Skip to main content

Comparative studies on single-layer reduced graphene oxide films obtained by electrochemical reduction and hydrazine vapor reduction


The comparison between two kinds of single-layer reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets, obtained by reduction of graphene oxide (GO) with the electrochemical method and hydrazine vapor reduction, referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively, is systematically studied. Although there is no morphology difference between the E-rGO and C-rGO films adsorbed on solid substrates observed by AFM, the reduction process to obtain the E-rGO and C-rGO films is quite different. In the hydrazine vapor reduction, the nitrogen element is incorporated into the obtained C-rGO film, while no additional element is introduced to the E-rGO film during the electrochemical reduction. Moreover, Raman spectra show that the electrochemical method is more effective than the hydrazine vapor reduction method to reduce the GO films. In addition, E-rGO shows better electrocatalysis towards dopamine than does C-rGO. This study is helpful for researchers to understand these two different reduction methods and choose a suitable one to reduce GO based on their experimental requirements.


Graphene, a kind of two-dimensional carbon materials, has attracted increasing attention [13]. Recent studies proved that the graphene-related materials have excellent characteristics in various applications such as synthesis of hybrid materials [411], capacitors [12, 13], sensors [11, 1420], electric devices [2124], solar cells [2527], drug delivery [28, 29], cell imaging [29], and cell cultures [30], etc. In order to produce large amount of graphene-related materials, the chemical methods are generally used [3133].

Normally, graphene oxide (GO) is synthesized by the modified Hummers method [3133], which is a strong oxidation method by using the concentrated sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate as oxidation agents. During the oxidation, the π-π electronic conjugation of graphite is destroyed, and the carbon sheets are decorated with the epoxide and hydroxyl groups in their basal planes as well as the carbonyl and carboxyl groups at their edges [3436]. These functional groups render GO hydrophilic, facilitating the dispersion of GO in aqueous solution. After the reduction of GO with hydroquinone [37], NaBH4 [38], hydrazine hydrate [39], hydrazine vapor [31, 4043], or hydrazine with NH3 [44], GO is deoxygenated and reduced GO (rGO] is obtained. However, these reducing agents, particularly hydrazine, are toxic, and the use of them should be with extreme care and minimized [45]. In addition, the excessive reducing agents might contaminate the resulting product, i.e. rGO.

Recently, our group [46] and other groups [4749] independently developed an electrochemical method to reduce GO, which is simple, fast, and green, as compared with the aforementioned chemical methods. More importantly, the highly negative potential used in the electrochemical method can overcome the energy barriers to efficiently reduce the oxygen-containing functional groups in GO [47].

Both the electrochemical reduction [20, 4649] and hydrazine vapor reduction [31, 4043, 50] can reduce GO to get electrochemically reduced GO (E-rGO) and chemically reduced GO (C-rGO), referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively. In this work, after a systematic study, we found that although the morphologies of single-layer E-rGO and C-rGO adsorbed on solid substrates are quite similar, their components and especially their electrocatalysis towards dopamine (DA) are quite different. Our experiment results showed that the amount of oxygen-containing functional groups in C-rGO is more than that in E-rGO, and the electrocatalysis of E-rGO towards DA is better than that of C-rGO.

Experimental details

Nature graphite was purchased from Bay Carbon (Bay City, Michigan, USA) and used for synthesizing GO. 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), H2O2 (30%), H2SO4 (98%), phosphate buffered saline, K4[Fe(CN)6] (99.9%), K3[Fe(CN)6] (99%), hexaammine ruthenium (III) chloride (98%), dopamine hydrochloride (99%), uric acid (UA) (≥ 99%), and hydrazine hydrate (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) and used as received. Ascorbic acid (AA) (≥ 99.5%, Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich), HCl (37%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), NH3·H2O (28%, J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), NaCl (99.5%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used as received. Toluene was purified from a solvent purification system (PS-400-5, innovative technology Inc, USA). Indium tin oxide (ITO) (10 ohm/sq, thickness, 0.7 mm) was purchased from Kintec Company (Hong Kong, China). Ultrapure Milli-Q water (Milli-Q System, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used in all experiments.

GO was synthesized based on our previous report [31]. The obtained GO powder was dispersed in water with a certain concentration by sonication to get GO aqueous solution. The adsorptions of single-layer GO on APTES-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) [46], ITO [46], and SiO2 substrates [31, 50], referred to as GCE-APTES-GO, ITO-APTES-GO, and SiO2-APTES-GO, respectively, were prepared based on our previous reports. The obtained GCE-APTES-GO and ITO-APTES-GO electrodes were scanned in 0.5 M NaCl solution saturated with N2 from 0.7 to -1.1 V at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1 [46].

