- Nano Express
- Open Access
Ultra-low reflectance, high absorption microcrystalline silicon nanostalagmite
Nanoscale Research Lettersvolume 7, Article number: 171 (2012)
In this work, microcrystalline silicon nanostalagmite [μc-SiNS] arrays have been successfully fabricated on glass by catalytic etching process through a template. The template, polystyrene [PS] nanospheres, with diameter and density of 30 to approximately 50 nm and 1010/cm2, respectively, was obtained by a modified nanophase separation of PS-containing block copolymer. The length of μc-SiNS could be controlled by the duration of etching time. The μc-SiNS exhibits ultra-low reflection approximately 0.3% and absorption around 99% over 300 to 800 nm in wavelength. Reflection is also suppressed for a wide range of angles of incidence in wide range of wavelength. This indicates the extensive light-trapping effect by the μc-SiNS and could possibly harvest a large amount of solar energy at infrared regime.
Silicon thin film solar cells are promising candidates for future generations of photovoltaic devices [1, 2]. They offer cost effectiveness and the possibility of deposition on flexible substrates [3–5]. However, the efficiency of thin film Si solar cell is relatively low compared to crystalline solar cell. The low absorption rate, relative poor material quality and narrow absorption spectra are the major factors. In the past few years, there is an enormously growing interest in the development of nanostructure materials to improve the light-harvesting efficiency for achieving high-efficiency Si thin film solar cell while maintaining low cost. Feasible silicon nanostructures such as silicon nanowires [SiNWs] have gained much attention due to their unique properties and possible applications in the fields of nanoelectronics [6–9], nanooptoelectronics [9, 10], nanophotovolatics [11–17] and for sensor applications . SiNWs are usually produced via vapour-liquid-solid [VLS] growth mechanism , which introduced one-dimensionality growing of nanostructure by a metal nanocatalyst droplet containing gases such as silane or grow from the gas phase by supplying Si vapour. However, the VLS growth mechanism generally requests high temperature that is not the adequate method for Si thin film nanostructure. In particular, the microcrystalline silicon [μc-Si] solar cells grown on glass or plastic substrate cannot sustain high temperature.
Nanoelectronics and nanooptoelectronics require vertically oriented, length tuneable and high density silicon nanostructures to obtain processing compatibility. To obtain such nanostructure, since some of the VLS growth does not occur, the wet chemical etching [20–23] through a predetermined template might be a possible method to achieve light-trapping structure at low cost. An efficient light management is essential to further improve the light confinement in the cells. Light trapping is the standard technique for improving thin film silicon efficiencies and exploiting the sunlight. In particular, μc-Si solar cells have gained considerable attention in the recent years. Wet chemically etched μc-Si surfaces by catalytic etching method that forms the μc-Si nanostalagmite show an ultra-low reflectance compared to Si thin film layers. This ultra-low reflectance is potentially fascinating for photovoltaic applications where enough absorption of solar light occurs in thinnest Si layer possible. The μc-SiNSs structure can be used as solar cell absorber.
In this study, we show the wet chemical etching of silicon nanostalagmite arrays with controlled length, size and density with a potentially high throughput by 30 to approximately 50 nm polystyrene [PS] spheres in a convenient method. It exhibits a black appearance, and they are almost non-reflective due to strong light scattering and absorption inside the μc-SiNSs structure. The reflectance and transmittance of the μc-SiNS are about 0.3% in average over the spectral range of 300 to 800 nm.
