- Nano Express
- Open Access
Facile fabrication of super-hydrophobic nano-needle arrays via breath figures method
© Kim et al; licensee Springer. 2011
- Received: 29 July 2011
- Accepted: 6 December 2011
- Published: 6 December 2011
Super-hydrophobic surfaces which have been fabricated by various methods such as photolithography, chemical treatment, self-assembly, and imprinting have gained enormous attention in recent years. Especially 2D arrays of nano-needles have been shown to have super-hydrophobicity due to their sharp surface roughness. These arrays can be easily generated by removing the top portion of the honeycomb films prepared by the breath figures method. The hydrophilic block of an amphiphilic polymer helps in the fabrication of the nano-needle arrays through the production of well-ordered honeycomb films and good adhesion of the film to a substrate. Anisotropic patterns with water wettability difference can be useful for patterning cells and other materials using their selective growth on the hydrophilic part of the pattern. However, there has not been a simple way to generate patterns with highly different wettability. Mechanical stamping of the nano-needle array with a polyurethane stamp might be the simplest way to fabricate patterns with wettability difference. In this study, super-hydrophobic nano-needle arrays were simply fabricated by removing the top portion of the honeycomb films. The maximum water contact angle obtained with the nano-needle array was 150°. By controlling the pore size and the density of the honeycomb films, the height, width, and density of nano-needle arrays were determined. Anisotropic patterns with different wettability were fabricated by simply pressing the nano-needle array at ambient temperature with polyurethane stamps which were flexible but tough. Mechanical stamping of nano-needle arrays with micron patterns produced hierarchical super-hydrophobic structures.
PACS: 05.70.Np, 68.55.am, 68.55.jm
- anisotropic pattern
Super-hydrophobic surfaces have been designed to study scientific fundamentals of water repellency and to use them for practical applications such as self-cleaning materials [1, 2], micro-fluidics , nano-imprinting stamps , and biotechnology . It has been well known that super-hydrophobic surfaces can be fabricated by controlling roughness on hydrophobic materials [6, 7]; thus, both top-down [8–12] and bottom-up [13–16] methods have been applied to make the surfaces of hydrophobic materials rough in micro- and nanoscales to enhance their hydrophobicity.
A 2D array of hexagonally packed nano-needles has been introduced to present super-hydrophobicity. Chen et al. have fabricated a 2D array of ZnO needles using polystyrene [PS] microspheres as a template and electroplating ZnO on the PS template . The fabricated array showed super-hydrophobicity. Yabu et al.  also reported a nano-needle array fabricated by peeling off the top portion of the honeycomb films which were prepared by a designed fluorinated polymer using the breath figures method. For the breath figures method, a highly organized, hexagonal thin film, called a honeycomb film, is induced by the evaporation of organic solvent after water droplets sink into the polymer solution. Then, the top surface of the prepared honeycomb film can be simply taped off and the nano-needle array is formed on the film.
Honeycomb-structured thin films have been usually fabricated by the breath figures method with a polymer like PS . Surfactants or terminal-modified PS have been used to obtain more regular honeycomb structures because they can act to stabilize water droplets condensed in the polymer solution in which the polymer is dissolved in an organic solvent during the breath figures method [18–20]. On the other hand, one problem to consider when generating the nano-needle array is that PS is not adhesive to conventional substrates such as glass and Si. Good substrate adhesion is important when the top portion of the honeycomb film is removed because good adhesion can ensure that the entire honeycomb film is not detached from the substrate. Thus, amphiphilic block copolymers which have hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers together are advantageous for making well-ordered honeycomb films and also the nano-needle array because there is no need to add another surfactant for stabilizing the water droplets in the polymer solution; in addition, the substrate adhesion problem can be solved with the hydrophilic block. The hydrophilic block can stabilize water droplets in the polymer solution and also attach firmly to inorganic substrates such as glass or Si as well as flexible substrates such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) [PET] or poly(ethylene naphthalate). In this study, polystyrene-block-poly (2-vinyl pyridine) [PS-b-P2VP] has been used to fabricate honeycomb film and nano-needle arrays. PS (surface tension, ~33 mN/m) consists of a hydrophobic block, while P2VP (surface tension, ~60 mN/m) plays a role as a hydrophilic block.
Anisotropic patterns which have wettability difference with hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity together have been widely applied to selective cell growth , water collection , micro-fluidic channels , and templates for patterning [22, 23]. To fabricate patterns with wettability difference, several methods have been used, such as photolithography [5, 22, 23] and chemical treatment [3, 21]. Hot embossing has also been used to make a hierarchical pattern with a honeycomb structure . However, these are not simple and require fancy instruments or harsh chemicals with a high temperature. In this study, we made the anisotropic pattern with wettability difference formed by simply pressing the nano-needle array with flexible polyurethane [PU] stamps at ambient temperature.
