Efficient manganese luminescence induced by Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer in rare earth fluoride and phosphate nanocrystals
© Ding et al; licensee Springer. 2011
Received: 10 May 2010
Accepted: 4 February 2011
Published: 4 February 2011
Manganese materials with attractive optical properties have been proposed for applications in such areas as photonics, light-emitting diodes, and bioimaging. In this paper, we have demonstrated multicolor Mn2+ luminescence in the visible region by controlling Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer in rare earth nanocrystals [NCs]. CeF3 and CePO4 NCs doped with Mn2+ have been prepared and can be well dispersed in aqueous solutions. Under ultraviolet light excitation, both the CeF3:Mn and CePO4:Mn NCs exhibit Mn2+ luminescence, yet their output colors are green and orange, respectively. By optimizing Mn2+ doping concentrations, Mn2+ luminescence quantum efficiency and Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer efficiency can respectively reach 14% and 60% in the CeF3:Mn NCs.
The preparation of fluorescent nanomaterials continues to be actively pursued in the past decades. The potentially broad applicability and high technological promise of the fluorescent nanomaterials arise from their intrinsically intriguing optical properties, which are expected to pale their bulk counterparts [1–4]. Particularly, controllable energy transfer in the nanomaterials has been receiving great interest because it leads luminescence signals to outstanding selectivity and high sensitivity, which are important factors for optoelectronics and optical sensors .
Great efforts have been devoted to Mn2+-doped semiconductor nanocrystals [NCs] due to their efficient sensitized luminescence [6, 7]. When incorporating Mn2+ ions in a quantum-confined semiconductor particle, the Mn2+ ions can act as recombination centers for the excited electron-hole pairs and result in characteristic Mn2+ (4T1-6A1)-based fluorescence. Compared with the undoped materials, the Mn2+-doped semiconductor NCs often have higher fluorescence efficiency, better photochemical stability, and prolonged fluorescence lifetime. Therefore, such Mn2+-doped NCs have recently been proposed as bioimaging agents [8, 9] and recombination centers in electroluminescent devices [10, 11]. They may even find applications in future spin-based information processing devices [12, 13] and have been examined as models for magnetic polarons . Moreover, as emission centers, Mn2+ ions can be used for the synthesis of long persistent phosphors [15, 16], and white-light ultraviolet light-emitting diodes , when doped in inorganic host materials (such as silicate, aluminate, and fluoride).
Rare earth ions (such as Ce3+ and Eu2+) have been commonly used as sensitizers to improve Mn2+ fluorescence efficiency in bulk materials [18–20]. Typically, the efficient room temperature [RT] luminescence were reported in the Mn2+, Ce3+ co-doped CaF2 single crystal and other matrixes, which were assigned to the energy transfer from the Ce3+ sensitizers to the Mn2+ acceptors through an electric quadrupole short-range interaction in the formed Ce3+-Mn2+ clusters . However, a portion of isolated Ce3+ and Mn2+ ions which are randomly dispersed in the host usually causes a low Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer efficiency.
In this work, we have synthesized the CeF3:Mn and CePO4:Mn NCs and investigated the Ce-Mn energy transfer in these representative rare earth NCs. Upon UV light excitation, both the CeF3:Mn and CePO4:Mn show bright Mn2+ luminescence in the visible region. Their fluorescence output colors, however, are quite different owing to different host crystal structures. The optimum Mn2+ doping concentration has been found at which the Mn2+ luminescence quantum efficiency and Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer efficiency peak at 14% and 60% in the CeF3:Mn NCs, respectively.
Reagents MnCl2 (>99%), TbCl3 (>99%), CeCl3 (>99%), NH4F (>99%), and H3PO4 (>85%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Polyethylenimine [PEI] (branched polymer (-NHCH2CH2-) x (-N(CH2CH2NH2)CH2CH2-) y ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All reagents were used as received without further purification.
Synthesis of CeF3:Mn nanocrystals
CeF3 NCs were synthesized using a modified method reported previously . In a typical procedure, x mL of 0.2 M MnCl2 and (0.2 - x) mL of 0.2 M CeCl3 were added to 15 mL of ethanol with 5 mL of PEI solution (5 wt.%). After stirring for 30 min, an appropriate amount of NH4F was charged. The well-agitated solution was then transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and subsequently heated at 200°C for 2 h. After cooling down, the product was isolated by centrifugation, washed with ethanol and deionized water several times, and dried in vacuum.
Synthesis of CePO4:Mn nanocrystals
In a typical procedure, x mL of 0.2 M MnCl2 and (12 - x) mL of 0.2 M CeCl3 were mixed. The mixture was agitated for 10 min, then charged with 5 mL of 0.5 M H3PO4, and eventually placed under ultrasonic irradiation for 2 h. All ultrasonic irradiations were performed in a water bath with an ultrasonic generator (100 W, 40 kHz; Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The particles were obtained by centrifugation, washed with ethanol and deionized water several times, and dried in vacuum.