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram for the fabrication of μc-SiNS arrays using a polystyrene nanospheres template obtained by the modified block copolymer nanopatterning method. SiNSs were prepared on indium-tin-oxide/glass substrate thorough a template by chemical etching with silver [Ag] catalyst. Initially, approximately 1 μm thick microcrystalline silicon [μc-Si] is deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition [PECVD] on glass substrate. The template used polystyrene nanospheres with a diameter of 30 to approximately 50 nm and density of 1010/cm2 by nanophase separation of the PS-containing block copolymers as shown in the scanning electron microscope [SEM] image of Figure 2. The formation of PS nanospheres is implemented through a modified block copolymer (polystyrene-b- polymethylmethacrylate (acrylic) [PS-b-PMMA]) process by removing PMMA and reshaping the remained PS material . After the formation of PS nanospheres on top of μc-Si, the silver film was deposited using thermal evaporator at the rate of 0.1 Å/s. The thickness of Ag film was 10 nm. A Teflon vessel was used as the container. For the solution etching process, an etching mixture consisting of hydrofluoric acid [HF], hydrogen peroxide [H2O2] and de-ionised water was used at room temperature. The concentrations of HF and H2O2 were 4.6 and 0.44 M, respectively. The Ag layers adhering to the Si surfaces had a higher electro-negativity than the Si, and electrons were therefore attracted to Ag from the Si, making the Ag layers negatively charged. The electrons from the negatively charged Ag layers were preferentially captured by the O- ions of the H2O2 and become O2- ions. This charge transfer caused local oxidation of the Si underneath the Ag patterns. The resultant SiO2 was then continuously etched away by HF, leading to the penetration of Ag into the Si substrates [16, 25]. The μc-SiNSs are obtained when the Ag penetration reached a certain depth. The etching duration was varied depending on the required length of the nanostalagmites. After etching, the substrate was immersed in toluene for 1 h to remove the PS nanospheres. The silver film was then removed by immersing it in boiling aqua regia (3:1 (v/v) hydrochloric acid/nitric acid) for 15 min.
Results and discussion
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the silicon nanostalagmite array on the glass substrate. Length of SiNS can be controlled and varies linearly with the duration of catalyst etching process. Figure 3a, b shows high magnification cross-sectional SEM image of μc-SiNSs fabricated with different catalyst chemical etching times of 30 and 90 sec, producing nanostalagmites with a length of around 300 nm and 1 μm respectively. The SiNSs are randomly distributed due to PS nanosphere template which is aperiodic as shown in Figure 2. Although the SiNSs were not strictly vertical, this structure is still similar to that of the anti-reflection feathers on the eyes of moths [26, 27].
Nanowires provide not only the advantage of more efficient charge transport over planar material but also present the potential for improved optical absorption characteristics [27, 28]. Nanostalagmites are similar in structure with nanowires. The SiNSs were expected to have an efficient light-trapping effect. The incident light will have multiple internal reflections to cause an optical path for light absorption. Optical measurements were performed on the microcrystalline samples before and after μc-SiNS fabrication. The prepared μc-SiNSs samples were black in appearance and highly non-reflective to the naked eye. Transmittance and reflectance spectra of thin μc-Si film before (light-grey) and after etching to form nanostalagmites (black) were shown in Figure 4a. The transmittance for μc-SiNS over the entire spectral range from 300 to 800 nm is around 0.3%. In comparison, the planar control shows increased transmittance and strong interference patterns after 600 nm. The reflectance of μc-SiNSs and μc-Si film were also depicted in Figure 4a. The ultra-low reflectance of the μc-SiNSs array, which is around 0.3% over 300 to 800 nm, was also observed. In comparison, the planar μc-Si film exhibits around 20% to 30% reflectance over the measured spectrum. The ultra-low reflectance of SiNSs is caused by a strong absorption due to the strong light-trapping property of the dense SiNSs. The nanostalagmite simply acts as a very effective anti-reflection layer. This might be due to the 'moth-eye-like' biomimetic effect.