The diblock copolymer PS-b-P2VP (27,000-b-4,000 g/mol, φ P2VP = 13.4%) was purchased from Polymer Source Inc. (Dorval, QC, Canada). Carbon disulfide (CS2) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). PS-b-P2VP was dissolved at 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 wt.% in the PS-selective solvent (CS2).
Preparation of honeycomb films using the breath figures method
The block copolymer solutions were drop-cast onto several substrates such as PET, glass, or Si inside an acrylic glass chamber at room temperature. Construction of the chamber provided a relatively closed system through which humidity could be kept constant during the course of the experiment. Humidity fluctuations were kept within 90-95%. Humid air was pumped into the chamber until an appropriate relative humidity was reached. Airflow was reduced to eliminate macroscopic convection currents and other unpredictable thermodynamic consequences, but kept high enough to maintain the desired humidity. This allowed homogeneous honeycomb patterning with a relatively large coverage. After 5 min, the solvent evaporated and the slides were removed from the chamber to allow water evaporation under ambient conditions. The films obtained were circular, with diameters of around 3 cm.
Preparation of nano-needle array by a simple taping-off method
Adhesive Scotch tape was placed on the surface of the honeycomb films in order to remove the top portion of the polymer thin film. The surface of the tape was rubbed smoothly with the thumb to ensure full contact with the top layer of the honeycomb film without trapped air. Then, the tape was peeled off slowly. The prepared nano-needle arrays were brought into analysis and stamping.
Fabrication of patterns with different wettability by PU stamps
First, a patterned Si master on which PU stamps would be replicated was fabricated by conventional photolithography with a photo-mask. PU stamps were fabricated by replication of the pre-patterned master with a UV-curable urethane acrylate prepolymer. Urethane acrylate (EBECRYL resin, Cytec Industries, Woodland Park, NJ, USA) dissolved into propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) and 5wt.% photo-initiator (Irgacure 184, CIBA, Tarrytown, NY, USA) was added to the solution. The solution was then dropped on a substrate, which afterwards was covered with the patterned Si master. The sample was then UV-cured at 1 J/cm2 with 350-nm wavelength UV lamp. Then, PU stamps with pre-designed negative patterns were placed on the prepared nano-needle array and were pressed with slight pressure < 1 N/m2 by hand for 5 min at ambient temperature.
Atomic force microscopic images and the height profiles of the honeycomb films and the corresponding nano-needle array were obtained by PARK systems XE-100 AFM. Optical microscopy was performed using a Nikon Eclipse LV100 with a 50-W halogen light source, and images were obtained via Nikon's digital sight camera system. Scanning electron microscope [SEM] images were obtained via an FEI DualBeam Strata 235 in 5.00 kV. Samples were coated with gold prior to SEM imaging.
Contact angles of water (surface energy, 72.75 mN/m at 20°C) on the surfaces were measured by the sessile drop technique. Of the water, 50 μl was dropped on each surface and each contact angle measured by a contact angle goniometer.
Fabrication of honeycomb films and nano-needle arrays
As mentioned in the "Background," PS has been used to fabricate honeycomb films with the use of surfactants which have been added to provide water droplets with stability during the breath figures method. PS was not firmly attached to conventional substrates such as glass and Si because it is hydrophobic. Thus, nano-needles were hardly formed without all the film detached from the substrate when PS honeycomb films prepared on glass substrates were peeled off by a Scotch tape in our trials. In this respect, the use of an amphiphilic block copolymer was very helpful in fabricating honeycomb films and nano-needle arrays using the simple taping-off method. A hydrophilic block, P2VP, played both roles as a surfactant for the stability of water droplets and a substance for firm attachment to the substrate.
Characteristics of nano-needle arrays according to honeycomb pore density
Super-hydrophobicity presented on nano-needle arrays
Nano-needle arrays prepared from the honeycomb film with a pore size of 3.5 μm showed an average contact angle of 150°, which means super-hydrophobicity (Figure 4b). When prepared with a smaller pore size (500 nm), the array of nano-needles showed a lower average contact angle of about 145°. Topographical characteristics such as width and radius of curvature of nano-needles appear to be properties which determine the hydrophobicity of rough surfaces , although these should be further analyzed. According to Draper et al. , the parameters related to the hydrophobicity of rough surfaces are deduced from the following equations:
The above equations give us the parameters for a contact angle (D*) and the robustness of a meta-stable Cassie state (H*). As parameter D* increases, a fraction of solid/liquid, that is, the surface/water contact, decreases and thus the contact angle increases. As parameter H* increases, the robustness of the state increases and the contact angle remains high. For the nano-needle array with 3.5-μm diameter, R is 10 nm, D is 3.5 μm, θ is 90° for flat PS film, and l cap is 2.72 mm. D* and H* were calculated to be 351 and 2.11, respectively.