Physical and optical measurements
The transmission electron microscopy [TEM] measurements were carried out on a JEOL 2010 HT transmission electron microscope (operated at 200 kV). X-ray diffraction [XRD] analyses were performed on a Bruker D8-advance X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The absorption spectra were obtained with a Varian Cary 5000 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence [PL] and PL excitation [PLE] spectra were recorded by a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer with a Xe lamp as the excitation source.
Results and discussion
Morphology and structure
Similarly, the Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer process in the CePO4:10%Mn NCs triggers an orange luminescence under UV irradiation (Figure 4b). The emission spectra of the CePO4:Mn upon excitation at 260 nm contain both the Ce3+ emission at 355 nm and the Mn2+ orange emission around 575 nm arising from the 4T1g(G)- 6A1g(S) transition of Mn2+. As known, the luminescence output color of the Mn2+ ions is strongly dependent on the coordination environment of the host lattice, such as the strength of the ligand field and the coordination number. The green emission of Mn2+ ions at about 500 nm is usually obtained in a weak crystal field environment where Mn2+ is usually four or eightfold [27, 28]. In contrast, the CePO4 NCs have a monazite structure in which the dopant ions are probably ninefold and in a stronger crystal field environment . Thus, the orange emission can be observed in our synthesized CePO4:Mn NCs. We note that the CePO4:Mn NCs synthesized are rodlike particles whose shape is greatly different from the platelike CeF3:Mn NCs due to the different growth behavior. To eliminate the influence of the particle shape on the luminescence output color of Mn2+ ions, we have further synthesized rodlike hexagonal phase NaYF4:Ce,Mn NCs using our established method  in which the Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer also results in green Mn2+ luminescence at 500 nm (data not shown).
Quantum efficiency and energy transfer efficiency
The Mn2+ luminescence quantum efficiency (η QE) was determined by comparing the Mn2+ emission intensity of the CeF3:Mn aqueous solution with a solution of quinine bisulfate in 0.5 M H2SO4 with approximately the same absorption at an excitation wavelength of 260 nm . It is important that all the sample solutions were sufficiently diluted (absorption value of 0.03 at 260 nm) to minimize the possible effects of reabsorption and other concentration effects . The η QE of the CeF3:Mn NCs increases significantly and reaches 14% as the doped Mn2+ molar concentration increases to 2%. The decreased η QE at Ce3+ concentrations above 2% is probably due to the increased Mn2+↔Mn2+ energy migration which weakens the Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer. We note that the highest η QE we obtained is similar to that of the Ce, Tb co-doped LaF3 NCs reported previously .
By using the method discussed above, we have also investigated the η QE and η ET of the CePO4:Mn2+ NCs in the presence of different Mn2+ concentrations (Figure 5b). Upon doping with the increasing concentrations of Mn2+, both the η QE and η ET increase firstly, and the η QE reaches the peak at 0.6% when the Mn2+ doping concentration is 10%. It is worth noting that both the η QE and η ET in the CeF3:Mn NCs are higher than those in the CePO4:Mn NCs. Compared with phosphates, fluorides normally have lower vibrational energies, which can decrease the quenching of the excited state of rare earth ions  and result in higher quantum efficiency. Besides, the energy transfer efficiency between the sensitizers and acceptors is influenced greatly by the interaction distance of these dopant ions [19, 36]. Here, the less energy transfer efficiency in CePO4:Mn is probably attributed to the larger interaction distance between the Ce3+ and Mn2+ ions. A further increase of the quantum efficiency and energy transfer efficiency is possible by applying an undoped inorganic shell as a protective layer.
The sensitized Mn2+ luminescence has been realized based on the Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer in the prepared Mn2+-doped rare earth NCs. The 4T1g(G)-6A1g(S) characteristic emission of Mn2+ reveals green luminescence in CeF3:Mn and orange luminescence in CePO4:Mn, resulting from the crystal field differences of these two hosts. We worked out that the highest Mn2+ luminescence quantum efficiency can reach 14% and 0.6% in the CeF3:Mn and CePO4 NCs, respectively. Our results may find applications in the manipulations of the Ce3+-Mn2+ energy transfer for redox switches  and broadly impact areas such as photonics, light-emitting diodes, and bioimaging based on manganese materials.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (10904119), the China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation (201003498), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (1082009) and the National Innovation Experiment Program for University Students (091048612).
