisr0%3D] 10.1088/0268-1242/21/8/010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Othonos A, Lioutas CB, Vouroutzis N: Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2008, 3: 1. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlslejsLw%3D] 10.1007/s11671-007-9105-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Adamou K, Othonos A: Opt. Eng.. 2005, 44: 034203. 10.1117/1.1873432View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lioudakis E, Nassiopoulou AG, Othonos A: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2007, 90: 171103. 10.1063/1.2728756View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biercuk MJ, et al.: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2002, 80: 2767. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XivVWgtrg%3D] 10.1063/1.1469696View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Sfeir MY, Huang L, Huang XMH, Wu Y, Kim J, et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2006, 96: 167401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.167401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwon YK, Saito S, Tomanek D: Phys. Rev. B. 1998, 58: R13314. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXntlClurc%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R13314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A.A. Maarouf, C.L. Kane, E.J. Mele, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11 156 (2000)Google Scholar
- Reich S, Thomsen C, Ordejon P: Phys. Rev. B. 2002, 65: 155411. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.155411View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell MJ, Sivaram S, Doorn SK: Phys. Rev. B. 2004, 69: 235415. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.235415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA: Science. 2002, 297: 787. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlvVyhsrw%3D] 10.1126/science.1060928View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell MJ, Bachilo SM, Huffman CB, Moore VC, Strano MS, Haroz EH, et al.: Science. 2002, 297: 593. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlslWrsrY%3D] 10.1126/science.1072631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- E. Lioudakis, C. Kanari, A. Othonos, I. Alexandrou, Diamond Relat. Mater. (2008). doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2008.01.028Google Scholar
- E. Lioudakis, A. Othonos, Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. (RRL) 2, 19 (2008). doi:10.1002/pssr.200701219Google Scholar