The GCE-APTES-GO, ITO-APTES-GO, and SiO2-APTES-GO electrodes were reduced by hydrazine vapor at 80°C overnight based on our previous report [31].

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained by using Dimension 3100 (Veeco, CA, USA) in tapping mode using Si tip (Veeco, resonant frequency, 320 kHz, Spring constant, 42 N m-1) under ambient conditions with a scanning rate of 1 Hz and scanning line of 512.

Raman spectra were recorded on a WITec CRM200 confocal Raman microscopy system using 633 nm laser with an air cooling charge-coupled device as detector (WITec Instrument Corp, Germany). Before measurement, the instrument was calibrated by silicon wafer.

All electrochemical measurements were carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell using CHI 660C Electrochemical Workstation (CHI instrument, Austin, TX, USA). In the experiment, GCE or ITO, platinum electrode, and Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode were used as working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. All the potentials shown in this work refer to the Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode.

Results and discussion

The experiment process is shown in Figure 1. The single-layer GO film was adsorbed on the 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-modified GCE, referred to as GCE-APTES-GO [20, 46]. After GCE-APTES-GO was reduced by the electrochemical method [20, 46] and hydrazine vapor reduction [31], the obtained products are referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively. As proof-of-concept, DA was chosen to compare the electrocatalysis properties of E-rGO and C-rGO.

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of preparation of E-rGO and C-rGO.

In order to study the GO and rGO films by AFM and Raman spectroscopy, single-layer GO was assembled on APTES-modified ITO and SiO2 substrates, referred to as ITO-APTES-GO and SiO2-APTES-GO, respectively, which then was reduced by electrochemical method and hydrazine vapor reduction (see the Experimental details). Figure S1 (see Additional file 1) shows AFM images of GO and rGO films. Although a few overlaps between single-layer GO or rGO films showed up, the morphologies of the GO films before and after reduction have not shown much difference.

The previous study reported that that new C-N bond appeared in C-rGO [39]. But after the electrochemical reduction, no additional element was incorporated into the product of E-rGO [20, 46]. We believe that this difference arises from the different reduction methods.

The mechanism of hydrazine vapor reduction of the functional groups, e.g. ketone, in GO might follow the probable route as shown in Figure S2 (See Additional file 1) [51], which is different from the mechanism of the electrochemical reduction of GO proposed by Dong et al. who suggested that the hydrogen ions played an essential role in the electro-reduction process [48]. In the process of hydrazine vapor reduction, the new C-N bond was introduced. But during the electrochemical reduction, the aromatic ketone, alcohol, benzylic alcohol, phenol, and aromatic carboxylic acid groups in GO might be reduced by the electrons from the extra power [52], and no new element was incorporated since no reducing agent, e.g. hydrazine, was used.

Raman spectroscopy is an effective tool to characterize the structural change of GO after reduction. In Figure 2, the peak at around 1,600 cm-1 is assigned to the E2g mode, i.e. G band [39], and the peak at 1,350 cm-1 is corresponding to the D band [38]. Both GO and rGO have these two bands. But the intensity ratio of D/G increased after the reduction (curves b, c, and d in Figure 2), suggesting a decrease in the average size of the in-plane sp2 domains upon the reduction of the exfoliated GO and rGO was obtained [39]. Importantly, it should be noted that the G band shifted during the Raman measurement of E-rGO (curves c and d). For the fresh reduction product of E-rGO, it is found that G band shifted from 1,600 to 1,587 cm-1 (curve c) compared with GO. But after E-rGO has been kept in air for 1 day, the G band shifted back to 1,599 cm-1 (curve d). This phenomenon was not observed on the C-rGO.

Figure 2

Raman spectra of ITO-APTES-GO and C-rGO and fresh reduction of ITO-APTES-E-rGO. Raman spectra of (a) ITO-APTES-GO, (b) ITO-APTES-C-rGO, (c) fresh reduction of ITO-APTES-E-rGO, and (d) ITO-APTES-E-rGO after kept in air for 1 day. Laser, 633 nm.