- Duan XF, Huang Y, Cui Y, Wang JF: Nature. 2001, 66: 409.Google Scholar
- Deng H, Liu CM, Yang SH, Xiao S, Zhou ZK, Wang QQ: Crystal Growth and Design. 2008, 8: 4432. 10.1021/cg800207zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nam JM, Stoeva Si, Mirkin CA: Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004, 126: 5932. 10.1021/ja049384+View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu XF, Chen LD, Li Y, Li M, Xie MY, Zhou L, Wang QQ: Advanced Materials. 2008, 20: 4118. 10.1002/adma.200801224View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keefe MH, Benkstein KD, Hupp JT: Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2000, 205: 201. 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00240-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suyver JF, Wuister SF, Kelly JJ, Meijerink A: Nano Letters. 2001, 1: 429. 10.1021/nl015551hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Norris DJ, Yao N, Charnock FT, Kennedy TA: Nano Letters. 2001, 1: 3. 10.1021/nl005503hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee DH, Wang W, Gutu T, Jeffryes C, Rorrer GL, Jiao J, Chang CH: Journal of Materials Chemistry. 18: 3633. 10.1039/b806812gGoogle Scholar
- Pradhan N, Battaglia DM, Liu Y, Peng X: Nano Letters. 2007, 7: 312. 10.1021/nl062336yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howard WE, Sahni O, Alt PM: Journal of Applied Physics. 1982, 53: 639. 10.1063/1.329971View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen ZQ, Lian C, Zhou D, Xiang Y, Wang M, Ke M, Liang LB, Yu XF: Chemical Physics Letters. 2010, 448: 73. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.02.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang H, Holloway PH: Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003, 107: 9705. 10.1021/jp034749iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Efros AL, Rashba EI, Rosen M: Physical Review Letters. 2001, 87: 206601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.206601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qu F, Hawrylak P: Physical Review Letters. 2005, 95: 217206. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.217206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang XJ, Jia DD, Yen WM: Journal of Luminescence. 2003, 102–103: 34. 10.1016/S0022-2313(02)00541-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Chermont QM, Chanéac C, Seguin J, Pellé P, Maîtrejean S, Jolivet JP, Gourier D, Bessodes M, Scherman D: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007, 104: 9266. 10.1073/pnas.0702427104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang WJ, Luo L, Chen TM, Wang NS: Chemistry of Materials. 2005, 17: 3883. 10.1021/cm050638fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caldiño UG: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2003, 15: 3821.Google Scholar
- Caldiño UG: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2003, 15: 7127.Google Scholar
- Caldiño UG, Muñoz AF, Rubio JO: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 1990, 2: 6071.Google Scholar
- Yu XF, Li M, Xie MY, Chen LD, Li Y, Wang QQ: Nano Research. 2010, 3: 51. 10.1007/s12274-010-1008-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wojtowicz AJ, Balcerzyk M, Berman E, Lempicki A: Physical Review B. 1994, 49: 14880. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14880View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Quan Z, Lin J, Fang J: Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2005, 5: 1532. 10.1166/jnn.2005.319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riwotzki K, Meyssamy H, Kornowski A, Haase M: Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000, 104: 2824. 10.1021/jp993581rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oczkiewicz B, Twardowski A, Demianiuk M: Solid State Communications. 1987, 641: 107. 10.1016/0038-1098(87)90530-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue J, Ye Y, Medina F, Martinez L, Lopez-Rivera SA, Giriat W: Journal of Luminescence. 1998, 78: 173. 10.1016/S0022-2313(98)00003-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández I, Rodríguez F: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2007, 19: 356220.Google Scholar
- Hernández I, Rodríguez F, Hochheimer HD: Physical Review Letters. 2007, 99: 027403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volkov Yu F, Tomilin SV, Lukinykh AN, Lizin AA, Orlova AI, Kitaev DB: Radiochemistry. 2002, 44: 319. 10.1023/A:1020604423113View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melhuish WH: Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1961, 65: 229. 10.1021/j100820a009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dhami S, Demello AJ, Rumbles G, Bishop SM, Phillips D, Beeby A: Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1995, 61: 341. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb08619.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie MY, Yu L, He H, Yu XF: Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2009, 182: 597. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.12.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourcet JC, Fong FK: Journal of Chemical Physics. 1974, 60: 34. 10.1063/1.1680800View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paulose PI, Jose G, Thomas V, Unnikrishnan NV, Warrier MKR: Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2003, 64: 841. 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00416-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang YW, Sun X, Si R, You LP, Yan CH: Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005, 127: 3260. 10.1021/ja042801yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dexter DL: Journal of Chemical Physics. 1953, 21: 836. 10.1063/1.1699044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Yu XF, Yu WY, Zhou J, Peng XN, Wang QQ: Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009, 113: 20271. 10.1021/jp9081307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.