- Nano Express
- Open Access
Biological Synthesis of Size-Controlled Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles Using ImmobilizedRhodobacter sphaeroides
Nanoscale Research Lettersvolume 4, Article number: 717 (2009)
Size-controlled cadmium sulfide nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by immobilizedRhodobacter sphaeroides in the study. The dynamic process that Cd2+was transported from solution into cell by livingR. sphaeroides was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Culture time, as an important physiological parameter forR. sphaeroides growth, could significantly control the size of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles. TEM demonstrated that the average sizes of spherical cadmium sulfide nanoparticles were 2.3 ± 0.15, 6.8 ± 0.22, and 36.8 ± 0.25 nm at culture times of 36, 42, and 48 h, respectively. Also, the UV–vis and photoluminescence spectral analysis of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles were performed.
Biosynthesis of nanomaterials as a novel nanoparticle synthesizing technology attracts increasing attention. It is well known that many organisms can provide inorganic materials either intra- or extracellularly [1, 2]. For example, unicellular organisms such as magnetotactic bacteria produce magnetite nanoparticles , and diatoms synthesize siliceous materials . Even live plants such as Alfalfa are able to produce gold clusters surrounded by a shell of organic ligands . Bansal et al.  have synthesized 4–5 nm barium titanate (BT) nanoparticles using a fungus-mediated approach. As far as the biosynthesis of cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanoparticles is concerned, a number of biosynthesis methods have been reported. For example, CdS nanoparticles can be synthesized intracellularly by the yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe. However, intracellular synthesis of CdS nanoparticles makes the job of downstream processing difficult and beats the purpose of developing a simple and economical process. The extracellular enzyme secreted by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum can mediate extracellular synthesis of CdS nanoparticles . But live organisms have the endogenous ability to exquisitely regulate synthesis of inorganic materials. For example, shape control of inorganic materials in biological systems was achieved either by formation of membrane vesicles  or through functional molecules such as aluminophosphates and polypeptides that bonded specifically to mineral surfaces . On the other hand, the size, shape, and yield of biosynthesized nanoparticles significantly depend on physiological parameters, and remarkably are affected by growth conditions (including pH, temperature, culture time, and metal ions concentration) of live organisms. For example, gold nanowires with a network structure can be synthesized with the change of HAuCl4 concentration by Rhodopseudomonas capsulate, and triangular gold nanoplates can be produced with adjusting the pH of initial solution by Rhodopseudomonas capsulate. The exploitation of size- and shape-controlled biosynthesis of CdS nanoparticles using live photosynthetic bacteria is so far unexplored and underexploited. In this study, prokaryote photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides, recognized as one of the ecologically and environmentally important microorganisms, commonly existing in the natural environment, were investigated for producing CdS at room temperature with a single step process. Especially CdS nanoparticles were formed intracellularly and then were transported into extracellular solution. In addition, immobilized R. sphaeroides can be separated from cadmium sulfide nanoparticles easily.
Organism and Cultivation
Rhodobacter sphaeroides were obtained from College of Life Science and Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China. R. sphaeroides were cultured in the medium containing (in 1 L) 2.0 g malic sodium, 0.15 g MgSO4 · 7H2O, 1.2 g yeast extract, and 1.5 g (NH4)2SO4 at pH 7 and 30 °C . The bacteria were cultured for 72 h and separated from broth by centrifugation (5000 rpm) at 4 °C for 10 min. The collected bacteria were washed five times with distilled water to obtain about 1 g wet weight of bacteria.
Preparation of ImmobilizedRhodobacter sphaeroides
The concentrated pure-culture R. sphaeroides were then mixed with polyvinylalcohol (PVA) (10 g PVA/100 mL distilled water). The initial concentration of cells was 30 mg/L. The gel beads with wrapped microbial cells were formed in a solution of 10% H3BO3, and the average diameter was about 3 mm. The beads were “annealed” in the H3BO3 solution for 18 h. After activation in growth medium, the immobilized beads were washed twice with distilled water and were prepared for use .
Biological Synthesis of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles
Synthesis was conducted in a 1000 mL sterile serum bottle containing 20 g immobilizedR. sphaeroides and 500 culture medium of 1.0 mM CdCl2. The resulting solution was incubated at 30 °C under the dark and aerobic (DO = 5 mg L−1) conditions for 36 h. After the bio-transformation reaction was completed, the precipitate was washed several times with distilled water. The final precipitate was dried at 50 °C for 3 h in a vacuum kiln. The products were obtained in about 85% yield based on Cd.