Unlike the hydrazine reduction, no extra element was introduced into E-rGO during the process of electrochemical reduction. The Raman spectroscopy of E-rGO is similar to the pristine graphene, which results in the G band shift to 1,587 cm-1. But after being kept in air for 1 day, E-rGO might be doped by the moisture or physisorbed oxygen [53]. This p-doping was reflected by the upshift of G band [53]. In order to reduce the effect of p-doping to E-rGO, the freshly prepared E-rGO was immediately used for the following experiments.

In order to evaluate the charge transfer properties of E-rGO and C-rGO, cyclic voltammograms (CV) were performed in [Ru(NH3)6]3+/2+ solution (Figure 3A). The peak-to-peak separations (ΔEp) of C-rGO (solid line) and E-rGO (dashed line) are 82 and 78 mV, respectively. In addition, the difference between peak current of E-rGO and C-rGO is approximately 6 μA. This result indicates that the surface negative charge on the surface of E-rGO and C-rGO has similar effects on the electron transfer property of redox system [Ru(NH3)6]3+/2+. Since the GO films used for preparation of C-rGO and E-rGO are the same, the current instead of current density was used here to compare the conductivity of C-rGO and E-rGO.

Figure 3

CV curves of C-rGO (solid line) and E-rGO (dashed line). In (A) 1.0 mM [Ru(NH3)6]3+/2+ (1:1) containing 0.1 M KCl and (B) 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- (1:1) containing 0.1 M KCl.

To probe negative charge amount present on the C-rGO and E-rGO surface, the C-rGO and E-rGO were evaluated by CV using [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as indicators (Figure 3B). It has been reported that the voltammetry of [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- is sensitive to the surface functional groups, such as hydrogen and oxygen-containing groups, present in the carbon-based electrode [54]. Therefore, in our experiment, [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- was chosen as an indicator to explore the properties of E-rGO and C-rGO. Figure 3B represents the typical CV curves of C-rGO (solid line) and E-rGO (dashed line) in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- solution containing 0.1 M KCl. The ΔEp of C-rGO and E-rGO are 82 and 73 mV, respectively. These ΔEp values indicate that the microstructural defects and density of electronic states near Fermi potential between C-rGO and E-rGO is different [54]. Since only partial functional groups of GO have been reduced, negatively charged functional groups remain on the surface of rGO. As [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- is also negatively charged, the repulsion force between rGO and [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- reflects the amount of the negatively charged functional groups in rGO. From Figure 3B, it can be seen that the currents for C-rGO and E-rGO are 19 and 23 μA, respectively. Therefore, the amount of negatively charged groups in C-rGO is higher than those in E-rGO, confirming that the efficiency of hydrazine vapor reduction is lower than that of electrochemical reduction.

In order to compare the electrocatalytic activity of C-rGO and E-rGO, the detection of DA was performed by using C-rGO (Figure 4A) and E-rGO (Figure 4B), respectively. Usually, two factors are considered in the detection of DA. One is the interference from other electroactive species such as AA and UA [54]. Both AA and UA can be electrochemically oxidized at the potential close to DA, resulting in an overlapped oxidation peak. The other is that the concentration of AA is higher than that of DA in the neuronal regions [54]. In the pure AA, DA, or UA solution, the similar peaks were observed at C-rGO (Figure 4A) and E-rGO (Figure 4B). Such electrocatalysis of E-rGO and C-rGO towards DA is probably due to the edge-plane-like defects on rGO surface that might provide many active sites and accelerate electron transfer between the electrode and species in solution [55]. However, in the mixture of AA, DA, and UA, the obtained results are quite different. With E-rGO, well-defined oxidation peaks for AA, DA, and UA located at 52, 220 and 350 mV, respectively, showed up (Figure 4B), indicating the independently electrochemical oxidation of each analyte. However, with C-rGO, the oxidation peaks for the mixed analytes did not separate well (Figure 4A). The oxygen-containing species present on the graphene sheets are responsible for the electron transfer as well as the adsorption/desorption of molecules [56]. The better electrocatalytic activity of E-rGO might arise from the smaller amount of oxygen functional groups left on the surface of E-rGO. Therefore, E-rGO, instead of C-rGO, was applied to detect DA in the mixture solution in the following experiment.

Figure 4

CV curves of C-rGO and E-rGO in the mixture of AA, DA, and UA. CV curves of (A) C-rGO and (B) E-rGO in (a) the mixture of AA (1.0 mM), DA (0.1 mM), and UA (0.1 mM), (b) 1.0 mM AA, (c) 0.1 mM DA, and (d) 0.1 mM UA. Electrolyte, 0.01 M PBS buffer (pH 7.4).