For the nano-needle array with 500-nm diameter, D* and H* were 51 and 14.8, respectively. This might explain why the nano-needle array with a smaller pore diameter has a smaller contact angle (145° for 500 nm compared with 150° for 3.5 μm) - the difference in D* is large but that in the contact angle is not because D* does not contain anything related to material property but to structural property, and thus, it can only provide a relative measure of the contact angles - from the fact that the nano-needle array with 1-μm pore diameter has D* smaller than that with 3.5-μm pore diameter. Therefore, the width and radius of curvature of nano-needles might be customized to obtain better super-hydrophobicity. Therefore, this simple method, which includes drop casting and the breath figures method of the amphiphilic block copolymer solution and taping-off of the resulting honeycomb film, would be advantageous for the fabrication of super-hydrophobic surfaces with respect to cost and ease of fabrication.
Patterns with different wettability fabricated by simple pressing with PU stamps
Anisotropic patterns with water wettability difference were formed simply by pressing nano-needle array with a PU stamp. It has been revealed by flattening the nano-needle array that the flattened array showed a small value of contact angle compared with the nano-needle array. The pattern of the PU stamp which had lines or alphabet letters has been successfully stamped onto the nano-needle array. One of the stamped patterns is shown in Figure 4b. As shown on the right of Figure 4a, the pressed area (the right side) is smooth and flat, in contrast to the unpressed area (the left side). Thus, the unpressed area in which nano-needles remain unaffected would be super-hydrophobic, while the pressed area in which nano-needles are made flat would show a much decreased hydrophobicity or a little of hydrophilicity due to the hydrophilic P2VP block. This anisotropic pattern with different wettability will be further applied as a template for electrical materials such as metals and semiconductors which are selectively deposited on the hydrophilic area.
A 2D array of nano-needles has been fabricated by simply taping off the top portion of honeycomb films prepared by drop casting on various substrates like glass or PET and subsequently by applying the breath figures method. The use of an amphiphilic block copolymer, PS-b-P2VP, enabled fabricating well-ordered honeycomb structures stabilizing water droplets formed in the polymer solution during the breath figures method and easy peeling off of the top portion of the honeycomb film resulting from a strong adhesion of the polymer thin film to the substrates.
The 2D array of nano-needles had about 10-nm radius of curvature and showed super-hydrophobicity as the average water contact angle on the nano-needle array was measured to be 150°. The pore size and the density of the honeycomb film could be controlled by polymer concentration and polymer micelle formation. In this respect, the height, width, and density of nano-needles on the nano-needle array would be controlled as well. The characteristics of nano-needles were expected to affect hydrophobicity due to the fact that nano-needle arrays prepared from honeycomb films with different pore sizes and densities showed different water contact angles.
Anisotropic patterns with different water wettability were fabricated by simply pressing the nano-needle array with flexible PU stamps by hand at ambient temperature. The anisotropic pattern will be further used as a template to pattern electrical materials such as metals or semiconductors.
This work received financial support from Simon Fraser University and from the Discovery Grant Program, funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
- Blossey R: Self-cleaning surfaces - virtual realities. Nat Mater 2003, 2: 301–306. 10.1038/nmat856View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Wong CA, Hayden CA: Effects of micro- and nano-structures on the self-cleaning behaviour of lotus leaves. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 1359–1362. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/5/032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mumm F, van Helvoort ATJ, Sikorski P: Easy route to superhydrophobic copper-based wire-guided droplet microfluidic systems. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 2647–2652. 10.1021/nn900607pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim WS, Jin JH, Bae BS: Low adhesive force of fluorinated sol-gel hybrid materials for easy de-moulding in a UV-based nano-imprint process. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 1212–1216. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/5/008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishizaki T, Saito N, Takai O: Correlation of cell adhesive behaviors on superhydrophobic, superhydrophilic, and micropatterned superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic surfaces to their surface chemistry. Langmuir 2010, 26: 8147–8154. 10.1021/la904447cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reinhoudt D, Li XM, Crego-Calama M: What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem Soc Rev 2007, 36: 1350–1368. 