The CdS nanoparticles synthesized by immobilized R. sphaeroides were used for powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The spectra were recorded on a Rigaku Dmax-γA automatic instrument. The diffracted intensities were recorded from 10° to 70° 2θ angles. The sample was prepared by drop coating onto a carbon-coated copper grid for transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED). TEM was performed on a Hitachi H-600 instrument operated at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV while HRTEM and SAED were performed on a Hitachi H-2010 instrument operated at a lattice image resolution of 0.14 nm. The cells were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), using a 100CX scanning transmission electron microscope and a Kevex 8000 EDX system. The cell samples were prepared as previously described . Ultraviolet and visible (UV–vis) absorption spectrum was collected at room temperature on Shimadzu UV-2101PC using BaSO4 powder as a standard. The photoluminescence emission and excitation spectra were recorded with a Hitachi F-850 fluorescence spectrometer.
Different Forms of Cadmium Separated by Different Centrifugation Speed
Nanocrystal formation was initiated by adding CdCl2 (1 mM) to a cell sample (about 1 g wet weight) suspended in growing medium. The solutions were incubated on an orbital shaker at 30 °C and agitated at 150 rpm. Samples were taken at predefined time intervals (0, 12, 24, 36, 42, and 48 h). The sample was centrifuged at 4000×g for 20 min. The biomass pellet (P1) was collected and the medium without cells was centrifuged at 15000×g at 4 °C for 60 min. The supernatant (S1) was collected, and the pellet (P2) with the CdS-containing particles was washed with deionized water three times. Each experiment was repeated three times. The contents of cadmium in different forms of P1, S1, and P2 were determined using Shimadzu AA-6300 atomic absorption spectrophotometer in an air-acetylene flame at 228.8 nm wavelength .
Cysteine Desulfhydrase Assay
Cysteine desulfhydrase activity of the cell was measured using a colorimetric assay adapted from Chu et al. . Samples of R. sphaeroides were centrifuged at 4000×g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in phosphate buffer (10 mM, 1 ml, pH 7.5). The reaction was started by the addition of Tris (0.1 M buffered to pH 7.6) and cysteine hydrochloride (100 mM, pH 8.6), then the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Sulfide formation was determined by adding N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate (20 mM, in 7.2 M HCl) and FeCl3 (30 mM, in 7.2 M HCl) to the reaction tubes. Absorbance was measured at 650 nm and the concentration of sulfide was determined according to a standard sodium sulfide calibration curve. Total protein was measured by the method of Chen et al. .
Results and Discussion
Biosynthesis of CdS Nanoparticles
Figure 1displays the XRD pattern of the CdS synthesized by immobilizedR. sphaeroides at 42 h. Three diffraction peaks at ca. 26.58, 44.16, and 52.39 can be indexed as cubic CdS (1 1 1), (2 2 0), and (3 1 1) faces by comparison with the data from JCPDS file no. 42-1411, which indicates that CdS nanoparticles have been successfully prepared by immobilizedR. sphaeroides. The widened peaks imply a small particle size of the product. According to Debye-Scherrer equation, the mean grain size is calculated to be approximately 4.3 nm. Typical EDX pattern shows that the CdS nanoparticles are composed of the elements Cd and S, and the ratio of Cd:S is 0.97:1.00, being in with the expected value.
A representative HRTEM image at low amplificatory times of the CdS nanoparticles obtained at 42 h is given in Fig. 2a. The particles are essentially spherical, and the average particle size is 6.8 ± 0.20 nm selecting one hundred particles of TEM. However, HRTEM at high amplificatory times shows that the nanocrystals have a size of 4.3 nm at the place I. The size of nanocrystals observed by HRTEM at high amplificatory times is smaller than that at low amplificatory times due to a few gathered nanocrystals. HRTEM at high amplificatory times and lattice images reveal that the nanocrystals are cubic with ad spacing of 0.36 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane of cubic CdS (Fig. 2b, c). The SAED pattern of these particles indicates that they are the face-centered cubic (fcc) crystalline structure (Fig. 2d).