Using the differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) technique, DA was detected with E-rGO (Figure 5). The peak intensity of DA increased with the concentration of DA (Figure 5A). Note that the DPV peak current is linear to the concentration of DA in the range of 0 to 50 μM (Figure 5B). Even at the very low concentration of DA, e.g. 1 μM, DA can be detected from the mixture of 1 mM AA, 0.1 mM UA, and 1 μM DA.

Figure 5

DPV profiles of E-rGO and the plot of DPV peak as function of DA concentration. (A) DPV profiles of E-rGO in the solution of 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM AA, 0.1 mM UA, and different concentration of DA (from 0 to 50 μM). (B) The plot of DPV peak current as function of DA concentration.


Single-layer rGO, obtained by electrochemical method (referred to as E-rGO) and hydrazine vapor reduction (referred to as C-rGO), respectively, was compared in morphology and the component change after reduction and electrocatalysis towards DA. In the hydrazine vapor reduction, nitrogen was incorporated into the product, while no additional element was introduced during the electrochemical reduction. After reduction, the morphology has not shown obvious difference between the single-layer GO and rGO films. However, the CV results indicate that the electrochemical method is more effective to reduce GO films than does the hydrazine vapor reduction method. In addition, the product E-rGO showed better electrocatalysis towards dopamine than does C-rGO. Our comparative study is helpful for researchers to understand these two reduction methods and choose a suitable one to reduce GO based on their experimental requirements.


  1. 1.