The acquisition of reflectance [R] and transmittance [T] spectra from μc-Si nanostalagmites allows further obtaining of their absorbance [A] spectra, expressed as A(%) = 100 - R(%) - T(%) as shown in Figure 4b. Photographs of bare μc-Si and a chemically etched substrate are shown in inset Figure 4b. The absorption over 98% was obtained for SiNSs over the measured spectrum from 300 to 800 nm. This indicates that the SiNSs could extend the absorption to the infrared regime, harvesting more light to increase photocurrent. Our nanostructure SiNS has low reflectance and high absorption; similarly, silicon nanocone  and nanodome  have higher absorption also. However, their process using reactive ion etching which means a high vacuum was used. Here, we demonstrated an alternative way by using simple and chemical process to get silicon nanostalagmite structure. This remarkable property suggests that SiNS arrays are appropriate candidates for antireflective surfaces and absorption materials used in photovoltaic cells. The effect of light trapping could be understood by the absorption coefficient. By taking the R and transmittance [T0] spectrum into account, the absorption coefficient can be calculated by the following equation:
in which T is the transmission, α is the absorption coefficient and d is the thickness of the μc-Si layer. Figure 5 depicts the absorption coefficient of SiNSs layer. The highest absorption coefficient for the SiNSs layer is also approximately 7 × 104/cm at 620 nm. The absorption coefficient at wavelength shorter than 620 nm cannot be deduced because of the measured 'zero' transmittance, which is limited by the instrument. The absorption coefficient for the planar μc-Si is around 6 × 104/cm at 550 nm. For the planar μc-Si, the absorption decreases with increase of the wavelength. However, after 600 nm, since planar μc-Si shows clear interference in the transmittance and reflectance spectra, the Equation 1 is not applied well. The absorption coefficient for μc-Si after 600 nm can only be used for estimation of the advantage of SiNSs layer. By this estimation, the average absorption coefficient for μc-Si at 750 nm is around 2 × 103/cm. In comparison, the α value for SiNSs still retained around 6 × 104/cm. There is about 27 times difference. This indicates that the light in the SiNSs at this wavelength is multiple-reflected 27 times by rough estimation. A good antireflective coating should show low reflectance over a wide angle of incidence [AOI], which is important for applications in sunrise-to-sunset solar cells. Figure 6a shows a wide range of AOI in the wide range wavelength. For all possible angles of incidence, we have measured in the range wavelength from 300 to 800 nm. One of the unique features of this catalytic chemical etching SiNS is that efficient light trapping occurs irrespective of the angle of incidence. Angle-dependent reflective of SiNS array was shown in Figure 6b. The performance of SiNSs arrays showed a reduced dependence on the angle of incidence and significantly higher absorption at any angle. At angle of incidence up to 60°, the total reflectance was maintained almost approximately 0.3%.
In summary, we reported the fabrication of microcrystalline silicon nanostalagmite arrays on glass by catalytic etching process through 30 to approximately 50 nm PS nanosphere template. The length of nanostalagmite is defined by the duration of the etching process. The SiNSs arrays have low transmission, ultra-low reflection approximately 0.3% and high absorption around 99% compared to planar due to their strong light-trapping effect. Reflection is also suppressed for a wide range of angles of incidence in wide range of wavelength. This indicates the extensive light-trapping effect by the μc-SiNS and could possibly harvest a large amount of solar energy at infrared regime. The photocurrent could be largely enhanced with thin μc-Si layer in the future.
hydrogen peroxide: PECVD: plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition
scanning electron microscope
Hegedus S: Thin film solar modules: the low cost, high throughput and versatile alternative to Si wafers. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 2006, 14: 393. 10.1002/pip.704
Green MA: Consolidation of thin-film photovoltaic technology: the coming decade of opportunity. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 2006, 14: 383. 10.1002/pip.702
Rech B, Wagner H: Potential of amorphous silicon for solar cells. App Phys A: Mater Sci Process 1999, 69: 155. 10.1007/s003390050986
Meier J, Spitznagel J, Kroll U, Bucher C, Faÿ S, Moriarty T, Shah A: Potential of amorphous and microcrystalline silicon solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2004, 518: 451–452.
Salleo A, Wong WS (Eds): Flexible Electronics: Materials and Applications. New York: Springer; 2009.
Duan X, Lieber CM: General synthesis of compound semiconductor nanowires. Adv Mater 2001, 12: 298.
Cui Y, Duan X, Hu J, Lieber CM: Doping and electrical transport in silicon nanowires. J Phys Chem B 2000, 104: 5213.
Cui Y, Lieber CM: Functional nanoscale electronic devices assembled using silicon nanowire building blocks. Science 2001, 291: 851. 10.1126/science.291.5505.851
Huang Y, Duan X, Lieber CM: Nanowires for integrated multi-color photonics. Small 2005, 1: 142.
