 Nano Idea
 Open Access
 Published:
Boundary layer flow past a stretching/shrinking surface beneath an external uniform shear flow with a convective surface boundary condition in a nanofluid
Nanoscale Research Lettersvolume 6, Article number: 314 (2011)
Abstract
The problem of a steady boundary layer shear flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a nanofluid is studied numerically. The governing partial differential equations are transformed into ordinary differential equations using a similarity transformation, before being solved numerically by a RungeKuttaFehlberg method with shooting technique. Two types of nanofluids, namely, Cuwater and Agwater are used. The effects of nanoparticle volume fraction, the type of nanoparticles, the convective parameter, and the thermal conductivity on the heat transfer characteristics are discussed. It is found that the heat transfer rate at the surface increases with increasing nanoparticle volume fraction while it decreases with the convective parameter. Moreover, the heat transfer rate at the surface of Cuwater nanofluid is higher than that at the surface of Agwater nanofluid even though the thermal conductivity of Ag is higher than that of Cu.
Introduction
Blasius [1] was the first who studied the steady boundary layer flow over a fixed flat plate with uniform free stream. Howarth [2] solved the Blasius problem numerically. Since then, many researchers have investigated the similar problem with various physical aspects [3–6]. In contrast to the Blasius problem, Sakiadis [7] introduced the boundary layer flow induced by a moving plate in a quiescent ambient fluid. Tsou et al. [8] studied the flow and temperature fields in the boundary layer on a continuous moving surface, both analytically and experimentally and verified the results obtained in [7]. Crane [9] extended this concept to a stretching plate in a quiescent fluid with a stretching velocity that varies with the distance from a fixed point and presented an exact analytic solution. Different from the above studies, Miklavčič and Wang [10] examined the flow due to a shrinking sheet where the velocity moves toward a fixed point. Fang [11] studied the boundary layer flow over a shrinking sheet with a powerlaw velocity, and obtained exact solutions for some values of the parameters.
It is well known that Choi [12] was the first to introduce the term "nanofluid" that represents the fluid in which nanoscale particles are suspended in the base fluid with low thermal conductivity such as water, ethylene glycol, oils, etc. [13]. In recent years, the concept of nanofluid has been proposed as a route for surpassing the performance of heat transfer rate in liquids currently available. The materials with sizes of nanometers possess unique physical and chemical properties [14]. They can flow smoothly through microchannels without clogging them because they are small enough to behave similar to liquid molecules [15]. This fact has attracted many researchers such as [16–27] to investigate the heat transfer characteristics in nanofluids, and they found that in the presence of the nanoparticles in the fluids, the effective thermal conductivity of the fluid increases appreciably and consequently enhances the heat transfer characteristics. An excellent collection of articles on this topic can be found in [28–33], and in the book by Das et al. [14].
It is worth mentioning that while modeling the boundary layer flow and heat transfer of stretching/shrinking surfaces, the boundary conditions that are usually applied are either a specified surface temperature or a specified surface heat flux. However, there are boundary layer flow and heat transfer problems in which the surface heat transfer depends on the surface temperature. Perhaps the simplest case of this is when there is a linear relation between the surface heat transfer and surface temperature. This situation arises in conjugate heat transfer problems (see, for example, [34]), and when there is Newtonian heating of the convective fluid from the surface; the latter case was discussed in detail by Merkin [35]. The situation with Newtonian heating arises in what is usually termed as conjugate convective flow, where the heat is supplied to the convective fluid through a bounding surface with a finite heat capacity. This results in the heat transfer rate through the surface being proportional to the local difference in the temperature with the ambient conditions. This configuration of Newtonian heating occurs in many important engineering devices, for example, in heat exchangers, where the conduction in a solid tube wall is greatly influenced by the convection in the fluid flowing over it. On the other hand, most recently, heat transfer problems for boundary layer flow concerning with a convective boundary condition were investigated by Aziz [36], Makinde and Aziz [37], Ishak [38], and Magyari [39] for the Blasius flow. Similar analysis was applied to the Blasius and Sakiadis flows with radiation effects by Bataller [4]. Yao et al. [40] have very recently investigated the heat transfer of a viscous fluid flow over a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with a convective boundary condition. Magyari and Weidman [41] investigated the heat transfer characteristics on a semiinfinite flat plate due to a uniform shear flow, both for the prescribed surface temperature and prescribed surface heat flux. It is worth pointing out that a uniform shear flow is driven by a viscous outer flow of rotational velocity whereas the classical Blasius flow is driven over the plate by an inviscid outer flow of irrotational velocity.