10.1039/b602486fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang C, Tartaglino U, Persson BNJ: Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 116103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shiu JY, Kuo CW, Chen PL, Mou CY: Fabrication of tunable superhydrophobic surfaces by nanosphere lithography. Chem Mater 2004, 16: 561–564. 10.1021/cm034696hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao D, Cao LL, Hu HH: Design and fabrication of micro-textures for inducing a superhydrophobic behavior on hydrophilic materials. Langmuir 2007, 23: 4310–4314. 10.1021/la063572rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang SM, Park SG, Lee SY, Jang SG: Perfectly hydrophobic surfaces with patterned nanoneedles of controllable features. Langmuir 2010, 26: 5295–5299. 10.1021/la100409cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang SM, Park SG, Moon HH, Lee SK, Shim J: Bioinspired holographically featured superhydrophobic and supersticky nanostructured materials. Langmuir 2010, 26: 1468–1472. 10.1021/la9035826View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao H, Law KY, Sambhy V: Fabrication, surface properties, and origin of superoleophobicity for a model textured surface. Langmuir 2011, 27: 5927–5935. 10.1021/la104872qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ajayaghosh A, Srinivasan S, Praveen VK, Philip R: Bioinspired superhydrophobic coatings of carbon nanotubes and linear pi systems based on the "bottom-up" self-assembly approach. Angew Chem Int Edit 2008, 47: 5750–5754.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yabu H, Takebayashi M, Tanaka M, Shimomura M: Superhydrophobic and lipophobic properties of self-organized honeycomb and pincushion structures. Langmuir 2005, 21: 3235–3237. 10.1021/la050013wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng L, Song YL, Zhai J, Liu BQ, Xu J, Jiang L, Zhu DB: Creation of a superhydrophobic surface from an amphiphilic polymer. Angew Chem Int Edit 2003, 42: 800–802. 10.1002/anie.200390212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Genzer J, Efimenko K: Creating long-lived superhydrophobic polymer surfaces through mechanically assembled monolayers. Science 2000, 290: 2130–2133. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen L-Y, Lai C-H, Wu P-W, Fan S-K: Electrowetting of superhydrophobic ZnO inverse opals. J Electrochem Soc 2011, 158: P93-P99. 10.1149/1.3594723View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bunz UHF: Breath figures as a dynamic templating method for polymers and nanomaterials. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 973–989. 10.1002/adma.200501131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu ZK, Wan LS, Ke BB, Li XK, Meng XL, Zhang LY: Honeycomb-patterned films of polystyrene/poly(ethylene glycol): preparation, surface aggregation and protein adsorption. Sci China Ser B 2009, 52: 969–974. 10.1007/s11426-009-0007-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yunus S, Delcorte A, Poleunis C, Bertrand P, Bolognesi A, Botta C: A route to self-organized honeycomb microstructured polystyrene films and their chemical characterization by ToF-SIMS imaging. Adv Funct Mater 2007, 17: 1079–1084. 10.1002/adfm.200600470View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhai L, Berg MC, Cebeci FC, Kim Y, Milwid JM, Rubner MF, Cohen RE: Patterned superhydrophobic surfaces: toward a synthetic mimic of the Namib Desert beetle. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 1213–1217. 10.1021/nl060644qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai YK, Huang JY, Gong JJ, Huang YX, Wang CL, Chen Z, Lin CJ: Superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic template: a simple approach to micro- and nanostructure patterning of TiO 2 films. J Electrochem Soc 2009, 156: D480-D484. 10.1149/1.3216032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin CJ, Lai YK, Lin ZQ, Huang JY, Sun L, Chen Z: Controllable construction of ZnO/TiO 2 patterning nanostructures by superhydrophilic/superhydrophobic templates. New J Chem 2010, 34: 44–51. 10.1039/b9nj00325hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu CH, Ge WJ: Hierarchical honeycomb patterns with tunable microstructures: controllable fabrication and application as replication templates. Soft Matter 2011, 7: 2790–2796. 10.1039/c0sm01159bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma V, Song LL, Jones RL, Barrow MS, Williams R, Srinivasarao M: Effect of solvent choice on breath-figure-templated assembly of "holey" polymer films. Epl-Europhys Lett 2010, 91: 38001–38017. 10.1209/0295-5075/91/38001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Good RJ, Kotsidas ED: The contact angle of water on polystyrene: a study of the cause of hysteresis. J Colloid Interface Sci 1978, 66: 360–362. 10.1016/0021-9797(78)90317-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Draper J, Luzinov I, Ionov L, Minko S, Varshney SK, Stamm M: Wettability and morphology of a mixed polymer brush prepared by simultaneous polymer addition. Abstr Pap Am Chem S 2003, 225: U623-U624.Google Scholar
- Tuteja A, Choi WJ, McKinley GH, Cohen RE, Rubner MF: Design parameters for superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity. MRS Bull 2008, 33: 752–758. 10.1557/mrs2008.161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.