Duan X, Huang Y, Argarawal R, Lieber CM: Single-nanowire electrically driven lasers. Nature 2003, 421: 241. 10.1038/nature01353
Lu W, Lieber CM: Semiconductor nanowires. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2006, 39: R387. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/21/R01
Kelzenberg MD, Turner-Evans DB, Kayes BM, Filler MA, Putnam MC, Lewis NS, Atwater HA: Photovoltaic measurements in single-nanowire silicon solar cells. Nano Lett 2008, 8(2):710. 10.1021/nl072622p
Stelzner TH, Pietsch M, Andrä G, Falk F, Ose E, Christiansen SH: Silicon nanowire-based solar cells. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 295203. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/29/295203
Tian B, Zheng X, Kempa1 TJ, Fang Y, Yu N, Yu G, Huang J, Lieber CM: Coaxial silicon nanowires as solar cells and nanoelectronic power sources. Nature 2007, 449: 885. 10.1038/nature06181
Peng K, Huang Z, Zhu J: Fabrication of large-area silicon nanowire p-n junction diode arrays. Adv Mater 2004, 16: 73. 10.1002/adma.200306185
Thiyagu S, Devi BP, Pei Z: Fabrication of large area high density, ultra-low reflection silicon nanowire arrays for efficient solar cell applications. Nano Research 2011, 4(11):1136. 10.1007/s12274-011-0162-5
Pei Z, Thiyagu S, Jhong MS, Hsieh WS, Cheng SJ, Ho MW, Chen YH, Liu JC, Yeh CM: An amorphous silicon random nanocone/polymer hybrid solar cell. Sol Energy Mater and Sol Cells 2011, 95: 2431–2436. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.04.021
Elibol OH, Morisette D, Akin D, Denton JP, Bashir R: Integrated nanoscale silicon sensors using top-down fabrication. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 83: 4613. 10.1063/1.1630853
Wagner RS, Ellis WC: Vapor-liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growthapor-liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl Phys Lett 1964, 4: 89. 10.1063/1.1753975
Kim BS, Sangwoo S, Shin SJ, Kim KM, Cho HH: Micro-nano hybrid structures with manipulated wettability using a two-step silicon etching on a large area. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 333. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-333
Zhipeng H, Lifeng L, Nadine G: Quasi-radial growth of metal tube on Si nanowires template. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 165. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-165
Xiaocheng Li, Junshuai Li, Ting C, Beng KT, Jianxiong W, Hongyu Y: Periodically aligned Si nanopillar arrays as efficient antireflection layers for solar cell applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1721–1726. 10.1007/s11671-010-9701-3
Linhan L, Siping G, Xianzhong S, Jiayou F, Yan W: Synthesis and photoluminescence properties of porous silicon nanowire arrays. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1822–1828. 10.1007/s11671-010-9719-6
Thiyagu S, Pei Z, Ho MW, Cheng SJ, Hsieh WS, Lin YY: A modified block copolymer nano-patterning method for high density sub-30 nm polystyrene nanosphere and gold nanomesh formation. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2011, 3(2):215–221. 10.1166/nnl.2011.1156
Pei TH, Thiyagu S, Pei Z: Ultra high-density silicon nanowires for extremely low reflection invisible regime. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99: 153108. 10.1063/1.3650266
Huang YF, Chattopadhyay S, Jen YJ, Peng CY, Liu TA, Hsu YK, Pan CL, Lo HC, Hsu CH, Chang YH, Lee CS, Chen KH, Chen LC: Improved broadband and quasi-omnidirectional anti-reflection properties with biomimetic silicon nanostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 2007, 2: 770–774.
Tsakalakos L: Nanostructures for photovoltaics. Mater Sci Eng R 2008, 62: 175. 10.1016/j.mser.2008.06.002
Pei Z, Chang ST, Liu CW, Chen YC: Numerical simulation on the photovoltaic behavior of an amorphous-silicon nanowire-array solar cell. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2009, 30: 1305–1307.
Zhu J, Yu Z, Burkhard GF, Hsu CM, Connor ST, Xu Y, Wang Q, McGehee M, Fan S, Cui Y: Optical absorption enhancement in amorphous silicon nanowire and nanocone arrays. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 279. 10.1021/nl802886y
Zhu J, Hsu CM, Yu Z, Fan S, Cui Y: Nanodome solar cells with efficient light management and self-cleaning. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1979. 10.1021/nl9034237
We thank the National Science Council for financial support under grant NSC-99-ET-E-005-001-ET. The support from Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan (Republic of China) under contract no. A455DR1110 is highly acknowledged.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ST and ZP conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. ST and BPD carried out the experiments on fabrication and SEM/optical measurements of the nanostalagmites. YHC and JCL carried out PECVD experiments. ST drafted the manuscript. ZP revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.