The objective of this study is to extend the study of Magyari and Weidman [41] to a stretching/shrinking surface with a convective boundary condition immersed in a nanofluid, that is, to study the steady boundary layer shear flow over a stretching/shrinking surface beneath an external uniform shear flow with a convective surface boundary condition in a nanofluid. This problem is relevant to several practical applications in the field of metallurgy, chemical engineering, etc. A number of technical processes concerning polymers involve the cooling of continuous strips or filaments by drawing them through a quiescent fluid. In these cases, the properties of the final product depend to a great extent on the rate of cooling, which is governed by the structure of the boundary layer near the stretching/shrinking surface. The governing partial differential equations are transformed into ordinary differential equations using a similarity transformation, before being solved numerically by the RungeKuttaFehlberg method with shooting technique.
Mathematical formulation
Consider a twodimensional steady boundary layer shear flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a laminar and incompressible nanofluid of ambient temperature T _{ ∞ } . The fluid is a waterbased nanofluid containing two type of nanoparticles, either Cu (copper) or Ag (silver). The nanoparticles are assumed to have a uniform shape and size. Moreover, it is assumed that both the fluid phase and nanoparticles are in thermal equilibrium state. Figure 1 describes the physical model and the coordinate system, where the x and y axes are measured along the surface of the sheet and normal to it, respectively. Following Magyari and Weidman [41], it is assumed that the velocity of the moving stretching/shrinking sheet is u _{w}(x) = U _{w}(x/L)^{1/3} and the velocity outside the boundary layer (potential flow) is u _{e}(y) = βy, where β is the constant strain rate. We also assume that the bottom surface of the stretching/shrinking surface is heated by convection from a base (water) fluid at temperature T _{f}, which provides a heat transfer coefficient h _{f} (see [36]). Under the boundary layer approximations, the basic equations are (see [17, 42]),
Further, we assume that the sheet surface temperature is maintained by convective heat transfer at a constant temperature T _{w} (see [36]). Thus, the boundary conditions of Equations 13 are
where L is the characteristic length of the stretching/shrinking surface. The properties of nanofluids are defined as follows (see [20]):
Following Magyari and Weidman [41] and Aziz [36], we look for a similarity solution of Equations 13 of the form:
where ν_{f} is the kinematic viscosity of the base (water) fluid, and ψ is the stream function, which is defined as u = ∂ψ/∂y and v = –∂ψ/∂x, which automatically satisfies Equation 1. A simple analysis shows that L = (ν_{f}/β)^{1/2}. Substituting (6) into Equations 2 and 3, we obtain the following ordinary differential equations:
subject to the boundary conditions
where primes denote differentiation with respect to η, and λ = U _{w}/(βν_{f})^{1/2} is the stretching/shrinking parameter, and γ is given by
For the thermal equation (8) to have a similarity solution, the quantity γ must be a constant and not a function of x as in Equation 10. This condition can be met if h _{f} is proportional to (x/L)^{1/3}. We, therefore, assume
where c is a constant. Thus, we have
with γ defined by Equation 12, the solutions of Equations 79 yield the similarity solutions. However, with γ defined by Equation 10, the generated solutions are local similarity solutions. We notice that the solution of Equations 7 and 8 approaches the solution for the constant surface temperature as γ → ∞. This can be seen from the boundary conditions (9), which gives θ(0) = 1 as γ → ∞. Further, it is worth mentioning that Equations 7 and 8 reduce to those of Magyari and Weidman [41] when φ = 0 (regular fluid) and λ = 0 (fixed surface).
The quantities of interest are the skin friction coefficient C _{f} and the local Nusselt number Nu _{ x } , which represents the heat transfer rate at the surface, and they can be shown to be given in dimensionless form as
Results and discussion