Biosynthesis Kinetics of CdS
To understand the synthesis process of CdS in a greater detail, the kinetics of the formation of CdS by livingR. sphaeroides exposed to 1 mM CdCl2culture medium at 30 °C was followed by TEM. Figure 3a, b shows the thin sections of CdS nano-R. sphaeroides cell as a function of reaction time. At the beginning of reaction, the Cd cannot be seen (Fig. 3a). At very early stage of reaction, the Cd can be seen as dense population from the TEM images (Fig. 3b). The result indicates that only a little of Cd2+is carried into theR. sphaeroides cells. After 24 h of reaction, the relative quantity of Cd2+are transported into the cell and result in the increasing of Cd2+(Fig. 3c), but little CdS deposits are obtained from extracellular resolution, and most of Cd2+are in solution (Fig. 4). At 36 h, a lot of Cd2+is carried into the cell (Fig. 3d), much CdS deposits are gained from extracellular resolution, and Cd2+in solution are reduced to half of initial concentration (Fig. 4). At 42 h, the intracellular Cd decreases (Fig. 3e), and a large population of CdS are visible in extracellular solution (Fig. 4). At 48 h, the intracellular CdS is little (Fig. 3f), and the CdS in extracellular resolution are observed in large population (Fig. 4). The dynamic process of intracellular Cd (including Cd2+and CdS) transported by livingR. sphaeroides, characterized by TEM, is allowed for the observation of key intermediates and characteristics of the carrying process of Cd2+from solution into cell.
At the same time, the chemical analysis of cell ultra thin section ofR. sphaeroides was performed by EDS. Figure 5shows X-ray EDS analysis ofR. sphaeroides cultivated in culture medium in the absence or in the presence of 1 mM Cd2+(circled in red, Fig. 3a, d). The strong signals in Fig. 5b indicate the presence of Cd and S, and the ratio of Cd:S is 0.97:1.00. The result shows that the deposit of CdS has been synthesized in cells. However, there are not the signals of Cd and S in Fig. 5a. The presence of C and O in Fig. 5suggests the biomolecules in theR. sphaeroides cells.
Size-Controlled Biosynthesis of CdS Nanoparticles
The growing phase of cells was found to be an important factor in modulating the morphology of CdS nanoparticles because they evidently affected the physiological parameters of living E. coli. Figure 6 shows TEM images of the CdS nanoparticles formed by living immobilized R. sphaeroides exposed to 1 mM culture medium of CdCl2 at different culture times. The spherical CdS nanoparticles with the average size of 2.3 ± 0.15, 6.8 ± 0.22, and 36.8 ± 0.25 nm were formed at 36, 42, and 48 h, respectively, which indicates that the size of CdS nanoparticles increases with the increasing culture time.
Previous studies indicated that cysteine desulfhydrase was an important factor in the biosynthesis of metal sulfide nanoparticles . Also, we had confirmed that R. sphaeroides could secrete cysteine desulfhydrase (C–S-lyase) being responsible for producing S2−. The result shows that the activity of cysteine desulfhydrase in R. sphaeroides depends on culture time, and the activities at 36, 42, and 48 h are 32.6, 45.1, and 50.8 U g−1, respectively. Namely, the activity of C–S-lyase at 36 h is lower than the ones at 42 h and 48 h. Hence, the reaction rate between cadmium ions and S2− is very slow at 36 h, resulting in the formation of CdS nanoparticles with small diameter. With the increasing culture time, the enzyme activities and reaction rate correspondingly increase, contributing to the formation of thermodynamic-favored spherical particles. Thus, the size-controlled biosynthesis of CdS nanoparticles using immobilized R. sphaeroides could be obtained by simply changing the culture time.
Optical Properties of CdS Nanoparticles
Moreover, the samples obtained at different culture times exhibit excellent optical properties (see Fig. 7). The absorption peaks of the products obtained at 36 and 42 h are about 282 and 332 nm. The absorption peaks of CdS are blue-shifted from the absorption peak of bulk CdS (512 nm, Eg = 2.43 eV). According to the spectrum, we estimate the bandgap of CdS varied from 2.32 to 3.56 eV when the grain size reduces from 6.8 ± 0.22 to 2.3 ± 0.15 nm. This clearly indicates the presence of quantum size effects in the prepared CdS by the novel and simple route. However, the product obtained at 48 h with the grain size 36.8 ± 0.25 nm has a weak absorption at 506 nm, which is near the absorption peak of bulk CdS .