    Novoselov KS, Gerim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306: 666. 10.1126/science.1102896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huang X, Yin Z, Wu S, Qi X, He Q, Zhang Q, Yan Q, Boey F, Zhang H: Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties and applications. Small 2011, 7: 1876. 10.1002/smll.201002009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H: Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41: 666. 10.1039/c1cs15078b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Huang X, Li SZ, Huang YZ, Wu SX, Zhou XZ, Li SZ, Gan CL, Boey F, Mirkin CA, Zhang H: Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nat Commun 2011, 2: 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Qi XY, Pu K-Y, Li H, Zhou XZ, Wu SX, Fan Q-L, Liu B, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: Amphiphilic graphene composites. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49: 9426. 10.1002/anie.201004497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang X, Zhou XZ, Wu SX, Wei YY, Qi XY, Zhang J, Boey F, Zhang H: Reduced graphene oxide-templated photochemical synthesis and in situ assembly of Au nanodots to orderly patterned Au nanodot chains. Small 2010, 6: 513. 10.1002/smll.200902001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qi XY, Pu K-Y, Zhou XZ, Li H, Liu B, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: Conjugated-polyelectrolyte-functionalized reduced graphene oxide with excellent solubility and stability in polar solvents. Small 2010, 6: 663. 10.1002/smll.200902221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cao XH, He QY, Shi WH, Zeng ZY, Shi YM, Yan QY, Zhang H: Graphene oxide as carbon source for controlled growth of carbon nanowires. Small 2011, 7: 1199. 10.1002/smll.201100071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Feng LL, Gao G, Huang P, Wang XS, Zhang CL, Zhang JL, Guo SW, Cui DX: Preparation of Pt Ag alloy nanoisland/graphene hybrid composites and its high stability and catalytic activity in methanol electro-oxidation. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 551. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bhandari S, Deepa M, Joshi AG, Saxena AP, Srivastava AK: Revelation of graphene-Au for direct write deposition and characterization. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 424. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dong XC, Huang W, Chen P: In Situ Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Gold Nanocomposites for Nanoelectronics and Biosensing. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cao XH, Shi YM, Shi WH, Lu G, Huang X, Yan QY, Zhang QC, Zhang H: Preparation of novel three dimensional graphene networks for supercapacitor applications. Small 2011, 7: 3163. 10.1002/smll.201100990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Stoller MD, Park SJ, Zhu YW, An JH, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3498. 10.1021/nl802558y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ang PK, Chen W, Wee ATS, Loh KP: Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 14392. 10.1021/ja805090z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sudibya HG, He QY, Zhang H, Chen P: Electrical detection of metal ions using field-effecttransistors based on micropatterned reduced graphene oxide films. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 1990. 10.1021/nn103043v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He Q, Wu S, Gao S, Cao X, Yin Z, Li H, Chen P, Zhang H: Transparent, flexible, all-reduced graphene oxide thin film transistors. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 5038. 10.1021/nn201118c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    He Q, Sudibya HG, Yin Z, Wu S, Li H, Boey F, Huang W, Chen P, Zhang H: Centimeter-long and large-scale micropatterns of reduced graphene oxide films: fabrication and sensing applications. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 3201. 10.1021/nn100780v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yin ZY, Huang X, Zhang J, Wu SX, Chen P, Lu G, Chen P, Zhang QC, Yan QY, Zhang H: Real-time DNA detection using Pt nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide field-effect transistors. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 293. 10.1039/c1nr11149c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lu G, Li H, Liusman C, Yin Z, Wu S, Zhang H: Surface enhanced raman scattering of Ag nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide for detection of aromatic molecules. Chem Sci 2011, 2: 1817. 10.1039/c1sc00254f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Z, Zhang J, Chen P, Zhou X, Yang Y, Wu S, Niu L, Han Y, Wang L, Chen P, Boey F, Zhang Q, Liedberg B, Zhang H: Label-free, electrochemical detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus DNA with reduced graphene oxide-modified electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron 2011, 26: 3881. 10.1016/j.bios.2011.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bunch JS, van der Zande AM, Verbridge SS, Frank IW, Tanenbaum DM, Parpia JM, Craighead HG, McEuen PL: Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets. Science 2007, 315: 490. 10.1126/science.1136836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu JQ, Yin ZY, Cao XH, Zhao F, Ling A, Xie LH, Fan QL, Boey F, Zhang H, Huang W: Bulk heterojunction polymer memory devices with reduced graphene oxide as electrodes. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 3987. 10.1021/nn100877s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li B, Cao X, Ong HG, Cheah JW, Zhou X, Yin Z, Li H, Wang J, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: All-carbon electronic devices fabricated by directly grown single-walled carbon nanotubes on reduced graphene oxide electrodes. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 3058. 10.1002/adma.201000736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu JQ, Lin Z, Liu T, Yin Z, Zhou XZ, Chen S, Xie LH, Boey F, Zhang H, Huang W: Multilayer-stacked, low temperature-reduced graphene oxide films: preparation, characterization and application in polymer memory devices. Small 2010, 6: 1536. 10.1002/smll.201000328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yin Z, Wu S, Zhou X, Huang X, Zhang Q, Boey F, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of ZnO nanorods on transparent reduced graphene oxide electrodes for hybrid solar cells. Small 2010, 6: 307. 10.1002/smll.200901968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yin ZY, Sun S, Salim T, Wu SX, Huang X, He QY, Lam YM, Zhang H: Organic photovoltaic devices using highly flexible reduced graphene oxide films as transparent electrodes. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 5263. 10.1021/nn1015874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Song JL, Yin ZY, Yang ZJ, Amaladass P, Wu SX, Ye J, Zhao Y, Deng WQ, Zhang H, Liu XW: Enhancement of photogenerated-electron transport in dye-sensitized solar cells with introduction of reduced graphene oxide-TiO2junction. Chem Eur J 2011, 17: 10832. 10.1002/chem.201101263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun XM, Dai HJ: PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 10876. 