The nonlinear ordinary differential equations (7) and (8) subject to the boundary conditions (9) were solved numerically by the RungeKuttaFehlberg method with shooting technique. We consider two different types of nanoparticles, namely, Cu and Ag with water as the base fluid. Table 1 shows the thermophysical properties of water and the elements Cu and Ag. The Prandtl number of the base fluid (water) is kept constant at 6.2. It is worth mentioning that this study reduces to those of a viscous or regular fluid when φ = 0. Figure 2 shows the variation of the skin friction coefficient (1/(1φ)^{2.5})f"(0) with λ of Agwater nanofluid when γ = 0.5 for different nanoparticle volume fraction φ, while the respective local Nusselt number (k _{nf}/k _{f}) θ' (0) is displayed in Figure 3. It can be seen that for a particular value of λ, the skin friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number increase with increasing φ. Dual solutions are found to exist when λ < 0 (shrinking case) as displayed in Figures 2 and 3. Moreover, the solution can be obtained up to a critical value of λ (say λ_{c}), and λ_{c} decreases with increasing φ. The similar pattern is observed for Cuwater nanofluid, which is not presented here, for the sake of brevity. It is observed that, the solution is unique for λ ≥ 0, dual solutions exist for λ_{c} < λ < 0, and no solution for λ < λ _{c}. The values of λ_{c} for Agwater nanofluid and Cuwater nanofluid for different values of φ are presented in Table 2. It is seen that for φ = 0.1 and φ = 0.2, the value of λ_{c} for Cuwater nanofluid is greater than those of Agwater nanofluid. The temperature profiles of Agwater and Cuwater nanofluids for different values of φ when γ = 0.5 and λ = 0.53 are presented in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. These profiles show that, there exist two different profiles satisfying the far field boundary condition (9) asymptotically, thus supporting the dual nature of the solutions presented in Figures 2 and 3. Both Figures 4 and 5 show that the boundary layer thickness is higher for the second solution compared to the first solution, which in turn produces higher surface temperature θ(0) for the former.
Figure 6 displays the variation of the skin friction coefficient (1/(1φ)^{2.5})f"(0) with λ when γ = 0.5 for water, Cuwater and Agwater nanofluids, while the respective local Nusselt number (k _{nf}/k _{f})θ'(0) is shown in Figure 7. In general, for a particular value of λ, the skin friction coefficient of Cuwater nanofluid is higher than that of Agwater nanofluid and that of water for the upper branch solutions, while the skin friction coefficient of Agwater nanofluid is higher than that of Cuwater nanofluid and that of water for the lower branch solutions. Further, Figure 7 shows that Cuwater nanofluid has the highest local Nusselt number compared with Agwater nanofluid and water for the upper branch solutions. From this observation, the heat transfer rate at the surface of Cuwater nanofluid is higher than that of Agwater nanofluid even though Ag has higher thermal conductivity than the thermal conductivity of Cu as presented in Table 1. However, the difference in heat transfer rate at the surface is small. On the other hand, Agwater nanofluid has the highest local Nusselt number compared with Cuwater nanofluid and water for the lower branch solutions. The corresponding temperature profiles that support the results obtained in Figure 7 when λ = 0.53 is shown in Figure 8.
It is observed from Figures 2, 3, 6, and 7 that the skin friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number are more influenced by the nanoparticle volume fraction than the types of nanoparticles. This observation is in agreement with those obtained by Oztop and AbuNada [20] and AbuNada and Oztop [43]. In addition, water has the lowest skin friction coefficient and local Nusselt number compared with Cuwater and Agwater nanofluids. The range of λ for which the solution exists is wider for water compared with the others.
The temperature profiles of Agwater nanofluid for different values of convective parameter γ when φ = 0.2 is presented in Figure 9. It is observed that the surface temperature increases with an increase in γ for both solution branches, and in consequence, decreases the local Nusselt number. It can be seen that from the convective boundary conditions (9), the value of θ(0) approaches 1, as γ → ∞. Further, the convective parameter γ as well as the Prandtl number Pr has no influence on the flow field, which is clear from Equations 79. Finally, it is worth mentioning that all the velocity and temperature profiles presented in Figures 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 satisfy the farfield boundary conditions (9) asymptotically, thus supporting the validity of the numerical results obtained.
Conclusions
The problem of a steady boundary layer shear flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet in a nanofluid was studied numerically. The governing partial differential equations were transformed into ordinary differential equations by a similarity transformation, before being solved numerically using the RungeKuttaFehlberg method with shooting technique. We considered two types of nanofluids, namely, Cuwater and Agwater. It was found that the heat transfer rate at the surface increases with increasing nanoparticle volume fraction while it decreases with the convective parameter. The variations of the skin friction coefficient and the heat transfer rate at the surface are more influenced by the nanoparticle volume fraction than the types of the nanofluids. Moreover, the heat transfer rate at the surface of Cuwater nanofluid is higher than that of the Agwater nanofluid even though Ag has higher thermal conductivity than that of Cu.
Abbreviations
 c :