The photoluminescence spectra measurements of CdS nanoparticles synthesized at 36 and 42 h were carried using the same excitation wavelength of 345 nm at room temperature (see Fig. 8). The emission peaks at 382 and 406 nm correspond to the samples obtained at 36 and 42 h, respectively. The emission peaks at 382 and 406 nm are usually observed from the excitonic emission luminescence of semiconductor nanoparticles . With increasing culture time, the fluorescence intensity remarkably decreases and the emission peak is red shifted. The result shows the change of bandgap of CdS nanoparticles and the presence of size-dependent quantum confinement effects.
The present study demonstrated that size-controlled CdS nanoparticles had been synthesized by living immobilizedR. sphaeroides. Also, the result showed thatR. sphaeroides could transport Cd2+into cell from solution and then produced CdS. Finally, the CdS was carried to the extracellular solution and formed nanoparticles. The size of CdS nanoparticles biosynthesized by living immobilizedR. sphaeroides could vary with the culture time. The way of the size-controlled biosynthesis of CdS nanoparticles by simply changing culture time provides a fully green approach for the biosynthesis modulation of nanomaterials. Moreover, the UV–vis absorption spectra and photoluminescence spectra showed that CdS nanoparticles exhibited unique optical properties.
Simkiss K, Wilbur KM: Biomineralization. Academic Press, New York; 1989.
Mann S (Ed): Biomimetic Materials Chemistry. VCH Press, New York; 1996.
Philipse AP, Maas D: Langmuir. 2002, 18: 9977. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XosVCis7w%3D] 10.1021/la0205811
Kroger N, Deutzmann R, Sumper M: Science. 1999, 286: 1129. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnt1Kltbw%3D] 10.1126/science.286.5442.1129
Ascencio JA, Mejia Y, Liu HB: Langmuir. 2003, 19: 5882. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXksFGiurY%3D] 10.1021/la0340495
Bansal V, Poddar P, Ahmad A, Sastry M: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2006, 128: 11958. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XosVCitrc%3D] 10.1021/ja063011m
Kowshik M, Deshmukh N, Vogel W, Urban J, Kulkarni SK, Paknikar KM: Biotechnol. Bioeng.. 2002, 78: 583. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjvV2mtbk%3D] 10.1002/bit.10233
Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Mandal D, Senapati S, Khan MI, Kumar R, Sastry M: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2002, 124: 12108. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xns1Cku74%3D] 10.1021/ja027296o
Lang C, Schǘler D, Faivre D: Macromol. Biosci.. 2007, 7: 144. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXisVylsLY%3D] 10.1002/mabi.200600235
Komeili A, Vali H, Beveridge TJ, Newman DK: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004, 101: 3839. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXis1Kgur0%3D]; Bibcode number [2004PNAS..101.3839K] 10.1073/pnas.0400391101
He SY, Zhang Y, Guo ZR, Gu N: Biotechnol. Prog.. 2008, 24: 476. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitleis70%3D] 10.1021/bp0703174
He SY, Guo ZR, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang J, Gu N: Mater. Lett.. 2007, 61: 3984. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVClsbk%3D] 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.018
Yao ZY, Zhang ZM: Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol.. 1996, 2: 84.
Nagadomih H, Hiromitsu T, Takeno K, Watanabe M, Sasaki K: J. Biosci. Bioeng.. 1999, 87: 189. 10.1016/S1389-1723(99)89011-2
Wang CL, Clark DS, Keasling JD: Biotechnol. Bioeng.. 2001, 75: 285. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnvFSisLw%3D] 10.1002/bit.10030
Chu L, Ebersole JL, Kurzban GP, Holt SC: Infect. Immun.. 1997, 65: 3231.
Sweeney RY, Mao C, Gao X, Burt JL, Belcher AM, Georgiou G, Iverson BL: Chem. Biol.. 2004, 11: 1553. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVWjsbbN] 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.08.022
Bai HJ, Zhang ZM, Yang GE, Li BZ: Bioresour. Technol.. 2008, 99: 7716. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXns1akt7Y%3D] 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.071
Datta A, Saha A, Sinha AK, Bhattacharyyaa SN, Chatterjee S: J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2005, 78: 69. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1Sl] 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2004.10.001
We acknowledge the service rendered by the Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility, Institute of Coal Chemistry, CAS, Taiyuan, China, in analyzing the samples by TEM. Financial supports from the Shanxi Provincial Key Technology R&D Program of Shanxi (No. 20080311027-1), and National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (No. 2001BA540C) are gratefully acknowledged.