10.1021/ja803688x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sun XM, Liu Z, Welsher K, Robinson JT, Goodwin A, Zaric S, Dai HJ: Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res 2008, 1: 203. 10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Agarwal S, Zhou X, Ye F, He Q, Chen GCK, Soo J, Boey F, Zhang H, Chen P: Interfacing live cells with nanocarbon substrates. Langmuir 2010, 26: 2244. 10.1021/la9048743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhou XZ, Huang X, Qi XY, Wu SX, Xue C, Boey FYC, Yan QY, Zhang H: In-situ synthesis of metal nanoparticles on single-layer graphene oxide surface. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 10842. 10.1021/jp903821n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442: 282. 10.1038/nature04969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hummers WS, Offeman RE: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958, 80: 1339. 10.1021/ja01539a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Szabo T, Berkesi O, Dekany I: DRIFT study of deuterium-exchanged graphite oxide. Carbon 2005, 43: 3186. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cote LJ, Kim F, Huang JX: Langmuir-blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 1043. 10.1021/ja806262m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stankovich S, Piner RD, Chen XQ, Wu NQ, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). J Mater Chem 2006, 16: 155. 10.1039/b512799h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang GX, Yang J, Park J, Gou XL, Wang B, Liu H, Yao J: Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 8192. 10.1021/jp710931h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lomeda JR, Doyle CD, Kosynkin DV, Hwang W-F, Tour JM: Diazonium functionalization of surfactant-wrapped chemically converted graphene sheets. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 16201. 10.1021/ja806499w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST: Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007, 45: 1558. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Robinson JT, Perkins FK, Snow ES, Wei ZQ, Sheehan PE: Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3137. 10.1021/nl8013007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wu SX, Yin ZY, He QY, Huang X, Zhou XZ, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of semiconductor oxides on reduced graphene oxide-based flexible, transparent and conductive electrodes. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 11816. 10.1021/jp103696u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhou XZ, Wei YY, He QY, Boey F, Zhang QC, Zhang H: Reduced graphene oxide films used as matrix of MALDI-TOF-MS for detection of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Chem Commun 2010, 46: 6974. 10.1039/c0cc01681k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wu SX, Yin ZY, He QY, Zhou XZ, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of Cl-doped n-type Cu2O on reduced graphene oxide electrodes. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 3467. 10.1039/c0jm02267e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Li D, Muller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallance GG: Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nature Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 101. 10.1038/nnano.2007.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fan XB, Peng WC, Li Y, Li XY, Wang SL, Zhang GL, Zhang FB: Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang ZJ, Zhou XZ, Zhang J, Boey F, Zhang H: Direct electrochemical reduction of single-layer graphene oxide and subsequent functionalization with glucose oxidase. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 14071. 10.1021/jp906348x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Guo H-L, Wang X-F, Qian Q-Y, Wang F-B, Xia X-H: A green approach to the synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 2653. 10.1021/nn900227d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhou M, Wang Y, Zhai YM, Zhai JF, Ren W, Wang FA, Dong SJ: Controlled synthesis of large-area and patterned electrochemically reduced graphene oxide films. Chem Eur J 2009, 15: 6116. 10.1002/chem.200900596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ramesha GK, Sampath S: Electrochemical reduction of oriented graphene oxide films: an in situ raman spectroelectrochemical study. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 7985. 10.1021/jp811377n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhou X, Lv G, Qi XY, Wu S, Li H, Boey F, Zhang H: A method for fabrication of graphene oxide nanoribbons from graphene oxide wrinkles. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 19119. 10.1021/jp9079298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lάszlό K, Czakό B: Strategic Applications of Named Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Elsevier Academic Press; 2005:496.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Stratmann M, Bard AJ: Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry. WILEY-VCH; 2004:199.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dong XC, Fu DL, Fang W, Shi YM, Chen P, Li L-J: Doping single-layer graphene with aromatic molecules. Small 2009, 5: 1422. 10.1002/smll.200801711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Alwarappan S, Erdem A, Liu C, Li C-Z: Probing the electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheets for biosensing applications. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 8853. 10.1021/jp9010313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhou M, Zhai Y, Dong S: Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on chemically reduced graphene oxide. Anal Chem 2009, 81: 5603. 10.1021/ac900136z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Pumera M: Electrochemistry of graphene: new horizons for sensing and energy storage. Chem Rec 2009, 9: 211. 10.1002/tcr.200900008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by MOE under AcRF Tier 2 (ARC 10/10, No. MOE2010-T2-1-060), the Singapore National Research Foundation under CREATE programme: Nanomaterials for Energy and Water Management, and NTU under the New Initiative Fund FY 2010 (M58120031) in Singapore.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Zhang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HZ led the project, participated in the design of the experiments, analysis of the data and revision of the manuscript. ZW designed and carried out the experiments, and drafted the manuscript. SW and JZ carried out some electrochemical experiments. PC participated in the Raman measurement. XZ helped the Raman analysis. GY did the XPS measurements. QZ and QY revised the manuscript. All authors read and the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1 and Figure S2

Additional file 1: . For Figure S1, AFM images of (A) ITO-APTES-GO, (B) ITO-APTES-E-rGO, (C) SiO2-APTES-GO and (D) SiO2-APTES-C-rGO. For Figure S2, proposed mechanism for reduction of ketone in GO by hydrazine vapor [2]. (DOCX 546 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Wu, S., Zhang, J. et al. Comparative studies on single-layer reduced graphene oxide films obtained by electrochemical reduction and hydrazine vapor reduction. Nanoscale Res Lett 7, 161 (2012).

Download citation


  • Uric Acid
  • Graphene Oxide
  • Glassy Carbon Electrode
  • Hydrazine Hydrate
  • Electrochemical Reduction