Constant
 C _{f} :

Skin friction coefficient
 C _{p} :

Specific heat at constant pressure
 f :

Dimensionless stream function
 h _{f} :

Heat transfer coefficient
 k :

Thermal conductivity
 L :

Reference length
 Nu _{ x } :

Local Nusselt number
 Pr:

Prandtl number
 q _{w} :

Surface heat flux
 T :

Fluid temperature
 T _{f} :

Temperature of the hot fluid
 T _{w} :

Surface temperature
 T _{ ∞ } :

Ambient temperature
 u :

v Velocity components along the x :and ydirections, respectively
 u _{ e }(y):

Free stream velocity
 u _{w}(x):

Stretching/shrinking velocity
 U _{w} :

Reference stretching/shrinking velocity
 x :

y: Cartesian coordinates along the surface and normal to it, respectively
 α:

Thermal diffusivity
 β:

Constant strain rate
 γ:

Convective parameter
 η:

Similarity variable
 θ:

Dimensionless temperature
 λ:

Stretching/shrinking parameter
 μ:

Dynamic viscosity
 ν:

Kinematic viscosity
 ρ:

Fluid density
 φ:

Nanoparticle volume fraction
 ψ:

Stream function
 τ_{ w } :

Wall shear stress
 f:

Fluid
 nf:

Nanofluid
 s:

Solid.
References
 1.
Blasius H: Grenzschichten in Flussigkeiten mit Kleiner Reibung. Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik 1908, 56: 1–37.
 2.
Howarth L: On the solution of the laminar boundary layer equations. Proc R Soc Lond A 1938, 164: 547–579. 10.1098/rspa.1938.0037
 3.
Merkin JH: The effect of buoyancy forces on the boundarylayer flow over a semiinfinite vertical flat plate in a uniform free stream. J Fluid Mech 1969, 35: 439–450. 10.1017/S0022112069001212
 4.
Bataller RC: Radiation effects for the Blasius and Sakiadis flows with a convective surface boundary condition. Appl Math Comput 2008, 206: 832–840. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.10.001
 5.
Pantokratoras A: Asymptotic suction profiles for the Blasius and Sakiadis flow with constant and variable fluid properties. Arch Appl Mech 2009, 79: 469–478. 10.1007/s0041900802434
 6.
Fang T, Liang W, Lee CF: A new solution branch for the Blasius equation  a shrinking sheet problem. Comput Math Appl 2008, 56: 3088–3095. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.07.027
 7.
Sakiadis BC: Boundarylayer behaviour on continuous solid surfaces. I. Boundarylayer equations for twodimensional and axisymmetric flow. AIChE J 1961, 7: 26–28. 10.1002/aic.690070108
 8.
Tsou FK, Sparrow EM, Goldstein RJ: Flow and heat transfer in the boundary layer on a continuous moving surface. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1967, 10: 219–235. 10.1016/00179310(67)901007
 9.
Crane LJ: Flow past a stretching plate. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik 1970, 21: 645–647. 10.1007/BF01587695
 10.
Miklavčič M, Wang CY: Viscous flow due to a shrinking sheet. Q Appl Math 2006, 64: 283–290.
 11.
Fang T: Boundary layer flow over a shrinking sheet with powerlaw velocity. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2008, 51: 5838–5843. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.067
 12.
Choi SUS: Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. The Proceedings of the 1995 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Francisco, USA. ASME, FED 231/MD 66 1995, 99–105.
 13.
Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS: Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci 2007, 46: 1–19. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.06.010
 14.
Das SK, Choi SUS, Yu W, Pradeep T: Nanofluids: Science and Technology. NJ: Wiley; 2007.
 15.
Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M: Buoyancydriven heat transfer enhancement in a twodimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2003, 46: 3639–3653. 10.1016/S00179310(03)00156X
 16.
AbuNada E: Application of nanofluids for heat transfer enhancement of separated flows encountered in a backward facing step. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2008, 29: 242–249. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.07.001
 17.
Tiwari RJ, Das MK: Heat transfer augmentation in a twosided liddriven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2007, 50: 2002–2018. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.09.034
 18.
Maïga SEB, Palm SJ, Nguyen CT, Roy G, Galanis N: Heat transfer enhancement by using nanofluids in forced convection flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2005, 26: 530–546.
 19.
Polidori G, Fohanno S, Nguyen CT: A note on heat transfer modelling of newtonian nanofluids in laminar free convection. Int J Therm Sci 2007, 46: 739–744. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.11.009
 20.
Oztop HF, AbuNada E: Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2008, 29: 1326–1336. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.04.009
 21.
Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV: The ChengMinkowycz problem for natural convective boundarylayer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2009, 52: 5792–5795. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.024
 22.
Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA: Natural convective boundarylayer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate. Int J Therm Sci 2010, 49: 243–247. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.015
 23.
Muthtamilselvan M, Kandaswamy P, Lee J: Heat transfer enhancement of cooperwater nanofluids in a liddriven enclosure. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2010, 15: 1501–1510. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.06.015
 24.
Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I: Boundarylayer flow of nanofluids over a moving surface in a flowing fluid. Int J Therm Sci 2010, 49: 1663–1668. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.01.026
 25.
Bachok N, Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I: Flow and heat transfer at a general threedimensional stagnation point in a nanofluid. Physica B 2010, 405: 4914–4918. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.09.031
 26.
Yacob NA, Ishak A, Pop I: FalknerSkan problem for a static or moving wedge in nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 2011, 50: 133–139. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.10.008
 27.
Yacob NA, Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I: FalknerSkan problem for a static and moving wedge with prescribed surface heat flux in a nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 2011, 38: 149–153. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.12.003
 28.
Buongiorno J: Convective transport in nanofluids. ASME J Heat Transfer 2006, 128: 240–250. 10.1115/1.2150834
 29.
Daungthongsuk W, Wongwises S: A critical review of convective heat transfer nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11: 797–817. 10.1016/j.rser.2005.06.005
 30.
Trisaksri V, Wongwises S: Critical review of heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11: 512–523. 10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.010
 31.
Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS: A review on nanofluids  Part I: theoretical and numerical investigations. Braz J Chem Eng 2008, 25: 613–630.
 32.
Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS: A review on nanofluids  Part II: experiments and applications. Braz J Chem Eng 2008, 25: 631–648. 10.1590/S010466322008000400002
 33.
Kakaç S, Pramuanjaroenkij A: Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2009, 52: 3187–3196.
 34.
Merkin JH, Pop I: Conjugate free convection on a vertical surface. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1996, 39: 1527–1534. 10.1016/00179310(95)002383
 35.
Merkin JH: Naturalconvection boundarylayer flow on a vertical surface with Newtonian heating. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 1994, 15: 392–398. 10.1016/0142727X(94)900531
 36.
Aziz A: A similarity solution for laminar thermal boundary layer over a flat plate with a convective surface boundary condition. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2009, 14: 1064–1068. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.05.003
 37.
Makinde OD, Aziz A: MHD mixed convection from a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium with a convective boundary condition. Int J Therm Sci 2010, 49: 1813–1820. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.05.015
 38.
Ishak A: Similarity solutions for flow and heat transfer over a permeable surface with convective boundary condition. Appl Math Comput 2010, 217: 837–842. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.06.026
 39.
Magyari E: Comment on 'A similarity solution for laminar thermal boundary layer over a flat plate with a convective surface boundary condition' by A. Aziz. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2009, 14:1064–1068. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2011, 16: 599–601. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.03.020
 40.
Yao S, Fang T, Zhong Y: Heat transfer of a generalized stretching/shrinking wall problem with convective boundary conditions. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2011, 16: 752–760. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.028
 41.
Magyari E, Weidman PD: Heat transfer on a plate beneath an external uniform shear flow. Int J Therm Sci 2006, 45: 110–115. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.05.006
 42.
Schlichting H, Gersten K: BoundaryLayer Theory. New York: Springer; 2000.
 43.
AbuNada E, Oztop HF: Effects of inclination angle on natural convection in enclosures filled with Cuwater nanofluid. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2009, 30: 669–678. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.02.001
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions for the improvement of the article. This study was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia (Project Code: 060102SF0610) and the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Project Code: UKMGGPMNBT0802010).
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
NAY and AI performed the numerical analysis and wrote the manuscript. IP carried out the literature review and cowrote the manuscript. KV helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Heat Transfer Rate
 Boundary Layer Flow
 Heat Transfer Characteristic
 Local Nusselt Number
 Convective Parameter